Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 394
Filter
1.
J Perinatol ; 44(5): 724-730, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38351274

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of active surveillance and decolonization strategies on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection rates in a NICU. STUDY DESIGN: MRSA infection rates were compared before (2014-2016) and during (2017-2022) an active surveillance program. Eligible infants were decolonized with chlorohexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing and/or topical mupirocin. Successful decolonization and rates of recolonization were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-two (0.57%) of 9 100 hospitalized infants had invasive MRSA infections from 2014 to 2022; infection rates declined non-significantly. During the 6-year surveillance program, the risk of infection was 16.9-times [CI95 8.4, 34.1] higher in colonized infants than uncolonized infants. Those colonized with mupirocin-susceptible MRSA were more likely successfully decolonized (aOR 9.7 [CI95 4.2, 22.5]). Of 57 infants successfully decolonized who remained hospitalized, 34 (60%) became recolonized. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA infection rates did not significantly decline in association with an active surveillance and decolonization program. Alternatives to mupirocin and CHG are needed to facilitate decolonization.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Chlorhexidine , Cross Infection , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Mupirocin , Staphylococcal Infections , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Infant, Newborn , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Mupirocin/therapeutic use , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Baths
3.
JAMA ; 330(14): 1337-1347, 2023 10 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815567

ABSTRACT

Importance: Universal nasal mupirocin plus chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing in intensive care units (ICUs) prevents methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and all-cause bloodstream infections. Antibiotic resistance to mupirocin has raised questions about whether an antiseptic could be advantageous for ICU decolonization. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of iodophor vs mupirocin for universal ICU nasal decolonization in combination with CHG bathing. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two-group noninferiority, pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial conducted in US community hospitals, all of which used mupirocin-CHG for universal decolonization in ICUs at baseline. Adult ICU patients in 137 randomized hospitals during baseline (May 1, 2015-April 30, 2017) and intervention (November 1, 2017-April 30, 2019) were included. Intervention: Universal decolonization involving switching to iodophor-CHG (intervention) or continuing mupirocin-CHG (baseline). Main Outcomes and Measures: ICU-attributable S aureus clinical cultures (primary outcome), MRSA clinical cultures, and all-cause bloodstream infections were evaluated using proportional hazard models to assess differences from baseline to intervention periods between the strategies. Results were also compared with a 2009-2011 trial of mupirocin-CHG vs no decolonization in the same hospital network. The prespecified noninferiority margin for the primary outcome was 10%. Results: Among the 801 668 admissions in 233 ICUs, the participants' mean (SD) age was 63.4 (17.2) years, 46.3% were female, and the mean (SD) ICU length of stay was 4.8 (4.7) days. Hazard ratios (HRs) for S aureus clinical isolates in the intervention vs baseline periods were 1.17 for iodophor-CHG (raw rate: 5.0 vs 4.3/1000 ICU-attributable days) and 0.99 for mupirocin-CHG (raw rate: 4.1 vs 4.0/1000 ICU-attributable days) (HR difference in differences significantly lower by 18.4% [95% CI, 10.7%-26.6%] for mupirocin-CHG, P < .001). For MRSA clinical cultures, HRs were 1.13 for iodophor-CHG (raw rate: 2.3 vs 2.1/1000 ICU-attributable days) and 0.99 for mupirocin-CHG (raw rate: 2.0 vs 2.0/1000 ICU-attributable days) (HR difference in differences significantly lower by 14.1% [95% CI, 3.7%-25.5%] for mupirocin-CHG, P = .007). For all-pathogen bloodstream infections, HRs were 1.00 (2.7 vs 2.7/1000) for iodophor-CHG and 1.01 (2.6 vs 2.6/1000) for mupirocin-CHG (nonsignificant HR difference in differences, -0.9% [95% CI, -9.0% to 8.0%]; P = .84). Compared with the 2009-2011 trial, the 30-day relative reduction in hazards in the mupirocin-CHG group relative to no decolonization (2009-2011 trial) were as follows: S aureus clinical cultures (current trial: 48.1% [95% CI, 35.6%-60.1%]; 2009-2011 trial: 58.8% [95% CI, 47.5%-70.7%]) and bloodstream infection rates (current trial: 70.4% [95% CI, 62.9%-77.8%]; 2009-2011 trial: 60.1% [95% CI, 49.1%-70.7%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Nasal iodophor antiseptic did not meet criteria to be considered noninferior to nasal mupirocin antibiotic for the outcome of S aureus clinical cultures in adult ICU patients in the context of daily CHG bathing. In addition, the results were consistent with nasal iodophor being inferior to nasal mupirocin. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03140423.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Baths , Chlorhexidine , Iodophors , Mupirocin , Sepsis , Staphylococcal Infections , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Administration, Intranasal , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Baths/methods , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Iodophors/administration & dosage , Iodophors/therapeutic use , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Mupirocin/therapeutic use , Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic , Sepsis/epidemiology , Sepsis/microbiology , Sepsis/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , United States/epidemiology
4.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 44(11): 1707-1716, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34719647

