2,8-Disubstituted-1,5-naphthyridines as Dual Inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum Phosphatidylinositol-4-kinase and Hemozoin Formation with In Vivo Efficacy.

Structure-activity relationship studies of 2,8-disubstituted-1,5-naphthyridines, previously reported as potent inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) phosphatidylinositol-4-kinase ß (PI4K), identified 1,5-naphthyridines with basic groups at 8-position, which retained Plasmodium PI4K inhibitory activity but switched primary mode of action to the host hemoglobin degradation pathway through inhibition of hemozoin formation. These compounds showed minimal off-target inhibitory activity against the human phosphoinositide kinases and MINK1 and MAP4K kinases, which were associated with the teratogenicity and testicular toxicity observed in rats for the PfPI4K inhibitor clinical candidate MMV390048. A representative compound from the series retained activity against field isolates and lab-raised drug-resistant strains of Pf. It was efficacious in the humanized NSG mouse malaria infection model at a single oral dose of 32 mg/kg. This compound was nonteratogenic in the zebrafish embryo model of teratogenicity and has a low predicted human dose, indicating that this series has the potential to deliver a preclinical candidate for malaria.

Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Finerenone Improves Diastolic Dysfunction in Preclinical Nondiabetic Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: The mineralocorticoid receptor plays a significant role in the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and associated cardiovascular complications. Classic steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are a therapeutic option, but their use in the clinic is limited due to the associated risk of hyperkalemia in patients with CKD. Finerenone is a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that has been recently investigated in 2 large phase III clinical trials (FIDELIO-DKD [Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease] and FIGARO-DKD [Finerenone in Reducing Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease]), showing reductions in kidney and cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We tested whether finerenone improves renal and cardiac function in a preclinical nondiabetic CKD model. Twelve weeks after 5/6 nephrectomy, the rats showed classic signs of CKD characterized by a reduced glomerular filtration rate and increased kidney weight, associated with left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction and decreased LV perfusion. These changes were associated with increased cardiac fibrosis and reduced endothelial nitric oxide synthase activating phosphorylation (ser 1177). Treatment with finerenone prevented LV diastolic dysfunction and increased LV tissue perfusion associated with a reduction in cardiac fibrosis and increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation. Curative treatment with finerenone improves nondiabetic CKD-related LV diastolic function associated with a reduction in cardiac fibrosis and increased cardiac phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase independently from changes in kidney function. Short-term finerenone treatment decreased LV end-diastolic pressure volume relationship and increased phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide synthase activity. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone reduces renal hypertrophy and albuminuria, attenuates cardiac diastolic dysfunction and cardiac fibrosis, and improves cardiac perfusion in a preclinical nondiabetic CKD model.

Baseline characteristics of patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: The FINEARTS-HF trial.

AIMS: To describe the baseline characteristics of participants in the FINEARTS-HF trial, contextualized with prior trials including patients with heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF). The FINEARTS-HF trial is comparing the effects of the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone with placebo in reducing cardiovascular death and total worsening HF events in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with symptomatic HF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40%, estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 25 ml/min/1.73 m2, elevated natriuretic peptide levels and evidence of structural heart disease were enrolled and randomized to finerenone titrated to a maximum of 40 mg once daily or matching placebo. We validly randomized 6001 patients to finerenone or placebo (mean age 72 ± 10 years, 46% women). The majority were New York Heart Association functional class II (69%). The baseline mean LVEF was 53 ± 8% (range 34-84%); 36% of participants had a LVEF <50% and 64% had a LVEF ≥50%. The median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was 1041 (interquartile range 449-1946) pg/ml. A total of 1219 (20%) patients were enrolled during or within 7 days of a worsening HF event, and 3247 (54%) patients were enrolled within 3 months of a worsening HF event. Compared with prior large-scale HFmrEF/HFpEF trials, FINEARTS-HF participants were more likely to have recent (within 6 months) HF hospitalization and greater symptoms and functional limitations. Further, concomitant medications included a larger percentage of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors than previous trials. CONCLUSIONS: FINEARTS-HF has enrolled a broad range of high-risk patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF. The trial will determine the safety and efficacy of finerenone in this population.

Finerenone in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: Rationale and design of the FINEARTS-HF trial.

