Subject(s)
Rare Diseases/diagnosis , Rare Diseases/therapy , Animals , Biomedical Research/economics , Child, Preschool , Drug Discovery , Humans , Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C/diagnosis , Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C/economics , Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C/genetics , Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C/therapy , Rare Diseases/economics , Rare Diseases/genetics , Sheep , Tay-Sachs Disease/diagnosis , Tay-Sachs Disease/economics , Tay-Sachs Disease/genetics , Tay-Sachs Disease/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Niemann-Pick disease type C (NP-C) is a rare and devastating genetic disorder characterised by a range of progressive neurological symptoms, which imposes a burden on patients, family members, the healthcare system and society overall. The objective of this study was to assess direct and indirect costs associated with NP-C in the UK. METHODS: This was a non-interventional, retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study based on responses from patients and/or their carers/guardians recruited from a UK NP-C database. Resource use and direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect costs were evaluated using data collected via postal survey in October 2007, which included a Medical Resource Use questionnaire. Total annual costs per patient were estimated. RESULTS: In total, 18 Medical Resource Use questionnaires (29% response rate) were received and analysed. The mean total annual cost (SD) of NP-C per patient was 39,168 pounds (50,315 pounds); 46% were direct medical costs, to which home visits and residential care contributed 68% and 15%, respectively. Direct non-medical costs accounted for 24% of the average annual cost per patient, mainly due to specialist education, and indirect costs 30%. If only direct medical costs were considered, the mean annual cost (SD) per patient was reduced to 18,012 pounds (46,536 pounds). CONCLUSIONS: The direct annual per-patient cost of NP-C illness in 2007 appears moderate when compared with other rare and severely disabling diseases. However, cost estimates may be conservative, since findings are limited by a small sample size, low survey response rate and potential recall bias. As demonstrated by this study, a substantial proportion of the cost is shifted from the healthcare system to the patient, family and non-medical providers. These findings highlight the need for treatments that can slow or stop disease progression in NP-C.