Clinical profile and challenges faced in the management of optic neuritis: the Indian scenario.

PURPOSE: Optic neuritis (ON) is a relatively common ophthalmic disease that has recently received renewed attention owing to immunological breakthroughs. We studied the profile of patients with ON with special reference to antibody-mediated ON and the challenges faced in its management. METHODS: Case records of patients with ON presenting to a tertiary eye-care center in South India were analyzed. Data on demographics, presenting visual acuity (VA), clinical features, seropositivity for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein immunoglobulin G (MOG-IgG), details of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of orbits and brain, and treatment were collected. RESULTS: Among 138 cases with acute ON, male: female ratio was 1:2. Isolated ON was present in 41.3% of cases. Antibody testing of sera was performed in 68 patients only due to financial limitations. Among these, 48.5% were MOG-IgG-seropositive, 11.76% were AQP4-IgG-seropositive, and 30.88% samples were double seronegative. Other causes included multiple sclerosis (n = 4), lactational ON (n = 4), tuberculosis (n = 2), invasive perineuritis (n = 2), COVID-19 vaccination (n = 2), and COVID-19 (n = 1). The mean presenting best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.31 ± 1.16 logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). The mean BCVA at 3 months was 0.167 ± 0.46 logMAR. Only initial VA ≤ 'Counting fingers' (CF) had a significant association with the visual outcome for final VA worse than CF. The steep cost of investigations and treatment posed challenges for many patients in the management of ON. CONCLUSION: MOG-IgG-associated ON is common in India. Unfortunately, financial constraints delay the diagnosis and timely management of ON, adversely affecting the outcome.

Efficacy and comparison of corticosteroids only and corticosteroids with plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of optic neuritis in demyelinating disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of treatment of optic neuritis (ON) with corticosteroids (CTC) alone, CTC+plasmapheresis (PLP), and CTC+intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). DESIGN: After an episode of ON, although visual recovery is usually good, some patients may have significant visual sequelae. While the efficacy of first-line CTC is now indisputable, there is no consensus on the nature of second-line treatment. To date, no systematic review has compared the efficacy of treatment of ON with CTC alone, CTC+plasmapheresis (PLP), and CTC+intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). A meta-analysis is needed to compare the efficacy of PLP and IVIG in steroid-resistant ON. METHODS: This systematic review included all studies comparing at least two of the three treatments for steroid-resistant ON (CTC alone, CTC+PLP, and CTC+IVIG). From all articles published on PubMed between January 2000 and June 2022, two independent ophthalmologists selected studies of interest using the PRISMA method. Methodology, patient characteristics, and outcomes were identified. A network metaanalysis was then performed to compare the efficacy of the three treatments. RESULTS: Six comparative studies were included, representing 209 patients. The percentage of significant visual recovery after CTC alone, CTC+PLP, and CTC+IVIG in the acute treatment of steroid-resistant ON was 30 %, 45 %, and 77 %, respectively. Comparison of CTC+IVIG vs CTC alone, CTC+PLP vs CTC only, and CTC+PLP vs CTC+IVIG yielded odds ratios of 12.81, 2.47, and 0.19 respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment of steroid-resistant ON with CTC+PLP or CTC+IVIG is more effective than treatment with CTC alone. Although no study has directly compared the two treatments, IVIG may be more effective than PLP.

Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domains for optic neuritis: a bibliometric research from 2013 to 2022.

PURPOSE: To explore the global research trends, hotspots and frontiers of optic neuritis (ON) over the past decade through qualitative and quantitative analysis of bibliometrics. METHODS: Publications on ON from 2013 to 2022 were retrieved from Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). VOSviewer and CiteSpace were mainly used to facilitate bibliometric analysis and visualization. RESULTS: A total of 3027 papers were retrieved from peer-reviewed publications and the annual research output increased over time. Neurosciences neurology was the most published area. The USA was the most productive and influential country, and in the focus of international cooperation. University College London was the most productive organization and Charite Medical University of Berlin had the largest number of cooperating partners. Paul F contributed the largest number of publications and Wingerchuk DM ranked first among the co-cited authors. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders was the most prolific journal publishing ON research. The most co-cited references mainly focused on the diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS). The keywords formed the following four clusters: the pathophysiology of MS-ON; the autoantibody markers and diagnostic criteria of NMOSD-ON and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein associated disorder-ON (MOGAD-ON); the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of ON; and the treatment of ON. CONCLUSION: This bibliometrics analysis showed a systematic view of the evolutionary process, research hotspots, and future directions of ON research. It can provide insights for ON research and valuable information for neuro-ophthalmologic specialists to evaluate research policies and promote international cooperation.

Evidence-based management of optic neuritis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Optic neuritis can result from several distinct causes, including multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD), when not idiopathic. This review discusses evidence-based treatment approaches contingent upon each specific cause of optic neuritis. RECENT FINDINGS: Current evidence highlights the need for prompt plasmapheresis as adjunct to intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) in patients with NMOSD-associated optic neuritis. Recent advances have included a proliferation of novel disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for long-term management of NMOSD and an understanding of how existing therapeutic options can be leveraged to optimally treat MOGAD. SUMMARY: In acute idiopathic or MS-associated optic neuritis, IVMP hastens visual recovery, though it does not substantially affect final visual outcomes. IVMP and adjunctive plasmapheresis are beneficial in the treatment of NMOSD-associated optic neuritis, with a shorter time-to-treatment associated with a higher likelihood of recovery. The natural history of untreated MOGAD-associated optic neuritis is unclear but treatment with IVMP is near-universal given phenotypic similarities with NMOSD. Long-term immunosuppressive therapy is warranted in patients with NMOSD as well as in patients with MOGAD with poor visual recovery or recurrent attacks.

Uncovering the Genetics and Physiology behind Optic Neuritis.

Optic neuritis (ON) is an inflammatory condition affecting the optic nerve, leading to vision impairment and potential vision loss. This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current understanding of ON, including its definition, epidemiology, physiology, genetics, molecular pathways, therapy, ongoing clinical studies, and future perspectives. ON is characterized by inflammation of the optic nerve, often resulting from an autoimmune response. Epidemiological studies have shown a higher incidence in females and an association with certain genetic factors. The physiology of ON involves an immune-mediated attack on the myelin sheath surrounding the optic nerve, leading to demyelination and subsequent impairment of nerve signal transmission. This inflammatory process involves various molecular pathways, including the activation of immune cells and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Genetic factors play a significant role in the susceptibility to ON. Several genes involved in immune regulation and myelin maintenance have been implicated in the disease pathogenesis. Understanding the genetic basis can provide insights into disease mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. Therapy for ON focuses on reducing inflammation and promoting nerve regeneration. Future perspectives involve personalized medicine approaches based on genetic profiling, regenerative therapies to repair damaged myelin, and the development of neuroprotective strategies. Advancements in understanding molecular pathways, genetics, and diagnostic tools offer new opportunities for targeted therapies and improved patient outcomes in the future.

Pathogenesis, Clinical Features, and Treatment of Patients with Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG) Autoantibody-Associated Disorders Focusing on Optic Neuritis with Consideration of Autoantibody-Binding Sites: A Review.

Although there is a substantial amount of data on the clinical characteristics, diagnostic criteria, and pathogenesis of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) autoantibody-associated disease (MOGAD), there is still uncertainty regarding the MOG protein function and the pathogenicity of anti-MOG autoantibodies in this disease. It is important to note that the disease characteristics, immunopathology, and treatment response of MOGAD patients differ from those of anti-aquaporin 4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs) and multiple sclerosis (MS). The clinical phenotypes of MOGAD are varied and can include acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, transverse myelitis, cerebral cortical encephalitis, brainstem or cerebellar symptoms, and optic neuritis. The frequency of optic neuritis suggests that the optic nerve is the most vulnerable lesion in MOGAD. During the acute stage, the optic nerve shows significant swelling with severe visual symptoms, and an MRI of the optic nerve and brain lesion tends to show an edematous appearance. These features can be alleviated with early extensive immune therapy, which may suggest that the initial attack of anti-MOG autoantibodies could target the structures on the blood-brain barrier or vessel membrane before reaching MOG protein on myelin or oligodendrocytes. To understand the pathogenesis of MOGAD, proper animal models are crucial. However, anti-MOG autoantibodies isolated from patients with MOGAD do not recognize mouse MOG efficiently. Several studies have identified two MOG epitopes that exhibit strong affinity with human anti-MOG autoantibodies, particularly those isolated from patients with the optic neuritis phenotype. Nonetheless, the relations between epitopes on MOG protein remain unclear and need to be identified in the future.

An update on optic neuritis.

Optic neuritis (ON) is the most common cause of subacute optic neuropathy in young adults. Although most cases of optic neuritis (ON) are classified as typical, meaning idiopathic or associated with multiple sclerosis, there is a growing understanding of atypical forms of optic neuritis such as antibody mediated aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and the recently described entity, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). Differentiating typical ON from atypical ON is important because they have different prognoses and treatments. Findings of atypical ON, including severe vision loss with poor recovery with steroids or steroid dependence, prominent optic disc edema, bilateral vision loss, and childhood or late adult onset, should prompt serologic testing for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG. Although the traditional division of typical and atypical ON can be helpful, it should be noted that there can be severe presentations of otherwise typical ON and mild presentations of atypical ON that blur these traditional lines. Rare causes of autoimmune optic neuropathies, such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and collapsin response-mediator protein 5 (CRMP5) autoimmunity also should be considered in patients with bilateral painless optic neuropathy associated with optic disc edema, especially if there are other accompanying suggestive neurologic symptoms/signs. Typical ON usually recovers well without treatment, though recovery may be expedited by steroids. Atypical ON is usually treated with intravenous steroids, and some forms, such as NMOSD, often require plasma exchange for acute attacks and long-term immunosuppressive therapy to prevent relapses. Since treatment is tailored to the cause of the ON, elucidating the etiology of the ON is of the utmost importance.

Plasma exchange for acute optic neuritis in neuromyelitis optica or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To appraise whether plasma exchange (PLEX) effectively improves visual function for acute optic neuritis (ON) in neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, ProQuest Central, and Web of Science to identify relevant articles published between 2006 and 2020.Eligible studies were in English and evaluated visual outcomes for people with acute ON in NMO or NMOSD treated with PLEX. They also had adequate pre- and posttreatment data. Excluded were studies with 1 or 2 case reports, or incomplete data. RESULTS: Twelve studies were qualitatively synthesized (1 RCT; 1 controlled NRSI; 10 observational studies). Five before-and-after observational studies were used for quantitative synthesis. The PLEX in the 5 studies (3 to 7 cycles over 2 to 3 weeks) was performed as second-line or adjunctive therapy for acute ON in NMO/NMOSD.The qualitative synthesis revealed that visual-acuity recovery occurred between one day and 6 months after the first PLEX cycle completion. Thirty-two of 48 participants in the 5 quantitative-synthesis studies received PLEX. Relative to pre-PLEX values, visual-acuity improvements were nonsignificant at these post-PLEX time points: 1 day (SMD 0.611; 95% CI -0.620 to 1.842); 2 weeks (SMD 0.0214; 95% CI -1.250 to 1.293); 3 months (SMD 1.014; 95% CI -0.954 to 2.982); and 6 months (SMD 0.450; 95% CI -2.643 to 3.543). CONCLUSIONS: There were inadequate data to determine whether PLEX effectively treats acute ON in NMO/NMOSD.

Aggregate current data of this systematic review is insufficient to definitively conclude whether therapeutic PLEX is effective in improving VA in cases of NMO or NMOSD.

Neuro-Ophthalmic Visual Impairment in the Setting of COVID-19.