AIM: Steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), spironolactone and eplerenone, are strongly recommended in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but the balance of efficacy and safety in those with higher LVEF has not been well established. Broad use of steroidal MRAs has further been limited in part due to safety concerns around risks of hyperkalaemia, gynecomastia, and kidney dysfunction. These risks may be mitigated by the unique pharmacological properties of the non-steroidal MRA finerenone. The FINEARTS-HF trial is designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of the selective non-steroidal MRA finerenone among patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. METHODS: FINEARTS-HF is a global, multicentre, event-driven randomized trial evaluating oral finerenone versus matching placebo in symptomatic patients with HF with LVEF ≥40%. Adults (≥40 years) with HF with New York Heart Association class II-IV symptoms, LVEF ≥40%, evidence of structural heart disease, and diuretic use for at least the previous 30 days were eligible. All patients required elevated natriuretic peptide levels: for patients in sinus rhythm, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) ≥300 pg/ml (or B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] ≥100 pg/ml) were required, measured within 30 days (in those without a recent worsening HF event) or within 90 days (in those with a recent worsening HF event). Qualifying levels of NT-proBNP or BNP were tripled if a patient was in atrial fibrillation at screening. Estimated glomerular filtration rate <25 ml/min/1.73 m2 or serum potassium >5.0 mmol/L were key exclusion criteria. Patients were enrolled irrespective of clinical care setting (whether hospitalized, recently hospitalized, or ambulatory). The primary endpoint is the composite of cardiovascular death and total (first and recurrent) HF events. The trial started on 14 September 2020 and has validly randomized 6001 participants across 37 countries. Approximately 2375 total primary composite events are targeted. CONCLUSIONS: The FINEARTS-HF trial will determine the efficacy and safety of the non-steroidal MRA finerenone in a broad population of hospitalized and ambulatory patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04435626 and EudraCT 2020-000306-29.

Characterising the blood-stage antimalarial activity of pyronaridine in healthy volunteers experimentally infected with Plasmodium falciparum.

With the spread of artemisinin resistance throughout Southeast Asia and now in Africa, the antimalarial drug pyronaridine is likely to become an increasingly important component of new antimalarial drug regimens. However, the antimalarial activity of pyronaridine in humans has not been completely characterised. This volunteer infection study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship of pyronaridine in malaria naïve adults. Volunteers were inoculated with Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes on day 0 and administered different single oral doses of pyronaridine on day 8. Parasitaemia and concentrations of pyronaridine were measured and standard safety assessments performed. Curative artemether-lumefantrine therapy was administered if parasite regrowth occurred, or on day 47 ± 2. Outcomes were parasite clearance kinetics, PK and PK/PD parameters from modelling. Ten participants were inoculated and administered 360 mg (n = 4), 540 mg (n = 4) or 720 mg (n = 1) pyronaridine. One participant was withdrawn without receiving pyronaridine. The time to maximum pyronaridine concentration was 1-2 h, the elimination half-life was 8-9 d, and the parasite clearance half-life was approximately 5 h. Parasite regrowth occurred with 360 mg (4/4 participants) and 540 mg (2/4 participants). Key efficacy parameters including the minimum inhibitory concentration (5.5 ng/mL) and minimum parasiticidal concentration leading to 90% of maximum effect (MPC90: 8 ng/mL) were derived from the PK/PD model. Adverse events considered related to pyronaridine were predominantly mild to moderate gastrointestinal symptoms. There were no serious adverse events. Data obtained in this study will support the use of pyronaridine in new antimalarial combination therapies by informing partner drug selection and dosing considerations.

Discovery of 2,6-Naphthyridine Analogues as Selective FGFR4 Inhibitors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer and is responsible for 90% of cases. Approximately 30% of patients diagnosed with HCC are identified as displaying an aberrant expression of fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19)-fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) as an oncogenic-driver pathway. Therefore, the control of the FGF19-FGFR4 signaling pathway with selective FGFR4 inhibitors can be a promising therapy for the treatment of HCC. We herein disclose the design and synthesis of novel FGFR4 inhibitors containing a 2,6-naphthyridine scaffold. Compound 11 displayed a nanomolar potency against Huh7 cell lines and high selectivity over FGFR1-3 that were comparable to that of fisogatinib (8) as a reference standard. Additionally, compound 11 demonstrated remarkable antitumor efficacy in the Huh7 and Hep3B HCC xenograft mouse model. Moreover, bioluminescence imaging experiments with the orthotopic mouse model support that compound 11 can be considered a promising candidate for treating HCC.

Cardiorenal Benefits of Finerenone in Different Races and Kidney Function in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: The mineralocorticoid receptor plays an important pathophysiological role in cardiorenal diseases by causing inflammation and fibrosis. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are well known in treating cardiovascular disease and diverse nephropathies. However, the first-generation MRA (spironolactone) and the second-generation MRA (eplerenone) remain underutilized because of the risk of inducing severe adverse events. As a selective nonsteroidal MRA, finerenone is safer and more effective and improves cardiorenal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the effect of finerenone on cardiorenal outcomes in patients of different races and kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) is unclear. SUMMARY: In this review, we summarized the impact of finerenone on patients with CKD and T2DM from randomized controlled trials. The synthesis of published data aims to address the questions pertaining to the cardiorenal benefits of finerenone among various racial groups and different levels of kidney function. KEY MESSAGE: Finerenone presents racial differences and effects associated with kidney function in CKD and T2DM patients. Due to the limited data for subgroups, it is prudent to approach the conclusion with caution.

Finerenone cardiovascular and kidney outcomes by age and sex: FIDELITY post hoc analysis of two phase 3, multicentre, double-blind trials.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of finerenone, a selective, non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes by age and/or sex. DESIGN: FIDELITY post hoc analysis; median follow-up of 3 years. SETTING: FIDELITY: a prespecified analysis of the FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD trials. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease receiving optimised renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (N=13 026). INTERVENTIONS: Randomised 1:1; finerenone or placebo. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiovascular (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF)) and kidney (kidney failure, sustained ≥57% estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline or renal death) composite outcomes. RESULTS: Mean age was 64.8 years; 45.2%, 40.1% and 14.7% were aged <65, 65-74 and ≥75 years, respectively; 69.8% were male. Cardiovascular benefits of finerenone versus placebo were consistent across age (HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.10) (<65 years), HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.98) (65-74 years), HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.99) (≥75 years); Pinteraction=0.42) and sex categories (HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.96) (male), HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.35 to 2.27) (premenopausal female), HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.05) (postmenopausal female); Pinteraction=0.99). Effects on HHF reduction were not modified by age (Pinteraction=0.70) but appeared more pronounced in males (Pinteraction=0.02). Kidney events were reduced with finerenone versus placebo in age groups <65 and 65-74 but not ≥75; no heterogeneity in treatment effect was observed (Pinteraction=0.51). In sex subgroups, finerenone consistently reduced kidney events (Pinteraction=0.85). Finerenone reduced albuminuria and eGFR decline regardless of age and sex. Hyperkalaemia increased with finerenone, but discontinuation rates were <3% across subgroups. Gynaecomastia in males was uncommon across age subgroups and identical between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Finerenone improved cardiovascular and kidney composite outcomes with no significant heterogeneity between age and sex subgroups; however, the effect on HHF appeared more pronounced in males. Finerenone demonstrated a similar safety profile across age and sex subgroups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02540993, NCT02545049.

Non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists and hyperkalemia monitoring in chronic kidney disease patients associated with type II diabetes: a narrative review.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a prevalent complication of Type II diabetes (T2D). The coexistence of CKD with T2D is comparable to cardiovascular disease (CVD) when the estimated glomerular filtration rate declines below 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Screening and early detection of people with high risk for CKD would be beneficial in managing CKD progress and the associated complications such as CV complications. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) have demonstrated beneficial effects in delaying CKD progression, but they carry the risk of hyperkalemia. Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists (nsMRA), such as finerenone, exhibit considerable efficacy in their anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and renal protective effects with demonstrable reductions in CV complications. In addition, nsMRAs do not cause significant changes in serum potassium levels compared to traditional steroidal MRA. Ongoing research explores the capacity of the sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), combined with nsMRA, to produce synergistic renal protective effects and reduce the risk of hyperkalemia. Also, a dedicated renal outcomes study (FLOW study) involving a once-weekly injectable Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, semaglutide, was halted early by the data monitoring committee due to having achieved the predefined efficacy endpoint and considerations related to renal disease. In CKD patients with T2D on nsMRA, hyperkalemia management requires a comprehensive approach involving lifestyle adjustments, dietary modifications, regular serum potassium level monitoring, and potassium binders, if necessary. Withholding or down-titration of nsMRAs with close monitoring of serum potassium levels may be required in patients with concerning potassium levels. In light of the current state of knowledge, this review article explores the perspectives and approaches that HCPs may consider when monitoring and managing hyperkalemia in CKD patients with T2D.

