Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 46
Filter
1.
J Pediatr ; 233: 82-89.e1, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33545189

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe longitudinal health care utilization of Medicaid-insured children with a history of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) compared with similar children without NAS. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal cohort study. Data were extracted from the Medicaid Analytic eXtract files for all available states and DC from 2003-2013. Subjects were followed up to 11 years. In total, 17 229 children with NAS were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 779.5. Children without NAS, matched on demographic and health variables, served as the comparison group. Outcomes were number of claims for inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department encounters, numbers of prescription claims, and costs associated with these services. Linked claims were identified for each subject using a unique, within-state ID. RESULTS: Children with NAS had increased claims for inpatient admissions (marginal effect [ME] 0.49; SE 0.01) and emergency department visits (ME 0.30; SE 0.04) through year 1; increased prescriptions (ME 1.45; SE 0.08, age 0) (ME 0.69; SE 0.11, age 1 year) through year 2; and increased outpatient encounters (ME 20.13; SE 0.54, age 0) (ME 3.95; SE 0.62, age 1 year) (ME 2.90; SE 1.11, age 2 years) through year 3 after adjusting for potential confounders (P < .01 for all). Beyond the third year, health care utilization was similar between those with and without NAS. CONCLUSIONS: Children with a diagnosis of NAS have greater health care utilization through the third year of life. These differences resolve by the fourth year. Our results suggest resolution of disparities may be due to shifts in developmental health management in school-age children and inability to track relevant diagnoses in a health care database.


Subject(s)
Medicaid/economics , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Drug Prescriptions/economics , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Patient Admission/economics , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
2.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 106(5): 494-500, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33627328

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) across neonatal units, explore healthcare utilisation and estimate the direct cost to the NHS. DESIGN: Population cohort study. SETTING: NHS neonatal units, using data held in the National Neonatal Research Database. PARTICIPANTS: Infants born between 2012 and 2017, admitted to a neonatal unit in England, receiving a diagnosis of NAS (n=6411). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, direct annual cost of care (£, 2016-2017 prices), duration of neonatal unit stay (discharge HR), predicted additional cost of care, and odds of receiving pharmacotherapy. RESULTS: Of 524 334 infants admitted during the study period, 6411 had NAS. The incidence (1.6/1000 live births) increased between 2012 and 2017 (ß=0.07, 95% CI (0 to 0.14)) accounting for 12/1000 admissions and 23/1000 cot days nationally. The direct cost of care was £62 646 661 over the study period. Almost half of infants received pharmacotherapy (n=2631; 49%) and their time-to-discharge was significantly longer (median 18.2 vs 5.1 days; adjusted HR (aHR) 0.16, 95% CI (0.15 to 0.17)). Time-to-discharge was longer for formula-fed infants (aHR 0.73 (0.66 to 0.81)) and those discharged to foster care (aHR 0.77 (0.72 to 0.82)). The greatest predictor of additional care costs was receipt of pharmacotherapy (additional mean adjusted cost of £8420 per infant). CONCLUSIONS: This population study highlights the substantial cot usage and economic costs of caring for infants with NAS on neonatal units. A shift in how healthcare systems provide routine care for NAS could benefit infants and families while alleviating the burden on services.


Subject(s)
Hospital Costs , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , State Medicine/economics , Databases, Factual , Direct Service Costs , England/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay/economics , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/drug therapy , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Nurseries, Hospital/economics , Retrospective Studies
3.
JAMA ; 325(2): 146-155, 2021 01 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33433576

