A nationwide survey on neonatal medical resources in mainland China: current status and future challenges.

BACKGROUND: With the rapid development of economy in recent two decades, neonatology has been progressing quickly in China. However, there is little knowledge about the exact developmental status of neonatal departments in China. The aim of this study was to assess resources available for care of sick newborns in mainland China. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to the membership of the Chinese Neonatologist Association (CNA) and used to survey the scale, facilities, staff, technologies, transport systems and preterm infants' outcomes of neonatal departments (NDs) in different areas of China from June 2012 to December 2012. RESULTS: The result of this survey including a total of 117 questionnaires showed that investigated ND had a mean of 65 (median 47; range 5-450) beds, including 19.59 (median 15, range 0-100) NICU beds. The overall doctor/bed and nurse/bed ratio was 1:3.84 and 1:1.43, respectively. Lack of medical equipment was one of the main problems in most NDs surveyed, and only 26 NDs (22.2%) had more than one neonatal incubator per bed. Only 70.1, 30.6, 30.8 and 4.3% NDs carried out high-frequency ventilation, hypothermia, nitric oxide inhalation, and ECMO respectively. The capacity to provide advanced therapies increased with the size of the NDs (P < .01). A total of 81 NDs (69.2%) carried out neonatal transport, but only 70 NDs (86.4%) were equipped with transport incubators, 36 NDs (44.4%) had the ability of performing intrauterine transport of the preterm infants, and 3 NDs (3.7%) had the ability of performing air transport. The survival rate of extremely preterm infants (Gestational age less than 28w) to discharge home was 47.8% in 2011. CONCLUSION: NDs in mainland China are not well distributed and still face many problems, such as staff shortage, inadequate facilities, and imperfect transport. It is urgent to set up a classification of neonatal care to enhance the utilization rate of medical resources and improve the prognosis of critically ill infants.

Impact of neonatologist availability on preterm survival without morbidities.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed birth hospital level and neonatal outcomes within a model of regionalization featuring neonatologists at all levels of care, including well-baby nurseries without an accompanying neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: Data were analyzed by NY State adaptation of American Academy of Pediatrics defined levels of care; n = 998, 23-30 weeks gestational age, 400-1250 g birth weight, and admitted to the regional center (2006-2015). Primary outcomes were survival, neurologic survival, and intact survival. RESULTS: Level III hospitals transferred 82% of neonates ≥24 h of life compared to ≤2% at Level I or II hospitals (p < 0.05). Primary outcomes were equivalent for Levels I vs. II born neonates with similar postnatal age at transfer and similar to inborn rates (Levels I and II vs. IV). CONCLUSIONS: When transferred within 24 h, Levels I or II born infants had equivalent outcomes to inborn Level IV infants in a model of neonatologist availability at all deliveries.