Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 41
Filter
1.
Bull Cancer ; 108(4): 352-358, 2021 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33678407

ABSTRACT

In a few situations, the consequences secondary to a carcinological pathology require an assessment of damages for compensatory purposes. This is particularly the case when liable parties have been found to be at cause of the disease: occupational pathologies in the case of inexcusable employer's fault, exposure to a radioactive risk, for example in the context of full compensation for damages suffered by the victims of nuclear experiments performed by France, or lastly, in the after-effects of late diagnosis. This article does not discuss the imputability of cancer pathologies to an event, but it proposes an adaptation of methods for assessing damages, in an attempt to provide full compensation for damages.


Subject(s)
Compensation and Redress/legislation & jurisprudence , Liability, Legal , Neoplasms , Occupational Diseases , Causality , Disability Evaluation , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Esthetics , France , Human Experimentation/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Learning Disabilities/etiology , Liability, Legal/economics , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Pain , Postoperative Complications , Radiation Injuries/economics , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/etiology , Social Responsibility
2.
BMJ ; 368: m7, 2020 02 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32019742

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether an association exists between financial links to the indoor tanning industry and conclusions of indoor tanning literature. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, up to 15 February 2019. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Articles discussing indoor tanning and health were eligible for inclusion, with no article type restrictions (original research, systematic reviews, review articles, case reports, editorials, commentaries, and letters were all eligible). Basic science studies, articles describing only indoor tanning prevalence, non-English articles, and articles without full text available were excluded. RESULTS: 691 articles were included in analysis, including empiric articles (eg, original articles or systematic reviews) (357/691; 51.7%) and non-empiric articles letters (eg, commentaries, letters, or editorials) (334/691; 48.3%). Overall, 7.2% (50/691) of articles had financial links to the indoor tanning industry; 10.7% (74/691) articles favored indoor tanning, 3.9% (27/691) were neutral, and 85.4% (590/691) were critical of indoor tanning. Among the articles without industry funding, 4.4% (27/620) favored indoor tanning, 3.5% (22/620) were neutral, and 92.1% (571/620) were critical of indoor tanning. Among the articles with financial links to the indoor tanning industry, 78% (39/50) favored indoor tanning, 10% (5/50) were neutral, and 12% (6/50) were critical of indoor tanning. Support from the indoor tanning industry was significantly associated with favoring indoor tanning (risk ratio 14.3, 95% confidence interval 10.0 to 20.4). CONCLUSIONS: Although most articles in the indoor tanning literature are independent of industry funding, articles with financial links to the indoor tanning industry are more likely to favor indoor tanning. Public health practitioners and researchers need to be aware of and account for industry funding when interpreting the evidence related to indoor tanning. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019123617.


Subject(s)
Conflict of Interest , Industry/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Sunbathing/economics , Sunbathing/statistics & numerical data , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Humans , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Research Support as Topic , Skin Neoplasms/economics
3.
Health Phys ; 117(6): 625-636, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31283545

ABSTRACT

In 1966, about 1,600 US military men-mostly Air Force-participated in a cleanup of plutonium dispersed from two nuclear bombs in Palomares, Spain. As a base for future analyses, we provide a history of the Palomares incident, including the dosimetry and risk analyses carried out to date and the compensation assessments made for veterans. By law, compensation for illnesses attributed to ionizing radiation is based on maximum estimated doses and standard risk coefficients, with considerable benefit of the doubt given to claimants when there is uncertainty. In the Palomares case, alpha activity in urine fell far faster than predicted by plutonium biokinetic excretion models used at the time. Most of the measurements were taken on-site but were disqualified on the grounds that they were "unreasonably high" and because there was a possibility of environmental contamination. Until the end of 2013, the Air Force used low dose estimates derived from environmental measurements carried out well after the cleanup. After these estimates were questioned by Congress, the Air Force adopted higher dose estimates based on plutonium concentration measurements in urine samples collected from 26 veterans after they left Palomares. The Air Force assumed that all other cleanup veterans received lower doses and therefore assigned to them maximum organ doses based on the individual among the 26 with the lowest urine measurements. These resulting maximum organ doses appear to be sufficient to justify compensation to all Palomares veterans with lung and bone cancer and early-onset liver cancer and leukemia but not other radiogenic cancers.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Plutonium/analysis , Radiation Exposure/analysis , Radioactive Fallout/analysis , Workers' Compensation/economics , Humans , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Plutonium/poisoning , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radioactive Fallout/adverse effects , Radioactive Hazard Release , Radiometry , Risk Assessment/methods , Spain , United States , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Workers' Compensation/standards
4.
Laryngoscope ; 125(1): E45-9, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25043810

