Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatrics ; 137 Suppl 4: S213-8, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27251867

ABSTRACT

The National Children's Study (NCS) was an ambitious attempt to map children's health and development in a large representative group of children in the United States. In this introduction, we briefly review the background of the NCS and the history of the multiple strategies that were tested to recruit women and children. Subsequent articles then detail the protocols and outcomes of 4 of the recruitment strategies. It is hoped that lessons learned from these attempts to define a study protocol that could achieve the initial aims of the NCS will inform future efforts to conceptualize and execute strategies to provide generalizable insights on the longitudinal health of our nation's children.


Subject(s)
Child Development , Child Welfare/trends , National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)/trends , Patient Selection , Child , Child Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)/legislation & jurisprudence , Pilot Projects , United States/epidemiology
2.
Pediatrics ; 137 Suppl 4: S239-47, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27251870

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In 2009, the National Children's Study (NCS) Vanguard Study tested the feasibility of household-based recruitment and participant enrollment using a birth-rate probability sample. In 2010, the NCS Program Office launched 3 additional recruitment approaches. We tested whether provider-based recruitment could improve recruitment outcomes compared with household-based recruitment. METHODS: The NCS aimed to recruit 18- to 49-year-old women who were pregnant or at risk for becoming pregnant who lived in designated geographic segments within primary sampling units, generally counties. Using provider-based recruitment, 10 study centers engaged providers to enroll eligible participants at their practice. Recruitment models used different levels of provider engagement (full, intermediate, information-only). RESULTS: The percentage of eligible women per county ranged from 1.5% to 57.3%. Across the centers, 3371 potential participants were approached for screening, 3459 (92%) were screened and 1479 were eligible (43%). Of those 1181 (80.0%) gave consent and 1008 (94%) were retained until delivery. Recruited participants were generally representative of the county population. CONCLUSIONS: Provider-based recruitment was successful in recruiting NCS participants. Challenges included time-intensity of engaging the clinical practices, differential willingness of providers to participate, and necessary reliance on providers for participant identification. The vast majority of practices cooperated to some degree. Recruitment from obstetric practices is an effective means of obtaining a representative sample.


Subject(s)
Child Development , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act , Health Personnel , National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.) , Patient Selection , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act/trends , Health Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Personnel/trends , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic/methods , National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)/legislation & jurisprudence , National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)/trends , Pregnancy , Sampling Studies , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...