Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Duct Drainage.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD) is a method of decompressing the pancreatic duct (PD) if unable to access the papilla or surgical anastomosis, particularly in nonsurgical candidates. The 2 types of EUS-PDD are EUS-assisted pancreatic rendezvous (EUS-PRV) and EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy (EUS-PG). EUS-PRV should be considered in patients with accessible papilla or anastomosis, while EUS-PG is a comparable alternative in surgically altered foregut anatomy. While technical and clinical successes range from 79% to 100%, adverse events occur in approximately 20%. A multidisciplinary approach that considers the patient's anatomy, clinical indication, and long-term goals should be discussed with surgical and interventional radiology colleagues.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for the Management of Pancreatic Duct Leaks and Fistulas.

Pancreatic duct (PD) leaks are a common complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis, trauma to the pancreas, and pancreatic surgery. Diagnosis of PD leaks and fistulas is often made with contrast-enhanced pancreatic protocol computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging with MRCP. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography with pancreatic duct stenting in appropriately selected patients is often an effective treatment, helps to avoid surgery, and is considered first-line therapy in cases that fail conservative management.

Persistent chronic calcific pancreatitis with intraductal calculi associated with secondary diabetes mellitus type 3 and diabetic ketoacidosis - A case report.

Diabetes mellitus type 3 refers to diabetes secondary to an existing disease or condition of the exocrine pancreas and is an uncommon cause of diabetes occurring due to pancreatogenic pathology. It accounts for 15-20% of diabetic patients in Indian and Southeast Asian continents. This is case report of a rare case of type 3 diabetes mellitus (T3DM) presenting with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). The patient was admitted for DKA along with complaint of hyperglycemia, blood glucose of 405 mg/dl with HbA1c level of 13.7%. Computed tomography evidence revealed chronic calcific pancreatitis with intraductal calculi and dilated pancreatic duct.

Current considerations on intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct and pancreatic duct.

Pancreatobiliary intraductal papillary neoplasms (IPNs) represent precursors of pancreatic cancer or bile duct cholangiocarcinoma that can be detected and treated. Despite advances in diagnostic methods, identifying these premalignant lesions is still challenging for treatment providers. Modern imaging, biomarkers and molecular tests for genomic alterations can be used for diagnosis and follow-up. Surgical intervention in combination with new chemotherapeutic agents is considered the optimal treatment for malignant cases. The balance between the risk of malignancy and any risk of resection guides management policy; therefore, treatment should be individualized based on a meticulous preoperative assessment of high-risk stigmata. IPN of the bile duct is more aggressive; thus, early diagnosis and surgery are crucial. The conservative management of low-risk pancreatic branch-duct lesions is safe and effective.

Pancreaticoureteric fistula following penetrating abdominal trauma: A Case Report.

Pancreaticoureteric Fistula (PUF) is a very rare complication secondary to penetrating abdominal trauma involving the ureter and pancreatic parenchyma. Pancreatic injuries carry h igh morbidity due to the involvem ent of surrounding structures and are d ifficult to diagnose due to thei r retroperitoneal location. A case of a patient is reported at Civil Hospital, Hyderabad who presented with a history of firearm injury and missed pancreatic duct involvement on initial exploration that eventually led to the development of Pan creaticoureteric Fistula. He was managed v ia p erc ut aneous nep hrostomy ( PCN ) for the right ureteric injury and pancreatic duct (PD) stenting was done for distal main pancreatic duct injury (MPD).

[Double extrahepatic bile duct with pancreaticobiliary maljunction:a case report].

A 76-year-old woman with a suspected double extrahepatic bile duct was referred to our hospital. MRCP revealed that the left hepatic and posterior ducts combined to form the ventral bile duct and that the anterior duct formed the dorsal bile duct. ERCP demonstrated that the ventral bile duct was linked with the Wirsung duct. Amylase levels in the bile were unusually high. Based on these findings, we diagnosed a double extrahepatic bile duct with pancreaticobiliary maljunction and choledocholithiasis. Duplicate bile duct resection and bile duct jejunal anastomosis were performed considering the risk of biliary cancer due to pancreaticobiliary maljunction. The resected bile duct epithelium demonstrated no atypia or hyperplastic changes.

