Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.408
Filter
1.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1231, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702701

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic inequalities in type 2 diabetes (T2D) are well established in the literature. However, within the background of changing work contexts associated with digitalization and its effect on lifestyle and sedentary behavior, little is known on T2D prevalence and trends among different occupational groups. This study aims to examine occupational sector differences in T2D prevalence and trends thereof between 2012 and 2019. METHODS: The study was done on 1.683.644 employed individuals using data from the German statutory health insurance provider in Lower Saxony, the "Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Niedersachsen" (AOKN). Predicted probabilities for T2D prevalence in four two-year periods between 2012 and 2019 were estimated based on logistic regression analyses for nine occupational sectors. Prevalence ratios were calculated to illustrate the effect of time period on the prevalence of T2D among the nine occupational sectors. Analyses were stratified by gender and two age groups. RESULTS: Results showed differences among occupational sectors in the predicted probabilities for T2D. The occupational sectors "Transport, logistics, protection and security" and "Health sector, social work, teaching & education" had the highest predicted probabilities, while those working in the sector "Agriculture" had by far the lowest predicted probabilities for T2D. Over all, there appeared to be a rising trend in T2D prevalence among younger employed individuals, with gender differences among occupational sectors. CONCLUSION: The study displayed different vulnerability levels among occupational sectors with respect to T2D prevalence overall and for its rising trend among the younger age group. Specific occupations within the vulnerable sectors need to be focused upon in further research to define specific target groups to which T2D prevention interventions should be tailored.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Germany/epidemiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Prevalence , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Young Adult , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Insurance Claim Review
2.
Work ; 78(1): 181-193, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701124

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although many studies have investigated the physical and ergonomic risks of spine pain in specific occupation groups, the literature is lacking on occupation-based clinical and psychological presentation in patients with spine pain. OBJECTIVE: To analyze occupation-based variation in demographic, clinical, and psychological presentation in patients with spine pain. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 71727 patients with spine pain visiting a chain of spine rehabilitation clinics. Demographic and clinical variables such as gender, age, affected site, symptom duration, clinical symptoms and presentation, pain intensity, disability, and STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) risk were compared between 9 occupational groups. RESULTS: The service and sales workers (44%) and students (43.5%) groups had the highest percentage of patients who presented with central spine pain; military personnel had the highest percentage of patients who presented with unilateral radicular pain (51.5%); and the retired or unemployed group had the highest percentage of patients who presented with severe myotomal loss (grade≤3) (6%). Homemakers had significantly higher pain intensity and disability (p < 0.001) and had the highest percentage of patients who presented with severe pain (47%), severe and crippled disability (59.5%), and medium to high risk (59%) with SBT when compared to other occupational groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with spine pain showed variation in demographic, clinical, and psychological presentation based on their occupation. The findings of this study can be the basis for identifying risk factors for spine pain and helping plan preventive and treatment measures based on their occupation.


Subject(s)
Back Pain , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , India/epidemiology , Adult , Middle Aged , Back Pain/psychology , Back Pain/epidemiology , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Pain Measurement/methods
3.
Rev Saude Publica ; 58: 13, 2024.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695442

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the distribution and association of sociodemographic and occupational factors with self-reported work accidents (WA) in a representative sample of the Brazilian population, with emphasis on occupational class, and to examine gender differences in this distribution. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study, using data from the 2019 National Health Survey (PNS), analyzed the responses of a sample of adults aged 18 or over. Factors associated with WA were investigated using binary logistic regression and hierarchical analysis using blocks (sociodemographic and occupational variables). The final model was adjusted by variables from all blocks, adopting a significance level of 5%. The values of odds ratios (OR) and respective confidence intervals were obtained. RESULTS: Among the participants, 2.69% reported having suffered a WA, with a higher prevalence in men (3.37%; 95%CI 2.97-3.82%) than in women (1.86%; 95%CI 1.55-2.23%). The analysis identified that age group, night work, working hours, and exposure to occupational risks were associated with WA, with emphasis on gender differences. The class of manual workers, both qualified (ORwomen = 2.87; 95%CI 1.33-6.21 and ORmen = 2.46; 95%CI 1.37-4.40) and unskilled (ORwomen = 2.55; 95%CI 1.44-4.50 and ORmen = 3.70; 95%CI 1.95-7.03), had a higher chance of WA than the class of managers/professionals. CONCLUSION: Occupational factors contributed significantly to the increase in the probability of WA for men and women, with greater magnitude among those positioned in the lower strata of the occupational structure. The results obtained are clues for working out WA prevention actions.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational , Socioeconomic Factors , Humans , Brazil/epidemiology , Male , Female , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Sex Factors , Adolescent , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Health Surveys , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Occupations/classification , Prevalence , Sociodemographic Factors , Self Report
4.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1364886, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741906

