Parp1-Dependent DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Irradiated Late Pachytene Spermatocytes.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (Parp1) is a member of nuclear enzymes family involved in to the response to genotoxic stresses, DNA repair, and is critical for the maintenance of genome stability. During gametogenesis, genome stability is essential for inheritance and formation of healthy gametes. The latter involves DNA double-strand break (DSB)-driven pairing of homologous chromosomes in first meiotic prophase. By analysis of DSB repair kinetics in male meiotic prophase cells of homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ)-deficient mouse models, we previously demonstrated an interplay between HR and the conventional NHEJ repair pathway. In the current work, we evaluate the relative contribution of Parp1-dependent NHEJ to the repair of ectopic ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DSBs in control and Parp1-inhibited mouse pachytene spermatocytes before and after the completion of meiotic recombination in stages VI-XI. The disappearance of large, exogenous DSB-related γ-H2AX foci was quantified 1 and 8 h after 1 Gy γ-irradiation of control and 3,4-dihydro-5-[4-(1-piperidinyl)butoxy]-1(2H)quinolinone (DPQ) Parp1-inhibited mice. Late pachytene control spermatocytes obtained 8 h after IR had repaired >80% of DSBs observed at 1 h after IR. However, only 64% of DSBs were repaired in late spermatocytes of DPQ-treated (Parp1-inhibited) mice. Thus, it appears that Parp1 contributes to the repair of a fraction of DSBs in late prophase I, providing further insights in DNA repair pathway choreography during spermatogenic differentiation.

Radiation dosimetry and repair kinetics of DNA damage foci in mouse pachytene spermatocyte and round spermatid stages.

Accurate quantification of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) in testicular germ cells is difficult because of cellular heterogeneity and the presence of endogenous γH2AX. Here, we used confocal microscopy to quantify DNA damage and repair kinetics following γ-irradiation (0.5-4 Gy) in three major mouse male germ cell stages, early and late pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids (RSs), following a defined post irradiation time course. Dose-response curves showing linear best fit validated γH2AX focus as a rapid biodosimetric tool in these substages in response to whole body in vivo exposure. Stage specific foci yield/dose and repair kinetics demonstrated differential radiosensitivity and repair efficiency: early pachytenes (EP) repaired most rapidly and completely followed by late pachytene (LP) and RSs. Repair kinetics for all three stages followed 'exponential decay' in response to each radiation dose. In pachytenes immediate colocalisation of γH2AX and 53BP1, which participates in non-homologous end-joining repair pathway, was followed by dissociation from the major focal area of γH2AX by 4 h demonstrating ongoing DSB repair. These results confirm the differential radiosensitivity and repair kinetics of DSBs in male germ cells at different stages. Taken together, our results provide a simple and accurate method for assessing DNA damage and repair kinetics during spermatogenesis.

Dynamics of radiation induced γH2AX foci in chromatin subcompartments of mouse pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids.

Chromatin compaction is thought to influence the severity of radiation-induced DNA damage. We assessed how chromatin state affects DNA double-strand break repair within eu-/heterochromatin domains in male germ cells by profiling the spatiotemporal dynamics of γ-radiation-induced γH2AX foci in confocal images of mouse pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids (5 min to 16 hr post-irradiation, in vivo). In unirradiated cells, all DNA-dense heterochromatin domains showed compaction by anti-H3K9me3-staining, except for peripheral areas. Following irradiation, this signal was lost within 5 min, but regained later (8-16 hr); these two events coincided with the appearance and loss of γH2AX foci, respectively. While euchromatin showed a large number of bright foci in both cell types, heterochromatin had few foci. In spermatids, a few small, faint foci appeared within chromocenters. Pachytene-stage, on the other hand, lacked foci within heterochromatin, although a few were closely associated with the heterochromatin periphery. The number of euchromatin foci in spermatids showed a dose-dependent enhancement following irradiation (0.5-4 Gy), although no significant increase was seen in the quantity of heterochromatin foci. While all foci in pachytene-stage cells were resolved, spermatids showed large residual foci-especially from heterochromatin foci, which remained faint for up to 4 hr, then increased in size between 8-16 hr, expanding at the chromocenter periphery and eventually protruding into euchromatin at H3K9me3-signal-free areas. Thus, this study identified scant foci formation and poor repair within heterochromatin, with distinctly different dynamics in meiotic and post-meiotic stages of spermatogenesis, and provides direct evidence for heterochromatin decompaction following DNA damage, which facilitates repair/repositioning of foci towards euchromatin domains. It is the first demonstration of spatiotemporal mobilization of double-strand breaks with respect to chromatin subdomains in male germ cells.