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine whether there is an association between radon levels and the rise in incidence of thyroid cancer in Pennsylvania. STUDY DESIGN: Epidemiological study of the state of Pennsylvania. METHODS: We used information from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry and the Pennsylvania Department of Energy. From the registry, information regarding thyroid incidence by county and zip code was recorded. Information regarding radon levels per county was recorded from the state. Poisson regression models were fit predicting county-level thyroid incidence and change as a function of radon/lagged radon levels. To account for measurement error in the radon levels, a Bayesian Model extending the Poisson models was fit. Geospatial clustering analysis was also performed. RESULTS: No association was noted between cumulative radon levels and thyroid incidence. In the Poisson modeling, no significant association was noted between county radon level and thyroid cancer incidence (P = .23). Looking for a lag between the radon level and its effect, no significant effect was seen with a lag of 0 to 6 years between exposure and effect (P = .063 to P = .59). The Bayesian models also failed to show a statistically significant association. A cluster of high thyroid cancer incidence was found in western Pennsylvania. CONCLUSIONS: Through a variety of models, no association was elicited between annual radon levels recorded in Pennsylvania and the rising incidence of thyroid cancer. However, a cluster of thyroid cancer incidence was found in western Pennsylvania. Further studies may be helpful in looking for other exposures or associations.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Radon/adverse effects , Radon/analysis , Thyroid Neoplasms/epidemiology , Thyroid Neoplasms/etiology , Bayes Theorem , Causality , Cluster Analysis , Humans , Incidence , Pennsylvania , Poisson Distribution , Registries , Topography, Medical
5.
Health Phys ; 106(2): 249-58, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24378500

ABSTRACT

Since the mid-1940s, hundreds of thousands of workers have been engaged in nuclear weapons-related activities for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies. In 2000, Congress promulgated the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA), which provides monetary compensation and medical benefits to certain energy employees who have developed cancer. Under Part B of EEOICPA, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) is required to estimate radiation doses for those workers who have filed a claim, or whose survivors have filed a claim, under Part B of the Act. To date, over 39,000 dose reconstructions have been completed for workers from more than 200 facilities. These reconstructions have included assessment of both internal and external exposure at all major DOE facilities, as well as at a large number of private companies [known as Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) facilities in the Act] that engaged in contract work for the DOE and its predecessor agencies. To complete these dose reconstructions, NIOSH has captured and reviewed thousands of historical documents related to site operations and worker/workplace monitoring practices at these facilities. Using the data collected and reviewed pursuant to NIOSH's role under EEOICPA, this presentation will characterize historical internal and external exposures received by workers at DOE and AWE facilities. To the extent possible, use will be made of facility specific coworker models to highlight changes in exposure patterns over time. In addition, the effects that these exposures have on compensation rates for workers are discussed.Introduction of Characterization of Exposures to Workers (Video 1:59, http://links.lww.com/HP/A3).


