Performance of the 2017 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies in Patients With Myositis-Specific Autoantibodies.

OBJECTIVE: We undertook this study to 1) determine the sensitivity of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) to properly classify myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA)-positive myositis patients, 2) describe the phenotype and muscle involvement over time in different MSA-positive patients, and 3) compare MSA subgroups to EULAR/ACR criteria-defined myositis subgroups for their capacity to predict clinical phenotypes in patients with IIMs. METHODS: The study included 524 MSA-positive myositis patients from the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center. Each patient was classified using the EULAR/ACR classification criteria. Patient phenotypes were summarized using factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD). We compared the ability of MSAs to that of the EULAR/ACR classification subgroups to predict the phenotype of patients by applying the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criteria (BIC) to the linear regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 91% of MSA-positive patients met the EULAR/ACR criteria to be classified as having myositis. However, 20% of patients with anti-hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (anti-HMGCR) and 50% of patients with anti-PL-7 were incorrectly classified as not having myositis. Furthermore, ~10% of patients with anti-signal recognition particle (anti-SRP) and patients with anti-HMGCR were misclassified as having inclusion body myositis. FAMD demonstrated that patients within each MSA-defined subgroup had similar phenotypes. Application of both the AIC and BIC to the linear regression models revealed that MSAs were better predictors of myositis phenotypes than the subgroups defined by the EULAR/ACR criteria. CONCLUSION: Although the EULAR/ACR criteria successfully classified 91% of MSA-positive myositis patients, certain MSA-defined subgroups, including those with autoantibodies against HMGCR, SRP, and PL-7, are frequently misclassified. In myositis patients with MSAs, autoantibodies outperform the EULAR/ACR-defined myositis subgroups in predicting the clinical phenotypes of patients. These findings underscore the need to include MSAs in a revised myositis classification scheme.

Miopatía necrosante inmunomediada seronegativa con afectación miocárdica / Seronegative immune-mediated necrotising myopathy with myocardial involvement

No disponible

A network of core and subtype-specific gene expression programs in myositis.

Myositis comprises a heterogeneous group of skeletal muscle disorders which converge on chronic muscle inflammation and weakness. Our understanding of myositis pathogenesis is limited, and many myositis patients lack effective therapies. Using muscle biopsy transcriptome profiles from 119 myositis patients (spanning major clinical and serological disease subtypes) and 20 normal controls, we generated a co-expression network of 8101 dynamically regulated transcripts. This network organized the myositis transcriptome into a map of gene expression modules representing interrelated biological processes and disease signatures. Universally myositis-upregulated network modules included muscle regeneration, specific cytokine signatures, the acute phase response, and neutrophil degranulation. Universally myositis-suppressed pathways included a specific subset of myofilaments, the mitochondrial envelope, and nuclear isoforms of the anti-apoptotic humanin protein. Myositis subtype-specific modules included type 1 interferon signaling and titin (dermatomyositis), RNA processing (antisynthetase syndrome), and vasculogenesis (inclusion body myositis). Importantly, therapies exist to target influential proteins in many myositis-dysregulated modules, and nearly all modules contained understudied proteins and non-coding RNAs - many of which were extraordinarily dysregulated in myositis and may represent novel therapeutic targets. Finally, we apply our network to patient classification, finding that a deep learning algorithm trained on patient-level network "images" successfully assigned patients to clinical groups and further into molecular subclusters. Altogether, we provide a global resource to probe and contextualize differential gene expression in myositis.

Miopatía necrotizante autoinmune: Presentación de un caso clínico / Autoimmune necrotizing myositis: Presentation of a clinical case

Las miopatías inflamatorias (MI) son un grupo heterogéneo de enfermedades musculares de rara ocurrencia, caracterizadas por inflamación de los distintos componentes del tejido muscular, ya sea de forma aislada o, más comúnmente, en el contexto de una afección sistémica. Las miopatías necrotizantes inmunomediadas (MNIM) constituyen un subtipo de miopatía inflamatoria caracterizada por debilidad muscular proximal, necrosis de miofibrillas con mínimo infiltrado celular inflamatorio en la biopsia muscular e infrecuente compromiso extramuscular asociado1. Si bien existen similitudes clínicas e histopatológicas, el espectro de las miopatías inflamatorias es considerablemente variable. Por este motivo, es fundamental realizar estudios complementarios para la identificación correcta del subtipo de MI a fin de determinar su pronóstico e implementar un adecuado tratamiento. Se presenta el caso de una paciente de 29 años, sin antecedentes personales y heredofamiliares de enfermedad autoinmune ni antecedentes patológicos relevantes, que consulta a la Guardia Médica de nuestra Institución por un cuadro de dolor e impotencia funcional en los cuatro miembros, con debilidad muscular a predominio de cintura escapular y en menor medida pelviana, acompañado de astenia, tendencia al sueño e hiporreactividad.