ABSTRACT

Background: The strain on workers of the healthcare system and education sector increased psychological distress and burnout. This study aimed to distinguish the occupational group that is the most affected by occupational burnout and to reveal the scope of psychosocial risk factors among each occupational group. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that analyzed burnout syndrome among 1,046 participants of different occupational groups in association with psychosocial work environment factors in Lithuania. The anonymous questionnaire was composed of the standardized Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ), and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). To find out associations between psychosocial work environment factors and burnout dimensions, a multiple logistic regression model using the stepwise method was applied. Results: The burnout levels in all three dimensions (personal, work-related, and client-related burnout) were significantly higher in physicians' and nurses' groups compared with public health professionals, teachers, and managers (p < 0.05). The job demands were associated with the personal burnout subscale for all occupations, except public health specialists - each one-unit increase of this variable significantly increased the probability of personal burnout from 10 to 16%, respectively by the occupation. Co-worker support was found to have a buffering effect for all occupational groups, except managers - and significantly reduced personal burnout for physicians (OR = 0.80), nurses (OR = 0.75), public health specialists (OR = 0.75), and teachers (OR = 0.79). Conclusion: The burnout levels in all three dimensions differed between occupational groups: there were significantly higher in physicians' and nurses' groups compared with public health professionals, teachers, and managers. Considering the occupational preventive measures in the healthcare sector attention should be paid to the reduction of workload and ensuring good relations between co-workers.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , Workplace , Humans , Lithuania/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , Workplace/psychology , Risk Factors , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data
5.
Am J Ind Med ; 67(6): 539-550, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606790

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess workplace segregation in fatal occupational injury from 1992 to 2017 in North Carolina. METHODS: We calculated occupational fatal injury rates within categories of occupation, industry, race, age, and sex; and estimated expected numbers of fatalities among Black and Hispanic male workers had they experienced the rates of White male workers. We also estimated the contribution of workforce segregation to disparities by estimating the expected number of fatalities among Black and Hispanic male workers had they experienced the industry and occupation patterns of White male workers. We assessed person-years of life-lost, using North Carolina life expectancy estimates. RESULTS: Hispanic workers contributed 32% of their worker-years and experienced 58% of their fatalities in construction. Black workers were most overrepresented in the food manufacturing industry. Hispanic males experienced 2.11 (95% CI: 1.86-2.40) times the mortality rate of White males. The Black-White and Hispanic-White disparities were widest among workers aged 45 and older, and segregation into more dangerous industries and occupations played a substantial role in driving disparities. Hispanic workers who suffered occupational fatalities lost a median 47 life-years, compared to 37 among Black workers and 36 among White workers. CONCLUSIONS: If Hispanic and Black workers experienced the workplace safety of their White counterparts, fatal injury rates would be substantially reduced. Workforce segregation reflects structural racism, which also contributes to mortality disparities. Root causes must be addressed to eliminate disparities.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Hispanic or Latino , Occupational Injuries , White People , Humans , North Carolina/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Occupational Injuries/mortality , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Workplace/statistics & numerical data , Female , Social Segregation , Young Adult , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Accidents, Occupational/mortality , Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Industry/statistics & numerical data
6.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 506, 2024 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38685000