We set out to describe in detail the afferent neuro-ophthalmological complications that have been reported in association with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. We describe and elaborate on mechanisms of disease, including para-infectious inflammation, hypercoagulability, endothelial damage, and direct neurotropic viral invasion. Despite global vaccination programs, new variants of COVID-19 continue to pose an international threat, and patients with rare neuro-ophthalmic complications are likely to continue to present for care.Afferent complications from COVID-19 include homonymous visual field loss, with or without higher cortical visual syndromes, resulting from stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy. Optic neuritis has frequently been reported, sometimes along with acute disseminated encephalomyelopathy, often in association with either myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG) or less commonly aquaporin-4 seropositivity or in newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis. Ischemic optic neuropathy has rarely been reported. Papilledema, resulting either from venous sinus thrombosis or idiopathic intracranial hypertension in the setting of COVID-19, has also been described.Observed afferent neuro-ophthalmic associations need to be confirmed though larger comparative studies. Meanwhile, the range of possible complications should be recognized by neurologists and ophthalmologists alike, to facilitate faster diagnosis and treatment of both COVID-19 and its neuro-ophthalmic manifestations.

[Optic neuropathies as an interdisciplinary subject of research]. / Opticheskie neiropatii kak predmet mezhdistsiplinarnogo izucheniya.

Despite the wide range of clinical, instrumental and laboratory methods used in modern ophthalmology, the problem of diagnosing optic neuropathy and identifying its etiology remains relevant. A complex multidisciplinary approach involving various specialists is required in the differential diagnosis of immune-mediated optic neuritis, for example in multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, and MOG-associated diseases. Of special interest is differential diagnosis of optic neuropathy in demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system, hereditary optic neuropathies and ischemic optic neuropathy. The article presents a summary of scientific and practical results of differential diagnosis of optic neuropathies with various etiologies. Timely diagnosis and early therapy start reduces the degree of disability in patients with optic neuropathies of different etiologies.

The Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis.

Despite the high incidence of optic neuritis (ON), and the growing number of therapeutic options for the long-term treatment of diseases associated with ON including multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and MOG antibody associated disease (MOGAD), there are still only limited therapeutic options for treating an acute event of optic neuritis. These include steroids, plasma exchange (PLEX) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). High-dose steroids remain the mainstay of acute treatment. However, evidence is emerging that when optic neuritis is accompanied with certain atypical features that suggest a more unfavorable outcome this mandates special consideration such as early addition of other therapeutic agents or tapering the steroid very slowly. This review will distinguish between typical and atypical neuritis and discuss acute treatment options.

Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for future clinical trials in adult patients with optic neuritis.

OBJECTIVE: To search for and critically appraise the psychometric quality of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) developed or validated in optic neuritis, in order to support high-quality research and care. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE(Ovid), Embase(Ovid), PsycINFO(Ovid) and CINAHLPlus(EBSCO), and additional grey literature to November 2021, to identify PROM development or validation studies applicable to optic neuritis associated with any systemic or neurologic disease in adults. We included instruments developed using classic test theory or Rasch analysis approaches. We used established quality criteria to assess content development, validity, reliability, and responsiveness, grading multiple domains from A (high quality) to C (low quality). RESULTS: From 3142 screened abstracts we identified five PROM instruments potentially applicable to optic neuritis: three differing versions of the National Eye Institute (NEI)-Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ): the 51-item VFQ; the 25-item VFQ and a 10-item neuro-ophthalmology supplement; and the Impact of Visual Impairment Scale (IVIS), a constituent of the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Inventory (MSQLI) handbook, derived from the Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS). Psychometric appraisal revealed the NEI-VFQ-51 and 10-item neuro module had some relevant content development but weak psychometric development, and the FAMS had stronger psychometric development using Rasch Analysis, but was only somewhat relevant to optic neuritis. We identified no content or psychometric development for IVIS. CONCLUSION: There is unmet need for a PROM with strong content and psychometric development applicable to optic neuritis for use in virtual care pathways and clinical trials to support drug marketing authorisation.