Subject(s)
Government Agencies/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Compensation and Redress , Demography , Humans , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Occupational Exposure/economics , Radiation Dosage , United States , Uranium/chemistry , Uranium/isolation & purification
7.
Obstet Gynecol ; 122(4): 821-829, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24084540

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic laparoscopy, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after indeterminate ultrasonography in pregnant women with suspected appendicitis. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was developed to simulate appendicitis during pregnancy taking into consideration the health outcomes for both the pregnant women and developing fetuses. Strategies included diagnostic laparoscopy, CT, and MRI. Outcomes included positive appendectomy, negative appendectomy, maternal perioperative complications, preterm delivery, fetal loss, childhood cancer, lifetime costs, discounted life expectancy, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging is the most cost-effective strategy, costing $6,767 per quality-adjusted life-year gained relative to CT, well below the generally accepted $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year threshold. In a setting where MRI is unavailable, CT is cost-effective even when considering the increased risk of radiation-associated childhood cancer ($560 per quality-adjusted life-year gained relative to diagnostic laparoscopy). Unless the negative appendectomy rate is less than 1%, imaging of any type is more cost-effective than proceeding directly to diagnostic laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on imaging costs and resource availability, both CT and MRI are potentially cost-effective. The risk of radiation-associated childhood cancer from CT has little effect on population-level outcomes or cost-effectiveness but is a concern for individual patients. For pregnant women with suspected appendicitis, an extremely high level of clinical diagnostic certainty must be reached before proceeding to operation without preoperative imaging.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Preoperative Period , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
9.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 18(7): 1240-8, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21928375

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim was to examine the cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) compared with computed tomography enterography (CTE) for routine imaging of small bowel Crohn's disease (CD) patients to reduce patients' life-time radiation-induced cancer risk. METHODS: We developed a Markov model to compare the lifetime costs, benefits (measured in quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] of survival and cancers averted) and cost-effectiveness of using MRE rather than CTE for routine disease monitoring in hypothetical cohorts of 100,000 20-year-old patients with CD. We assumed each CT radiation exposure conferred an incremental annual risk of developing cancer using the linear, no-threshold model. RESULTS: In the base case of 16 mSv per CTE, we estimated that radiation from CTE resulted in 1,206 to 20,146 additional cancers depending on the frequency of patient monitoring. Compared to using CTE only, using MRE until age 30 and CTE thereafter resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) between $37,538 and $41,031 per life-year (LY) gained and between $52,969 and $57,772 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Using MRE until age 50 resulted in ICERs between $58,022 and $62,648 per LY gained and between $84,250 and $90,982 per QALY gained. In a threshold analysis, any use of MRE had an ICER of greater than $100,000 per QALY gained when CT radiation doses are less than 6.0 mSv per CTE exam. CONCLUSIONS: MRE is likely cost-effective compared to CTE in patients younger than age 50. Low-dose CTE may be an alternative cost-effective choice in the future.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Crohn Disease/diagnostic imaging , Crohn Disease/economics , Models, Economic , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/prevention & control , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Adult , Crohn Disease/pathology , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
10.
Comput Math Methods Med ; 2012: 414683, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22110550

ABSTRACT

Like in every type of cancer, in skin cancer the efficiency of the medical treatment is very important. In the present paper, a Bayesian model for the management of this disease is given, and a medical index to measure the effectiveness of treatment from medical, economical, and quality of life point of view is presented, taking into account some of the patients characteristics.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/economics , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Bayes Theorem , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Models, Statistical , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects
11.
Injury ; 43(9): 1423-31, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21835403