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Almost 200,000 tongue cancers were diagnosed worldwide in 2020. The aim of this study was to describe occupational risk variation in this malignancy. METHODS: The data are based on the Nordic Occupational Cancer (NOCCA) study containing 14.9 million people from the Nordic countries with 9020 tongue cancers diagnosed during 1961-2005. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of tongue cancer in each occupational category was calculated using national incidence rates as the reference. RESULTS: Among men, the incidence was statistically significantly elevated in waiters (SIR 4.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.13--5.92), beverage workers (SIR 3.42, 95% CI 2.02-5.40), cooks and stewards (SIR 2.55, 95% CI 1.82-3.48), seamen (SIR 1.66, 95% CI 1.36-2.00), journalists (SIR 1.85, 95% CI 1.18-2.75), artistic workers (SIR 2.05, 95% CI 1.54-2.66), hairdressers (SIR 2.17, 95% CI 1.39-3.22), and economically inactive persons (SIR 1.57, 95% CI 1.42-1.73). Among women, the SIR was statistically significantly elevated only in waitresses (SIR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.81). Statistically significant SIRs ≤ 0.63 were observed in male farmers, gardeners, forestry workers and teachers, and in female launderers. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may be related to consumption of alcohol and tobacco, but the effect of carcinogenic exposure from work cannot be excluded.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases , Occupations , Tongue Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Tongue Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Scandinavian and Nordic Countries/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Incidence , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Adult , Risk Factors , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Sex Factors , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects
7.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(4)2024 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38674320

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Research into the relationship between occupation and dental fear and anxiety (DFA) is scarce. This exploratory study aimed to compare the level of DFA and its association with its predictors amongst adults from different occupational groups. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study with 422 respondents from four occupational groups (physicians, teachers, industry workers, and artists) was carried out. A questionnaire on previous dental experience using the Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS), Dental Fear Survey (DFS), and Self-Esteem Scale was self-administered electronically. The data analysis involved descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling (SEM). Results: The DFA levels differed significantly across the occupational groups, with the lowest mean scores among physicians (DAS = 9.29 (SE 0.39); DFS-1 = 14.67 (0.63); DFS-2 = 33.94 (1.69)) and the highest mean scores among artists (DAS = 10.74 (0.38); DFS-1 = 17.19 (0.71); DFS-2 = 41.34 (1.92)). A significant impact of self-esteem on DFA was observed among physicians, teachers, and artists, but not among industry workers. Multi-group analysis with SEM revealed differences in the variable association (Chi-squared = 53.75; df = 21; p < 0.001), thus rejecting the hypothesis of the same mechanism underlying DFA across occupational groups. Conclusions: Individuals from various occupations experience DFA at different levels, and there are different mechanisms underlying their DFA. These findings can provide valuable insights for dental practitioners in developing tailored approaches to reduce the feeling of DFA of their patients.


Subject(s)
Dental Anxiety , Humans , Dental Anxiety/psychology , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Self Concept
8.
Am J Ind Med ; 67(6): 532-538, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583075

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Work-related asthma (WRA), a preventable occupational disease, can result in adverse health outcomes and employment disability, including decreased productivity, lost workdays, and job loss. Early identification of WRA cases and avoidance of further exposures is crucial for optimal management. OBJECTIVE: We estimate WRA prevalence among US workers by selected sociodemographic characteristics, industry, and occupation groups and assess the differences in adverse health outcomes, preventive care, and lost workdays between persons with WRA and those with non-WRA. METHODS: The 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data for working adults aged ≥18 years employed in the 12 months before the survey were analyzed. Prevalence, and adjusted prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the estimated 170 million US adults working in the past year, 13.0 million (7.6%) had asthma. Among workers with asthma, an estimated 896,000 (6.9%) had WRA. WRA prevalence was highest among males, workers aged ≥55 years, those with no health insurance, those living in the Midwest, and those employed in the accommodation, food, and other services industry, and in production, installation, transportation, and material moving occupations. Workers with WRA were significantly more likely to use preventive medication and rescue inhalers, and to experience adverse health outcomes and lost workdays than workers with non-WRA. CONCLUSION: Early identification of WRA cases, assessment of workplace exposures, and implementation of targeted interventions that consider the hierarchy of controls are critical to preventing future WRA cases and associated adverse health consequences.


