Aripiprazole-induced quasi-neuroleptic malignant syndrome: two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Significant elevation of creatine kinase levels (above three digits) and leucocytosis in the absence of muscle rigidity, tremors, or autonomic dysfunction can pose a real challenge in the context of antipsychotic treatment as an early herald of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION: We present here two cases of adult male patients of Black British heritage, ages 51 years and 28 years, respectively. Both received a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder and presented with massive increase of creatine kinase blood level after aripiprazole depot administration, one with pernicious increase associated with silent neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and the second with asymptomatic benign enzyme elevation. CONCLUSION: Though aripiprazole use is less likely to cause neuroleptic malignant syndrome, on rare occasions it can produce massive symptomatic or asymptomatic increase in serum creatine kinase enzyme levels, raising the need for close monitoring, especially at the initial doses of the drug.

Atypical neuroleptic malignant syndrome in an incarcerated patient: a demographic who may be at increased risk.

An incarcerated male patient with a psychiatric history of schizoaffective disorder presented to the emergency department with muscle rigidity and mutism after receiving a 150 mg haloperidol decanoate injection. At the peak of his illness, symptoms included muscular rigidity, mutism, excessive drooling, an altered level of consciousness, tachycardia, diaphoresis and tremors. Atypical neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) was diagnosed after discrediting similar illnesses through clinical reasoning, laboratory and imaging studies. He was successfully treated during a 40-day hospitalisation with lorazepam, amantadine, methocarbamol and supportive care. This case represents an atypical presentation of NMS due to the patient's lack of fever development. Nonetheless, he satisfied many other criteria, most notably rapid symptom onset after receiving a first-generation antipsychotic medication. The case also provides an opportunity to discuss the prevalence of psychiatric illness among the US incarcerated population and incarceration as a risk factor for developing NMS.

A Case of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome in the Context of Lithium Toxicity and Aripiprazole Use.

OBJECTIVE: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare life-threatening condition that providers should be cognizant of when prescribing dopamine-receptor antagonists. Atypical antipsychotic agents were initially considered to have a lower risk of inducing the development of NMS compared with conventional antipsychotic. Considerable evidence, however, has suggested that atypical antipsychotics are associated with NMS, including the partial dopamine agonist, aripiprazole. There is growing evidence that other psychotropics, including lithium, cause this condition. Here, the authors present a case of a patient who developed NMS from lithium and aripiprazole and provide a literature review of reported NMS cases with either psychotropic. METHOD AND RESULTS: The authors report the case of 60-year-old male patient who developed NMS over a hospital course during which both aripiprazole and lithium were prescribed. In addition, a literature review was performed and a summary of cases of NMS induced by either lithium and/or aripiprazole is provided. CONCLUSIONS: This case adds to the growing body of literature of aripiprazole and lithium-induced NMS. Only 2 other cases are reported where concomitant aripiprazole and lithium use lead to NMS. Interestingly, our patient did develop lithium toxicity during hospitalization, but the NMS diagnosis occurred after lithium toxicity resolved. This varies from the other 2 cases where NMS developed despite lithium levels always being therapeutic. Unfortunately, there are more questions than answers surrounding this rare complication involving these 2 psychotropics and clinical vigilance is warranted when using these psychotropics especially in cases where aripiprazole and lithium are used in combination.

When the fever will not stop, stop the pills! A case report.

BACKGROUND: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a neurologic emergency potentially fatal. This rare side effect is most commonly associated with first-generation antipsychotics and less frequently with atypical or second-generation antipsychotics. The diagnosis relies on both clinical and laboratory criteria, with other organic and psychiatric conditions being ruled out. CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old female patient, who is institutionalized and completely dependent, has a medical history of recurrent urinary infections and colonization by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Her regular medication regimen included sertraline, valproic acid, quetiapine, risperidone, lorazepam, diazepam, haloperidol, baclofen, and fentanyl. The patient began experiencing dyspnea. Upon physical examination, she exhibited hypotension and a diminished vesicular murmur at the right base during pulmonary auscultation. Initially, after hospitalization, she developed high febrile peaks associated with hemodynamic instability, prompting the initiation of antibiotic treatment. Despite this, her fever persisted without an increase in blood inflammatory parameters, and she developed purulent sputum, necessitating antibiotherapy escalation. The seventh day of hospitalization showed no improvement in symptoms, suggesting NNMS as a differential diagnosis. All antipsychotic and sedative drugs, as well as antibiotherapy, were discontinued, after which the patient showed significant clinical improvement. CONCLUSION: Antipsychotic agents are commonly employed to manage behavioral changes linked to various disorders. However, their severe side effects necessitate a high degree of vigilance, the cessation of all medications, and the implementation of supportive care measures. A prompt and accurate diagnosis of NMS is crucial to alleviating the severe, prolonged morbidity and potential mortality associated with this syndrome.

Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome in Patients With Dementia: Experiences of A Single Memory Clinic.

OBJECTIVES: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a life-threatening condition that occurs as an adverse reaction to antipsychotic and antiemetic agents or sudden withdrawal of dopaminergic medications. Given the metabolic and functional reserves and the comorbidities in older adults, NMS may show an atypical course. METHODS: The medical records of patients with neurodegenerative diseases leading to dementia between 2013 and 2020 were reviewed for the diagnosis of NMS. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were obtained from the records of laboratory parameters, management, and length of stay. RESULTS: Fifteen older adults (19 episodes) diagnosed with NMS were included. The median age was 76 years, and 5 were female. Ten of 15 NMS patients were atypical. Most of them had an infection accompanying NMS. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome was caused by antidopaminergic agents (5 antipsychotics, 1 metoclopramide) in 6 episodes and discontinuation of a dopaminergic agent, l -DOPA, in 12 episodes. In 1 patient, it was associated with simultaneous use of domperidone and amantadine withdrawal. Rigidity in NMS due to l -DOPA discontinuation was higher than in those due to antipsychotic use ( P = 0.027). Two of our patients needed intensive care, and 1 died. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the high frequency of atypical NMS and the importance of early recognition of this potentially fatal syndrome, which can accompany neurodegenerative diseases and infections in older adults.

The role of antipsychotics and other drugs on the development and progression of neuroleptic malignant syndrome.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare but serious and sometimes fatal complication in patients taking antipsychotic drugs, and its underlying mechanism still remains unclear. The pharmacotherapy for psychotic disorders is complicated and often involves a combination of two or more drugs, including drugs other than antipsychotics. In the present study, we used the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database to broadly investigate the drugs associated with NMS, following their related pathways, as well as the drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in NMS. All analyses were performed using data from the JADER database from April 2004 to May 2022. Single-drug signals were evaluated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and drug pathways were investigated using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). DDIs were evaluated using the Ω shrinkage measure and Chi-square statistics models. All drugs associated with 20 or more NMS cases in the JADER database exhibited signals for NMS, including non-antipsychotics. Pathways associated with the drugs included the dopaminergic or serotonergic synapses related to antipsychotics. DDIs leading to NMS were confirmed for several drug combinations exhibiting single-drug signals. This study confirmed the significant association of various drugs, including non-psychotics, with NMS and suggested that various pathways related to these drugs may be involved in the progression of NMS. In addition, several combinations of these drugs were found to interact (DDI), increasing the risk of NMS, which suggests that appropriate caution should be taken when administering these drugs.

Delayed-Onset olanzapine-induced rhabdomyolysis.

Olanzapine is a commonly used and effective second-generation antipsychotic agent used for the control of paranoia and agitation in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder as well as in the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. Serious side effects of treatment are uncommon but spontaneous rhabdomyolysis represents a rare complication. We describe here a patient treated with a stable dose of olanzapine for more than 8 years who developed acute severe rhabdomyolysis without an identifiable trigger and without features suggestive of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. The rhabdomyolysis was atypical in its delayed onset and severity with a creatine kinase level of 345 125 U/L, the highest level reported in the available literature. We also describe the clinical manifestations of delayed-onset olanzapine-induced rhabdomyolysis and its differentiation from neuroleptic malignancy syndrome, and we highlight key aspects of management to prevent or minimise further complications such as acute kidney injury.

