Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Adhes Dent ; 12(2): 123-8, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20157673

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of the present paper was to determine the effect of different types of ionizing radiation on the bond strength of three different dentin adhesive systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty specimens of 60 human teeth (protocol number: 032/2007) sectioned mesiodistally were divided into 3 groups according to the adhesives systems used: SB (Adper Single Bond Plus), CB (Clearfil SE Bond) and AP (Adper Prompt Self-Etch). The adhesives were applied on dentin and photo-activated using LED (Lec 1000, MMoptics, 1000 mW/cm2). Customized elastomer molds (0.5 mm thickness) with three orifices of 1.2 mm diameter were placed onto the bonding areas and filled with composite resin (Filtek Z-250), which was photo-activated for 20 s. Each group was subdivided into 4 subgroups for application of the different types of ionizing radiation: ultraviolet radiation (UV), diagnostic x-ray radiation (DX), therapeutic x-ray radiation (TX) and without irradiation (control group, CG). Microshear tests were carried out (Instron, model 4411), and afterwards the modes of failure were evaluated by optical and scanning electron microscope and classified using 5 scores: adhesive failure, mixed failures with 3 significance levels, and cohesive failure. The results of the shear bond strength test were submitted to ANOVA with Tukey's test and Dunnett's test, and the data from the failure pattern evaluation were analyzed with the Mann Whitney test (p = 0.05). RESULTS: No change in bond strength of CB and AP was observed after application of the different radiation types, only SB showed increase in bond strength after UV (p = 0.0267) irradiation. The UV also changed the failure patterns of SB (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The radio-induced changes did not cause degradation of the restorations, which means that they can be exposed to these types of ionizing radiation without weakening the bond strength.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Dentin-Bonding Agents/radiation effects , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Analysis of Variance , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/radiation effects , Dental Stress Analysis , Humans , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives , Materials Testing , Organophosphates/radiation effects , Shear Strength , Statistics, Nonparametric , Ultraviolet Rays , X-Rays
2.
J Dent ; 35(12): 946-52, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17961901

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Verify the influence of radiant exposure (dose) on polymerization stress and microleakage of composite restorations using two adhesive systems. METHODS: An experimental composite (1BisGMA:1TEGDMA, 75wt.% filler) was subjected to 3, 6, 12 or 24J/cm(2) under 500mW/cm(2). Stress was measured in 1-mm height specimens placed between two glass rods (Ø=5mm) attached to a testing machine. Microleakage was assessed in cylindrical restorations (Ø=5mm, h=2mm) with enamel margins, using Adper Single Bond 2 (SB) or Adper Prompt (PR). After storage, specimens were subjected to dye penetration (50% AgNO(3)) and sectioned twice, perpendicularly. Microleakage of the 8tooth/composite interfaces was recorded in millimeters. KHN was measured at both surfaces of cylindrical specimens (Ø=5mm, 1 or 2mm height). ANOVA/Tukey test were used (alpha=0.05). KHN top and bottom were compared using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Stress increased significantly with dose (3J/cm(2): 1.4+/-0.3(c); 6J/cm(2): 4.3+/-0.5(b); 12J/cm(2): 9.3+/-0.6(a); 24J/cm(2): 9.9+/-0.7(a), in MPa). For both average and maximum microleakage, interactions were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Tooth average microleakage was influenced by the adhesive system (SB

Subject(s)
Composite Resins/radiation effects , Dental Leakage/classification , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/radiation effects , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Dental Enamel/ultrastructure , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Dentin-Bonding Agents/radiation effects , Hardness , Humans , Light , Materials Testing , Organophosphates/chemistry , Organophosphates/radiation effects , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Polyethylene Glycols/radiation effects , Polymers/chemistry , Polymethacrylic Acids/chemistry , Polymethacrylic Acids/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Silver Staining , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL