NTRK Gene Fusion Detection in Atypical Spitz Tumors.

Atypical Spitz tumors (AST) deviate from stereotypical Spitz nevi for one or more atypical features and are now regarded as an intermediate category of melanocytic tumors with uncertain malignant potential. Activating NTRK1/NTRK3 fusions elicit oncogenic events in Spitz lesions and are targetable with kinase inhibitors. However, their prevalence among ASTs and the optimal approach for their detection is yet to be determined. A series of 180 ASTs were screened with pan-TRK immunohistochemistry and the presence of NTRK fusions was confirmed using FISH, two different RNA-based NGS panels for solid tumors, and a specific real time RT-PCR panel. Overall, 26 ASTs showed pan-TRK immunostaining. NTRK1 fusions were detected in 15 of these cases showing cytoplasmic immunoreaction, whereas NTRK3 was detected in one case showing nuclear immunoreaction. Molecular tests resulted all positive in only two ASTs (included the NTRK3 translocated), RNA-based NGS and real time RT-PCR were both positive in three cases, and FISH and real time RT-PCR in another two cases. In seven ASTs NTRK1 fusions were detected only by FISH and in two cases only by real time RT-PCR. The frequency of NTRK fusions in ASTs is 9%, with a clear prevalence of NTRK1 compared to NTRK3 alterations. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry is an excellent screening test. Confirmation of NTRK fusions may require the use of different molecular techniques.

Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma Immunostaining in a Series of Melanocytic Neoplasms.

ABSTRACT: In their 2018 article, Lezcano et al [AJSP 2018(11):1456] show that diffuse tumor cell nuclear reactivity for Preferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) is a feature of melanoma and that benign and atypical melanocytic tumors are PRAME negative or show only focal positivity for PRAME. We report our observations of PRAME staining in 253 melanocytic tumors. Tumors were classified by hematoxylin and eosin sections. The nuclear PRAME staining of neoplastic melanocytes in each case was categorized as absent, focally present, or diffusely present. The results were compared with those of Lezcano et al 105 of 134 (78%) melanocytic nevi were completely PRAME negative. Of the 29 PRAME-positive benign lesions, 28 exhibited focal but not diffuse positivity, including atypical (n = 11) and dysplastic nevi (n = 11). One of 11 Spitz nevi showed diffuse positivity (9%). Thirty-nine of 51 (76%) invasive melanomas, 41 of 50 (82%) melanoma in situ, and 15 of 18 (83%) metastatic melanomas were diffusely PRAME positive. Excluding desmoplastic melanomas, 39 of 49 (80%) primary melanomas were diffusely PRAME positive. Our findings of PRAME staining in melanocytic neoplasia are in general agreement with those of Lezcano et al. Diffuse PRAME reactivity in neoplastic melanocytes is a feature of malignancy and was only otherwise seen in 1 Spitz nevus. Caution is advised in interpretation of PRAME reactivity in melanocytic tumors of uncertain classification because melanoma arising in association with nevus and some atypical melanocytic tumors may show focal or incomplete PRAME staining. Routine histopathological findings, clinical information, PRAME staining, and judicious application of molecular studies are steps leading to accurate classification of melanocytic neoplasia.

Genetic analysis of multiple primary melanomas arising within the boundaries of congenital nevi depigmentosa.

Here, we present a rare case of a patient who developed multiple primary melanomas within the boundaries of two nevi depigmentosa. The melanomas were excised, and as a preventive measure, the remainder of the nevi depigmentosa were removed. We performed whole-exome sequencing on excised tissue from the nevus depigmentosus, adjacent normal skin, and saliva to explain this intriguing phenomenon. We also performed a GeneTrails Comprehensive Solid Tumor Panel analysis on one of the melanoma tissues. Genetic analysis revealed germline MC1R V92M and TYR R402Q polymorphisms and a MET E168D germline mutation that may have increased the risk of melanoma development. This genetic predisposition, combined with a patient-reported history of substantial sun exposure and sunburns, which were more severe within the boundaries of the nevi depigmentosa due to the lack of photoprotective melanin, produced numerous somatic mutations in the melanocytes of the nevi depigmentosa. Fitting with this paradigm for melanoma development in chronically sun-damaged skin, the patient's melanomas harbored somatic mutations in CDKN2A (splice site), NF1, and ATRX and had a tumor mutation burden in the 90-95th percentile for melanoma.

