Targeting safety: Exploring trends and risk factors in pediatric head and neck BB gun injuries and hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: To examine head and neck injuries caused by BB (Ball Bearing) guns treated in US emergency departments among children under 18 to identify trends in injury frequency over time and risk factors associated with severe injuries leading to hospital admission. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), a single database, to analyze head and neck injuries caused by BB guns between 1993 and 2019. The analysis explored demographic characteristics and injury patterns, including sex, age, incidence, injury location, hospital type, and disposition. Linear regression was employed to assess trends in the yearly frequency of injuries, while univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios associated with hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 4041 cases of pediatric head and neck injuries caused by BB guns and treated in US emergency departments were identified. Most patients were male (84 %), with the highest proportion of injuries occurring in the 10-14 age group (49.7 %). The face (35.8 %) and eye (27.4 %) were the most affected injury sites, and 7.5 % of patients required hospital admission. No significant linear trend was observed in injury frequency over the study period. However, children aged four and under had higher odds of hospitalization (OR 2.77, 95 % CI 1.61-4.75) despite a lower incidence of injuries. Injuries to the eye (OR 12.37, 95 % CI 8.31-18.43) and neck (OR 7.58, 95 % CI 4.76-12.06) were strong predictors of hospital admission. CONCLUSION: Pediatric BB gun-related head and neck injuries remain a source of emergency room visits nationally. Younger children are at increased risk of admission to the hospital. Eye and neck injuries were the strongest predictors of hospital admission. Implementing safety precautions for younger children is crucial, as injuries might be more severe in this age group.

Trends in prehospital cervical collar utilization in trauma patients: Closer, but not there yet.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the change in cervical spine (C-spine) immobilization frequency in trauma patients over time. We hypothesize that the frequency of unnecessary C-spine immobilization has decreased. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of adult trauma patients transported to our American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma center from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021, was performed. Emergency medical services documentation was manually reviewed to record prehospital physiology and the application of a prehospital cervical collar (c-collar). C-spine injuries were defined as cervical vertebral fractures and/or spinal cord injuries. Univariate and year-by-year trend analyses were used to assess changes in C-spine injury and immobilization frequency. RESULTS: Among 2906 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 12% sustained C-spine injuries, while 88% did not. Patients with C-spine injuries were more likely to experience blunt trauma (95% vs. 68%, p < 0.001), were older (46 years vs. 41 years, p < 0.001), and had higher Injury Severity Scores (31 vs. 18, p < 0.001). They also exhibited lower initial systolic blood pressures (108 mm Hg vs. 119 mm Hg, p < 0.001), lower heart rates (92 beats/min vs. 97 beats/min, p < 0.05), and lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores (9 vs. 11, p < 0.001). In blunt trauma, c-collars were applied to 83% of patients with C-spine injuries and 75% without; for penetrating trauma, c-collars were applied to 50% of patients with C-spine injuries and only 8% without. Among penetrating trauma patients with C-spine injury, all patients either arrived quadriplegic or did not require emergent neurosurgical intervention. The proportion of patients receiving a c-collar decreased in both blunt and penetrating traumas from 2014 to 2021 (blunt-82% in 2014 to 68% in 2021; penetrating-24% in 2014 to 6% in 2021). CONCLUSIONS: Unnecessary C-spine stabilization has decreased from 2014 to 2021. However, c-collars are still being applied to patients who do not need them, both in blunt and in penetrating trauma cases, while not being applied to patients who would benefit from them.

Prehospital Management of Penetrating Neck Injuries: An Evaluation of Practice.

OBJECTIVE: Penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) can occur at multiple anatomic sites and involve airway, nerve, vascular, and gastrointestinal structures. They pose a unique challenge to clinicians, especially in the prehospital setting. Published guidance on the prehospital management of PNIs is limited, and there is no review of the current prehospital practice. METHODS: A retrospective electronic case note review of PNIs managed within 1 UK helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) over a 7-year period was undertaken. Data were collected on the zone of injury, mechanism of injury, prehospital times, patient demographics, prehospital interventions, and on-scene mortality. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients met the study inclusion criteria, 40% of whom had zone 2 neck injuries. Eighty-three percent were male with a mean age of 42 years. The predominant injury mechanism was interpersonal violence (51%) followed by self-harm (47%). Fifteen percent underwent prehospital emergency anesthesia, 17% underwent prehospital blood transfusion, and 30% had a hemostatic dressing applied. No patients underwent cervical spine immobilization. One percent underwent resuscitative thoracotomy. Five percent were pronounced life extinct after HEMS arrival following interventions by the HEMS team. CONCLUSION: Time-critical and emergent interventions in this select patient population must be minimal and focus on optimizing care during rapid transfer to the hospital. Airway and hemorrhagic pathologies must be managed, often concomitantly. Targeted injury prevention to reduce interpersonal violence must ensue. The author group intends to devise a national Delphi and derive consensus guidelines for the management of prehospital PNIs.

Association of Prehospital Neck Wound Survivability and Battlefield Medical Evacuation Time in Afghanistan.

INTRODUCTION: The U.S. Military's Golden Hour policy led to improved warfighter survivability during the Global War on Terror. The policy's success is well-documented, but a categorical evaluation and stratification of medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) times based on combat injury is lacking. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Joint Trauma System Prehospital Trauma Registry for casualties with documented penetrating neck trauma in Afghanistan requiring battlefield MEDEVAC from June 15, 2009, through February 1, 2021. Casualties were excluded if the time from the point of injury to reach higher level medical care was not documented, listed as zero, or exceeded 4 hours. They were also excluded if demographic data were incomplete or deemed unreliable or if their injuries occurred outside of Afghanistan.We designed a logistic regression model to test for associations in survivability, adjusting for composite injury severity score, patient age group, and type of next higher level of care reached. We then used our model to interpolate MEDEVAC times associated with 0.1%, 1%, and 10% increased risk of death for an incapacitated casualty with penetrating neck trauma. RESULTS: Of 1,147 encounters, 444 casualties met inclusion criteria. Of these casualties, 430 (96.9%) survived to discharge. Interpolative analysis of our multivariable logistic regression model showed that MEDEVAC times ≥8 minutes, ≥53 minutes, and ≥196 minutes are associated with a 0.1%, 1%, and 10% increased risk of mortality from baseline, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data characterize the maximum MEDEVAC times associated with 0.1%, 1%, and 10% increased risk of death from baseline survivability for penetrating battlefield neck trauma in Afghanistan.

A Ten-Year Retrospective Cohort Study on Neck Collar Immobilization in Trauma Patients with Head and Neck Injuries.

Background and Objectives: In the context of prehospital care, spinal immobilization is commonly employed to maintain cervical stability in head and neck injury patients. However, its use in cases of unclear consciousness or major trauma patients is often precautionary, pending the exclusion of unstable spinal injuries through appropriate diagnostic imaging. The impact of prehospital C-spinal immobilization in these specific patient populations remains uncertain. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital from January 2009 to May 2019, focusing on trauma patients suspected of head and neck injuries. The primary outcome assessed was in-hospital mortality. We employed multivariable logistic regression to investigate the relationship between prehospital C-spine immobilization and outcomes, while adjusting for various factors such as age, gender, type of traumatic brain injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and activation of trauma team. Results: Our analysis encompassed 2733 patients. Among these, patients in the unclear consciousness group (GCS ≤ 8) who underwent C-spine immobilization exhibited a higher mortality rate than those without immobilization. However, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality among patients with alert consciousness (GCS > 8). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced age (age ≥ 65), unclear consciousness (GCS ≤ 8), major traumatic injuries (ISS ≥ 16 and RTS ≤ 7), and the use of neck collars for immobilization (adjusted OR: 1.850, 95% CI: 1.240-2.760, p = 0.003) were significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality. Subgroup analysis indicated that C-spine immobilization was significantly linked to an elevated risk of mortality in older adults (age ≥ 65), patients with unclear consciousness (GCS ≤ 8), those with major traumatic injuries (ISS ≥ 16 and RTS ≤ 7), and individuals in shock (shock index > 1). Conclusions: While our findings do not advocate for the complete abandonment of neck collars in all suspected head and neck injury patients, our study suggests that prehospital cervical and spinal immobilization should be applied more selectively in certain head and neck injury populations. This approach is particularly relevant for older individuals (age ≥ 65), those with unclear consciousness (GCS ≤ 8), individuals experiencing major traumatic injuries (ISS ≥ 16 or RTS ≤ 7), and patients in a state of shock (shock index ≥ 1). Our study employs a retrospective cohort design, which may introduce selection bias. Therefore, in the future, there is a need for confirmation of our results through a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) arises, as this design is considered ideal for addressing this issue.

