Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 26 Suppl 3: S25-S31, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30070039

ABSTRACT

Low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) are found in a variety of foods and beverages, yet their role in diet, weight, and obesity-related chronic disease is controversial. This article summarizes proceedings from one of four presentations during a preconference session entitled "Low-Calorie Sweeteners and Weight Management," which took place at the 2017 Obesity Society Annual Meeting in Washington, District of Columbia. The objective of this brief review is to summarize findings of observational and interventional studies of LCS effects on weight and metabolic health and to provide potential explanations for their discrepant results. Key research priorities for advancing the understanding of the role of LCS in weight and chronic disease are also discussed. The existing literature suggests that LCS consumption is consistently associated with obesity, diabetes, and related cardiometabolic conditions in observational studies. Although several plausible mechanisms have been proposed to explain these associations and have received considerable support in cellular and rodent models, the relevance of these mechanisms to humans has yet to be confirmed. Meanwhile, randomized controlled trials demonstrate that NNS may benefit weight loss and weight maintenance. This is the case particularly when LCS are administered in the context of behavioral weight loss support and are consumed knowingly by habitual LCS consumers. Although these findings suggest that LCS may be useful for weight control among those cognitively engaged in weight loss and who are aware of their LCS consumption, LCS administration in these studies does not reflect typical consumption. Furthermore, few interventional studies have assessed the role of LCS on metabolic outcomes other than body weight. Additional factors must be considered before recommending LCS for weight management and chronic disease prevention and further study of LCS effects on a variety of cardiometabolic outcomes, including visceral adiposity and glucose homeostasis is warranted.


Subject(s)
Energy Intake , Non-Nutritive Sweeteners/therapeutic use , Nutritive Sweeteners/therapeutic use , Overweight/diet therapy , Body Weight , Health Promotion , Homeostasis/drug effects , Humans , Non-Nutritive Sweeteners/adverse effects , Nutritive Sweeteners/adverse effects , Obesity/prevention & control , Overweight/prevention & control , Weight Loss
2.
Nutrients ; 9(4)2017 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28368311

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare the glycemic response of Caucasians and Asians to two disaccharides of different glycemic index (GI), and to examine if ethnic groups that showed the largest glycemic response to sucrose would benefit the most when it is replaced with isomaltulose. Forty healthy participants (10 Chinese; 10 Malays; 10 Caucasians; and 10 Indians) consumed beverages containing 50 g of sucrose or isomaltulose on two separate occasions using a randomized crossover design. Capillary blood glucose was measured in a fasted state and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min after beverage ingestion. Glycemic response to sucrose was significantly higher in Malays compared to Caucasians (p = 0.041), but did not differ between Caucasians vs. Chinese (p = 0.145) or vs. Indians (p = 0.661). When sucrose was replaced with isomaltulose, glycemic responses were significantly reduced in all ethnic groups, with the largest reduction in glycemic response being observed in Malays. Malays, who had the greatest glycemic response to sucrose, also showed the greatest improvement in glycemic response when sucrose was replaced with isomaltulose. This implies that Malays who are more susceptible to type 2 diabetes mellitus may benefit from strategies that replace high GI carbohydrate with lower GI alternatives to assist in glycemic control.


Subject(s)
Dietary Sucrose/adverse effects , Glycemic Index , Hyperglycemia/etiology , Isomaltose/analogs & derivatives , Nutritive Sweeteners/adverse effects , Adult , Asian People , Beverages/adverse effects , Blood Glucose/analysis , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Glucose Intolerance/epidemiology , Glucose Intolerance/ethnology , Glucose Intolerance/prevention & control , Humans , Hyperglycemia/blood , Hyperglycemia/ethnology , Hyperglycemia/prevention & control , Isomaltose/adverse effects , Isomaltose/therapeutic use , Malaysia/ethnology , Male , Nutritive Sweeteners/therapeutic use , Postprandial Period , Risk , Singapore/epidemiology , White People , Young Adult
3.
Nutrients ; 9(4)2017 Apr 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28406437

