Users' perceptions and preferences towards maxillary removable orthodontic retainers: a crossover randomized clinical trial.

The aim of this study was to assess, correlate, and compare users' perceptions and preference related to maxillary removable retainers. Volunteers were recruited to use four retainer types: conventional wrap-around (CWA), wrap-around with an anterior opening (OWA), "U" wrap-around (UWA), and clear thermoplastic retainer (CT). The main outcomes were the volunteers' perceptions, evaluated with a 100-mm visual analogue scale, and their preferred retainer. The retainers were used for 21 days each (washout intervals of 7 days). Nineteen volunteers (27 ± 4.53 years) were randomly divided into four groups that used the four retainers, but with a different sequence. Perceptions were evaluated immediately after the use of each retainer and the preference at the end of the research. Repeated measures ANOVA and Friedman tests with post-hoc Tukey's test (intergroup comparisons), and Pearson and Spearman analyses (correlations between perceptions) were applied. The WA retainers did not significantly differ among themselves. The CT was rated significantly worse in speech (p ≤ 0.001), discomfort (p < 0.001), and occlusal interference (p < 0.001), and did not significantly differ from the others in esthetics. Users preferred significant more the WA retainers in comparison with the CT retainers. The occlusal interference caused by the CT was positively correlated to other perceptions, such as changes in speech and discomfort. WA retainers presented similar preference and perceptions, but were significantly better than the CT. The CT occlusal coverage appeared to be the primary cause of its rejection.

Users' perceptions and preferences towards maxillary removable orthodontic retainers: a crossover randomized clinical trial

Abstract The aim of this study was to assess, correlate, and compare users' perceptions and preference related to maxillary removable retainers. Volunteers were recruited to use four retainer types: conventional wrap-around (CWA), wrap-around with an anterior opening (OWA), "U" wrap-around (UWA), and clear thermoplastic retainer (CT). The main outcomes were the volunteers' perceptions, evaluated with a 100-mm visual analogue scale, and their preferred retainer. The retainers were used for 21 days each (washout intervals of 7 days). Nineteen volunteers (27 ± 4.53 years) were randomly divided into four groups that used the four retainers, but with a different sequence. Perceptions were evaluated immediately after the use of each retainer and the preference at the end of the research. Repeated measures ANOVA and Friedman tests with post-hoc Tukey's test (intergroup comparisons), and Pearson and Spearman analyses (correlations between perceptions) were applied. The WA retainers did not significantly differ among themselves. The CT was rated significantly worse in speech (p ≤ 0.001), discomfort (p < 0.001), and occlusal interference (p < 0.001), and did not significantly differ from the others in esthetics. Users preferred significant more the WA retainers in comparison with the CT retainers. The occlusal interference caused by the CT was positively correlated to other perceptions, such as changes in speech and discomfort. WA retainers presented similar preference and perceptions, but were significantly better than the CT. The CT occlusal coverage appeared to be the primary cause of its rejection.

Objective vs subjective analyses of arch form and preformed archwire selection.

INTRODUCTION: Maintaining a patient's original arch form increases treatment stability. In this study, we assessed the agreement between subjective analyses of arch form and archwire selection by orthodontists and an objective method with Cast Analyzer Iranian X software (Khallaghane Mehr, Tehran, Iran). METHODS: Thirty-six casts with normal occlusion were scanned with a laser. The software generated the best-fit curve using a fourth-degree polynomial equation to the clinical bracket points on the casts; then it selected the best preformed nickel-titanium archwire based on the root mean square calculation either objectively or semiobjectively. Three orthodontists selected the best-fit curve and archwire subjectively using the casts. To assess intraexaminer reliability, the same orthodontists reevaluated 10 casts after 2 weeks. To assess interexaminer reliability, the 3 orthodontists performed the analyses with the software and on the casts. Agreements were evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient and Dahlberg's formula. RESULTS: The semiobjective method (visual selection of wire by orthodontists using the software) yielded the best results. The differences were clinically negligible between the objective (fully automated) and semiobjective methods (1.30 vs 1.36 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The objective method improved wire adaptation to the clinical bracket points. Agreement among orthodontists regarding wire selection will improve significantly when they are trained to use the software.

British Orthodontic Society national audit of temporary anchorage devices (TADs): report of the first thousand TADs placed.

