Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.643
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12702, 2024 06 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830982

ABSTRACT

This paper analyzes the determinants of COVID-19 mortality across over 140 countries in 2020, with a focus on healthcare expenditure and corruption. It finds a positive association between COVID-19 deaths and aging populations, obesity rates, and healthcare expenditure while noting a negative association with rural residency and corruption perception. The study further reveals that mortality is positively associated with aging populations in high-income countries and positively associated with obesity in upper-middle to high-income countries. Mortality is positively associated with healthcare expenditure, which likely reflects a country's preparedness and ability to better track, document, and report COVID-19 deaths. On the other hand, mortality is negatively associated with corruption perception in upper-middle-income countries. Further analyses based on 2021 data reveal COVID-19 deaths are positively associated with the proportion of the population aged 65 and older in low to lower-middle-income countries, with obesity in high-income countries, and with tobacco use across most countries. Interestingly, there is no evidence linking COVID-19 deaths to healthcare expenditure and corruption perception, suggesting a post-2020 convergence in preparedness likely due to proactive pandemic responses, which might have also mitigated corruption's impact. Policy recommendations are proposed to aid the elderly, address obesity, and combat tobacco use.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Expenditures , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/economics , Humans , Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Obesity/mortality , Obesity/economics , Pandemics/economics
2.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 28(9): 3365-3374, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766793

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Obesity presents an enduring and multifaceted dilemma that impacts individuals, society, economies, and healthcare systems alike. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, including liraglutide and semaglutide, have received FDA approval for obesity treatment. This study aims to present a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the cost and clinical outcomes of semaglutide vs. liraglutide on weight loss in people with overweight and obesity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare the cost and the clinical outcomes of adding weekly 2.4 mg SC semaglutide vs. daily 3.0 mg SC liraglutide or placebo to physical activity and diet control in overweight and obese patients. A clinical outcome of achieving ≥15% weight loss was chosen. A simple decision analysis model from a third-payer perspective was applied. Drug costs were based on the retail price of the USA market. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Results showed that 2.4 mg weekly semaglutide, when added to physical activity and diet control, was the most cost-effective choice in terms of ≥15% weight loss (ICER: $ 7,056/patient/68 weeks). The model was robust against the 50% increase in the unit cost of semaglutide and the 50% decrease in the unit cost of liraglutide, as well as the changes in probabilities by the corresponding 95% confidence intervals across the model. CONCLUSIONS: This cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that employing once-weekly 2.4 mg semaglutide emerges as a remarkably cost-effective option when contrasted with once-daily 3.0 mg liraglutide in patients with overweight and obesity when added to physical activity and diet control.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Glucagon-Like Peptides , Liraglutide , Obesity , Overweight , Humans , Glucagon-Like Peptides/economics , Glucagon-Like Peptides/administration & dosage , Glucagon-Like Peptides/therapeutic use , Liraglutide/administration & dosage , Liraglutide/economics , Liraglutide/therapeutic use , Obesity/drug therapy , Obesity/economics , Overweight/drug therapy , Overweight/economics , Injections, Subcutaneous , Decision Support Techniques , Weight Loss/drug effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Anti-Obesity Agents/economics , Anti-Obesity Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/economics , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
3.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e080166, 2024 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740501

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: As nearly two-thirds of women presenting at their first antenatal visit are either overweight or obese in urban South Africa, the preconception period is an opportunity to optimise health and offset transgenerational risk of both obesity and non-communicable diseases. This protocol describes the planned economic evaluation of an individually randomised controlled trial of a complex continuum of care intervention targeting women and children in Soweto, South Africa (Bukhali trial). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The economic evaluation of the Bukhali trial will be conducted as a within-trial analysis from both provider and societal perspectives. Incremental costs and health outcomes of the continuum of care intervention will be compared with standard care. The economic impact on implementing agencies (programme costs), healthcare providers, participants and their households will be estimated. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) will be calculated in terms of cost per case of child adiposity at age years averted. Additionally, ICERs will also be reported in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life year gained. If Bukhali demonstrates effectiveness, we will employ a decision analytical model to examine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention over a child's lifetime. A Markov model will be used to estimate long-term health benefits, healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses will be conducted to explore uncertainty and ensure robust results. An analysis will be conducted to assess the equity impact of the intervention, by comparing intervention impact within quintiles of socioeconomic status. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Bukhali trial economic evaluation has ethical approval from the Human Ethics Research Committee of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa (M240162). The results of the economic evaluation will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant international conference. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR201903750173871; https://pactr.samrc.ac.za).