ABSTRACT

Importance: Substantial increases in both neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and maternal opioid use disorder have been observed through 2014. Objective: To examine national and state variation in NAS and maternal opioid-related diagnoses (MOD) rates in 2017 and to describe national and state changes since 2010 in the US, which included expanded MOD codes (opioid use disorder plus long-term and unspecified use) implemented in International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification. Design, Setting, and Participants: Repeated cross-sectional analysis of the 2010 to 2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample and State Inpatient Databases, an all-payer compendium of hospital discharge records from community nonrehabilitation hospitals in 47 states and the District of Columbia. Exposures: State and year. Main Outcomes and Measures: NAS rate per 1000 birth hospitalizations and MOD rate per 1000 delivery hospitalizations. Results: In 2017, there were 751 037 birth hospitalizations and 748 239 delivery hospitalizations in the national sample; 5375 newborns had NAS and 6065 women had MOD documented in the discharge record. Mean gestational age was 38.4 weeks and mean maternal age was 28.8 years. From 2010 to 2017, the estimated NAS rate significantly increased by 3.3 per 1000 birth hospitalizations (95% CI, 2.5-4.1), from 4.0 (95% CI, 3.3-4.7) to 7.3 (95% CI, 6.8-7.7). The estimated MOD rate significantly increased by 4.6 per 1000 delivery hospitalizations (95% CI, 3.9-5.4), from 3.5 (95% CI, 3.0-4.1) to 8.2 (95% CI, 7.7-8.7). Larger increases for MOD vs NAS rates occurred with new International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes in 2016. From a census of 47 state databases in 2017, NAS rates ranged from 1.3 per 1000 birth hospitalizations in Nebraska to 53.5 per 1000 birth hospitalizations in West Virginia, with Maine (31.4), Vermont (29.4), Delaware (24.2), and Kentucky (23.9) also exceeding 20 per 1000 birth hospitalizations, while MOD rates ranged from 1.7 per 1000 delivery hospitalizations in Nebraska to 47.3 per 1000 delivery hospitalizations in Vermont, with West Virginia (40.1), Maine (37.8), Delaware (24.3), and Kentucky (23.4) also exceeding 20 per 1000 delivery hospitalizations. From 2010 to 2017, NAS and MOD rates increased significantly for all states except Nebraska and Vermont, which only had MOD increases. Conclusions and Relevance: In the US from 2010 to 2017, estimated rates of NAS and MOD significantly increased nationally and for the majority of states, with notable state-level variation.


Subject(s)
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Opioid-Related Disorders/ethnology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/ethnology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
South Med J ; 113(8): 392-398, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32747968

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate hospital resource usage patterns and determine risk factors for neonatal withdrawal syndrome (NWS) in the United States. METHODS: Using the 2016 Kids' Inpatient Database (KID), we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative sample of neonates with NWS. The KID is the largest publicly available pediatric (20 years of age and younger) inpatient care database in the United States. We analyzed a stratified probability sampling of 3.1 million pediatric hospital discharges weighted to 6.3 million national discharges. Descriptive statistics for hospital and patient characteristics were identified and binary variables were analyzed using the Student t test. Multivariate regression was performed to assess the predictors of NWS. We excluded discharges if total cost or hospital length of stay (LOS) exceeded mean values by >3 standard deviations. Hospitalizations with NWS diagnosis were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification code P96.1 in any 1 of 30 discharge diagnostic fields. RESULTS: We estimated that 25,394 pediatric discharges were associated with an NWS diagnosis, totaling 403,127 inpatient days at a cost of $1.8 billion. Compared with non-NWS newborns, neonates with NWS had higher mean hospital charges ($71,540 vs $15,765), longer mean hospital stays (16 days vs 3 days), and a significantly higher proportion of low birth weight (7.2% vs 1.9%), feeding problems (19.0% vs 3.5%), respiratory diagnoses (5.6% vs 2.5%), and seizure (0.3% vs 0.1%). Among newborns with NWS, 53% were boys, 80.0% were white, 7.2% were black, 7.4% were Hispanic, and 5.3% were of other races. Hispanic neonates had the highest mean hospital charges and LOS of any other ethnic group ($123,749, 21 days). The largest proportion (83.0%) of NWS-related hospital stays were billed to Medicaid, followed by private insurance (10.3%) and self-pay (4.8%). More than one-third of NWS-related discharges (39.3%) occurred in areas with the lowest mean household annual income (≤$42,999) compared with 28.4% of neonates without NWS. Most NWS cases (53%) had ≥5 diagnoses, compared with 11% of non-NWS neonates. In the multivariate analysis, neonates with a birth weight <2500 g, feeding problems, respiratory diagnoses, seizure, >4 diagnoses, LOS >5 days, rural hospitals, Medicaid, and low-income households were significantly associated with NWS. There was a statistically significant mean hospital charge difference of $55,775 between NWS and non-NWS neonates. CONCLUSIONS: Since 2000, the number of infants treated for NWS in the US neonatal intensive care units has increased fivefold, accounting for an estimated $1.5 billion in annual hospital expenditures. The high hospital resource usage among NWS neonates raises the possibility that care for expectant mothers who use opiates and their newborns may be able to be delivered in a more efficient and effective manner. Because the majority of the study population was covered by Medicaid programs, state policy makers should be mindful of the impact the opioid crises continue to have on expectant mothers and their infants.


