Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Publication year range
1.
Cir Cir ; 82(2): 129-41, 2014.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25312311

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ still controversial, with positive lymph node in range of 1.4-12.5% due occult invasive breast carcinoma in surgical specimen. OBJECTIVE: To know the frequency of sentimel node metastases in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ, identify differences between positive and negative cases. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy because mastectomy indication, palpable tumor, radiological lesion = 5 cm, non-favorable breast-tumor relation and/or patients whom surgery could affect lymphatic flow drainage. RESULTS: Of 168 in situ carcinomas, 50 cases with ductal carcinoma in situ and sentinel lymph node biopsy were included, with a mean age of 51.6 years, 30 (60%) asymptomatic. The most common symptoms were palpable nodule (18%), nipple discharge (12%), or both (8%). Microcalcifications were common (72%), comedonecrosis pattern (62%), grade-2 histology (44%), and 28% negative hormonal receptors. Four (8%) cases had intra-operatory positive sentinel lymph node and one patient at final histo-pathological study (60% micrometastases, 40% macrometastases), all with invasive carcinoma in surgical specimen. Patients with intra-operatory positive sentinel lymph node where younger (44.5 vs 51 years), with more palpable tumors (50% vs 23.1%), and bigger (3.5 vs 2 cm), more comedonecrosis pattern (75% vs 60.8%), more indifferent tumors (75% vs 39.1%), and less cases with hormonal receptors (50% vs 73.9%), compared with negative sentinel lymph node cases, all these differences without statistic significance. CONCLUSIONS: One of each 12 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ had affection in sentinel lymph node, so we recommend continue doing this procedure to avoid second surgeries due the presence of occult invasive carcinoma.


Antecedentes: en pacientes con carcinoma ductal in situ la biopsia de ganglio centinela es motivo de controversia porque se reportan ganglios positivos en 1.4-12.5% debido al carcinoma invasor oculto en la pieza quirúrgica. Objetivo: conocer la frecuencia de metástasis en ganglio centinela en pacientes con carcinoma ductal in situ e identificar las diferencias entre los casos positivos y negativos. Material y métodos: estudio retrospectivo, transversal, analítico de pacientes con carcinoma ductal in situ a quienes se realizó una biopsia de ganglio centinela por requerir mastectomía, tener un tumor palpable, lesión radiológica = 5 cm, inadecuada relación mama-tumor o porque la escisión pudiera afectar el flujo linfático. Resultados: de 168 carcinomas in situ, se incluyeron 50 casos con carcinoma ductal in situ y biopsia de ganglio centinela, de pacientes con edad promedio de 51.6 años, 30 (60%) de ellas asintomáticas. Los signos reportados fueron: nódulo palpable (18%), secreción por el pezón (12%) o ambos (8%). Predominaron las microcalcificaciones (72%), comedonecrosis (62%) y grado histológico -2 (44%) con 28% de receptores hormonales negativos. En el estudio transoperatorio 4 (8%) pacientes tuvieron ganglio centinela positivo y un caso en estudio histopatológico definitivo (60% micrometástasis, 40% macrometástasis), todos con carcinoma invasor en la pieza quirúrgica. Las pacientes con ganglio centinela transoperatorio positivo eran más jóvenes (44.5 vs 51 años), con más tumores palpables (50 vs 23.1%), más grandes (3.5 vs 2 cm), más comedonecrosis (75 vs 60.8%), más indiferenciados (75% vs 39.1%) y menos receptores hormonales (50 vs 73.9%), que las que tenían ganglio centinela negativo, sin que estas diferencias tuvieran significación estadística. Conclusiones: puesto que 1 de cada 12 pacientes con carcinoma ductal in situ tiene afectación ganglionar en el ganglio centinela, se recomienda seguir tomando la biopsia para evitar segundas cirugías por un carcinoma invasor oculto.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/secondary , Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnosis , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Adult , Axilla , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Lobular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Lobular/secondary , Estrogens , Female , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Mammography , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/secondary , Nipple Aspirate Fluid , Progesterone , Reproductive History
2.
Cancer Lett ; 258(1): 126-34, 2007 Dec 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17933458

ABSTRACT

Riboflavin is a potent photosensitizer as well as part of the vitamin B complex. Recently we demonstrated that the products generated by irradiation of riboflavin have potential as anti-leukaemic therapy. The possible action, however, of the riboflavin photoproducts in solid cancers has not been addressed. Hence, we investigated the effects of irradiated riboflavin on androgen-independent human prostate cancer cells (PC3), a known model for solid tumour cells with an exceptional resistance to therapy. Our results show that riboflavin photoproducts are cytotoxic to these cells in a FasL-Fas-dependent manner. Furthermore, irradiated riboflavin inhibited matrix-degrading proteases, caused downregulation of VEGF and upregulation of TIMP1 suggesting anti-metastatic potential. Together, these results show that the anti-neoplastic action of riboflavin photoproducts is not limited to haematological malignancies, warranting clinical studies in solid tumours.


Subject(s)
Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/drug therapy , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Riboflavin/pharmacology , Animals , Apoptosis/drug effects , Blotting, Western , Caspases/metabolism , Cells, Cultured/drug effects , Hepatocytes/cytology , Hepatocytes/drug effects , Hepatocytes/metabolism , Humans , Male , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/secondary , Prostate/cytology , Prostate/drug effects , Prostate/metabolism , Rats
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL