National Trends in Daily Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Use by Otolaryngologists.

OBJECTIVE: Since their development in the 1970s electronic health records (EHRs) are now nearly ubiquitous. This study aims to characterize the daily interactions of otolaryngology providers with EHRs. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional review of provider efficiency profile (PEP) data, as collected by a major EHR vendor. Participating institutions had 6 months of de-identified PEP data reviewed starting January 1, 2019. PEP data is generated for providers with scheduled patients, both attendings and advanced practice providers (APPs). Time metrics are recorded when a provider is interacting with the EHR including a 5-second time-out for inactivity. RESULTS: Data on 269 otolaryngologists and 29 APPs from 10 institutions were evaluated. On scheduled ambulatory clinic days attendings spent 70 ± 36 (mean ± standard deviation) min interacting in the EHR versus 108 ± 46 min for APPs. Of the daily EHR time, mean time in notes, clinical review, in basket, orders, and schedule were 30.1 ± 19.4, 9.6 ± 6.1, 7.3 ± 5.8, and 5.8 ± 7.6 min, respectively. Per patient visit, median (interquartile range) time in notes, clinical review, and orders were 3.19 (2.2-4.9), 1.14 (0.63-1.8), and 0.70 (0.47-1.05) min, respectively. Mean progress note length was 4638 ± 2143 characters. CONCLUSION: Otolaryngology providers spend a meaningful portion of their clinic day interacting with the EHR. PEP data may provide means to target interventions and a metric to measure the impact of those interventions on provider EHR efficiency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:975-981, 2021.

Impact of COVID-19 on otolaryngology in Italy: a commentary from the COVID-19 task force of the Young Otolaryngologists of the Italian Society of Otolaryngology.

OBJECTIVE: The ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 is having a dramatic effect on most medical disciplines. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery is one of the most engaged disciplines, and otolaryngology specialists are facing a radical change of their role and daily activities that will have severe impact on the return to the ordinary. In this paper, the COVID-19 Task Force of the Young Otolaryngologists of the Italian Society of Otolaryngology comment on the changes that occurred for otolaryngology in Italy during the pandemic. Changes include organizational rearrangement of Otolaryngology Units, with merges and closures that affected a significant portion of them; reallocation of otolaryngology personnel, mainly to COVID-19 wards; reduction of elective clinical and surgical activity, that was mainly limited to oncology and emergency procedures; and execution of screening procedures for SARS-CoV-2 among healthcare providers and patients in otolaryngology units in Italy.

Otolaryngologist as a Political Leader?

Otolaryngologists are in a good position to advocate for our patients and our specialty. We can do it as a volunteer or as a full-time job running for political office at the state or federal level. To be taken seriously, we need to offer solutions besides citing the problems. We encourage otolaryngologists to work with our Academy and its ENT-PAC (Ear, Nose, Throat Political Action Committee). Medicine is a great profession and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery is an even better specialty.

COVID-19 Pandemic: What Every Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeon Needs to Know for Safe Airway Management.

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has unfolded with remarkable speed, posing unprecedented challenges for health care systems and society. Otolaryngologists have a special role in responding to this crisis by virtue of expertise in airway management. Against the backdrop of nations struggling to contain the virus's spread and to manage hospital strain, otolaryngologists must partner with anesthesiologists and front-line health care teams to provide expert services in high-risk situations while reducing transmission. Airway management and airway endoscopy, whether awake or sedated, expose operators to infectious aerosols, posing risks to staff. This commentary provides background on the outbreak, highlights critical considerations around mitigating infectious aerosol contact, and outlines best practices for airway-related clinical decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic. What otolaryngologists need to know and what actions are required are considered alongside the implications of increasing demand for tracheostomy. Approaches to managing the airway are presented, emphasizing safety of patients and the health care team.

Patient values regarding overlapping surgery: Identification of distinct patient subgroups.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To explore patient values associated with their comfort level with surgical trainees and attending surgeon absence from the operating room. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with general medical patients. METHODS: We analyzed data from qualitative interviews with patients that included a quantitative rating on a visual analog scale (VAS) of comfort consenting to three surgical scenarios, including overlapping surgery, to identify subgroups of patients based on comfort level. After identifying subgroups, we compared qualitative responses from participants who were generally comfortable with overlapping surgery to those who were uncomfortable to identify themes associated with these perceptions. RESULTS: We identified three subgroups of patients based on the patterns of VAS responses. Participants who were comfortable with overlapping surgery expressed trust in the surgeon and delegation process. Those who were most uncomfortable expressed a strong desire to know who was operating on them, and a desire for control over their surgical process. Subjects uncomfortable with overlapping surgery were also generally not sensitive to tradeoffs (cost, timing). CONCLUSIONS: We identified distinct subgroups of patients based on their comfort level with trainee independence and primary attending availability. By examining the predominant values in these subgroups, we identified potential explanations for patient discomfort with attending absence. Strategies to enhance patients' knowledge about the process of surgery and a sense of control over their own care may improve comfort with trainee participation and overlapping surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 6 Laryngoscope, 2019.