Visual Outcomes Following Plasma Exchange for Optic Neuritis: An International Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of 395 Optic Neuritis Attacks.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of plasma exchange (PLEX) for optic neuritis (ON). METHODS: We conducted an international multicenter retrospective study evaluating the outcomes of ON following PLEX. Outcomes were compared to raw data from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) using a matched subset. RESULTS: A total of 395 ON attack treated with PLEX from 317 patients were evaluated. The median age was 37 years (range 9-75), and 71% were female. Causes of ON included multiple sclerosis (108), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) (92), aquaporin-4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4+NMOSD) (75), seronegative-NMOSD (34), idiopathic (83), and other (3). Median time from onset of vision loss to PLEX was 2.6 weeks (interquartile range [IQR], 1.4-4.0). Median visual acuity (VA) at the time of PLEX was count fingers (IQR, 20/200-hand motion), and median final VA was 20/25 (IQR, 20/20-20/60) with no differences among etiologies except MOGAD-ON, which had better outcomes. In 81 (20.5%) ON attacks, the final VA was 20/200 or worse. Patients with poor outcomes were older (P = .002), had worse VA at the time of PLEX (P < .001), and longer delay to PLEX (P < .001). In comparison with the ONTT subset with severe corticosteroid-unresponsive ON, a final VA of worse than 20/40 occurred in 6 of 50 (12%) PLEX-treated ON vs 7 of 19 (37%) from the ONTT treated with intravenous methylprednisolone without PLEX (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Most ON attacks improved with PLEX, and outcomes were better than attacks with similar severity in the ONTT. The presence of severe vision loss at nadir, older age, and longer delay to PLEX predicted a worse outcome whereas MOGAD-ON had a more favorable prognosis. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Optic neuritis: current challenges in diagnosis and management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The primary aim of this review is to describe the clinical course, salient imaging features, and relevant serological profiles of common optic neuritis (ON) subtypes. Key diagnostic challenges and treatment options will also be discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: ON is a broad term that describes an inflammatory optic nerve injury arising from a variety of potential causes. ON can occur sporadically, however there is particular concern for co-associated central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory syndromes including multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optic spectrum disorders (NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody associated disease (MOGAD). The ON subtypes that often herald MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD differ with respect to serological antibody profile and neuroimaging characteristics, yet there is significant overlap in their clinical presentations. A discerning history and thorough examination are critical to rendering the correct diagnosis. SUMMARY: Optic neuritis subtypes vary with respect to their long-term prognosis and accordingly, require different acute treatment strategies. Moreover, delays in identifying MOGAD, and certainly NMOSD, can be highly detrimental because affected individuals are vulnerable to permanent vision loss and neurologic disability from relapses.

Optic neuritis and autoimmune optic neuropathies: advances in diagnosis and treatment.

Optic neuritis is an inflammatory optic neuropathy that is commonly indicative of autoimmune neurological disorders including multiple sclerosis, myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease, and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Early clinical recognition of optic neuritis is important in determining the potential aetiology, which has bearing on prognosis and treatment. Regaining high-contrast visual acuity is common in people with idiopathic optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis-associated optic neuritis; however, residual deficits in contrast sensitivity, binocular vision, and motion perception might impair vision-specific quality-of-life metrics. In contrast, recovery of visual acuity can be poorer and optic nerve atrophy more severe in individuals who are seropositive for antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, AQP4, and CRMP5 than in individuals with typical optic neuritis from idiopathic or multiple-sclerosis associated optic neuritis. Key clinical, imaging, and laboratory findings differentiate these disorders, allowing clinicians to focus their diagnostic studies and optimise acute and preventive treatments. Guided by early and accurate diagnosis of optic neuritis subtypes, the timely use of high-dose corticosteroids and, in some instances, plasmapheresis could prevent loss of high-contrast vision, improve contrast sensitivity, and preserve colour vision and visual fields. Advancements in our knowledge, diagnosis, and treatment of optic neuritis will ultimately improve our understanding of autoimmune neurological disorders, improve clinical trial design, and spearhead therapeutic innovation.

[Typical and atypical optic neuritis]. / Tipichnyi i atipichnyi opticheskii nevrit.

Optic neuritis (ON) is one of the most common neuro-ophthalmic causes of vision loss worldwide. Demyelinating ON can be idiopathic or be one of the symptoms of autoimmune demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) such as multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). Demographic, clinical and radiological signs of ON in these CNS diseases have differences. In this regard, typical and atypical ON are currently distinguished. Recognizing the clinical features that differentiate typical MS-associated ON from atypical ON in NMOSD and MOGAD is important for choosing the correct disease management and treatment strategy. This review summarizes the data from clinical, laboratory, instrumental methods of management used for the differential diagnosis of optic neuritis.

[Update on B cell depletion therapy for demyelinating optic neuritis with disease-specific antibody].

Demyelinating optic neuritis coexisting with seropositive aquaporin-4 antibody or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody is different from the typical optic neuritis in immunopathological, clinical and radiological features, as well as therapeutic response. Due to the high recurrence rate and the potential risk of blindness, immunosuppressive therapy is warranted in most cases. The current review tracks and summarizes both the update and the potential controversies of B cell depletion therapy with a special focus on rituximab for demyelinating optic neuritis to optimize clinical decision-making.

[OPTIC NEURITIS - CLASSIFICATION, MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT].

INTRODUCTION: Optic neuritis is an inflammatory condition of the optic nerve, frequently the first manifestation of a central nervous system disease. While typical optic neuritis is strongly associated with multiple sclerosis, the etiology of atypical optic neuritis varies. The visual and the systemic prognosis, as well as the management depend on the suspected etiology. The understanding and the classification of atypical optic neuritis evolved significantly since the discovery of the anti-aquaporin4 (AQP4) and the anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies as biomarkers and pathologic causes of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and MOG-associated disorder (MOGAD) respectively. Additional causes of optic neuritis include multiple autoimmune and infectious diseases. About one third of optic neuritis cases are idiopathic. Correct and timely diagnosis of the optic neuritis etiology is crucial for proper treatment initiation and for reducing long term visual and systemic disability.

Transcranial direct current stimulation as a preventive treatment in multiple sclerosis? Preclinical evidence.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, presenting with optic neuritis in about 20-30% of cases. Optic nerve demyelination, associated with delay of visual evoked potentials (VEPs), is also observed prior to motor signs in the preclinical MS model Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), inducing polarity-dependent changes in neuronal excitability, is widely used to promote neuroplasticity in several neurological disorders. However, its potential effects on inflammation and demyelination are largely unknown. We tested the effectiveness of a preventive, 5-day tDCS treatment started 3 days post-immunization, in reducing the severity of VEP delays observed in early EAE. In mice undergoing cathodal tDCS (n = 6/26 eyes) VEPs were significantly less delayed compared with eyes from EAE-Sham (n = 24/32 eyes) and EAE-Anodal (n = 22/32 eyes). Optic nerve immunohistochemistry revealed a significantly lower cell density of microglia/macrophages, and less axonal loss in EAE-Cathodal vs EAE-Sham and EAE-Anodal, while the percent demyelination with Luxol-fast blue staining was comparable among EAE groups. Considering the latter result, immunofluorescence paranodal staining was performed, revealing a significantly higher number of complete paranode domains in EAE-Cathodal, closer to healthy mice, compared with EAE-Sham and EAE-Anodal groups. These results were reflected by the negative correlation between the number of complete paranode domains and VEP latency increase with respect to pre-immunization. Finally, cathodal tDCS was associated with a lower number, closer to healthy, of single paranodes in contrast to EAE-Sham. The effects of cathodal stimulation in preventing VEPs delays and optic nerve myelin damage were already observed in the pre-motor onset EAE stage, and were associated with a lower density of inflammatory cells. These findings suggest that tDCS may exert an anti-inflammatory effect with potential therapeutic application to be further explored in autoimmune demyelinating diseases.

Update on glial antibody-mediated optic neuritis.

Optic neuritis (ON) refers to inflammatory demyelinating lesions of the optic nerve, which can cause acute or subacute vision loss and is a major cause of vision loss in young adults. Much of our understanding of typical ON is from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Glial autoantibodies to aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin (AQP4-IgG) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein immunoglobulin (MOG-IgG) are recently established biomarkers of ON that have revolutionized our understanding of atypical ON. The detection of glial antibodies is helpful in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with different types of ON. AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG screening is strongly recommended for patients with atypical ON. Research on the pathogenesis of NMOSD and MOGAD will promote the development and marketing of targeted immunotherapies. The application of new and efficient drugs, such as the selective complement C5 inhibitor, IL-6 receptor inhibitor, B cell-depleting agents, and drugs against other monoclonal antibodies, provides additional medical evidence. This review provides information on the diagnosis and management of glial antibody-mediated ON.