Revisiting the NPcis mouse model: A new tool to model plexiform neurofibroma.

Neurofibromatosis Type I (NF1) is a rare genetic disorder. NF1 patients frequently develop a benign tumor in peripheral nerve plexuses called plexiform neurofibroma. In the past two decades, tissue-specific Nf1 knockout mouse models were developed using commercially available tissue-specific Cre recombinase and the Nf1 flox mice to mimic neurofibroma development. However, these models develop para-spinal neurofibroma, recapitulating a rare type of neurofibroma found in NF1 patients. The NPcis mouse model developed a malignant version of neurofibroma called malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) within 3 to 6 months but intriguingly without apparent benign precursor lesion. Here, we revisited the NPcis model and discovered that about 20% display clinical signs similar to Nf1 tissue-specific knockout mice models. However, a systematic histological analysis could not explain the clinical signs we observed although we noticed lesions reminiscent of a neurofibroma in a peripheral nerve, a cutaneous neurofibroma, and para-spinal neurofibroma on rare occasions in NPcis mice. We also observed that 10% of the mice developed a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) spontaneously, coinciding with their earring tag identification. Strikingly, half of the sciatic nerves from NPcis mice developed plexiform neurofibroma within 1-6 months when intentionally injured. Thus, we provided a procedure to turn the widely used NPcis sarcoma model into a model recapitulating plexiform neurofibroma.

Selumetinib for children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibromas: A plain language summary of SPRINT.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This summary describes a publication about a study called SPRINT. The SPRINT study included 50 children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and plexiform neurofibroma (PN) that could not be removed with surgery. PNs are tumors that grow along nerves and can cause various problems for children, such as pain, changes to appearance, and muscle weakness. In SPRINT, the study team wanted to learn whether a medication called selumetinib was able to shrink the PN caused by NF1 (also known as NF1-related PN), and if shrinking PNs helped relieve children of the problems caused by it. To assess how selumetinib might help, children had scans to measure the size of their PN, completed questionnaires, and had a variety of other tests done by their doctor. Their caregivers also completed questionnaires about their child. The children took selumetinib capsules twice a day on an empty stomach. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: The results showed that selumetinib was able to shrink the PN for most children (68%). The results also showed that the problems caused by the children's PNs mostly improved while on selumetinib treatment. SPRINT also showed that the side effects of selumetinib were mainly mild and could be managed by doctors. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: Before SPRINT, there were not many treatment options for children with NF1 and PN as there were no medications that had been shown to shrink PN, and surgery was not always possible. SPRINT showed that this medication shrinks most PNs and could help children with NF1 and PN. In April 2020, selumetinib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) because of the results of SPRINT. Selumetinib was the first and, as of February 2024, is the only medicine that can be prescribed by doctors to help children with NF1-related PN. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01362803 (SPRINT) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Intraparotid plexiform neurofibroma: A rare diagnostic challenge.

Isolated intraparotid neurofibromas are exceptionally rare and often associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Diagnosing these tumors proves challenging because of the clinical resemblance to primary salivary gland masses. This case report details an 18-year-old with a painful, enlarging parotid mass, diagnosed through fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) revealing myxoid stroma and spindle cells. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a plexiform neurofibroma involving the parotid gland and facial nerve. Histopathology validated the diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of cytological and radiological correlation. Notably, the absent NF1 association makes this case unique. Surgical excision with facial nerve reconstruction was performed, highlighting the complexity of managing such rare intraparotid neurofibromas. Awareness of this entity is crucial for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.

A Population Pharmacokinetic Assessment of the Effect of Food on Selumetinib in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Related Plexiform Neurofibromas and Healthy Volunteers.

