Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 87
Filter
1.
Clin Rheumatol ; 39(7): 2207-2217, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32088798

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Recently, several clinical prognostic factors for hip osteoarthritis (OA) progression such as spinal malalignment, reduced spinal mobility, and excessive daily cumulative hip loading have been identified. This study aimed to identify clinical phenotypes based on clinical prognostic factors in patients with secondary hip OA using data from prospective cohort studies and to define the clinical features of each phenotype. METHODS: Fifty patients participated. Two-step cluster analysis was performed to identify the phenotypes using the following potential prognostic factors for hip OA progression: spinal inclination in standing, thoracolumbar spine mobility, daily cumulative hip moment, and minimum joint space width (JSW) at baseline. Comprehensive basic and clinical features (age, body mass index, hip pain, Harris hip score, JSW, radiographic hip morphology, hip impairments, spinal alignment and mobility, and gait-related variables) and ratio of progressors in 12 months were compared among the phenotypes using bootstrap method (unadjusted and adjusted for age). RESULTS: Three phenotypes were identified and each phenotype was characterized as follows (P < 0.05): phenotype 1 (30%)-relatively young age and higher daily cumulative hip loading; phenotype 2 (42.0%)-relatively older age, reduced JSW, and less spinal mobility; and phenotype 3 (28.0%)-changed thoracic spine alignment and less spinal (especially in the thoracic spine) mobility. The ratio of progressors among the phenotypes was not statistically significantly different. These characteristics remained after adjustment for age. CONCLUSION: Three phenotypes with similar progression risk were identified. This finding will help in designing treatment tailored to each phenotype for hip OA progression prevention.Key Points• Three phenotypes with similar progression risk were identified based on clinical prognostic factors.• Phenotype 1 was characterized by young age and higher daily cumulative hip loading.• Phenotype 2 was relatively old age and had reduced JSW and less spinal mobility.• Phenotype 3 had changed thoracic spine alignment and less thoracic spine mobility.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Range of Motion, Articular , Adult , Disease Progression , Female , Gait , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Hip Joint/pathology , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/pathology , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Phenotype , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Risk Factors , Thoracic Vertebrae/physiopathology
2.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 36(2): 347-357, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29924661

ABSTRACT

Background: The prevalence and cost of hip osteoarthritis (OA) is rising. Mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT) is an orthopedic classification and treatment system based on mechanical and symptomatic response to repeated and sustained end-range movements. There has been no investigation of the association between MDT and patients diagnosed with hip OA. Case Description: This case report presents a 71-year-old female diagnosed with hip OA and matching the currently accepted clinical prediction rule (CPR) for symptomatic hip OA. The patient was classified and treated by a Diplomat of MDT and co-examiner using MDT. Outcomes: Short- and long-term (13 months) outcomes were excellent, demonstrating rapid abolishment of symptoms and improvement in function in 5 visits over 21 days. The patient demonstrated the ability to prevent and manage reoccurrence of symptoms independently; nevertheless, she received a total hip replacement which was not in accordance with current guidelines and recommendations. Conclusion: This case report raises questions about whether or not pathologies traditionally associated with the etiology of hip OA are actually at fault. Moreover, it raises questions about the utility of special tests and CPRs typically utilized to identify those structures. The case report provides preliminary evidence from one patient that MDT may be capable of providing effective short- and long-term outcomes in the management of hip OA.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteoarthritis, Hip/rehabilitation , Physical Examination , Physical Therapy Modalities , Aged , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Pain Measurement
3.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 29(4): 843-847, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30649618

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) for pain reduction in osteoarthritis (OA) is a frequently used treatment in Germany and Eastern European countries. The evidence on the effects of LDRT on pain in patients with OA remains unclear. This study evaluated the effect of LDRT on pain in patients with severe OA of the hip or knee joint. METHODS: This prospective study included a total of 16 joints in 12 patients (4 hips and 12 knees). The inclusion criteria were: patients older than 50 years, severe OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade III-IV) of the hip or knee joint, patients not responding to conservative treatment and patients who are inoperable or not willing to undergo surgery. The joint was irradiated with a total dose of 6.0 Gray. The Numeric Rating Scale for pain (NRS-pain) and patient-reported outcome measures were obtained at pre-, 6, 13, 26, 39 and 52 weeks post-radiation. A decrease of two points on the NRS-pain was defined as clinical relevant. RESULTS: The median age of the included patients was 74 years (range 58-89). In 50% of the joints (n = 8, 3 hip and 5 knee joints), a clinical relevant difference in pain at 6 weeks post-radiation was observed. This clinical relevant difference decreased to 25% at 52 weeks post-radiation. CONCLUSION: LDRT showed a clinical relevant pain relief at 6 weeks after radiotherapy. The long-term effect of LDRT, however, was limited. A randomized placebo-controlled trial is necessary to assess the effect of LDRT on pain in patients with OA of the hip or knee joint.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Hip/radiotherapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteoarthritis, Knee/classification , Pain Measurement , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Severity of Illness Index , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 26(20): e434-e436, 2018 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30134309

ABSTRACT

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has developed the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip. Evidence-based information, in conjunction with the clinical expertise of physicians, was used to develop the criteria to improve patient care and obtain best outcomes while considering the subtleties and distinctions necessary in making clinical decisions. The Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip AUC clinical patient scenarios were derived from indications typical of patients presenting with osteoarthritis of the hip in clinical practice. The 270 patient scenarios and 9 treatments were developed by the Writing Panel, a group of clinicians who are specialists in this AUC topic. Next, a separate multidisciplinary, Voting Panel (made up of specialists and nonspecialists) rated the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a 9-point scale to designate a treatment as Appropriate (median rating, 7 to 9), May Be Appropriate (median rating, 4 to 6), or Rarely Appropriate (median rating, 1 to 3).


Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy , Adult , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Risk Assessment
6.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther ; 47(6): A1-A37, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28566053

ABSTRACT

The Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) has an ongoing effort to create evidence-based practice guidelines for orthopaedic physical therapy management of patients with musculoskeletal impairments described in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The purpose of these revised clinical practice guidelines is to review recent peer-reviewed literature and make recommendations related to hip pain and mobility deficits. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(6):A1-A37. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.0301.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/diagnosis , Hip Joint , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis , Arthralgia/therapy , Disability Evaluation , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Range of Motion, Articular
7.
J Orthop Sci ; 22(5): 905-908, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28551281

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A few reports have shown that the reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association stage classification of hip osteoarthritis was not high. The objective of this study was to assess the reliability of the stage classification of coxarthrosis, and to evaluate whether a modification of the classification improves reliability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 200 hips in 100 patients with hip pain. We collected radiographs of their hip joints with the patients in both a supine and a standing position. Four orthopaedic surgeons evaluated the stage of coxarthrosis employing the JOA classification. The percentage of agreement of examiners and the value of the kappa statistic were calculated. Furthermore, to improve the reliability of classification, we modified the classification based on previous reports. Partial narrowing of the joint space and disappearance of the joint space were defined as maintained if it was 2 mm or more, and as the width of the loss of joint space that was 10 mm or more respectively. Using this classification, the same examiners assessed the stage on the same radiographs again three months after the previous evaluation. RESULTS: The percentages of agreement were 28.5% and 27% and the interobserver value of the kappa statistic was 0.45 and 0.44 in supine and standing position respectively. After modification of the classification, the percentages of agreement were 36.5% and 44% and the interobserver value of the kappa statistic was 0.48 and 0.56 in supine and standing positions respectively, and the intraobserver value of the kappa statistic was 0.55. The modification significantly improved the reliability only in the percentage of the agreement for the standing position. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the reliability of the JOA stage classification of coxarthrosis was not as high as previous reports have showed. Modification of the classification improved interobserver reliability.


Subject(s)
Arthrography , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
8.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 137(1): 19-26, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27830361

