Comparative analysis of linezolid, vancomycin, and hyperbaric oxygen therapies in a rat model of ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection.

PURPOSE: Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common causative microorganism of ventriculoperitoneal shunt infections. This study aimed to compare linezolid and vancomycin treatments and to examine the effect of these antibiotics alone and combined with hyperbaric oxygen therapy on the amount of bacterial colonies in the experimental S. epidermidis shunt infection model. METHODS: A shunt catheter was placed in the cisterna magna of 49 adult male Wistar albino rats. The rats were randomly divided into seven groups, as follows: sterile control, infected control, vancomycin, linezolid, hyperbaric oxygen, vancomycin + hyperbaric oxygen, linezolid + hyperbaric oxygen. In all groups except the sterile control group, 0.2 ml 107 CFU/mL S. epidermidis was inoculated to the cisterna magna. Parenteral vancomycin was administered 40 mg/kg/day to the vancomycin groups, and 50 mg/kg/day of enteral linezolid to the linezolid groups. Hyperbaric oxygen groups were given 100% oxygen at a pressure of 2.4 ATA for 50 min a day. One day after the last treatment, colony quantities in the shunt catheters and CSF were analyzed. RESULTS: The number of CSF colonies in the linezolid group was significantly lower than in the vancomycin group (p < 0.05). The number of CSF colonies in the linezolid + HBO group was significantly lower than in the vancomycin + HBO group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid treatment was found to be more effective than vancomycin in ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection caused by S. epidermidis. There was no statistical difference among other treatment groups. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is shown to contribute to the sterilization of cultures.

Bactericidal and sterilizing activity of novel regimens combining bedaquiline or TBAJ-587 with GSK2556286 and TBA-7371 in a mouse model of tuberculosis.

The combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL) has become a preferred regimen for treating multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). However, treatment-limiting toxicities of linezolid and reports of emerging bedaquiline and pretomanid resistance necessitate efforts to develop new short-course oral regimens. We recently found that the addition of GSK2556286 increases the bactericidal and sterilizing activity of BPa-containing regimens in a well-established BALB/c mouse model of tuberculosis. Here, we used this model to evaluate the potential of new regimens combining bedaquiline or the more potent diarylquinoline TBAJ-587 with GSK2556286 and the DprE1 inhibitor TBA-7371, all of which are currently in early-phase clinical trials. We found the combination of bedaquiline, GSK2556286, and TBA-7371 to be more active than the first-line regimen and nearly as effective as BPaL in terms of bactericidal and sterilizing activity. In addition, we found that GSK2556286 and TBA-7371 were as effective as pretomanid and the novel oxazolidinone TBI-223 when either drug pair was combined with TBAJ-587 and that the addition of GSK2556286 increased the bactericidal activity of the TBAJ-587, pretomanid, and TBI-223 combination. We conclude that GSK2556286 and TBA-7371 have the potential to replace pretomanid, an oxazolidinone, or both components, in combination with bedaquiline or TBAJ-587.

Contezolid can replace linezolid in a novel combination with bedaquiline and pretomanid in a murine model of tuberculosis.

Contezolid is a new oxazolidinone with in vitro and in vivo activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis comparable to that of linezolid. Pre-clinical and clinical safety studies suggest it may be less toxic than linezolid, making contezolid a potential candidate to replace linezolid in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. We evaluated the dose-ranging activity of contezolid, alone and in combination with bedaquiline and pretomanid, and compared it with linezolid at similar doses, in an established BALB/c mouse model of tuberculosis. Contezolid had an MIC of 1 µg/mL, similar to linezolid, and exhibited similar bactericidal activity in mice. Contezolid-resistant mutants selected in vitro had 32- to 64-fold increases in contezolid MIC and harbored mutations in the mce3R gene. These mutants did not display cross-resistance to linezolid. Our results indicate that contezolid has the potential to replace linezolid in regimens containing bedaquiline and pretomanid and likely other regimens.

Intracellular and in vivo activities of oxazolidinone drugs against Mycobacterium avium complex infection.