Multiple desmoplastic Spitz nevi with BRAF fusions in a patient with ring chromosome 7 syndrome.

Patients with non-supernumerary ring chromosome 7 syndrome have an increased incidence of hemangiomas, café-au-lait spots, and melanocytic nevi. The mechanism for the increased incidence of these benign neoplasms is unknown. We present the case of a 22-year-old man with ring chromosome 7 and multiple melanocytic nevi. Two nevi, one on the right ear and the other on the right knee, were biopsied and diagnosed as desmoplastic Spitz nevi. Upon targeted next-generation DNA sequencing, both harbored BRAF fusions. Copy number alterations and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for BRAF suggested that the fusions arose on the ring chromosome 7. Hence, one reason for increased numbers of nevi in patients with non-supernumerary ring chromosome 7 syndrome may be increased likelihood of BRAF fusions, due to the instability of the ring chromosome.

BAP1-inactivated melanocytic tumor with preserved BAP1 expression? Morphology to the rescue!

BAP1-inactivated melanocytic tumors typically present with distinctive histopathological changes and loss of nuclear BAP1 protein expression. Rare cases exhibit the typical morphology but with preserved expression of BAP1. In the current issue of Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, Linos et al. describe such a case and provide a comprehensive molecular-genetic exploration to explain such a phenomenon.

Spitz melanoma is a distinct subset of spitzoid melanoma.

Melanomas that have histopathologic features that overlap with those of Spitz nevus are referred to as spitzoid melanomas. However, the diagnostic concept is used inconsistently and genomic analyses suggest it is a heterogeneous category. Spitz tumors, the spectrum of melanocytic neoplasms extending from Spitz nevi to their malignant counterpart Spitz melanoma, are defined in the 2018 WHO classification of skin tumors by the presence of specific genetic alterations, such as kinase fusions or HRAS mutations. It is unclear what fraction of "spitzoid melanomas" defined solely by their histopathologic features belong to the category of Spitz melanoma or to other melanoma subtypes. We assembled a cohort of 25 spitzoid melanomas diagnosed at a single institution over an 8-year period and performed high-coverage DNA sequencing of 480 cancer related genes. Transcriptome wide RNA sequencing was performed for select cases. Only nine cases (36%) had genetic alterations characteristic of Spitz melanoma, including HRAS mutation or fusion involving BRAF, ALK, NTRK1, or MAP3K8. The remaining cases were divided into those with an MAPK activating mutation and those without an MAPK activating mutation. Both Spitz melanoma and spitzoid melanomas in which an MAPK-activating mutation could not be identified tended to occur in younger patients on skin with little solar elastosis, infrequently harbored TERT promoter mutations, and had a lower burden of pathogenic mutations than spitzoid melanomas with non-Spitz MAPK-activating mutations. The MAPK-activating mutations identified affected non-V600 residues of BRAF as well as NRAS, MAP2K1/2, NF1, and KIT, while BRAF V600 mutations, the most common mutations in melanomas of the WHO low-CSD category, were entirely absent. While the "spitzoid melanomas" comprising our cohort were enriched for bona fide Spitz melanomas, the majority of melanomas fell outside of the genetically defined category of Spitz melanomas, indicating that histomorphology is an unreliable predictor of Spitz lineage.

Utility of p16-Ki-67-HMB45 score in sorting benign from malignant Spitz tumors.