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pauwels' femoral osteotomy is a classical and joint-preserving method for osteoarthritis of the hip caused by acetabular dysplasia and/or subluxation. However, its application for terminal-stage osteoarthritis of the hip, and the long-term results, have not yet been reported. We herein aim to investigate the long-term results of valgus osteotomy for terminal-stage osteoarthritis of the hip. METHODS: Eighty-two hips of 75 patients (74 women and 1 man, mean age: 48.1 years) classified as having terminal-stage osteoarthritis by Kellgren and Laurence were indicated for valgus osteotomy from 1984 to 1993. Sixty-three hips of 57 patients were followed for more than 20 years (mean: 298 months). Follow-up rate was 77%. RESULTS: Preoperative mean hip score (Harris Hip Score) was 46.4 points. Thirty-two hips were later converted to total hip arthroplasty (THA) (mean: 185 months after surgery). Of the hips without conversion to THA, 31 hips scored 72.8 points on average, and 21 hips scored 70 or more points at the final follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis revealed that 40% of the hips, classified as non-atrophic type (according to Bombelli's classification) at the time of operation, maintained their joint space width for 20 years (endpoint: less than 1 mm at the weight-bearing segment, i.e., recurrence of osteoarthritis) and also revealed that 60% of the hips were not converted for 20 years after the initial operation (endpoint: conversion to THA). Cox's proportional hazard model revealed that those with the atrophic type had a hazard risk 24 times greater than those with the non-atrophic type of osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of the long-term results of osteotomy for terminal-stage osteoarthritis of the hip showing satisfactory results with a lengthy follow-up period. Pauwels' valgus femoral osteotomy for terminal-stage osteoarthritis, excluding atrophic type, could be an acceptable alternative to THA.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Osteotomy/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Proportional Hazards Models , Treatment Outcome , Weight-Bearing
9.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 136(1): 27-33, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26566638

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Tönnis classification is widely accepted for grading hip arthritis, but its usefulness as a reference in hip-preserving surgery is yet to be demonstrated. We aimed to evaluate reproducibility of the Tönnis classification in early stages of hip osteoarthritis, and thus determine whether it is a reliable reference for hip-preserving surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three orthopaedic surgeons with different levels of experience examined 117 hip X-rays that were randomly mixed of two groups: a group of 31 candidates for hip-preserving surgery and a control group of 30 patients that were asymptomatic with respect to the hip joint. The surgeons were asked to rate an eventual osteoarthritis according to the Tönnis classification. After 2 months, the surgeons were asked to re-evaluate the X-rays in a random order. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were calculated by comparing the observers' two estimations using Kappa statistics. RESULTS: Kappa values for interobserver reliability were slight or fair (range 0.173-0.397). Kappa values for intraobserver reproducibility were fair (range 0.364-0.397). Variance in grading no and slight osteoarthritis was the most frequent cause for intra- and interobserver disagreements (76.3 and 73.01% of the non-concordant observations, respectively). The confidence interval analysis showed that the observers' experience did not affect reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: The Tönnis classification is a poor method to assess early stages of hip osteoarthritis. These findings suggest that its routine use in therapeutic decision-making for conservative hip surgery should be reconsidered.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Adult , Clinical Decision-Making , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
10.
J Orthop Res ; 33(1): 78-83, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25251583

ABSTRACT

18F-fluoride positron emission tomography (18F-fluoride PET) is a functional imaging modality used primarily to detect increased bone metabolism. Increased 18F-fluoride PET uptake suggests an association between increased bone metabolism and load stress at the subchondral level. This study therefore examined the relationship between equivalent stress distribution calculated by finite element analysis and 18F-fluoride PET uptake in patients with hip osteoarthritis. The study examined 34 hips of 17 patients who presented to our clinic with hip pain, and were diagnosed with osteoarthritis or pre-osteoarthritis. The hips with trauma, infection, or bone metastasis of cancer were excluded. Three-dimensional models of each hip were created from computed tomography data to calculate the maximum equivalent stress by finite element analysis, which was compared with the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) examined by 18F-fluoride PET. The SUVmax and equivalent stress were correlated (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ρ=0.752), and higher equivalent stress values were noted in higher SUVmax patients. The correlation between SUVmax and maximum equivalent stress in osteoarthritic hips suggests the possibility that 18F-fluoride PET detect increased bone metabolism at sites of stress concentration. This study demonstrates the correlation between mechanical stress and bone remodeling acceleration in hip osteoarthritis.


Subject(s)
Finite Element Analysis , Fluorides/metabolism , Osteoarthritis, Hip/metabolism , Positron-Emission Tomography , Severity of Illness Index , Stress, Mechanical , Adult , Bone Remodeling , Female , Fluorine Radioisotopes/metabolism , Hip Joint/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , Osteogenesis , Pain Measurement
11.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 100(6): 651-6, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25155204

