History of lower limb reconstruction after trauma.

BACKGROUND: The principles guiding reconstruction of the lower limb after trauma have become established over 300 years through advances in technology and studies of epidemiology. This paper reviews how these principles came about and why they are important. METHODS: This is a structured review of historical and recent literature pertinent to lower limb reconstruction. The outcomes assessed in the pre-modern era were wound mortality, amputation mortality and amputation rate. In the modern era, infection and non-union emerged as measures of outcome, which are morbidity- rather than mortality-based. Indications for amputation published during the eras are taken to reflect the reconstructive practices of the time. RESULTS: Amputation and wound mortality fell throughout the pre-modern era, from 70% and 20% to 1.8% and 1.8%, respectively. Amputation rates peaked in the American Civil War (53%) but have remained less than 20% since then. Infection and non-union rates in the modern era have fluctuated between 5% and 45%. CONCLUSIONS: Priority areas for research include refinement of soft tissue reconstruction, injury classification, standardization of outcome measures and primary prevention. The impact of débridement and antisepsis on outcomes should not be forgotten as progress is made.

Otfrid Foerster (1873-1941)--self-taught neurosurgeon and innovator of reconstructive peripheral nerve surgery.

Otfrid Foerster (1873-1941) became a self-taught neurosurgeon during and after WW I, playing a critical role in the development of peripheral nerve reconstruction. Although best known for describing dermatomes, he published over 300 articles on the nervous system. Confronted by thousands of nerve injuries during WW I, as well as poor results and disinterest from his surgical colleagues, Foerster began performing neurolysis and tension-free nerve repairs himself under emergency conditions. He pioneered grafting motor nerve defects by expendable cutaneous nerves (e.g., sural) and performed intraplexal neurotizations and various nerve transfers, such as the pectoral, subscapular, long thoracic, and thoracodorsal nerves in brachial plexus injuries. Foerster championed rehabilitation, recognizing the potential of electrostimulation and physiotherapy to influence cortical reorganization (brain plasticity) and improve recovery after nerve injury. Foerster died from tuberculosis in 1941, leaving a rich reconstructive peripheral nerve legacy; his innovative and visionary spirit serves as a role model.

Introduction: peripheral nerve surgery--biology, entrapment, and injuries.

Surgery aimed at repairing damaged peripheral nerves has a long history. Refuting the time-honored nihilism of Hippocrates and Galen that an injured nerve cannot regain function, a few adventurous medieval surgeons attempted to repair severed nerves. However, the ability of a peripheral nerve repair to restore function was not generally accepted until 1800. Neurosurgeons, beginning with Harvey Cushing, have had an interest in repairing damaged peripheral nerves. Significant progress in the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries resulted from experience with the numerous injuries that occurred during World Wars I and II. Surgeons steadily defined the anatomy of peripheral nerves and developed techniques for decompressing and repairing peripheral nerves. Kline and Dejonge developed an intraoperative electrophysiological technique for detecting axons regenerating across a damaged segment of nerve. In the second 2 decades of the 20th century, distal nerve transfers were rediscovered whereby the proximal end of a less essential nerve is used to reinnervate the distal end of a nerve, providing a more vital function.

Sir Charles Alfred Ballance (1856-1936) and the introduction of facial nerve crossover anastomosis in 1895.

Sir Charles Ballance (1856-1936) was the first surgeon in history to perform a facial nerve crossover anastomosis in 1895. Although, recently, several papers on the history of facial nerve surgery have been published, little is known about this historically important operation, the theoretical reasoning behind the operation or the surgical perspective in which Ballance developed this method. An original document on the operation, dated in 1895, is not known. The earliest report of the operation is a paper by Ballance, published in 1903. Study of this 1903 paper reveals that Ballance stopped performing the operation after his first attempt in 1895 until he resumed in December 1901. What was the reason for this interruption? Why did Ballance start doing it again in 1901? Between 1895 and Ballance's 1903 paper, several other surgeons had published the results of their facial nerve crossovers. Were they inspired by Ballance's operation from 1895 to do the same or did they invent the method independently? To enhance our knowledge about the early history of facial nerve surgery, the original manuscripts by Ballance and his contemporaries have been studied. Ballance's first facial nerve crossover from 1895 is described in the surgical perspective of the end of the 19th century. The theoretical reasoning for the operation is discussed. It was discovered that Ballance's operation was first recorded in St. Thomas's Hospital Report of 1895, which was published in 1897. However, this report was probably hardly known by Ballance's contemporaries and consequently could not have stimulated them to perform the operation themselves. Jean Louis Faure (1863-1944), from France, appears to have been the first to have performed the operation until Ballance's 1903 paper was published. In 1903, after Ballance's paper had been published, many other accounts of this method were reported in the literature. At that moment facial nerve crossover seems to have been widely regarded as a potential successful technique, a technique which, a century later, is still part of our repertoire.

Cross-facial nerve graft: past and present.

Facial paralysis is a relatively common disorder from which most people recover without complications. However, some are left with significant functional impairment and disfigurement, the treatment of which has challenged physicians for centuries. Within the spectrum of surgical procedures to reanimate the face is cross-facial nerve grafting. This article chronicles the history of cross-facial nerve grafting, including its past and present use, and describes various factors associated with its use. A brief discussion of aetiology and morbidity of facial paralysis and some fundamental surgical options will be presented. A complete review of these topics is beyond the scope of this manuscript.

Basil Kilvington. Unknown pioneer of peripheral nerve repair.

In the early years of the present century, a group of experiments assessing the results of the surgical repair of peripheral nerves and spinal roots was performed by Basil Kilvington. The outcome of the experiments was assessed using both electrophysiological and morphological techniques. Much of Kilvington's work remained unrecognized and was thus repeated at a later date. Kilvington's role in the early history of the surgical repair of nerves appears to have been forgotten and his substantial and prophetic discoveries deserve better recognition.