Gamma-irradiation increased meiotic crossovers in mouse spermatocytes.

In mice, the occurrence of immunofluorescent foci for mismatch repair protein MLH1 correlates closely with the occurrence of crossovers, as detected genetically, and MLH1 foci represent virtually all prospective crossover positions. To examine the effects of γ-irradiation on meiotic crossovers in mouse spermatocytes, male mice were subjected to whole-body γ-irradiation at different sub-stages of meiotic prophase and crossovers on synaptonemal complexes (SCs) were analysed by visualising and quantifying the immunofluorescent MLH1 foci. At both 24 and 48 h after exposure, significant dose-dependent increases in the number of total MLH1 foci per spermatocyte were observed at late zygotene-early pachytene with the gradient increase of radiation dose from 0, 1.5, 3-6 Gy. Furthermore, irradiation at preleptotene-leptotene still led to significant dose-dependent increased meiotic crossovers in the spermatocytes analysed 120 h after exposure. In further analysis, these dose-dependent increases in the number of total MLH1 foci per cell were attributed to significant dose-dependent decreases in autosomal SCs with 0 MLH1 focus, and the dose-dependent increases in autosomal SCs with 2 MLH1 foci and the percentage of cells with MLH1 focus on XY bivalent. The increased number of cells with an MLH1 focus on the pseudoautosomal regions (PARs) may indicate that there is a delay in meiotic progression in the irradiated cells. Although significant dose-dependent increases in the number of total MLH1 foci per cell were examined 24, 48 or 120 h after exposure with the gradient increase of radiation doses, these increases were mild compared to the control groups. This suggests that there is tight control of crossover formation (at least with respect to MLH1 foci number). The mechanisms underlying irradiation-induced DNA lesion repair, cellular responses independent of DNA damage and meiotic crossover homeostasis in mammals will be the subjects of future study.

Drosophila PCH2 is required for a pachytene checkpoint that monitors double-strand-break-independent events leading to meiotic crossover formation.

During meiosis, programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired to create at least one crossover per chromosome arm. Crossovers mature into chiasmata, which hold and orient the homologous chromosomes on the meiotic spindle to ensure proper segregation at meiosis I. This process is usually monitored by one or more checkpoints that ensure that DSBs are repaired prior to the meiotic divisions. We show here that mutations in Drosophila genes required to process DSBs into crossovers delay two important steps in meiotic progression: a chromatin-remodeling process associated with DSB formation and the final steps of oocyte selection. Consistent with the hypothesis that a checkpoint has been activated, the delays in meiotic progression are suppressed by a mutation in the Drosophila homolog of pch2. The PCH2-dependent delays also require proteins thought to regulate the number and distribution of crossovers, suggesting that this checkpoint monitors events leading to crossover formation. Surprisingly, two lines of evidence suggest that the PCH2-dependent checkpoint does not reflect the accumulation of unprocessed recombination intermediates: the delays in meiotic progression do not depend on DSB formation or on mei-41, the Drosophila ATR homolog, which is required for the checkpoint response to unrepaired DSBs. We propose that the sites and/or conditions required to promote crossovers are established independently of DSB formation early in meiotic prophase. Furthermore, the PCH2-dependent checkpoint is activated by these events and pachytene progression is delayed until the DSB repair complexes required to generate crossovers are assembled. Interestingly, PCH2-dependent delays in prophase may allow additional crossovers to form.