When Spitz nevi have increased vertical thickness (>1.0 mm), show ulceration and deep seated mitoses, the differential diagnostic considerations of atypical Spitz tumor (AST) or a Spitzoid melanoma (SM) enter into consideration. While molecular genetic testing could be employed in the work up of atypical melanocytic proliferations, they are expensive and not available at all institutions. Recently, one study employed the combination of p16, Ki-67 and HMB45 (PKH) immunohistochemistry on adult melanomas and proposed a combination of the three markers with scoring of their result to support a diagnosis of melanoma. We report the utility of this antibody combination scoring in discriminating SM and AST in children. We retrospectively reviewed 30 Spitzoid lesions (7 SM, 9 AST and 14 Spitz nevi) from children. Slides from H&E staining and Immunohistochemistry for p16, Ki-67 and HMB45 were reviewed for all cases. The extent of immunohistochemical expression in the lesional cells was scored following published criteria as follows: p16 scored as 0, 1, 2, 3; Ki-67 scored as 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and HMB45 scored as 0, 1 and 2. Thus, the total PKH score for the combination of the 3 antibodies for any case could vary from 0 to 9. The result of the immunohistochemical analysis of cases in our study revealed that the PKH score of Spitz nevus and AST was below 4 for each of the case and that of SM was >4 for each of the case. These results are significant as the previously published study found that the PKH score of equal/or >4 correlated with melanoma and less <4 correlated with benign nevi. Independently, the immunostains could be misleading as Ki-67 labeling index tended to be higher in young children (<2 years of age) and HMB45 was occasionally negative in both AST and SM, and p16 could be completely lost in AST. Our study replicates the findings of the published study of adult melanomas and nevi that showed a total PKH score of equal/or>4 is seen in melanoma. Although, the number of SM cases in our study are few, the PKH scoring pattern of malignant and benign cases was congruent with the adult study. We suggest routine use of PKH immunohistochemistry in the work up of atypical Spitzoid lesions in children.

The morphologic spectrum of germline-mutated BAP1-inactivated melanocytic tumors includes lesions with conventional nevic melanocytes: A case report and review of literature.

Germline mutations in BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) are associated with several neoplasms, including BAP1-inactivated melanocytic tumors (BIMTs). BIMTs are classically described as biphenotypic melanocytic proliferations with BAP1-deficient large epithelioid and rhabdoid melanocytes showing various degrees of cytologic atypia. This morphology has been traditionally classified as "spitzoid" despite the various differences between these lesions and the more classic Spitz nevi. Herein, we report a case of an otherwise healthy 11-year-old female patient with a family history of several malignancies who presented with multiple pink to brown papules. Histologic and immunohistochemical evaluation identified three lesions with loss of nuclear BAP1 staining. The histologic spectrum of these lesions included junctional spitzoid cells within a triphenotypic proliferation and a separate lesion composed entirely of dermal small to medium-sized epithelioid melanocytes with maturation. BAP1 gene sequencing revealed a germline frameshift pathogenic BAP1 mutation, denoted c.1717delC. This case provides further evidence that not all BIMTs conform to classic morphological criteria and that the morphologic spectrum includes lesions resembling conventional nevi. As BIMTs can serve as an early marker of the BAP1 hereditary tumor predisposition syndrome, we believe a need exists for a more comprehensive combined clinical and pathological approach for BIMT identification.

Observational Study Examining the Diagnostic Practice of Ki67 Staining for Melanocytic Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Dermatopathologists routinely use Ki67 immunostaining to assess atypical melanocytic lesions with a dermal component to determine whether an ambiguous tumor is melanoma. However, there is no universal standard of use for Ki67 in melanocytic neoplasms. We sought to observe the real-world use of Ki67 in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions and establish a best practice recommendation. METHODS: We searched dermatopathology reports from 2 academic practices for melanocytic lesions in which Ki67 staining was used for diagnosis. The proliferation rate was compared between cases diagnosed as benign (not requiring re-excision), moderate to severely dysplastic or atypical Spitz nevi (requiring re-excision), and malignant melanoma. The use of other melanocytic markers and consensus review was also recorded and compared between institutions. RESULTS: Pathology reports for 106 cases were reviewed. A high Ki67 proliferation rate (n = 18) favored a diagnosis of melanoma or nevi requiring re-excision (15/18, 83.3%) versus a benign nevus (3/18, 16.67%). A high Ki67 rate was 71.4%-90.9% sensitive and 40%-56% specific for the diagnosis of nevus requiring re-excision or melanoma. Institutional practices differed in regard to reporting of Ki67 staining, the use of multiple markers in the workup of atypical melanocytic lesions (HMB45, Melan-A, Ki67 being most common), and consensus review. CONCLUSIONS: A negative or low Ki67 proliferation rate correlates well with rendering of a benign diagnosis. However, a low proliferation rate does not preclude the diagnosis of melanoma. Ki67 staining is most commonly used as an ancillary test to support a diagnosis after other factors have been considered, such as histopathologic morphology and results of additional concurrently used stains.

The role of gene fusions in melanocytic neoplasms.

