Use of a haired angularis oris axial pattern flap in a dog to correct a large oronasal fistula secondary to resection of a hard palate multilobular osteochondrosarcoma.

A 6-year-old neutered male mixed-breed dog underwent curative-intent surgical resection of a hard palatal multilobular osteochondrosarcoma and closure of the defect using bilateral buccal mucosal flaps. However, failure of the flaps resulted in a massive hard palatal defect that was subsequently repaired using a haired skin angularis oris axial pattern flap. This report describes the clinical outcome using this surgical approach and novel complications encountered. Key clinical message: The haired skin angularis oris axial pattern flap appears to be a suitable and robust option for reconstruction of large palatal defects.

Utilisation d'un lambeau cutanée poilus avec rotation axiale au niveau de l'artère angularis oris chez un chien pour corriger une fistule oronasale volumineuse secondaire à la résection d'un ostéochondrosarcome multilobulaire du palais dur. Un chien croisé mâle castré de 6 ans a subi une résection chirurgicale à visée curative d'un ostéochondrosarcome multilobulaire du palais dur et une fermeture de l'anomalie par des lambeaux de la muqueuse buccale. Cependant, la défaillance des lambeaux a entraîné un défaut important du palais dur qui a ensuite été réparé à l'aide d'un lambeau de peau avec poils avec rotation axiale au niveau de l'artère angularis oris. Ce rapport décrit les résultats cliniques de cette approche chirurgicale et les nouvelles complications rencontrées.Message clinique clé :L'utilisation d'un lambeau de peau avec poils avec rotation axiale au niveau de l'artère angularis oris semble être une option appropriée et robuste pour la reconstruction des défauts importants du palais.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Dehiscence and Fistula Formation Following Anterior Palatal Reconstruction With Vomer Flap.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Anterior palatal reconstruction using vomer flaps has been described during primary cleft lip repair. In this procedure, the mucoperiosteal tissue of the vomer is elevated to reconstruct the nasal mucosa overlying the cleft of the hard palate. Here the authors, evaluate the efficacy of a technique in which a superiorly based vomer flap is sutured to the lateral nasal mucosa. The authors assess vomer flap dehiscence rates and compare the likelihood of fistula development in this cohort to patients who underwent palatoplasty without vomer flap reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all palatoplasties performed by the senior author at an academic institution during a 7-year period. Medical records were reviewed for demographic variables, operative characteristics, and postoperative complications up to 1 year following surgery. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the effects of vomer flap reconstruction on fistula formation, adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS: Fifty-eight (N=58) patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 38 patients (control group) underwent cleft palate reconstruction without previous vomer flap placement. The remaining 20 patients underwent cleft lip repair with vomer flap reconstruction before palatoplasty (vomer flap group). When bilateral cases were counted independently, 25 total vomer flap reconstructions were performed. Seventeen of these 25 vomer flap reconstructions (68%) were completely dehisced by the time of cleft palate repair. In the vomer flap group, 3 of the 20 patients (15%) developed fistulas in the anterior hard palate following the subsequent palatoplasty procedure. In the control group, only 1 of the 38 patients (2.6%) developed a fistula in the anterior hard palate. There was no significant association between cohorts and the development of anterior hard palate fistulas [odds ratio=10.88, 95% confidence interval (0.99-297.77) P =0.07], although analysis was limited by low statistical power due to the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population, anterior palatal reconstruction using a superiorly based vomer flap technique was associated with complete dehiscence in 68% of cases. Fistula formation in the anterior hard palate was also proportionately higher following initial vomer flap reconstruction (15% versus 2.6%). These results prompted the senior author to adjust his surgical technique to 1 in which the vomer flap overlaps the oral mucosa. While follow-up from these adjusted vomer flap reconstruction cases remains ongoing, early evidence suggests a reduced requirement for surgical revision following implementation of the modified technique.

