Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Cell Death Dis ; 12(12): 1085, 2021 11 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34785659

ABSTRACT

Nuclear transfer embryonic stem cells (ntESCs) hold enormous promise for individual-specific regenerative medicine. However, the chromatin states of ntESCs remain poorly characterized. In this study, we employed ATAC-seq and Hi-C techniques to explore the chromatin accessibility and three-dimensional (3D) genome organization of ntESCs. The results show that the chromatin accessibility and genome structures of somatic cells are re-arranged to ESC-like states overall in ntESCs, including compartments, topologically associating domains (TADs) and chromatin loops. However, compared to fertilized ESCs (fESCs), ntESCs show some abnormal openness and structures that have not been reprogrammed completely, which impair the differentiation potential of ntESCs. The histone modification H3K9me3 may be involved in abnormal structures in ntESCs, including incorrect compartment switches and incomplete TAD rebuilding. Moreover, ntESCs and iPSCs show high similarity in 3D genome structures, while a few differences are detected due to different somatic cell origins and reprogramming mechanisms. Through systematic analyses, our study provides a global view of chromatin accessibility and 3D genome organization in ntESCs, which can further facilitate the understanding of the similarities and differences between ntESCs and fESCs.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/metabolism , Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Female , Humans , Mice
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(17)2021 Aug 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34502145

ABSTRACT

Pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells (PSC-MPCs) are primarily derived through two main methods: three-dimensional (3D) embryoid body-platform (EB formation) and the 2D direct differentiation method. We recently established somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT)-PSC lines and showed their stemness. In the present study, we produced SCNT-PSC-MPCs using a novel direct differentiation method, and the characteristics, gene expression, and genetic stability of these MPCs were compared with those derived through EB formation. The recovery and purification of SCNT-PSC-Direct-MPCs were significantly accelerated compared to those of the SCNT-PSC-EB-MPCs, but both types of MPCs expressed typical surface markers and exhibited similar proliferation and differentiation potentials. Additionally, the analysis of gene expression patterns using microarrays showed very similar patterns. Moreover, array CGH analysis showed that both SCNT-PSC-Direct-MPCs and SCNT-PSC-EB-MPCs exhibited no significant differences in copy number variation (CNV) or single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) frequency. These results indicate that SCNT-PSC-Direct-MPCs exhibited high genetic stability even after rapid differentiation into MPCs, and the rate at which directly derived MPCs reached a sufficient number was higher than that of MPCs derived through the EB method. Therefore, we suggest that the direct method of differentiating MPCs from SCNT-PSCs can improve the efficacy of SCNT-PSCs applied to allogeneic transplantation.


Subject(s)
Genomic Instability , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/metabolism , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Cell Differentiation , Cell Line , Cells, Cultured , Humans , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/cytology , Polymorphism, Genetic
4.
Zygote ; 27(3): 137-142, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31036094

ABSTRACT

SummaryChemical oocyte enucleation holds the potential to ease somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), although high enucleation rates remain limited to micromanipulation-based approaches. Therefore, this study aimed to test mitomycin C (MMC) for use in bovine functional chemical oocyte enucleation. Incubation of denuded eggs in 10 µg ml-1 MMC for different periods did not affect most maturation rates (0.5 h: 85.78%A, 1.0 h: 72.77%B, 1.5 h: 83.87%A, and 2.0 h: 82.05%A) in comparison with non-treated controls (CTL; 85.77%A). Parthenogenetic development arrest by MMC was efficient at cleavage (CTL: 72.93%A, 0.5 h: 64.92%A,B, 1.0 h: 60.39%B,C, 1.5 h: 66.35%A,B, and 2.0 h: 53.84%C) and blastocyst stages (CTL: 33.94%A, 0.5 h: 7.58%B, 1.0 h: 2.47%C, 1.5 h: 0.46%C, and 2.0 h: 0.51%C). Blastocysts were obtained after nuclear transfer (NT) using MMC enucleation [NT(MMC): 4.54%B] but at lower rates than for the SCNT control [NT(CTL): 26.31%A]. The removal of the meiotic spindle after MMC incubation fully restored SCNT blastocyst development [NT(MMC+SR): 24.74%A]. Early pregnancies were obtained by the transfer of NT(MMC) and NT(MMC+SR) blastocysts to synchronized recipients. In conclusion, MMC leads to functional chemical oocyte enucleation during SCNT and further suggests its potential for application towards technical improvements.


Subject(s)
Blastocyst/drug effects , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Cloning, Organism/methods , Mitomycin/pharmacology , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Oocytes/drug effects , Animals , Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/pharmacology , Blastocyst/cytology , Blastocyst/metabolism , Cattle , Cloning, Organism/veterinary , Embryo Transfer , Embryonic Development , Female , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/veterinary , Oocytes/cytology , Oocytes/metabolism , Parthenogenesis , Pregnancy
5.
Fertil Steril ; 105(4): e1-4, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26746137

ABSTRACT

This document presents arguments that conclude that it is unethical to use somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) for infertility treatment due to concerns about safety; the unknown impact of SCNT on children, families, and society; and the availability of other ethically acceptable means of assisted reproduction. This document replaces the ASRM Ethics Committee report titled, "Human somatic cell nuclear transfer and cloning," last published in Fertil Steril 2012;98:804-7.


Subject(s)
Cloning, Molecular , Ethics Committees, Clinical/standards , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/ethics , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Cell Nucleus , Cloning, Molecular/methods , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/standards
6.
Nature ; 511(7508): 177-83, 2014 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25008523

ABSTRACT

Human pluripotent stem cells hold potential for regenerative medicine, but available cell types have significant limitations. Although embryonic stem cells (ES cells) from in vitro fertilized embryos (IVF ES cells) represent the 'gold standard', they are allogeneic to patients. Autologous induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) are prone to epigenetic and transcriptional aberrations. To determine whether such abnormalities are intrinsic to somatic cell reprogramming or secondary to the reprogramming method, genetically matched sets of human IVF ES cells, iPS cells and nuclear transfer ES cells (NT ES cells) derived by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) were subjected to genome-wide analyses. Both NT ES cells and iPS cells derived from the same somatic cells contained comparable numbers of de novo copy number variations. In contrast, DNA methylation and transcriptome profiles of NT ES cells corresponded closely to those of IVF ES cells, whereas iPS cells differed and retained residual DNA methylation patterns typical of parental somatic cells. Thus, human somatic cells can be faithfully reprogrammed to pluripotency by SCNT and are therefore ideal for cell replacement therapies.


Subject(s)
Cellular Reprogramming , Pluripotent Stem Cells/metabolism , Animals , Cell Line , Chromosome Aberrations , Chromosomes, Human, X/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, X/metabolism , DNA Copy Number Variations , DNA Methylation , Genome-Wide Association Study , Genomic Imprinting , Humans , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology , Transcriptome
7.
Nature ; 493(7434): 632-7, 2013 Jan 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23254936

ABSTRACT

Mitochondrial DNA mutations transmitted maternally within the oocyte cytoplasm often cause life-threatening disorders. Here we explore the use of nuclear genome transfer between unfertilized oocytes of two donors to prevent the transmission of mitochondrial mutations. Nuclear genome transfer did not reduce developmental efficiency to the blastocyst stage, and genome integrity was maintained provided that spontaneous oocyte activation was avoided through the transfer of incompletely assembled spindle-chromosome complexes. Mitochondrial DNA transferred with the nuclear genome was initially detected at levels below 1%, decreasing in blastocysts and stem-cell lines to undetectable levels, and remained undetectable after passaging for more than one year, clonal expansion, differentiation into neurons, cardiomyocytes or ß-cells, and after cellular reprogramming. Stem cells and differentiated cells had mitochondrial respiratory chain enzyme activities and oxygen consumption rates indistinguishable from controls. These results demonstrate the potential of nuclear genome transfer to prevent the transmission of mitochondrial disorders in humans.