Subject(s)
Asthma, Occupational , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Prevalence , Young Adult , Adolescent , Asthma, Occupational/epidemiology , Health Surveys , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Asthma/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Industry/statistics & numerical data
9.
Ann Epidemiol ; 94: 42-48, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642626

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Methods for assessing the structural mechanisms of health inequity are not well established. This study applies a phased approach to modeling racial, occupational, and rural disparities on the county level. METHODS: Rural counties with disparately high rates of COVID-19 incidence or mortality were randomly paired with in-state control counties with the same rural-urban continuum code. Analysis was restricted to the first six months of the pandemic to represent the baseline structural reserves for each county and reduce biases related to the disruption of these reserves over time. Conditional logistic regression was applied in two phases-first, to examine the demographic distribution of disparities and then, to examine the relationships between these disparities and county-level social and structural reserves. RESULTS: In over 200 rural county pairs (205 for incidence, 209 for mortality), disparities were associated with structural variables representing economic factors, healthcare infrastructure, and local industry. Modeling results were sensitive to assumptions about the relationships between race and other social and structural variables measured at the county level, particularly in models intended to reflect effect modification or mediation. CONCLUSIONS: Multivariable modeling of health disparities should reflect the social and structural mechanisms of inequity and anticipate interventions that can advance equity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Status Disparities , Rural Population , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/ethnology , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Male , Female , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Health Inequities , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Incidence , Adult
10.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 68(4): 397-408, 2024 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536905

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted as an effort to develop a Korean construction job exposure matrix (KoConJEM) based on 60 occupations recently consolidated by the construction workers mutual aid association for use by the construction industry. METHODS: The probability, intensity, and prevalence of exposure to 26 hazardous agents for 60 consolidated occupations were evaluated as binary (Yes/No) or four categories (1 to 4) by 30 industrial hygiene experts. The score for risk was calculated by multiplying the exposure intensity by the prevalence of exposure. Fleiss' kappa for each hazardous agent and occupation was used to determine agreement among the 30 experts. The JEM was expressed on a heatmap and a web-based dashboard to facilitate comparison of factors affecting exposure according to each occupation and hazardous agent. RESULTS: Awkward posture, heat/cold, heavy lifting, and noise were hazardous agents regarded as exposure is probable by at least one or more experts in all occupations, while exposure to asphalt fumes was considered hazardous in the smallest number of occupations (n = 5). Based on the degree of agreement among experts, more than half of the harmful factors and most occupations showed fair to good results. The highest risk value was 16 for awkward posture for most occupations other than safety officer. CONCLUSIONS: The KoConJEM provides information on the probability, intensity, and prevalence of exposure to harmful factors, including most occupations employing construction workers; therefore, it may be useful in the conduct of epidemiological studies on assessment of health risk for construction workers.


Subject(s)
Construction Industry , Occupational Exposure , Occupations , Humans , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Republic of Korea , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Hazardous Substances/analysis , Risk Assessment/methods , Posture , Hydrocarbons/analysis , Judgment , Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , Occupational Health , Prevalence
11.
Nature ; 626(8001): 1049-1055, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38355800

ABSTRACT

Each year, people spend less time reading and more time viewing images1, which are proliferating online2-4. Images from platforms such as Google and Wikipedia are downloaded by millions every day2,5,6, and millions more are interacting through social media, such as Instagram and TikTok, that primarily consist of exchanging visual content. In parallel, news agencies and digital advertisers are increasingly capturing attention online through the use of images7,8, which people process more quickly, implicitly and memorably than text9-12. Here we show that the rise of images online significantly exacerbates gender bias, both in its statistical prevalence and its psychological impact. We examine the gender associations of 3,495 social categories (such as 'nurse' or 'banker') in more than one million images from Google, Wikipedia and Internet Movie Database (IMDb), and in billions of words from these platforms. We find that gender bias is consistently more prevalent in images than text for both female- and male-typed categories. We also show that the documented underrepresentation of women online13-18 is substantially worse in images than in text, public opinion and US census data. Finally, we conducted a nationally representative, preregistered experiment that shows that googling for images rather than textual descriptions of occupations amplifies gender bias in participants' beliefs. Addressing the societal effect of this large-scale shift towards visual communication will be essential for developing a fair and inclusive future for the internet.