Subject(s)
Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Birth Weight , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/etiology , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology
5.
Am J Perinatol ; 37(1): 1-7, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31370065

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our cost-effectiveness analysis investigated rooming-in versus not rooming-in to determine optimal management of neonates with neonatal opioid withdrawal (NOW). STUDY DESIGN: A decision-analytic model was constructed using TreeAge to compare rooming-in versus not rooming-in in a theoretical cohort of 23,200 newborns, the estimated annual number affected by NOW in the United States. Additional considerations included the effect of breast milk versus formula milk in evaluating the need for pharmacotherapy. Primary outcomes were needed for pharmacotherapy and neurodevelopment. We assumed a societal perspective in evaluating costs and maternal-neonatal quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. Model inputs were derived from literature and varied in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Rooming-in resulted in fewer neonates requiring pharmacotherapy when compared with not rooming-in. The rooming-in group had more neonates with intact/mild neurodevelopmental impairment and fewer cases of moderate to severe impairment. Rooming-in resulted in cost savings of $509,652,728 and 12,333 additional QALYs per annual cohort. When the risk ratio of need for pharmacotherapy in rooming-in was varied across a clinically plausible range, rooming-in remained the cost-effective strategy. CONCLUSION: Maternal rooming-in with newborns affected by NOW leads to reduced costs and increased effectiveness. Management strategies should optimize nonpharmacological interventions as first-line treatment.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Nurseries, Hospital/economics , Rooming-in Care/economics , Cohort Studies , Cost Savings , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Models, Economic , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , United States/epidemiology
7.
Am J Manag Care ; 25(13 Suppl): S264-S269, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31361429

ABSTRACT

Children whose mothers used or misused opioids during their pregnancies are at an increased risk of exhibiting cognitive or behavioral impairments in the future, which may result in identifiable disabilities that require special education services in school. The costs associated with these additional educational services, however, have remained unknown. Using data from available empirical work, we calculated a preliminary set of cost estimates of special education and related services for children diagnosed with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). We estimated these costs for a single cohort of children from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with a diagnosis of NAS. The resulting cost estimates were $16,506,916 (2017 US$) in total educational services provisions, with $8,253,458 (2017 US$) of these costs attributable to the additional provision of special education services. This estimate includes both opioid use during pregnancy that was linked to NAS in general and NAS that resulted specifically from prescription opioid use. We estimate the total annual education costs for children born in Pennsylvania with NAS associated with maternal use of prescription opioids to be $1,012,506 (2017 US$). Of these costs, we estimate that $506,253 (2017 US$) are attributable to the additional provision of special education services. We detail the calculation of these cost estimates and provide an expanded set of estimates for additional years of special education services (3-year, 5-year, and 13-year, or the K-12 educational time frame). We conclude with a discussion of limitations and suggestions for future work.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Education, Special/economics , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Opioid Epidemic/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Child Behavior Disorders/chemically induced , Child Behavior Disorders/economics , Child, Preschool , Education, Special/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Learning Disabilities/chemically induced , Learning Disabilities/economics , Medicaid , Opioid-Related Disorders/economics , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
9.
J Addict Nurs ; 30(1): 61-66, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30830002

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The epidemic use of opioids is negatively influencing the health of the American people. Pregnant women and their unborn babies have not escaped the ravages of substance use. A dramatic increase in maternal opioid use has led to an increasing number of infants experiencing withdrawal symptoms known as neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). The purpose of this article is to highlight best practice for the management of infants with opioid withdrawal. REVIEW OF PROTOCOLS AND TREATMENTS: Review of available protocols and treatments revealed wide variation in the treatment of NAS and little use of standardized guidelines or protocols, despite current recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics. There is supporting evidence showing that the use of standardized protocols reduces the length of treatment and enhances outcomes in the neonatal population. EVIDENCE-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS: Evidence-based strategies to address gaps in practice include developing strong protocols to identify infants at risk and implementing standardized plans when treating NAS. Consistent assessment, initial treatment with nonpharmacologic measures, and conservative use of pharmacologic agents are important elements to an NAS treatment protocol. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: In evaluating the current literature for best practice in the management of the newborn with opioid withdrawal, it is clear that evidence-based standardized protocols need to be in place for the best treatment of the mother-infant dyad, caring for both the infants with NAS as well as the mothers with opioid use disorder.