The prevalence of Mycobacterium avium complex-pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) has become a growing concern worldwide, and current treatments involving macrolides (clarithromycin [CLR] or azithromycin), ethambutol, and rifampicin have limited success, highlighting the need for better therapeutic strategies. Recently, oxazolidinone drugs have been identified as novel anti-tuberculosis drugs effective against drug-resistant M. tuberculosis. However, the effects of these drugs against MAC are still controversial due to limited data. Here, we first evaluated the intracellular anti-MAC activities of two oxazolidinone drugs, linezolid (LZD) and delpazolid (DZD), against 10 macrolide-susceptible MAC strains and one macrolide-resistant M. avium strain in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) and found that both drugs demonstrated similar potential. The synergistic efficacies with CLR were then determined in a chronic progressive MAC-PD murine model by initiating a 4-week treatment at 8 weeks post-infection. Upon assessment of bacterial burdens and inflamed lesions, oxazolidinone drugs exhibited no anti-MAC effect, and there was no significant difference in the synergistic effect of CLR between LZD and DZD. These findings suggest that oxazolidinone drugs inhibit intracellular bacterial growth, even against macrolide-resistant MAC, but their clinical application requires further consideration.

Prolonged use of linezolid in bone and joint infections: a retrospective analysis of adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic treatment for bone and joint infections generally lasts for 6 weeks or longer. Linezolid may be a good option for treating bone and joint infections, but there is an increased risk of potential serious adverse drug events (ADEs) when used for more than 28 days. The aim of this study was to obtain detailed information on the type and time to occurrence of the patient-reported ADEs, the dynamics of haematopoiesis over time, and the reasons for early discontinuation of linezolid when used for an intended maximum duration of 12 weeks. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study was conducted at the Sint Maartenskliniek in The Netherlands. Patients were included if they were planned to use linezolid for more than 28 days. The main reason for discontinuation of linezolid, the ADE according to the Naranjo score, and the time to occurrence of ADEs were analysed. RESULTS: Among 78 patients, drug toxicity led to early discontinuation of linezolid in 11 (14%) patients before and nine (12%) after 28 days of therapy. The median treatment duration was 42 days. Gastrointestinal intolerance (42%) and malaise (32%) were the most common ADEs. In 75% of the cases the ADE occurred within 28 days of therapy. Sixty-seven patients were able to continue linezolid beyond 28 days, 87% of whom completed therapy as scheduled. Severe cytopenia, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse events (CTCA), was observed in four patients and was reversible after discontinuation of linezolid. One patient suffered optic neuropathy related to linezolid use. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid could be considered an alternative option to the current standard of IV glycopeptides for the treatment of bone and joint infection for up to 12 weeks. If patients pass the first 28 days of therapy, the likelihood of successful completion of therapy is high with a low risk of serious ADEs.

Hybridization of antimicrobial oxazolidinones with commercial drugs: A fight against the "superbugs".

Antimicrobial resistance caused by the emergence of antibiotic-resistant microbes, termed as "superbugs," poses a grave healthcare concern in the contemporary era. Though this phenomenon is natural, an incessant use of antibiotics due to their unregulated over-the-counter availability, and a lack of compliance with the legislation seem to be major contributing factors. This phenomenon has further complicated the treatment of common infectious diseases thereby leading to prolonged illness, disability, and even death. In addition, a sizeable impact on the healthcare cost is met due to a prolonged stay at the medical facilities to receive an intensive care. Overall, the gains of "Millennium Development Goals" and the accomplishment of Sustainable Development Goals are at risk due to the emerging antimicrobial resistance. Since an early identification and development of novel antibiotic classes that evade antimicrobial resistance appears improbable, the strategy of hybridization of the existing antibiotics with efficacious pharmacophores and drug molecules with a different mechanism of antimicrobial action can be a silver lining for the management of superbugs. In this regard, we aim to provide a perspective for the applicability of the hybridization of oxazolidinone class of antibiotics with other drugs for evading antimicrobial resistance.

Clinical efficacy of psychiatric nursing-based vancomycin in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infectious skin diseases.

To study the clinical effect of psychiatric nursing-based vancomycin in patients with staphylococcus aureus infectious skin disease. A retrospective analysis was performed on 100 patients with staphylococcus aureus infectious skin disease admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to July 2020. Al patients received psychiatric nursing and were divided into control group (mupiroxine) and experimental group (vancomycin) according to the treatment mode, with 50 patients in each group. The effective rate of treatment, adverse reactions, disappearance time of dermatological clinical symptoms and recurrence after one course of treatment were compared between the two groups. The effective rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions and the disappearance time of clinical symptoms in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). After one course of treatment, the number of patients with recurrence in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Vancomycin might be a boon for patients with staphylococcus aureus infectious skin diseases, with good effectiveness and safety profiles.

The anti-inflammatory effect of tedizolid on carrageenan-induced footpad edema rat model.

Tedizolid (TZD) is an oxazolidinone anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) drug. Linezolid (LZD), another oxazolidinone, has been shown to have an anti-inflammatory effect. TZD has been shown to exhibit an anti-inflammatory effect in a murine model of hematogenous pulmonary infection. In this study, we further investigated the anti-inflammatory effect of TZDs using a carrageenan-induced rat footpad edema model. TZD was administered at 0, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg to the carrageenan-induced rat footpad edema model, and the edema rate was measured over time up to 9 h later. The area under the time curve of the edema rate profile (AUCedema0→9) decreased in a TZD dose-dependent manner. In addition, the correlation between AUCedema0→9 and the area under the time curve of free TZD plasma concentration (fAUCblood) obtained from the pharmacokinetic study of TZD in the carrageenan-induced rat footpad edema model was examined. fAUCblood and AUCedema0→9 showed a good negative correlation. These results indicate that TZD suppresses carrageenan-induced footpad edema and that TZD exerts its anti-inflammatory effects in a plasma concentration-dependent manner.

Side-by-Side Profiling of Oxazolidinones to Estimate the Therapeutic Window against Mycobacterial Infections.

New oxazolidinones are in clinical development for the treatment of tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections, as a replacement for linezolid and tedizolid, which cause mitochondrial toxicity after prolonged treatment. Here, we carried out side-by-side measurements of mitochondrial protein synthesis inhibition and activity against clinically relevant mycobacterial pathogens of approved and novel oxazolidinones. We found a large range of selectivity indices suggesting TBI-223 and sutezolid as promising candidates against tuberculosis and NTM lung disease caused by Mycobacterium kansasii.

Next-Generation Diarylquinolines Improve Sterilizing Activity of Regimens with Pretomanid and the Novel Oxazolidinone TBI-223 in a Mouse Tuberculosis Model.

A regimen comprised of bedaquiline (BDQ, or B), pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL) is the first oral 6-month regimen approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and recommended by the World Health Organization for the treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. We used a well-established BALB/c mouse model of tuberculosis to evaluate the treatment-shortening potential of replacing bedaquiline with either of two new, more potent diarylquinolines, TBAJ-587 and TBAJ-876, in early clinical trials. We also evaluated the effect of replacing linezolid with a new oxazolidinone, TBI-223, exhibiting a larger safety margin with respect to mitochondrial toxicity in preclinical studies. Replacing bedaquiline with TBAJ-587 at the same 25-mg/kg dose significantly reduced the proportion of mice relapsing after 2 months of treatment, while replacing linezolid with TBI-223 at the same 100-mg/kg dose did not significantly change the proportion of mice relapsing. Replacing linezolid or TBI-223 with sutezolid in combination with TBAJ-587 and pretomanid significantly reduced the proportion of mice relapsing. In combination with pretomanid and TBI-223, TBAJ-876 at 6.25 mg/kg was equipotent to TBAJ-587 at 25 mg/kg. We conclude that replacement of bedaquiline with these more efficacious and potentially safer diarylquinolines and replacement of linezolid with potentially safer and at least as efficacious oxazolidinones in the clinically successful BPaL regimen may lead to superior regimens capable of treating both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB more effectively and safely.

Efficacy of Replacing Linezolid with OTB-658 in Anti-Tuberculosis Regimens in Murine Models.

Linezolid (LZD) was the first oxazolidinone approved for treating drug-resistant tuberculosis. A newly approved regimen combining LZD with bedaquiline (BDQ) and pretomanid (PMD) (BPaL regimen) is the first 6-month oral regimen that is effective against multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. However, LZD toxicity, primarily due to mitochondrial protein synthesis inhibition, may undermine the efficacy of LZD regimens, and oxazolidinones with higher efficacy and lower toxicity during prolonged administration are needed. OTB-658 is an oxazolidinone anti-TB candidate derived from LZD that could replace LZD in TB treatment. We previously found that OTB-658 had better anti-TB activity and safety than LZD in vitro and in vivo. In the present work, two murine TB models were used to evaluate replacing LZD with OTB-658 in LZD-containing regimens. In the C3HeB/FeJ murine model, replacing 100 mg/kg LZD with 50 mg/kg OTB-658 in the BDQ + PMD backbone significantly reduced lung and spleen CFU counts (P < 0.05), and there were few relapses at 8 weeks of treatment. Replacing 100 mg/kg LZD with 50 or 100 mg/kg OTB-658 in the pyrifazimine (previously called TBI-166) + BDQ backbone did not change the anti-TB efficacy and relapse rate. In BALB/c mice, replacing 100 mg/kg LZD with 100 mg/kg OTB-658 in the TBI-166 + BDQ backbone resulted in no culture-positive lungs at 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, and there were no significant differences in relapses rate between the groups. In conclusion, OTB-658 is a promising clinical candidate that could replace LZD in the BPaL or TBI-166 + BDQ + LZD regimens and should be studied further in clinical trials.

Detection of linezolid resistance cfr gene among MRSA isolates.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid (Oxazolidinones) is commonly used against a variety of Gram-positive infections, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The emerging resistance to linezolid curtail the treatment of infections caused by MRSA and other Gram-positive bacteria. Presence of cfr gene plays a crucial role in Linezolid resistance. OBJECTIVE: Present study was aimed to detect cfr gene among clinical MRSA isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The suspected Staphylococcus aureus isolates were processed through Kirby Bauer disc diffusion methods for the confirmation of MRSA strains. Phenotypic Linezolid resistance was determined through broth micro-dilution method. The plasmid and DNA of Linezolid resistant isolates were subjected to molecular characterization for the presence of cfr gene. RESULTS: Among 100 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, 85 of them were confirmed as MRSA isolates. Categorically, 65% MRSA isolates were sensitive to linezolid with MIC lower than 8 µg/ml, whereas, 35% of them were resistant to linezolid having MIC greater than 8 µg/ml. MIC level of 128 µg/ml was observed among 3.5% of the resistant isolates. Similarly, MIC level of 64 µg/ml, 32 µg/ml, 16 µg/ml and 8 µg/ml were noted for 3.5%, 4.7%, 8.2% and 15.3% isolates respectively. Linezolid resistance cfr gene was detected only in 9.4% of the resistant isolates. CONCLUSION: Multi drug resistance among MRSA isolates is keenly attributed to the presence of cfr gene as evident in the present study, and horizontal dissemination of cfr gene among MRSA strains is accredited to cfr-carrying transposons and plasmids.

Recent advances in oxazolidinones as antituberculosis agents.

Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious and fatal disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and remains a serious public health threat; therefore, the development of new antitubercular agents is a priority for the World Health Organization's End TB strategy and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals to eradicate TB. Oxazolidinones are a class of synthetic antibacterial agents with a distinct mode of action developed for the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections. Many oxazolidinones exhibit good activity against Mtb, and some are currently in clinical trials for multidrug-resistant TB and extensively drug-resistant TB therapy. In this review, the mechanism of action, activity and toxicity of oxazolidinones and recent progress in the research and development of oxazolidinones as anti-TB agents are summarized.

Contezolid in complicated skin and soft tissue infection.

Contezolid (MRX-I, Youxitai) is an oral oxazolidinone drug being developed by MicuRx Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. It was approved by China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) in June 2021, attaining its first approval for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs). It is also under clinical development for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) in the U.S. after receiving qualified infectious disease product (QIDP) classification and fast track status by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in September 2018. Contezolid is effective against a broad range of Gram-positive bacteria including activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE). It provides a major benefit over the most popular drug of its class, linezolid (Zyvox), by offering an improved safety profile and minimal effects concerning myelosuppression and monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibition, two independent adverse events limiting linezolid use in the clinic. The recommended dosage regimen of contezolid is 800 mg every 12 hours for 7-14 days with regular food intake and it can be extended if required. At the mentioned dose under fed conditions, satisfactory efficacy against MRSA with a 90%; or higher cumulative fraction of response and probability of target attainment was achieved. Additionally, contezolid also exhibits activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium abscessus.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Enterococci.

Enterococci are major, recalcitrant nosocomial pathogens with a wide repertoire of intrinsic and acquired resistance determinants and the potential of developing resistance to all clinically available antimicrobials. As such, multidrug-resistant enterococci are considered a serious public health threat. Due to limited treatment options and rapid emergence of resistance to all novel agents, the clinical microbiology laboratory plays a critical role in deploying accurate, reproducible, and feasible antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to guide appropriate treatment of patients with deep-seated enterococcal infections. In this review, we provide an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of existing manual and automated methods that test susceptibility of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis to ß-lactams, aminoglycosides, vancomycin, lipoglycopeptides, oxazolidinones, novel tetracycline-derivatives, and daptomycin. We also identify unique problems and gaps with the performance and clinical utility of antimicrobial susceptibility testing for enterococci, provide recommendations for clinical laboratories to circumvent select problems, and address potential future innovations that can bridge major gaps in susceptibility testing.

WCK 4034: A promising oxazolidinone for treating gram positive infections.

Increased resistance to gram positive infections have highlighted the limitations of currently available drug treatments including penicillins, macrolides and glycopeptides. As an alternative to address these challenges; Linezolid, the first antibiotic from oxazolidinone class, have shown the promising activities against such infections, although associated toxicological issues limiting the use of linezolid for prolonged treatments. In order to circumvent disadvantages allied with the marketed drugs, we herein reporting the synthesis of WCK 4034, an oxazolidinone antibiotic through our structure activity relationship (SAR) program. Through this exercise, WCK 4034, has shown competitive MIC values against Methicillin Sensitive S. aureus (MSSA, Sta-001), Methicillin Resistant S. aureus (MRSA, Sta-032), S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 and H. influenza ATCC 35054 species as like linezolid. Although with an additional advantage; WCK 4034 has been found superior during dog PK studies as compare to Linezolid. With the preliminary studies in our hand, we herein assuming these improved pharmacokinetic values would be helpful. Moreover, WCK 4034 has successfully completed pre-clinical studies and ready to enter the clinical space, and paved the way for in house development of other oxazolidinone NCEs.

Impact of Empiric Linezolid for Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections on Duration of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus-Active Therapy.

Background: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) require prompt surgical debridement and antimicrobial therapy. Indicated antimicrobial therapy involves broad-spectrum coverage against common pathogens and toxin inhibition. Linezolid provides both methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage and toxin inhibition, however, there is limited evidence evaluating its role in empiric treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of empiric linezolid use for NSTIs on the total duration of MRSA-active therapy. Patients and Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included adult surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients treated with empiric vancomycin and clindamycin or linezolid along with gram-negative and anaerobe coverage for NSTIs. The primary end point of this study was the duration of MRSA-active therapy. Secondary end points included ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS; days), new-onset acute kidney injury (AKI), and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Results: There were 21 patients in the vancomycin/clindamycin cohort and 28 patients in the linezolid cohort. The average duration of vancomycin was 3.9 days versus 2.9 days of linezolid (p = 0.04). The average hospital LOS for the vancomycin/clindamycin cohort was somewhat longer than the linezolid cohort, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07), and the incidence of new-onset AKI during hospitalization was higher in the vancomycin/clindamycin cohort (38.1% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). No differences were observed for ICU LOS or CDI. Conclusions: Empiric linezolid use for NSTI was associated with one less day of MRSA-active therapy and lower incidence of new-onset AKI during hospitalization. Linezolid was a safe and effective alternative to vancomycin/clindamycin for empiric treatment of NSTIs.

Early Bactericidal Activity of Delpazolid (LCB01-0371) in Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

Delpazolid, an oxazolidinone, has been studied in non-clinical studies of efficacy and toxicity and Phase 1 clinical studies. Delpazolid has in vitro activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis. This study evaluated the bactericidal activity, safety, and pharmacokinetics of delpazolid in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Seventy-nine subjects, aged 19 to 75 years with newly diagnosed smear-positive TB with no prior treatment for the current episode and no confirmed resistance to rifampin or isoniazid, were randomized to receive delpazolid 800 mg once a day (QD), 400 mg twice a day (BID), 800 mg BID or 1,200 mg QD or an active control of isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol (HRZE) or linezolid 600 mg BID. The primary endpoint was the average daily reduction in log transformed bacterial load, assessed on 7H11 solid-media culture, from days 0 to 14. The average daily decline in log-CFU was 0.044 ± 0.016, 0.053 ± 0.017, 0.043 ± 0.016, and 0.019 ± 0.017, for the delpazolid 800 mg QD, 400 mg BID, 800 mg BID, and the 1,200 mg QD groups, respectively. The average daily decline in log-CFU was 0.192 ± 0.028 for the HRZE group and 0.154 ± 0.023 for the linezolid 600 mg BID group. Three serious adverse events (SAE) were reported, one each in the delpazolid 400 mg BID group (death due to worsening of TB at day 2), the HRZE group (hospitalization due to pleural effusion) and the linezolid group (hyperkalemia); none of the SAEs were assessed as related to study drugs. This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with registration number NCT02836483.