ABSTRACT

Low glycemic index diets are supposed to achieve a more beneficial effect on blood glucose control in people with diabetes mellitus and may also provide metabolic benefits for the general population. A prototype of a low-glycemic index carbohydrate is the natural occurring disaccharide isomaltulose that can be commercially produced from sucrose (beet sugar) to industrial scale. It is currently used in various food and drink applications as well as special and clinical nutrition feeds and formula diet as a food ingredient and alternative sugar. Here we provide an overview on clinical trials with isomaltulose including an analysis of its effects on glycemia and fat oxidation as compared to high glycemic index sugars and carbohydrates. In addition, we discuss recent reports on beneficial effects in weight-loss maintenance and pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diet therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diet therapy , Diet, Diabetic , Glycemic Index , Hyperglycemia/prevention & control , Isomaltose/analogs & derivatives , Nutritive Sweeteners/therapeutic use , Athletic Performance , Body Weight Maintenance , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cognition , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diet, Diabetic/adverse effects , Diet, Reducing/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Isomaltose/adverse effects , Isomaltose/therapeutic use , Male , Nutritive Sweeteners/adverse effects , Overweight/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Weight Reduction Programs
4.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab ; 42(4): 377-383, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28177738

ABSTRACT

Previous studies have suggested that sorbitol, a known polyol sweetener, possesses glycemic control potentials. However, the effect of sorbitol on intestinal glucose absorption and muscle glucose uptake still remains elusive. The present study investigated the effects of sorbitol on intestinal glucose absorption and muscle glucose uptake as possible anti-hyperglycemic or glycemic control potentials using ex vivo and in vivo experimental models. Sorbitol (2.5% to 20%) inhibited glucose absorption in isolated rat jejuna (IC50 = 14.6% ± 4.6%) and increased glucose uptake in isolated rat psoas muscle with (GU50 = 3.5% ± 1.6%) or without insulin (GU50 = 7.0% ± 0.5%) in a concentration-dependent manner. Furthermore, sorbitol significantly delayed gastric emptying, accelerated digesta transit, inhibited intestinal glucose absorption, and reduced blood glucose increase in both normoglycemic and type 2 diabetic rats after 1 h of coingestion with glucose. Data of this study suggest that sorbitol exhibited anti-hyperglycemic potentials, possibly via increasing muscle glucose uptake ex vivo and reducing intestinal glucose absorption in normal and type 2 diabetic rats. Hence, sorbitol may be further investigated as a possible anti-hyperglycemic sweetener.


Subject(s)
Absorption, Physiological , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diet therapy , Glucose/metabolism , Intestinal Absorption , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Nutritive Sweeteners/therapeutic use , Sorbitol/therapeutic use , Absorption, Physiological/drug effects , Animals , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism , Dietary Carbohydrates/metabolism , Gastric Emptying/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Transit/drug effects , Hyperglycemia/prevention & control , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/metabolism , Hypoglycemic Agents/pharmacology , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , In Vitro Techniques , Insulin, Short-Acting/pharmacology , Intestinal Absorption/drug effects , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Jejunum/drug effects , Jejunum/metabolism , Kinetics , Male , Metformin/pharmacology , Muscle, Skeletal/drug effects , Nutritive Sweeteners/adverse effects , Nutritive Sweeteners/metabolism , Random Allocation , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Sorbitol/adverse effects , Sorbitol/metabolism
5.
Rev. esp. nutr. comunitaria ; 22(4): 0-0, oct.-dic. 2016. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-165144

