Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bioconjug Chem ; 31(1): 93-103, 2020 01 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31747250

ABSTRACT

Antibody-drug conjugates have elicited great interest recently as targeted chemotherapies for cancer. Recent preclinical and clinical data have continued to raise questions about optimizing the design of these complex therapeutics. Biochemical methods for site-specific antibody conjugation have been a design feature of recent clinical ADCs, and preclinical reports suggest that site-specifically conjugated ADCs generically offer improved therapeutic indices (i.e., the fold difference between efficacious and maximum tolerated doses). Here we present the results of a systematic preclinical comparison of ADCs embodying the DNA-alkylating linker-payload DGN549 generated with both heterogeneous lysine-directed and site-specific cysteine-directed conjugation chemistries. Importantly, the catabolites generated by each ADC are the same regardless of the conjugation format. In two different model systems evaluated, the site-specific ADC showed a therapeutic index benefit. However, the therapeutic index benefit is different in each case: both show evidence of improved tolerability, though with different magnitudes, and in one case significant efficacy improvement is also observed. These results support our contention that conjugation chemistry of ADCs is best evaluated in the context of a particular antibody, target, and linker-payload, and ideally across multiple disease models.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Immunoconjugates/therapeutic use , Lysine/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Oxindoles/therapeutic use , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacokinetics , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines/chemistry , Benzodiazepines/pharmacokinetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Female , Humans , Immunoconjugates/adverse effects , Immunoconjugates/chemistry , Immunoconjugates/pharmacokinetics , Lysine/adverse effects , Lysine/chemistry , Lysine/pharmacokinetics , Mice , Mice, SCID , Oxindoles/adverse effects , Oxindoles/chemistry , Oxindoles/pharmacokinetics , Therapeutic Index
2.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 82(2): 211-219, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29802443

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A sequential approach, synchronizing cell-cycle specific chemotherapy during VEGFR-TKI treatment breaks, may improve the therapeutic index of this combination therapy. In this study we investigate the safety/tolerability and pharmacodynamic effects of docetaxel used in sequential combination with the novel VEGFR-TKI X-82. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies underwent 21-day treatment cycles with X-82 administered daily on days 1-14, a treatment break on days 15-20, and docetaxel administered on day 21. Randomization was 1:1 to either a low-dose X-82 (200 mg) or high-dose X-82 (400 mg) arm. Patients were scheduled to undergo four 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT scans to assess changes in tumor cell proliferation. PET standardized uptake values (SUV) were summarized for tumors and changes were assessed using mixed effects models. RESULTS: 14 patients were enrolled and treated with median 3.5 cycles (range 0-12). Three patients in the high-dose cohort (50%) and three patients in the low-dose cohort (38%) experienced at least one grade 3 adverse event during the study (infections, cytopenias, electrolyte abnormalities, and vascular complications). Four patients with 13 metastatic tumors underwent FLT PET/CT scanning. During the cycle 1 X-82 exposure period, tumor SUVmax decreased by - 11% (p = 0.04). After administration of docetaxel and the cycle 2 X-82 exposure period, tumor SUVmax decreased - 44% (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The sequential combination of X-82 and docetaxel was safe and led to diminished FLT uptake. Further, decrease in FLT uptake during cycle 2 (X-82 plus docetaxel) was greater than in cycle 1 (X-82 alone), suggesting sequential chemotherapy enhances the pharmacodynamic effect of therapy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Dideoxynucleosides , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Docetaxel/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/blood , Oxindoles/administration & dosage , Oxindoles/adverse effects , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Radiopharmaceuticals , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...