Inflammatory myopathies (IM) or myositis are a heterogeneous group of muscle diseases of rare occurrence. Such diseases are characterized by inflammation of the different components of muscle tissue, which can occur either in isolation or, more commonly, as part of a systemic disorder. Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies (IMNM) are a type of autoimmune myopathy characterized by proximal muscle weakness, myofiber necrosis with minimal inflammatory cell infiltrate on muscle biopsy and infrequent extramuscular involvement1. Even though there are clinical and histopathological similarities. The spectrum of inflammatory myopathies is considerably variable. Therefore, the performance of complementary studies is essential for the proper identification of the IM subtype to contribute accurately on treatment so determine the better prognosis. The present article shows the case of a young 29 years old, with no personal and family history background of autoimmune disease and no relevant pathological background. The patient consulted the medical ward of the Institution with pain, functional impairment of upper and lower extremities, muscle weakness mainly located in the pectoral girdle area and, although to a lesser degree, in the pelvic girdle area. It was also associated with asthenia, tendency to drowsiness and hyporeactivity.

Performance of myositis-specific antibodies detected on myositis line immunoassay to diagnose and sub-classify patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, a retrospective records-based review.

AIM: To evaluate myositis line immunoassay (LIA) for diagnosis and sub-classification of suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). To investigate if test performance is improved by increasing signal strength cut-off for myositis-specific antibody (MSA) or combining MSA with indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). METHODS: A retrospective, consecutive case series of patients investigated for MSAs from June 2013 to June 2020 for suspected IIM. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated with 95% confidence intervals for diagnosis of IIM. Association of IIM diagnosis with increased signal strength and presence of an expected IIF pattern on Hep-2 cells was assessed by Fisher's exact test in MSA-positive patients. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were evaluated. IIM was diagnosed in 32/195 (16.4%) patients. MSAs were detected in 41/195 (21%) patients, 18/41 (43.9%) patients with an MSA had a diagnosis of IIM. The probability of an IIM diagnosis was increased in MSA-positive patients with high compared with low signal strength (83.3% vs 43.5%; P = 0.01) and an expected compared with unexpected IIF pattern (61.5% vs 23.8%; P = 0.04). Specificity for IIM was not significantly improved by increasing signal strength cut-off (85.9% vs 93.8%). Positive predictive value of myositis LIA was only modest and not significantly improved by either increasing signal strength cut-off or requiring an expected IIF pattern for determination of MSA positivity (43.9% vs 60% vs 61.5%). Sub-classification of IIM correlated closely for respective MSAs (88.9%). CONCLUSION: Increased MSA signal strength on myositis LIA and the presence of an expected IIF pattern were associated with IIM diagnosis. Test performance was non-significantly improved by these methods. Prevalence of IIM in this patient cohort was low; it is not excluded that LIA performance could be improved by these methods in a higher prevalence cohort.

A novel grey scale and Power Doppler ultrasonographic score for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Siena Myositis Ultrasound Grading Scale.

OBJECTIVES: No clear-cut guidelines exist on the use of diagnostic procedures for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and only minimal and conflicting data report the use of ultrasound (US). In this regard, we aimed to assess if grey-scale (GS) and Power Doppler (PD) US, graded with a 0-3-point scale, may be a reliable tool in a cohort of patients affected by IIM. METHODS: All patients underwent US examination of both thighs in axial and longitudinal scans. Oedema and atrophy, both assessed in GS and PD, were graded with a 0-3-point scale. Spearman's test was used to identify the correlations between US and clinical and serological variables. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included. Six and two patients were evaluated twice and three times, respectively. Muscle oedema was found to be directly correlated with physician global assessment (PhGA), serum myoglobin and PD and negatively with disease duration. PD score was positively correlated to PhGA and negatively to disease duration. Muscle atrophy directly correlated with Myositis Damage Index, disease duration and patient's age. The single-thigh sub-analysis evidenced a direct correlation between PD score and Manual Muscle Test. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, we found that oedema and PD are strictly related to early, active myositis, suggesting that an inflamed muscle should appear swollen, thickened and with Doppler signal. Conversely, muscle atrophy reflects the age of the patient and the overall severity of the disease. Such findings shed a new, promising, light on the role of US in diagnosis and monitoring of IIMs.