ABSTRACT

Synsepalum Dulicifum es un arbusto tropical que produce una baya conocida como fruta milagrosa por su peculiaridad de enmascarar los sabores ácidos, volviéndolos dulces. Esta característica le ha sido atribuida a la baya por la presencia de una glucoproteína denominada 'miraculina'. Esta acción ha llamado la atención de los científicos y se han generado nuevas líneas de investigación para poder conocer los mecanismos por los que esta proteína ejerce su acción, y su posible aplicación sobre la salud humana. Se ha valorado su uso como edulcorante natural, para elaborar alimentos bajos en azúcares simples destinados a diabéticos y personas con obesidad. Hay algunas evidencias científicas que ponen de manifiesto que el consumo de esta baya mejora la resistencia a insulina y mejora la percepción del sabor en pacientes oncológicos. El objetivo de esta revisión ha sido conocer los usos tan poco conocidos de esta fruta y su potencial médico (AU)


Synsepalum Dulicifum is atropicao shrub that produced a berry called miracle fruit, for its peculiarity to mask sour tastes, changing sweet tastes. Miracle fruits contains miraculin, a glycoprotein, which can cause sour food to taste sweet while it is tasteless. The sweet inducing activity of miracle fruit could be exploited for use in food, medicine and other industries as sweeteners or additives. It has valued its use as a natural sweetener, to produce foods low in simple sugars for diabetics and people with obesity. There are some scientific evidence show that berry consumption improves insulin resistance and improved flavor perception in cancer patients. The objective of this review was to determine the potential doctor so little known uses of this fruit (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Synsepalum , Sweetening Agents/therapeutic use , Trees , Food Composition , Monosaccharides , Nutritive Sweeteners/therapeutic use , Fatty Acids , Citric Acid/therapeutic use , Sucrose/therapeutic use , Freeze Drying
6.
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care ; 19(4): 310-5, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27168355

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Dietary sugars play a role in noncommunicable diseases and represent a clear target for reduction. In this context, product reformulation can have a positive impact on health. Several technological solutions are available to replace sugar, all with benefits and limitations. The goal of this review is to describe the main sugar replacement alternatives and discuss their impact on health and product physicochemical properties. RECENT FINDINGS: Although high intensity sweeteners and polyols have been used for a long time to replace sucrose and despite no clear evidence of harm, the trend is today to look for alternatives such as sweet enhancers or alternative sugars such as allulose or tagatose, which are both low caloric. To replace the physical properties of sugars, new trends are to substitute widely used maltodextrins by dietary fibres to confer added health benefits. SUMMARY: A wide range of solutions is currently available to replace dietary sugars and compensate for the impact on bulking properties and sweetness profile of food products.


Subject(s)
Food Technology , Non-Nutritive Sweeteners/therapeutic use , Nutritive Sweeteners/therapeutic use , Dietary Fiber/adverse effects , Dietary Fiber/therapeutic use , Food Preferences , Food Technology/trends , Glucose Metabolism Disorders/diet therapy , Glucose Metabolism Disorders/prevention & control , Humans , Non-Nutritive Sweeteners/adverse effects , Nutritive Sweeteners/adverse effects , Overweight/diet therapy , Overweight/prevention & control , Taste
7.
J Nutr ; 145(10): 2265-72, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26338891

