Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neurosci Nurs ; 49(4): 247-250, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28661949

ABSTRACT

This article describes the provision of stroke services in Greece and addresses the possible effects of the hospital rotation system. Unique to Greece is a centrally administered rotation system for hospital 24-hour on-call systems in the major cities. This means that a hospital may admit new patients only during specific 24-hour periods every 3 to 5 days. All Greek city hospitals must conform to this rotation basis for emergency and scheduled admissions. Patients with stroke arrive to designated rotation on-call hospital via ambulance or taxi or by private means and are first seen in the accident and emergency department where they are given priority attention accordingly and allocated to a neurology ward, medical ward, or stroke bay if the hospital has one. Occasionally, a neurosurgical consultation is sought; the patient may be admitted directly to a neurosurgery ward. Some attempts have been made to reach a degree of specialization in stroke bays, but with only a few of these, situated only in major cities, the vast majority of patients are still admitted to neurology or medical wards. Nurses and physicians in Greece continue to strive to improve outcomes for their patients with stroke despite adverse circumstances.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/methods , Neurology/organization & administration , Neuroscience Nursing/standards , Stroke/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Greece , Hospitalization , Humans , Neurology/economics , Neurology/methods , Neuroscience Nursing/economics , Neuroscience Nursing/education , Patient Admission , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/mortality , Workforce
2.
J Neurosci Nurs ; 49(3): 169-173, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28471925

ABSTRACT

The neuroscience intermediate unit is a 23-bed unit that was initially staffed with a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:4 to 1:5. In time, the unit's capacity to care for the exceeding number of progressively acute patients fell short of the desired goals in the staff affecting the nurse satisfaction. The clinical nurses desired a lower nurse-patient ratio. The purpose of this project was to justify a staffing increase through a return on investment and increased quality metrics. METHODS: This initiative used mixed methodology to determine the ideal staffing for a neuroscience intermediate unit. The quantitative section focused on a review of the acuity of the patients. The qualitative section was based on descriptive interviews with University Healthcare Consortium nurse managers from similar units. DESIGN: The study reviewed the acuity of 9,832 patient days to determine the accurate acuity of neuroscience intermediate unit patients. Nurse managers at 12 University Healthcare Consortium hospitals and 8 units at the Medical University of South Carolina were contacted to compare staffing levels. DISCUSSION: The increase in nurse staffing contributed to an increase in many quality metrics. There were an 80% decrease in controllable nurse turnover and a 75% reduction in falls with injury after the lowered nurse-patient ratio. These 2 metrics established a return on investment for the staffing increase. In addition, the staffing satisfaction question on the Press Ganey employee engagement survey increased from 2.44 in 2013 to 3.72 in 2015 in response to the advocacy of the bedside nurses.


Subject(s)
Neuroscience Nursing/standards , Neurosciences , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Clinical Competence , Hospitals, University , Job Satisfaction , Neuroscience Nursing/economics , Nurse Specialists , Nursing Staff, Hospital/economics , Quality of Health Care , Severity of Illness Index , South Carolina
3.
J Nurs Adm ; 46(12): 648-653, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27851706

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that nurses would benefit from the fellowship model traditionally used to engage physicians in clinical research. The Neuroscience Nursing Research Center (NNRC) fellowship program was created as a model for engaging nurses at all levels of clinical practice to become active in clinical research. BACKGROUND: The NNRC was established in 2013 as a novel approach to promote bedside nurses as primary investigators in clinical research. METHODS: The NNRC developed 4 pathways to nursing research success: research fellowship, student-nurse internship, didactic training, and research consultation. RESULTS: Fellows have enrolled more than 900 participants in 14 studies. Nurses have presented more than 20 abstracts at 12 conferences and submitted 11 manuscripts for publication. The NNRC has provided research training to more than 150 nurses. CONCLUSIONS: The NNRC program is successful in engaging nurses in research. It shows promise to continue to develop nursing research that is applicable to clinicians and thus improve patient care.


Subject(s)
Clinical Nursing Research/education , Neuroscience Nursing/education , Clinical Nursing Research/economics , Clinical Nursing Research/methods , Fellowships and Scholarships , Humans , Mentors , Neuroscience Nursing/economics , Neuroscience Nursing/methods , Research Support as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...