Myositis-specific autoantibodies and their clinical associations in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

BACKGROUND: Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) have been found to be present predominantly in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of MSAs and their associated complications in a cohort of patients with IIMs. METHODS: This was a multicentered prospective study. Consecutive adult Chinese patients with IIMs in the regional hospitals in Hong Kong were followed up from July 2016 to January 2018. Clinical characteristics, treatment history, and disease complications were documented. A commercially available immunoblot assay was used to detect the MSAs. RESULTS: Out of the 201 patients studied, at least one MSA was found in 63.2% of patients. The most common among the identified MSAs were the anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody (anti-MDA5 Ab) and the anti-transcriptional intermediary factor 1-gamma antibody (anti-TIF1-γ Ab) (both 13.9%), followed by anti-Jo-1 antibody (12.4%). Anti-MDA5 was present exclusively in dermatomyositis (DM) and was strongly associated with digital ulcers, amyopathy, and rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD). Anti-TIF1γ was strongly associated with refractory rash and malignancy. Independent risk factors of RP-ILD included anti-MDA5 (OR 14.5), clinically amyopathic DM (OR 13.9), and history of pulmonary tuberculosis (OR 12.2). Cox regression analysis showed that anti-TIF1γ (HR 3.55), DM (HR 3.82), and family history of cancer (HR 3.40) were independent predictors of malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: MSA testing enables dividing of patients with IIMs into phenotypically homogeneous subgroups and prediction of potentially life-threatening complications.

External validation of the EULAR/ACR idiopathic inflammatory myopathies classification criteria with a Japanese paediatric cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of the EULAR/ACR idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) classification criteria to classify juvenile IIMs (JIIMs) in an Asian paediatric population. METHODS: Sixty-eight JIIM patients and 49 non-JIIM patients diagnosed at seven major paediatric rheumatology centres in Japan between 2008 and 2015 were enrolled. Retrospective data were collected, and each patient's data form was submitted. The expert group reviewed the forms and re-examined the diagnoses. The EULAR/ACR criteria were then applied and the probability of having JIIM was determined for each case. The sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR criteria were compared with those of other existing criteria. RESULTS: The sensitivity/specificity of the EULAR/ACR classification criteria were 92.1/100% with muscle biopsy data (n = 38); 86.7/100% without muscle biopsy data (n = 30) and 89.7/100% in our total cohort (n = 68). The sensitivity of Bohan and Peter's criteria and Tanimoto's criteria were 80.9 and 64.7% in our total cohort, respectively. Among 68 physician-diagnosed JIIM patients, seven cases (three JDM and four overlap myositis) were not classified as JIIM because the probability did not reach the cut-off point (55%). The three JDM patients all presented with only one of the three skin manifestations that are listed in the criteria: Gottron's sign. CONCLUSION: Our validation study with Japanese JIIM cases indicates that the EULAR/ACR classification criteria for IIM generally perform better than existing diagnostic criteria for myositis.

Teleconsultation experience with the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a prospective observational cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Teleconsultation has assumed a central role in the management of chronic and disabling rheumatic diseases, such as the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), during COVID-19. However, the feasibility, challenges encountered, and outcomes remain largely unexplored. Here, we describe our teleconsultation experience in a prospectively followed cohort of adult and juvenile IIM. 250 IIM enrolled into the MyoCite cohort (2017-ongoing) were offered the option of audio/visual teleconsultation using WhatsApp during the nationwide lockdown. Clinical outcomes (major/minor relapse) and prescription changes were compared between IIM subsets. Socio-demographic and clinico-serological characteristics of those who sought teleconsultation were compared with those who did not. 151 teleconsultations were sought over a 93 day period by 71 (52.2%) of 136 IIM (median age 38 years, F:M 4.5:1). Nearly one-third (38%) consulted on an emergency basis, with voice consultations being the primary medium of communication. Over a quarter (26.8%) reported relapse (15.5% minor, 11.3% major), these being more common in JDM [71.4%, OR 8.9 (1.5-51)] as compared with adult IIM, but similar across various antibody-based IIM subtypes. Patients who relapsed required more consultations [2(2-3) vs 1(1-2), p 0.009]. The demographic and socioeconomic profile of the patients seeking consultation (n = 71) was not different from those who did not (n = 65). Voice-based teleconsultations may be useful to diagnose and manage relapses in IIM during the pandemic. Patient education for meticulous and timely reporting may be improve care, and larger multicentre studies may identify subsets of IIM that require greater care and early tele-triage for effective management of the condition.

Where are we moving in the classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Discoveries of myositis-specific antibodies, transcriptomic signatures, and clinicoseropathological correlation support classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) into four major subgroups: dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), antisynthetase syndrome (ASS), and inclusion body myositis (IBM) whereas leaving polymyositis as a historical nonspecific diagnosis of exclusion. This review summarizes and comments on recent knowledge regarding the major subgroup of IIM. RECENT FINDINGS: Type 1 interferon (IFN1) pathway activation is the most prominent in dermatomyositis whereas type 2 interferon (IFN2) pathway activation is high in IBM and ASS; neither pathway is distinct in IMNM. Myxovirus-resistant protein A, IFN1 surrogate marker, is now one of definite dermatomyositis muscle biopsy criteria in the new 2018 European Neuromuscular Centre classification of dermatomyositis; the classification emphasizes on different categorization with and without dermatomyositis-specific antibody result. Novel HLA loci associated with anti-TIF1-γ, anti-Mi-2, and anti-Jo-1 antibodies in Caucasian population are identified. Associations of chaperon-assisted selective autophagy (CASA) and complement-mediated autoimmunity in IMNM as well as highly differentiated T cells in IBM are discovered. SUMMARY: Current IIM classification requires integrated clinicoseropathological approaches. Additional information, such as transcriptomics, HLA haplotyping, and potential biomarkers help tailoring categorization that may have future diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

[Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies]. / Idiopathische inflammatorische Myopathien.

Myositis is a rare and an extremely heterogeneous autoimmune disease, that causes muscle weakness. Currently, "idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM)" is the preferred umbrella-term used to describe the disease complexity within individuals. IIM include dermatomyositis, polymyositis, inclusion body myositis, autoimmune necrotizing myopathy, overlap myositis and antisynthetase syndrome. Research activity concerning myositis was very intense over the past ten years and led to new diagnostic approach as well as to novel therapeutic strategies. Correct classification is the key for successful management. One single treatment regime for every possible organ involvement in all different forms of IIM is still not existing.

Trends in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: cross-sectional data from the German National Database.

OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in outcomes among patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) over two decades. METHODS: From 1997 to 2017, a total of 1079 IIM patients were documented in the National Database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centers. Annual cross-sectional data on treatment, disease activity, patient-reported outcomes, hospitalization and employment were compared across the years. Information on phenotypes, organ manifestations and autoantibodies was collected for a subset to compare the assessment of global health, pain, fatigue and sleeping disorders. RESULTS: In 2017, significantly more IIM patients were assessed to be in low disease activity (94%) than in 1997 (59%), p < 0.01. Pain (p = 0.001), global health (p = 0.049), fatigue (p = 0.03) and sleeping disorders (p = 0.01) also improved since recording. Glucocorticoid use decreased from 84 to 58% (p < 0.01). Employment in patients < 65 years remained unchanged (53%), while early retirement (23-9%), hospitalization/year (34-18%) and sick leave (52-24%) decreased. A total of 186 patients with information on subtypes were classified as polymyositis (44%), dermatomyositis (33%), anti-synthetase syndrome (10%), overlapping-myositis (8%), inclusion body myositis (2%), necrotizing myositis (0.5%) and unspecific (3%). The most frequently reported symptoms were limitations in global health (60%), fatigue (57%) and sleeping disorders (51%), and all of them were most frequent in overlap-myositis. Pulmonary hypertension and cardiomyopathy were associated with poor outcomes regarding global health, daily activities and fatigue. CONCLUSION: IIM patients report better outcomes than 20 years ago, along with good physician-reported disease control. Global health, fatigue and sleeping disorders are relevant patient-reported domains in IIM.

Analysis of myositis autoantibodies in Chinese patients with cancer-associated myositis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated myositis (CAM) has poor prognosis and causes higher mortality. In general, myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs) have been shown to be useful biomarkers for its diagnosis. METHODS: In the present study, focus was given in assessing the presence, prevalence, and diagnostic values of myositis autoantibodies in Chinese patients diagnosed with CAM. The sera collected from 49 CAM patients, 108 dermatomyositis/polymyositis (DM/PM) patients without cancer, 105 disease controls, and 60 healthy controls were detected for the presence of 16 autoantigens (Jo-1, OJ, EJ, PL-7, PL-12, MDA5, TIF1γ, Mi-2α, Mi-2ß, SAE1, NXP2, SRP, Ku, PM-Scl75, PM-Scl100, and Ro-52) using a commercial Euroline assay. RESULTS: The frequency of anti-TIF1γ was significantly higher in CAM patients than in DM/PM patients without cancer (46.9% vs 14.8%, P < .001). Importantly, the sensitivity and specificity for this MSA were 46.9% and 85.2%, respectively. These helped to differentiate CAM patients from DM/PM patients without cancer. However, there was no difference in other MSAs and MAAs between CAM and DM/PM patients without cancer. CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that anti-TIF1γ levels can serve as important biomarkers for CAM diagnosis and help in distinguishing between CAM and DM/PM patients without cancer.