Selumetinib is clinically used for pediatric patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and symptomatic, inoperable plexiform neurofibromas. Until recently, selumetinib had to be taken twice daily, after 2 hours of fasting and followed by 1 hour of fasting, which could be inconvenient. This population analysis evaluated the effect of low- and high-fat meals on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of selumetinib and its active metabolite N-desmethyl selumetinib. The dataset comprised 511 subjects from 15 clinical trials who received ≥1 dose of selumetinib and provided ≥1 measurable postdose concentration of selumetinib and N-desmethyl selumetinib. A 2-compartment model with sequential 0- and 1st-order delayed absorption and 1st-order elimination adequately described selumetinib PK characteristics. A 1-compartment model reasonably described N-desmethyl selumetinib PK characteristics over time simultaneously with selumetinib. Selumetinib geometric mean area under the concentration-time curve ratio (1-sided 90% confidence interval [CI] lower bound) was 76.9% (73.3%) with a low-fat meal and 79.3% (76.3%) with a high-fat meal versus fasting. The lower bound of the 1-sided 90% CI demonstrated a difference of <30% between fed and fasted states. Considering the flat exposure-response relationship within the dose range (20-30 mg/m2), the observed range of exposure, and the variability in the SPRINT trial, this was not considered clinically relevant.

Efficacy and safety of selumetinib in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and inoperable plexiform neurofibromas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The approval of selumetinib in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1(NF1) and inoperable plexiform neurofibromas (PN) has reshaped the landscape of clinical management of the disease, and further comprehensive evaluation of the drug's efficacy and safety is needed. METHODS: Original articles reporting on the efficacy and safety of elumetinib in patients with NF1 were comprehensively searched in the Pubmed database, Embase database, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database and screened for inclusion of studies that met the criteria. We pooled the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), disease progression rate (DPR), and the rate of improvement in PN-related complications using meta-analysis. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was also statistically analyzed. RESULTS: This study included 10 clinical trials involving 268 patients. The pooled ORR was 68.0% (95% CI 58.0-77.3%), the DCR was 96.8% (95% CI 90.8-99.7%) and the DPR was only 1.4% (95% CI 0-4.3%). The pooled improvement rate was 75.3% (95% CI 56.2-90.9%) for pain and 77.8% (95% CI 63.1-92.5%) for motor disorders. Most adverse events were mild, with the most common being gastrointestinal reactions (diarrhea: 62.5%; vomiting: 54.5%). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that selumetinib is effective in patients with NF1 and PN, significantly improving the serious complications associated with PN as well as having tolerable toxicities. Our findings help to increase clinicians' confidence in applying selumetinib and promote the clinical adoption and benefit of the new drug.

The PlexiQoL, a patient-reported outcome measure on quality of life in neurofibromatosis type 1-associated plexiform neurofibroma: translation, cultural adaptation and validation into the Dutch language for the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Half of the patients with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) develop one or more tumours called plexiform neurofibromas, which can have a significant impact on Quality of Life (QoL). The PlexiQoL questionnaire is a disease-specific QoL measure for adults with NF1-associated plexiform neurofibromas. The aim of this study was to adapt and validate a Dutch version of the PlexiQoL for the Netherlands. METHODS: The PlexiQoL was translated using the dual-panel methodology, followed by cognitive debriefing interviews to assess face and content validity. The psychometric properties were evaluated by administering the questionnaire on two separate occasions to a sample of adults with NF1 and plexiform neurofibromas. Feasibility was evaluated by the presence of floor/ceiling effects. Reliability was assessed by evaluating Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest reliability, using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to check for known group validity. The Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaire was used as comparator questionnaire to evaluate convergent validity. RESULTS: The translation and cognitive debriefing interviews resulted in a Dutch version of the PlexiQoL that reflected the original concept and underlying semantic meanings of the UK English version. Forty participants completed the validation survey. The Dutch PlexiQoL demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.825) and test-retest reliability (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.928). The questionnaire detected differences in PlexiQoL scores between participants based on self-reported general health and disease severity. Convergent validity was confirmed for relevant NHP subsections. CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch PlexiQoL demonstrated excellent psychometric properties and can be reliably used to measure plexiform neurofibroma-related QoL in adults with NF1 in the Netherlands.

C5aR plus MEK inhibition durably targets the tumor milieu and reveals tumor cell phagocytosis.