ABSTRACT

Mupirocin nanoparticle-loaded hydrogel (MLH) was successfully developed. This study focused on the safety of cell lines and the biocompatibility of MLH for wound healing in rat models. MLH was assessed by an analysis of cytotoxicity and the secretion of inflammatory cytokines in cell lines. The cytocompatibility of MLH was compared with mupirocin ointment on full-thickness burn wounds in rats. The results indicated that MLH and blank hydrogel had no toxicity to human epidermal keratinocytes and human fibroblast cells. MLH inhibited lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activity in macrophage-like cells resulting in low nitric oxide production and reduced inflammatory cytokine production (interleukin (IL)-1ß) compared with a positive control (LPS only). In burn wounds, MLH and hydrogel healed the wound better than the other groups determined by wound contraction, reduced secretion, and the generation of new blood vessels, as well as promotion of hair follicle cells. Better granulation tissue proliferation, less necrosis, and a lower degree of inflammation were found in the MLH and blank hydrogel than in the mupirocin ointment. The hydrogel group reduced the macrophages (CD68) on day 14 at the edge of the wound. On day 28, T cells (CD3), B cells (CD20), and CD68+ cells were concentrated in the deeper subcutaneous tissue. Additionally, the transforming growth factor ß1 (TGF-ß1) concentration and matrix prometalloproteinase-2/tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 ratio in the MLH and hydrogel groups were less than those in the other groups. The MLH formulation was safe and effective in burn wound healing. Therefore, MLH formulations are promising candidates for further evaluation in clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Burns/drug therapy , Mupirocin/therapeutic use , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Biocompatible Materials , Cell Line , Cell Movement/drug effects , Collagen/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Hydrogels , Male , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Mupirocin/adverse effects , Nanoparticle Drug Delivery System , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Wound Healing/drug effects
5.
Dermatol Online J ; 27(7)2021 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34391333

ABSTRACT

Periungual pyogenic granulomas are benign vascular tumors that present as painful, round, spontaneously bleeding lesions composed of rapidly proliferating capillaries and excess tissue. The vast majority of pyogenic granulomas are caused by physical trauma or infectious agents and they may resolve spontaneously. Herein, we highlight a very rare case of periungual pyogenic granulomas induced by the regularly prescribed oral retinoid acitretin during treatment for congenital palmoplantar keratoderma. This unique case showed that it is feasible to continue acitretin therapy in the presence of pyogenic granuloma development if proper dose reduction and topical therapies are utilized. The patient's lesions resolved within two weeks of this protocol's initiation and the pyogenic granulomas did not recur over the course of a six-month follow-up observation period. In addition, we performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed databases for the clinical features and treatments in other reported acitretin-induced pyogenic granuloma cases; we compiled a comprehensive list of other prescription drugs known to cause pyogenic granulomas up-to-date.


Subject(s)
Acitretin/adverse effects , Granuloma, Pyogenic/chemically induced , Keratolytic Agents/adverse effects , Nail Diseases/chemically induced , Acitretin/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Clobetasol/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Keratoderma, Palmoplantar/drug therapy , Keratolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Male , Mupirocin/administration & dosage
6.
Pharm Dev Technol ; 26(8): 852-866, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34193003