SOFTLY: Comparison of outcomes of rigid versus soft collar during emergency department investigation for potential cervical spine injury in low-risk blunt trauma patients - A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Blunt trauma patients with potential cervical spine injury are traditionally immobilised in rigid collars. Recently, this has been challenged. The present study's objective was comparison of the rate of patient-oriented adverse events in stable, alert, low-risk patients with potential cervical spine injuries immobilised in rigid versus soft collars. METHODS: Unblinded, prospective quasi-randomised clinical trial of neurologically intact, adult, blunt trauma patients assessed as having potential cervical spine injury. Patients were randomised to collar type. All other aspects of care were unchanged. Primary outcome was patient-reported discomfort related to neck immobilisation by collar type. Secondary outcomes included adverse neurological events, agitation and clinically important cervical spine injuries (clinical trial registration number: ACTRN12621000286842). RESULTS: A total of 137 patients were enrolled: 59 patients allocated to a rigid collar and 78 to a soft collar. Most injuries were from a fall <1 m (54%) or a motor vehicle crash (21.9%). Median neck pain score of collar immobilisation was lower in the soft collar group (3.0 [interquartile range 0-6.1] vs 6.0 [interquartile range 3-8.8], P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with clinician-identified agitation was lower in the soft collar group (5% vs 17%, P = 0.04). There were four clinically important cervical spine injuries (two in each group). All were treated conservatively. There were no adverse neurological events. CONCLUSIONS: Use of soft rather than rigid collar immobilisation for low-risk blunt trauma patients with potential cervical spine injury is significantly less painful for patients and results in less agitation. A larger study is needed to determine the safety of this approach or whether collars are required at all.

Review article: Non-penetrating neck artery dissection in young adults: Not to be missed!

Young adults who present to the ED with neck pain following non-penetrating, seemingly trivial trauma to the neck, are at risk of neck artery dissection and subsequent stroke. Sport-related neck injury is the chief cause. Physical examination may often be unremarkable, and although there may be reluctance to expose young patients to radiation, radiological imaging is central to making a diagnosis of arterial wall disruption. A comprehensive literature search was performed in relation to neck artery dissection, and the evidence was scrutinised. We discuss the typical mechanism of injury, symptoms, anatomical considerations and clinical aids in diagnosis of neck artery dissection. Although the incidence is low, neck artery dissection has a mortality of 7%. As such, it is important for front-line physicians to have a high suspicion of the diagnosis and a low threshold to organise radiological examinations, specifically computerised tomography. Early detection of neck artery dissection will trigger clinical protocols that call for multi-disciplinary team management of this condition. In general, guideline-based recommendation for the management of neck artery dissection involving an intimal flap is by anti-platelet therapy while treatment of neck artery dissection that results in a pseudo-aneurysm or thrombosis is managed by surgical intervention or endovascular techniques. Close follow up combined with antithrombotic treatment is recommended in these individuals, the goal being prevention of stroke.

Protect That Neck! Management of Blunt and Penetrating Neck Trauma.

Blunt and penetrating vascular injuries to the neck represent a significant burden of mortality and disability among trauma patients. Blunt cerebrovascular injury can present with signs of stroke either immediately or in a delayed fashion. Most injuries are detected with computed tomography angiogram and managed by antiplatelet agents or unfractionated heparin. In contrast, for patients presenting with penetrating neck injuries, assessment for hard signs of vascular and aerodigestive injury should be done and prompt emergent surgical consultation if present. Overall management priorities for penetrating neck injuries focus on airway management, hemorrhage control, and damage control resuscitation before definitive surgical repair.

[Acute care of soft tissue injuries in the head and neck region]. / Akutversorgung von Weichteilverletzungen im Kopf-Hals-Bereich.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue injuries are a common consequence of head and neck trauma. With injuries being highly individual and varying depending on the underlying trauma, it is difficult to establish standardized guidelines for head and neck trauma in general. The main goal of this study was to showcase the distribution of soft tissue injury types and the principles pertaining to acute care of the individual clinical presentations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was carried out using all trauma-relevant ICD-10 codes for trauma to the head (S00.- to S09.-) and neck (S10.- to S19.-) among patients who were treated at the authors' clinic-a certified national trauma center-during a period of 10 years (2012 to and including 2021). RESULTS: A total of 8375 patients with head and neck trauma were treated during the observation period, i.e., an average of 836 patients per year. Within this collective, 2981 trauma cases involving soft tissue injuries were documented. Superficial injuries to the head (S00.-) and open wounds to the head (S01.-) were the most common head and neck soft tissue injuries, with 1649 and 920 cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: The case numbers of soft tissue injuries generally show an inverse correlation to the required underlying trauma: diagnoses of the categories S00 and S01 occur very often; injuries which only occur after severe trauma, such as traumatic amputation at neck level (S18), are rare. According to current literature, penetrating neck traumas should be treated using a no-zone approach. In Europe, penetrating neck injuries are rather rare because of low crime rates and strict weapon laws.