Recent advances in next generation sequencing (NGS) have allowed for efficient whole transcriptome sequencing, leading to the identification of important kinase fusions as the primary driver in some melanocytic neoplasms. These fusions typically occur mutually exclusively of one another and other well-known initiating mutations such as BRAF, NRAS, NF1, KIT, and GNAQ. Fusions are found in over 50% of Spitz neoplasms, including ALK, BRAF, NTRK1, NTRK3, ROS1, MET, MAP3K8, and RET. Familiarity with the typical morphologic features of certain fusion-driven melanocytic neoplasms can help with classification, diagnosis, and identification of targeted molecular therapies in malignant cases. Spitz tumors with ALK, NTRK1, and NTRK3 fusions have characteristic morphologic features. BRAF and MAP3K8 fusions, in particular, tend to be epithelioid, high grade, and more frequent in Spitz melanoma than other fusion subtypes. Sporadic cases of pigmented epithelioid melanocytoma may have PRKCA fusions and sheets of monomorphic epithelioid melanocytes. Fusion events are also enriched among melanomas without the key mutations BRAF, NRAS, or NF1. Although NGS is the most reliable method to detect fusions, immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization are cost-effective alternatives in some cases. We describe recent discoveries regarding the role of kinase fusions in melanocytic neoplasms and their associated morphologies.

ß-Catenin nuclear expression discriminates deep penetrating nevi from other cutaneous melanocytic tumors.

Recent advances in genomics have improved the molecular classification of cutaneous melanocytic tumors. Among them, deep penetrating nevi (DPN) and plexiform nevi have been linked to joint activation of the MAP kinase and dysregulation of the ß-catenin pathways. Immunohistochemical studies have confirmed cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of ß-catenin and its downstream effector cyclin D1 in these tumors. We assessed nuclear ß-catenin immunohistochemical expression in a large group of DPN as well as in the four most frequent differential diagnoses of DPN: "blue" melanocytic tumors, Spitz tumors, nevoid and SSM melanomas, and pigmented epithelioid melanocytomas (PEM). Nuclear ß-catenin expression was positive in 98/100 DPN and 2/16 of melanomas (one SSM and one nevoid melanoma with a plexiform clone) and was negative in all 30 Spitz, 26 blue, and 6 PEM lesions. In 41% DPN, ß-catenin expression was positive in more than 30% nuclei. No differences were observed in cytoplasmic and nuclear cyclin D1 expression between these tumor groups, suggesting alternate, ß-catenin-independent, activation pathways. We have subsequently studied nuclear ß-catenin expression in a set of 13 tumors with an ambiguous diagnosis, for which DPN was part of the differential diagnosis. The three out of four patients showing canonical DPN mutation profiles were the only ß-catenin-positive cases. We conclude that nuclear ß-catenin expression, independently from CCND1 expression, in a dermal melanocytic tumor is an argument for its classification as DPN. In ambiguous cases and in early combined DPN lesions, this antibody can be helpful as a screening tool. ß-Catenin is also potentially expressed in a subset of malignant melanomas with CTNNB1 mutations.

Expression of p15 in a spectrum of spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: Accurate classification of spitzoid melanocytic lesions is difficult due to overlapping clinical and histopathologic features between Spitz nevi, atypical Spitz tumors (ASTs), and spitzoid melanomas. Expression of p16 (CDKN2A) has been used as a marker of spitzoid lesions. However, its expression may be variable. p15 is a tumor suppressor encoded by CDKN2B, loss of which has been recently shown to promote transition from nevus to melanoma. We sought to determine whether p15 is a useful immunohistochemical marker to distinguish Spitz nevi from spitzoid melanomas and to compare p15 and p16 staining in this population. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for p15 and p16 was performed on Spitz nevi (n = 19), ASTs (n = 41), and spitzoid melanomas (n = 17). Immunoexpression was categorized by a four-tiered system: 0 (negative), 1+ (weak), 2+ (moderate), 3+ (strong). RESULTS: 3+/strong p15 staining was observed in 68.4% of Spitz nevi, 34.2% of ASTs, and 17.7% of spitzoid melanomas. By contrast, we observed 3+ p16 staining in roughly equivalent percentages of Spitz nevi (57.9%), ASTs (56.1%), and spitzoid melanomas (58.8%). CONCLUSION: These data illustrate that p15 may be more useful than p16 as a biomarker to help distinguish benign from malignant spitzoid lesions.