ABSTRACT

The goal of this study was to develop and examine the nanogel-based topical delivery system of mupirocin. Nanogels were prepared with chitosan and bovine serum albumin by ionic gelation and Carbopol 940 was added to improve the gelling/adhesive properties. Detailed characterization studies were performed and the cellular binding capacity of radiolabeled nanogels was investigated on CCD-1070Sk cell lines. Results indicate the successful formation of nanogels with particle size and zeta potential ranged between 341.920-603.320 nm and 13.120-24.300 mV, respectively. The mechanical and rheological studies proved pseudoplastic and strong elastic gel behavior (G' > G''). Mupirocin was successfully entrapped into nanogels with a ratio of more than 95% and the loaded drug was slowly released up to 93.89 ± 3.07% within 24 h. The ex vivo penetration and permeation percentages of mupirocin were very low (1.172 ± 0.202% and 0.161 ± 0.136%) indicating the suitability of nanogels for dermal use against superficial skin infections. The microbiological studies pointed out the effectiveness of nanogels against Staphylococcus aureus strains. Nanogels did not show toxicity signs and the cell binding capacity of radiolabeled formulations was found to be higher than [99mTc]NaTcO4 to CCD-1070Sk cell line. Overall, mupirocin nanogels might be considered as a potential and safe topical treatment option for bacterial skin infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Nanogels , Acrylic Resins/administration & dosage , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Administration, Cutaneous , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Chitosan/administration & dosage , Chitosan/chemistry , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests , Humans , Mupirocin/pharmacokinetics , Nanogels/administration & dosage , Nanogels/chemistry , Permeability , Radiopharmaceuticals , Serum Albumin, Bovine/administration & dosage , Serum Albumin, Bovine/chemistry , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects
7.
J Pediatr ; 236: 70-77, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34023342

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of topical mupirocin in reducing Staphylococcus aureus colonization in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of mupirocin vs placebo in S aureus-colonized infants was conducted in a tertiary care NICU between October 2016 and December 2019. Weekly universal active surveillance with polymerase chain reaction screening identified colonized infants. Colonized infants received a 5-day course of mupirocin (mupirocin group) or petroleum jelly (control group). Repeat courses were given for additional positive screens. RESULTS: A total of 216 infants were enrolled; 205 were included in data analyses. Primary decolonization was more successful for mupirocin-treated infants (86 of 104 [83%]) than for controls (20 of 101; 20%) (P < .001). Although recurrent S aureus colonization occurred frequently (59 of 81 [73%] mupirocin-treated and 26 of 33 [79%] controls), subsequent decolonization remained more successful for mupirocin-treated infants than for controls (38 of 49 [78%] vs 2 of 21 [10%]; P < .001). Subgroup analyses of infants of ≤30 weeks' gestational age yielded similar results; decolonization occurred more often in mupirocin-treated infants compared with control infants (63 of 76 [83%] vs 13 of 74 [18%]; P < .001). Bacterial sterile site infections tended to be less frequent in mupirocin-treated infants compared with controls (2 of 104 [2%] vs 8 of 101 [8%]; P = .057). No invasive S aureus infections occurred in mupirocin-treated infants, but 50% of infections in controls were from S aureus, and 1 resulted in death. CONCLUSIONS: Universal active surveillance and targeted treatment with topical mupirocin is a successful decolonization strategy for NICU infants and may prevent S aureus infection. However, S aureus colonization frequently recurs, necessitating repeat treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02967432.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Bacterial Load/drug effects , Intensive Care, Neonatal , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Administration, Topical , Double-Blind Method , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Prospective Studies , Retreatment , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Time Factors
8.
Assay Drug Dev Technol ; 19(4): 216-225, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33781090

ABSTRACT

In the present study, mupirocin (MP), an antimicrobial agent, was formulated as a nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) by using a novel method named as melt emulsion ultrafiltration method. For the formulation of NLC, glyceryl monostearate and watermelon seed oil were used as solid and liquid lipids, respectively. The method was optimized for various parameters by Taguchi design of experiment and prepared NLCs were characterized for particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), shape, zeta potential, % drug loading, and in vitro release profile. The optimized NLCs were found to be smooth, monodisperse with PDI 0.229 ± 0.093. NLCs were found to have an average particle size of 139 ± 0.75 nm and +21.9 ± 0.98 mV as zeta potential. The % drug loading of optimized NLCs was found to be 59% ± 0.13%. The optimized NLCs were able to release the drug up to 24 h. The release kinetic study revealed mixed-order kinetics. Hence, it was concluded that the novel method is simple and able to fabricate MP-loaded NLCs with sustained release property and being stable in terms of particle size, PDI, and % drug loading.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents/chemistry , Citrullus/chemistry , Drug Carriers , Drug Compounding , Drug Liberation , Drug Stability , Glycerides/chemistry , Kinetics , Lipids/chemistry , Mupirocin/chemistry , Nanostructures , Particle Size , Plant Oils/chemistry , Ultrafiltration
10.
J Orthop Res ; 39(2): 333-338, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33258495

