Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Rio de Janeiro; Medyn; 2015. 100 p. graf, ilus, tab.(MedCurso 2015, 5).
Monography in Portuguese | Sec. Munic. Saúde SP, AHM-Acervo, TATUAPE-Acervo | ID: sms-12350
2.
Rio de Janeiro; Medyn; 2015. 100 p. graf, ilus, tab.(MedCurso 2015, 5).
Monography in Portuguese | LILACS, AHM-Acervo, TATUAPE-Acervo | ID: biblio-971690
4.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 33(12): 980-5, 2005 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16321560

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Obstetrical forceps are used worldwide since more than 400 years. In 2003 forceps deliveries accounted for 6.3% of all deliveries of the AURORE Grand-Lyon perinatal network. Although more than 400 different forceps have been described, obstetrics handbooks neither describe experimental forceps nor provide any chapter dedicated to instrumental delivery training. Our aim was to provide junior obstetricians with information that will allow them to select the best instrument and to let them know about experimental as well as pedagogic forceps. PATIENTS AND METHODS: International literature review using the terms "forceps" and "delivery" and a four year experimental work involving a close collaboration between obstetricians and biomechanics of the INSA engineering school. RESULTS: Two instruments are presented as well as a new forceps classification. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This classification distinguishes between three types of forceps: operational forceps designed to delivers neonates, experimental forceps designed to study biomechanics and training forceps designed for resident training. For the first time the classic blind forceps procedure is transformed in a full screen real time procedure.


Subject(s)
Extraction, Obstetrical/standards , Obstetrical Forceps/classification , Obstetrical Forceps/trends , Obstetrics/education , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Cienc. ginecol ; 9(3): 118-123, mayo-jun. 2005.
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-037552

ABSTRACT

El fórceps es un instrumento cuya historia se ha caracterizado por cambios y modificaciones periódicas tanto en su diseño y construcción como en sus indicaciones y técnica de aplicación. En este trabajo se revisan a la luz de los actuales conocimientos, las funciones, indicaciones, condiciones y contraindicaciones para la realización de los fórceps. Igualmente se repasa someramente la técnica para su realización y las complicaciones que pueden derivarse de su uso


Many different types of forceps have been described and developed throughout time. Here we review the role of forceps delivery in modern obstetric practice, functions, indications, contraindications, maternal and fetal morbidity, and application technique


Subject(s)
Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Parturition/physiology , Labor, Obstetric/history , Labor, Obstetric/physiology , Obstetrical Forceps , Obstetrical Forceps/history , Hemorrhage/complications , Obstetrical Forceps/classification , Obstetrical Forceps/standards , Obstetrical Forceps , Delivery, Obstetric , Delivery, Obstetric , Postpartum Hemorrhage/complications , Obstetric Labor Complications/diagnosis
6.
Semin Perinatol ; 27(1): 112-20, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12641307

ABSTRACT

Forceps delivery remains an important part of the obstetric armamentarium. When applied by practitioners skilled in their use, forceps delivery can quickly and safely deliver a fetus at risk. Unfortunately, forceps can also be an instrument of harm for the women or her infant. This is particularly true of rotational forceps. The goal of this monograph is to review in detail the indications, contraindications, technique, as well as risks and complications of forceps delivery, with particular attention to rotational forceps. We conclude by asking the question: Should rotational forceps be abandoned altogether?


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Obstetrical Forceps , Version, Fetal , Female , Humans , Obstetrical Forceps/adverse effects , Obstetrical Forceps/classification , Perineum/injuries , Pregnancy , Risk Factors
8.
Prog. obstet. ginecol. (Ed. impr.) ; 43(12): 607-611, dic. 2000. tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-4524

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Valorar si la analgesia epidural en el parto produce un aumento de partos instrumentales y de cesáreas. Sujetos y métodos: Todas las gestantes que dieron a luz en el hospital de León durante el año 1997, que no había analgesia epidural y el año 1999 que era a petición de la paciente, con un 62 por ciento de utilización. Se compara el tipo de parto entre el total de gestantes y en el subgrupo de primíparas. Resultados: En 1997 hubo 221 partos instrumentales, sin embargo en 1999 fueron 408 (11,2 por ciento frente al 21,9 por ciento), con una significación estadística p < 0,001. En el subgrupo de primíparas varía desde el 15,9 por ciento (año que no había analgesia epidural) al 29,6 por ciento, con una significación estadística p < 0,001. La tasa de cesáreas permanece igual en ambos grupos. Conclusiones: Hay un aumento estadísticamente significativo de partos instrumentales el año que se oferta la analgesia epidural, pero la tasa de cesáreas no varía (AU)


Subject(s)
Adult , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Cesarean Section/instrumentation , Parturition/classification , Parturition/instrumentation , Obstetrical Forceps , Obstetrical Forceps/classification , Obstetrical Forceps/statistics & numerical data , Predictive Value of Tests , Analgesia, Epidural/statistics & numerical data , Analgesia, Epidural/standards , Analgesia, Epidural/trends , Fentanyl/administration & dosage
9.
Clín. investig. ginecol. obstet. (Ed. impr.) ; 27(4): 117-122, abr. 2000. tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-20928

