Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Head Neck Pathol ; 14(1): 156-165, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30972634

ABSTRACT

The use of diverse terminology may lead to inconsistent diagnosis and subsequent mistreatment of lesions within the proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL) spectrum. The objectives of this study were: (a) to measure inter-observer variability between a variety of pathologists diagnosing PVL lesions; and (b) to evaluate the impact of diverse terminologies on understanding, interpretation, and subsequent treatment planning by oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS). Six oral pathologists (OP) and six head and neck pathologists (HNP) reviewed 40 digitally scanned slides of PVL-type lesions. Inter-observer agreement on diagnoses was evaluated by Fleiss' kappa analysis. The most commonly used diagnostic terminologies were sent to ten OMFS to evaluate their resulting interpretations and potential follow-up treatment approaches. The overall means of the surgeons' responses were compared by Student t test. There was poor inter-observer agreement between pathologists on the diagnosis of PVL lesions (κ = 0.270), although there was good agreement (κ = 0.650) when diagnosing frankly malignant lesions. The lowest agreement was in diagnosing verrucous hyperplasia (VH) with/without dysplasia, atypical epithelial proliferation (AEP), and verrucous carcinoma (VC). The OMFS showed the lowest agreement on identical categories of non-malignant diagnoses, specifically VH and AEP. This study demonstrates a lack of standardized terminology and diagnostic criteria for the spectrum of PVL lesions. We recommend adopting standardized criteria and terminology, proposed and established by an expert panel white paper, to assist pathologists and clinicians in uniformly diagnosing and managing PVL spectrum lesions.


Subject(s)
Leukoplakia, Oral/diagnosis , Pathology, Clinical/standards , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Verrucous/diagnosis , Humans , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Observer Variation , Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons/standards , Pilot Projects
2.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 57(9): 929-931, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31445774

ABSTRACT

Arthroscopy is a diagnostic-therapeutic technique used in the treatment of disorders of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). The difficulties of arthroscopy lie in the manipulation of the tools, which is why training in the technique of triangulation in artificial models is essential. We developed a training system based on the techniques of arthroscopy in the TMJ, using simulators. The first simulator was a metal box containing three holes for insertion of the instruments, and the second was a human artificial model made of polymers. We found that they facilitated training in the techniques of arthroscopy, which subsequently reduced operating time and led to a better execution of skills in reality.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons/education , Arthroscopy/methods , Clinical Competence , Computer Simulation , Humans , Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons/standards , Temporomandibular Joint/surgery
3.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 143(4): 872e-879e, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30921155

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the practice of cosmetic surgery has expanded to include oral and maxillofacial surgeons. The groundwork for this scope-of-practice expansion was laid in part by the American Dental Association's definition change of the practice of dentistry. This change modified the scope of dentistry from the earlier "teeth and surrounding and supporting structures" to the maxillofacial area and beyond. A number of states adopted this new definition into legislation, giving practitioners the premise on which to perform cosmetic and other medical procedures on the face and potentially other parts of the body. This expansion has created legal and regulatory issues over scope and truth in advertising. The authors hypothesize that this is confused by a lack of federal guidelines and state-by-state variations in scope-of-practice laws for oral and maxillofacial surgeons. METHODS: This article provides a brief overview of the key legal issues and their impact on legislation in some of the battleground states. The authors review the national distribution of scope of practice for oral and maxillofacial surgeons. RESULTS: The most successful path to expanded scope for dentistry has been through control of certification and credentialing. This has marginalized medicine boards from contributory oversight, thus circumventing any arguments over practice parameters. The scope-of-practice dispute is further complicated by the existence of dual-degree oral and maxillofacial surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: With increasing demand for cosmetic surgical interventions, establishing scope-of-practice standards for single-degreed oral and maxillofacial surgeons is critically important. As physicians, the oral and maxillofacial surgery graduates of the dual M.D./D.D.S. degree programs have no such scope-of-practice restrictions. Furthermore, if plastic surgery is to effectively argue against expanded scope of practice for oral and maxillofacial surgeons, more objective data will be necessary.


