Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Chirurg ; 85(8): 705-10, 2014 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24499996

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Complications after cholecystectomy are continuously documented in a nationwide database in Germany. Recent studies demonstrated a lack of reliability of these data. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a control algorithm on documentation quality and the use of routine diagnosis coding as an additional validation instrument. METHODS: Completeness and correctness of the documentation of complications after cholecystectomy was compared over a time interval of 12 months before and after implementation of an algorithm for faster and more accurate documentation. Furthermore, the coding of all diagnoses was screened to identify intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The sensitivity of the documentation for complications improved from 46 % to 70 % (p = 0.05, specificity 98 % in both time intervals). A prolonged time interval of more than 6 weeks between patient discharge and documentation was associated with inferior data quality (incorrect documentation in 1.5 % versus 15 %, p < 0.05). The rate of case documentation within the 6 weeks after hospital discharge was clearly improved after implementation of the control algorithm. Sensitivity and specificity of screening for complications by evaluating routine diagnoses coding were 70 % and 85 %, respectively. The quality of documentation was improved by implementation of a simple memory algorithm.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy , Documentation/standards , Intraoperative Complications/diagnosis , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/standards , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality Improvement/standards , Algorithms , Benchmarking/legislation & jurisprudence , Benchmarking/standards , Clinical Coding/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Coding/standards , Data Collection/legislation & jurisprudence , Data Collection/standards , Germany , Humans , National Health Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , National Health Programs/standards , Operating Room Information Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , Operating Room Information Systems/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Improvement/legislation & jurisprudence , Software
3.
AORN J ; 75(1): 121-5, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11813400

ABSTRACT

Many current information management practices in the OR will have to change to comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and meet Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations standards for managing health care information. Demands for accurate, timely, confidential, and secure data make an integrated automated system for information management imperative. Delivering health care in today's OR environment results in enormous amounts of data. Caregivers must transform this data into useable information, while protecting patient privacy, confidentiality, and the security of health care information.


Subject(s)
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act , Operating Room Information Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , Operating Rooms/legislation & jurisprudence , Computer Security/legislation & jurisprudence , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Facility Regulation and Control , Humans , Privacy , United States
4.
Langenbecks Arch Chir ; 382(2): 69-73, 1997.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9198708

ABSTRACT

The structural health care law (known as the Gesundheitsstrukturgesetz or GSG) of the Federal Republic of Germany has been enacted to replace the covering cost prices by various forms of payment. On the basis of the Godesberg Diagnosis and Therapy Catalogue, a new system has been developed that assesses all new implications of the care benefit law. With the help of intelligent plausibility tests, a particular case (PC) or a special rate (SR) is suggested. The documentation system works without ICPM numbers. The conversion of diagnosis and therapies to ICD-10/ICPM numbers is possible. The results of the first half of 1995 and the second half of 1995 show that only two-fifths of operations can be assessed with PC or SR. Neither emphasis on certain operations nor the more differentiated illnesses are recognised as extra costs by the GSG regulations. Complete and correct documentation is achieved by a strict and stratified control system.


Subject(s)
Diagnosis-Related Groups/legislation & jurisprudence , Fees, Medical/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/instrumentation , National Health Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , Operating Room Information Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , Reimbursement Mechanisms/legislation & jurisprudence , Computer Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Humans , Program Evaluation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...