Two-stage palatal repair in non-syndromic CLP patients using anterior to posterior closure is associated with minimal need for secondary palatal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the need for secondary palatal corrective surgery in a concept of palate repair that uses a protocol of anterior to posterior closure of primary palate, hard palate and soft palate. METHODS: A data base of patients primarily operated between 2001 and 2021 at the Craniofacial and Cleft Care Center of the University Goettingen was evaluated. Cleft lips had been repaired using Tennison Randall and Veau-Cronin procedures in conjunction with alveolar cleft repair. Cleft palate repair in CLP patients was accomplished in two steps with repair of primary palate and hard palate first using vomer flaps at the age of 10-12 months and subsequent soft palate closure using Veau/two-flap procedures 3 months later. Isolated cleft palate repair was performed in a one-stage operation using Veau/two-flap procedures. Data on age, sex, type of cleft, date and type of surgery, occurrence and location of oronasal fistulae, date and type of secondary surgery performed for correction of oronasal fistula (ONF)and / or Velophyaryngeal Insufficiency (VPI) were extracted. The rate of skeletal corrective surgery was registered as a proxy for surgery induced facial growth disturbance. RESULTS: In the 195 patients with non-syndromic complete CLP evaluated, a total number of 446 operations had been performed for repair of alveolar cleft and cleft palate repair (Veau I through IV). In 1 patient (0,5%), an ONF occurred requiring secondary repair. Moreover, secondary surgery for correction of VPI was required in 1 patient (0,5%) resulting in an overall rate of 1% of secondary palatal surgery. Skeletal corrective surgery was indicated in 6 patients (19,3%) with complete CLP in the age group of 15 - 22 years (n = 31). CONCLUSIONS: The presented data have shown that two-step sequential cleft palate closure of primary palate and hard palate first followed by soft palate closure has been associated with minimal rate of secondary corrective surgery for ONF and VPI at a relatively low need for surgical skeletal correction.

Impact of a Palatal Fistula After Cleft Palate Repair on Velopharyngeal Closure.

PURPOSE: A palatal fistula is an adverse outcome of cleft palate repair. It is unknown if a palatal fistula will influence velopharyngeal closure, even after repair of the fistula. This study determines the effect of a soft palate fistula on the risk of developing velopharyngeal insufficiency. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent primary cleft palate repair between 2000 and 2015, with complete records at 4 years of age. Fistulae involving the secondary palate following primary palatoplasty were classified as the soft or hard palate. A forced-entry multivariate logistic regression model was built to detect predictors of velopharyngeal dysfunction. RESULTS: Records of 329 patients were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. A palatal fistula was identified in 89/329 patients (27%) and 29/329 patients (9%) underwent an independent fistula repair. Of the patients with fistula, 44% were located in the hard palate only and 56% had soft palate involvement. Compared to patients without a fistula, rates of velopharyngeal dysfunction were significantly higher in patients with a fistula involving the soft palate (OR 3.875, CI: 1.964-7.648, P < .001) but not in patients with a hard palate fistula (OR 1.140, CI: 0.497-2.613, P = .757). Veau class, age at primary repair, and syndromic status were not significant predictors of VPI (0.128≤P ≤ .975). CONCLUSIONS: A palatal fistula involving the soft palate is a significant predictor for development of velopharyngeal dysfunction after primary palatoplasty. Surgical intervention, at the time of fistula repair, to add vascularized tissue may be indicated to prophylactically decrease the risk of velopharyngeal dysfunction.

Use of a barrier membrane to repair congenital hard palate defects and to close oronasal fistulae remaining after cleft palate repair: seven dogs (2019-2022).

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of a barrier membrane in dogs for repair of congenital hard palate defects and closure of oronasal fistulae (ONF) remaining after previous cleft palate (CFP) repair. ANIMALS: 7 client-owned dogs. METHODS: The hard palate defect was closed with medially positioned flaps (Von Langenbeck technique) or pedicle flaps (2-flap palatoplasty) and a membrane composed of autologous auricular cartilage from the pinna or allogenous fascia lata underlying the mucoperiosteal flaps. RESULTS: All palate defects were considered to have a high risk of dehiscence based on their type and size and the characteristics of the surrounding tissue. The barrier membrane was used in 5 dogs for repair of congenital hard palate defects and in 2 dogs for closure of ONF remaining after previous CFP repair. Resolution of clinical signs occurred in all cases. Complete success (ie, complete closure of the palate defect and absence of clinical signs) was achieved in 5 dogs (4 with congenital hard palate defects and 1 with an ONF remaining after previous CFP repair). The persistent ONF in 1 dog with functional success (incomplete closure, but no clinical signs) was smaller than prior to surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Barrier membranes underlying mucoperiosteal flaps may constitute an alternative technique in dogs for repair of congenital hard palate defects and closure of ONF remaining after previous CFP repair.

