Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 358
Filter
1.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis ; 66: 61-69, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34332661

ABSTRACT

Leadless pacemakers (LPs) have revolutionized the field of pacing by miniaturizing pacemakers and rendering them completelty intracardiac, hence reducing complications related to pacemaker pockets and transvenous leads. However, first generation LPs appear to be associated with a higher rate of myocardial perforation as compared to transvenous pacemakers (TV-PPM). Currently, LPs are predominantly designed to pace the right ventricle with no LPs that provide atrial or biventricular pacing. In this article, we review the available data on LPs while advocating for the need for a randomized controlled trial comparing LPs to TV-PPMs. In addition, we review the future directions of leadless devices.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/trends , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Action Potentials , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/adverse effects , Diffusion of Innovation , Equipment Design , Forecasting , Heart Conduction System/physiopathology , Heart Rate , Humans , Miniaturization , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, Right
3.
Europace ; 23(3): 456-463, 2021 03 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33595062

ABSTRACT

AIMS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, concern regarding its effect on the management of non-communicable diseases has been raised. However, there are no data on the impact on cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implantation rates. We aimed to determine the impact of SARS-CoV2 on the monthly incidence rates and type of pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantations in Catalonia before and after the declaration of the state of alarm in Spain on 14 March 2020. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on new CIED implantations for 2017-20 were prospectively collected by nine hospitals in Catalonia. A mixed model with random intercepts corrected for time was used to estimate the change in monthly CIED implantations. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, an absolute decrease of 56.5% was observed (54.7% in PM and 63.7% in ICD) in CIED implantation rates. Total CIED implantations for 2017-19 and January and February 2020 was 250/month (>195 PM and >55 ICD), decreasing to 207 (161 PM and 46 ICD) in March and 131 (108 PM and 23 ICD) in April 2020. In April 2020, there was a significant fall of 185.25 CIED implantations compared to 2018 [95% confidence interval (CI) 129.6-240.9; P < 0.001] and of 188 CIED compared to 2019 (95% CI 132.3-243.7; P < 0.001). No significant differences in the type of PM or ICD were observed, nor in the indication for primary or secondary prevention. CONCLUSIONS: During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, a substantial decrease in CIED implantations was observed in Catalonia. Our findings call for measures to avoid long-term social impact.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Defibrillators, Implantable/trends , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Prosthesis Implantation/trends , Humans , Patient Safety , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Spain , Time Factors
4.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 44(2): 266-273, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33433913

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterize contemporary pacemaker procedure trends. METHODS: Nationwide analysis of pacemaker procedures and costs between 2008 and 2017 in Australia. The main outcome measures were total, age- and gender-specific implant, replacement, and complication rates, and costs. RESULTS: Pacemaker implants increased from 12,153 to 17,862. Implantation rates rose from 55.3 to 72.6 per 100,000, a 2.8% annual increase (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.028; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04; p < .001). Pacemaker implants in the 80+ age group were 17.37-times higher than the < 50 group (95% CI 16.24-18.59; p < .001), and in males were 1.48-times higher than in females (95% CI 1.42-1.55; p < .001). However, there were similar increases according to age (p = .10) and gender (p = .68) over the study period. Left ventricular lead rates were stable (IRR 0.995; 95% CI 0.98-1.01; p = .53). Generator replacements decreased from 20.5 to 18.3 per 100,000 (IRR 0.975; 95% CI 0.97-0.98; p < .001). Although procedures for generator-related complications were stable (IRR 0.995; 95% CI 0.98-1.01; p = .54), those for lead-related complications decreased (IRR 0.985; 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p < .001). Rates for all pacemaker procedures were consistently greater in males (p < .001). Although annual costs of all pacemaker procedures increased from $178 million to $329 million, inflation-adjusted costs were more stable, rising from $294 million to $329 million. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing demand for pacemaker implants is driven by the ageing population and rising rates across all ages, while replacement and complication procedure rates appeared more stable. Males have consistently greater pacemaker procedure rates than females. Our findings have significant clinical and public health implications for healthcare resource planning.


Subject(s)
Pacemaker, Artificial , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Pacemaker, Artificial/economics , Pacemaker, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Procedures and Techniques Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Procedures and Techniques Utilization/trends , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
5.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 22(5): 335-343, 2021 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32941324

ABSTRACT

Demographic characteristics of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices have significantly changed during the last few years, according to the ageing of the population and the consequent increase in the number of elderly individuals with indication for pacemaker implant and, on the other hand, to the increased number of young individuals implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for the primary prevention of sudden death. More and more often, both elderly and young patients ask the physician to deal with the device in their daily activities, which often include sport practice. This latter is advisable because of its recognized benefits on cardiovascular prevention, although there are many limitations for patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device. Hence, the need to balance the patient's request with the appropriate precautions emerging from existing evidence. The current article aims to provide an overview of the most recent data on this topic, derived from registries and observational studies. Over the years an attempt to standardize recommendations has been made, but robust evidence is still lacking. Substantial differences exist between countries based on their sports regulations. Official recommendations of European and American Scientific Societies are resumed. The future perspective is to obtain data to allow these patients a safer practice of sport activity also through technological advances in terms of device materials and programming improvement and the possibility of remote monitoring.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Defibrillators, Implantable , Pacemaker, Artificial , Patient Preference , Sports , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/prevention & control , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Defibrillators, Implantable/psychology , Defibrillators, Implantable/trends , Directive Counseling/methods , Directive Counseling/trends , Humans , Pacemaker, Artificial/psychology , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Sports/legislation & jurisprudence , Sports/standards , Sports/trends
6.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 81(10): 92-103, 2020 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33135932

ABSTRACT

This article provides an overview of current cardiac device management, complications, and future areas for development. The last 70 years have seen huge advances in the field of implantable cardiac devices, from diagnostic tools to electrical therapies for bradycardia, ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac resynchronisation. While out-of-hours specialist cardiology cover and regional arrhythmia pathways are increasingly established, they are not universal, and the management of arrhythmia remains an important facet of clinical medicine for the general physician. This article discusses core recommendations from international guidelines with respect to heart rhythm diagnostics, pacing for bradycardia, cardiac resynchronisation and implantable cardioverter defibrillators, along with common complications. Finally, future innovations such as the diagnostic potential of portable technologies, antibiotic envelopes for cardiac devices and the increasing use of leadless pacemakers are described.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Cardiology , Defibrillators, Implantable , Pacemaker, Artificial , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Bradycardia/diagnosis , Bradycardia/therapy , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/trends , Cardiology/trends , Defibrillators, Implantable/trends , Humans , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends
9.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 21(6): 420-427, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32332379

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing (TTCP) is a standard procedure in current practice, despite limited coverage in consensus guidelines. However, many authors reported several complications associated with TTCP, especially development of infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). The aim of this survey was to provide a country-wide picture of current practice regarding TTCP. METHODS: Data were collected using an online survey that was administered to members of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing. RESULTS: We collected data from 102 physicians, working in 81 Italian hospitals from 17/21 regions. Our data evidenced that different strategies are adopted in case of acute bradycardia with a tendency to limit TTCP mainly to advanced atrioventricular block. However, some centers reported a greater use in elective procedures. TTCP is usually performed by electrophysiologists or interventional cardiologists and, differently from previous reports, mainly by a femoral approach and with nonfloating catheters. We found high inhomogeneity regarding prevention of infections and thromboembolic complications and in post-TTCP management, associated with different TTCP volumes and a strategy for management of acute bradyarrhythmias. CONCLUSION: This survey evidenced a high inhomogeneity in the approaches adopted by Italian cardiologists for TTCP. Further studies are needed to explore if these divergences are associated with different long-term outcomes, especially incidence of CIED-related infections.


Subject(s)
Bradycardia/therapy , Cardiac Electrophysiology/trends , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/trends , Cardiologists/trends , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac/trends , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Bradycardia/diagnosis , Bradycardia/physiopathology , Health Care Surveys , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Humans , Italy
10.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 21(4): 305-314, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32073430