The management challenges of a case with Flupentixol-induced neuroleptic malignant syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare and life-threatening reaction. The incidence rate of NMS has dropped because of the higher use of atypical antipsychotics, compared with the typical ones. The mortality rate in patients taking injectable antipsychotics has been also by 38%. AIM: Here, a case developing the NMS symptoms following Flupentixol (FPX) use was reported. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 46-year-old man with the history of schizoaffective disorder (SAD) and recently on six-weekly doses of long-acting (LA) typical antipsychotic drugs. He was referred with a fever, sweating, a food intolerance, mutism, and disorientation in 2019. He was presented with generalized rigidity, negativism, and neck stiffness. The patient's initial creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level was 1476 IU/L, which gradually elevated to 3997 IU/L on Day 26. NMS was further diagnosed, in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria, and the score 9+ in the Naranjo Algorithm as the adverse drug reaction probability scale. Afterward, the patient was treated with bromocriptine at a dose of 5 mg 3 times a day, which progressively reached a maximum of 50 mg. He experienced sepsis and resistant respiratory infection several times. The case was finally discharged after 66 days of hospitalization, with a high level of consciousness, but limited verbal communication, in a fever-free condition with the oral administration of bromocriptine and lorazepam. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, there were suggestions for the management challenges of NMS in patients receiving LA injectable antipsychotic agents.

There is more to this fever than meets the eye: A case of neuroleptic malignant-like syndrome (NMLS) secondary to withdrawal of procyclidine and L-dopa on a background of long-standing flupenthixol depot use.

This case report highlights the risk of development of Neuroleptic Malignant-Like Syndrome secondary to withdrawal of procyclidine with brief withdrawal of L-dopa and long-term typical antipsychotic depot. The patient responded to reintroduction of procyclidine, sedation and supportive treatment. The mechanism and management of NMS and NMLS is also reviewed. This case emphasises that any changes in antipsychotic and antiparkinsonian medications should be undertaken with extreme caution and patient should be closely monitored for development of NMLS after alteration in these medications.