Subject(s)
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons/legislation & jurisprudence , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/legislation & jurisprudence , Surgery, Plastic/legislation & jurisprudence , Accreditation , Advertising/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Competence/standards , Educational Measurement , Humans , Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons/education , Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Surgery, Plastic/education , Surgery, Plastic/standards , United States
5.
Implant Dent ; 24(5): 517-26, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26035375

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To assess the learning curve of a minimally invasive procedure for maxillary sinus floor elevation with a transcrestal approach (tSFE) and evaluate the influence of clinician's experience in implant surgery on its outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were treated by clinicians with different levels of experience in implant surgery and inexperienced with respect to the investigated tSFE technique. The initial (n = 13) and final (n = 13) groups treated by the expert clinician were compared for tSFE outcomes. Additionally, the high, moderate, and low groups (n = 20 each) treated by the expert, moderately experienced, and low experienced clinician, respectively, were compared. RESULTS: (1) No significant differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes were observed between initial and final groups; (2) high, moderate, and low groups showed substantial vertical augmentation in limited operation time with treatment outcomes being influenced by the level of experience in implant surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated technique allows for a substantial vertical augmentation at limited operation times when used by different clinicians. The extent of sinus lift (as radiographically assessed) seems to be influenced by the clinician's level of experience in implant dentistry.


Subject(s)
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/education , Sinus Floor Augmentation/methods , Clinical Competence , Dental Implantation/education , Dental Implantation/methods , Female , Humans , Learning Curve , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons/education , Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons/standards , Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Radiography, Dental
6.
PLoS One ; 9(11): e112444, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25379944

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In the present work we analyzed the hormonal (salivary Cortisol; sC), immune (salivary Immunoglobulin A; sIgA) and cardiovascular (Heart rate, HR, and systolic blood pressure, SBP) responses induced by stress conditions in oral surgeons, randomly recruited according to their expertise level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each surgeon performed three different surgical procedures with increasing degrees of technical difficulty and under time-limited conditions, to assess whether these variants may influence the risks of stress-induced secondary hypertension among the involved health professionals. sC and sIgA samples and cardiovascular function measurements were taken up before, during, and two hours after every surgery. Salivary samples and cardiovascular measurements were taken also during non-surgical days, as baseline controls. RESULTS: We observed that more experienced surgeons showed a higher stress management ability compared to those with less experience or, generally, younger, which are more exposed to the risks of developing secondary hypertension. Nevertheless, indipendently of sex and experience, oral surgeons are constantly exposed to high risks of developing stress-related diseases. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the issues addressed and the results obtained, we have highlighted the importance of the investigated stress biomarkers to monitor and to prevent stress-related pathologies among oral surgeons. This approach is aimed to emphasize the significance of these specific stress-biomarkers, which represent a powerful instrument to evaluate stress levels in oral surgeons, and that may help to reduce the most severe life-threatening risks to which they are daily exposed. In conclusion, final goal of this study is to suggest an useful guideline to monitor the stress levels of oral and maxillofacial surgeons in order to improve their quality of life, which is inevitably reflected on the quality of the performances provided and, finally, to prevent possible mistakes in their daily activities.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Oral Surgical Procedures/psychology , Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons/psychology , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Adult , Blood Pressure , Female , Heart Rate , Humans , Hydrocortisone/analysis , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/etiology , Immunoglobulin A/analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Health , Oral Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Oral Surgical Procedures/methods , Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons/classification , Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons/standards , Random Allocation , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Saliva/chemistry , Stress, Psychological/etiology
7.
J Prosthet Dent ; 112(6): 1472-8, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24993374

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Studies of guided implant surgery have identified various methods that could influence accuracy. The present investigation was designed to limit the factors contributing to accuracy and to compare the results for 5 different surgeons. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate any deviation between virtually planned and actually placed implants by 5 surgeons performing computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-guided implant surgery on duplicate plastic models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five surgeons participated in the study, and each received 5 plastic maxillary jaw models. Thus, 25 models were used for implant placement with CAD/CAM-fabricated surgical templates. Each model contained 6 implants; therefore, a total of 150 implants were placed. The virtually planned and actually placed implant positions were compared for the apex, hexagon, depth, and angle with 2 computed tomography scans that were matched with voxel-based registration software. In addition, any differences in the 4 parameters among the surgeons were statistically tested. The data were analyzed with the t test, ANOVA, and Scheffé test (α=.05). RESULTS: A statistically significant difference between the virtually planned and actually placed implant positions was observed for 3 of the 4 outcome variables (the apex, hexagon, and depth; P<.05). A statistically significant difference was also noted among all surgeons regarding the positions of the apex, depth, and angle. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide a better understanding of the differences in accuracy between surgeons when using a CAD/CAM surgical technique. There was a significant difference between the virtually planned and actually placed implant positions and between the surgeons for some of the variable parameters analyzed. The null hypothesis was thus rejected.


Subject(s)
Computer-Aided Design/statistics & numerical data , Dental Implants , Models, Anatomic , Patient Care Planning , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , User-Computer Interface , Clinical Competence/standards , Dental Implant-Abutment Design , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/instrumentation , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/statistics & numerical data , Dental Impression Technique , Equipment Design , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Maxilla/anatomy & histology , Maxilla/surgery , Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons/standards , Surface Properties , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...