The Amount of Melanin Influences p16 Loss in Spitzoid Melanocytic Lesions: Correlation With CDKN2A Status by FISH and MLPA.

AIMS: The risk assessment of spitzoid lesions is one of the most difficult challenges in dermatopathology practice. In this regard, the loss of p16 expression and the homozygous deletion of CDKN2A, have been pointed in the literature as reliable indicators of high risk. However, these findings are poorly reproducible, and the molecular bases underlying the loss of p16 expression remain unclear. We aimed to identify the underlying events causing loss of CDKN2A/p16 in spitzoid tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of p16, and the presence of CDKN2A genetic alterations detected through fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), in a series of 130 Spitz nevi, 20 atypical spitzoid tumors, and 11 spitzoid melanoma. RESULTS: We found a significant loss of p16 expression in cases with high amount of melanin content in the 3 groups (P<0.000001) and a similar proportion of p16-negative cases in the group of Spitz nevi and atypical spitzoid tumors. MLPA allowed the recognition of CDKN2A microdeletions, which correlated with p16 loss (P=0.01). MLPA and FISH were more accurate than immunohistochemistry to detect CDKN2A alterations; although contrary to MLPA, FISH fails to recognize CDKN2A microdeletions. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, p16 expression may be useful in the study of cases with atypical features and low melanin content, but it has no value in highly pigmented spitzoid lesions.

Nestin Expression in Spitzoid Lesions: An Immunohistochemical Characterization With Clinical and Dermoscopic Correlations.

Spindle or epithelioid melanocytic (Spitz) nevi usually affect children or adolescents and growth in the face or the lower extremities. Histologically, they may show cytoarchitectural atypia and mitotic figures that could represent diagnostic pitfalls with malignant melanoma. Atypical spitzoid tumors (AST) indicate lesions that microscopically show intermediate characteristics between benign nevi and malignant melanoma. Nestin expression has been evaluated in benign nevi and malignant melanoma, but no studies on its role in Spitz lesion have been elaborated so far. Our results indicate that Nestin could allow to discriminate between AST and malignant spiztoid melanoma; the typical dermoscopic pattern is also associated with benign nevi in contrast to the atypical pattern that accumunates AST and malignant spitzoid melanoma.

A Diagnostic Algorithm Combining Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Cytogenetics to Diagnose Challenging Melanocytic Tumors.

Some melanocytic tumors are diagnostic challenges and require ancillary tools in helping the pathologists to determine their potential of malignancy. We intend to propose a diagnostic algorithm in helping to classify challenging melanocytic tumors combining histology, immunohistochemistry, and cytogenetics. We report on 24 spitzoid and/or misdiagnosed melanocytic tumors studied with a triple p16, Ki-67, and HMB45 immunohistochemistry score, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with melanoma-dedicated and non-melanoma-dedicated probes and comparative genomic hybridization on DNA microarray (CGH array). Melanoma-dedicated FISH probe classified as favor malignant 8/8 melanomas, 1/2 atypical spitzoid tumor, and 4/14 nevi with polyploidy. Only 10 CGH array assays were contributive and concluded in complex chromosomal patterns as hallmarks of malignancy in 5 melanomas, single isolated imbalances in 3 nevi, and no chromosomal gain or loss in 2 nevi. The p16-Ki-67-HMB45 immunohistochemistry score was favor benign (ie, 0 to 3) in 13/14 nevi and in the favor benign atypical spitzoid tumor according to FISH analyses. The FISH-favor malignant atypical spitzoid tumor, 8/8 melanomas, and 1 tumor initially diagnosed as a Spitz nevus had favor malignant p16-Ki-67-HMB45 immunohistochemistry scores (ie, 4 to 9). Additional FISH analyses detected a 9p21/CDKN2A double deletion, frequently reported in melanomas but not in nevi, in the tumor initially diagnosed as a Spitz nevus with a favor malignant p16-Ki-67-HMB45 score. To conclude, in our opinion, histology and p16-Ki-67-HMB45 immunohistochemistry could consist in first-line tools to diagnose a difficult melanocytic tumor, followed by cytogenetics analyses in cases of discrepancies between histology and immunohistochemistry.