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a common and serious problem among people with Type II Diabetes (T2D). People who have CKD with T2D are at a higher risk for heart disease after normal kidney function declines below certain levels. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors are a group of medications that can help delay CKD progression but may cause a rise in circulating potassium levels. Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist (nsMRA), such as finerenone, can reduce kidney inflammation and damage, with noted cardiovascular benefits, and with less effect on serum potassium levels as compared to their steroid-based counterparts. Researchers are studying whether combining blood sugar medications such as sodium-glucose transport protein-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and finerenone can help protect the kidneys and heart. They also want to see if this combination can prevent high potassium levels. This article talks about ways to check and monitor potassium levels in CKD patients with T2D who may be taking nsMRA. To manage high potassium levels in people with CKD and T2D, doctors may suggest lifestyle changes, dietary adjustments, potassium-lowering medication, or adjustment of other medications with close monitoring of potassium levels.

When to use spironolactone, eplerenone or finerenone in the spectrum of cardiorenal diseases.

Kidney disease frequently coexists with cardiovascular (CV) diseases, and this dual presence significantly amplifies the risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Shared pathophysiological mechanisms and common CV risk factors contribute to the increased expression of mineralocorticoid receptors, which in turn can drive the progression of chronic CV-kidney disorders. The steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) spironolactone and eplerenone have demonstrated efficacy in improving patient outcomes in cases of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction or after a myocardial infarction, but have limited value in patients with chronic kidney disease. The non-steroidal MRA finerenone has now established itself as a foundational guideline-recommended therapy in patients with diabetic kidney disease. To date, these pharmacological agents have been developed in distinct patient populations. The consequences of their distinct pharmacological profiles necessitate further consideration. They have not undergone testing across the entire spectrum of cardiorenal scenarios, and the evidence base is currently being complemented with ongoing trials. In this review, we aim to synthesize the existing body of evidence and chart the future trajectory for the use of spironolactone, eplerenone and finerenone in improving clinical outcomes across the diverse spectrum of cardiorenal diseases. By consolidating the current state of knowledge, we seek to provide valuable insights for informed decision making in the management of patients with these complex and interconnected conditions.

Structure-Activity Relationships and Discovery of (S)-6-Isopropyl-2-methoxy-3-(3-methoxypropoxy)-10-oxo-5,10-dihydro-6H-pyrido[1,2-h][1,7]naphthyridine-9-carboxylic Acid (AB-452), a Novel Orally Available HBV RNA Destabilizer.

Approved therapies for hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment include nucleos(t)ides and interferon alpha (IFN-α) which effectively suppress viral replication, but they rarely lead to cure. Expression of viral proteins, especially surface antigen of the hepatitis B virus (HBsAg) from covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and the integrated genome, is believed to contribute to the persistence of HBV. This work focuses on therapies that target the expression of HBV proteins, in particular HBsAg, which differs from current treatments. Here we describe the identification of AB-452, a dihydroquinolizinone (DHQ) analogue. AB-452 is a potent HBV RNA destabilizer by inhibiting PAPD5/7 proteins in vitro with good in vivo efficacy in a chronic HBV mouse model. AB-452 showed acceptable tolerability in 28-day rat and dog toxicity studies, and a high degree of oral exposure in multiple species. Based on its in vitro and in vivo profiles, AB-452 was identified as a clinical development candidate.

Mineralocorticoid receptor overactivation: targeting systemic impact with non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists.

The overactivation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) promotes pathophysiological processes related to multiple physiological systems, including the heart, vasculature, adipose tissue and kidneys. The inhibition of the MR with classical MR antagonists (MRA) has successfully improved outcomes most evidently in heart failure. However, real and perceived risk of side effects and limited tolerability associated with classical MRA have represented barriers to implementing MRA in settings where they have been already proven efficacious (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction) and studying their potential role in settings where they might be beneficial but where risk of safety events is perceived to be higher (renal disease). Novel non-steroidal MRA have distinct properties that might translate into favourable clinical effects and better safety profiles as compared with MRA currently used in clinical practice. Randomised trials have shown benefits of non-steroidal MRA in a range of clinical contexts, including diabetic kidney disease, hypertension and heart failure. This review provides an overview of the literature on the systemic impact of MR overactivation across organ systems. Moreover, we summarise the evidence from preclinical studies and clinical trials that have set the stage for a potential new paradigm of MR antagonism.