ABSTRACT

Preoperative decolonization, especially of Staphylococcus aureus carriers, has been proposed to reduce periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), but the evidence-based consensus is still lacking and data on long-term outcomes is scarce. In a previous randomized, single-blinded trial, decolonization produced no significant reduction of surgical site infections in overall elective orthopedic surgery at 3-month follow-up. A 2-year follow-up was then performed to specifically detect the impact of decolonization on delayed-onset PJI (3-24 months after surgery). Between November 2015 and September 2017, 613 of 1318 recruited patients underwent prosthetic surgery. Individuals were allocated into either the S. aureus carrier group (34%, 207 of 613 patients) or the noncarrier group (406 of 613 patients), according to nasal swab screening results. Both groups were then randomized into intervention and control arms. In the S. aureus group, the intervention consisted of daily chlorhexidine showers and application of mupirocin nasal ointment twice a day for 5 days before surgery. In noncarriers, only chlorhexidine showers were prescribed. Sample size calculation was based on the initial trial for overall and not for the prosthetic surgery group. No PJI was found at 2 years in either the carrier or in the noncarrier group. Therefore, no definite conclusion about the efficacy of preoperative decolonization to reduce PJI can be drawn. PJI proportions in this study were lower than described in the literature (mostly around 0.3%). Despite the insufficient sample size, this trial is the largest randomized trial on decolonization with a long-term follow-up, and results may be helpful for future meta-analyses.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Administration, Intranasal , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy
11.
Infect Dis Clin North Am ; 35(1): 107-133, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33303331

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus infections are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, and health care costs. S aureus colonization has been shown to increase risk for invasive and noninvasive infections. Decolonization of S aureus has been evaluated in multiple patient settings as a possible strategy to decrease the risk of S aureus transmission and infection. In this article, we review the recent literature on S aureus decolonization in surgical patients, patients with recurrent skin and soft tissue infections, critically ill patients, hospitalized non-critically ill patients, dialysis patients, and nursing home residents to inform clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Adult , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Critical Illness , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Dialysis/methods , Drug Administration Routes , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Nursing Homes , Soft Tissue Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
12.
J Sci Med Sport ; 24(6): 520-525, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33303369

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Skin and soft tissue infections commonly affect athletes and can lead to cluster outbreaks if not managed appropriately. We report the findings of an investigation into an outbreak of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infection in an Australian professional football team. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: Nose, axilla, groin and throat swab were collected from 47 participants. MRSA and MSSA isolates underwent antibiotic susceptibility testing, binary typing and whole genome sequencing. Infection control practitioners (ICPs) investigated the training grounds for risk factors in the transmission of S. aureus. RESULTS: Almost half of the participants (n=23, 48.9%) were found to be colonised with MSSA. An outbreak cluster of MRSA ST5 closely related to the fusidic acid-resistant New Zealand NZAK3 clone was identified in a group of four players. MSSA ST15 and MSSA ST291 strains were found to have colonised and spread between two and five players, respectively. All participants were advised to undergo decolonisation treatment consisting of 4% chlorhexidine body wash and mupirocin nasal ointment for ten days. The ICP team identified several unhygienic practices within the club's shared facilities that may have played a role in the transmission of S. aureus. CONCLUSIONS: We report for the first time a community-associated S. aureus outbreak involving the highly successful fusidic acid-resistant MRSA ST5 clone in a professional football club associated with inadequate hygiene procedures. Management and prevention of S. aureus relies heavily on hygiene education and adherence to personal and environmental hygiene practices and policies.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Football/statistics & numerical data , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Administration, Intranasal , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Australia/epidemiology , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Community-Acquired Infections/transmission , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fusidic Acid/pharmacology , Genome, Bacterial , Humans , Hygiene , Methicillin/pharmacology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Ointments , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/transmission , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics
13.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 9: CD007239, 2020 09 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32987448