[Assessment of the structural features of the hard palate in endonasal surgery]. / Otsenka anatomii tverdogo neba v khirurgii peregorodki nosa.

Data on the features of the anatomical structure of the hard palate are little described in the scientific literature, and therefore are not taken into account when planning surgical treatment. One of the intraoperative complications during intervention on the lower part of the nasal septum is perforation of the bottom of the nasal cavity, which can develop during a christotomy. This complication mainly depends on the features of the anatomical structure of the hard palate. OBJECTIVE: To study the anatomical structure of the hard palate from the point of view of rhinosurgery, using vector analysis of multispiral computed tomography (MSCT), and to establish anatomical features that should be taken into account when performing surgical interventions on the nasal septum. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 107 patients (30 men, 77 women) were examined without congenital cleft palate and surgical interventions on the structures of the nasal cavity and hard palate. All patients underwent MSCT of the nose and paranasal sinuses (PNS) followed by multiplanar image reconstruction. The key point relative to which the measurements were carried out was the posterior wall of the incisor canal from the side of the nasal cavity. The line corresponding to the bottom of the nasal cavity was chosen as the main vector. In the work, measurements of the thickness of the hard palate (THP) at the level of the palatal suture and the width of the palatal suture (WPS) were carried out. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of the obtained results showed that the THP is 1.74 mm [min 0.28; max 6.46], the WPS is 0.9 mm [min 0.2; max 2.51] (conditional norm). In 19 patients (17.8%), the THP was 0.82 mm, in 2 patients (1.9%) - 0.2 mm. In 3 patients (2.8%), the WPS was equal to 2.5 mm. CONCLUSION: Thus, the data obtained by us indicate that the surgical anatomy of the hard palate is characterized by significant variability, while in some patients the THP can be reduced by 8.8 times, and the WPS increased by 2.7 times compared to normal values. Such anatomical features of the structure of the hard palate should be taken into account when planning septoplasty, since this contingent of patients has an increased risk of developing iatrogenic perforation of the nasal floor during surgical intervention on the lower floor of the nasal septum.

Speech Outcomes Audit for Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate After 2-Stage Palate Repair: Preliminary Results.

Primary cleft lip and palate surgeries can interfere with speech status, facial appearance, maxillary growth, and psychosocial and academic development. Therefore, different surgical protocols and techniques have been proposed, and adequate velopharyngeal function and speech is the main goal for the treatment success. The present study aimed to report preliminary speech results of the 2-stage palate repair of children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. One hundred seventy nonsyndromic patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate were included in this report, 35% males and 65% females, submitted to the 2-stage palatoplasty protocol, composed by lip, nasal ala, and hard palate repair at 3 to 6 m (stage 1) and soft palate repair at 12 to 18 m (stage 2). The target age range for speech recording was 5 to 10 years, and the speech material included repetition of Brazilian Portuguese sentences. These samples were obtained over 5 years and assessed by 3 of 14 experienced speech pathologists. When discordant, the majority rate was adopted. Average velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) rates were 19,5%, varying according to the soft palate technique, with better results when the Sommerlad technique was performed (VPD=11%), followed by Braithwaite (VPD=15%) and then Von Langenbeck (VPD=25%). Passive errors were observed in 32% and active errors in 25%. Speech results reflect the outcomes of an interdisciplinary team's work, where facial growth and nasolabial appearance must also be considered. Further analysis and a wider casuistic are recommended. Hence outcomes audit needs to be a permanent process, providing solid and updated evidence for optimal cleft care.