Design, Synthesis, Anticancer Evaluation, and Molecular Docking Studies of Oxazole-Incorporated Naphthyridine Derivatives.

A novel series of oxazole incorporated naphthyridine (21 a-j) derivatives were designed and, synthesized followed by screening of their anticancer activity profiles against human breast cancer (MCF-7), human lung cancer (A549) and human prostate (PC3 & DU-145) cancer cell lines by employing MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide] assay using etoposide as the positive control. Of these compounds, N-(6-chloro-3-(4-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)oxazol-2-yl)-1,5-naphthyridin-4-yl)oxazol-2-amine with 3,4,5-trimethoxy substituent on the aryl moiety attached to oxazole ring showed potent anticancer activity against PC3, A549, MCF-7, and DU-145 cell lines with IC50 values of 0.13±0.095 µM; 0.10±0.084 µM; 0.18±0.087 µM and 0.15±0.076 µM respectively. Apart from this, compounds N-(6-chloro-3-(4-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)oxazol-2-yl)-1,5-naphthyridin-4-yl)oxazol-2-amine, N-(6-chloro-3-(4-(4-methoxyphenyl)oxazol-2-yl)-1,5-naphthyridin-4-yl)oxazol-2-amine, and N-(6-chloro-3-(4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)oxazol-2-yl)-1,5-naphthyridin-4-yl)oxazol-2-amine also showed better anticancer activities against four cancer cell lines screened for. These activities were also validated through the molecular docking simulations, which further indicated demonstration of better interaction energy and profile by these compounds.

Pyronaridine: a review of its clinical pharmacology in the treatment of malaria.

Pyronaridine-artesunate was recently strongly recommended in the 2022 update of the WHO Guidelines for the Treatment of Malaria, becoming the newest artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for both uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria. Pyronaridine-artesunate, available as a tablet and paediatric granule formulations, is being adopted in regions where malaria treatment outcome is challenged by increasing chloroquine resistance. Pyronaridine is an old antimalarial agent that has been used for more than 50 years as a blood schizonticide, which exerts its antimalarial activity by interfering with the synthesis of the haemozoin pigment within the Plasmodium digestive vacuole. Pyronaridine exhibits a high blood-to-plasma distribution ratio due to its tendency to accumulate in blood cells. This feature is believed to play a crucial role in its pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and pharmacological activity. The PK characteristics of pyronaridine include rapid oral absorption, large volumes of distribution and low total body clearance, resulting in a long terminal apparent half-life. Moreover, differences in PK profiles have been observed between healthy volunteers and malaria-infected patients, indicating a potential disease-related impact on PK properties. Despite a long history, there is only limited knowledge of the clinical PK and pharmacodynamics of pyronaridine, particularly in special populations such as children and pregnant women. We here provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical pharmacology of pyronaridine in the treatment of malaria.

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 1,6-naphthyridine-2-one derivatives as novel FGFR4 inhibitors for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Aberrant FGFR4 signaling has been implicated in the development of several cancers, making FGFR4 a promising target for cancer therapy. Several FGFR4-selective inhibitors have been developed, yet none of them have been approved. Herein, we report a novel series of 1,6-naphthyridine-2-one derivatives as potent and selective inhibitors targeting FGFR4 kinase. Preliminary structure-activity relationship analysis was conducted. The screening cascades revealed that 19g was the preferred compound among the prepared series. 19g demonstrated excellent kinase selectivity and substantial cytotoxic effect against all tested colorectal cancer cell lines. 19g induced significant tumor inhibition in a HCT116 xenograft mouse model without any apparent toxicity. Notably, 19g exhibited excellent potency in disrupting the phosphorylation of FGFR4 and downstream signaling proteins mediated by FGF18 and FGF19. Compound 19g might be a potential antitumor drug candidate for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Pyrazole derivatives of pyridine and naphthyridine as proapoptotic agents in cervical and breast cancer cells.