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El Centro Latinoamericano de Perinatología (CLAP) hace 11 años propuso el uso de la curva de Alerta, instrumento que facilita la rápida evaluación de la marcha del parto, con inestimable valor docente y de supervisión de cada caso particular. Objetivo: Analizar la utilidad clínica del uso de la Curva de Alerta en nuestra Institución, siguiendo las consignas del Parto Respetuoso con la Madre. Pacientes y método: Se confeccionó una Curva de Alerta con las instrucciones impartidas por sus autores a cada paciente que ingresó a nuestro Servicio, siguiendo los criterios de vigilancia y uso racional de medicamentos entre abril de 1997 a diciembre de 1998. Durante este período de tiempo se asistieron en nuestro servicio 2.430 partos, con un 87 por ciento de partos vaginales, un 2,5 por ciento de fórceps y un 9,7 por ciento de cesáreas. El diseño del presente estudio fue de corte transversal. La población estudiada se conformó con las pacientes que cumplieron los criterios de inclusión: embarazo único, de bajo riesgo, presentación cefálica, de término, en trabajo de parto, conociendo el estado de las membranas ovulares. Se excluyeron las presentaciones pelvianas, transversas, cesáreas anteriores o cualquier otra patología asociada al embarazo. Para el análisis se conformaron luego 2 Lotes: Alerta y Control. Se siguió en caso de alerta lo indicado en las Normas Nacionales y Provinciales de Bajo Riesgo. Se conformó una base de Datos informatizada usando EPI. Info 5.0 con el cálculo del Riesgo Relativo y test de significación. Para lo que se utilizó también el paquete informático Primer. Resultados: Las paciente Nulíparas tienen mayor Riesgo de desarrollar alerta. La dilatación cervical al ingreso a la sala de partos, el Score de Apgar al 1´y 5´y el peso al nacer no presentan diferencias estadísticamente significativas en ambos Lotes. Observándose diferencias significativas en uso de uteroestimulación con occitocina endovenosa por flevoclisis, terminación en cesárea o forceps. Se internaron con significativa mayor frecuencia los Recién Nacidos de Alerta. Conclusiones: La Curva de Alerta se presenta como un excelente instrumento para discriminar las pacientes que presentan trabajo parto que necesitan mayor cuidado por el incremento en el índice de cesáreas y mayor proporción de internaciones neonatales, promoviendo el uso racional de medicación intraparto (AU)


Subject(s)
Adult , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Parturition/methods , Population Surveillance/methods , Labor, Obstetric/physiology , Risk Factors , Uterine Rupture/complications , Uterine Rupture/diagnosis , Uterine Rupture/prevention & control , Population Surveillance , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Obstetrical Forceps , Obstetrical Forceps/classification , Cesarean Section/methods , Cesarean Section/classification
10.
Clin Perinatol ; 22(4): 953-72, 1995 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8665767

ABSTRACT

A historical review of the development of forceps and the refinements made that lend them to different clinical situations are presented. The proper settings for their use and the choice of instruments and methods of application for traction and rotation are discussed. The risks to mother and infant are considered. Following these general precepts should allow for continued safe usage in modern day obstetrics.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric , Obstetrical Forceps , Birth Injuries/etiology , Contraindications , Delivery, Obstetric/instrumentation , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Obstetrical Forceps/adverse effects , Obstetrical Forceps/classification , Pregnancy , Rotation , Traction
11.
Ginecol Obstet Mex ; 63: 264-6, 1995 Jun.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7642155

ABSTRACT

In the magazine of Gineco Obstetricia de México, January 1988, 30 to 34, I presented the three first models of the Salas forceps. In this article I describe the fourth and last design of my invention which has been patented in the USA as "Salas Obstetric Spatulas". It is mentioned in this article, the advantages of this instrument, which after being used in 533 applications by Dr. Fernandez del Castillo, SC and Dr. Viesca, MA they have come to the conclusion that the Salas instrument is excellent. Laufe et al in his book describe: There is no doubt that these forceps (Salas) could be made more acceptable to US practitioners. It is insisted in the modern classification of the forceps.


Subject(s)
Obstetrical Forceps , Delivery, Obstetric/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Obstetrical Forceps/classification , Obstetrical Forceps/standards , Pregnancy
13.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 3(6): 769-72, 1991 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1818713

ABSTRACT

Decisions about the role of cesarean section, forceps, and vacuum delivery in obstetrics continue to be a challenging part of daily obstetric practice. Five interesting papers on this topic are reviewed, including a comparison of international rates of cesarean sections and vaginal births after cesarean section, the method of choice for the delivery of the low-birth-weight fetus presenting as vertex, the advantages of a prelabor cesarean section for a fetus diagnosed with meningomyelocele, and the appropriate role for the midforceps delivery in the 1990s.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/standards , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Obstetrical Forceps/statistics & numerical data , Trial of Labor , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Humans , Labor Presentation , Meningomyelocele/complications , Meningomyelocele/epidemiology , Meningomyelocele/therapy , Obstetrical Forceps/classification , Pregnancy
14.
Obstet Gynecol ; 77(3): 356-60, 1991 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1992398

ABSTRACT

In February 1988, an ACOG Committee Opinion substantially revised the classification of forceps operations. The revision addressed two significant shortcomings of the old system: Outlet forceps had been defined too narrowly and midforceps too imprecisely. We now report the results of a prospective study of 357 forceps deliveries classified using each system. Allowing up to 45 degrees of rotation in an outlet forceps delivery did not increase morbidity measured by any criterion. Dividing the old midforceps group by precisely identifying station and rotation permitted greater stratification of the risks of short-term neonatal and maternal morbidity. We conclude that our results validate the 1988 classification scheme.


Subject(s)
Birth Injuries/etiology , Obstetrical Forceps/classification , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Vagina/injuries , Wounds and Injuries/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...