A Delphi study to identify and assess professional competencies in the education of optometrists

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify, assess, and reach a consensus on the professional competencies that optometrists must acquire during their undergraduate training at the University of Valladolid. The results obtained may be useful in the revision of the current curriculum.MethodsA three round Delphi study was carried out with the participation of 116 participants grouped in 7 panels. In the first round, competencies were identified through an open-ended question and their frequency calculated. In the successive 2nd and 3rd rounds, the consensus and stability of each competency was established.ResultsA total of 56 professional competencies were identified, with 43 of them (77%) achieving a consensus among participants, of which the highest scores were obtained by the competencies that correspond to health functions of primary visual care. Out of the 13 competencies without consensus, for 11 of them this was due to the significant differences in assessment among the consulted participants; for 8 competencies (14%) response stability was found, while neither consensus nor stability were reached in 5 (9%) of the identified competencies.ConclusionsThe results obtained with this Delphi study provide a set of relevant competencies for updating the curriculum of the university Degree in Optics and Optometry at the University of Valladolid, improving its suitability to current and future professional reality. (AU)

Training results in increased practitioner confidence and identification of depression in people with low vision: a mixed methods study.

PURPOSE: The prevalence of depression in people with low vision is high and often goes undiagnosed. There is the potential for those who provide low vision services to perform concurrent depression screening. However, prior training in depression identification and suitable referral pathways is required. The aims of this study were: (1) to assess the impact of a training programme on practitioners' confidence and behaviour in addressing depression in patients with low vision, and (2) to review the training programme and identify areas for further development. METHODS: A convergent mixed methods approach was used. Questionnaires were completed by practitioners pre-, immediately post- and 6 months post- training (n = 40) to assess practitioner confidence in approaching depression in patients with low vision. Qualitative interviews were performed with a subset of practitioners 6 months post-training (n = 9). Additionally, routine data from the Low Vision Service Wales (LVSW) database was used to determine the change in the number of practitioners identifying depression in patients, and the change in the number of patients identified at risk of depression 6 months post-training. RESULTS: Of the 148 practitioners who completed low vision assessments pre- and post-training, 28 (18.9%) documented risk of depression in their patients pre-training, which increased substantially to 65 (43.9%) post-training (p < 0.0001). Mixed methods analysis confirmed increased documentation of depressive symptoms by practitioners. Practitioner confidence increased following training, with 92.3% feeling more confident to approach emotional issues with patients and 92.2% intending to use the recommended screening tool to identify depression. Interviews provided insight into areas where confidence was still lacking. Quantitative questionnaires revealed that training content was considered appropriate by 91% of participants. Interviews confirmed these findings while expanding upon possibilities for programme improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Training for depression screening was found to be time-efficient and acceptable for LVSW practitioners and shown to increase practitioner confidence in the identification of depression. Additionally, the programme changed behaviour, resulting in an increase in the identification of depression in patients with low vision. However, this is a complex topic and ongoing development is required to embed depression screening as an integral part of low vision services.

Effects of Quality Improvement Education in Diabetic Retinopathy on Routine Clinical Practice Patterns of Optometrists.

SIGNIFICANCE: Optometrists play a preventive role in diabetic care by detecting early signs of diabetic retinopathy (DR), a leading cause of blindness in adults. This study demonstrates that additional training can improve optometrists' ability to assess the presence and severity of DR in individuals with diabetes. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the impact of a quality improvement intervention involving education, assessment, and feedback on improving the evaluation and referral patterns of optometrists with regard to their patients with diabetes. METHODS: A pre-interventional and post-interventional analysis of optometrist practices was conducted through a retrospective chart review of diabetic patient encounters from July 2018 to March 2019. Dilated fundus examination (DFE) documentation, follow-up scheduling, referral practices, and usage of various imaging modalities were collected from patient records. Concordance of DR severity recordings between DFE findings, assessment and plan notes, and International Classification of Diseases codes was calculated. RESULTS: After intervention, the proportion of optometrists who conducted a DFE significantly increased from 79.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.3 to 81.7%) to 84.4% (95% CI, 82.4 to 86.4%). In addition, the rate of improper follow-up instructions decreased from 13.8 (95% CI, 12.0 to 15.7%) to 10.8% (95% CI, 9.2 to 12.6%), and the decrease was significant (P = .02). Although overall referrals decreased from 19.8 (95% CI, 17.6 to 21.9%) to 14.6% (95% CI, 12.6 to 16.5%), optometrists were as likely to refer to retinal specialists. Finally, concordance between documented DFE findings, assessment and plan notes, and International Classification of Diseases codes significantly increased from 78.8 (95% CI, 76.5 to 81.0%) to 88.7% (95% CI, 86.9 to 90.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Providing optometrists education in screening and assessing DR is effective in improving diabetic patient care.