Plexiform neurofibromas (PNFs) are nerve tumors caused by loss of NF1 and dysregulation of RAS-MAPK signaling in Schwann cells. Most PNFs shrink in response to MEK inhibition, but targets with increased and durable effects are needed. We identified the anaphylatoxin C5a as increased in PNFs and expressed largely by PNF m acrophages. We defined pharmacokinetic and immunomodulatory properties of a C5aR1/2 antagonist and tested if peptide antagonists augment the effects of MEK inhibition. MEK inhibition recruited C5AR1 to the macrophage surface; short-term inhibition of C5aR elevated macrophage apoptosis and Schwann cell death, without affecting MEK-induced tumor shrinkage. PNF macrophages lacking C5aR1 increased the engulfment of dying Schwann cells, allowing their visualization. Halting combination therapy resulted in altered T-cell distribution, elevated Iba1+ and CD169+ immunoreactivity, and profoundly altered cytokine expression, but not sustained trumor shrinkage. Thus, C5aRA inhibition independently induces macrophage cell death and causes sustained and durable effects on the PNF microenvironment.

Cutaneous toxicities of mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors in children and young adults with neurofibromatosis-1.

PURPOSE: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant disorder which commonly causes neoplasms leading to disfigurement or dysfunction. Mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors (MEKi) are generally well-tolerated treatments which target neural tumor progression in patients with NF1. However, cutaneous adverse events (CAEs) are common and may hinder patients' abilities to remain on treatment, particularly in children. We aim to characterize CAEs secondary to MEKi treatment in pediatric and young adult patients with NF1. METHODS: We reviewed institutional medical records of patients under 30 years with a diagnosis of "NF1," "NF2," or "other neurofibromatoses" on MEKi therapy between January 1, 2019 and June 1, 2022. We recorded the time-to-onset, type, and distribution of CAEs, non-cutaneous adverse events (AEs), AE management, and tumor response. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 40 patients with NF1 (median age, 14 years). Tumor types included low-grade gliomas (51%) and plexiform neurofibromas (38%). MEKi used included selumetinib (69%), trametinib (25%), and mirdametinib (6%). A total of 74 CAEs occurred, with 28 cases of acneiform rash (38%). Other common CAEs were paronychia, seborrheic dermatitis, eczema, xerosis, and oral mucositis. The most common treatments included oral antibiotics and topical corticosteroids. Most patients had clinical (stable or improved) tumor response (71%) while 29% had tumor progression while on a MEKi. There was no significant association between CAE presence and tumor response (p = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in characterization of MEKi toxicities and their management is important to develop treatment guidelines for pediatric and young adult patients with NF1 on MEKi therapy.

Perceived transition readiness among adolescents and young adults with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibromas: a cross-sectional descriptive study.

OBJECTIVES: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a genetic cancer predisposition syndrome that can impact multiple organ systems and is associated with plexiform neurofibroma tumors, requiring care from birth through adulthood. Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with NF1 face several barriers to transition from pediatric to adult care. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess transition readiness in this population and to evaluate relationships between specific NF1 symptoms and transition readiness. METHODS: AYAs (aged 16-24) enrolled in existing studies related to NF1 were eligible. AYAs and their parents completed measures of transition readiness (Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire version 4 [TRAQ-4]), and AYAs also completed a transition readiness interview (UNC TRxANSITION). RESULTS: Thirty-eight AYAs (mean age = 19.95 ± 2.68 years) participated in the study. Average TRAQ scores indicated that AYAs were still learning Self-Management skills (M = 3.37, SD = 1.08) and Self-Advocacy skills (M = 3.98, SD = 0.67). Older AYAs had higher TRAQ scores for Self-Management (r = 0.70, p < .001) and Self-Advocacy (r = 0.41, p = .011) than younger AYAs. Parents and AYAs had similar TRAQ scores. About one third of AYAs (37.8%, n = 14) expressed uncertainty about how NF1 might affect them in the future. The remaining AYAs mostly expressed concerns regarding tumor growth, pain, or cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study, preliminary findings suggest that AYAs with NF1 express confidence in many areas of transition readiness but continue to require support, particularly with Self-Management skills. Given the gaps in understanding of future health risks, AYAs with NF1 would benefit from early assessment, psychoeducation, and support for transition readiness to adult care.

Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs among patients diagnosed with neurofibromatosis type 1 with and without plexiform neurofibromas in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to retrospectively investigate the patient characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and healthcare costs related to management of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) in Japan. METHODS: Cohorts of NF1 patients with or without plexiform neurofibromas (PN) were identified from the Medical Data Vision database in 2008-2019. Baseline characteristics, NF1 medications, HCRU, and associated costs were assessed using descriptive statistics. All-cause HCRU and costs following the first confirmed NF1 diagnosis date were analyzed per patient per year (PPPY) in Japanese Yen (JPY) and United States Dollar (USD). RESULTS: A total of 4394 NF1 patients without PN and 370 NF1 patients with PN were identified. The mean age was 35.0 and 36.9 years, respectively. The proportion of patients with PN treated with medications was higher than that in patients without PN (except for antirheumatic/immunologic agents). Analgesics/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most frequently prescribed NF1 medications (44.3% and 56.0% in patients without and with PN, respectively), followed by inpatient prescriptions of opioids/opioid-like agents (17.8% and 27.6%, respectively). Inpatient admissions accounted for the highest costs in both cohorts with the average cost PPPY being JPY 2,133,277 (USD 19,861) for patients without PN and JPY 1,052,868 (USD 9802) for patients with PN. CONCLUSIONS: NF1 is treated primarily with supportive care with analgesics/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the most frequently prescribed NF1 medications in Japan. Findings underscored the unmet need and substantial economic burden among patients with NF1 and highlighted the need for new treatment options for patients with this disease.

Schwann cell derived pleiotrophin stimulates fibroblast for proliferation and excessive collagen deposition in plexiform neurofibroma.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 associated plexiform neurofibroma (pNF) is characterized by abundant fibroblasts and dense collagen, yet the intricate interactions between tumor-origin cells (Schwann cells) and neurofibroma-associated fibroblasts (NFAFs) remain elusive. Employing single-cell RNA sequencing on human pNF samples, we generated a comprehensive transcriptomics dataset and conducted cell-cell communication analysis to unravel the molecular dynamics between Schwann cells and NFAFs. Our focus centered on the pleiotrophin (PTN)/nucleolin (NCL) axis as a pivotal ligand-receptor pair orchestrating this interaction. Validation of PTN involvement was affirmed through coculture models and recombinant protein experiments. Functional and mechanistic investigations, employing assays such as CCK8, EdU, Western Blot, ELISA, Hydroxyproline Assay, and Human phospho-kinase array, provided critical insights. We employed siRNA or inhibitors to intercept the PTN/NCL/proline-rich Akt substrate of 40 kDa (PRAS40) axis, validating the associated molecular mechanism. Our analysis highlighted a subset of Schwann cells closely linked to collagen deposition, underscoring their significance in pNF development. The PTN/NCL axis emerged as a key mediator of the Schwann cell-NFAF interaction. Furthermore, our study demonstrated that elevated PTN levels enhanced NFAF proliferation and collagen synthesis, either independently or synergistically with TGF-ß1 in vitro. Activation of the downstream molecule PRAS40 was noted in NFAFs upon PTN treatment. Crucially, by targeting NCL and PRAS40, we successfully reversed collagen synthesis within NFAFs. In conclusion, our findings unveil the pivotal role of the PTN/NCL/PRAS40 axis in driving pNF development by promoting NFAFs proliferation and function. Targeting this pathway emerges as a potential therapeutic strategy for pNF. This study contributes novel insights into the molecular mechanisms governing pNF pathogenesis.

Treatment With Selumetinib for Café-au-Lait Macules and Plexiform Neurofibroma in Pediatric Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

This case report describes 4 patients with a rare autosomal dominant multisystem disorder resulting from NF1 variants that leads to café-au-lait macules and neurofibromas.

Giant gluteal and vesical plexiform neurofibromas in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a neurocutaneous genetic disorder caused by mutations in the NF1 gene, resulting in the formation of benign tumors called neurofibromas. The most common type of tumor seen in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 is the slow-growing and benign neurofibroma, with a subtype called plexiform neurofibroma being particularly common and causing pain, functional impairment, and cosmetic disfigurement. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 20-year-old North African female patient with a history of neurofibromatosis type 1 who presented with a growing mass in her right gluteal region, which was later diagnosed as a giant cutaneous neurofibroma. Imaging studies revealed infiltration in several regions, including the urinary bladder wall, resulting in significant bilateral hydronephrosis. The patient is currently being monitored, and no excisional procedures are planned. CONCLUSIONS: Neurofibromatosis type 1 can cause a variety of clinical symptoms, including the development of large plexiform neurofibromas. It is important to closely monitor patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 for the early detection of neurofibromas. Early detection and prompt surgical intervention are essential for preventing complications.

Distinct Transcriptional Profiles in the Different Phenotypes of Neurofibroma from the Same Subject with Neurofibromatosis 1.

Neurofibromatosis 1 is a prevalent hereditary neurocutaneous disorder. Among the clinical phenotypes of neurofibromatosis 1, cutaneous neurofibroma (cNF) and plexiform neurofibroma (pNF) have distinct clinical manifestations, and pNF should be closely monitored owing to its malignant potential. However, the detailed distinct features of neurofibromatosis 1 phenotypes remain unknown. To determine whether the transcriptional features and microenvironment of cNF and pNF differ, single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on isolated cNF and pNF cells from the same patient. Six cNF and five pNF specimens from different subjects were also immunohistochemically analyzed. Our findings revealed that cNF and pNF had distinct transcriptional profiles even within the same subject. pNF is enriched in Schwann cells with characteristics similar to those of their malignant counterpart, fibroblasts, with a cancer-associated fibroblast-like phenotype, angiogenic endothelial cells, and M2-like macrophages, whereas cNF is enriched in CD8 T cells with tissue residency markers. The results of immunohistochemical analyses performed on different subjects agreed with those of single-cell RNA sequencing. This study found that cNF and pNF, the different neurofibromatosis phenotypes in neurofibromatosis 1, from the same subject are transcriptionally distinct in terms of the cell types involved, including T cells.

Neurofibromatosis type 1-associated plexiform neurofibromas of the neck: topography of lesions and surgical treatment data of 69 patients.

PURPOSE: Plexiform neurofibromas (PNF) are rare tumors arising from peripheral nerve sheath cells. PNF are a hallmark in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), a tumor predisposition syndrome. PNF often grow invasively and destructively, what may complicate surgical treatment. Data on frequency, location, and surgical procedures of patients with NF1-associated FPNF are scarce. This study provides treatment data of NF1 patients. METHODS: Localization and treatment data of 69 NF1 patients with neck PNF were analyzed. Frequency of lesions was recorded in coded colors on schematic neck drawings. RESULTS: The tumors showed no side preference, were located in the entire area under investigation, and did not respect anatomical units/dermatomes. However, the sternocleidomastoid region was particularly frequently affected. The mean number of surgical measures per patient was 1.33. Complications were extensive swelling, hematoma, and bleeding. Histological assessment usually confirmed the clinical assessment of neoplasm. However, histologic differentiation of PNST reveals differences in between tumors that have been unified in clinical assessment as PNF. CONCLUSION: The color-coded, schematic overview of the frequency distribution of surgical neck interventions in NF1 patients with PNF proved a useful tool to gain assessment of preferred treatment needs. The imaging procedure may be suitable for controlling the external aspect of natural tumor development (growth, effects of aging) in the same way as the documentation of the post-surgical course. Treatment plans for patients with these tumors should consider that repeated interventions may be necessary to achieve a longer-term stable result.

Genotype-phenotype correlations of neurofibromatosis type 1: a cross-sectional study from a large Chinese cohort.