Performance of the new EULAR/ACR classification criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) in a large monocentric IIM cohort.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) published new classification criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). OBJECTIVES: To [1] assess the performance of the EULAR/ACR criteria in a monocentric cohort of consecutive patients with IIM, compare them with the Bohan and Peter (BP) criteria, and with the physician's diagnosis; and [2] evaluate the effect of including the presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) as variable in the criteria. METHODS: 439 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of IIM followed at the Rheumatology Clinic, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden were enrolled. The patients were diagnosed as IIM and subclassified by expert physicians. Clinical, laboratory, serological and histopathological data were collected from existing databases (Euromyositis registry and Swedish Rheumatology quality registry) and clinical charts of the patients. The sensitivity of the EULAR/ACR and the BP criteria was calculated. RESULTS: The EULAR/ACR criteria had a higher sensitivity (87.7%) compared to the BP criteria (80.4%). The concordance between the two sets of criteria was low (k = 0.253 p<0.001). The EULAR/ACR criteria showed a very high specificity (>98%) for the major IIM subgroups polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and inclusion body myositis. The sensitivity was variable and was high in inclusion body myositis (98%), dermatomyositis (90%) and lower in polymyositis (73%). When including ILD in the variables of the criteria, six more patients were classified as IIM cases (1.3%). CONCLUSION: The EULAR/ACR criteria for IIM are applicable with high sensitivity and specificity using data available from existing databases and clinical charts and represent a major step forward from the previous criteria for IIM and its subgroups. Their application will improve the quality of clinical trials and research studies with IIM patients.

First external validation of sensitivity and specificity of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies with a Japanese cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To externally validate the performance of the new European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria set for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) with a Japanese cohort. METHODS: This study included 420 IIM and 402 non-IIM cases. Probability of having IIM in each patient was calculated using the collected data set. The cut-off probability was set at 55%, as recommended by EULAR/ACR. Patients classified as IIM by the criteria were further subclassified with classification trees. RESULTS: When the probability cut-off was set at 55%, the sensitivity/specificity of the new criteria to diagnose IIM were 89.3%/91.0% in the total cohort, 88.1%/95.1% without muscle biopsy data and 90.4%/65.5% with biopsy data. The cohort included 12 overlap syndrome patients with biopsy data, who were included as non-IIM cases in accordance with traditional Japanese methods. When they were included in the IIM cases, the specificity in patients with biopsy increased to 74.4%. The sensitivity/specificity of the new criteria to diagnose polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM) plus juvenile and amyopathic DM in the Japanese cohort was 87.4%/92.4%, which were greater than those of the Tanimoto's criteria revised to enable classification of amyopathic DM (ADM) (71.2%/87.8%) and were comparable with those of Bohan & Peter's criteria to diagnose those diseases except for ADM (88.4%/88.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study externally validated high specificity of the new criteria for the first time, although with several limitations, including low percentage of child patients. The new criteria have higher sensitivity and/or specificity in classification of PM/DM than the previously reported criteria, demonstrating its usefulness for interethnic patients.

Classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: pathology perspectives.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are rare diseases with heterogenous clinicopathological features. In recent years, new classification systems considering various combinations of clinical, serological, and pathological information have been proposed. This review summarizes recent clinicoseropathological development in major subgroups of IIM. RECENT FINDINGS: Considering clinicoseropathological features, IIM are suggestively classified into four major subgroups: dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), antisynthetase syndrome (ASS), and inclusion body myositis (IBM). Many historically diagnosed polymyositis have been mainly reclassified as IBM, IMNM, and ASS. Different types of myositis-specific antibodies (MSA) suggest distinct clinicopathological subsets of IIM. Excluding IBM, at least one-third of the IIMs have no known associated MSA. SUMMARY: MSA are crucial for IIM classification but can be negative. Thus, IIM should be universally classified using stepwise or integrated information on clinical, serological, and pathological findings.