Subject(s)
DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Oocytes , Cell Line , Cells, Cultured , Cryopreservation , Embryonic Development , Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Genotype , Humans , Mitochondria/genetics , Mitochondria/metabolism , Oocytes/cytology , Oocytes/metabolism
8.
Nature ; 493(7434): 627-31, 2013 Jan 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23103867

ABSTRACT

Mutations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are associated with severe human diseases and are maternally inherited through the egg's cytoplasm. Here we investigated the feasibility of mtDNA replacement in human oocytes by spindle transfer (ST; also called spindle-chromosomal complex transfer). Of 106 human oocytes donated for research, 65 were subjected to reciprocal ST and 33 served as controls. Fertilization rate in ST oocytes (73%) was similar to controls (75%); however, a significant portion of ST zygotes (52%) showed abnormal fertilization as determined by an irregular number of pronuclei. Among normally fertilized ST zygotes, blastocyst development (62%) and embryonic stem cell isolation (38%) rates were comparable to controls. All embryonic stem cell lines derived from ST zygotes had normal euploid karyotypes and contained exclusively donor mtDNA. The mtDNA can be efficiently replaced in human oocytes. Although some ST oocytes displayed abnormal fertilization, remaining embryos were capable of developing to blastocysts and producing embryonic stem cells similar to controls.


Subject(s)
Genetic Therapy , Mitochondrial Diseases/genetics , Mitochondrial Diseases/therapy , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Adult , Animals , Cell Nucleus/genetics , Cryopreservation , Cytoplasm/genetics , DNA, Mitochondrial/analysis , DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics , Embryo, Mammalian/embryology , Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , Female , Fertilization , Humans , Macaca mulatta/genetics , Macaca mulatta/growth & development , Microsatellite Repeats/genetics , Oocytes/cytology , Pregnancy , Young Adult , Zygote/cytology , Zygote/pathology
9.
Rev Sci Tech ; 31(3): 761-75, 2012 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23520731

ABSTRACT

The trade of livestock or their products between nations requires information on the risk of introducing infectious agents such as foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV). Although transmission pathways for FMDV vary, a recent concern in the United States (USA) is that it might enter via cloned embryos. A quantitative risk assessment model was developed to determine the scenarios (with mathematical probabilities) that could lead to the introduction and maintenance of FMDV via the importation of cloned bovine embryos. Using @RISK software with Monte Carlo simulation involving 50,000 iterations, the probability of introducing FMDV via cloned embryos was estimated to be 3.1 x 10(-7). Given the current cloning protocol, and assuming the annual importation of 250 to 1,700 (mean = 520) cloned embryos, the expected number of infected embryos ranges from 1.1 x 10(-7) to 4.4 x 10(-3) (mean = 1.6 x 10(-4)) per year. Critical pathway analysis showed that the risk of FMDV entering the USA by this route is extremely low.


Subject(s)
Cattle/embryology , Cloning, Organism/veterinary , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/transmission , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/veterinary , Animals , Cloning, Organism/standards , Embryo Culture Techniques/standards , Embryo Culture Techniques/veterinary , Embryo Transfer/standards , Embryo Transfer/veterinary , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/prevention & control , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Risk Factors , United States
10.
Hastings Cent Rep ; 41(1): 32-42, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21329104

ABSTRACT

John Harris and Julian Savulescu, leading figures in the "new' eugenics, argue that parents are morally obligated to use genetic and other technologies to enhance their children. But the argument they give leads to conclusions even more radical than they acknowledge. Ultimately, the world it would lead to is not all that different from that championed by eugenicists one hundred years ago.


Subject(s)
Bioethical Issues , Eugenics/trends , Fertilization in Vitro/ethics , Genetic Enhancement/ethics , Moral Obligations , Eugenics/methods , Fertilization in Vitro/trends , Forecasting , Genetic Enhancement/standards , Humans , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/ethics , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Preimplantation Diagnosis/ethics , Preimplantation Diagnosis/methods
12.
Transgenic Res ; 19(4): 611-20, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19937273