Subject(s)
Occupations , Photography , Sexism , Social Media , Female , Humans , Male , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Photography/statistics & numerical data , Photography/trends , Public Opinion , Sexism/prevention & control , Sexism/psychology , Sexism/statistics & numerical data , Sexism/trends , Social Media/statistics & numerical data , Social Change
12.
Econ Hum Biol ; 53: 101367, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38340649

ABSTRACT

Retirement, a major transition in the life course, may affect many aspects of retirees' well-being, including health and health care utilization. Leveraging differential statutory retirement age (SRA) by occupation for China's urban female workers, we provide some of the first evidence on the causal effect of retirement on hospitalizations attributable to mental illness and its heterogeneity. To address endogeneity in retirement decisions, we take advantage of exogeneity of the differing SRA cut-offs for blue-collar (age 50) and white-collar (age 55) female urban employees. We apply a Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) around the SRA cut-offs using nationally representative hospital inpatient claims data that cover these workers. We show that blue-collar females incur more hospitalizations for mental illness after retirement, while no similar change is found for white-collar females. Conditional on blue-collar females being hospitalized, probabilities of overall and ER admissions due to mental illness increase by 2.3 and 1.2 percentage points upon retirement, respectively. The effects are primarily driven by patients within the categories of schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders; and neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders. Moreover, the 'Donut' RDD estimates suggest that pent-up demand at retirement unlikely dominates our findings for blue-collar females. Rather, our results lend support to their worsening mental health at retirement. These findings suggest that occupational differences in mental illness and related health care utilization at retirement should be considered when optimizing retirement policy schemes.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Mental Disorders , Occupations , Retirement , Humans , Female , Retirement/statistics & numerical data , China/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Fuzzy Logic
13.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1129708, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37089493

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Occupation can contribute to differences in risk and stage at diagnosis of breast cancer. This study aimed at determining whether occupation, along with skill level and the socio-professional category, affect the breast cancer survival (BCS) up to 10 years after diagnosis. Materials and methods: We used cancer registry records to identify women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer in western Switzerland over the period 1990-2014 and matched them with the Swiss National Cohort. The effect of work-related variables on BCS was assessed using non-parametric and parametric net survival methods. Results: Study sample included 8,678 women. In the non-parametric analysis, we observed a statistically significant effect of all work-related variables on BCS. Women in elementary occupations, with low skill level, and in paid employment not classified elsewhere, had the lowest BCS, while professionals, those with the highest skill level and belonging to top management and independent profession category had the highest BCS. The parametric analysis confirmed this pattern. Considering elementary occupations as reference, all occupations but Craft and related trades had a hazard ratio (HR) below 1. Among professionals, technicians and associate professionals, and clerks, the protective effect of occupation was statistically significant and remained unchanged after adjustment for age, calendar period, registry, nationality, and histological type. After adjusting for tumor stage, the HRs increased only slightly, though turned non-significant. The same effect was observed in top management and independent professions and supervisors, low level management and skilled laborers, compared to unskilled employees. Conclusion: These results suggest that work-related factors may affect BCS. Yet, this study was conducted using a limited set of covariates and a relatively small study sample. Therefore, further larger studies are needed for more detailed analyses of at risk occupations and working conditions and assessing the potential interaction between work-related variables and tumor stage.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Occupations , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Proportional Hazards Models , Switzerland/epidemiology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Employment/statistics & numerical data
14.
Actas dermo-sifiliogr. (Ed. impr.) ; 114(1): 1-8, jan. 2023. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-214464

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic and painful condition with negative impact on daily activity. Little information on the impact of disease-specific factors on educational level and occupational status in hidradenitis suppurativa patients has been reported. We sought to identify how disease-specific factors could influence occupational status and educational level in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Methods Cross-sectional study of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa seen between September 2017 and September 2018. Disease-specific variables were analyzed to find associations in patients with different educational levels and occupational status. Results Ninety-eight patients were included. Patients with non-university studies had more frequently ≥ 3 affected areas (22.5% [16/73] vs 4.8% [1/22], p = 0.049), a higher number of painful days (8.5 [SD 8.8] vs 4.6 [SD 4.8], p = 0.048) and a higher score on the VAS scale (6.7 [SD 2.8] vs 5.0 [3.3], p = 0.031). Patients from the inactive group had a significantly increased number of painful days (11.2 [SD 10.4] vs 5.7 [SD 6.2], p = 0.004). This group had a greater number of patients with a history of depression (61.3% [19/31] vs 27.4% [17/62], p = 0.002) and a higher mean BMI (32.3 [9.1] vs 28.4 [6.4], p = 0.016). Late disease onset was significantly associated with being “inactive” (26.7% [8/31] vs 6.5% [4/62], p = 0.026). No significant differences between severity scales of hidradenitis suppurativa and educational level or occupational status were found. Limitations: cross-sectional and single center study. Conclusions Pain, ≥3 affected areas, history of depression, higher mean BMI, and late onset of hidradenitis suppurativa, are associated with low education level and inactive occupational status (AU)