The Fate of the Cervical Collar: An Observational Pilot Study Investigating Follow-up Care After Emergency Department Discharge in Children With Mild Traumatic Neck Injuries.

OBJECTIVES: After evaluation and treatment of minor traumatic cervical spine injury (CSI), many children are discharged home in a rigid cervical orthosis (RCO). This study investigated their adherence to RCO treatment recommendations. The feasibility of telehealth cervical spine clearance was also explored. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of children 3 to 18 years old with mild CSI evaluated at a level I pediatric trauma center from December 1, 2019, through July 31, 2021. Before emergency department discharge, patients received RCO use instructions and recommendation for follow-up with in-person neurosurgery clinic visit, neurosurgery telehealth visit, or in-person primary care provider visit. The family was responsible for arranging follow-up. Primary outcomes included compliance with follow-up and collar use. RESULTS: Ninety-eight children (mean age, 11.3 ± 4.1 years) were included. Overall, follow-up contact was available for 51 patients (52%). At 1-week follow-up with 36 children, 64% were collar compliant, 13 had no pain (38% remained in RCO), 14 had mild pain without limitations, 8 had pain with some limitations, and 1 had significant pain. At 2-week follow-up with 31 children, 9 (29%) were collar compliant, 23 had no pain, 7 had mild pain without limitations, and 1 with significant persistent pain was found to have an odontoid fracture requiring C1-2 fusion. Patients/families often discontinued the use of the collar without follow-up (47%). Approximately half utilized a recommended clinical follow-up option for clearance, most often in neurosurgery clinic or using a neurosurgery telehealth visit. The mean time to follow-up was 11.34 ± 4.9 days (range, 3-25 days), and mean collar compliance lasted 9.8 ± 5.7 days (range, 1-25 days). No child experienced any short-term complications related to RCO use. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, a substantial portion of children with mild CSIs discharged from the emergency department with an RCO did not adhere to compliance or follow-up recommendations. Persistent pain requires further evaluation.

Management of Head and Neck Injuries by the Sideline Physician.

Although rare, sport-related injuries to the head and neck can be life threatening; therefore, timely and appropriate treatment is critical. Preparation is key for the sideline physician and begins well before arriving on the sideline. Knowing the athletic trainer and support staff, establishing a chain of command and emergency action plan, and having all the appropriate equipment readily available are important for game or practice preparedness. At the athletic event, physicians should have a clear line of sight to the field of play and easy access to reach the field when necessary. When performing an on-field assessment of any athlete who is not moving, whether conscious, unconscious, or with decreased consciousness, head and neck injury must be assumed, and the injured athlete should be placed on a spine board with cervical spine stabilization and transported to the emergency department for further evaluation. Generally, helmets and pads are left on while the injured athlete is being transported. Concussion is among the most common head and neck injuries in athletes, and if concussion is suspected, the athlete cannot return to the game on the same day. Nasal fractures do not always require immediate closed reduction; however, orbital, maxillary, or mandibular fractures require transport to the emergency department. For tooth avulsion, time is important; reimplantation should be attempted within 30 minutes of injury.

[Update on neck trauma]. / Update Halstraumata.

BACKGROUND: Important organs and structures are located in the cervical region. In case of blunt and penetrating trauma, emergency situations may arise. OBJECTIVE: Emergency management as well as diagnostic and therapeutic steps pertaining to neck injuries are presented. CONCLUSION: Shock therapy and airway management are essential, fast management of neck injuries highly relevant.