ABSTRACT

Development of a transgenic porcine biomedical research model requires effective delivery of DNA into the donor cell followed by selection of genetically modified somatic cell lines to be used for nuclear transfer. The objective of the current study was 2-fold: (1) to compare the effectiveness of a single 1 ms pulse of different voltages (V; 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350) and multiple 1 ms pulses (1, 2, 3, 4 or 5) at 300 V for delivery and expression of super-coiled GFP vector in surviving cells of three fetal fibroblast cell lines, and (2) to determine the ability of these electroporation parameters to produce stably transfected fibroblast colonies following G418 selection. Cell line (P < 0.001) and voltage (P < 0.001) affected DNA delivery into the cell as assessed by GFP expression while survival at 24 h was affected by voltage (P < 0.001) and not by cell line (P = 0.797). Using a single pulse while increasing voltage resulted in the percentage of GFP expressing cells increasing from 3.2 +/- 0.8% to 43.0 +/- 3.4% while survival decreased from 90.5 +/- 8.0% to 44.8 +/- 2.0%. The number of pulses at 300 V significantly affected survival (P < 0.001) and GFP expression (P < 0.001). Survival steadily decreased following 1-5 pulses from 63.2 +/- 6.3% to 3.0 +/- 0.3% with GFP expression of surviving cells increasing from 35.6 +/- 2.67% to 71.4 +/- 6.1%. Electroporation of a selectable marker at a 1:1 copy number ratio to a co-electroporated transgene resulted in 83% of G418 resistant colonies also being PCR positive for the secondary transgene. These electroporation conditions, specifically, three 1 ms pulses of 300 V to 200 muL of 1 x 10(6) cells/mL in the presence of 12.5 mug DNA/mL effectively introduced DNA into somatic cells. The utilization of these conditions produced numerous transgenic fibroblast colonies following G418 selection that when used for somatic cell nuclear transfer resulted in the production of live offspring.


Subject(s)
Electroporation/methods , Fetus/metabolism , Fibroblasts/metabolism , Swine , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Calibration , Cells, Cultured , Cloning, Organism/methods , Cloning, Organism/veterinary , Drug Resistance/genetics , Electroporation/standards , Embryo, Mammalian , Fetus/cytology , Fetus/drug effects , Fibroblasts/cytology , Fibroblasts/drug effects , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Neomycin/pharmacology , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/veterinary , Swine/embryology , Transfection/methods , Transfection/standards , Transgenes
13.
Theor Med Bioeth ; 30(5): 367-84, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19653124

ABSTRACT

We examine whether the current regulatory regime instituted in South Korea and the United States would have prevented Hwang's potential transgressions in oocyte procurement for somatic cell nuclear transfer, we compare the general aspects and oversight framework of the Bioethics and Biosafety Act in South Korea and the US National Academies' Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, and apply the relevant provisions and recommendations to each transgression. We conclude that the Act would institute centralized oversight under governmental auspices while the Guidelines recommend politically-independent, decentralized oversight bodies including a special review body for human embryonic stem cell research at an institutional level and that the Guidelines would have provided more vigorous protection for the women who had undergone oocyte procurement for Hwang's research than the Act. We also suggest additional regulations to protect those who provide oocytes for research in South Korea.


Subject(s)
Bioethical Issues/legislation & jurisprudence , Embryo Research , Embryonic Stem Cells , Nuclear Transfer Techniques , Oocytes , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Research Personnel , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Adult , Conflict of Interest , Embryo Research/ethics , Embryo Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethical Analysis , Ethics, Research , Female , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , National Academy of Sciences, U.S. , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/ethics , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/legislation & jurisprudence , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Physician-Patient Relations , Republic of Korea , Research Personnel/ethics , Research Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Tissue Donors/psychology , Tissue and Organ Procurement/ethics , Tissue and Organ Procurement/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
14.
Reprod Domest Anim ; 43 Suppl 2: 407-16, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18638154

ABSTRACT

Despite more than a decade of research efforts, farm animal cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is still frustratingly inefficient. Inefficiency manifests itself at different levels, which are currently not well integrated. At the molecular level, it leads to widespread genetic, epigenetic and transcriptional aberrations in cloned embryos. At the organismal level, these genome-wide abnormalities compromise development of cloned foetuses and offspring. Specific molecular defects need to be causally linked to specific cloned phenotypes, in order to design specific treatments to correct them. Cloning efficiency depends on the ability of the nuclear donor cell to be fully reprogrammed into an embryonic state and the ability of the enucleated recipient cell to carry out the reprogramming reactions. It has been postulated that reprogrammability of the somatic donor cell epigenome is influenced by its differentiation status. However, direct comparisons between cells of divergent differentiation status within several somatic lineages have found no conclusive evidence for this. Choosing somatic stem cells as donors has not improved cloning efficiency, indicating that donor cell type may be less critical for cloning success. Different recipient cells, on the other hand, vary in their reprogramming ability. In bovine, using zygotes instead of oocytes has increased cloning success. Other improvements in livestock cloning efficiency include better coordinating donor cell type with cell cycle stage and aggregating cloned embryos. In the future, it will be important to demonstrate if these small increases at every step are cumulative, adding up to an integrated cloning protocol with greatly improved efficiency.