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after arthroscopic femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) surgery are promising in the short-term but have rarely been evaluated in the mid-term (e.g., about 5 years). Here, our objectives were to obtain mid-term data on functional and radiographic outcomes, to identify prognostic factors, and to determine the mid-term rate of arthroplasty revision with the associated risk factors. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the results of arthroscopic FAI surgery were sustained over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective multi-surgeon study of 53 Tönnis grade 0 or 1 hips treated arthroscopically for symptomatic FAI (23 cam, 10 pincer, and 20 mixed deformities). We obtained short-term (10 months) and mid-term (4.6 years) data on the functional outcome (WOMAC and satisfaction scores), proportion of patients without revision arthroplasty, and development of osteoarthritis (graded using the Tönnis classification). RESULTS: In the patients without revision arthroplasty, the WOMAC score improved significantly (P<0.01) from baseline (61.4 ± 15.6) to 10 months (84.2 ± 15.6) and last follow-up (85.2 ± 15.5) but remained unchanged between the two postoperative time points, confirming the stability of the results. The proportion of satisfied patients was 79% after 10 months and 68% (36/53) at last follow-up (NS). Osteoarthritis developed in 13/35 (37%) hips for which radiographs were obtained at last follow-up. At last follow-up, 46/53 hips (87%; 95%CI, 78-96) did not required revision surgery; arthroplasty was required in the 7 remaining hips. The main prognostic factor was the preoperative osteoarthritis Tönnis grade: at last follow-up, compared to Tönnis grade 0 hips, Tönnis grade 1 hips had lower WOMAC scores (77 vs. 88), lower satisfaction rates (50% versus 77%), a higher rate of osteoarthritis progression (57% versus 24%), and a higher rate of arthroplasty (33.3% versus 2.9%). DISCUSSION: Our results are consistent with published data. The outcomes of arthroscopic FAI surgery are sustained over time and the preoperative osteoarthritis status is the main predictor of mid-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prospective cohort study.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Disease Progression , Femoracetabular Impingement/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Hip/complications , Osteoarthritis, Hip/etiology , Adult , Female , Femoracetabular Impingement/complications , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Reoperation
12.
Am J Sports Med ; 42(10): 2393-401, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25134816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive evaluation of hip radiographs in the young adult with hip pain has become increasingly complex and time consuming. The interobserver reliability of manually performed measurements of femoroacetabular impingement, including the alpha angle, has been questioned. Methods to improve the reliability of a radiographic evaluation may increase the clinical utility of these parameters. PURPOSE: To determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of a computer-assisted radiographic analysis of the young adult hip in a clinically relevant setting. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A reliability study of a comprehensive computer-assisted radiographic evaluation was performed, which included 25 radiographic parameters of proximal femoral morphology, acetabular morphology, hip osteoarthritis, and pelvic tilt/rotation. Anteroposterior pelvis and 45° Dunn lateral radiographs of 70 consecutive patients undergoing hip preservation surgery were included. Each radiograph was analyzed by 4 experienced hip surgeons. The reliability of continuous measurements was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), while categorical parameters were analyzed using κ values and percentages of agreement. RESULTS: The interobserver reliability of the parameters of proximal femoral morphology, acetabular morphology, and osteoarthritis was generally substantial to excellent. Parameters with lesser interobserver reliability included the alpha angle (ICC, 0.43), Tönnis osteoarthritis classification (κ = 0.22), and classification of pelvic tilt (using the coccyx or sacrococcygeal joint) (κ = 0.43 and 0.61, respectively). CONCLUSION: A computer-assisted analysis of young adult hip radiographs generally demonstrates substantial to excellent levels of interobserver reliability for most parameters. However, alpha angle measurements demonstrated only moderate interobserver reliability, despite excellent intraobserver reliability. Measurements of the joint space width appear to be significantly more reliable than the use of the Tönnis osteoarthritis classification in this population. The classification of pelvic tilt utilizing the coccyx or sacrococcygeal joint is only moderately reliable.


Subject(s)
Femoracetabular Impingement/diagnostic imaging , Hip Dislocation/diagnostic imaging , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Coccyx/diagnostic imaging , Cohort Studies , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , Pubic Symphysis/diagnostic imaging , Radiography , Reproducibility of Results , Sacrum/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
13.
J Orthop Res ; 32(3): 413-22, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24249665

ABSTRACT

We assessed the variation in proximal femoral canal shape and its association with geometric and demographic parameters in primary hip OA. In a retrospective cohort study, the joint geometry of the proximal femur was evaluated on radiographs and corresponding CT scans of 345 consecutive patients with end-stage hip OA. Active shape modeling (ASM) was performed to assess the variation in endosteal shape of the proximal femur. To identify natural groupings of patients, hierarchical cluster analysis of the shape modes was used. ASM identified 10 independent shape modes accounting for >96% of the variation in proximal femoral canal shape within the dataset. Cluster analysis revealed 10 specific shape clusters. Significant differences in geometric and demographic parameters between the clusters were observed. ASM and subsequent cluster analysis have the potential to identify specific morphological patterns of the proximal femur despite the variability in proximal femoral anatomy. The study identified patterns of proximal femoral canal shape in hip OA that allow a comprehensive classification of variation in shape and its association with joint geometry. Our data may improve future stem designs that will optimize stem fit and simultaneously allow individual restoration of hip biomechanics.