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Continuity of Patient Care/economics , Obesity/therapy , Obesity/economics , Pediatric Obesity/therapy , Pediatric Obesity/economics , Prenatal Care/economics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , South Africa
4.
J Law Med Ethics ; 52(1): 188-190, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38818585

ABSTRACT

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are effective for treating obesity, but the high cost of these medications endangers the financial viability of our health care system. To ensure that these drugs are available to Medicare beneficiaries, pharmaceutical manufacturers must lower their prices.


Subject(s)
Anti-Obesity Agents , Drug Costs , Medicare , United States , Humans , Anti-Obesity Agents/economics , Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Medicare/economics , Obesity/drug therapy , Obesity/economics , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor/agonists , Insurance Coverage/economics
5.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1380690, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721535

ABSTRACT

Background: Obesity has been extensively studied over the years, primarily focusing on the physiological aspects of the disease. However, the general burden of obesity mainly the financial implications and its influence on hospitalization and length of stay have only recently garnered attention in the literature, particularly in the case of Portugal. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the association between obesity and hospitalizations in the Portuguese adult population and compare the average costs of hospitalization among participants with and without obesity. Methods: At baseline, the analytic sample consisted of 10,102 participants aged ≥18 years from the Portuguese population-based Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases Cohort (EpiDoC). Participants were then followed for up to 10 years from 2011 to 2021 in three more waves of data collection. Body mass index was derived from self-reported weight and height, and instances of hospitalization were self-reported by the participants. The associated costs for each hospitalization episode were categorized according to national legislation and valued according to the pricing for Diagnosis Related Groups. Results: Obesity was associated with more hospitalizations (for example, Obesity class I vs. normal weight: OR = 1.33 [1.14-1.55]). However, when the presence of multimorbidity was considered, this association diminished. While longer hospital length of stay was observed in individuals with higher obesity categories, this difference did not reach statistical significance. On average, the total hospitalization costs per patient with obesity amounted to €200.4 per year. Conclusion: Obesity is as a risk factor for hospitalizations and potentially with higher length of stay hospitalizations, with this effect being partially mediated by the concurrent presence of multimorbidity. Consequently, obesity constitutes an additional burden on healthcare systems. This underscores the imperative of implementing cost-effective prevention programs aimed at addressing and managing this significant public health concern.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Obesity , Humans , Portugal/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Cohort Studies , Adolescent , Young Adult , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data
6.
Health Policy ; 144: 105076, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692186

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Economic evaluations of public health interventions like sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes face difficulties similar to those previously identified in other public health areas. This stems from challenges in accurately attributing effects, capturing outcomes and costs beyond health, and integrating equity effects. This review examines how these challenges were addressed in economic evaluations of SSB taxes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify economic evaluations of SSB taxes focused on addressing obesity in adults, published up to February 2021. The methodological challenges examined include measuring effects, valuing outcomes, assessing costs, and incorporating equity. RESULTS: Fourteen economic evaluations of SSB taxes were identified. Across these evaluations, estimating SSB tax effects was uncertain due to a reliance on indirect evidence that was less robust than evidence from randomised controlled trials. Health outcomes, like quality-adjusted life years, along with a healthcare system perspective for costs, dominated the evaluations of SSB taxes, with a limited focus on broader non-health consequences. Equity analyses were common but employed significantly different approaches and exhibited varying degrees of quality. CONCLUSION: Addressing the methodological challenges remains an issue for economic evaluations of public health interventions like SSB taxes, suggesting the need for increased attention on those issues in future studies. Dedicated methodological guidelines, in particular addressing the measurement of effect and incorporation of equity impacts, are warranted.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Obesity , Sugar-Sweetened Beverages , Taxes , Taxes/economics , Humans , Sugar-Sweetened Beverages/economics , Obesity/economics , Public Health/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
7.
Obes Res Clin Pract ; 18(2): 88-93, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38565463