Subject(s)
Animals, Genetically Modified , Cloning, Organism/veterinary , Epigenesis, Genetic , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/veterinary , Animals , Animals, Domestic , Cloning, Organism/methods , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Parthenogenesis
15.
Differentiation ; 76(1): 3-14, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18093226

ABSTRACT

Gametes of both sexes (sperm and oocyte) are highly specialized and differentiated but within a very short time period post-fertilization the embryonic genome, produced by the combination of the two highly specialized parental genomes, is completely converted into a totipotent state. As a result, the one-cell-stage embryo can give rise to all cell types of all three embryonic layers, including the gametes. Thus, it is evident that extensive and efficient reprogramming steps occur soon after fertilization and also probably during early embryogenesis to reverse completely the differentiated state of the gamete and to achieve toti- or later on pluripotency of embryonic cells. However, after the embryo reaches the blastocyst stage, the first two distinct cell lineages can be clearly distinguished--the trophectoderm and the inner cells mass. The de-differentiation of gametes after fertilization, as well as the differentiation that is associated with the formation of blastocysts, are accompanied by changes in the state and properties of chromatin in individual embryonic nuclei at both the whole genome level as well as at the level of individual genes. In this contribution, we focus mainly on those events that take place soon after fertilization and during early embryogenesis in mammals. We will discuss the changes in DNA methylation and covalent histone modifications that were shown to be highly dynamic during this period; moreover, it has also been documented that abnormalities in these processes have a devastating impact on the developmental ability of embryos. Special attention will be paid to somatic cell nuclear transfer as it has been shown that the aberrant and inefficient reprogramming may be responsible for compromised development of cloned embryos.


Subject(s)
Cellular Reprogramming/genetics , Chromatin/genetics , Embryonic Development/genetics , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/adverse effects , Animals , Blastocyst/metabolism , Cell Dedifferentiation , Cell Differentiation , Cell Nucleus/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , Chromatin/pathology , Cleavage Stage, Ovum/metabolism , Cloning, Organism/adverse effects , DNA Methylation , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/etiology , Germ Cells/metabolism , Histones/genetics , Humans , Mammals , Morula/metabolism , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Pluripotent Stem Cells , Totipotent Stem Cells
16.
Theriogenology ; 68(8): 1128-37, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17875317

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to examine pregnancy progression and fetal characteristics following transfer of vitrified bovine nuclear transfer versus in vivo-derived embryos. Nuclear transfer (NT) was conducted using cumulus cells collected from an elite Holstein-Friesian dairy cow. Expanding and hatching blastocysts on Day 7 were vitrified using liquid nitrogen surface vitrification. Day 7 in vivo embryos, produced using standard superovulation procedures applied to Holstein-Friesian heifers (n=6), were vitrified in the same way. Following warming, embryos were transferred to synchronized recipients (NT: n=65 recipients; Vivo: n=20 recipients). Pregnancies were monitored by ultrasound scanning on Days 25, 45 and 75 and a sample of animals were slaughtered at each time point to recover the fetus/placenta for further analyses. Significantly more animals remained pregnant after transfer of in vivo-derived embryos than NT embryos at all time points: Day 25 (95.0 versus 67.7%, P<0.05), Day 45 (92.8 versus 49.1%, P<0.01) and Day 75 (70.0 versus 20.8%, P<0.0). There was no significant difference (P=0.10) in the weight of the conceptus on Day 25 from NT transfers (1.14+/-0.23 g, n=8) versus in vivo transfers (0.75+/-0.19 g, n=8). On Day 45, there was no significant difference in the weight of either fetus (P=0.393) or membranes (P=0.167) between NT embryos (fetus: 2.76+/-0.40, n=12; membranes: 59.0+/-10.0, n=11) or in vivo-derived embryos (fetus: 2.60+/-0.15, n=6; membranes: 41.8+/-5.2, n=4). However, on Day 75 the weight of the fetus and several of the major organs were heavier from NT embryos. These data suggest that morphological abnormalities involving the fetus and the placenta of cloned pregnancies are manifested after Day 45.