Antecedentes y objetivos La hidrosadenitis supurativa es una condición crónica y dolorosa, con impacto negativo en la actividad diaria. Se ha reportado poca información sobre el impacto que tienen los factores específicos de la enfermedad en el nivel educativo y el estatus ocupacional de los pacientes con esta situación. Nuestro objetivo fue identificar el modo en que dichos factores específicos de la enfermedad podrían influir en el nivel educativo y el estatus ocupacional de los pacientes con hidrosadenitis supurativa. Métodos Estudio transversal de pacientes con hidrosadenitis supurativa examinados entre septiembre de 2017 y septiembre de 2018. Se analizaron las variables específicas de la enfermedad para encontrar una asociación en los pacientes con diferentes niveles educativos y estatus ocupacionales. Resultados Se incluyó a 98 pacientes. Aquellos con estudios no universitarios tenían afectadas más frecuentemente ≥ 3 zonas (22,5% [16/73] vs. 4,8% [1/22], p = 0,049), pasaban un elevado número de días con dolor (8,5 [DE 8,8] vs. 4,6 [DE 4,8], p = 0,048) y su puntuación en la escala EVA era alta (6,7 [DE 2,8] vs. 5 [3,3], p = 0,031). Los pacientes pertenecientes al grupo inactivo tenían un número considerablemente incrementado de días con dolor (11,2 [DE 10,4] vs. 5,7 [DE 6,2], p = 0,004). En este grupo había un mayor número de pacientes con historia de depresión (61,3% [19/31] vs. 27,4% [17/62], p = 0,002) y un mayor IMC medio (32,3 [9,1] vs. 28,4 [6,4], p = 0,016). El inicio tardío de la enfermedad se asoció significativamente a la situación de «inactivo» (26,7% [8/31] vs. 6,5% [4/62], p = 0,026). No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre las escalas de gravedad de la hidrosadenitis supurativa y el nivel educativo y el estatus ocupacional. Limitaciones: estudio transversal y unicéntrico (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/complications , Pain/etiology , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Educational Status , Cross-Sectional Studies , Quality of Life , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Actas dermo-sifiliogr. (Ed. impr.) ; 114(1): T1-T8, jan. 2023. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-214465

ABSTRACT

Antecedentes y objetivos La hidrosadenitis supurativa es una condición crónica y dolorosa, con impacto negativo en la actividad diaria. Se ha reportado poca información sobre el impacto que tienen los factores específicos de la enfermedad en el nivel educativo y el estatus ocupacional de los pacientes con esta situación. Nuestro objetivo fue identificar el modo en que dichos factores específicos de la enfermedad podrían influir en el nivel educativo y el estatus ocupacional de los pacientes con hidrosadenitis supurativa. Métodos Estudio transversal de pacientes con hidrosadenitis supurativa examinados entre septiembre de 2017 y septiembre de 2018. Se analizaron las variables específicas de la enfermedad para encontrar una asociación en los pacientes con diferentes niveles educativos y estatus ocupacionales. Resultados Se incluyó a 98 pacientes. Aquellos con estudios no universitarios tenían afectadas más frecuentemente ≥ 3 zonas (22,5% [16/73] vs. 4,8% [1/22], p = 0,049), pasaban un elevado número de días con dolor (8,5 [DE 8,8] vs. 4,6 [DE 4,8], p = 0,048) y su puntuación en la escala EVA era alta (6,7 [DE 2,8] vs. 5 [3,3], p = 0,031). Los pacientes pertenecientes al grupo inactivo tenían un número considerablemente incrementado de días con dolor (11,2 [DE 10,4] vs. 5,7 [DE 6,2], p = 0,004). En este grupo había un mayor número de pacientes con historia de depresión (61,3% [19/31] vs. 27,4% [17/62], p = 0,002) y un mayor IMC medio (32,3 [9,1] vs. 28,4 [6,4], p = 0,016). El inicio tardío de la enfermedad se asoció significativamente a la situación de «inactivo» (26,7% [8/31] vs. 6,5% [4/62], p = 0,026). No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre las escalas de gravedad de la hidrosadenitis supurativa y el nivel educativo y el estatus ocupacional. Limitaciones: estudio transversal y unicéntrico (AU)