Foley Catheter Balloon Tamponade for Actively Bleeding Wounds Following Penetrating Neck Injury is an Effective Technique for Controlling Non-Compressible Junctional External Haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: The foley catheter balloon tamponade (FCBT) has been widely employed in the management of trauma. This study reviews our cumulative experience with the use of FCBT in the management of patients presenting with a penetrating neck injury (PNI). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at a major trauma centre in South Africa over a 9-year period from January 2012 to December 2020. All patients who presented with a PNI who had FCBT were included. RESULTS: A total of 1581 patients with a PNI were managed by our trauma centre, and 44 (3%) patients had an FCBT. Of the 44 cases of FCBT, stab wounds accounted for 93% (41/44) and the remaining 7% were for gunshot wounds. Seventy-five per cent of all FCBT (33/44) were inserted at a rural hospital prior to transfer to our trauma centre; the remaining 25% (11/44) were inserted in our resuscitation room. The success rate of FCBT was 80% (35/44), allowing further CT with angiography (CTA) to be performed. CTA findings were: 10/35 (29%) positive, 18/35 (51%) negative, and 7/35 (20%) equivocal. Fifteen patients required additional intervention (open surgery or endovascular intervention). The overall morbidity was 14% (6/44). Eighteen per cent required intensive care unit admission. The median length of stay was 1 day. The overall mortality rate was 11% (5/44). CONCLUSION: FCBT is a simple and effective technique as an adjunct in the management of major haemorrhage from a PNI. In highly selective patients, it may also be used as definitive management.

Post-operative Use of Cervical Orthoses for Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries - a Survey-based Analysis at German Spine Care Centres. / Postoperative Anwendung von Zervikalorthesen bei Verletzungen der subaxialen Halswirbelsäule ­ eine umfragebasierte Analyse an deutschen Wirbelsäulenzentren.

INTRODUCTION: There are no evidence-based recommendations for the post-operative treatment and application of soft or rigid cervical collars after operative treatment of injuries of the subaxial cervical spine. Cervical collars can restrict peak range of motion and serve as a reminder to the patient. However, they can also cause pressure ulcers. The aim of this online-based survey among German spine centres was to gain an overview of post-operative treatment and the application of soft or rigid cervical collars after surgical treatment of injuries of the subaxial cervical spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online-based survey was conducted among 59 spine centres certified by the German Spine Society. It comprised seven items and the option of adding remarks in the form of open-ended responses. RESULTS: The return rate was 63% (37 out of 59). Of the 37 analysed spine centres, 51% routinely apply a cervical collar post-operatively, 27% apply a soft and 16% a rigid cervical collar, 8% sequentially apply first a rigid and later a soft cervical collar. Less than half of the spine centres (43%) routinely use no cervical collar. Rigid collars are applied for more than 6 weeks and soft collars up to 6 weeks at some spine centres. Standardised post-operative treatment plans are common. The selection of the post-operative treatment plan depends primarily on the type of injury and method of operation and partly on patient age and bone quality. The satisfaction of German spine centres with the current handling of post-operative treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries is high. DISCUSSION: The post-operative treatment of injuries of the subaxial cervical spine at German spine centres is heterogeneous, and the evidence on advantages and disadvantages of the post-operative application of cervical collars is insufficient. Planning and implementation of randomised controlled clinical trials in subaxial cervical spine injuries is challenging.

Pre-hospital management of penetrating neck injuries: a scoping review of current evidence and guidance.

Penetrating injuries to the neck pose a unique challenge to clinicians due to the proximity of multiple significant anatomical structures with little protective soft tissue coverage. Injuries to this area, whilst low in incidence, are potentially devastating. Respiratory, vascular, gastro-oesophageal and neurological structures may all be involved, either in isolation or combination. These injuries are particularly difficult to manage in the resource poor, often austere and/or remote, pre-hospital environment. A systematic scoping review of the literature was conducted to evaluate the current available research pertaining to managing this injury profile, prior to the patient arriving in the emergency department. The available research is discussed in sections based on the commonly used trauma management acronym 'cABCD' (catastrophic haemorrhage, Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability) to facilitate a systematic approach and clinical evaluation familiar to clinicians. Based on the available reviewed evidence, we have proposed a management algorithm for this cohort of patients. From this we plan to instigate a Delphi process to develop a consensus statement on the pre-hospital management of this challenging presentation.