Subject(s)
Cattle/embryology , Cloning, Organism/veterinary , Fetus/anatomy & histology , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/veterinary , Animals , Blastocyst/cytology , Cattle/physiology , Embryo Transfer/veterinary , Female , Fetal Weight , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Organ Size , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Time Factors
17.
Hum Reprod ; 22(3): 629-34, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17079245

ABSTRACT

The future success of stem cell research by means of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) depends on a sufficient supply of human oocytes. However, oocyte donation presents certain risks for the donor, and concerns for women's welfare are rightly vocalized. At the same time, these risks are comparable with the risks faced by other healthy research subjects. Thus, research donation can withstand ethical scrutiny if it fulfils the same conditions as other research involving healthy human subjects. Specifically, this means that the benefits of the research project need to outweigh the harms, that risks must be minimized, that informed consent has to be guaranteed by averting undue inducement and the recruitment of vulnerable women and that donors can and should be reimbursed for their research participation.


Subject(s)
Ethics, Research , Oocyte Donation/ethics , Research/standards , Stem Cells , Female , Humans , Informed Consent , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Oocyte Donation/economics , Oocyte Donation/standards , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/prevention & control , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Ovulation Induction/standards
18.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 591: 1-13, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17176551

ABSTRACT

A better understanding of the cellular and molecular events that occur when a nucleus is transferred to the cytoplasm of an oocyte will permit the development of improved procedures for performing nuclear transfer and cloning. In some cases it appears that the gene(s) are reprogrammed, while in other cases there appears to be little effect on gene expression. Not only does the pattern of gene expression need to be reprogrammed, but other structures within the nucleus also need to be remodeled. While nuclear transfer works and transgenic and knockout animals can be created, it still is an inefficient process. However, even with the current low efficiencies this technique has proved very valuable for the production of animals that might be useful for tissue or organ transplantation to humans.


Subject(s)
Animals, Genetically Modified/genetics , Cell Nucleus/genetics , Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly/genetics , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/trends , Sus scrofa/genetics , Animals , Body Size/genetics , Epigenesis, Genetic/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation/genetics , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Transgenes/genetics
19.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 591: 14-29, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17176552

ABSTRACT

The recent successes in producing cloned offspring by somatic cell nuclear transfer are nothing short of remarkable. This process requires the somatic cell chromatin to substitute functionally for both the egg and the sperm genomes, and indeed the processing of the transferred nuclei shares aspects in common with processing of both parental genomes in normal fertilized embryos. Recent studies have yielded new information about the degree to which this substitution is accomplished. Overall, it has become evident that multiple aspects of genome processing and function are aberrant, indicating that the somatic cell chromatin only infrequently manages the successful transition to a competent surrogate for gamete genomes. This review focuses on recent results revealing these limitations and how they might be overcome.


Subject(s)
Cell Nucleus/genetics , Cloning, Organism/methods , Cloning, Organism/trends , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/trends , Animals , Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly/genetics , Clone Cells/metabolism , Cloning, Organism/standards , Embryonic Development/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/genetics , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Oocytes/cytology , Oocytes/physiology , Research Embryo Creation/methods , Research Embryo Creation/standards
20.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 591: 30-57, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17176553

ABSTRACT

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is much more widely and efficiently practiced in cattle than in any other species, making this arguably the most important mammal cloned to date. While the initial objective behind cattle cloning was commercially driven--in particular to multiply genetically superior animals with desired phenotypic traits and to produce genetically modified animals-researchers have now started to use bovine SCNT as a tool to address diverse questions in developmental and cell biology. In this paper, we review current cattle cloning methodologies and their potential technical or biological pitfalls at any step of the procedure. In doing so, we focus on one methodological parameter, namely donor cell selection. We emphasize the impact of epigenetic and genetic differences between embryonic, germ, and somatic donor cell types on cloning efficiency. Lastly, we discuss adult phenotypes and fitness of cloned cattle and their offspring and illustrate some of the more imminent commercial cattle cloning applications.


Subject(s)
Cattle/genetics , Cell Nucleus/genetics , Cloning, Organism/methods , Cloning, Organism/trends , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/trends , Animals , Cloning, Organism/standards , Embryonic Development/genetics , Epigenesis, Genetic/genetics , Genotype , Germ Cells/metabolism , Humans , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/standards , Research Embryo Creation/methods , Research Embryo Creation/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...