Involvement of cerulospinal glutamatergic neurotransmission in fentanyl-induced muscular rigidity in the rat.

BACKGROUND: Investigators in the authors' laboratory previously established the critical participation of the cerulospinal noradrenergic pathway in muscular rigidity elicited by fentanyl. The identification of colocalization of glutamate with tyrosine hydroxylase in most locus ceruleus neurons suggests a role for cerulospinal glutamatergic neurotransmission in fentanyl-induced muscular rigidity. This suggestion and the subtype(s) of glutamate receptors involved were investigated here. METHODS: Electromyographic signals activated by bilateral microinjection of 2.5 microg fentanyl into the locus ceruleus were recorded differentially from the left sacrococcygeus dorsi lateralis muscle of adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. The effect of intrathecal administration at the lower lumbar spinal cord of various N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA receptor antagonists or agonists on this index of muscular rigidity was studied. Rats were under mechanical ventilation, and intravenous infusion of ketamine (30 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) was maintained until 10 min before fentanyl was administered. RESULTS: Microinjection of fentanyl bilaterally into the locus ceruleus increased the root mean square and decreased the mean power frequency values of electromyographic signals. The efficacy of fentanyl to elicit muscular rigidity in this manner was significantly reduced by previous intrathecal administration of either 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX), (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate (MK-801), D-(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (AP5), or (+/-)-3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP). Intrathecal administration of kainic acid or NMDA also resulted in significant electromyographic activation. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the cerulospinal noradrenergic mechanism, the cerulospinal glutamatergic pathway and both NMDA and non-NMDA receptors in the spinal cord may mediate fentanyl-induced muscular rigidity in the rat.

Masseter muscle rigidity and malignant hyperthermia susceptibility in pediatric patients. An update on management and diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the definition of masseter muscle rigidity (MMR) and anesthetic management after MMR. This study reports current anesthetic management after MMR, estimates the incidence of clinical malignant hyperthermia (MH) in patients with MMR, and is the first to evaluate the coincidence of MMR with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) according to the 1987 North American Malignant Hyperthermia Group protocol. METHODS: Practicing anesthesiologists referred pediatric patients for biopsy between 1986 and 1991 based on evidence of MMR after succinylcholine (1975-1991). The clinical scenario was described as MMR alone or MMR followed by signs of MH, including arterial CO2 tension > 50 mmHg, arterial pH < or = 7.25, and base deficit > 8. Patients had caffeine-halothane muscle contracture testing to determine MHS. RESULTS: Seventy patients (50 boys and 20 girls) were evaluated. Eighty-three percent (58 of 70) of anesthetics were halothane-succinylcholine. In 68% (48 of 70) of cases, the anesthetic was discontinued, whereas anesthesia was continued with nontriggering agents in 11% (8 of 70) and with triggering agents in 13% (9 of 70). Fifty-nine percent (41 of 70) of patients were diagnosed as MHS by muscle biopsy. In 7% (5 of 70) of patients, clinical MH developed within 10 min of MMR. CONCLUSIONS: This study, by using the current North American Malignant Hyperthermia Group protocol, reaffirms the high incidence (59%, 41 of 70) of MHS associated with MMR as confirmed by muscle biopsy. Of the MHS patients, 5 developed signs of clinical MH. Most anesthesiologists in this study, when confronted with MMR, discontinued anesthesia. Because of the potential lethality of MH and the > 50% concordance between MMR and MHS, the most conservative course of action after MMR is to discontinue the anesthetic and observe the patient for clinical evidence of MH. An acceptable alternative, depending on the urgency of the surgery, would be to continue anesthesia with nontriggering agents for MH, with appropriate monitoring.