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of overweight and obesity among military personnel has increased substantially in the past two decades. Following military discharge many personnel can receive integrated health care from the Veterans Health Administration. Prior research related to the economic impacts of obesity has not examined health care costs following the transition into civilian life following military discharge. To address this evidence gap, this study sought to compare longitudinal costs over 10 years across weight categories among VA enrollees recently discharged from the military.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Military Personnel , Obesity , Humans , Female , Male , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , United States , Adult , Middle Aged , Obesity/economics , Obesity/epidemiology , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Longitudinal Studies , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge , Overweight/economics , Overweight/epidemiology
8.
Econ Hum Biol ; 53: 101366, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38354596

ABSTRACT

We use longitudinal electronic clinical data on a large representative sample of the Italian population to estimate the lifetime profile costs of different BMI classes - normal weight, overweight, and obese (I, II, and III) - in a primary care setting. Our research reveals that obese patients generate the highest cost differential throughout their lives compared to normal weight patients. Moreover, we show that overweight individuals spend less than those with normal weight, primarily due to reduced expenditures beginning in early middle age. Our estimates could serve as a vital benchmark for policymakers looking to prioritize public interventions that address the obesity pandemic while considering the increasing obesity rates projected by the OECD until 2030.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Obesity , Overweight , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/economics , Middle Aged , Female , Male , Overweight/epidemiology , Overweight/economics , Adult , Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Longitudinal Studies , Cost of Illness , Child , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/economics
9.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 48(5): 683-693, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38291203

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of weight-management pharmacotherapies approved by Canada Health, i.e., orlistat, naltrexone 32 mg/bupropion 360 mg (NB-32), liraglutide 3.0 mg and semaglutide 2.4 mg as compared to the current standard of care (SoC). METHODS: Analyses were conducted using a cohort with a mean starting age 50 years, body mass index (BMI) 37.5 kg/m2, and 27.6% having type 2 diabetes. Using treatment-specific changes in surrogate endpoints from the STEP trials (BMI, glycemic, blood pressure, lipids), besides a network meta-analysis, the occurrence of weight-related complications, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were projected over lifetime. RESULTS: From a societal perspective, at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CAD 50 000 per QALY, semaglutide 2.4 mg was the most cost-effective treatment, at an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of CAD 31 243 and CAD 29 014 per QALY gained versus the next best alternative, i.e., orlistat, and SoC, respectively. Semaglutide 2.4 mg extendedly dominated other pharmacotherapies such as NB-32 or liraglutide 3.0 mg and remained cost-effective both under a public and private payer perspective. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses varying post-treatment catch-up rates, longer treatment durations and using real-world cohort characteristics. Semaglutide 2.4 mg was the preferred intervention, with a likelihood of 70% at a WTP threshold of CAD 50 000 per QALY gained. However, when the modeled benefits of weight-loss on cancer, mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD) or osteoarthritis surgeries were removed simultaneously, orlistat emerged as the best value for money compared with SoC, with an ICUR of CAD 35 723 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: Semaglutide 2.4 mg was the most cost-effective treatment alternative compared with D&E or orlistat alone, and extendedly dominated other pharmacotherapies such as NB-32 or liraglutide 3.0 mg. Results were sensitive to the inclusion of the combined benefits of mortality, cancer, CVD, and knee osteoarthritis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Obesity Agents , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Obesity , Orlistat , Humans , Canada , Middle Aged , Obesity/drug therapy , Obesity/economics , Female , Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Obesity Agents/economics , Male , Orlistat/therapeutic use , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Liraglutide/therapeutic use , Liraglutide/economics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/economics , Bupropion/therapeutic use , Bupropion/economics , Naltrexone/therapeutic use , Naltrexone/economics , Glucagon-Like Peptides/therapeutic use , Glucagon-Like Peptides/economics
10.
Obes Facts ; 16(6): 606-613, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37879296