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic management strategies for adults with minor head injury. METHODS: A mathematical model was constructed to evaluate the incremental costs and effectiveness (Quality Adjusted Life years Gained, QALYs) of ten diagnostic management strategies for adults with minor head injuries. Secondary analyses were undertaken to determine the cost-effectiveness of hospital admission compared to discharge home and to explore the cost-effectiveness of strategies when no responsible adult was available to observe the patient after discharge. RESULTS: The apparent optimal strategy was based on the high and medium risk Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHRhm), although the costs and outcomes associated with each strategy were broadly similar. Hospital admission for patients with non-neurosurgical injury on CT dominated discharge home, whilst hospital admission for clinically normal patients with a normal CT was not cost-effective compared to discharge home with or without a responsible adult at £39 and £2.5 million per QALY, respectively. A selective CT strategy with discharge home if the CT scan was normal remained optimal compared to not investigating or CT scanning all patients when there was no responsible adult available to observe them after discharge. CONCLUSION: Our economic analysis confirms that the recent extension of access to CT scanning for minor head injury is appropriate. Liberal use of CT scanning based on a high sensitivity decision rule is not only effective but also cost-saving. The cost of CT scanning is very small compared to the estimated cost of caring for patients with brain injury worsened by delayed treatment. It is recommended therefore that all hospitals receiving patients with minor head injury should have unrestricted access to CT scanning for use in conjunction with evidence based guidelines. Provisionally the CCHRhm decision rule appears to be the best strategy although there is considerable uncertainty around the optimal decision rule. However, the CCHRhm rule appears to be the most widely validated and it therefore seems appropriate to conclude that the CCHRhm rule has the best evidence to support its use.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma/diagnostic imaging , Craniocerebral Trauma/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Patient Discharge/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/prevention & control , Sensitivity and Specificity , United Kingdom/epidemiology
12.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 9(8): 608-16, 2011 Aug.
Article in English, German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21501381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15 % of all cases of melanoma are diagnosed before age 35 years. In Germany, individuals ≥ 35 years are eligible for the national skin cancer screening program. The effectiveness of a population-based skin cancer screening in general and in particular for young adults is unclear. OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the effectiveness of a skin cancer screening program and of risk factors for detection of a melanoma/atypical nevus in the setting of a screening for the age group 14 to 34 years. METHODS: A total of 12,187 individuals age 14 to 34 years were screened in Saxony for skin cancer by a dermatologist in the program "Haut-Check 14-34 Jahre" of the AOK PLUS, a large German health insurance, between January and July 2009. Demographic, clinical and histopathological data and UV-exposure data were collected from each participant. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess risk factors for the detection of a (histopathologically confirmed) melanoma or atypical nevus. RESULTS: 2.8 % of the eligible individuals participated in the skin cancer screening program with women being more likely to do so. In 1 072 individuals (8.8 %) screening included at least one excision of a skin lesion leading to the diagnosis of melanoma in two participants, melanoma in situ in four persons, and atypical nevus in 641 persons. Use of tanning beds, higher age, number of nevi, and previous cutaneous excision were independent risk factors for the detection of a melanoma or atypical nevus. CONCLUSIONS: In 5.5 % of all cases skin cancer screening resulted in the excision of a malignant or atypical melanocytic lesion. It remains unclear what proportion of these cases would have been detected in routine care. The rate of excisions per newly diagnosed melanoma was 179 : 1. Further investigations are necessary to explore the reasons for this low diagnostic specificity. This study highlights the possibilities and limitations of routine data to evaluate screening programs and indicates the need to collect additional information on healthcare utilization behaviour.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Melanoma/economics , Melanoma/surgery , National Health Programs/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/surgery , Nevus, Pigmented/diagnosis , Nevus, Pigmented/economics , Nevus, Pigmented/epidemiology , Nevus, Pigmented/surgery , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/economics , Precancerous Conditions/epidemiology , Precancerous Conditions/surgery , Program Evaluation , Skin Neoplasms/economics , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Young Adult
13.
BMJ ; 338: a3110, 2009 Jan 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19129153