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the health benefits of breastfeeding, initiation and duration rates continue to fall short of international guidelines. Many factors influence a woman's decision to wean; the main reason cited for weaning is associated with lactation complications, such as mastitis. Mastitis is an inflammation of the breast, with or without infection. It can be viewed as a continuum of disease, from non-infective inflammation of the breast to infection that may lead to abscess formation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of preventive strategies (for example, breastfeeding education, pharmacological treatments and alternative therapies) on the occurrence or recurrence of non-infective or infective mastitis in breastfeeding women post-childbirth. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (3 October 2019), and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials of interventions for preventing mastitis in postpartum breastfeeding women. Quasi-randomised controlled trials and trials reported only in abstract form were eligible. We attempted to contact the authors to obtain any unpublished results, wherever possible.  Interventions for preventing mastitis may include: probiotics, specialist breastfeeding advice and holistic approaches.   DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 trials (3034 women). Nine trials (2395 women) contributed data. Generally, the trials were at low risk of bias in most domains but some were high risk for blinding, attrition bias, and selective reporting. Selection bias (allocation concealment) was generally unclear. The certainty of evidence was downgraded due to risk of bias and to imprecision (low numbers of women participating in the trials). Conflicts of interest on the part of trial authors, and the involvement of industry funders may also have had an impact on the certainty of the evidence. Most trials reported our primary outcome of incidence of mastitis but there were almost no data relating to adverse effects, breast pain, duration of breastfeeding, nipple damage, breast abscess or recurrence of mastitis. Probiotics versus placebo Probiotics may reduce the risk of mastitis more than placebo (risk ratio (RR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35 to 0.75; 2 trials; 399 women; low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain if probiotics reduce the risk of breast pain or nipple damage because the certainty of evidence is very low. Results for the biggest of these trials (639 women) are currently unavailable due to a contractual agreement between the probiotics supplier and the trialists. Adverse effects were reported in one trial, where no woman in either group experienced any adverse effects. Antibiotics versus placebo or usual care The risk of mastitis may be similar between antibiotics and usual care or placebo (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.34; 3 trials; 429 women; low-certainty evidence). The risk of mastitis may be similar between antibiotics and fusidic acid ointment (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.81; 1 trial; 36 women; low-certainty evidence) or mupirocin ointment (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.05 to 3.89; 1 trial; 44 women; low-certainty evidence) but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. None of the trials reported adverse effects. Topical treatments versus breastfeeding advice The risk of mastitis may be similar between fusidic acid ointment and breastfeeding advice (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.22; 1 trial; 40 women; low-certainty evidence) and mupirocin ointment and breastfeeding advice (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.35; 1 trial; 48 women; low-certainty evidence) but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. One trial (42 women) compared topical treatments to each other. The risk of mastitis may be similar between fusidic acid and mupirocin (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.00; low-certainty evidence) but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. Adverse events were not reported. Specialist breastfeeding education versus usual care The risk of mastitis (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.17 to 4.95; 1 trial; 203 women; low-certainty evidence) and breast pain (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.37; 1 trial; 203 women; low-certainty evidence) may be similar but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. Adverse events were not reported. Anti-secretory factor-inducing cereal versus standard cereal The risk of mastitis (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.72; 1 trial; 29 women; low-certainty evidence) and recurrence of mastitis (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.03 to 4.57; 1 trial; 7 women; low-certainty evidence) may be similar but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. Adverse events were not reported. Acupoint massage versus routine care Acupoint massage probably reduces the risk of mastitis compared to routine care (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.78;1 trial; 400 women; moderate-certainty evidence) and breast pain (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.23; 1 trial; 400 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events were not reported. Breast massage and low frequency pulse treatment versus routine care Breast massage and low frequency pulse treatment may reduce risk of mastitis (RR 0.03, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.21; 1 trial; 300 women; low-certainty evidence). Adverse events were not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence that acupoint massage is probably better than routine care, probiotics may be better than placebo, and breast massage and low frequency pulse treatment may be better than routine care for preventing mastitis. However, it is important to note that we are aware of at least one large trial investigating probiotics whose results have not been made public, therefore, the evidence presented here is incomplete. The available evidence regarding other interventions, including breastfeeding education, pharmacological treatments and alternative therapies, suggests these may be little better than routine care for preventing mastitis but our conclusions are uncertain due to the low certainty of the evidence. Future trials should recruit sufficiently large numbers of women in order to detect clinically important differences between interventions and results of future trials should be made publicly available.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Breast Feeding/adverse effects , Mastitis/prevention & control , Patient Education as Topic , Bias , Edible Grain/chemistry , Female , Fusidic Acid/administration & dosage , Humans , Massage/methods , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Neuropeptides/administration & dosage , Ointments/administration & dosage , Placebos/therapeutic use , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
14.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 77(23): 1965-1972, 2020 11 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32959059

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Colonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be detected via nasal screens. Evidence indicates that negative MRSA nasal screens may be used to de-escalate anti-MRSA antibiotics in pulmonary infections. In the ICU, universal decolonization with intranasal mupirocin is implemented to reduce MRSA infection risk. This study aimed to determine whether mupirocin administration affects the reliability of MRSA PCR nasal screens. METHODS: This retrospective study divided subjects based on timing of intranasal mupirocin administration-before and after MRSA screen. Subjects with confirmed pulmonary infection that received vancomycin, blood/respiratory cultures, and had MRSA PCR screen collected were included. Subjects with concurrent infection requiring vancomycin or MRSA infection in prior 30 days were excluded. Primary outcome of this non-inferiority study was the negative predictive value (NPV) of the screen. Secondary outcomes included the positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and specificity of the screen and duration of vancomycin. RESULTS: Ultimately, 125 subjects were included in each group. The NPV in the group receiving mupirocin before screen was 95.2%, whereas the NPV in the group receiving mupirocin after screen was 99%. The difference between groups was -3.8% (90% CI -7.8%-0.2%; p=0.31), which failed to meet non-inferiority criteria. The secondary outcomes of PPV, sensitivity and specificity of the screen were similar in both groups. The duration of vancomycin was significantly longer in subjects receiving mupirocin before screen (3 days vs. 2 days; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Intranasal mupirocin prior to the screen may reduce NPV in pulmonary infections. Approach de-escalation of vancomycin based on screen results with caution.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Administration, Intranasal , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Middle Aged , Nose/microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Vancomycin/administration & dosage
15.
J Hosp Infect ; 106(2): 332-334, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32805310

ABSTRACT

The objective was to describe French hospital nasal screening and decolonization procedures before clean surgery procedures. Information for participants was sent to the French Society for Infection Control members in June 2018. Seventy hospitals participated in the survey; 40% (N = 28) declared having institutional decolonization procedures: 64% (N = 18) in orthopaedic and 56% (N = 15) in cardiac surgeries. All hospitals used mupirocin for nasal decolonization and body decolonization with chlorhexidine (N = 16) or povidone iodine (N = 10). This study is the first to be performed in France giving information in this field. Screening/decolonization procedures are heterogeneous and the evaluation of their clinical impact remains complex.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Carrier State/microbiology , Decontamination/methods , Nose/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , France , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Povidone-Iodine/administration & dosage , Qualitative Research , Staphylococcus aureus , Surveys and Questionnaires , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
16.
Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov ; 15(2): 137-156, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32814540

ABSTRACT

AIM: To design controlled release topical delivery of mupirocin for the treatment of skin infection. BACKGROUND: Mupirocin is an antibacterial drug. Mupirocin works to kill the bacteria, which include strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. It is also used for the treatment of inflammation of a hair follicle. The half-life of mupirocin is only 20-40 min. It has very slight solubility in water. Patent literature had shown work on ointment, antibiotic composition, nasal and topical composition. Emulgel is a duel control release system for the topical delivery of hydrophobic drugs. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to formulate emulgel with controlled delivery of mupirocin using Sepineo P 600. METHODS: Soya oil, tween 80 and polyethylene glycol 400 (Oil:Surfactant:Cosurfactant) were used for emulsion formulation. Emulgel was optimized by 32 factorial design. Sepineo P 600 and hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose K4M were used as independent variables. Drug excipient compatibility analysis was carried out by FTIR, UV and DSC spectra. Emulgel was evaluated for its physical characterization, in vitro release, ex vivo release, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory study. RESULTS: DSC, UV and FTIR analysis confirmed drug excipient compatibility. FE SEM showed a size range between 228-255 nm. Zeta potential was found to be -25.1 mV, which showed good stability of the emulsion. Design expert software showed F2 as an optimized batch. Release studies indicated that the controlled release of drugs forms Sepineo P 600 gel due to its higher gelling capacity. Batch F2 showed comparable results with marketed formulation against Staphylococcus aureus. For batch F2, 40 µg/ml was the minimal inhibitory concentration. CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory study proved successful development of stably controlled release mupirocin emulgel.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Excipients/chemistry , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Administration, Cutaneous , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Chick Embryo , Chickens , Delayed-Action Preparations/administration & dosage , Delayed-Action Preparations/pharmacokinetics , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Drug Liberation , Drug Stability , Emulsions , Gels , Goats , Half-Life , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mupirocin/pharmacokinetics , Patents as Topic , Skin/drug effects , Skin/microbiology , Solubility , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/microbiology
17.
Spine Deform ; 8(5): 931-938, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32356280