Antipsychotics for schizophrenia spectrum disorders with catatonic symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Whilst antipsychotics are the mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, there have been numerous attempts to identify biomarkers that can predict treatment response. One potential marker may be psychomotor abnormalities, including catatonic symptoms. Early studies suggested that catatonic symptoms predict poor treatment response, whilst anecdotal reports of rare adverse events have been invoked against antipsychotics. The efficacy and safety of antipsychotics in the treatment of this subtype of schizophrenia have rarely been studied in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of any single antipsychotic medication with another antipsychotic or with other pharmacological agents, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), other non-pharmacological neuromodulation therapies (e.g. transcranial magnetic stimulation), or placebo for treating positive, negative, and catatonic symptoms in people who have schizophrenia spectrum disorders with catatonic symptoms. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials, which is based on CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, the ISRCTN registry, and WHO ICTRP, on 19 September 2021. There were no language, date, document type, or publication status limitations for inclusion of records in the register. We also manually searched reference lists from the included studies, and contacted study authors when relevant. SELECTION CRITERIA: All RCTs comparing any single antipsychotic medication with another antipsychotic or with other pharmacological agents, ECT, other non-pharmacological neuromodulation therapies, or placebo for people who have schizophrenia spectrum disorders with catatonic symptoms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: two review authors independently inspected citations, selected studies, extracted data, and appraised study quality. For binary outcomes, we planned to calculate risk ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous outcomes, we planned to calculate mean differences between groups and their 95% CI. We assessed risk of bias for the included studies, and created a summary of findings table; however, we did not assess the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach because there was no quantitative evidence in the included study. MAIN RESULTS: Out of 53 identified reports, one RCT including 14 hospitalised adults with schizophrenia and catatonic symptoms met the inclusion criteria of the review. The study, which was conducted in India and lasted only three weeks, compared risperidone with ECT in people who did not respond to an initial lorazepam trial.   There were no usable data reported on the primary efficacy outcomes of clinically important changes in positive, negative, or catatonic symptoms. Whilst both study groups improved in catatonia scores on the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), the ECT group showed significantly greater improvement at week 3 endpoint (mean +/- estimated standard deviation; 0.68 +/- 4.58; N = 8) than the risperidone group (6.04 +/- 4.58; N = 6; P = 0.035 of a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures originally conducted in the trial). Similarly, both groups improved on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores by week 3, but ECT showed significantly greater improvement in positive symptoms scores compared with risperidone (P = 0.04). However, data on BFCRS scores in the ECT group appeared to be skewed, and mean PANSS scores were not reported, thereby precluding further analyses of both BFCRS and PANSS data according to the protocol.  Although no cases of neuroleptic malignant syndrome were reported, extrapyramidal symptoms as a primary safety outcome were reported in three cases in the risperidone group. Conversely, headache (N = 6), memory loss (N = 4), and a prolonged seizure were reported in people receiving ECT. These adverse effects, which were assessed as specific for antipsychotics and ECT, respectively, were the only adverse effects reported in the study. However, the exact number of participants with adverse events was not clearly reported in both groups, precluding further analysis.  Our results were based only on a single study with a very small sample size, short duration of treatment, unclear or high risk of bias due to unclear randomisation methods, possible imbalance in baseline characteristics, skewed data, and selective reporting. Data on outcomes of general functioning, global state, quality of life, and service use, as well as data on specific phenomenology and duration of catatonic symptoms, were not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found only one small, short-term trial suggesting that risperidone may improve catatonic and positive symptoms scale scores amongst people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and catatonic symptoms, but that ECT may result in greater improvement in the first three weeks of treatment. Due to small sample size, methodological shortcomings and brief duration of the study, as well as risk of bias, the evidence from this review is of very low quality. We are uncertain if these are true effects, limiting any conclusions that can be drawn from the evidence. No cases of neuroleptic malignant syndrome were reported, but we cannot rule out the risk of this or other rare adverse events in larger population samples.  High-quality trials continue to be necessary to differentiate treatments for people with symptoms of catatonia in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The lack of consensus on the psychopathology of catatonia remains a barrier to defining treatments for people with schizophrenia. Better understanding of the efficacy and safety of antipsychotics may clarify treatment for this unique subtype of schizophrenia.