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Overweight and obesity result in a substantial economic burden in both low- and high-income countries. Moreover, this burden is often underestimated because it only partially accounts for unreimbursed out-of-pocket expenses (OOPE) related to obesity. The objective of our study was not only to evaluate OOPE incurred by people with obesity in relation to their disease with respect to direct medical expenditures and direct non-medical expenditures but also the proportion of people living with obesity who have forgone obesity-related healthcare due to the costs of such care. METHODS: An observational descriptive survey was conducted among people with class II/III obesity attending six obesity treatment centers in France. Volunteer adult participants completed a written/phone questionnaire on their related expenditures over the last 6 months for current expenditures and over the last 5 years for occasional ones. The costs were expressed in 2022 EUR. RESULTS: 299 people participated (age: 46 years [SD: 13.9], women: 72%, BMI ≥40 kg/m2: 62% and 48% with comorbidities). 65% had a professional activity. 83% declared that they had OOPE related to obesity representing annually EUR 2027/individual on average (5% of the household revenue), including weight loss and nutritional products, vitamins, meal programs, gym memberships, psychologists, but mainly adapted clothing, additional travel costs, and others. 15% of the respondents had to modify their professional activity due to obesity and 15% forwent some medical care in the last 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: OOPE is a significant part of the economic burden of obesity. Despite some limitations due to the specificities of the participants and because some costs may be more related to social activities affected by obesity than to healthcare, it seems important to consider these expenditures in cost estimates for obesity.


Subject(s)
Health Expenditures , Obesity , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Income , Obesity/economics , Obesity/epidemiology , Overweight/economics , Overweight/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , France/epidemiology
11.
Rev. esp. nutr. comunitaria ; 29(2): 1-12, 30/06/2023. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-223675

ABSTRACT

Fundamentos: los resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de Situación Nutricional (ENSIN) de los últimos 15 años muestran un marcado aumento en el exceso de peso en adultos. En 2015, el 59,6% de las mujeres entre 18 y 64 años presentó exceso de peso. El objetivo fue analizar la situación de seguridad alimentaria y nutricional (SAN) en un grupo de hogares del municipio de Girardot - Cundinamarca, a partir del referencial de los determinantes sociales de la SAN y la equidad social. Métodos: estudio cuantitativo transversal analítico realizado entre 2019 y 2020. Se realizó recolección de variables sociodemográficas, inseguridad alimentaria en el hogar (INSAH), estrategias de afrontamiento de ésta y frecuencia de consumo de alimentos mediante 4 instrumentos tipo encuesta en 20 mujeres adultas con exceso de peso residentes en Girardot (Colombia) de hogares urbanos de los estratos 1 y 2. Resultados: se encontró asociación estadísticamente significativa entre la decisión de uso de los ingresos económicos y la estrategia de afrontamiento número 2, clasificadas como determinantes intermedios y la INSAH. Conclusiones: se identificaron la composición del hogar, el nivel educativo del jefe de hogar, la decisión de uso del dinero del hogar, entre otros, como determinantes sociales que agudizan las inequidades en la situación alimentaria y nutricional de los hogares estudiados. (AU)


Background: According to the National Survey of the Nutritional Situation (ENSIN) results, during the last 15 years the obesity in adults has been sharply increasing. In fact, 59,6% of women between 18 and 64 years old were overweight in 2015. The objective was to analyze the Food and Nutrition Security Situation (SAN) within urban households in Girardot - Cundinamarca, based on the social determinants of SAN and social equality Methods: Analytical cross-sectional quantitative study. This paper used a data collection system of background variables, such as food insecurity (INSAH), the coping strategies used by the INSAH and the eating frequency, all this information was collected by interviewing the people using 4 different types of polls. Results: Analytical cross-sectional quantitative study. This paper used a data collection system of background variables, such as food insecurity, the coping strategies used by the INSAH and the eating frequency, all this information was collected by interviewing the people using 4 different types of polls. Conclusions: It was identified the nuclear family composition, the head of the household educational level, the use of money decisions at home among others. As social determinants that contribute to intensifying the inequality in the food and nutritional status in the households of study. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Overweight/economics , Obesity/economics , Food Supply , Social Determinants of Health , Equity , Colombia
12.
Nutrients ; 13(12)2021 Nov 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34959745