[The use of intraosseous appliances considering the anatomical features of the hard palate]. / Ispol'zovanie vnutrikostnykh apparatov s uchetom anatomicheskikh osobennostei tverdogo neba.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study. To improve the effectiveness of patients' treatment with narrow upper jaw by improving the stability of intraosseous devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 40 patients with the narrow upper jaw, from 12 to 40 years old, were treated. 50 self-drilling orthodontic miniscrews of each manufacturer, i.e. «BioRay¼, Taiwan, «Turbo¼, Russia, a total of 100 items, were inserted into a palate. RESULTS: The greatest thickness of the cortical bone relative to the sagittal plane was observed at a distance of 6 mm from the incisor canal, which averages 6.32 mm. Relative to the transversal plane, the greatest bone thickness was observed 3 mm laterally from the median palatine suture and averages 7.62 mm. The smallest thickness of the mucous membrane of the hard palate is noted 6 mm distal from the incisor canal and 3 mm laterally from the palatine suture is on average 4.56 mm. CONCLUSION: The protocol for determining the individual position of the miniscrew for each patient, taking into account all his anatomical features, is a necessary tool for clinical success.

Oncological outcomes and prognostic factors of squamous cell carcinoma of the upper gingiva and hard palate: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Despite sharing the same staging system as oral cavity cancers, upper gingiva and hard palate (UGHP) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have several features that make them a different entity. We aimed to analyze oncological outcomes and adverse prognostic factors of UGHP SCC, and assess an alternate T classification specific to UGHP SCC. METHODS: Retrospective bicentric study including all patients treated by surgery for a UGHP SCC between 2006 and 2021. RESULTS: We included 123 patients with a median age of 75 years. After a median follow-up of 45 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local control (LC) were 57.3%, 52.7% and 74.7%, respectively. Perineural invasion, tumor size, bone invasion, pT classification and pN classification were statistically associated with poorer OS, DFS and LC on univariate analysis. On multivariable analysis, the following variable were statistically associated with a poorer OS: past history of HN radiotherapy (p = 0.018), age > 70 years (p = 0.005), perineural invasions (p = 0.019) and bone invasion (p = 0.030). Median survivals after isolated local recurrence were 17.7 and 3 months in case of surgical and non-surgical treatment, respectively (p = 0.066). The alternate classification allowed better patient distribution among T-categories, however without improving prognostication. CONCLUSION: There is a broad variety of clinical and pathological factors influencing prognosis of SCC of the UGHP. A comprehensive knowledge of their prognostic factors may pave the way towards a specific and more appropriate classification for these tumors.

Long-term Outcome for Two-Stage Palatal Closure With Different Timings for Hard Palate Surgery: Craniofacial Growth and Dental Arch Relation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate dental arch relation and craniofacial growth for individuals born with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), who had two-stage palatal surgery, with hard palate closure (HPC) at the ages of 3 or 8 years. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Ceft lip and palate team in Gothenburg, Sweden. PATIENTS: The inclusion criteria were nonsyndromic individuals born with complete UCLP who were consecutively operated according to two different surgical protocols; soft palate closure at 6 months followed by hard palate closure at the age of 3 years (HPC3) or at the age of 8 years (HPC8). In this evaluation, 28 individuals had HPC3 and 59 individuals had HPC8. INTERNVENTIONS: The main outcome, longitudinal series of dental casts and lateral radiographs from the ages of 5, 10, 16, and 19 years, were evaluated using GOSLON Yardstick and cephalometric analysis. RESULTS: At the age of 10 years, 78% of the individuals with HPC3 demonstrated GOSLON scores of 1 and 2 and 86% in HPC8. At the age of 19 years, 54% of the individuals exhibited GOSLON scores of 1or 2 when compared with 74% in HPC8. A statistical significant difference for SNA was observed at the age of 5 years (P = .004), with a lower SNA in HPC3, but not at the ages of 10, 16 and 19 years. At the final age, SNA was 75.2° for HPC3 and 76.8° for HPC8. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in age for HPC did not have an adverse effect on long-term dental arch relationship or craniofacial growth.