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The increasing prevalence and resistance to chemotherapy is responsible for driving the search of novel molecules to combat this disease. In search of novel compounds with pro-apoptotic potential, pyrazolo-pyridine and pyrazolo-naphthyridine derivatives were investigated against cervical cancer (HeLa) and breast cancer (MCF-7) cells. The anti-proliferative activity was determined through the MTT assay. Potent compounds were then analyzed for their cytotoxic and apoptotic activity through a lactate dehydrogenase assay and fluorescence microscopy after propidium iodide and DAPI staining. Flow cytometry was used to determine cell cycle arrest in treated cells and pro-apoptotic effect was verified through measurement of mitochondrial membrane potential and activation of caspases. Compounds 5j and 5k were found to be most active against HeLa and MCF-7 cells, respectively. G0/G1 cell cycle arrest was observed in treated cancer cells. Morphological features of apoptosis were also confirmed, and an increased oxidative stress indicated the involvement of reactive oxygen species in apoptosis. The compound-DNA interaction studies demonstrated an intercalative mode of binding and the comet assay confirmed the DNA damaging effects. Finally, potent compounds demonstrated a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential and increased levels of activated caspase-9 and -3/7 confirmed the induction of apoptosis in treated HeLa and MCF-7 cells. The present work concludes that the active compounds 5j and 5k may be used as lead candidates for the development of lead drug molecules against cervical and breast cancer.

Finerenone in type 2 diabetes and renal outcomes: A random-effects model meta-analysis.

Background: The nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist finerenone is a new addition to the list of agents (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors) conferring renal protection to patients with diabetic kidney disease. Two recent meta-analyses using the fixed effect model in patients with chronic kidney disease (both diabetic and nondiabetic populations) came to a conflicting conclusion on the effect of finerenone on eGFR decline. This meta-analysis was undertaken exclusively in the type 2 diabetes (T2D) population to explore the robustness and heterogeneity of the effect size by conducting a random effects model meta-analysis along with draft plots and prediction intervals. Materials and methods: A database search was conducted using the Cochrane library, PubMed, and Embase to identify relevant citations. Analysis was conducted on the 14th of September 2022, using RevMan 5.4.1 and RStudio (2022.07.1, Build 554). The hazard ratio was used as the effect size for the renal composite, while the standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to estimate the effect size of eGFR decline and reduction in the urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR). The Cochrane risk-of-bias was used to assess the quality of the studies. The primary outcome assessed was the renal composite defined as kidney failure, a sustained decrease of at least 40% in the eGFR from baseline, or death from renal causes. Results: A pooled population of 13,943 patients from four citations was included for analysis. The Cochrane risk of bias was used to assess the quality of the studies. There was a significant 16% reduction in the renal composite (kidney failure, a sustained decrease of at least 40% in the eGFR from baseline, or death from renal causes) [HR: 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.92, 2: 0, I2: 0%). Finerenone was also associated with reduction in UACR (SMD: -0.49, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.46, τ2: < 0.0001, I2: 0%, prediction interval: -0.57 to -0.41) and prevention of decline in eGFR (SMD: -0.32, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.27, τ2: < 0.0001, I2: 0%, prediction interval: -0.43 to -0.21) without any evidence for significant heterogeneity. Except for an increase in hyperkalaemia (RR: 2.22, 95% CI 1.93-2.24), adverse events were observed with fineronone compared to placebo (RR: 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.01). Conclusion: There are significant benefits in renal outcomes associated with finerenone treatment in T2D patients with established chronic kidney disease with a side effect profile comparable to placebo.

FDA Approval Summary: Ripretinib for Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

On May 15, 2020, the FDA approved ripretinib for adult patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor who have received prior treatment with three or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. The approval was based on results from INVICTUS (NCT03353753), an international, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomly allocated (2:1) to receive either ripretinib 150 mg once daily (n = 85) or matching placebo (n = 44). The trial demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by modified RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review for patients randomized to ripretinib, with a median PFS of 6.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.6-6.9] compared with 1.0 month (95% CI: 0.9-1.7) for placebo [HR: 0.15 (95% CI: 0.09-0.25); P < 0.0001, stratified log-rank test]. There was no statistically significant difference in objective response rate in the ripretinib arm, 9% (95% CI: 4.2-18) compared with placebo 0% [(95% CI: 0-8); P = 0.0504, Fisher exact test]. The median overall survival (OS) in the ripretinib arm was 15.1 months (95% CI: 12.3-15.1) compared with 6.6 months (95% CI: 4.1-11.6) in the placebo arm. A formal statistical comparison of OS was not made due to the prespecified hierarchical analysis plan. The most common (≥20%) adverse events with ripretinib, in order of decreasing frequency, were alopecia, fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, constipation, myalgia, diarrhea, decreased appetite, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and vomiting. Other important risks of ripretinib include new primary cutaneous malignancies, hypertension, and cardiac dysfunction.