[Multiple ileal neuroendocrine tumors 10mm in diameter with lymph node metastasis detected on endoscopy:a case report].

A 53-year-old man with an abnormal routine physical examination was referred to our hospital. Colonoscopy showed a 5-mm submucosal tumor that was 7cm proximal to the ileocecal valve. It was identified as a neuroendocrine tumor (NET) on biopsy. Preoperatively, we conducted a double balloon endoscopy to examine the entire small intestine. Another 7-mm submucosal tumor was found on the ileocecal valve, which was missed during the first colonoscopy. A final diagnosis of multiple ileal NETs (<10mm in diameter) was made, and the patient underwent ileocecal resection with lymphadenectomy. Histopathological evaluation of the surgical specimen verified the diagnosis of NET Grade 1 with submucosal invasion. Metastasis to lymph node #202 was also detected. He remained relapse-free for 5 years and 5 months after the operation. In conclusion, this was a case of multiple ileal NETs (<10mm in diameter) with lymph node metastasis that could not be detected preoperatively on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. This case highlights the significance of detailed endoscopic observation of the terminal ileum.

Treatment strategies for borderline resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are a group of rare, heterogeneous tumors that originate in the endocrine tissue of the pancreas and account for 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. The majority of pNETs are non-functional and typically follow a more indolent course. Especially at early stages, the primary management of pNETs is surgical resection which is associated with relatively low rates of recurrence and excellent long-term prognosis. On the other hand, some patients will present with locally advanced primary tumors or low volume metastatic disease in which complete surgical resection may be more difficult to achieve and recurrence rates are significant. Unlike treatment of borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic adenocarcinoma, in which neoadjuvant treatment strategies are becoming standardized, borderline resectability is not a currently established terminology for pNETs and the optimal multidisciplinary treatment approach is poorly understood. METHODS: We performed a literature search on PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov using keywords, including 'pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor' and 'borderline resectable'. All studies and review articles in English with full text were considered. Each publication was independently reviewed. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: We introduce the concept of BR-pNETs, focusing on important criteria that should be included in their definition by balancing the feasibility of resection and the clinical utility of surgery. We suggest that extended resection, involving vascular reconstruction, adjacent organ resection, and/or liver metastasis, should be considered at experienced, high volume centers. Furthermore, we outline multidisciplinary treatment strategies, including systemic and locoregional treatment options, for optimizing outcomes for this growing patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Formalizing the definition of resectability in pNETs through multidisciplinary collaborative research will be important for standardizing the indications for multimodality treatment and aggressive surgical approaches for patients.

111 In-Pentetreotide-Guided Radiosurgery for Intraoperative Localization of Retroperitoneal Nodal Metastasis in a Patient With Ileal Neuroendocrine Tumor.

ABSTRACT: 64 Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT of a 44-year-old man with an ileal neuroendocrine tumor demonstrated the primary tumor, local nodal metastases, and a pericaval nodal metastasis. Localization of the pericaval node during surgery may be difficult, thus 4.4 mCi of 111 In-pentetreotide was administered before surgery to assist with localization and resection. At surgery, the pericaval nodal metastasis was readily detected by gamma probe, which could then be resected and pathologically proven to be a metastasis. This demonstrates the use of somatostatin receptor-targeted imaging for intraoperative localization of an otherwise difficult to surgically localize metastasis. Without intraoperative somatostatin receptor-targeted radiosurgery, disease may have been incompletely resected.