ABSTRACT

A large amount of waste is generated within the different steps of the food supply chain, representing a significant loss of natural resources, plant material, and economic value for producers and consumers. During harvesting and processing, many parts of edible plants are not sold for consumption and end up as massive waste, adding environmental hazards to the list of concerns regarding food wastage. Examples are Brassica oleracea var. Italica (broccoli) by-products, which represent 75% of the plant mass. A growing concern in the Western world is obesity, which results from incorrect lifestyles and comprises an extensive array of co-morbidities. Several studies have linked these co-morbidities to increased oxidative stress; thus, naturally occurring and readily available antioxidant compounds are an attractive way to mitigate metabolic diseases. The idea of by-products selected for their biomedical value is not novel. However, there is innovation underlying the use of Brassica by-products in the context of obesity. For this reason, Brassica by-products are prime candidates to be used in the treatment of obesity due to its bioactive compounds, such as sulforaphane, which possess antioxidant activity. Here, we review the economic and health potential of Brassica bioactive compounds in the context of obesity.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/pharmacology , Brassica/chemistry , Obesity/metabolism , Phytochemicals/pharmacology , Waste Products , Antioxidants/economics , Brassica/economics , Humans , Obesity/diet therapy , Obesity/economics , Phytochemicals/economics , Waste Products/economics
13.
Multimedia | Multimedia Resources | ID: multimedia-9401

ABSTRACT

Estratégias de Prevenção e Controle da Obesidade na Atenção primária da saúde durante a pandemia de COVID-19 no Brasil.


Subject(s)
Obesity/complications , COVID-19/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Primary Health Care , Obesity Management , Obesity/economics , Overweight/prevention & control , Social Stigma , Obesity/prevention & control , Food Guide , Brazil/epidemiology , Humanization of Assistance , Nutrition Policy
15.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(10): e0009825, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34597323

ABSTRACT

Toxoplasmosis gondii exposure has been linked to increased impulsivity and risky behaviors, which has implications for eating behavior. Impulsivity and risk tolerance is known to be related with worse diets and a higher chance of obesity. There is little known, however, about the independent link between Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) exposure and diet-related outcomes. Using linear and quantile regression, we estimated the relationship between T. gondii exposure and BMI, total energy intake (kcal), and diet quality as measured by the Health Eating Index-2015 (HEI) among 9,853 adults from the 2009-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Previous studies have shown different behavioral responses to T. gondii infection among males and females, and socioeconomic factors are also likely to be important as both T. gondii and poor diet are more prevalent among U.S. populations in poverty. We therefore measured the associations between T. gondii and diet-related outcomes separately for men and women and for respondents in poverty. Among females <200% of the federal poverty level Toxoplasmosis gondii exposure was associated with a higher BMI by 2.0 units (95% CI [0.22, 3.83]) at median BMI and a lower HEI by 5.05 units (95% CI [-7.87, -2.24]) at the 25th percentile of HEI. Stronger associations were found at higher levels of BMI and worse diet quality among females. No associations were found among males. Through a detailed investigation of mechanisms, we were able to rule out T. gondii exposure from cat ownership, differing amounts of meat, and drinking water source as potential confounding factors; environmental exposure to T. gondii as well as changes in human behavior due to parasitic infection remain primary mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Obesity/parasitology , Toxoplasmosis/physiopathology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diet , Female , Humans , Male , Nutrition Surveys , Obesity/economics , Obesity/metabolism , Obesity/physiopathology , Poverty , Toxoplasma/genetics , Toxoplasma/isolation & purification , Toxoplasmosis/economics , Toxoplasmosis/metabolism , Toxoplasmosis/parasitology , Young Adult
16.
PLoS Med ; 18(8): e1003725, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34449774