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. OBJECTIVE: Can a standardized, hospital-wide care bundle decrease surgical site infection (SSI) rate in pediatric spinal deformity surgery? SSI is a major concern in pediatric spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our primary scoliosis surgeries between 1999 and 2017. In 2008, we implemented a standardized infection reduction bundle. Interventions included preoperative nares screening for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus or methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus 2 weeks preoperatively, and treatment with intranasal mupirocin when positive, a bath or shower the night before surgery, a preoperative chlorohexidine scrub, timing of standardized antibiotic administration, standardized intraoperative re-dosing of antibiotics, limiting operating room traffic, and standardized postoperative wound care. In 2011, we added intrawound vancomycin powder at wound closure. Our inclusion criteria were patients 21 years of age or less with idiopathic, neuromuscular, syndromic, or congenital scoliosis who had a primary spinal fusion or a same day anterior and posterior spine fusion with segmental spinal instrumentation of six levels or more. We compared the incidence of early (within 90 days of surgery) and late (> 91 days) SSI during the first postoperative year. RESULTS: There were 804 patients who met inclusion criteria: 404 in the non-bundle group (NBG) for cases prior to protocol change and 400 in the bundle group (BG) for cases after the protocol change. Postoperatively, there were 29 infections (7.2% of total cases) in the NBG: 9 early (2.2%) and 20 late (5.0%) while in the BG there were only 10 infection (2.5%): 6 early (1.5%) and 4 late (1.0%). The reduction in overall SSIs was statistically significant (p = 0.01). There was a trend toward decreased early infections in the BG, without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Standardized care bundles appear effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative pediatric spine SSIs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Patient Care Bundles/methods , Scoliosis/surgery , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Administration, Intranasal , Adolescent , Baths , Child , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Powders , Spinal Fusion/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Vancomycin/administration & dosage
18.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 127: 110189, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32388242

ABSTRACT

Diabetic wounds are major issues in patients with diabetes. Medicinal plants of Teucrium polium and Aloe vera have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that may be profitable for diabetic patients. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of co-administration of ointments prepared from Teucrium polium hydroethanolic extract (TPEO) and Aloe vera gel (AVGO) on excisional wound healing in a diabetic mouse model. Following the induction of diabetes and circular excisional wound (7 mm), the mice were divided into six groups, namely (Ⅰ) control mice treated with mupirocin (as a standard drug), (Ⅱ and Ⅲ) the mice treated with 5 and 10 % TPEO, (Ⅳ and Ⅴ) the mice treated with 5 and 10 % AVGO, and (Ⅵ) the mice treated with a combination of 5% TPEO and 5% AVGO (TPEO+AVGO). To investigate the wound area, we further evaluated the wound area ratio, histological analysis and the serum levels of tissue antioxidant capacity (TAC) and malondialdehyde (MDA), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), immunohistochemistry staining for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), glucose transporter-1(GLUT-1) and collagen type 1 and mRNA expression levels for VEGF, IGF-1, GLUT-1 and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2). The results showed that administration of the ointments, especially in combination form, shortened the inflammatory phase and reduced the levels of tissue MDA, TNF-α and IL-1ß compared to mupirocin group (P < 0.05). Moreover, fibroblasts proliferation, collagen deposition, VEGF, IGF-1, GLUT-1-positive cells and level of TAC, and expressions of VEGF, IGF-1, GLUT-1 and FGF-2 were significantly (P < 0.05) increased in TPEO and AVGO, and especially in the mice treated with the mixed form. Therefore, topical co-administration of TPEO + AVGO accelerated open diabetic wound healing through shortening the inflammatory phase and increasing cell proliferation and collagen deposition.