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the number of deaths from lung cancer related to radon in the home and to explore the cost effectiveness of alternative policies to control indoor radon and their potential to reduce lung cancer mortality. DESIGN: Cost effectiveness analysis. SETTING: United Kingdom. DATA SOURCES: Epidemiological data on risks from indoor radon and from smoking, vital statistics on deaths from lung cancer, survey information on effectiveness and costs of radon prevention and remediation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimated number of deaths from lung cancer related to indoor radon, lifetime risks of death from lung cancer before and after various potential interventions to control radon, the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained from different policies for control of radon, and the potential of those policies to reduce lung cancer mortality. RESULTS: The mean radon concentration in UK homes is 21 becquerels per cubic metre (Bq/m(3)). Each year around 1100 deaths from lung cancer (3.3% of all deaths from lung cancer) are related to radon in the home. Over 85% of these arise from radon concentrations below 100 Bq/m(3) and most are caused jointly by radon and active smoking. Current policy requiring basic measures to prevent radon in new homes in selected areas is highly cost effective, and such measures would remain cost effective if extended to the entire UK, with a cost per QALY gained of pound11,400 ( euro12 200; $16,913). Current policy identifying and remediating existing homes with high radon levels is, however, neither cost effective (cost per QALY gained pound36,800) nor effective in reducing lung cancer mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Policies requiring basic preventive measures against radon in all new homes throughout the UK would be cost effective and could complement existing policies to reduce smoking. Policies involving remedial work on existing homes with high radon levels cannot prevent most radon related deaths, as these are caused by moderate exposure in many homes. These conclusions are likely to apply to most developed countries, many with higher mean radon concentrations than the UK.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects , Carcinogens, Environmental/toxicity , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/mortality , Radon/toxicity , Aged , Air Pollution, Indoor/economics , Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Environmental Exposure/economics , Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Environmental Restoration and Remediation/economics , Government Programs/economics , Health Policy/economics , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/economics , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Program Evaluation , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk Assessment , United Kingdom/epidemiology
14.
Minn Med ; 92(12): 42-4, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20092172

ABSTRACT

Publicized cases of errant high radiation exposure delivered to patients undergoing diagnostic imaging have led to heightened awareness and scrutiny of the costs and benefits of imaging by physicians, the public, and policymakers.The statistical risks associated with the ever-increasing utilization of modalities employing damaging ionizing radiation across the population are compounded by the development of the latest generation of devices, which are capable of delivering greater radiation doses than their predecessors for comparable diagnostic applications.This article reviews the fundamental concepts and risks of medical radiation exposure, trends in imaging utilization, and the role of radiologists and their physician colleagues in managing and appropriately utilizing imaging for patient diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/adverse effects , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Adult , Child , Diagnostic Imaging/economics , Health Care Costs/trends , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/prevention & control , Physician Self-Referral , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Injuries/economics , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Tomography, Emission-Computed/adverse effects , Tomography, Emission-Computed/economics , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , United States , Unnecessary Procedures/adverse effects , Unnecessary Procedures/economics
15.
Pediatrics ; 121(5): e1074-84, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18450850

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The SunWise School Program is a school-based sun safety education program that was developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency and aims to teach children how to protect themselves from overexposure to the sun. The objectives of this study were to assess the health benefits of the SunWise School Program and use economic analysis to determine the program's net benefits and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: Standard cost/benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis methods were used. Intervention costs were measured as program costs estimated to be incurred by the US government, which funds SunWise, using 3 funding scenarios. Health outcomes were measured as skin cancer cases and premature mortalities averted and quality-adjusted life-years saved. These health outcomes were modeled using an effectiveness evaluation of SunWise based on pretest and posttest surveys administered to students who participated in the program and the Environmental Protection Agency's peer-reviewed Atmospheric and Health Effects Framework model. Costs averted were measured as direct medical costs and costs of productivity losses averted as a result of SunWise. Net benefits were measured as the difference between costs averted and program costs. RESULTS: Economic analysis indicated that if the SunWise School Program continues through 2015 at current funding levels, then it should avert >50 premature deaths, nearly 11,000 skin cancer cases, and 960 quality-adjusted life-years (undiscounted) among its participants. For every dollar invested in SunWise, between approximately $2 and $4 in medical care costs and productivity losses are saved, depending on the funding scenario. CONCLUSIONS: From a cost/benefit and cost-effectiveness perspective, it is worthwhile to educate children about sun safety; small to modest behavioral impacts may result in significant reductions in skin cancer incidence and mortality.