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity has increased in the United Kingdom, and reliably measuring the impact on quality of life and the total healthcare cost from obesity is key to informing the cost-effectiveness of interventions that target obesity, and determining healthcare funding. Current methods for estimating cost-effectiveness of interventions for obesity may be subject to confounding and reverse causation. The aim of this study is to apply a new approach using mendelian randomisation for estimating the cost-effectiveness of interventions that target body mass index (BMI), which may be less affected by confounding and reverse causation than previous approaches. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We estimated health-related quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and both primary and secondary healthcare costs for 310,913 men and women of white British ancestry aged between 39 and 72 years in UK Biobank between recruitment (2006 to 2010) and 31 March 2017. We then estimated the causal effect of differences in BMI on QALYs and total healthcare costs using mendelian randomisation. For this, we used instrumental variable regression with a polygenic risk score (PRS) for BMI, derived using a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of BMI, with age, sex, recruitment centre, and 40 genetic principal components as covariables to estimate the effect of a unit increase in BMI on QALYs and total healthcare costs. Finally, we used simulations to estimate the likely effect on BMI of policy relevant interventions for BMI, then used the mendelian randomisation estimates to estimate the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. A unit increase in BMI decreased QALYs by 0.65% of a QALY (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49% to 0.81%) per year and increased annual total healthcare costs by £42.23 (95% CI: £32.95 to £51.51) per person. When considering only health conditions usually considered in previous cost-effectiveness modelling studies (cancer, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes), we estimated that a unit increase in BMI decreased QALYs by only 0.16% of a QALY (95% CI: 0.10% to 0.22%) per year. We estimated that both laparoscopic bariatric surgery among individuals with BMI greater than 35 kg/m2, and restricting volume promotions for high fat, salt, and sugar products, would increase QALYs and decrease total healthcare costs, with net monetary benefits (at £20,000 per QALY) of £13,936 (95% CI: £8,112 to £20,658) per person over 20 years, and £546 million (95% CI: £435 million to £671 million) in total per year, respectively. The main limitations of this approach are that mendelian randomisation relies on assumptions that cannot be proven, including the absence of directional pleiotropy, and that genotypes are independent of confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Mendelian randomisation can be used to estimate the impact of interventions on quality of life and healthcare costs. We observed that the effect of increasing BMI on health-related quality of life is much larger when accounting for 240 chronic health conditions, compared with only a limited selection. This means that previous cost-effectiveness studies have likely underestimated the effect of BMI on quality of life and, therefore, the potential cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce BMI.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Obesity/prevention & control , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/economics , Primary Health Care/economics , Secondary Care/economics
17.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(7): e2116256, 2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34241628

ABSTRACT

Importance: Gamification is increasingly being used for health promotion but has not been well tested with financial incentives or among veterans. Objective: To test the effectiveness of gamification with social support, with and without a loss-framed financial incentive, to increase physical activity among veterans classified as having overweight and obesity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 3-group randomized clinical trial had a 12-week intervention period and an 8-week follow-up period. Participants included veterans with a body mass index greater than or equal to 25 who were receiving care from a single site in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Participants underwent a remotely monitored intervention from March 19, 2019, to August 9, 2020. Data analyses were conducted between October 1, 2020, and November 14, 2020. Interventions: All participants received a wearable device to track step counts and selected a step goal. The control group received feedback from their devices only. Participants in the 2 gamification groups were entered into a 12-week game with points and levels designed using behavioral economic principles and selected a support partner to receive weekly updates. Participants in the loss-framed financial incentive group had $120 allocated to a virtual account and lost $10 if weekly goals were not achieved. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in mean daily steps from baseline during the intervention. Secondary outcomes include proportion of days goals were achieved and changes during follow-up. Results: A total of 180 participants were randomized, 60 to the gamification with social support group, 60 to the gamification with social support and loss-framed financial incentives group, and 60 to the control group. The participants had a mean (SD) age of 56.5 (12.9) years and a mean (SD) body mass index of 33.0 (5.6); 71 participants (39.4%) were women, 90 (50.0%) were White, and 67 (37.2%) were Black. During the intervention period, compared with control group participants, participants in the gamification with financial incentives group had a significant increase in mean daily steps from baseline (adjusted difference, 1224 steps; 95% CI, 451 to 1996 steps; P = .005), but participants in the gamification without financial incentives group did not (adjusted difference, 433 steps; 95% CI, -337 to 1203 steps; P = .81). The increase for the gamification with financial incentives group was not sustained during the follow-up period, and the step count was not significantly different than that of the control group (adjusted difference, 564 steps; 95% CI, -261 to 1389 steps; P = .37). Compared with the control group, participants in the intervention groups had a significantly higher adjusted proportion of days meeting their step goal during the main intervention and follow-up period (gamification with social support group, adjusted difference from control, 0.21 participant-day; 95% CI, 0.18-0.24 participant-day; P < .001; gamification with social support and loss-framed financial incentive group, adjusted difference from control, 0.34 participant-day; 95% CI, 0.31-0.37 participant-day; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Among veterans classified as having overweight and obesity, gamification with social support combined with loss-framed financial incentives was associated with a modest increase in physical activity during the intervention period, but the increase was not sustained during follow-up. Gamification without incentives did not significantly change physical activity. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03563027.


