Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Energy Devices in Bench Surgery for Pancreas Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Bench surgery for the preparation of deceased donor pancreatic grafts is labor-intensive and time-consuming. We hypothesized that energy devices could be used during bench surgery to decrease the bench surgery time. However, because bench surgery has two unique characteristics, wet conditions and no blood flow in the vessels, it is necessary to verify the safety and efficacy under such conditions. METHODS: In an animal tissue model, we validated both ultrasonic and bipolar energy devices: Harmonic Shears and the LigaSure (LS) vessel-sealing device by evaluating heat spread and pressure resistance under bench surgery conditions. In a clinical evaluation of the LS, we compared the outcomes of 22 patients in two different bench surgery groups: with and without the use of the LS. RESULTS: Clinically, the bench surgery time was significantly shorter in the LS group than that in the conventional group (P < 0.001). In the animal tissue experiments, the highest temperature in bench surgery conditions was 60.4°C after 1 s at a 5-mm distance in the LS group. Pressure resistance of ≥ 750 mmHg was achieved in almost all trials in both veins and arteries, with no difference between Harmonic Shears and LS. There was more surgical smoke visually in bench conditions versus in dry conditions and under half bite versus full bite conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The encouraging results of our exploratory clinical and animal studies of the energy devices suggest that they may be useful in the setting of bench surgery.

Robotic-assisted pancreas transplantation: where are we today?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To analyze the current status of robotic-assisted pancreas transplantation as a treatment option for diabetic patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Pancreas transplant recipients continue to suffer high rates of technical complications, including wound infections, fascial dehiscence, and postoperative ventral hernias. Robotic technology can potentially contribute to decreasing these dangerous complications and improve the postoperative course of pancreas transplantation. SUMMARY: Current literature on both robotic pancreas and robotic kidney transplant were reviewed in order to determine feasibility, safety, and efficacy of robotic pancreas transplantation. To date, only three cases of robotic pancreas transplantation, two of which were solely pancreas transplantation and one combined pancreas-kidney transplantation, have been reported in a single publication by an Italian group. Their preliminary data show that robotic pancreas transplantation is feasible and well tolerated. The authors believe that robotic pancreas transplantation could have a prominent role in lone pancreas transplantation performed in overweight recipients, in parallel to their experience with fully robotic kidney transplant in morbidly obese candidates. Broader experience with this innovative approach will be necessary to establish if robotic pancreas transplantation will be a beneficial option for diabetic patients needing beta-cell replacement.

Current state of pancreas preservation and implications for DCD pancreas transplantation.

One of the main factors limiting potential uptake of pancreas transplantation, particularly in the United Kingdom, is the shortage of grafts. There has therefore been a recent expansion, particularly in the United Kingdom, in the utilization of grafts from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors. These grafts are subjected to a greater ischemic insult and are arguably at higher risk of poor functional outcome. Although conventional preservation techniques may be adequate for donation after brain death (DBD) and low-risk DCD pancreases, as the number of DCD pancreas transplants increase and the threshold for rejecting organs decreases, the importance of optimal preservation techniques is going to increase. Over recent years, there have been significant advances in preservation techniques for DCD kidneys, improving the outcome of these marginal grafts. However, the use of such techniques for pancreas preservation is extremely limited and mainly historical. This overview describes the background and results of the established method of pancreas preservation for DBD, namely, cold static storage, and describes the use of the two-layer method. It also reviews pulsatile machine perfusion and normothermic perfusion for pancreas preservation techniques, which have shown promise in the preservation of DCD kidney grafts. The use of these techniques in pancreas preservation is predominantly historical but warrants reevaluation as to the feasibility of applying these techniques to DCD pancreas grafts not only for preservation but also for viability assessment. Further areas for development of pancreas preservation are discussed.

Pancreas preservation for pancreas and islet transplantation: a minireview.