When is neoadjuvant chemotherapy indicated in rectal neuroendocrine tumors? An analysis of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (rNET) are rare and challenging to manage. While most patients with small rNET can be definitively treated with local excision, the role of chemotherapy in general and neoadjuvant therapy particularly in managing advanced rNET has not been well established. Therefore, this study aimed to determine which patients with rNET may gain a survival benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients who underwent surgical resection of rNET in the US National Cancer Database (NCDB) (2004-2019) was performed. First, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of poor overall survival (OS) and define the high-risk groups. Afterward, stratified OS analyses were performed for each high-risk group to assess whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a survival benefit in each group. RESULTS: A total of 1837 patients (49.8% female; mean age 56.6 ± 12.3 years) underwent radical resection of a rNET. Tumors > 20 mm in size, clinical T4 tumors, poorly differentiated tumors, and metastatic disease were independent predictors of worse OS and were defined as high-risk groups. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not have a significant survival benefit in any of the high-risk groups, except for patients with high-grade rNETs where neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved OS to a mean of 30.9 months compared with 15.9 months when neoadjuvant therapy was not given (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved the OS of patients with high-grade rNET by 15 months and may be indicated for this group.

[Therapeutic efficacy analysis of endoscopic combined with serological diagnosis strategy and endoscopic in G1 and G2 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms].

Objective: To investigate the endoscopic combined serological diagnosis strategy for G1 and G2 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (G-NENs), and to evaluate the safety, short-term, and long-term efficacy of two endoscopic treatment procedures: endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 100 consecutive patients with G-NENs who were hospitalized at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2011 to October 2023. These patients underwent endoscopic treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare clinicopathological characteristics, as well as short-term and long-term efficacy of lesions in the EMR group and ESD group before and after treatment. Results: Among the 100 patients with G-NENs, the median age was 54 years old. Before surgery, 29 cases underwent endoscopic combined serological examination, and 24 of them (82.2%) had abnormally elevated plasma chromogranin A. The combined diagnostic strategy for autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AIG) achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 100%(22/22). A total of 235 G-NEN lesions were included, with 84 in the ESD group and 151 in the EMR group. The median size of the lesions in the ESD group (5.0 mm) was significantly larger than that in the EMR group (2.0 mm, P＜0.001). Additionally, the ESD group had significantly more lesions with pathological grade G2[23.8%(20/84) vs. 1.3%(2/151), P＜0.001], infiltration depth reaching the submucosal layer [78.6%(66/84) vs. 51.0%(77/151), P＜0.001], and more T2 stage compared to the EMR group[15.5%(13/84) vs. 0.7%(1/151), P＜0.001]. After PSM, 49 pairs of lesions were successfully matched between the two groups. Following PSM, there were no significant differences in the en bloc resection rate [100.0%(49/49) vs. 100.0%(49/49)], complete resection rate [93.9%(46/49) vs. 100.0%(49/49)], and complication rate [0(0/49) vs. 4.1%(2/49)] between the two groups. During the follow-up period, no recurrence or distant metastasis was observed in any of the lesions in both groups. Conclusions: The combination of endoscopy and serology diagnostic strategy has the potential to enhance the accuracy of diagnosing G1 and G2 stage G-NENs and their background mucosa. Endoscopic resection surgery (EMR, ESD) is a proven and safe treatment approach for G1 and G2 stage G-NENs.