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of remote monitoring in Italian clinical practice and its trend over the last 5 years. METHODS: In 2012 and 2017, two surveys were conducted. Both were open to all Italian implanting centres and consisted of 25 questions on the characteristics of the centre, their actual use of remote monitoring, applied organizational models and administrative and legal aspects. RESULTS: The questionnaires were completed by 132 and 108 centres in 2012 and 2017, respectively (30.6 and 24.7% of all Italian implanting centres). In 2017, significantly fewer centres followed up fewer than 200 patients by remote monitoring than in 2012, while more followed up more than 500 patients (all P < 0.005). In most of the centres (77.6%) that responded to both surveys, the number of patients remotely monitored significantly increased from 2012 to 2017.In both surveys, remote monitoring was usually managed by physicians and nurses. Over the period, primary review of transmissions by physicians declined, while it was increasingly performed by nurses; the involvement of technicians rose, while that of manufacturers' technical personnel decreased. The percentage of centres in which transmissions were submitted to the physician only in critical cases rose (from 28.3 to 64.3%; P < 0.001). In 86.7% of centres, the lack of a reimbursement system was deemed the main barrier to implementing remote monitoring. CONCLUSION: In the last 5 years, the number of patients followed up by remote monitoring has increased markedly. In most Italian centres, remote monitoring has increasingly been managed through a primary nursing model. The lack of a specific reimbursement system is perceived as the main barrier to implementing remote monitoring .


Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable/trends , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Practice Patterns, Nurses'/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Remote Sensing Technology/trends , Telemedicine/trends , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/trends , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Informed Consent , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/trends , Italy , Practice Patterns, Nurses'/economics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Prosthesis Failure , Remote Sensing Technology/economics , Remote Sensing Technology/instrumentation , Telemedicine/instrumentation , Time Factors
11.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 54(4): 239-247, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32054352

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) first implants in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in a Swedish tertiary university hospital. Design: Clinical and technical data on pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) first implants performed in HCM patients at the Karolinska University Hospital from 2005 to 2016 were extracted from the Swedish Pacemaker and ICD Registry. Echocardiographic data were obtained by review of hospital recordings. Results: The number of first pacemaker implants in HCM patients was 70 (1.5% of total pacemaker implants). The mean age of HCM pacemaker patients was 71 ± 10 years. Pacemaker implants were almost uniformly distributed between genders. Dual-chamber pacemakers with or without CRT properties were prevalent (6 and 93%, respectively). The number of first ICD implants in HCM patients was 99 (5.1% of total ICD implants). HCM patients receiving an ICD were 53 ± 15 years and prevalently men (70%). Sixty-five (66%) patients were implanted for primary prevention. Dual-chamber ICDs with or without CRT were 21 and 65%, respectively. Obstructive HCM was present in 47% pacemaker patients and 25% ICD patients with available pre-implant echo. Conclusions: This retrospective registry-based study provides a picture of CIED first implants in HCM patients in a Swedish tertiary university hospital. ICDs were the most commonly implanted devices, covering 59% of CIED implants. HCM patients receiving a pacemaker or an ICD had different epidemiological and clinical profiles.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/trends , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic/therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable/trends , Electric Countershock/trends , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/trends , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/trends , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic/diagnostic imaging , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic/epidemiology , Electric Countershock/instrumentation , Female , Hospitals, University/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Sweden/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers/trends , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
13.
Int J Cardiol ; 300: 154-160, 2020 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31402163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While major complications associated with CIED lead extractions are uncommon, they carry a significant risk of morbidity and mortality in the absence of surgical intervention. However, there is limited data on the differences in outcomes of these procedures between centers with and without on-site CS support. The present study examined outcomes of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extractions according to admitting hospitals' cardiac surgery (CS) facilities. METHODS: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample for CIED lead extraction procedures, stratified by hospitals' CS facilities into two groups; on-site and off-site CS. Logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the adjusted odds (aOR) of procedure-related complications in off-site CS centers. RESULTS: In 221,606 procedures over an 11-year-period, CIED lead extractions were increasingly undertaken in on-site as opposed to off-site CS centers (Onsite CS 2004 vs. 2014: 78.2% vs. 90.4%, p < 0.001) during the study period. In comparison to on-site CS group, patients admitted to off-site CS group were older, less comorbid, and experienced lower adjusted odds of major adverse cardiovascular events (0.72 [0.67, 0.77]), mortality (0.60 [0.52, 0.69]), procedure-related bleeding (0.48 [0.44, 0.54]) and complications (thoracic: 0.81 [0.75, 0.88]; cardiac: 0.45 [0.38, 0.54]) (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Our national analysis demonstrates that transvenous CIED lead extractions are being increasingly undertaken in centers with on-site CS surgery, in compliance with international guideline recommendations. Patients managed with lead extractions in on-site CS centers are more comorbid and critically ill compared to those admitted to off-site CS centers, and remain at a higher risk of procedure-related complications.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/trends , Cardiology Service, Hospital/trends , Defibrillators, Implantable/trends , Device Removal/trends , Electrodes, Implanted/trends , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Databases, Factual/trends , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Electrodes, Implanted/adverse effects , Female , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
14.
Circulation ; 140(25): e944-e963, 2019 12 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31694402

ABSTRACT

The widespread use of cardiac implantable electronic devices and wearable monitors has led to the detection of subclinical atrial fibrillation in a substantial proportion of patients. There is evidence that these asymptomatic arrhythmias are associated with increased risk of stroke. Thus, detection of subclinical atrial fibrillation may offer an opportunity to reduce stroke risk by initiating anticoagulation. However, it is unknown whether long-term anticoagulation is warranted and in what populations. This scientific statement explores the existing data on the prevalence, clinical significance, and management of subclinical atrial fibrillation and identifies current gaps in knowledge and areas of controversy and consensus.


Subject(s)
American Heart Association , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Defibrillators, Implantable/standards , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Pacemaker, Artificial/standards , Wearable Electronic Devices/standards , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable/trends , Humans , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Wearable Electronic Devices/trends
15.
Eur Heart J ; 40(44): 3641-3648, 2019 11 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31504437

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The objective of the current study is to investigate the risk of heart failure (HF) after implantation of a pacemaker (PM) with a right ventricular pacing (RVP) lead in comparison to a matched cohort without a PM and factors associated with this risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients without a known history of HF who had a PM implanted with an RVP lead between 2000 and 2014 (n = 27 704) were identified using Danish nationwide registries. An age- and gender-matched control cohort (matched 1:5, n = 138 520) without PM and HF was identified to compare the risk. Outcome was the cumulative incidence of HF including fatal HF within the first 2 years of PM implantation, with all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) as competing risks. Due to violation of proportional hazards, the follow-up period was divided into three time-intervals: <30 days, 30-180 days, and >180 days-2 years. The cumulative incidence of HF including fatal HF was observed in 2937 (10.6%) PM patients. Risks for the three time-intervals were <30 days [hazard ratio (HR) 5.98, 95% CI 5.19-6.90], 30-180 days (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.71-1.98), and >180 days (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.17). Among patients with a PM device, factors associated with increased risk of HF were male sex (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.24-1.43), presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.29-2.09), and prior MI (1.77, 95% 1.50-2.09). CONCLUSIONS: Pacemaker with an RVP lead is strongly associated with risk of HF specifically within the first 6 months. Patients with antecedent history of MI and CKD had substantially increased risk.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/methods , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart Ventricles/physiopathology , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Risk Assessment
16.
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi ; 43(4): 235-237, 2019 Jul 30.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31460710

ABSTRACT

In order to improve the accuracy of the pacemaker's parameter adjustment and to avoid the surgical replacement of the pacemaker when the battery is exhausted, this paper designs a novel single-chamber pacemaker circuit based on low-power single-chip microcomputer. The circuit uses digital control to accurately control the amplitude, pulse width and frequency of the pacing pulse. The circuit is also designed with wireless charging function, and wireless communication with the programmer can wirelessly charge the pacemaker and know the charging information in real time. Wireless charging function can reduce the number of times the patient replaces the pacemaker or even completely avoid it.


Subject(s)
Equipment Design , Pacemaker, Artificial , Electric Power Supplies , Humans , Pacemaker, Artificial/standards , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends
17.
PLoS One ; 14(8): e0219533, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31393871

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is an effective treatment for ventricular tachycardia (VT). We evaluated the efficacy of different ATP programs based on a large remote monitoring data set from patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS: A dataset from 18,679 ICD patients was used to evaluate the first delivered ATP treatment. We considered all device programs that were used for at least 50 patients, leaving us with 7 different programs and a total of 32,045 episodes. We used the two-proportions z-test (α = 0.01) to compare the probability of success and the probability for acceleration in each group with the corresponding values of the default setting. RESULTS: Overall, the first ATP treatment terminated in 78.4%-97.5% of episodes with slow VT and 81.5%-91.1% of episodes with fast VT. The default setting of the ATP programs with the number of sequences S = 3 was applied to treat 30.1% of the slow and 36.6% of the fast episodes. Reducing the maximum number of sequences to S = 2 decreased the success rate for slow VT (P < 0.0001, h = 0.38), while the setting S = 4 resulted in the highest success rate of 97.5% (P < 0.0001, h = 0.27). CONCLUSION: While the default programs performed well, we found that increasing the number of sequences from 3 to 4 was a promising option to improve the overall ATP performance.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/methods , Tachycardia, Ventricular/therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable/trends , Electric Countershock/methods , Electrocardiography , Humans , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Tachycardia, Ventricular/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
18.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 19(1): 197, 2019 08 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31412773