OBJECTIVE: To provide data from the British Orthodontic Society (BOS) national clinical audit on temporary anchorage device (TAD) use following the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NIHCE) Design and setting: The Audit commenced on 1 January 2008 and is still ongoing. This article reports the data for TADs placed from 1 January 2008 to 1 November 2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Audit data was collected from participants using a system of both on-line data entry and hard copy forms. The criteria and standards for the audit were set following the NIHCE report in conjunction with the Development and Standards Committee of the BOS. Virtually all participants used the on-line data entry available on the BOS website. The data submitted was checked and entered manually into an Excel spreadsheet, and transferred to SPSS for analysis. RESULTS: Written information and documented discussion of risks were provided in over 90% of TADs placed, but 17.4% were placed without a specific signed consent form. Temporary anchorage device failure rate was 24.2% overall. Among failed TADs, 93.1% were lost or removed due to excess mobility. Infection or inflammation resulting in loss or removal was reported in 6% of TADs. CONCLUSIONS: The only audit standard that was met was failures due to infection of inflammation. The rest of the audit standards were not met. Recommendations are made to address these issues.

Interdisciplinary index of prosthodontic/substitution orthodontic treatment need for patients with missing teeth.

The need for treatment in cases of missing teeth may result from aesthetic demands or functional impairment, although tooth loss itself does not necessarily constitute a need for prosthetic replacement. In selected cases, restorative treatment can be replaced by tooth autotransplantation or substitution orthodontic treatment. The authors have tried to make an index based not on missing particular teeth, but on the presence of spacing requiring restoration. An attempt has been made to categorize the restorative treatment need. Orthodontic treatment was considered, when it could completely eliminate the need for prosthetic treatment. The proposed classification could be used for assessing eligibility for public refund of restorative or substitution orthodontic treatment, as well as to motivate the patients to have restorations. It should be an individual approach-based decision, which treatment: orthodontic substitution tooth movement or prosthodontic is more cost-effective for the rest of the patient's life.

Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliabilities of 3-dimensional orthodontic digital setups.

INTRODUCTION: The use of digital orthodontic setups has grown quickly. The purpose of this study was to test the interexaminer and intraexaminer reliabilities of 3-dimensional orthodontic digital setups in OrthoCAD (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif). METHODS: Six clinicians made digital orthodontic setups on 6 digital models twice, with a minimum interval of 2 weeks and a maximum interval of 4 weeks. OrthoCAD software was used, and treatment goals were all set the same according to the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS). Differences between the 72 setups were measured with the ABO-OGS scores. RESULTS: In comparing setups 1 and 2, the intraexaminer mean absolute differences in total ABO-OGS scores varied statistically significantly between 2.17 and 6.00 points. Interexaminer mean absolute differences varied statistically significantly between 4.77 and 5.56 points. All but 1 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value showed significant excellent agreement (ICC, >0.8) for intraexaminer reliability. One ICC value was insignificant and showed moderate (ICC, 0.4-0.6) agreement. Interexaminer reliability showed significant good (ICC, 0.6-0.8) agreement. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant difference in ABO-OGS score when using OrthoCAD. Although this difference was low, it could be clinically significant. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliabilities are not redundant for general use of the 3-dimensional orthodontic digital setup in OrthoCAD.

Accidental debondings: Buccal vs fully individualized lingual multibracket appliances.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the frequency and localizations of bond failures (BFs) in patients treated with either lingual (TOP-Service für Lingualtechnik GmbH, a 3M Company, Bad Essen, Germany) or buccal (Mini Diamond brackets/Accent molar tubes; Ormco, Orange, Calif) full multibracket appliances in both dental arches. METHODS: Data were acquired by an independent investigator from the patient records of 3 practitioners. To establish a standardized observation period, the first year of treatment was analyzed for each patient. Statistical analysis comprised the Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney U, and Fisher exact tests. The significance level was set at P <0.05. RESULTS: The mean number of BFs per patient in the first year of treatment did not differ significantly between the lingual group (n = 59; mean age, 31.1 years; mean BFs per patient, 2.63; SD, 2.77; minimum, 0; maximum, 13) and the buccal group (n = 44; mean age, 15.14 years; mean BFs per patient, 2.61; SD, 3.41; minimum, 0; maximum, 14) (P = 0.428) or with respect to sex (lingual group, P = 0.251; buccal group, P = 0.414) or practitioner (lingual group, P = 0.755; buccal group, P = 0.060), but molar attachments were more prone to BFs than were premolar brackets (lingual group, P = 0.015; buccal group, P = 0.049), and premolar brackets were more prone to BF than anterior brackets (lingual group, P = 0.005; buccal group, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: With both appliances, a mean of 2.62 BFs per patient in the first year of treatment can be expected; this benchmark provides a reference for patient briefing, which is very important considering the large interindividual variances and budgeting considerations.