Subject(s)
Health Education , Sunlight/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Educational Measurement , Health Behavior , Health Care Costs , Health Education/economics , Humans , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/prevention & control , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , School Health Services , Skin Neoplasms/economics , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , United States
17.
Radiologe ; 48(1): 17-25, 2008 Jan.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18030441

ABSTRACT

Available data suggest that early detection of breast cancer by mammography screening can reduce mortality by about 25%. Intensified monitoring of women with a family history of breast cancer and regular general screening have recently been introduced in Germany. The screening program is expected to be fully established by 2008. Following its successful introduction (participation rates between 65 and 80%), the German screening program will be conducted and evaluated in accordance with the European guidelines. At least in the screening trials that were conducted prior to the now established screening program the quality criteria were more than fulfilled (e.g. cancer detection rate in Bremen 8.7, Wiesbaden 9.4, Weser-Ems region 8.3/1000). Additional parameters that can be taken into account for quality assurance are the overdiagnosis bias, lead time bias, length bias and selection bias. Moreover, there are some factors that are specific to the German program compared with the breast cancer screening programs already established in other countries. One of these is the intensified screening program for high-risk women (ca. 5% of all carcinomas) and as a result fewer women with an increased genetic risk of breast cancer will be represented in the general screening program. The German screening program involves only a few university centers and hospital-based physicians, which may have adverse effects on research and development as well as mammography training in the future. Therefore, the screening program should also provide for the investigation of new techniques or emerging techniques (e.g. CAD systems in screening mammography) in the future.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mammography/standards , Mass Screening/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Early Diagnosis , Female , Germany , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Mammography/adverse effects , Mammography/economics , Mass Screening/economics , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiation Dosage , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
18.
Sci Total Environ ; 366(1): 32-46, 2006 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16574198

ABSTRACT

Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas, high levels of which are associated with geological formations such as those found in Northamptonshire and North Oxfordshire in the UK. The UK's National Radiological Protection Board have designated both districts as radon Affected Areas. Radiation levels due to radon, therefore, exceed 200 Bq m(-3), the UK's domestic Action Level, in over one percent of domestic properties. Because of radon's radioactivity, exposure to the gas can potentially cause lung cancer, and has been linked to some 2000 deaths a year in the UK. Consequently, when radiation levels exceed the Action Level, remediation against radon's effects is recommended to householders. This study examines the cost-effectiveness of remediation measures in Northamptonshire and North Oxfordshire by estimating cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained in four Primary Care Trusts, organisations that play a key public health policy role in the UK's National Health Service. The study is the first to apply this approach to estimating the cost-effectiveness of radon remediation programmes. Central estimates of cost per quality-adjusted life-year in the four Primary Care Trusts range from 6143pounds to 10323pounds. These values, when assessed against generally accepted criteria, suggest the remediation programmes in the trusts were cost-effective. Policy suggestions based on the estimates, and designed to improve cost-effectiveness further, are proposed for the four Primary Care Trusts and the UK's National Health Service.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Radioactive/economics , Environmental Exposure/economics , Lung Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Preventive Health Services/economics , Radon/analysis , Air Pollution, Radioactive/prevention & control , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , England , Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Geography , Housing , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/prevention & control , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/prevention & control
20.
AAOHN J ; 53(6): 267-77; quiz 278-9, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16018539

ABSTRACT

Nurses make a bureaucracy work on behalf of clients. Occupational health nurses who are already versed in basic concepts applicable to EEOICPA--confidence intervals, occupational histories, exposure assessment, and dose response--can play constructive, caring roles in assisting claimants in securing benefits under this landmark program. Occupational health nurses know that chronically ill employees have a finite number of hours a week to make phone calls, visit providers, and advocate on their own behalf. Thoughtful referrals to occupational health providers who are both experienced and supportive can come from an occupational health nurse or a family physician. Involvement of university-based programs in projects to empower organizations representing EEOICP claimants would be a welcome development.


Subject(s)
Berylliosis/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Occupational Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Workers' Compensation/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. , Silicosis/economics , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...