Profile of optometrists in Victoria registered in 1937 after five decades of unregulated practice.

BACKGROUND: The enactment of the Opticians Act by the Victorian parliament on 17 December 1935 transformed the standard of optometric practice in Victoria and laid the foundations for future educational advance. Previously any person could practise optometry in Victoria regardless of their qualifications or training. The Act established an Opticians Registration Board the first task of which was to register optometrists deemed competent enough to practise on the basis of their prior experience or their optometric qualifications. METHODS: This article uses the working papers of the Registration Board at the time to construct a profile of the optometrists in practice in 1936 including the number of optometrists in practice at the time, their qualifications, the extent of their prior experience, their conjoined businesses and their geographic location. RESULTS: There were 489 optometrists in practice who applied for registration in 1936 of whom 338 were subsequently registered, two-thirds on the basis of prior experience and one-third because they held an optometric qualification recognised under the Act. Eleven of them were women. Sixty-one per cent of them were solely engaged in the practice of optometry and 39 per cent practised in conjunction with another occupation, the most common of which were watchmaker, jeweller and pharmacist. Thirty-eight per cent practised in the central business district of Melbourne, 37 per cent in Melbourne suburbs and 25 per cent in regional Victoria. In 1937 the ratio of registered optometrists to population was 1:5,482. CONCLUSION: The Opticians Act of 1935 immediately lifted the competence of optometrists in practice in 1936 by refusing to register 31 per cent of those in practice who were judged to lack the necessary competence, and laid the foundations for higher educational standards in the future.

The differences between patient and optometrist experiences of contact lens hygiene education from the perspective of a Scottish university teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: Contact lens related keratitis is a frequent presentation to acute ophthalmology services. Patients often do not recall being counselled regarding the safe use of contact lenses therefore fail to comply with guidance. This study aimed to identify the content and format of advice given to patients with contact lens keratitis concerning appropriate hygiene practices, determine their compliance with this and finally characterise optometrist practices regarding contact lens advice provided to patients. METHODS: All adult patients presenting with contact lens related keratitis to the acute ophthalmology clinic were asked to complete a survey. Information was collected on lens type, format of advice received and compliance. Community optometrists were asked to complete an electronic survey on their contact lens review practices and routine patient education. RESULTS: All patients surveyed recalled counselling on initiation of contact lenses; however 12% (6/50) were given no advice on return visits. This advice was in written format for 20% (10/50) of patients on initiation increasing to 32% (16/50) on renewal. Many patients slept (22%), showered (44%) or swam (36%) in lenses. 92% cleaned their contact lenses appropriately, but cases were washed infrequently (19% of cases cleaned < monthly) or with tap water (27%). All optometrists surveyed claimed to provide advice to patients in either written or verbal format for new and returning contact lens users. 49% (16/33) of optometrists gave written advice to patients on initial contact lens fitting, but only 1/33 continued with written advice for repeat customers. CONCLUSION: This study identified that although most patients were informed of appropriate hygiene requirements, compliance was poor. Optometrists regularly provide verbal advice but do not routinely offer written support and there is a mismatch between patient recollection and self-reported optometrist practice. It is suggested that patient education needs greater emphasis and both verbal and written information should be regularly provided on initial review and follow up assessments.

Optometry in Nepalese Context: The Profession Beyond Providing Refraction Services.

Optometry is an independent profession which is specialised for providing comprehensive eye care including refraction and dispensing services, diagnosis and management of eye diseases and visual rehabilitation. In clinical settings of Nepal, optometrists are primarily recognised as refractionists and are provided with working opportunities in the same area. This report highlights other optometric services such as binocular vision, multifocal lenses, contact lenses and occupational lens design which can be provided by optometrists besides performing refraction and prescribing spectacles. Considering large proportion of optometrists with further education and being working outside the country, new specialised services can be introduced through training and workshop to the fellow optometrists so that specialised services can reach up to the public level. Keywords: Nepal; optometry; refraction services.