Subject(s)
Exercise/standards , Gamification , Motivation , Veterans/psychology , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Exercise/psychology , Exercise/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/economics , Obesity/psychology , Obesity/therapy , Overweight/economics , Overweight/psychology , Overweight/therapy , Philadelphia , Social Support , Veterans/statistics & numerical data
18.
Br J Surg ; 108(5): 554-565, 2021 05 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34043776

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery can be effective in weight reduction and diabetes remission in some patients, but is expensive. The costs of bariatric surgery in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were explored here. METHODS: Population-based retrospectively gathered data on patients with obesity and T2DM from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority (2006-2017) were evaluated. Direct medical costs from baseline up to 60 months were calculated based on the frequency of healthcare service utilization and dispensing of diabetes medication. Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) scores and co-morbidity rates were measured to compare changes in co-morbidities between surgically treated and control groups over 5 years. One-to-five propensity score matching was applied. RESULTS: Overall, 401 eligible surgical patients were matched with 1894 non-surgical patients. Direct medical costs were much higher for surgical than non-surgical patients in the index year (€36 752 and €5788 respectively; P < 0·001) mainly owing to the bariatric procedure. The 5-year cumulative costs incurred by surgical patients were also higher (€54 135 versus €28 603; P < 0·001). Although patients who had bariatric surgery had more visits to outpatient and allied health professionals than those who did not across the 5-year period, surgical patients had shorter length of stay in hospitals than non-surgical patients in year 2-5. Surgical patients had significantly better CCI scores than controls after the baseline measurement (mean 3·82 versus 4·38 at 5 years; P = 0·016). Costs of glucose-lowering medications were similar between two groups, except that surgical patients had significantly lower costs of glucose-lowering medications in year 2 (€973 versus €1395; P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery in obese patients with T2DM is expensive, but leads to an improved co-morbidity profile, and reduced length of hospitalization.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/economics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Obesity/economics , Ambulatory Care/economics , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/economics , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/surgery , Office Visits/economics , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies
20.
Nutrients ; 13(4)2021 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33804858

ABSTRACT

Obesity and other diet-related health conditions have received much attention in the public health literature over the past two decades. This study investigates the relationship between household food budget shares at different food outlets with diet quality and weight-related health outcomes in the United States. Our analysis used event-level food purchase data from the national household food acquisition and purchases survey (FoodAPS). We find that, after controlling for observables, food purchase location is significantly associated with diet quality and body mass index (BMI). Our findings indicate that larger food budget shares at convenience stores and restaurants are linked with poor diet quality based on the healthy eating index-2015 (HEI-2015) scores and higher BMI. We further explored potential heterogeneity on outcomes of interest across income groups. Results suggest heterogeneous effects may exist across income groups: low-income households, who spent a larger share of their food budget at convenience stores and fast-food restaurants are related to poor diet quality and more likely to be obese. Our findings will help improve understanding of the causes of diet-related health problems and may illuminate potential avenues of intervention to address obesity.


Subject(s)
Commerce/economics , Consumer Behavior/economics , Diet/economics , Diet/methods , Income/statistics & numerical data , Obesity/epidemiology , Body Mass Index , Child, Preschool , Commerce/statistics & numerical data , Consumer Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/economics , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...