Subject(s)
Femur/pathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/pathology , Adult , Aged , Anatomic Variation , Cluster Analysis , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
14.
Pol Orthop Traumatol ; 78: 167-71, 2013 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23900065

ABSTRACT

A variety of patient-related outcome questionnaires have been used for the assessment of results of total hip replacement. Generic core scales (SF-12, SF-36) and disease-specific scales like: Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Oxford Hip Score, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons hip and knee Questionnaire, Lower Extremity Functional Scale are used most frequently. Even though all of them were assessed in terms of construct and content validity, reproducibility and sensitivity, there are still some problems related to bias when total hip replacement evaluation is performed in the presence of comorbidities, contralateral hip disease and ceiling effect influencing the final score. As a result, there is a need for development of a new PRO questionnaire in order to improve total hip replacement assessment, enable early detection of postoperative complications or to evaluate the results of surgery in both hips separately. It is crucial that such measuring device has to be deprived of the influence of irrelevant factors on the final score.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Activities of Daily Living , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Population Surveillance/methods , Recovery of Function , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome
15.
Arthritis Rheum ; 65(3): 693-700, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23203458

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The atrophic type of hip osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by cartilage degradation without the formation of osteophytes. Individuals with atrophic OA have been less well studied, and it is unknown whether this OA type differs from the osteophytic types with regard to bone tissue. The purpose of this study was to examine bone mineral density (BMD), hip structural properties, and fracture risk in individuals with the atrophic type of OA as compared to those with the osteophytic types (normotrophic/hypertrophic) as well as individuals without OA. METHODS: This study is part of the Rotterdam Study, a large prospective population-based cohort study. We examined 5,006 participants who had been assessed for OA, BMD, and geometric measures at baseline and for incident nonvertebral osteoporotic fractures (mean followup 9.6 years). We estimated the differences in bone characteristics between the OA groups and the controls (no joint space narrowing or osteophytes). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate osteoporotic fracture risk. RESULTS: Participants with atrophic OA had systemically lower BMD as compared to those with normotrophic OA and as compared to the controls (6.5% and 9% for total body BMD; 4% and 5% for skull BMD, respectively). Participants with osteophytic OA had ∼4% and ∼5% higher total body and skull BMD, respectively, a wider femoral neck, and greater bone strength (12% and 5% higher section modulus, respectively) as compared to the controls or to those with atrophic OA. The risk of osteoporotic fractures was almost 50% higher in those with atrophic OA as compared to the controls (hazard risk 1.48, P = 0.008). This difference was not explained by differences in the BMD, number of falls, degree of disability, or use of corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: Individuals with atrophic hip OA have an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures that is not fully explained by systemically lower BMD as compared to controls.


Subject(s)
Bone Density , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Hip/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Absorptiometry, Photon , Aged , Cartilage, Articular/diagnostic imaging , Female , Femur Neck/diagnostic imaging , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Incidence , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteophyte/diagnostic imaging , Osteophyte/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Risk Factors
16.
J Bone Joint Surg Br ; 94(9): 1193-201, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22933490

ABSTRACT

It is probable that both genetic and environmental factors play some part in the aetiology of most cases of degenerative hip disease. Geneticists have identified some single gene disorders of the hip, but have had difficulty in identifying the genetics of many of the common causes of degenerative hip disease. The heterogeneity of the phenotypes studied is part of the problem. A detailed classification of phenotypes is proposed. This study is based on careful documentation of 2003 consecutive total hip replacements performed by a single surgeon between 1972 and 2000. The concept that developmental problems may initiate degenerative hip disease is supported. The influences of gender, age and body mass index are outlined. Biomechanical explanations for some of the radiological appearances encountered are suggested. The body weight lever, which is larger than the abductor lever, causes the abductor power to be more important than body weight. The possibility that a deficiency in joint lubrication is a cause of degenerative hip disease is discussed. Identifying the phenotypes may help geneticists to identify genes responsible for degenerative hip disease, and eventually lead to a definitive classification.