Optimal surgical management of unifocal vs. multifocal NF-PNETs: a respective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) represent 1-2% of pancreatic tumors, with recent guidelines recommending active surveillance for non-functioning PNETs (NF-PNETs) smaller than 2 cm. However, the management of multiple NF-PNETs, as well as the influence of tumor number on prognosis, remains under-researched. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed NF-PNET patients who underwent pancreatic resection at Severance Hospital between February 1993 and August 2023, comparing the characteristics of patients diagnosed with multifocal tumors and those with unifocal tumors. A subgroup analysis of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was performed based on multifocality employing the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Of 187 patients, 169 (90.4%) had unifocal and 18 (9.6%) had multifocal tumors. Multifocal tumors were more likely to be diffusely spread, necessitating more total pancreatectomies (diffuse tumor location: 4.7% in unifocal vs. 38.9% in multifocal cases, p < 0.001; total pancreatectomy: 4.1% in unifocal vs. 33.3% in multifocal cases, p < 0.001). In patients with NF-PNET who underwent the same extent of pancreatic resection, no significant difference in the incidence of complication was observed regardless of multifocality. Moreover, no significant difference in OS was seen between the unifocal and multifocal groups (log-rank test: p = 0.93). However, the multifocal group exhibited a poorer prognosis in terms of RFS compared to the unifocal group (log-rank test: p = 0.004) Hereditary syndrome, tumor grade, size, lymphovascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis were key factors in the recurrence. CONCLUSION: This study's findings suggest that the presence of multiple tumors was associated with poorer recurrence-free survival but did not affect long-term survival following surgery. Given the long-term oncologic outcome and quality of life following surgery, resection of tumors over 2 cm is advisable in patients with multifocal PNETs, while a cautious "wait-and-see" approach for smaller tumors (under 2 cm) can minimize the extent of resection and improve the quality of life. In cases with only small multifocal NF-PNETs (< 2 cm), immediate resection may not be crucial, but the higher recurrence rate than that in solitary NF-PNET necessitates intensified surveillance.

[Acidophil stem cell pituitary neuroendocrine tumors/adenoma: a clinicopathological analysis of five cases].

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of acidophil stem cell pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET)/adenoma. Methods: Five cases of acidophil stem cell PitNET/adenoma were diagnosed between May 2022 and July 2023 at the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. The clinicopathological features of the tumor were analyzed by using histology, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy. The relevant literature was reviewed. Results: There were 1 male and 4 females, aged from 23 to 69 years. Patient 3 was 55 years old at the time of diagnosis and first surgery, and relapsed 5 years later. The patients' median age was 32 years. Patients 1 and 5 showed elevated blood prolactin, with various degrees of hormonal symptoms except Patient 3, who showed only tumor compression symptoms. Imaging studies showed that all cases involved the sellar floor. The tumors of Patients 1, 2 and 5 were closely related to the cavernous sinus segment of the internal carotid artery. The tumors exhibited a diffuse growth pattern with chromophobic to slightly acidophilic cytoplasm. A few of tumor cells showed chromophobic cytoplasm. The nucleoli were conspicuous. Intranuclear inclusion bodies and variably-sized clear vacuoles were observed occasionally. Under electron microscope, marked mitochondrial abnormalities were observed, including increased mitochondria number, expanded hypertrophy, and absence of mitochondrial ridge fracture. Some mitochondrial matrices were dense, while some were vacuolated. Conclusions: Acidophil stem cell PitNET/adenoma is a rare type of pituitary adenomas/PitNETs. It often has a more clinically aggressive manner with immature cells, diffuse expression of PIT1, prolactin, and varying degrees of growth hormone expression. Because of the obvious diversity of their clinical hormone status and hormone immune expression, the diagnosis of this type tumor is still a challenge.

Analysis of 25 surgical cases of thymic neuroendocrine tumors and thymic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of patients who underwent surgical resection for thymic neuroendocrine tumors (TNET) or thymic carcinoma. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics of our surgical patients at Fukuoka University Hospital from January 1995 to December 2018. RESULTS: There were nine cases of TNET and 16 cases of thymic carcinoma. Regarding the pathological type, the TNET group included three atypical carcinoid cases, two large cell neuroendocrine tumor cases, two small cell carcinoma cases, and two other cases. The thymic carcinoma group included 15 squamous carcinoma cases and one case of adenosquamous carcinoma. Based on the Masaoka-Koga staging system, six TNET cases and 11 thymic carcinoma cases were stage III or IV. The complete resection rate was 77% in the TNET group and 81% in the thymic carcinoma group. Additional chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was performed in five cases of TNET and 11 cases of thymic carcinoma. The five-year survival rate and five-year disease-free survival rate were 87.5% and 75.0% in the TNET group and 58.9% and 57.1% in the thymic carcinoma group, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.248 and P = 0.894, respectively). In the univariate analysis, complete resection was a statistically significant prognostic factor (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: In this study, no difference in prognosis was observed between TNET and thymic carcinomas. To understand the characteristics of these tumors, further case accumulation and multicenter clinical studies are needed. (243words).