BACKGROUND: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a highly heterogeneous autosomal genetic disorder characterized by a broad spectrum of clinical and molecular manifestations. The correlations between genotype and phenotype in NF1 remain elusive. This study aimed to elucidate genotype-phenotype associations in a large Chinese cohort of NF1 patients. METHODS: We included NF1 patients from our center who underwent genetic testing for NF1 variants and systemic examination. Genotype-phenotype correlation analyses were performed, focusing on variation types and involved neurofibromin domains. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were enrolled, comprising 105 males and 90 females, with a median age of 18 years. Truncating variants, single amino acid variations, and splicing variants accounted for 139/195 (71.3%), 23/195 (11.8%), and 33/195 (16.9%), respectively. Patients with splicing variants exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of spinal plexiform neurofibromas (spinal PNF) than those with truncating variants (76.4% vs. 51.8%; p = 0.022). Variations affecting the PKC domain were associated with higher rates of cutaneous neurofibromas (CNF) (100% vs. 64.9%, p < 0.001), Lisch nodules (100% vs. 61.2%, p < 0.001), plexiform neurofibromas (PNF) (100% vs. 95.7%, p = 0.009), and psychiatric disorders (11.8% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.042). Patients with mutations in the CSRD had an elevated risk of secondary primary malignancies (11.6% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.015). GRD involvement might enhance the risk of Lisch nodules (76.9% vs. 53.7%, p = 0.044). Variations in the Sec14-PH domain were correlated with a higher rate of CNF (76.8% vs. 58.6%, p = 0.014). Additionally, we found that the p.R1748* variants carry a high risk of malignancy. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested some novel genotype-phenotype correlations within a Chinese cohort, providing innovative insights into this complex field that may contribute to genetic counseling, risk stratification, and clinical management for the NF1 population.

Development and pilot validation of a novel disfigurement severity scale for plexiform neurofibromas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We developed an observer disfigurement severity scale for neurofibroma-related plexiform neurofibromas to assess change in plexiform neurofibroma-related disfigurement and evaluated its feasibility, reliability, and validity. METHODS: Twenty-eight raters, divided into four cohorts based on neurofibromatosis type 1 familiarity and clinical experience, were shown photographs of children in a clinical trial (NCT01362803) at baseline and 1 year on selumetinib treatment for plexiform neurofibromas (n = 20) and of untreated participants with plexiform neurofibromas (n = 4). Raters, blinded to treatment and timepoint, completed the 0-10 disfigurement severity score for plexiform neurofibroma on each image (0 = not at all disfigured, 10 = very disfigured). Raters evaluated the ease of completing the scale, and a subset repeated the procedure to assess intra-rater reliability. RESULTS: Mean baseline disfigurement severity score for plexiform neurofibroma ratings were similar for the selumetinib group (6.23) and controls (6.38). Mean paired differences between pre- and on-treatment ratings was -1.01 (less disfigurement) in the selumetinib group and 0.09 in the control (p = 0.005). For the disfigurement severity score for plexiform neurofibroma ratings, there was moderate-to-substantial agreement within rater cohorts (weighted kappa range = 0.46-0.66) and agreement between scores of the same raters at repeat sessions (p > 0.05). In the selumetinib group, change in disfigurement severity score for plexiform neurofibroma ratings was moderately correlated with change in plexiform neurofibroma volume with treatment (r = 0.60). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that our observer-rated disfigurement severity score for plexiform neurofibroma was feasible, reliable, and documented improvement in disfigurement in participants with plexiform neurofibroma shrinkage. Prospective studies in larger samples are needed to validate this scale further.

Association of plexiform and diffuse neurofibromas with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in NF I patients: a whole-body MRI assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients with whole-body MRI (WBMRI) to investigate the frequency of plexiform neurofibromas (pNFs), diffuse neurofibromas (dNFs), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, between the years 2015 and 2023, 83 consecutive patients with known NF1 underwent a total of 110 WBMRI screenings for MPNST using a standardized institutional protocol. The lesions are categorized as discrete lesions, pNFs, dNFs, and MPNSTs. Histopathology served as the reference standard for all MPNSTs. RESULTS: Among the 83 patients analyzed, 53 (64%) were women and 30 were men (36%) of ages 36.94±14.43 years (range, 15-66 years). Of the 83 patients, 33 have a positive family history of NF1 and positive genetic studies. Seven of 83 (8%) have only dNF, 20/83 (24%) have pNF, 28/83 (34%) have both dNF and pNF, and 28/83 (34%) have neither. Of the 83 patients, eight (9.6%) were diagnosed with nine total MPNSTs. Age range for patients with MPNSTs at time of diagnosis was 22-51, with an average age of 33.4 years. Only one MPNST (11%) developed from underlying pNF 4 years after WBMRI along the right bronchial tree. Three of eight (37.5%) patients with MPNST died within 5 years of pathologic diagnosis. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the absence of a predisposition for development of MPNST from pNFs and dNFs in the setting of NF1. As such, these lesions may not need special surveillance compared to discrete peripheral nerve sheath tumors.