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Public health recommendations call for a reduction in added sugars; however, controversy exists over whether all nutritive sweeteners produce similar metabolic effects. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the effects of the chronic consumption of 3 nutritive sweeteners [honey, sucrose, and high-fructose corn syrup containing 55% fructose (HFCS55)] on circulating glucose, insulin, lipids, and inflammatory markers; body weight; and blood pressure in individuals with normal glucose tolerance (GT) and those with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). METHODS: In a crossover design, participants consumed daily, in random order, 50 g carbohydrate from assigned sweeteners for 2 wk with a 2- to 4-wk washout period between treatments. Participants included 28 GT and 27 IGT volunteers with a mean age of 38.9 ± 3.6 y and 52.1 ± 2.7 y, respectively, and a body mass index (in kg/m(2)) of 26 ± 0.8 and 31.5 ± 1.0, respectively. Body weight, blood pressure (BP), serum inflammatory markers, lipids, fasting glucose and insulin, and oral-glucose-tolerance tests (OGTTs) were completed pre- and post-treatment. The OGTT incremental areas under the curve (iAUCs) for glucose and insulin were determined and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) scores were calculated. RESULTS: Body weight and serum glucose, insulin, inflammatory markers, and total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations were significantly higher in the IGT group than in the GT group at baseline. Glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and the OGTT iAUC for glucose or insulin did not differ by treatment, but all responses were significantly higher in the IGT group compared with the GT group. Body weight was unchanged by treatment. Systolic BP was unchanged, whereas diastolic BP was significantly lower in response to sugar intake across all treatments. An increase in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was observed in the IGT group in response to all sugars. No treatment effect was observed for interleukin 6. HDL cholesterol did not differ as a result of status or treatment. Triglyceride (TG) concentrations increased significantly from pre- to post-treatment in response to all sugars tested. CONCLUSIONS: Daily intake of 50 g carbohydrate from honey, sucrose, or HFCS55 for 14 d resulted in similar effects on measures of glycemia, lipid metabolism, and inflammation. All 3 increased TG concentrations in both GT and IGT individuals and elevated glycemic and inflammatory responses in the latter. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01371266.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/agonists , Dietary Sucrose/adverse effects , Glucose Intolerance/metabolism , High Fructose Corn Syrup/adverse effects , Honey/adverse effects , Insulin Resistance , Nutritive Sweeteners/adverse effects , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Body Mass Index , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Glucose Intolerance/complications , Glucose Intolerance/epidemiology , Glucose Intolerance/immunology , Humans , Hypertriglyceridemia/etiology , Hypertriglyceridemia/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , North Dakota/epidemiology , Nutritive Sweeteners/therapeutic use , Obesity/complications , Overweight/complications , Patient Dropouts , Risk Factors , Triglycerides/agonists , Triglycerides/blood
10.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 100(3): 765-77, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24944060

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Replacement of caloric sweeteners with lower- or no-calorie alternatives may facilitate weight loss or weight maintenance by helping to reduce energy intake; however, past research examining low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) and body weight has produced mixed results. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to systematically review and quantitatively evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies, separately, that examined the relation between LCSs and body weight and composition. DESIGN: A systematic literature search identified 15 RCTs and 9 prospective cohort studies that examined LCSs from foods or beverages or LCSs consumed as tabletop sweeteners. Meta-analyses generated weighted mean differences in body weight and composition values between the LCS and control groups among RCTs and weighted mean correlations for LCS intake and these parameters among prospective cohort studies. RESULTS: In RCTs, LCSs modestly but significantly reduced all outcomes examined, including body weight (-0.80 kg; 95% CI: -1.17, -0.43), body mass index [BMI (in kg/m²): -0.24; 95% CI: -0.41, -0.07], fat mass (-1.10 kg; 95% CI: -1.77, -0.44), and waist circumference (-0.83 cm; 95% CI: -1.29, -0.37). Among prospective cohort studies, LCS intake was not associated with body weight or fat mass, but was significantly associated with slightly higher BMI (0.03; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis provides a rigorous evaluation of the scientific evidence on LCSs and body weight and composition. Findings from observational studies showed no association between LCS intake and body weight or fat mass and a small positive association with BMI; however, data from RCTs, which provide the highest quality of evidence for examining the potentially causal effects of LCS intake, indicate that substituting LCS options for their regular-calorie versions results in a modest weight loss and may be a useful dietary tool to improve compliance with weight loss or weight maintenance plans.