[Premalignant cystic neoplasms and neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreatic head-Is the Kausch-Whipple resection an adequate treatment?] / Prämaligne, zystische Neoplasien und neuroendokrine Tumoren des Pankreaskopfes ­ Ist die Kausch-Whipple-Resektion eine adäquate Therapie?

Currently, the most frequently used surgical treatment for symptomatic, benign, premalignant cystic and neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreatic head is the Whipple procedure or pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). However, when performed for treatment of benign tumors, PD is a multiorgan resection involving loss of pancreatic and extrapancreatic tissue and functions. PD for benign neoplasm is associated with the risk of considerable early postoperative complications and an in-hospital mortality of up to 5%. Following the Whipple procedure a new onset of diabetes mellitus is observed in 14-20% and new exocrine insufficiency in 25-45%, leading to metabolic dysfunction and impairment of quality of life persisting after resection of benign tumors. Symptomatic neoplasms are indication for surgery. Patients with asymptomatic pancreatic tumors are treated according to the criteria of surveillance protocols. The goal of surgical treatment for asymptomatic patients is, according to the guideline criteria, interruption of the surveillance program before the development of an advanced stage cancer associated with the neoplasm. Tumor enucleation and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection, either total or partial, are parenchyma-sparing resections for benign neoplasms of the pancreatic head. The first choice for small tumors is enucleation; however, enucleation is associated with an increased risk of pancreatic fistula B + C following pancreatic main duct injury. Duodenum-preserving total or partial pancreatic head resection has the advantage of low postoperative surgery-related complications, a mortality of < 0.5% and maintenance of the endocrine and exocrine pancreatic functions. Parenchyma-sparing pancreatic head resections should replace classical Whipple procedures for neoplasms of the pancreatic head.

Surgery for advanced neuroendocrine tumours of the small bowel: recommendations based on a consensus meeting of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES).

BACKGROUND: Small bowel neuroendocrine tumours often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The aim of this paper is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding (controversial) topics in the surgical management of advanced small bowel neuroendocrine tumours. METHODS: A working group of experts was formed by the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons. The group addressed 11 clinically relevant questions regarding surgery for advanced disease, including the benefit of primary tumour resection, the role of cytoreduction, the extent of lymph node clearance, and the management of an unknown primary tumour. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE to identify papers addressing the research questions. Final recommendations were presented and voted upon by European Society of Endocrine Surgeons members at the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons Conference in Mainz in 2023. RESULTS: The literature review yielded 1223 papers, of which 84 were included. There were no randomized controlled trials to address any of the research questions and therefore conclusions were based on the available case series, cohort studies, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses of the available non-randomized studies. The proposed recommendations were scored by 38-51 members and rated 'strongly agree' or 'agree' by 64-96% of participants. CONCLUSION: This paper provides recommendations based on the best available evidence and expert opinion on the surgical management of locally advanced and metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumours.