C. elegans germ cells switch between distinct modes of double-strand break repair during meiotic prophase progression.

Chromosome inheritance during sexual reproduction relies on deliberate induction of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) and repair of a subset of these breaks as interhomolog crossovers (COs). Here we provide a direct demonstration, based on our analysis of rad-50 mutants, that the meiotic program in Caenorhabditis elegans involves both acquisition and loss of a specialized mode of double-strand break repair (DSBR). In premeiotic germ cells, RAD-50 is not required to load strand-exchange protein RAD-51 at sites of spontaneous or ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DSBs. A specialized meiotic DSBR mode is engaged at the onset of meiotic prophase, coincident with assembly of meiotic chromosome axis structures. This meiotic DSBR mode is characterized both by dependence on RAD-50 for rapid accumulation of RAD-51 at DSB sites and by competence for converting DSBs into interhomolog COs. At the mid-pachytene to late pachytene transition, germ cells undergo an abrupt release from the meiotic DSBR mode, characterized by reversion to RAD-50-independent loading of RAD-51 and loss of competence to convert DSBs into interhomolog COs. This transition in DSBR mode is dependent on MAP kinase-triggered prophase progression and coincides temporally with a major remodeling of chromosome architecture. We propose that at least two developmentally programmed switches in DSBR mode, likely conferred by changes in chromosome architecture, operate in the C. elegans germ line to allow formation of meiotic crossovers without jeopardizing genomic integrity. Our data further suggest that meiotic cohesin component REC-8 may play a role in limiting the activity of SPO-11 in generating meiotic DSBs and that RAD-50 may function in counteracting this inhibition.

Characterization of Spo11-dependent and independent phospho-H2AX foci during meiotic prophase I in the male mouse.

Meiotic DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are indicated at leptotene by the phosphorylated form of histone H2AX (gamma-H2AX). In contrast to previous studies, we identified on both zygotene and pachytene chromosomes two distinct types of gamma-H2AX foci: multiple small (S) foci located along autosomal synaptonemal complexes (SCs) and larger signals on chromatin loops (L-foci). The S-foci number gradually declined throughout pachytene, in parallel with the repair of DSBs monitored by repair proteins suggesting that S-foci mark DSB repair events. We validated this interpretation by showing the absence of S-foci in Spo11(-/-) spermatocytes. By contrast, the L-foci number was very low through pachytene. Based on the analysis of gamma-H2AX labeling after irradiation of spermatocytes, the formation of DSBs clearly induced L-foci formation. Upon DSB repair, these foci appear to be processed and lead to the above mentioned S-foci. The presence of L-foci in wild-type pachytene and diplotene could therefore reflect delayed or unregulated DSB repair events. Interestingly, their distribution was different in Spo11(+/-) spermatocytes compared with Spo11(+/+) spermatocytes, where DSB repair might be differently regulated as a response to homeostatic control of crossing-over. The presence of these L-foci in Spo11(-/-) spermatocytes raises the interesting possibility of yet uncharacterized alterations in DNA or chromosome structure in Spo11(-/-) cells.

Temporal analysis of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation and repair in Drosophila females.

Using an antibody against the phosphorylated form of His2Av (gamma-His2Av), we have described the time course for the series of events leading from the formation of a double-strand break (DSB) to a crossover in Drosophila female meiotic prophase. MEI-P22 is required for DSB formation and localizes to chromosomes prior to gamma-His2Av foci. Drosophila females, however, are among the group of organisms where synaptonemal complex (SC) formation is not dependent on DSBs. In the absence of two SC proteins, C(3)G and C(2)M, the number of DSBs in oocytes is significantly reduced. This is consistent with the appearance of SC protein staining prior to gamma-His2Av foci. However, SC formation is incomplete or absent in the neighboring nurse cells, and gamma-His2Av foci appear with the same kinetics as in oocytes and do not depend on SC proteins. Thus, competence for DSB formation in nurse cells occurs with a specific timing that is independent of the SC, whereas in the oocytes, some SC proteins may have a regulatory role to counteract the effects of a negative regulator of DSB formation. The SC is not sufficient for DSB formation, however, since DSBs were absent from the heterochromatin even though SC formation occurs in these regions. All gamma-His2Av foci disappear before the end of prophase, presumably as repair is completed and crossovers are formed. However, oocytes in early prophase exhibit a slower response to X-ray-induced DSBs compared to those in the late pachytene stage. Assuming all DSBs appear as gamma-His2Av foci, there is at least a 3:1 ratio of noncrossover to crossover products. From a comparison of the frequency of gamma-His2Av foci and crossovers, it appears that Drosophila females have only a weak mechanism to ensure a crossover in the presence of a low number of DSBs.