Georg von Békésy and Bruce Mer: Early Pioneers of Endoscopic Ear Surgery.

The binocular operative microscope has been the workhorse of otologic and neurotologic surgeons since the 1950s. Since its advent, however, surgeons recognized that the operative microscope could not "look around corners" and its line-of-sight technology required soft tissue and bony dissection to enable light to reach the surgical plane. Endoscopic technology has evolved to address many of the limitations of operative microscopy. While the endoscope is often viewed as a recent development in otologic surgery, in the following historical article, we highlight the contributions of two mid-20th century pioneers of endoscopic ear surgery: Georg von Békésy and Bruce Mer. In the 1940s, Dr von Békésy envisioned an endoscope for determining stapes mobility. Dr Mer, with a team of engineers, created an otoendoscope to perform some of the first endoscopic ear procedures in the 1960s. Lessons gleaned from von Békésy and Mer's research include the need for counterculture thinking and the challenges of pioneering ideas beyond technical capacity.

El oftalmoscopio sin espejo de Welch-Allyn / The mirrorless ophthalmoscope de Welch-Allyn

No disponible

Curtis's cephaloscope: deafness and the making of surgical authority in London, 1816-1845.

Aural surgery is a branch of nineteenth-century medicine and surgery providing specialized treatment for ear diseases. During the 1830s, faced with a "popular prejudice" against the curability of deafness as well as intraprofessional rivalries and continuous accusations of quackery, aurists found their surgical authority questioned and their field's value threatened. In an attempt to bolster aural surgery's reputation, in 1841, the aurist John Harrison Curtis (1778-1856) introduced his new diagnostic instrument, the cephaloscope, which could not only improve diagnosis but also provide approaches for regulating aural knowledge, thus strengthening aural surgery's authority. This article examines the motives underlying Curtis's introduction of the cephaloscope and the meanings it held for the occupational group at large.

References in the history of otology: the importance of being earnest.

BACKGROUND: Historical vignettes are often included in scientific otological articles. However, they may contain inaccuracies and errors when authors use secondary or compiled texts rather than primary source material. METHODS: Examples of errors arising from the use of secondary sources are obtained from compiled works in comparison with original publications, with a particular focus on Hildanus' speculum. RESULTS: Different types of inaccuracies may be found in historical vignettes. In Hildanus' works, two different specula are depicted: one was described by himself during his lifetime, and the other after his death, probably by his publisher. Only the posthumous description of Hildanus' speculum has been retained historically, but it is uncertain that it was really developed by Hildanus himself. Other such inaccuracies exist because of confusion with the original terminology of referring to an instrument, such as the otoscopes of Toynbee and Brunton, inaccuracies in dates, misinterpretation of the original text, such as the attribution to Charcot as the first to propose the intracranial division of the eighth nerve in Menière's disease, and problems of translation (e.g., the different translations of the book titled Diseases of the Ear by Wilhelm Kramer). CONCLUSION: These different examples of inaccuracies show the common problems encountered in writing a historical report. Authors must be aware of such errors and work almost exclusively with original references. Secondary and compiled references should be reserved for a background of discussion and not as a source of direct support.

Historic perspective of the acoustic otoscope.

The acoustic otoscope, originally called the acoustic reflectometer, was developed and produced by John and David Teele in the early 1980s. Since initial production, two different instrument versions have been developed by two separate companies. During the period of time in which the acoustic otoscope has been in production, there have been numerous studies reported with the two instrument versions. We provide a historic summary of the acoustic otoscope, summarize the pertinent studies, and address the contrasting results found in the literature.