ANTECEDENTES: Aunque los antipsicóticos son la base del tratamiento de los trastornos del espectro de la esquizofrenia, ha habido numerosos intentos de identificar biomarcadores que puedan predecir la respuesta al tratamiento. Un posible marcador podrían ser las anomalías psicomotoras, incluidos los síntomas catatónicos. Los estudios más antiguos indican que los síntomas catatónicos predicen una respuesta deficiente al tratamiento, mientras que se han alegado informes anecdóticos de eventos adversos poco frecuentes contra los antipsicóticos. La eficacia y la seguridad de los antipsicóticos en el tratamiento de este subtipo de esquizofrenia rara vez se han estudiado en ensayos controlados aleatorizados (ECA). OBJETIVOS: Comparar los efectos de cualquier fármaco antipsicótico único con otro antipsicótico o con otros agentes farmacológicos, terapia electroconvulsiva (TEC), otras terapias de neuromodulación no farmacológicas (p. ej., estimulación magnética transcraneal) o placebo para el tratamiento de los síntomas positivos, negativos y catatónicos en personas que presentan trastornos del espectro de la esquizofrenia con síntomas catatónicos. MÉTODOS DE BÚSQUEDA: El 19 de septiembre de 2021 se realizaron búsquedas en el registro de ensayos basados en estudios del Grupo Cochrane de Esquizofrenia (Cochrane Schizophrenia Group), que se basa en CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, el registro ISRCTN y la ICTRP de la OMS. No hubo limitaciones de idioma, fecha, tipo de documento o estado de publicación para la inclusión de los registros en el registro. También se realizaron búsquedas manuales en las listas de referencias de los estudios incluidos y se estableció contacto con los autores de los estudios cuando fue pertinente. CRITERIOS DE SELECCIÓN: Todos los ECA que compararan cualquier fármaco antipsicótico único con otro antipsicótico o con otros agentes farmacológicos, TEC, otras terapias de neuromodulación no farmacológicas o placebo en personas que presentan trastornos del espectro de la esquizofrenia con síntomas catatónicos. OBTENCIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LOS DATOS: Dos autores de la revisión inspeccionaron de forma independiente las citas, seleccionaron los estudios, extrajeron los datos y evaluaron la calidad de los estudios. Para los desenlaces binarios se planeó calcular las razones de riesgos y sus intervalos de confianza (IC) del 95% sobre la base de la intención de tratar. Para los desenlaces continuos se planeó calcular las diferencias de medias entre los grupos y sus IC del 95%. Se evaluó el riesgo de sesgo de los estudios incluidos y se creó una tabla de resumen de los hallazgos. Sin embargo, no se evaluó la certeza de la evidencia mediante el método GRADE porque no hubo evidencia cuantitativa en el estudio incluido. RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES: De los 53 informes identificados, un ECA que incluyó a 14 adultos hospitalizados con esquizofrenia y síntomas catatónicos cumplió con los criterios de inclusión de la revisión. El estudio, realizado en la India y que sólo duró tres semanas, comparó la risperidona con la TEC en personas que no respondieron a una prueba inicial con lorazepam. No se informaron datos utilizables sobre los desenlaces principales de eficacia de cambios clínicamente importantes en los síntomas positivos, negativos o catatónicos. Aunque ambos grupos del estudio mejoraron en las puntuaciones de catatonia en la Bush­Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), el grupo de TEC mostró una mejoría significativamente mayor en el desenlace a las tres semanas (media +/­ desviación estándar estimada; 0,68 +/­ 4,58; n = 8) que el grupo de risperidona (6,04 +/­ 4,58; n = 6; p = 0,035 de un análisis de varianza (ANOVA) de dos vías para medidas repetidas realizado originalmente en el ensayo). Asimismo, ambos grupos mejoraron en las puntuaciones de la Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) a las tres semanas, pero la TEC mostró una mejoría significativamente mayor en las puntuaciones de los síntomas positivos en comparación con la risperidona (p = 0,04). Sin embargo, los datos sobre las puntuaciones de la BFCRS en el grupo de TEC parecieron estar sesgados, y no se informaron las puntuaciones medias de la PANSS, lo que impidió realizar más análisis de los datos de la BFCRS y la PANSS según el protocolo. Aunque no se informaron casos de síndrome neuroléptico maligno, en tres casos del grupo de risperidona se notificaron síntomas extrapiramidales como un desenlace principal de seguridad. Por el contrario, en las personas que recibieron TEC se informó cefalea (n = 6), pérdida de memoria (n = 4) y una convulsión prolongada. Estos efectos adversos, que se evaluaron como específicos de los antipsicóticos y de la TEC, respectivamente, fueron los únicos efectos adversos notificados en el estudio. Sin embargo, el número exacto de participantes con eventos adversos no se informó claramente en ambos grupos, lo que impidió realizar un análisis más profundo. Los resultados de esta revisión se basaron en un solo estudio con un tamaño muestral muy pequeño, una duración corta del tratamiento, un riesgo de sesgo incierto o alto debido a métodos de asignación al azar poco claros, un posible desequilibrio en las características iniciales, datos sesgados y un informe selectivo. No se informaron datos sobre los desenlaces de funcionalidad general, estado global, calidad de vida ni uso de los servicios, así como tampoco datos sobre la fenomenología específica ni la duración de los síntomas catatónicos. CONCLUSIONES DE LOS AUTORES: Solo se encontró un ensayo pequeño, a corto plazo, que indica que la risperidona podría mejorar las puntuaciones de la escala de síntomas catatónicos y positivos entre las personas con trastornos del espectro de la esquizofrenia y síntomas catatónicos, pero que la TEC podría producir una mayor mejoría en las primeras tres semanas de tratamiento. Debido al pequeño tamaño muestral, las deficiencias metodológicas y la breve duración del estudio, así como el riesgo de sesgo, la evidencia de esta revisión es de calidad muy baja. No hay confianza en que estos efectos sean verdaderos, lo que limita cualquier conclusión que se pueda sacar a partir de la evidencia. No se notificaron casos de síndrome neuroléptico maligno, pero no se puede descartar el riesgo de este u otros eventos adversos poco frecuentes en muestras poblacionales más grandes. Aún se necesitan ensayos de calidad alta para diferenciar los tratamientos en las personas con síntomas de catatonia en los trastornos del espectro de la esquizofrenia. La falta de consenso sobre la psicopatología de la catatonia todavía es un obstáculo para definir los tratamientos para las personas con esquizofrenia. Un mejor conocimiento de la eficacia y la seguridad de los antipsicóticos podría aclarar el tratamiento de este subtipo único de esquizofrenia.

Concomitant neuroleptic malignant syndrome and diabetes insipidus.

ABSTRACT: Each year, nearly one-fifth of adults in the United States are prescribed at least one psychotropic medication. An increased trend in psychiatric polypharmacy has heightened awareness of drug-drug interactions and the tracking of adverse drug reactions. This article describes a patient who developed concomitant neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus during cross-titration of his antipsychotics while on lithium. The patient's mild form of NMS in turn caused hypovolemia and acute kidney injury. This case study highlights the dangers of polypharmacy and how it can obscure the presentation of even classic adverse reactions.

A Severe Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome Treated with Daily Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Case Report. / Günlük Elektrokonvülzif Terapi ile Tedavi Edilen Siddetli Nöroleptik Malign Sendrom: Bir Olgu Sunumu.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare but life-threatening condition caused by dopamine modulating medications, particularly antipsychotics. First-line treatments of neuroleptic malignant syndrome are supportive care, discontinuation of the offending agent and pharmacotherapy. In drug-resistant and severe situations, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is recommended as well. In this paper we present a 23-year old male with bipolar disorder who was treated with multiple injections of zuclopenthixol long acting and depot forms for a recent manic episode and developed NMS. The patient was transferred to an intensive care unit, medical management was initiated including benzodiazepines, bromocriptine and dantrolene. Due to the inadequate response after several days, ECT (bitemporal electrode placement, briefpulse, on a daily basis) was initiated. After 17 sessions, NMS relieved and there was no need for maintenance ECT. The patient is under follow-up care for 3 years with no cognitive and physical sequela. Keywords: Electroconvulsive therapy, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, bipolar disorder.

Síndrome neuroléptico maligno en paciente postoperada: a propósito de un caso / Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a postoperative patient: a case report

El síndrome neuroléptico maligno es una emergencia médica poco frecuente asociada al uso de antipsicóticos y otros fármacos antidopaminérgicos. No se dispone de una prueba específica para su diagnóstico, basándose este en una alta sospecha clínica y la realización de un buen diagnóstico diferencial. Un cuadro clínico compatible, destacando la hipertermia, rigidez muscular, alteración del nivel de conciencia y signos de rabdomiolisis en los estudios analíticos, junto con el antecedente de la toma de fármacos neurolépticos, constituyen los elementos clave para la detección de esta entidad. Debido a su escasa incidencia y su potencial mortalidad, es primordial su conocimiento a través de series de casos descritos en la literatura para facilitar su sospecha diagnóstica ante un caso clínico compatible. A continuación, exponemos un caso de una paciente de 79 años con consumo crónico de alcohol como único antecedente de interés, que recibió una dosis única de haloperidol tras un cuadro de delirio en el contexto de un postoperatorio convencional de traumatología. Posteriormente, desarrolló un cuadro de deterioro progresivo del nivel de conciencia, diaforesis, rigidez muscular generalizada, hipertermia, junto a acidosis metabólica severa, hiperlactacidemia, rabdomiolisis, hipertransaminasemia e hipocalcemia. Tras excluir otras entidades compatibles con la clínica, el síndrome neuroléptico maligno se postuló como la principal hipótesis diagnóstica, reforzándose el diagnóstico tras la mejoría clínica y analítica evidente posterior al inicio del tratamiento con dantrolene. La paciente pudo, finalmente, ser dada de alta escasos días después del inicio del cuadro sin presentar secuelas.(AU)