An in vivo study on the incidence and location of fracture in round orthodontic archwires.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this in vivo study was to determine the incidence and location of fracture in round nickel-titanium (NiTi) and round stainless steel orthodontic archwires, both commonly used in orthodontics. Secondarily, this study sought to determine if there is any correlation between archwire fracture and gender, diameter of the archwire, arch type (maxillary/mandibular) or bracket used. DESIGN: In vivo study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One thousand orthodontic patients (1434 archwires) were evaluated during regular treatment visits to assess archwire fracture and location. The patient's gender, age, type of archwire (round NiTi and round stainless steel), diameter of the archwire, arch type, location of fracture (anterior or posterior) and period of service before fracture were recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-square statistical test was utilized to address the frequency and the correlation between the different variables. Level of statistical significance (α) was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-five archwire failures were reported (1.7%) of the total sample size. All fractured archwires were NiTi, and 76% of the fractures were located in the posterior region. No statistical significance was found between archwire fracture and gender, arch type (maxillary/mandibular), archwire diameter or bracket type. CONCLUSION: The frequency of archwire fracture during regular orthodontic visits is very low. The most common archwire fracture site is the posterior region. NiTi wires are the most commonly fractured archwire. No statistically significant correlation exists between archwire fracture and gender, arch type, bracket type or diameter of archwire.

Nationwide survey of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion.

We aimed to gather data on the current practice of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) in the UK. Surveys were posted in the mail to all members of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (n=379) and 166 (44%) responded. In the previous year 69 responders (42%) had done at least one SARME operation. The technique used by individual surgeons may be more experience-based than evidence-based, which leads to considerable variation.

2013 survey of Australian orthodontists' procedures.

AIM: This survey of Australian orthodontists was conducted to assess treatment preferences. METHODS: Email invitations to participate in an online survey were sent to a total of 433 Australian Society of Orthodontists (ASO) members and 158 replies were received (36% response). RESULTS: For Class II treatment, most practitioners preferred to wait and treat later but when early treatment was performed, the Twin Block was the most popular appliance. For fixed appliance treatment, the 0.022 inch slot was the most commonly used (73%) and the median treatment time was 20 months. The median extraction rate was 23% which was similar to that reported in a 2008 USA survey. Sequential plastic aligners were used by 73% of respondents and Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices were used by 77%. The most common research question clinicians would like answered related to retention. CONCLUSION: The responses were similar Australia-wide but some areas of difference were revealed and discussed.

Evaluation of retention protocols among members of the American Association of Orthodontists in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Little research has been conducted to evaluate protocols and trends in orthodontic retention. The purpose of this study was to identify the general retention protocols used by orthodontists in the United States. Additionally, our goal was to identify trends in these orthodontic retention protocols by evaluating how they have changed over the past 5 years and how they might continue to change in the next 5 years. METHODS: The study was conducted via a 36-question electronic survey (REDCap, Nashville, Tenn) with branching logic on certain questions. The survey was sent to all 9143 practicing members of the American Association of Orthodontists in the United States, and 1632 (18%) responded. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Mean retention protocols of the surveyed population showed predominant use of Hawley or vacuum-formed retainers in the maxillary arch and fixed retention in the mandibular arch. For both arches, there is a current shift away from Hawley retainers and toward vacuum-formed retainers and fixed retention. Respondents who extract fewer teeth reported increased use of fixed retention in the maxillary (P = 0.041) and mandibular (P = 0.003) arches. Respondents who extract fewer teeth and use removable retainers were more likely to tell their patients to wear their retainers at night for the rest of their lives (P = 1.63 × 10(-6)).

Encuesta sobre el uso de aparatología fija autoligable e individualización de arcos a la forma de arcada del paciente en ortodoncistas españoles / Survey for Spanish orthodontists on the use of self-llgation FIXED appllances AND individualization of archwires to the patient’s arch form

El objetivo de este estudio fue conocer la situación actual en las clínicas de ortodoncia españolas en el uso de brackets autoligables así como la individualización del arco a la forma de arcada del paciente. Una encuesta online fue distribuida a ortodoncistas [N= 5111 de la Sociedad Española de Ortodoncia [SEDO]. El cuestionario consistía en tres partes, principalmente constituida con preguntas multirespuesta. Los datos fueron analizados mediante el uso de estadísticas descriptivas y los grupos se compararon usando la prueba de independencia Chi-cuadrado. Los resultados de la encuesta muestran que la mayoría de los encuestados trabajan tanto con brackets convencionales como autoligables, siendo la prescripción más utilizada en ortodoncia fija convencional Roth con un 57% y la técnica autoligable más usada Damon con un 62%. Destacaron los modelos de estudio y los registros de cera como métodos por los cuáles los ortodoncistas individualizan los arcos. A pesar de que la mayoría de los encuestados consideraron importante la individualización de los arcos a la forma de arcada del paciente, únicamente la mitad de éstos dicen individualizar los arcos en todos sus pacientes (AU)