Anatomical attention can help to segment the dilated pancreatic duct in abdominal CT.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic duct dilation is associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer, the most lethal malignancy with the lowest 5-year relative survival rate. Automatic segmentation of the dilated pancreatic duct from contrast-enhanced CT scans would facilitate early diagnosis. However, pancreatic duct segmentation poses challenges due to its small anatomical structure and poor contrast in abdominal CT. In this work, we investigate an anatomical attention strategy to address this issue. METHODS: Our proposed anatomical attention strategy consists of two steps: pancreas localization and pancreatic duct segmentation. The coarse pancreatic mask segmentation is used to guide the fully convolutional networks (FCNs) to concentrate on the pancreas' anatomy and disregard unnecessary features. We further apply a multi-scale aggregation scheme to leverage the information from different scales. Moreover, we integrate the tubular structure enhancement as an additional input channel of FCN. RESULTS: We performed extensive experiments on 30 cases of contrast-enhanced abdominal CT volumes. To evaluate the pancreatic duct segmentation performance, we employed four measurements, including the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), sensitivity, normalized surface distance, and 95 percentile Hausdorff distance. The average DSC achieves 55.7%, surpassing other pancreatic duct segmentation methods on single-phase CT scans only. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed an anatomical attention-based strategy for the dilated pancreatic duct segmentation. Our proposed strategy significantly outperforms earlier approaches. The attention mechanism helps to focus on the pancreas region, while the enhancement of the tubular structure enables FCNs to capture the vessel-like structure. The proposed technique might be applied to other tube-like structure segmentation tasks within targeted anatomies.

Value of the surgical pancreatic duct anatomy and associated outcomes in pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer recurrence following surgery is a significant challenge, and personalized surgical care is crucial. Topographical variations in pancreatic duct anatomy are frequent but often underestimated. This study aimed to investigate the potential importance of these variations in outcomes and patient survival after Whipple's procedures. METHODS: Data were collected from 105 patients with confirmed pancreatic head neoplasms who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2020. Radiological measurements of pancreatic duct location were performed, and statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS. RESULTS: Inferior pancreatic duct topography was associated with an increased rate of metastatic spread and tumour recurrence. Additionally, inferior duct topography was associated with reduced overall and recurrence-free survival. Posterior pancreatic duct topography was associated with decreased incidence of perineural sheet infiltration and improved overall survival. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that topographical diversity of pancreatic duct location can impact outcomes in Whipple's procedures. Intraoperative review of pancreatic duct location could help surgeons define areas of risk or safety and deliver a personalized surgical approach for patients with beneficial or deleterious anatomical profiles. This study provides valuable information to improve surgical management by identifying high-risk patients and delivering a personalized surgical approach with prognosis stratification.

Correlation between main pancreatic duct diameter measurements: Special pancreatic ultrasonography versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation is reported to be a risk factor for pancreatic cancer (PC). Although magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and ultrasonographic modalities are valuable for monitoring the pancreas, there is limited information on the efficacy of different imaging modalities in measuring MPD diameter. To improve pancreatic imaging, we developed a specialized ultrasound approach focusing on the pancreas (special pancreatic US). We aimed to examine the correlation between MPD diameter measurements using special pancreatic US versus MRCP. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients with MPD dilation (≥2.5 mm) via special pancreatic US used for screening at our institution between January 2020 and October 2022 and included patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging 2 months before and after pancreatic US. The MPD diameter on MRCP was measured at the pancreatic locus, where the maximum MPD diameter was obtained on special pancreatic US. This study included 96 patients, with a median interval of 8.5 days between the date of special pancreatic US and the date of undergoing MRCP. MPD dilatation and/or pancreatic cysts were diagnosed in 86 patients, PC in 5 patients, and other diseases in 5 patients. The median MPD diameter, measured using special pancreatic US, was 3.4 mm (interquartile range: 2.9-4.9 mm), whereas it was 3.5 mm using MRCP (interquartile range: 2.8-4.5 mm). There were strong positive correlations between MPD diameter measured on special pancreatic US and that measured on MRCP (R = 0.925, P < .001). This study revealed strong positive correlations between the MPD diameter measurements using special pancreatic US and MRCP. MPD diameter measurements from each imaging method can be helpful during follow-up in individuals at a high risk of PC.