Manejo quirúrgico de heridas por mordeduras de perro en pacientes pediátricos: nuestra experiencia en 8 años / Surgical management of dog bite wounds in pediatric patients: our experience in 8 years

Introducción. Hasta un 90% de las mordeduras de animales son producidas por perros. Los niños son la población más vulnerable frente a las mordeduras ya que suelen afectar una mayor proporción de superficie corporal. Objetivo. Analizar la casuística de mordeduras de perro y su repercusión en nuestro entorno. Métodos. Estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo de un período de 8 años, que incluyó a todos los pacientes de 0 a 18 años con diagnóstico de mordedura de perro. Resultados. Se incluyeron 183 pacientes con diagnóstico de mordedura de perro. El promedio de edad fue de 6,1 años, y el grupo etario más afectado fue el de los niños de 3 a 5 años (38,3%). El tratamiento quirúrgico fue dividido en pacientes que requirieron rafia por planos (84,6%), colgajos (11,4%), injertos (3,4%) y puntos de aproximación (1%). Se reportaron 8 pacientes con complicaciones (4,4%). Conclusión. Los niños de 3 a 5 años son los más afectados por mordeduras de perro y la zona de cabeza y cuello es la más común. Un porcentaje importante de pacientes requirieron colgajos e injertos con buenos resultados.

Introduction. Up to 90% of animal bites are produced by dogs. Children are the most vulnerable population because bites tend to affect greater body surface area. Outcome. Analyze dog bites cases and their impact on our environment. Methods. An observational, descriptive, retrospective study during an 8 year period was carried out, which included all patients from 0 to 18 years with a diagnosis of dog bite. Results. A total of 183 patients with a diagnosis of dog bite were found. The average age was 6.1 years, and the age group most affected was children from 3 to 5 years old (38.3%). Surgical treatment was divided into: patients who required suture by planes (84.6%), flaps (11.4%) and grafts (3.4%) and approximation stitches (1%). Complications were reported in 8 patients (4.4%). Conclusion. Children from 3 to 5 years old are the most affected by dog bites, the head and neck area is the most common. A significant percentage of patients required flaps and grafts with good results.

Neck trauma: diagnosis and management in the emergency department.

Neck trauma is an uncommon but serious presenting complaint in the emergency department. Many vital structures may be affected in a patient with a traumatic neck injury, including the airway, digestive tract, and carotid and vertebral arteries. Emergency clinicians must also be prepared to diagnose and manage occult and delayed presentations of injury related to neck trauma. This supplement reviews advances and best practices in the evaluation and management of patients with neck trauma, with a focus on evidence-based guidelines. A streamlined algorithm is provided as well as discussion of recent changes and controversies in neck trauma management in the prehospital and emergency department settings.

Head and neck injuries after leopard attack: Presentation and management.

Leopard attacks on humans are reported most often from the Indian subcontinent. The bite wounds are complex injuries infected with polymicrobial inoculum and may present as punctures, abrasions, lacerations or avulsions. The presentation and acceptable treatment of these injuries vary according to the wound. We hereby describe the clinical presentation and treatment of a male victim with leopard bite injuries on the head and neck region. As bite injuries are commonly found on and around the face, maxillofacial surgeons should be familiar with the therapy. Through thorough clinical and radiological examination, it is essential to prevent missing any hidden injuries, which can easily turn lethal. To benefit the rural population, more health facilities need to be established in remote areas.

Pediatric penetrating cervical trauma in HCUP: Associations with hospital length of stay and cost.

OBJECTIVE: To describe pediatric penetrating cervical trauma (PCT) and determine factors associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and total hospital charges. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) from the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) for 2016. SETTING: Public database. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the HCUP from the KID for 2016 for inpatients ≤18 years of age. Comparisons between PCT and non-PCT patients were made, including hospital LOS and total charges. RESULTS: There were 1279 patients with neck trauma of which 686 (53.6%) were identified as sustaining PCT. Patients with PCT were older (13.2 vs 11.8 yr, p = .001), and were more likely to be male (65.9% vs 54.8%, p < .001) and African-American (21.9% vs 15.9, p = .01). PCT patients were less likely to have a vascular injury (6.1% vs 20.1%, p < .001) and they were more likely to undergo airway evaluation (8.3% vs 2.2%, p < .001). Within the PCT group, 11.5% had open pharyngeal/esophageal lacerations, 6.1% had open tracheal injuries, 2.0% had open thyroid injuries, and 1.6% had open laryngeal injuries. LOS and total charges were not different between children with and without PCT (mean LOS 6.5 days, mean total charges US$106,000). Linear regression analysis showed significant associations with LOS for age, tracheal open injuries, cervical or vascular injury, and undergoing airway evaluation and/or esophagoscopy. Total charges associations were similar. CONCLUSION: LOS and total charges were not different in children with PCT and non-PCT, but both were increased when there were more cervical injuries and more related procedures done.