Subject(s)
Cartilage, Articular/diagnostic imaging , Cartilage, Articular/pathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Cartilage, Articular/abnormalities , Causality , Comorbidity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/epidemiology , Phenotype , Radiography , Steroids/adverse effects , Young Adult
17.
Acta Orthop ; 83(2): 185-9, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22329668

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Different methods have been used to classify osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip. We evaluated the reliability of different classifications in order to find which grading system is most appropriate for use in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 49 patients (61 affected hips) with late-detected developmental dislocation of the hip (DDH) were studied. The mean age at follow-up was 45 (32-49) years. 3 classifications of OA were compared. The gradings by Kellgren and Lawrence (1957) (K&L) and Croft et al. (1990) are global visual assessments based on osteophytes, cysts, subchondral sclerosis, and narrowing of the joint space. The third classification is based on narrowing in the upper, weight-bearing part of the joint and defines as OA a minimum joint space width (JSW) of less than 2.0 mm at the narrowest part. 2 experienced observers, one radiologist and one orthopedic surgeon, assessed and measured the radiographs. RESULTS: Minimum JSW (< 2.0 mm in 9 hips) gave the best inter-observer agreement (kappa value = 0.87). Using the K&L grading, inter-observer agreement was moderate (kappa = 0.55), but kappa increased when the number of categories was reduced from 5 to 3 (no OA, mild OA, and severe OA). The Croft classification gave similar agreement as the K&L grading. The intra-observer agreement was better than inter-observer agreement, irrespective of the grading system. There was a good accordance between the minimum JSW and the 2 other methods. INTERPRETATION: Joint space narrowing using a minimum JSW of < 2.0 mm as criterion for OA was the simplest and most reproducible classification in long-term follow-up of patients with DDH. A classification based on global visual assessment can be used in addition if only hips with severe OA are included.


Subject(s)
Hip Dislocation, Congenital/complications , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteoarthritis, Hip/epidemiology , Adult , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/surgery , Hip Joint/pathology , Hip Joint/surgery , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , Prevalence , Radiography , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
18.
Rev. esp. cir. ortop. traumatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 56(1): 17-23, ene.-feb. 2012.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-96530

ABSTRACT

Objetivo. Evaluar los resultados del tratamiento quirúrgico de las fracturas desplazadas de acetábulo. Discernir que variables influyen en el resultado clínico y radiológico final. Material y métodos. Analizamos de forma retrospectiva 23 pacientes intervenidos de fractura acetabular mediante reducción abierta y fijación interna, con una edad media de 40,4 años (17-72 años). El seguimiento medio fue de 4 años (1,5-7,5 años). Según la clasificación de Judet y Letournel intervinimos 10 fracturas simples (43,5%) y 13 complejas (56,5%), siendo la fractura de ambas columnas la más frecuente (8 casos). Valoramos la calidad de la reducción obtenida, los resultados clínicos y la aparición de coxartrosis. Resultados. Obtuvimos una reducción anatómica de la lesión en 12 casos (52%), en 7 (30%) el desplazamiento residual fue menor de 2mm y en 4 pacientes (17%) mayor de 2mm. Según la escala de Harris, el resultado clínico fue excelente o bueno en 18 casos (78%) y aceptable o pobre en 5 (22%), obteniendo peores resultados en fracturas complejas y cuando no alcanzamos una reducción anatómica de la lesión. Seis pacientes (26%) habían desarrollado cambios degenerativos moderados o severos al final del seguimiento. El grado de reducción postquirúrgica obtenida fue identificado como el principal predictor de desarrollo de coxartrosis postraumática. Discusión y conclusiones. La obtención mediante reducción abierta y fijación interna de una correcta congruencia entre la cabeza femoral y el acetábulo es esencial para lograr buenos resultados a largo plazo (AU)