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome is a rare medical emergency associated with the use of antipsychotics and other antidopaminergic drugs. There is no specific test, and diagnosis is based on high clinical suspicion and good differential diagnosis.A clinical picture consistent with hyperthermia, muscle rigidity, altered level of consciousness, together with signs of rhabdomyolysis in analytical studies and a history of taking neuroleptic drugs are the key elements in the detection of this entity.Due to its low incidence and potential mortality, it is essential to publish case reports of neuroleptic malignant syndrome in order to raise awareness of this entity and facilitate diagnostic suspicion when encountering a patient with compatible symptoms.The following is the case of a 79 year old patient with chronic alcohol consumption as the only history of interest, who was given a single dose of haloperidol after an episode of delirium in the postoperative period of conventional trauma surgery. She subsequently developed a picture of progressive deterioration of the level of consciousness, diaphoresis, generalized muscle rigidity, hyperthermia, together with severe metabolic acidosis, hyperlacticaemia, rhabdomyolysis, hypertransaminasemia and hypocalcemia. After ruling out other entities compatible with the clinical picture, neuroleptic malignant syndrome was given as the main diagnostic hypothesis. Diagnosis was confirmed after clinical and analytical improvement following treatment with dantrolene. The patient was discharged from hospital with no sequelae a few days after onset of the condition.(AU)

[Early recognition of antipsychotic malignant syndrome: prevention from worse in young people with dementia]. / Maligne antipsychoticasyndroom vroegtijdig herkennen.

Antipsychotic malignant syndrome (AMS) sometimes is difficult to recognize. Four young persons with dementia developing AMS are presented. We emphasize that there may be signs to consider this diagnosis and how to distinguish between serotonergic syndrome and delirium. Other patients using antipsychotics may also show subtle signs related to AMS. Risk factors are: organic brain syndrome, delirium and agitation. Safe antipsychotics are non-existing and while the presentation of this syndrome can be diverse, we recommend to determine creatine kinase helping to diagnose AMS in patients showing unexplained complaints of pain, posture abnormalities or swallowing problems. Preventing by using non-drug interventions is of course the best option. Furthermore an experienced care-team can contribute to the timely recognition of AMS. We advise to avoid antipsychotics in patients who have already had a AMS, and if unavoidable, to monitor closely for side effects and creatinine kinase.

Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome with Normal Creatine Phosphokinase Levels: An Atypical Presentation.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) was initially notified as an adverse effect of an antipsychotic agent called chlorpromazine, in 1956. In the past, several case reports of NMS have been reported, even if they did not meet the proposed diagnostic criteria for it. The diagnostic criteria for NMS include increased muscle stiffness, increased body temperature, elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels by at least four times the upper limit of normal (ULN), autonomic dysfunction, and an altered mental status. We present a case of a 25-year gentleman with schizophrenia, who arrived in the Emergency Department, with significant behavioural changes for a month, accompanied by drowsiness and high-grade fever for two weeks. CPK levels done on two occasions were 669 U/L and 710 U/L, respectively. Persistent hyperthermia and autonomic symptoms with further deterioration in mental status, led to a working diagnosis of NMS. The patient, thereafter, received bromocriptine, benzodiazepines and continuous intravenous hydration, but his clinical condition deteriorated and he expired after nine days of hospital stay. Key Words: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome, Creatine phosphokinase, Hyperthermia, Muscle stiffness.