Background and objectives Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic and painful condition with negative impact on daily activity. Little information on the impact of disease-specific factors on educational level and occupational status in hidradenitis suppurativa patients has been reported. We sought to identify how disease-specific factors could influence occupational status and educational level in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Methods Cross-sectional study of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa seen between September 2017 and September 2018. Disease-specific variables were analyzed to find associations in patients with different educational levels and occupational status. Results Ninety-eight patients were included. Patients with non-university studies had more frequently ≥ 3 affected areas (22.5% [16/73] vs 4.8% [1/22], p = 0.049), a higher number of painful days (8.5 [SD 8.8] vs 4.6 [SD 4.8], p = 0.048) and a higher score on the VAS scale (6.7 [SD 2.8] vs 5.0 [3.3], p = 0.031). Patients from the inactive group had a significantly increased number of painful days (11.2 [SD 10.4] vs 5.7 [SD 6.2], p = 0.004). This group had a greater number of patients with a history of depression (61.3% [19/31] vs 27.4% [17/62], p = 0.002) and a higher mean BMI (32.3 [9.1] vs 28.4 [6.4], p = 0.016). Late disease onset was significantly associated with being “inactive” (26.7% [8/31] vs 6.5% [4/62], p = 0.026). No significant differences between severity scales of hidradenitis suppurativa and educational level or occupational status were found. Limitations: cross-sectional and single center study. Conclusions Pain, ≥3 affected areas, history of depression, higher mean BMI, and late onset of hidradenitis suppurativa, are associated with low education level and inactive occupational status (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/complications , Pain/etiology , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Educational Status , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Cross-Sectional Studies , Quality of Life
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(7): 1285-1294, 2023 04 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36373203

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the United States by occupation. We identified occupations at higher risk for prior SARS-CoV-2 infection as defined by the presence of infection-induced antibodies among US blood donors. METHODS: Using a nested case-control study design, blood donors during May-December 2021 with anti-nucleocapsid (anti-N) testing were sent an electronic survey on employment status, vaccination, and occupation. The association between previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and occupation-specific in-person work was estimated using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for sex, age, month of donation, race and ethnicity, education, vaccination, and telework. RESULTS: Among 85 986 included survey respondents, 9504 (11.1%) were anti-N reactive. Healthcare support (20.3%), protective service (19.9%), and food preparation and serving related occupations (19.7%) had the highest proportion of prior infection. After adjustment, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with healthcare practitioners (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74-2.54) and healthcare support (aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.39-2.40) occupations compared with computer and mathematical occupations as the referent group. Lack of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination (aOR, 16.13; 95% CI, 15.01-17.34) and never teleworking (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.30) were also independently associated with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Construction and extraction occupations had the highest proportion of unvaccinated workers (30.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Workers in healthcare, protective services, and food preparation had the highest prevalence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Occupational risks for SARS-CoV-2 infection remained after adjusting for vaccination, telework, and demographic factors. These findings underscore the need for mitigation measures and personal protection in healthcare settings and other workplaces.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , COVID-19 , Food Industry , Health Personnel , Occupations , Vaccination , Humans , Blood Donors/statistics & numerical data , Case-Control Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Risk Factors , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Food Industry/statistics & numerical data
17.
Health Serv Res ; 58(3): 642-653, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36478574

