Subject(s)
Disclosure/ethics , Ethics, Dental , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/surgery , Mandibular Advancement/ethics , Medical Errors/ethics , Orthodontics/ethics , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Osteotomy, Le Fort/ethics , Dentist-Patient Relations/ethics , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral CollaborationABSTRACT
The literature shows that the indications for orthognathic surgery (OS) are often functional problems and unsatisfactory facial esthetics. This study investigated the esthetic outcomes and overall satisfaction following OS. Somatosensory change is a relatively common complication and its influence on the level of satisfaction was studied. The social-networking web site Facebook was used to identify the study population. An online questionnaire was performed using the website SurveyMonkey. In all, 105 (9%) respondents from the Danish Facebook group about OS, called Kaebeoperation (jaw surgery), were enrolled in the study. The respondents consisted of 12 men and 93 women, with a mean age of 27â±â9 years. Fifty-four percent replied that esthetic concerns were the reason for the OS. Eighty-four percent reported improvement in facial esthetics after the OS. Men indicated a higher degree of improvement in beauty than women (Pâ=â0.030). Sixty-four percent replied that their attractiveness had been increased after OS. Eighty-six percent were happy with the results and 89% would recommend the surgery to others in need. No significant differences in esthetic results and satisfaction were seen with regard to sex, age, and somatosensory change. High satisfaction and improvement in facial esthetic after OS were seen. Young patients (16-25 years) and men indicated a higher degree of satisfaction than old (>25 years) patients and women. The use of social media seems to be an interesting platform for qualitative scientific research in certain age groups. Further prospective and objective studies about the esthetic improvement after OS should be performed.
Subject(s)
Beauty , Esthetics, Dental/psychology , Orthognathic Surgery , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Social Support , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Denmark , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
Evaluating risks is part of the day-to-day practice of all orthodontists. Most of the time we forget that healing a patient also requires an evaluation of what is called the psychological risk. Indeed, focusing on harmonisation matters, we tend to omit that patient's requests, especially aesthetic requests, may conceal psychological problems. Such a risk is even higher when it comes to orthodontic-surgical protocols, as the physical changes are more radical. We will discuss the specificities of aesthetical demand, its links with the social discourse and the way self-esteem and reflection in the mirror are closely intermingled. Should we forget to take into account the psychological dimension of any patient, this could be a breach of professional ethics. We will furthermore consider the means we have to recognize patients with a high psychological risk. It is not in our hands to help these patients psychologically. It is in the hands of a mental health specialist, whose adress and phone number we should know in order to refer our patients to him/her.
Subject(s)
Esthetics, Dental , Ethics, Dental , Malocclusion/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Body Dysmorphic Disorders/diagnosis , Body Image , Dentist-Patient Relations , Female , Humans , Hypochondriasis/diagnosis , Interprofessional Relations , Male , Malocclusion/therapy , Medical History Taking , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Needs Assessment , Orthodontics, Corrective/ethics , Orthodontics, Corrective/psychology , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/psychology , Psychiatry , Risk Factors , Self ConceptABSTRACT
This retrospective, observational study investigated whether published studies on the use of piezoelectric surgery (PS) in the oral and craniomaxillofacial region fulfilled the requirements of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH) with respect to human subject protections (HSP) and disclosure of financial conflicts (FC). A Medline/PUBMED search was performed in April 2008 to identify all clinical studies on PS, published in English, French and German. Disclosure of HSP (obtaining ethical approval and subjects' informed consent) and FC mentioned in the retrieved articles were analysed. 29 clinical articles were identified in 18 journals, of which 14 journals (78%) required the disclosure of both HSP and FC. Ethical approval was documented in two studies (7%); patient consent was reported in four publications (14%). Four articles disclosed no FC. 21 reports (72%) mentioned neither HSP nor FC. The relationships between funding source and study outcomes could not be identified. Most studies on the use of PS hardly adhered to the regulations recommended by the ICMJE and DoH, and do not mention HSP and FC, indicating the study results with a high degree of suspicion. It is recommended that oral and craniomaxillofacial surgery journals adhere strictly to these regulations because they carry a heavy responsibility regarding the scientific integrity of publications in this specialty.