Differential UBE2C and HOXA1 expression in melanocytic nevi and melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Recent molecular advances suggest that Spitz nevi and other spitzoid neoplasms are biologically distinct from melanoma and conventional nevi. The ubiquitin ligase UBE2C and the homeobox transcription factor HOXA1 are candidate oncogenes in melanoma. METHODS: Using RNA expression analysis and immunohistochemistry, we evaluated these biomarkers in Spitz nevi (n = 20), melanoma (n = 20), and by immunohistochemistry in conventional nevi (n = 20). RESULTS: RNA analysis with branched DNA multiplex assay identified upregulation of UBE2C in melanomas vs Spitz nevi (P = .003), whereas HOXA1 was downregulated in melanoma (P < .0001). Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed increased nuclear expression of UBE2C in melanoma (mean = 18% of cells; range 3%-44%) when compared with Spitz nevi (mean = 9%; range 2%-28%; P = .001) and conventional nevi (mean = 1.5%; range 0-9%; P < .0001). Strong UBE2C staining was identified in cells undergoing mitosis. UBE2C RNA and protein detection correlated with mitotic rate (P < .0001). On the other hand, HOXA1 nuclear staining was low in melanoma (mean = 69%; range 5%-100%) when compared with Spitz nevi (mean = 94%; range 66%-100%; P = .0024) and conventional nevi (mean = 94%; range 83%-99%; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: UBE2C and HOXA1 RNA and protein are differentially expressed in conventional and Spitz nevi and melanoma.

Gene of the month: BAP1.

The BAP1 gene (BRCA1-associated protein 1) is a tumour suppressor gene that encodes a deubiquitinating enzyme (DUB), regulating key cellular pathways, including cell cycle, cellular differentiation, transcription and DNA damage response. Germline BAP1 mutations cause a novel cancer syndrome characterised by early onset of multiple atypical Spitz tumours and increased risk of uveal and cutaneous melanoma, mesothelioma, renal cell carcinoma and various other malignancies. Recognising the clinicopathological features of specific BAP1-deficient tumours is crucial for early screening/tumour detection, with significant impact on patient outcome.

A diagnostic algorithm for atypical spitzoid tumors: guidelines for immunohistochemical and molecular assessment.

Atypical spitzoid tumors are a morphologically diverse group of rare melanocytic lesions most frequently seen in children and young adults. As atypical spitzoid tumors bear striking resemblance to Spitz nevus and spitzoid melanomas clinically and histopathologically, it is crucial to determine its malignant potential and predict its clinical behavior. To date, many researchers have attempted to differentiate atypical spitzoid tumors from unequivocal melanomas based on morphological, immonohistochemical, and molecular diagnostic differences. A diagnostic algorithm is proposed here to assess the malignant potential of atypical spitzoid tumors by using a combination of immunohistochemical and cytogenetic/molecular tests. Together with classical morphological evaluation, this algorithm includes a set of immunohistochemistry assays (p16(Ink4a), a dual-color Ki67/MART-1, and HMB45), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with five probes (6p25, 8q24, 11q13, CEN9, and 9p21), and an array-based comparative genomic hybridization. This review discusses details of the algorithm, the rationale of each test used in the algorithm, and utility of this algorithm in routine dermatopathology practice. This algorithmic approach will provide a comprehensive diagnostic tool that complements conventional histological criteria and will significantly contribute to improve the diagnosis and prediction of the clinical behavior of atypical spitzoid tumors.

Spitz nevus arising in the eyelid of a teenager.

A 16-year-old boy developed over a 2-month interval a lightly pigmented left upper eyelid lesion measuring 1.5 mm in greatest diameter that, when excised, microscopically was hypercellular and composed almost exclusively of nonpigmented epithelioid cells that created florid, large intraepidermal junctional nests and sheets and nests of subepidermal cells. The diagnosis was a Spitz nevus. HMB-45, MART-1, and microphthalmia-associated transcription factor were all positive and established the melanocytic nature of the benign tumor. The Ki-67 proliferation index (5%) and 2 mitoses/mm(2) were both low; p16 protein was immunohistochemically identified in the nevoid cells. We review the clinical, histopathologic, and other immunohistochemical features of this entity and provide a brief differential diagnosis (including separation from a Spitzoid melanoma). This is only the third eyelid Spitz nevus reported in the literature and is the most fully characterized immunohistochemically. At their present stage of development, contemporary immunohistochemical biomarkers, while providing supplemental information, nonetheless remain less than definitive in terms of reliably distinguishing benign from malignant Spitz lesions.