The aim of this study was to determine the current situation in Spanish orthodontic clinics concerning the use of self-ligating brackets and the individualization of the archwire according to the palient's arch form. An online survey was distributed to orthodontists IN= 511) of the Spanish Society of Orthodontics ISEDOl. The questionnarie consisted of three parts, mainly containing multiple-choice questions. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the groups were compared using the Chi-square test of independence. The results of the survey show that most participants work with both conventional and self-ligating brackets. The most widely used prescription in conventional lixed orthodontics was Roth' s with 57%, and the most widely used technique in sell-ligating brackets was Damon' s with 62%. Dental casts and wax records were the methods favored by orthodontists that individualized archwires. Although most participants considered it important to individualize the archwires to the patient's arch form, only half reported that they individualize archwires in all patients (AU)

A survey on orthodontic retention procedures in The Netherlands.

The objective of this study was to survey retention procedures used in orthodontic practices in The Netherlands. A questionnaire was sent to all 279 orthodontists working in The Netherlands. The questionnaire consisted of six parts, mainly containing multiple-choice questions. Information as to background data on the individual orthodontist, retention in general, frequency of different types of removable or bonded retainers that were used, retention protocol, and the type and size of the wire used for bonded retainers was assessed. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 12.0.1. Tests for the relationship between two items were based on the chi-square test. The overall response rate was 91 per cent. Most orthodontists placed a bonded retainer in the upper and lower arch, except when the upper arch was expanded during treatment or when extractions were performed in the upper arch, in which case they placed a removable retainer. Opinions varied with regard to how many hours the removable retainers should be worn and the duration of the retention phase. Contraindications for bonded retainers were given by 96 per cent of the orthodontists, with poor oral hygiene being the most commonly mentioned. As far as bonded retainers were concerned, 84 per cent of the orthodontists preferred permanent retention. Fifty-nine per cent of the orthodontists believed that a practice guideline for retention after orthodontic treatment needs to be developed, which was confirmed by the varied responses in this survey.

Frictional evaluations of dental typodont models using four self-ligating designs and a conventional design.

Abstract: After a previous study using typodonts and three standardized archwire (AW) sizes, the frictional evaluations of four self-ligating brackets were directed toward the optimal AW-bracket system. Four participating manufacturers suggested three AWs, which were a representation of the three stages of orthodontic treatment, to be coupled with their respective self-ligating design. Four replicated typodont models were mounted with a self-ligating design, and a fifth model was mounted with a conventional design that served as a control. The first experiment evaluated the manufacturer-suggested AWs against the respective self-ligating design. Because no third-stage AWs could engage their respective designs, a second experiment was implemented to gain more detailed analyses of the designs. This experiment included any successful manufacturer-suggested AWs from the first experiment against the four self-ligating designs and the control design. All self-ligating designs performed with the efficiency and reproducibility associated with expectations. Specifically, self-ligation outperformed the conventional brackets when coupled with up to 0.020- x 0.020-inch wires. The clearance of the various AW sizes and alloys changed with malocclusion. Furthermore, the parameter that best correlated with drawing forces was the bending stiffness of the AW, which was directly associated with the nominal dimension of each wire. The best AW-bracket system can be selected, when taking into account the stiffness (elastic modulus and size of the AW) along with the amount of malocclusion present, once the treatment plan is determined.

Objective assessment of occlusal and coronal characteristics of untreated normals: a measurement study.

To determine whether tooth shape and position are constant within tooth types, dental casts of 68 Indians (age range, 10-32 years; mean, 18.72 years) were analyzed. The casts were selected from a larger sample and met the following criteria: Class I molar and canine relationships; overjet and overbite within normal limits; well-related vertical, transverse, and anteroposterior relationships with pleasing profiles and well-aligned arches; and no supernumerary teeth or large restorations. None of the subjects had received orthodontic treatment, and all were in good health and exhibited normal growth. Crown angulation, inclination, offset of maxillary molar, curve of Spee, crown facial prominence, horizontal crown contour, and vertical crown contour were assessed. Means, standard deviations, and standard errors were calculated. The measurements were compared with Andrews's data on 120 nonorthodontic normal occlusion casts. The Student t test was used to determine the significance of differences between the 2 sets of data. It was found that teeth of the same tooth type have similar values of horizontal and vertical crown contours. Values for inclination, angulation, and relative prominence were also similar. Hence, we concluded that tooth shape and position are constant for each tooth type. The data from this study were comparable with Andrews's findings. However, from this study, it would be safe to presume that all teeth except the maxillary second molars require alterations in the bracket base inclination value, and that the maxillary lateral incisor, canine, second premolar, and second molar, and the mandibular canine, require alterations in angulation values.