Subject(s)
Clinical Protocols , Evidence-Based Practice/methods , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/drug therapy , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Breast Feeding , Female , Hospital Costs , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Pregnancy
10.
J Pediatr ; 204: 111-117.e1, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30270164

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe healthcare use over time of children with a history of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) compared with children without NAS. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective, longitudinal cohort study, data were obtained from MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database from 2005 to 2014. Children with and without NAS based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnostic codes were followed until 8 years or disenrollment (mean: 35 months). Numbers of claims for inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department encounters; prescription drugs; and costs associated with these encounters were evaluated. RESULTS: Children with NAS had a significantly greater number of claims per year from age 1 to 8 for inpatient hospitalizations (adjusted mean ratio 3.20; 95% CI 1.74-5.90), outpatient encounters (1.23; 1.08-1.41), and emergency department visits (1.46; 1.25-1.70) after we adjusted for confounders. Subsequently, adjusted mean annualized costs were nearly double for all healthcare services in children with NAS (1.86; 1.34-2.60) and >4 times as high as for inpatient hospitalizations (4.34; 2.03-9.30) compared with children without NAS. CONCLUSIONS: Children with a diagnosis of NAS have significantly greater rates of healthcare use through age 8 years compared with children without NAS. These findings suggest that children affected by NAS have medical disparities that linger well beyond early infancy.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , United States
12.
Pediatrics ; 141(4)2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29572288

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe incidence, health care use, and cost trends for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) who are covered by Medicaid compared with other infants. METHODS: We used 2004-2014 hospital birth data from the National Inpatient Sample, a nationally representative sample of hospital discharges in the United States (N = 13 102 793). Characteristics and trends among births impacted by NAS were examined by using univariate statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: Medicaid covered 73.7% of NAS-related births in 2004 (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.9%-77.9%) and 82.0% of NAS-related births in 2014 (95% CI, 80.5%-83.5%). Among infants covered by Medicaid, NAS incidence increased more than fivefold during our study period, from 2.8 per 1000 births (95% CI, 2.1-3.6) in 2004 to 14.4 per 1000 births (95% CI, 12.9-15.8) in 2014. Infants with NAS who were covered by Medicaid were significantly more likely to be transferred to another hospital and have a longer length of stay than infants without NAS who were enrolled in Medicaid or infants with NAS who were covered by private insurance. Adjusting for inflation, total hospital costs for NAS births that were covered by Medicaid increased from $65.4 million in 2004 to $462 million in 2014. The proportion of neonatal hospital costs due to NAS increased from 1.6% in 2004 to 6.7% in 2014 among births that were covered by Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: The number of Medicaid-financed births that are impacted by NAS has risen substantially and totaled $462 million in hospital costs in 2014. Improving affordable health insurance coverage for low-income women before pregnancy would expand access to substance use disorder treatment and could reduce NAS-related morbidity and costs.


Subject(s)
Hospital Costs/trends , Medicaid/economics , Medicaid/trends , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Male , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/therapy , United States/epidemiology
13.
Acad Pediatr ; 18(4): 425-429, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29428413

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our level 1 nursery and pediatric unit in a rural hospital adopted a family-centered, symptom-based oral morphine weaning protocol for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) in 2009. Length of stay (LOS), treatment duration (TD), and hospital charges for infants treated for NAS were then compared to published data in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) nationwide. METHODS: The electronic medical records of infants born January 1, 2011, to April 1, 2017, whose discharge diagnosis included an ICD-9 or ICD-10 code for NAS or prenatal drug exposure were paired with maternal electronic medical record and reviewed. TD was calculated by subtracting the last day morphine was provided from the day it was started, and LOS was calculated by subtracting the discharge date from the date of birth. Infant characteristics, maximum Finnegan score, breastfeeding, discharge disposition, maternal demographics, prenatal use of drugs or medications, and toxicology results were abstracted. Predictors of TD and LOS were analyzed, and hospital charges were enumerated. RESULTS: Chart review identified 167 infants with prenatal drug exposure, 33 of whom were treated for NAS. Median TD for infants with NAS was 18 days (range, 9-37 days) compared to 15 days (range, 9-25 days) in NICUs. Median LOS for infants treated for NAS was 22 days (range, 12-41 days) compared to 20 days (range, 12-32 days) in NICUs, but hospital charges were less. Maternal prenatal use of cocaine (P = .016) predicted LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Family-centered NAS treatment in a rural hospital lasted 2 to 3 days longer than in NICUs, largely as a result of social issues; however, hospital charges were less.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Rural , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Morphine/administration & dosage , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Breast Feeding , Cocaine-Related Disorders , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , New York , Nurseries, Hospital/economics , Opioid-Related Disorders , Patient Transfer , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications , Rooming-in Care , Substance-Related Disorders , Time Factors , Young Adult
14.
JAMA Pediatr ; 172(4): 345-351, 2018 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29404599

ABSTRACT

Importance: Rising incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is straining perinatal care systems. Newborns with NAS traditionally receive care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), but rooming-in with mother and family has been proposed to reduce the use of pharmacotherapy, length of stay (LOS), and cost. Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze if rooming-in is associated with improved outcomes for newborns with NAS. Data Sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from inception through June 25, 2017. Study Selection: This investigation included randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, quasi-experimental studies, and before-and-after quality improvement investigations comparing rooming-in vs standard NICU care for newborns with NAS. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two independent investigators reviewed studies for inclusion. A random-effects model was used to pool dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI. The study evaluated continuous outcomes using weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CI. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was newborn treatment with pharmacotherapy. Secondary outcomes included LOS, inpatient cost, and harms from treatment, including in-hospital adverse events and readmission rates. Results: Of 413 publications, 6 studies (n = 549 [number of patients]) met inclusion criteria. In meta-analysis of 6 studies, there was consistent evidence that rooming-in is preferable to NICU care for reducing both the use of pharmacotherapy (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.71; I2 = 85%) and LOS (WMD, -10.41 days; 95% CI, -16.84 to -3.98 days; I2 = 91%). Sensitivity analysis resolved the heterogeneity for the use of pharmacotherapy, significantly favoring rooming-in (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.57; I2 = 13%). Three studies reported that inpatient costs were lower with rooming-in; however, significant heterogeneity precluded quantitative analysis. Qualitative analysis favored rooming-in over NICU care for increasing breastfeeding rates and discharge home in familial custody, but few studies reported on these outcomes. Rooming-in was not associated with higher rates of readmission or in-hospital adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: Opioid-exposed newborns rooming-in with mother or other family members appear to be significantly less likely to be treated with pharmacotherapy and have substantial reductions in LOS compared with those cared for in NICUs. Rooming-in should be recommended as a preferred inpatient care model for NAS.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/therapy , Rooming-in Care , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Methadone/therapeutic use , Morphine/therapeutic use , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics
15.
Hosp Pediatr ; 8(1): 15-20, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29263122

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The national incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) has increased with the opioid epidemic in the United States. The impact of pharmacologic treatment on hospital use is not well established. We examined the recent population of neonates with NAS admitted to pediatric hospitals, hospital variation in pharmacologic treatment, and the effect of treatment on resource use during neonatal hospitalization, including length of stay (LOS), readmission, and cost-of-living adjusted hospital costs. METHODS: We included inpatients discharged between January 2013 and March 2016 from hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System. We compared neonates with NAS to those without on demographic, socioeconomic, clinical characteristics and hospital resource use. We also compared neonates with NAS on these characteristics by pharmacologic treatment. RESULTS: This analysis included 136 762 neonatal encounters from 23 hospitals. Of these, 2% had a diagnosis of NAS. Compared with other neonates, neonates with NAS had a longer LOS (18.7 vs 2.9 days; P = .004). Average costs per admission were 10 times higher for neonates with NAS ($37 584 vs $3536; P = .003). Of neonates with NAS, 70% were treated pharmacologically with wide variation in hospital rates of pharmacotherapy (range: 13%-90%). Pharmacologically-treated neonates with NAS experienced a longer LOS (22.0 vs 10.9 days; P = .004) than other neonates with NAS. Total costs for pharmacologically-treated neonates with NAS were over 2 times higher ($44 720 vs $20 708; P = .002) than neonates with NAS treated without pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Neonates with NAS, particularly those treated pharmacologically, have lengthier, more expensive hospital stays. Significant variation in pharmacologic treatment reflects opportunities for practice standardization and substantial reductions in resource use.