Bilateral collagenous fibroma of the hard palate: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Collagenous fibroma or desmoplastic fibroblastoma is a rare benign fibrous tissue tumor. It usually presents as a painless, slowly growing mass. Collagenous fibroma arises ordinarily inside the subcutaneous tissues or skeletal muscles. Histopathologically, the tumor consists of scattered stellate and spindle cells in a hypovascular collagenous stroma without atypia or infiltration. The oral cavity is a very uncommon site for desmoplastic fibroblastoma. Only 15 published articles in the literature reported the intraoral location. We present a case of collagenous fibroma with a bilateral distribution on the hard palate. This is the second case of bilateral collagenous fibroma after a previously reported one in literature; however, our case was larger, occupying almost the whole palate. We discuss the management of this rare tumor and how we can reach definite diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old Caucasian female patient had a huge bilateral firm palatal mass that caused breathing problems. There was no history of trauma and the patient had no relevant medical history Total surgical excision under general anesthesia was carried out and histopathological examination suggested a benign mesenchymal tumor. Immunohistochemistry was necessary to confirm the tumor origin and to exclude aggressive fibromatosis. A diagnosis of bilateral collagenous fibroma was reached. Six months after surgery, there was no recurring lesion and the patient's health was good. CONCLUSIONS: Collagenous fibroma is a benign fibrous tissue tumor of unknown cause that is treated with simple excision. The prognosis is good with no recurrence. Reaching an accurate diagnosis is mandatory to avoid aggressive treatment since collagenous fibroma may be misdiagnosed as aggressive fibromatosis in case of massive size. Clinicians and pathologists should be aware of this unusual tumor for conservative management without side effects.

Labial Vestibular Flap Closure of the Cleft Palate Is Advantageous for Maxillary Development.

Objective: Using labial vestibular flap was performed to close the primary alveolar and hard palate cleft at the second stage of early 2-stage closure surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate for minimizing the damage to the maxillary periosteum. We analyzed maxillary development to clarify the influence of cleft palate surgery. Design: Retrospective longitudinal study in 5 years after primary palatal closure. Setting: Institutional study Patients: Study subjects included 214 patients with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who were consecutively treated in our clinic. Main Outcome: We used a 3D dental model scanner to assess maxillary development in patients aged 3 months to 5 years after using either the conventional pushback method (PB) (51 cases) or 2-stage closure (Local palatal flap closure: LF [67 cases] and Labial vestibular flap closure: VF [96 cases]). Results: Comparing the measurement results, the major axis of maxilla, width, intercanine distance, and intermolar distance was significantly larger in the LF group compared to the PB group. After the age of 3, the cleft side of VF group had grown significantly to compare with LF group in width. It was also confirmed that the inserted labial mucosal flap itself grew. Enlargement of the labial mucosal flap was observed at all sites except the canine. Conclusion: Good maxillary growth occurred in the following order: VF groups > LF group > PB group. Poor growth was correlated with the extent of periosteal damage during surgery and the degree of postoperative bone surface exposure.

Subperiosteal inferior maxillectomy in mucormycosis patients: case series.

OBJECTIVE: Mucormycosis is a rapidly progressive and fulminant fungal infection mainly affecting the nose and paranasal sinuses and often requiring aggressive surgical debridement, which commonly includes inferior maxillectomy. Conventional inferior maxillectomy involves removal of the bony hard palate and its mucoperiosteum. This can lead to formation of an oroantral fistula and thereby increase the morbidity in these patients leading to prolonged rehabilitation. Subperiosteal inferior maxillectomy involves sparing of the uninvolved mucoperiosteum of the hard palate. This flap is used for closure of the oroantral fistula, which preserves the functional capabilities of the patient, such as speech, mastication and deglutination. METHOD: This case series describes the experience of using the technique of mucosa-preserving subperiosteal inferior maxillectomy in five patients with mucormycosis. RESULTS: With the technique used in this study, complete oronasal separation was achieved in all six patients. The overall surgery time was also decreased when compared with free tissue transfer. Patients also did not have to bear the weight of prosthesis. CONCLUSION: Mucoperiosteal palatal flap-preserving subperiosteal inferior maxillectomy is an excellent approach for all patients with mucormycosis and healthy palatal mucosa.

Pediatric Oral Neurovascular Hamartoma of the Hard Palate: A Clinicopathologic Report.

We hereby present the first-reported pediatric case of a hard palate neurovascular hamartoma in a male newborn, in which the diagnosis was established following an initial nondiagnostic biopsy, extensive radiological investigations, and eventual wide local excision. These benign lesions can easily be mistaken for malignant diagnoses, leading to increased parental and child anxiety as well as avoidable diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.