Subject(s)
Diet, Reducing , Evidence-Based Medicine , Non-Nutritive Sweeteners/therapeutic use , Nutritive Sweeteners/therapeutic use , Overweight/diet therapy , Adiposity , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Energy Intake , Humans , Non-Nutritive Sweeteners/adverse effects , Nutritive Sweeteners/adverse effects , Overweight/prevention & control , Patient Compliance , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recurrence , Reproducibility of Results , Weight Loss
11.
J Sci Food Agric ; 94(5): 969-74, 2014 Mar 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24757723

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The production of xylitol from lignocellulosic material is of great interest around the world. It can be used as bulk sweetener and its possible lower energy value has increased acceptance for discerning consumers. Xylitol was produced from indigenous agricultural by-product (mung bean hulls) through Candida tropicalis fermentation. Further, xylitol incorporation at different concentrations (0, 100 and 200 g kg⁻¹) was carried out with the purpose of appraising the suitability and claimed health benefits of this dietetic ingredient in food products. Asserted biochemical perspectives of the xylitol intake were evaluated through biological studies for normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. RESULTS: The addition of xylitol significantly affected feed intake, weight gain, liver and cecum weight in both normal and diabetic rats. The biochemical profile of serum was improved with xylitol incorporation in the diet. Serum glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides levels were decreased depending on xylitol intake level. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study demonstrated that mung bean hulls have high potential as a new feedstock for xylitol production. In addressing the current concerns of obesity and diabetes, xylitol extracted from such agricultural waste should be considered in diet-based therapies for weight loss programmes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/diet therapy , Fabaceae/chemistry , Industrial Waste/analysis , Nutritive Sweeteners/therapeutic use , Plant Epidermis/chemistry , Seeds/chemistry , Xylitol/therapeutic use , Animals , Candida tropicalis/metabolism , Cecum/pathology , Crops, Agricultural/chemistry , Crops, Agricultural/economics , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/pathology , Diet, Diabetic/economics , Diet, Reducing/economics , Fabaceae/economics , Fermentation , Food-Processing Industry/economics , Hyperglycemia/prevention & control , Industrial Waste/economics , Liver/pathology , Nutritive Sweeteners/adverse effects , Nutritive Sweeteners/economics , Nutritive Sweeteners/metabolism , Organ Size , Pakistan , Random Allocation , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Weight Gain , Xylitol/adverse effects , Xylitol/economics , Xylitol/metabolism
12.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 23(8): 931-40, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23089076

ABSTRACT

Patients meeting criteria for the risk syndrome for psychosis have treatment needs including positive and negative symptoms and cognitive impairment. These features could potentially respond to NMDA glycine-site agonists. The present objective was to determine which symptoms or domains of cognition promise to show the greatest response to glycine in risk syndrome patients. We conducted two short-term pilot studies of glycine used without adjunctive antipsychotic medication. In the first trial, 10 risk syndrome subjects received open-label glycine at doses titrated to 0.8 g/kg/d for 8 weeks, followed by discontinuation and 16 weeks of evaluation for durability of effects. In the second, 8 subjects were randomized to double-blind glycine vs. placebo for 12 weeks, followed by open-label glycine for another 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated every 1-2 weeks with the Scale Of Psychosis-risk Symptoms (SOPS) and before and after treatment with a neurocognitive battery. Within-group and between-group effect sizes were calculated. Effect sizes were large for positive (open-label within-group -1.10, double-blind between-group -1.11) and total (-1.39 and -1.15) symptoms and medium-to-large (-0.74 and -0.79) for negative symptoms. Medium or large effect sizes were also observed for several neurocognitive measures in the open-label study, although data were sparse. No safety concerns were identified. We conclude that glycine was associated with reduced symptoms with promising effect sizes in two pilot studies and a possibility of improvement in cognitive function. Further studies of agents that facilitate NMDA receptor function in risk syndrome patients are supported by these preliminary findings.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Glycine Agents/therapeutic use , Glycine/therapeutic use , Psychotic Disorders/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adolescent Behavior , Adult , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/prevention & control , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glycine/adverse effects , Glycine Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Nutritive Sweeteners/adverse effects , Nutritive Sweeteners/therapeutic use , Pilot Projects , Prodromal Symptoms , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/physiopathology , Risk , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...