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected racial and ethnic minorities among the general population in the United States; however, little is known regarding its impact on U.S. military Veterans. In this study, our objectives were to identify the extent to which Veterans experienced increased all-cause mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic, stratified by race and ethnicity. DATA SOURCES: Administrative data from the Veterans Health Administration's Corporate Data Warehouse. STUDY DESIGN: We use pre-pandemic data to estimate mortality risk models using five-fold cross-validation and quasi-Poisson regression. Models were stratified by a combined race-ethnicity variable and included controls for major comorbidities, demographic characteristics, and county fixed effects. DATA COLLECTION: We queried data for all Veterans residing in the 50 states plus Washington D.C. during 2016-2020. Veterans were excluded from analyses if they were missing county of residence or race-ethnicity data. Data were then aggregated to the county-year level and stratified by race-ethnicity. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Overall, Veterans' mortality rates were 16% above normal during March-December 2020 which equates to 42,348 excess deaths. However, there was substantial variation by racial and ethnic group. Non-Hispanic White Veterans experienced the smallest relative increase in mortality (17%, 95% CI 11%-24%), while Native American Veterans had the highest increase (40%, 95% CI 17%-73%). Black Veterans (32%, 95% CI 27%-39%) and Hispanic Veterans (26%, 95% CI 17%-36%) had somewhat lower excess mortality, although these changes were significantly higher compared to White Veterans. Disparities were smaller than in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Minoritized Veterans experienced higher rates excess of mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to White Veterans, though with smaller differences than the general population. This is likely due in part to the long-standing history of structural racism in the United States that has negatively affected the health of minoritized communities via several pathways including health care access, economic, and occupational inequities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Veterans , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/ethnology , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , United States/epidemiology , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , White/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , American Indian or Alaska Native/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Systemic Racism/ethnology , Systemic Racism/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility , Employment/economics , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Occupations/economics , Occupations/statistics & numerical data
19.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 119(32): e2121439119, 2022 08 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35914176

ABSTRACT

In the early 1970s, the balkanization of the US labor market into "men's occupations" and "women's occupations" began to unravel, as women entered the professions and other male-typed sectors in record numbers. This decline in gender segregation continued on for several decades but then suddenly stalled at the turn of the century and shows no signs of resuming. Although the stall is itself undisputed, its sources remain unclear. Using nearly a half-century of data from the General Social Survey, we show that a resurgence in segregation-inducing forms of intergenerational transmission stands behind the recent stall. Far from serving as impartial conduits, fathers are now disproportionately conveying male-typed occupations to their sons, whereas mothers are effectively gender-neutral in their transmission outcomes. This segregative turn among fathers accounts for 47% of the stall in the gender segregation trend (between 2000 and 2018), while the earlier integrative turn among fathers accounts for 34% of the initial downturn in segregation (between 1972 and 1999). It follows that a U-turn in intergenerational processes lies behind the U-turn in gender segregation.


Subject(s)
Gender Identity , Occupations , Social Segregation , Fathers/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Mothers/statistics & numerical data , Occupations/statistics & numerical data
20.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 23(2): 475-783, 2022 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35225459

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although it is known that cancer mortality rate varies depending on occupations in Japan, differences in female cancer mortality rate depending on occupational classes have not been analyzed using the Vital Statistics in Japan. In this study, we analyzed the Vital Statistics data in Japan from 1995 to 2015, and revealed differences in cancer mortality rate depending on occupational classes among Japanese women. METHODS: The Vital Statistics data by occupations from 1995 to 2015 were obtained from the "Report of Vital Statistics : Occupational and Industrial Aspects" in Japan, and data on mortality for cancer in all sites, colorectal cancer, liver cancer, gallbladder and extrahepatic bile duct cancer, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, and uterine cancer were used. We classified main occupation categories into non-manual workers and manual workers, and calculated age-standardized mortality rate for each of the occupational class, year, age group, and type of cancer and its annual percent change. RESULTS: Age-standardized mortality rates for non-manual workers (222.0 per 100,000 persons in 1995 and 143.8 per 100,000 persons in 2015) were higher in cancer in all sites than those for manual workers (127.6 per 100,000 persons in 1995 and 103.7 per 100,000 persons in 2015) throughout the years. However, age-standardized mortality rates showed a significant decreasing trend between 1995 and 2015 for non-manual workers, and the absolute value of annual percent change was higher in non-manual workers than in manual workers. As a result, a difference in age-standardized mortality rates for cancer in all sites between the two types of occupational classes decreased throughout the years. CONCLUSION: A further study investigating differences in physical or behavioral characteristics of female non-manual and manual workers is needed in order to understand the key factors for the higher cancer mortality rate in non-manual workers.


Subject(s)
Mortality/trends , Neoplasms/mortality , Occupational Diseases/mortality , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Occupations/classification , Women's Health/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...