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiac pacing is a growing activity in Sub-Saharan Africa. There is little data on the characteristics of this interventional treatment in our regions. The goal was to evaluate the results of cardiac pacing in a referral service in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: We carried out a twelve-year retrospective study (from January 1st, 2004 to December 31st, 2015) in the Cardiology Department of Aristide Le Dantec University Hospital. This work included all patients who received definitive cardiac pacing during the study period and followed up in the service. RESULTS: In total we included 606 patients. There was a growing trend in activity with a peak in 2015 (17%). The average age was 70.6 ± 12.03 years. Some patients (15.4%) came from the subregion. The patients were mostly of medium socio-economic level (53%); 14% were of low socio-economic level. Patients were symptomatic in 85% of cases (37.4% syncope). The indications were dominated by complete atrioventricular block (81.5%); sinus dysfunction accounted for 1.9% of them. A temporary pacemaker was used in 60% of cases for an average duration of 5.1 ± 6.3 days. Antibiotics, local anesthesia and analgesics were used in all cases. Implanted pacemakers were single chamber in 56% of cases and double chamber in 44% of cases. In 39 patients (6.4%), the pacemaker was a « re-used ¼ one. The atrial leads were most often placed in a lateral position (94.5%). The ventricular ones were predominantly tined (95.7%) and more often located at the apical level. Complications were noted in 24 patients (3.9%), dominated by devices externalizations and infections, which together accounted for 2.7% of cases. The number of people in the cathlab was significantly higher and the duration of the temporary pacemaker was longer for patients who had a complication. There was no significant difference depending on the type of pacemaker used (new or reused). Seven (7) in hospital death cases were reported. CONCLUSION: Cardiac pacing is a growing activity in Dakar.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/trends , Cardiology Service, Hospital/trends , Hospitals, Teaching/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/mortality , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/adverse effects , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/mortality , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Referral and Consultation/trends , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Senegal , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
19.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 20(8): 531-541, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31259858

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aim of this survey was to assess the management and organization of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) replacement in Italy. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of 24 questions on organizational aspects and on the peri-procedural management of anticoagulant therapies and antibiotic prophylaxis was sent via the Internet to 154 Italian arrhythmia centers. RESULTS: A total of 103 out of 154 centers completed the questionnaire (67% response rate). In 43% of the centers, the procedures were performed under day-case admission, in 40% under ordinary admission, and in 17% under either day-case or ordinary admission. The most frequent reason (66%) for choosing ordinary admission rather than day-case admission was to obtain full reimbursement. Although warfarin therapy was continued in 73% of the centers, nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants were discontinued, without bridging, 24 h or less prior to replacement procedures in 88%. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy was systematically administered in all centers; in 97%, the first antibiotic dose was administered 1-2 h prior to procedures. Local antibacterial envelopes were also used in 43% of the centers in patients with a higher risk of device infection. CONCLUSION: This survey provides a representative picture of how CIED replacements are organized and managed in current Italian clinical practice. The choice of the type of hospitalization (short versus ordinary) was more often motivated by economic reasons (reimbursement of the procedure) than by clinical and organizational factors. Peri-procedural management of anticoagulation and prophylactic antibiotic therapy was consistent with current scientific evidence.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/trends , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/trends , Defibrillators, Implantable/trends , Device Removal/trends , Electric Countershock/trends , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/economics , Defibrillators, Implantable/economics , Device Removal/adverse effects , Device Removal/economics , Drug Administration Schedule , Electric Countershock/economics , Electric Countershock/instrumentation , Health Care Costs , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Italy , Length of Stay , Pacemaker, Artificial/economics , Patient Admission , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Prosthesis Failure , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...