Subject(s)
Facilities and Services Utilization/economics , Hospital Costs , Hospitals, Pediatric/economics , Hospitals, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Morphine/therapeutic use , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/diagnosis , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Patient Readmission/economics , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology
16.
Am J Perinatol ; 35(4): 324-330, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29100261

ABSTRACT

Perinatal opioid misuse and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) are a significant public health problem that has grown exponentially over the past decade. In the United States, a woman seeks emergency room care for prescription opioid misuse every 3 minutes and approximately every 25 minutes, a child is born with signs of drug withdrawal. The economic impact of perinatal opioid misuse is significant with annual hospital charges for NOWS in 2012 as $1.5 billion dollars. Perinatal opioid misuse is a complex, multifaceted problem that demands a multidisciplinary cross specialty approach. This article will review the current state of NOWS and provide medical practitioners with a practical guide to enhance evidence based practice.


Subject(s)
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/therapy , Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/diagnosis , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , United States/epidemiology
17.
J Perinatol ; 37(10): 1108-1111, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28682317

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test a specialized needs-based management model for a high volume of babies born with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) while controlling costs and reducing neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) bed usage. STUDY DESIGN: Data were analyzed from inborn neonates >35 weeks' gestational age with the diagnosis of NAS (ICD9-CM 779.5), requiring pharmacologic treatment and discharged from 2010 through 2015. Significance was determined using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney as well as χ2 for trend. RESULTS: NAS requiring medication treatment increased from 34.1 per 1000 live births in 2010 to 94.3 per 1000 live births in 2015 (P<0.0001 for trend). Hospital charges were significantly different in the three described locations (P<0.0001). Median per patient hospital charges for medically treated NAS were $90 601 (interquartile range (IQR) $64 489 to $128 135) for NAS patients managed in the NICU, $68 750 (IQR $44 952 to $92 548) for those managed in an in-hospital dedicated unit and $17 688 (IQR $9933 to $20 033) for those cared for in an outpatient neonatal withdrawal center. NICU admission was avoided in 78% of the population once both alternative locations were fully implemented. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of infants, a 219% increase in the number of infants treated for NAS overwhelmed the capacity of our traditional resources. There was a need to develop new treatment approaches dealing with the NAS crisis and a growing population of prenatally exposed babies. We found that the described model of care significantly reduced charges and stabilized admissions to our NICU despite the marked increase in cases. Without this system, our NICU would be in a critical state of gridlock and diversion; instead, we have efficient management of a large NAS population.


Subject(s)
Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Patient Admission/economics , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Longitudinal Studies , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/drug therapy , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Statistics, Nonparametric
18.
Addiction ; 112(9): 1590-1599, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28612362

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: While hospital charges related to neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) have increased recently, there are no data available regarding costs. Therefore, we sought to describe the NAS population and compare with the non-NAS population, determine the incidence of NAS in the United States and estimate the total annual costs and hospital days of NAS admissions, and estimate the incremental costs and length of stay of an NAS admission compared with a non-NAS admission. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. Data were obtained from the Kids' Inpatient Database (2003-12). Survey-weighting was used to obtain national counts of NAS births. The incremental burden of costs and length of stay were estimated for NAS admissions and compared to non-NAS admissions. SETTING: United States hospitals from states participating in the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID), a nationally representative sample of all-payer in-patient pediatric discharges. PARTICIPANTS: Infants with a diagnosis of NAS (27 943) were identified from the KID using ICD-9-CM codes and compared with non-NAS infants (3 783 629). MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measures were provider costs and length of stay for NAS and non-NAS admissions. Costs were calculated using cost-to-charge ratios and were adjusted for inflation to 2014 US dollars. FINDINGS: Between 2003 and 2012, NAS admissions increased more than fourfold, resulting in a surge in annual costs from US$61 million and 67 869 hospital days in 2003 to nearly US$316 million and 291 168 hospital days in 2012. For an infant affected by NAS, the hospital stay was nearly 3.5 times as long (16.57 hospital days compared with 4.98 for a non-NAS patient, P < 0.001) and the costs more than three times greater (US$16 893 compared to US$5610 for a non-affected infant, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome is increasing in the United States, and carries an enormous burden in terms of hospital days and costs. The number of US hospital admissions involving neonatal abstinence syndrome increased more than fourfold between the years 2003 and 2012. In 2012, neonatal abstinence syndrome cost nearly $316 million in the United States.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Retrospective Studies , United States
19.
Popul Health Manag ; 20(6): 458-464, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28409699

ABSTRACT

In recent years, neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) rates have increased rapidly across the United States, rising from 1.2 (2000) to 5.8 (2012) per 1000 hospital births annually. Because most NAS infants are treated in an intensive care setting, associated hospital charges are high and continue to escalate, rising on average from $39,400 in 2000 to $66,700 in 2012. An innovative NAS treatment program, which includes early-initiated methadone therapy, rooming-in, and combined inpatient/outpatient weaning in a low-acuity nursery, has been in place since 2003 at a large Southeastern hospital. The program has proven safe, effective and low cost for treating infants of ≥35 weeks gestational age whose mothers used long-acting opioids. Given that 81% of NAS cases in the United States are funded by Medicaid programs and that the cost burden is rising rapidly, researchers considered the potential saved charges associated with implementing the same program in other hospitals state- and nationwide. Researchers used regression models to project state and national NAS birth rates from 2015-2025 and to predict future NAS charges under current treatment protocols. Three scenarios were developed to compare the potential saved charges of implementing the innovative NAS treatment program across the state and nation with assumptions related to the percent of NAS infants eligible for the program, percent funded by Medicaid, and fluctuations in average length of stay. The potential saved charges are substantial, creating a compelling case for policy makers and hospitals in the pursuit of safe, effective, and cost-conscious NAS care.


Subject(s)
Cost Savings , Medicaid , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome , Cost Savings/economics , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Medicaid/economics , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Models, Economic , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/therapy , United States
20.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 39(3): 157-165, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28343557

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data characterizing mother-infant pairs with prenatal opioid dependence in Canada. We therefore conducted a study of relevant births in Ontario from 2002 to 2014. METHODS: We used data from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, the linked databases of coded population-based Ontario health services records. Differences in characteristics of opioid-dependent mother-neonate pairs and infant hospital costs by year were assessed using linear regression, and we calculated rates of preterm birth, low birth weight, birth defects, mortality, and neonatal abstinence syndrome. RESULTS: The number of infants born to opioid-dependent women in Ontario rose from 46 in 2002 to almost 800 in 2014. Methadone was most frequently used for prenatal opioid dependence; there was little buprenorphine or buprenorphine + naloxone use. Rates of preterm birth and low birth weight were high. The proportion of neonates with neonatal abstinence syndrome (58%) was stable over the study period. The mean length of neonatal hospital stay was 13.96 days. Infant hospital costs increased from $724 774 in 2003 to $10 539 988 in 2013, and the mean cost per infant grew from $9928 to $12 917. Birth defect prevalence was 75.84/1000 live births (95% CI 68.12/1000 to 84.10/1000). The stillbirth rate was 11.39/1000 births (95% CI 8.47/1000 to 14.99/1000), and the infant mortality rate was 12.21/1000 live births (95% CI 9.16/1000 to 15.95/1000). CONCLUSION: We observed a 16-fold increase in the number of mother-infant pairs affected by opioid dependence in Ontario over the past decade. Adverse birth outcome rates were high. Expanded services for opioid-dependent women and their children are needed.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Adult , Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Databases, Factual , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Infant , Infant Mortality , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay , Male , Methadone/therapeutic use , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Narcotics/therapeutic use , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Ontario/epidemiology , Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...