Atypical Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: Case Reports and Diagnostic Challenges.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome caused by atypical antipsychotic drugs may present in an atypical manner without symptoms such as hyperthermia and/or muscle rigidity. A detailed description of atypical neuroleptic malignant syndrome induced by atypical antipsychotic drugs, practical information to distinguish neuroleptic malignant syndrome from other related conditions, and the diagnostic criteria that may be used to settle the diagnosis of atypical neuroleptic malignant syndrome are highlighted in this paper. This study was conducted searching PubMed and Science Direct, resulting in 525 articles. 26 case reports that met inclusion criteria were identified. Atypical neuroleptic malignant syndrome was found to develop mainly in male patients suffering from schizophrenia (14 cases) and bipolar disorder (2), and was induced by clozapine (6 cases), olanzapine (5 cases), aripiprazole and quetiapine (4 cases). Muscle rigidity did not develop in patients treated with clozapine and quetiapine, whereas a lack of hyperthermia was common with aripiprazole and clozapine treatment. Atypical neuroleptic malignant syndrome is a difficult matter, especially when symptoms of hyperthermia or muscle rigidity is lacking, but using Levenson's or Adityanjee and Aderibigbe's criteria may increase it detectability, can permit earlier intervention and prevent development of life-threatening typical neuroleptic malignant syndrome.

Clozapine Withdrawal-Induced Malignant Catatonia or Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: A Case Report and a Brief Review of the Literature.

ABSTRACT: In our brief literature review, we discuss the changes in the concept of catatonia as well as its various types and symptoms. We also succinctly review the possible symptoms of clozapine withdrawal. In addition, we analyze the main features of the very few published cases of clozapine withdrawal-induced catatonia and the relationship between neuroleptic malignant syndrome and the malignant subtype of catatonia. Furthermore, we present the case of a 29-year-old male patient with schizophrenia in whom a malignant catatonic episode/neuroleptic malignant syndrome (with negativism, stupor, mutism, autonomic signs [eg, fever, hyperhidrosis], and elevated creatine kinase levels) began 5 days after the patient decided arbitrarily to cease his clozapine treatment. His catatonic symptoms quickly (ie, within a few days) resolved after the reinstitution of clozapine. Finally, we attempt to provide a theoretical explanation for the surprising finding in the literature that the withdrawal of clozapine, unlike the withdrawal of any other antipsychotics, may be associated with catatonia (frequently its malignant subtype). The take-home message of our case is that clinicians should bear in mind the risk of catatonia (especially the malignant subtype of it) after the prompt withdrawal of clozapine therapy.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome with abnormally elevated cardiac troponin I: a case report.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a life-threatening neurological emergency that is primarily characterized by altered consciousness, hyperpyrexia, muscular rigidity, and autonomic instability. Here, we describe a unique case of NMS. A 54-year-old woman with major depressive disorder (MDD) was admitted to our hospital to relieve painful emotions; her laboratory tests and physical examinations were unremarkable. Her medication regime was as follows: day 1, quetiapine (200 mg), clonazepam (2 mg), and zopiclone (7.5 mg); day 2, olanzapine (5 mg) and sertraline (100 mg); day 3, olanzapine (15 mg), sertraline (100 mg), zopiclone (7.5 mg), and clonazepam (2 mg); day 4, olanzapine (15 mg) and haloperidol (5 mg); and day 5, sertraline (50 mg) and olanzapine (5 mg). The patient then developed NMS, and a series of tests showed further abnormalities. Unusually, her cardiac troponin I (TNI) was abnormally elevated as her NMS symptoms worsened, but gradually decreased after she was transferred to the cardiology department for treatment. The increased TNI was suspected to be related to the NMS. Here, we provide several potential explanations for the relationship between TNI and NMS. Based on the present case, it may be important to measure and monitor TNI concentrations in NMS patients.

Reconsidering Rigidity in the Diagnosis of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: A Case Report.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare but potentially fatal syndrome classically encountered in patients receiving typical antipsychotic agents. However, many physicians have also reported the occurrence of NMS with atypical antipsychotics, notably with atypical presentations. In this report, we present a case in which a patient's antipsychotic regimen during a psychotic episode (which involved both typical and atypical antipsychotics) subsequently led to NMS. During his stay, the patient developed an altered level of consciousness, elevation of creatine phosphokinase, hemodynamic instability, and a fever. However, the patient did not have signs of rigidity, the cardinal sign of this syndrome. The authors concluded that patients could develop NMS without rigidity while receiving an antipsychotic. Given this presentation, the authors suggest that clinicians have a high level of suspicion for NMS to avoid misdiagnosis and subsequent adverse consequences. Hence, clinicians must be vigilant about atypical presentations of NMS without rigidity.