Subject(s)
Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Plant Extracts/administration & dosage , Plant Preparations/administration & dosage , Wound Healing/drug effects , Administration, Topical , Animals , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Collagen/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/drug therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Mupirocin/pharmacology , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Plant Preparations/pharmacology , Teucrium
19.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 99(1_suppl): 30S-34S, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32182136

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Only a few medications have a United States Food and Drug Administration indications for prevention and/or treatment of infections in patients with tympanic perforations or tympanostomy tubes. We examined 3 off-label agents that have become important in tympanostomy tube care hoping to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of each in experimental assays and human application. METHODS: Computerized literature review. RESULTS: (1) Oxymetazoline nasal spray applied at the time of surgery is equivalent to fluoroquinolone ear drops in the prevention of early postsurgical otorrhea and tympanostomy tube occlusion at the first postoperative visit. (2) Topical mupirocin 2% ointment is effective alone or in combination with culture-directed systemic therapy for the treatment of tympanostomy tube otorrhea caused by community-acquired, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. (3) Topical clotrimazole 1% cream is highly active against the common yeast and fungi that cause otomycosis. A single application after microscopic debridement will cure fungal tympanostomy tube otorrhea in most cases. None of these 3 agents is ototoxic in animal histological or physiological studies, and each has proved safe in long-term clinical use. CONCLUSIONS: Oxymetazoline nasal spray, mupirocin ointment, and clotrimazole cream are safe and effective as off-label medications for tympanostomy tube care in children.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Middle Ear Ventilation/adverse effects , Otitis Media with Effusion/surgery , Otitis/prevention & control , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Administration, Topical , Child , Child, Preschool , Clotrimazole/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Nasal Sprays , Off-Label Use , Otitis/microbiology , Otitis Media with Effusion/microbiology , Oxymetazoline/administration & dosage , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control
20.
JAMA ; 323(4): 319-328, 2020 01 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31886828

ABSTRACT

Importance: Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of health care-associated infections in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Parents may expose neonates to S aureus colonization, a well-established predisposing factor to invasive S aureus disease. Objective: To test whether treating parents with intranasal mupirocin and topical chlorhexidine compared with placebo would reduce transmission of S aureus from parents to neonates. Design, Setting, and Participants: Double-blinded randomized clinical trial in 2 tertiary NICUs in Baltimore, Maryland. Neonates (n = 236) with S aureus-colonized parent(s) were enrolled. The study period was November 7, 2014, through December 13, 2018. Interventions: Parents were assigned to intranasal mupirocin and 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated cloths (active treatment, n = 117) or petrolatum intranasal ointment and nonmedicated soap cloths (placebo, n = 119) for 5 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was concordant S aureus colonization by 90 days, defined as neonatal acquisition of an S aureus strain that was the same strain as a parental strain at time of screening. Secondary outcomes included neonatal acquisition of any S aureus strain and neonatal S aureus infections. Results: Among 236 randomized neonates, 208 were included in the analytic sample (55% male; 76% singleton births; mean birth weight, 1985 g [SD, 958 g]; 76% vaginal birth; mean parent age, 31 [SD, 7] years), of whom 18 were lost to follow-up. Among 190 neonates included in the analysis, 74 (38.9%) acquired S aureus colonization by 90 days, of which 42 (56.8%) had a strain concordant with a parental baseline strain. In the intervention and placebo groups, 13 of 89 neonates (14.6%) and 29 of 101 neonates (28.7%), respectively, acquired concordant S aureus colonization (risk difference, -14.1% [95% CI, -30.8% to -3.9%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.43 [95.2% CI, 0.16 to 0.79]). A total of 28 of 89 neonates (31.4%) in the intervention group and 46 of 101 (45.5%) in the control group acquired any S aureus strain (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.88]), and 1 neonate (1.1%) in the intervention group and 1 neonate (1.0%) in the control group developed an S aureus infection before colonization. Skin reactions in parents were common (4.8% intervention, 6.2% placebo). Conclusions and Relevance: In this preliminary trial of parents colonized with S aureus, treatment with intranasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine-impregnated cloths compared with placebo significantly reduced neonatal colonization with an S aureus strain concordant with a parental baseline strain. However, further research is needed to replicate these findings and to assess their generalizability. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02223520.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Parents , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Administration, Intranasal , Adult , Disease Reservoirs , Disinfection , Double-Blind Method , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/prevention & control , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Male , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...