Pancreas preservation by cold storage using University of Wisconsin solution was the mainstay method used for pancreas transplantation during the past 2 decades. Other solutions, such as HTK, Celsior, and SCOT 15, could not demonstrate any advantage for short preservation periods. But the advent of clinical islet transplantation and the larger use of controlled non-heart-beating donors have prompted the transplantation community to develop methods for increasing pancreas graft quality while preventing ischemic reperfusion damages. Oxygenation by 1- or 2-layer methods during pancreas preservation, as well as the use of perfluorocarbons, might increase the islet yield. Based on the former methods, there is a renewed interest in machine perfusion and oxygenation in pancreas preservation for pancreas transplantation and islet preparation.

Current perspectives on laparoscopic robot-assisted pancreas and pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Pancreas transplant recipients continue to suffer high surgical morbidity. Current robotic technology provides a unique opportunity to test whether laparoscopy can improve the post-operative course of pancreas transplantation (PT). Current knowledge on robotic pancreas and renal transplantation was reviewed to determine feasibility and safety of robotic PT. Information available from literature was included in this review, together with personal experience including three PT, and two renal allotransplants. As of April 2011, the relevant literature provides two case reports on robotic renal transplantation. The author's experience consists of one further renal allotransplantation, two solitary PT, and one simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Information obtained at international conferences include several other renal allotransplants, but no additional PT. Preliminary data show that PT is feasible laparoscopically under robotic assistance, but raises concerns regarding the effects of increased warm ischemia time on graft viability. Indeed, during construction of vascular anastomoses, graft temperature progressively increases, since maintenance of a stable graft temperature is difficult to achieve laparoscopically. There is no proof that progressive graft warming produces actual damage to transplanted organs, unless exceedingly long. However, this important question is likely to elicit a vibrant discussion in the transplant community.

The linear cutting stapler for enteric anastomosis: a new technique in pancreas transplantation.

The drainage of pancreatic exocrine secretions following pancreas transplantation is an evolving area of surgical practice. We describe a new technique applying a 55 mm Linear Cutting Stapler (LCS) to create the duodenoenterostomy for enteric drainage of the pancreas transplant. Twenty simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantations performed between April 2005 and March 2006 were reviewed. Using a prospective database and chart review, complications and outcome related to the new technique of exocrine drainage were described. During this 12 month period, 19 of 20 consecutive simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantations have been performed using the linear cutting stapler techinque. No complications relating to the enteric anastomosis have been demonstrated. In our initial experience, use of the LCS is both safe and easy to perform.

Use of vascular closure staples in vascular access for dialysis, kidney and pancreas transplantation.

We report our experience with the use of the vascular closure staples (VCS) in vascular access for dialysis, as well as in kidney and pancreas transplantation. We used the VCS for 50 endogenous arterio-venous fistulas (AVFs). There were no complications. The use of the VCS contributed in creating an excellent anastomosis and minimising operative time. All AVFs are in use for dialysis (follow up two months to one year). The excellent results from our experience with the use of VCS for vascular access encouraged us to use them in kidney and pancreas transplantation. We performed six cadaveric kidney transplants (the first operation was the first application of the VCS in kidney transplantation in Europe) and two cadaveric pancreas-kidney transplants (the first operation being the first application of the VCS in pancreas transplantation in the world). There were no complications. The use of VCS created an excellent anastomosis and minimised warm ischaemia time. All kidney transplant recipients have normal creatinines (follow up 1-5 months) and the recipients of pancreatic transplants are insulin independent (follow up 1-3 months).

[Use of the circular stapler for duodenal-cystic anastomosis in pancreas transplantation]. / Pouzití cirkulárního stapleru k provedení duodenocystoanastomózy pri transplantaci slinivky brisní.

The number of combined transplantations of the pancreas and kidney in type I diabetics with chronic renal failure is increasing every year. The authors present their experience with a new technique of duodenocystostomy during this transplantation. The use of a circular stapler to create the duodenocystoanastomosis can hasten the surgical procedure and reduce at the same time the risk of development of a pancreatic fistula.