Objective. To evaluate the results of surgical treatment of displaced acetabular fractures, and to discern which variables influence the final radiological and clinical outcome. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 23 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fracture with a mean age of 40.4 years (17-72 years). Mean follow-up was 4 years (1.5-7.5 years). According to Judet and Letournel classification, we operated 10 simple fractures (43.5%) and 13 complex (56.5%), with both-column fractures being the most common type (8 hips). We evaluated the quality of reduction achieved, the clinical results and the occurrence of coxarthrosis. Results. We obtained anatomic reduction of the lesion in 12 cases (52%), in 7 (30%) residual displacement was less than 2mm, and in 4 patients (17%) greater than 2mm. According to Harris’ score, the clinical outcome was excellent or good in 18 cases (78%) and fair or poor in 5 (22%), getting worse in complex fractures and when we do not reach an anatomic reduction of the injury. Six patients (26%) developed moderate or severe degenerative changes during follow-up. The degree of postoperative reduction obtained was identified as the main predictor of the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Discussion and conclusions. The acquisition by open reduction and internal fixation of an accurate congruence between the femoral head and acetabulum is essential to achieve good long-term results (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Evaluation of Results of Therapeutic Interventions/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Acetabulum/injuries , Acetabulum/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Osteoarthritis/complications , Femur Head/injuries , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Acetabulum/physiopathology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Retrospective Studies , Femur Head/surgery , Femur Head
19.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 93(14): 1347-54, 2011 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21792502

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The treatment of middle-aged patients with periacetabular osteotomy remains controversial. The goal of the present retrospective study was to analyze the intermediate to long-term functional and radiographic results of periacetabular osteotomy in patients below and above the age of forty years. METHODS: Between February 1990 and December 2004, 166 periacetabular osteotomies were performed in 146 patients. We evaluated 158 hips in 139 patients who had a mean age of thirty-two years at the time of surgery. The mean duration of follow-up was eleven years (range, five to twenty years). We compared thirty-six patients (forty-one hips) who were forty years of age or older with 103 patients (117 hips) who were younger than forty years of age at the time of surgery. RESULTS: The average Harris hip score increased from 70 points preoperatively to 90 points postoperatively. The mean Harris hip scores at the time of the five-year follow-up were similar in the older and younger groups (p = 0.57), although the latest follow-up scores were significantly higher in the younger group than in the older group (91 compared with 88 points; p = 0.02). The average modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function score (with 0 representing the worst score and 100 representing the best score) was higher for the younger group than for the older group (92 compared with 90 points; p = 0.03). Kaplan-Meier analysis with progression of the Tönnis grade of osteoarthritis as the end point showed a ten-year survival rate of 90.8% (95% confidence interval, 88.3% to 93.3%) and a fifteen-year survival rate of 83.0% (95% confidence interval, 78.5% to 87.5%); the ten-year survival rates in the younger and older groups were 94.4% and 81.3%, respectively, and the fifteen-year survival rates were 86.9% and 71.2%, respectively (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Periacetabular osteotomy yielded similar results for the two groups at the time of the five-year follow-up, although the results for the older group deteriorated thereafter. Decrease in physical function due to aging and increased susceptibility to the progression of osteoarthritis may be responsible for the poorer results over time in the older group.


Subject(s)
Acetabulum/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Osteotomy/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Disease Progression , Female , Hip/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology , Radiography , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
20.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 19(8): 946-62, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21550411

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop a semiquantitative MRI-based scoring system (HOAMS) of hip osteoarthritis (OA) and test its reliability and validity. DESIGN: Fifty-two patients with chronic hip pain were included. 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on all patients. Pelvic radiographs were scored according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) system. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the hip osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS). MRIs were analyzed using a novel whole-joint MRI score that incorporated 13 articular features. Reliability was determined on a random subset of 15 cases. Weighted-kappa statistics and overall agreement were used as a measure of intra- and inter-observer reliability. Associations between MRI features and radiographic OA severity were calculated using Cochran-Armitage test for trend. Ordinal logistic regression was used to assess associations between MRI features and severity of pain and functional limitation. RESULTS: Distribution of radiographic grading was: KL 0=12 (27%), KL 1=11 (25%), KL 2=14 (32%), KL 3=5 (11%) and KL 4=2 (5%). Intra-reader reliability for the different features ranged from 0.18 (cysts) to 0.85 (cartilage). Inter-reader reliability ranged between 0.15 (cysts) and 0.85 (BMLs). Low kappas were due to low frequencies of some features as overall percent agreement was good to excellent (83.8% and 83.1%). There was a strong association between MRI-detected lesions and radiographic severity (P=0.002). Non-significant trends were observed between MRI features and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: MRI-based semiquantitative assessment of the hip shows adequate reliability. Presence of more severe MRI-detected intraarticular pathology shows a strong association with radiographic OA. The results suggest possible associations between MRI-detected pathology and clinical symptoms.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis , Aged , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Osteoarthritis, Hip/classification , Osteoarthritis, Hip/pathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...