Long-term Follow-up of Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Incidence of Speech-Correcting Surgeries and Fistula Formation.

While bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) constitutes a clinical challenge for the whole cleft team, the ideal surgical protocol remains obscure. This study presents the long-term burden of care in terms of secondary surgeries, defined as fistula repair and speech-correcting surgeries (SCS), in a single center. Outcomes of two surgical protocols utilized over the years were also compared.A retrospective single-center analysis of 81 non-syndromic children with complete BCLP born between 1990 and 2010. Two surgical protocols comprising single-stage and two-stage (delayed hard palate closure) procedures were compared. Outcome was analyzed at the time of alveolar bone grafting (ABG) and post-ABG.Altogether 54 children (66.7%) had underwent secondary surgery by the time of bilateral ABG. At this point, 38.3% (n = 31) of patients had received SCS and 49.4% (n = 40) had undergone fistula repair. The corresponding incidences at the end of follow-up were 46.9% (n = 38) and 53.1% (n = 43). No significant difference emerged in SCS incidence between the 2 protocols; however, prior to ABG the single-stage protocol had a significantly lower need for fistula repair. Regarding the location of fistulas, some differences were observed, with the single-stage procedure more associated with anterior fistulas.BCLP has a high surgical burden of care in terms of secondary surgeries, defined as SCS and fistula repair. In our experience, the single-stage protocol, particularly the two-flap technique, offers better results in the management of BCLP than the two-stage approach with a short delay in hard palate closure.

Occlusal Evaluation Using Modified Huddart and Bodenham Scoring System Following 2-Stage Palatoplasty With Hotz Plate: A Comparison Among 3 Different Surgical Protocols.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if the change in technique of soft palate closure or timing of hard palatal repair induced occlusal changes in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTINGS: A medical and dental hospital in Japan. SUBJECTS: A total of 96 patients with CUCLP treated with 2-stage palatoplasty were included in the study and categorized into 3 groups (G1, G2, and G3) according to the protocol used. INTERVENTIONS: G1 underwent soft palate repair using Perko method at 1.5 years of age and hard palate repair using vomer flap procedure at 5.5 years of age. Furlow method was used for soft palate repair in G2 at 1.5 years of age and hard palate repair using vomer flap procedure at 5.5 years of age. The Furlow method was used to repair the soft palate in G3 at 1.5 years of age and vomer flap procedure was used to repair the hard palate at 4 years of age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two evaluators assessed the dental arch relationship using the modified Huddart/Bodenham (mHB) index on 2 separate occasions. RESULTS: Intra- (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.962) and inter-examiner (ICC: 0.950) reliability showed very good agreement. The frequency of crossbite present in the major and minor segments gradually decreased with each change in protocol. Mean segmental scores showed no significant difference between 3 protocols (P > .05). Good inter-arch alignment occurred with all 3 surgical protocols (G1:82.6%, G2:89.8%, and G3:91.7%). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the dental arch relationship outcomes between the 3 surgical protocols. The dentition status was comparable with all surgical protocols, even after the changes.

Current Surgical Practice for Children Born with a Cleft lip and/or Palate in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: This study describes primary surgical reconstructions performed for children born with a cleft lip and/or palate (CL ± P) in the United Kingdom (UK). DESIGN: Data forms completed at the time of surgery included details on timing, technique, and adjuncts used during the operative period. Demographic data on participants were validated via parental questionnaires. SETTING: Data were obtained from the Cleft Collective, a national longitudinal cohort study. PATIENTS: Between 2015 and 2021, 1782 Cleft Collective surgical forms were included, relating to the primary reconstructions of 1514 individual children. RESULTS: The median age at primary cheiloplasty was 4.3 months. Unilateral cleft lips (UCL) were reconstructed with an anatomical subunit approximation technique in 53%, whereas bilateral cleft lips (BCL) were reconstructed with a broader range of eponymous techniques. Clefts of the soft palate were reconstructed at a median age of 10.3 months with an intravelar veloplasty in 94% cases. Clefts of the hard palate were reconstructed with a vomer flap in 84% cases in a bimodal age distribution, relating to reconstruction carried out simultaneously with either lip or soft palate reconstruction. Antibiotics were used in 96% of cases, with an at-induction-only regimen used more commonly for cheiloplasties (P < .001) and a 5 to 7-day postoperative regime used more commonly for soft palatoplasties (P < .001). Perioperative steroids were used more commonly in palatoplasties than cheiloplasties (P < .001) but tranexamic acid use was equivalent (P = .73). CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to our understanding of current cleft surgical pathways in the UK and will provide a baseline for analysis of the effectiveness of utilized protocols.