Prognostic significance of systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with nonfunction pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor undergoing surgical resection.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to investigate the clinical significance and prognostic role of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in patients who underwent surgical resection for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 364 patients with nonfunctioning pNETs. The association between the SII level and clinical parameters was investigated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the optimal SII value. Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic factors. RESULTS: Our study included 364 patients with nonfunctioning pNETs who underwent surgery. The median age was 51.0 (43.0, 59.3), and 164 (45.1%) were male. The optimal threshold of SII determined by ROC analysis was 523.95. Higher SII levels were significantly associated with older age (p = 0.001), sex (p = 0.011), tumor size (p = 0.032), and tumor grade (p = 0.002). Recurrence was observed in 70 (19.2%) patients following a median follow-up of 98 months. Univariate analysis showed that higher SII (p < 0.0001), tumor size >4 cm (p = 0.015), and G2/G3 grade (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariate analysis revealed that higher SII (HR: 7.35; 95% CI: 3.44, 15.70; p < 0.0001) and G2/G3 grade (HR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.42, 6.82; p = 0.005) remained significantly associated with tumor recurrence. Furthermore, 46 (12.6%) patients died during the follow-up. Higher SII (HR: 8.43; 95% CI: 3.19, 22.72; p < 0.0001) and G2/G3 grade (HR: 3.16; 95% CI: 1.01, 9.86; p = 0.048) were independent predictors of overall survival (OS) by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study revealed that a higher SII level was associated with tumor-related features (larger tumor size and advanced grade) and subsequent shorter DFS and OS in patients with nonfunctioning pNETs. These results indicated that the SII could serve as an efficient prognostic biomarker for nonfunctioning pNETs.

The Value of Textbook Outcome in Benchmarking Pancreatoduodenectomy for Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite variable that can define the quality of pancreatic surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate TO after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent PD for NF-PanNETs (2007-2016) in different centers were included in this retrospective study. TO was defined as the absence of severe postoperative complications and mortality, length of hospital stay ≤ 19 days, R0 resection, and at least 12 lymph nodes harvested. RESULTS: Overall, 477 patients were included. The TO rate was 32%. Tumor size [odds ratio (OR) 1.696; p = 0.013], a minimally invasive approach (OR 12.896; p = 0.001), and surgical volume (OR 2.062; p = 0.023) were independent predictors of TO. The annual frequency of PDs increased over time as well as the overall rate of TO. At a median follow-up of 44 months, patients who achieved TO had similar disease-free (p = 0.487) and overall survival (p = 0.433) rates compared with patients who did not achieve TO. TO rate in patients with NF-PanNET > 2 cm was 35% versus 27% in patients with NF-PanNET ≤ 2 cm (p = 0.044). Considering only NF-PanNETs > 2 cm, patients with TO and those without TO had comparable 5-year overall survival rates (p = 0.766) CONCLUSIONS: TO is achieved in one-third of patients after PD for NF-PanNETs and is not associated with a benefit in terms of long-term survival.

Usefulness of Opening the Diaphragma Sellae Before Transecting Interclinoidal Ligament for Endoscopic Endonasal Transoculomotor Triangle Approach: Technical Nuances and Surgical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Opening the oculomotor triangle (OT) and removing the posterior fossa lesion by endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is challenging for even an experienced endoscopic neurosurgeon. We summarize the treatment experience and technical nuances with EEA for resection of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors and cavernous sinus (CS) meningiomas invading through the OT. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2022, 8 patients, comprising 5 with pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (3 with nonfunctioning and 2 with somatotroph tumors with increased levels of growth hormone) and 3 CS meningiomas, were treated using an endoscopic endonasal transoculomotor triangle approach. The critical surgical technique is continuously opening the diaphragma sellae from medial to lateral toward the interclinoidal ligament and transecting it to enlarge the OT. We evaluated preoperative tumor size, previous surgical history, preoperative symptoms, extent of tumor resection, histopathology, and postoperative complications for all patients. RESULTS: The gross total resection (defined as complete removal) in 3 patients (38%), near-total resection (defined as >95% removal) in 4 patients (50%), and subtotal resection (defined as ≤90% removal) in 1 patient (12%) and gross total resection of tumor invading through the OT was achieved in all patients through pure EEA. Two of 3 patients with visual deficits in nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors improved, and the other remained stable postoperatively. One patient showed transient oculomotor nerve palsy. The growth hormone level of the 2 patients with somatotroph tumors declined to normal. For 3 patients with CS meningiomas, cranial nerve palsy improved in 2 patients, whereas the other patient developed increased facial numbness after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic endonasal transoculomotor triangle approach is an efficient surgical option for tumors with CS invasion and OT penetration.

Risk factors for positive resection margins after endoscopic resection for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the incidence of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs) has remarkably increased due to the widespread use of screening gastrointestinal endoscopy. Currently, the most common treatments are surgery and endoscopic resection. Compared to surgery, endoscopic resection possesses a higher risk of resection margin residues for the treatment of GI-NETs. METHODS: A total of 315 patients who underwent surgery or endoscopic resection for GI-NETs were included. We analyzed their resection modality (surgery, ESD, EMR), margin status, Preoperative marking and Prognosis. RESULTS: Among 315 patients included, 175 cases underwent endoscopic resection and 140 cases underwent surgical treatment. A total of 43 (43/175, 24.57%) and 10 (10/140, 7.14%) patients exhibited positive resection margins after endoscopic resection and surgery, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis suggested that no preoperative marking and endoscopic treatment methods were risk factors for resection margin residues. Among the patients with positive margin residues after endoscopic resection, 5 patients underwent the radical surgical resection and 1 patient underwent additional ESD resection. The remaining 37 patients had no recurrence during a median follow-up of 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with surgery, endoscopic therapy has a higher margin residual rate. During endoscopic resection, preoperative marking may reduce the rate of lateral margin residues, and endoscopic submucosal dissection may be preferred than endoscopic mucosal resection. Periodical follow-up may be an alternative method for patients with positive margin residues after endoscopic resection.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour resection in circumportal pancreas: a rare anatomical anomaly with important surgical implications.

Various congenital anomalies of the pancreas have been reported due to its complex embryological development involving the fusion of two separate buds. Circumportal pancreas is a rare anatomical anomaly where the pancreatic head and uncinate process fuse abnormally with the pancreatic body, encasing the portal vein and/or superior mesenteric vein completely. This anomaly poses several challenges to hepatobiliary surgeons, as the encasement of the portal vein by the abnormal pancreatic tissue makes an additional parenchymal transection necessary. Vascular variants have also been reported with circumportal pancreas, which, if not recognised preoperatively, can be catastrophic. Therefore, careful preoperative evaluation and planning are essential, to ensure safe pancreatic resection and recovery in a patient with circumportal pancreas. We present a case of a successful subtotal pancreatectomy and splenectomy in a patient with circumportal pancreas, for a suspected pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma. The aim of this case report is to contribute valuable insights that can aid hepatobiliary surgeons in enhancing their preoperative planning when encountered with patients with similar anatomical variances.

Prediction of disease recurrence in patients after complete pancreatic NET (PanNET) G2 resection.

INTRODUCTION: The number of detected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) has been increasing over the last decades. Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment, but the management is still controversial. This study aimed to compare patients after radical PanNET G2 resection to determine the most important predictive factors for relapse. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with histologically confirmed PanNET G2 who underwent successful surgery between 2006 and 2020 with the intention of radical treatment were enrolled. RESULTS: In total, 44 patients were eligible for the analysis. The average follow-up was 8.39 ± 4.5 years. Disease recurrence was observed in 16 (36.36%) patients. The dominant location of the primary tumour was the tail of the pancreas (43.18%), especially in the subgroup with disease recurrence (56.25%). The smallest tumour diameter associated with the PanNET G2 recurrence was 22 mm. The relationship between the largest dimension of the tumour with a division of < 4 cm vs. > 4 cm and the relapse was close to statistical significance. Recurrence was associated with a larger tumour size (p = 0.018). There was a statistically significant relationship and a weak correlation between Ki-67 (p = 0.036, V Cramer = 0.371) and disease relapse. CONCLUSION: For the group of PanNET G2 patients after radical surgery, the overall risk of recurrence was 36.36%, with the highest rate in the first 5 years after surgery, but in individual cases it occurred significantly later, even 10 years after surgery. The most important predictive factors of the PanNET G2 recurrence was Ki-67 over 5.75% and size of tumour > 4 cm.