Update of the classification of midpalatal suture behaviour after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion using computed tomography.

The aim of this study was to update the midpalatal suture classification after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) using computed tomography (CT). Thirty-five patients with a transverse maxillary deficiency and unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite underwent SARME with osteotomy of the pterygoid apophysis of the sphenoid. CT was performed before installation of the Hyrax expander appliance and after the final activation. Opening of the midpalatal suture was classified into three types: type I, total midpalatal suture opening from anterior nasal spine (ANS) to posterior nasal spine (PNS); type II, partial midpalatal suture opening from ANS to the transverse palatine suture, with partial or non-existent opening of the midpalatal suture posterior to the transverse palatine suture; type III, complete maxillary opening from ANS, but not of PNS, because a paramedian fracture completed the opening of the hard palate. Type I was observed in 42.8% of the patients, type II in 40%, and type III in 17.2%. Opening of the transverse palatine suture was found in all midpalatal suture opening patterns and was more frequent in type III, followed by type II and type I. CT was used to update the classification of midpalatal suture patterns, with the inclusion of type III: total opening of the hard palate due partly to opening of the midpalatal suture and partly to a paramedian fracture.

Midpalatal suture bone repair after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in adults.

BACKGROUND: Midpalatal suture (MPS) repair in growing patients after RPE has been previously reported. However, differences between young and adult patients for timing and pattern of MPS repair after rapid maxillary expansion are expected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the midpalatal suture repair pattern after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) in adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 21 patients (six males, 15 females) successfully treated with MARPE with a mean initial age of 29.1 years of age (SD = 8.0; range = 20.1-45.1). MPS repair was evaluated using maxillary axial and coronal sections derived from CBCT exams taken 16 months after the expansion (SD = 5.9). Objective and subjective assessments of MPS repair were performed. Objective assessments were performed measuring MPS bone density at anterior, median and posterior region of hard palate. Pre-expansion and post-retention bone density changes were evaluated using paired t tests (p < 0.05). Midpalatal suture bone repair was scored 0 to 3 considering, respectively, the complete absence of bone repair in the MPS, the repair of less than 50% of the MPS, the repair of more than 50% of the MPS and the complete repair of the MPS. Intra- and interexaminer reliability evaluation were assessed using Kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The objective evaluation showed a significant higher bone density at the pre-expansion stage in all palatal regions. The reliability of the subjective method was adequate with intra- and interexaminer agreements varying from 0.807 to 0.904. Scores 1, 2 and 3 were found in 19.05%, 38.09% and 42.86% of the sample, respectively. The most common region demonstrating absence of bone repair was the middle third. The anterior third of the midpalatal suture was repaired in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: A decreased bone density was observed after the retention period when compared to pre-expansion stage. Most adult patients demonstrated incomplete repair of the midpalatal suture 16 months after MARPE. However, adequate bone repair covering more than half of the hard palate extension was observed in 80.95% of the patients.

A Novel Forceps for Preventing Mucosal Damage of the Hard Palate in Maxilla Mobilization During Le Fort I Osteotomy.

At present, the most effective and common strategy to mobilize the maxilla is to use Rowe disimpaction forceps. But because of the directed forces on the hard palate, the mucosa of the hard palate will have to receive an ineluctable mechanical injury. Therefore, we introduce a novel forceps (Patent No. 202110966069.X China), which can accurately and steadily clamp the maxilla on the premise of protecting the hard palate mucosa from loss of palatal vascularity and pressure necrosis, and then thoroughly mobilize the maxilla. Complaints and mucosal damage were not observed in the initial 3 patients.