Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 9.035
Filter
1.
Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 40(4): 378-382, 2024 Apr.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710522

ABSTRACT

One of the most prevalent malignancies in women is cervical cancer. Cervical cancer is mostly brought on by chronic high-risk human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) and HPV18 infection. Currently, the widely used HPV vaccines are the bivalent Cervarix, the tetravalent Gardasil, and the 9-valent Gardasil-9.There are differences in T cell effector molecule changes, B cell antibody level, duration, age and the injection after vaccination of the three vaccines.


Subject(s)
B-Lymphocytes , Papillomavirus Vaccines , T-Lymphocytes , Humans , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Female , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Vaccination , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/immunology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18/immunology , Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18/administration & dosage , Human Papillomavirus Viruses
2.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 58(5): 577-587, 2024 May 06.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715495

ABSTRACT

Cervical cancer has become a global public health problem that poses a serious threat to women's health. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is an important primary preventive measure for cervical cancer. With the accelerated application of the HPV vaccine in China, conducting real-world studies (RWS) on the application of HPV vaccines can guide the rational use of the vaccine, which is of great significance for the strategy and practice of accelerating the elimination of cervical cancer in China. The Yangtze River Delta Cervical Cancer and Female Lower Genital Tract Infection Prevention and Control Alliance and Yangtze River Delta Immunization Integration Working Group organized an expert group to develop the "Expert recommendation for real-world study on the application of HPV vaccine in the Yangtze River Delta region". Based on the current situation of medical informatization and HPV vaccination administration in China, as well as literature and cases from domestic and international studies, this study describes the data chain of HPV vaccination and evaluation, introduces the study design, study direction, database construction, data governance and statistical analysis of RWS, and provides expert recommendation on the problems in carrying out the practice of HPV vaccine RWS, aiming to guide the RWS of HPV vaccine application and promote the generation of real-world evidence (RWE) in China.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , China , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Vaccination
3.
Epidemiol Serv Saude ; 33: e2023895, 2024.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716974

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the temporal trend of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage among the female population aged 10 to 14 years, living in the state of Goiás, Brazil, between 2014 and 2022. METHODS: This was an ecological time series study using data from the Brazilian National Health System Information Technology Department (Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde - DATASUS); the annual vaccination coverage rate was calculated based on the number of second doses administered; the trend of the rates was analyzed using the Prais-Winsten model. RESULTS: A total of 407,217 second doses of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine were administered to the female population aged 10-14 years, with annual vaccination coverage rates ranging from 12.3% (2019) to 30.0% (2015), and an annual percentage change (APC) of 0.7% (95%CI 0.9; 0.2; p-value = 0.030). CONCLUSION: In Góias state, the quadrivalent HPV vaccine coverage rate was below the national target (80%), showing a stationary trend in the time series.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Vaccination Coverage , Humans , Female , Brazil , Adolescent , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Child , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18/administration & dosage , Human Papillomavirus Viruses
4.
Glob Public Health ; 19(1): 2348646, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718287

ABSTRACT

The implementation of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is crucial for eliminating cervical cancer in India. The infodemic, characterised by misleading information, could hinder the successful implementation of the initiative. Misinformation related to the HPV vaccine, such as rumours, has been reported and circulated, contributing to an alarming pattern of vaccine hesitancy observed on social media. This study aimed to identify the public sentiment towards HPV vaccination based on the 'Behavioral and Social Drivers (BeSD)' framework through geospatial, content and sentiment analysis. A total of 1,487 tweets were extracted. After preprocessing, 1010 tweets were identified for sentiment and content analysis. The sentiments expressed towards the HPV vaccine are mixed, with a generally positive outlook on the vaccines. Within the population, there is a pervasive proliferation of misinformation, primarily focusing on vaccine safety and efficacy, contentious subjects, ethical considerations, and a prevalent sense of uncertainty in selecting the appropriate vaccine. These observations are crucial for developing targeted strategies to address public concerns and enhance vaccination rates. The insights gained from these results will guide policymakers, healthcare practitioners, and public health organisations to implement evidence-based interventions, thereby countering vaccine hesitancy and improving public health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Social Media , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , India , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Female , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccination Hesitancy , Public Opinion , Vaccination , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Human Papillomavirus Viruses
5.
S Afr Fam Pract (2004) ; 66(1): e1-e6, 2024 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708749

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:  Infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer and is one of the most prevalent sexually transmitted infections worldwide. Primary prevention strategies target reducing HPV acquisition through vaccination, limiting exposure (e.g. delayed sexual debut, barrier contraception) and health education focusing on sexual behaviour and tobacco use. METHODS:  The ImmunoVACCS study, conducted from 2019 to 2022 in two provinces in South Africa, examined sociodemographic characteristics, sexual practices, and knowledge of cervical cancer and the HPV vaccine among young female vaccine recipients. It encompassed participants from the previously conducted vaccine implementation trials, VACCS 1 and VACCS 2 (2011-2014). Recruitment involved telephonic contact with eligible potential participants. Data were collected through self-administered questionnaires. RESULTS:  One hundred and eleven participants took part in the current study (median age: 20 years; age range: 16-22 years). Most sexually active participants had their first engagement in secondary school (96.2%), and 77.2% used contraception during their last sexual activity. Knowledge gaps were evident, with only 13.5% recognising cervical cancer's cervix origin and 3.6% attributing it to a virus. Despite this, 70.3% had heard of a vaccine for cervical cancer. Less than half knew about the importance of regular Pap smears (49.5%), vaccine protection (44.1%) or condom use (20.7%) against HPV and cervical cancer. CONCLUSION:  The current study demonstrates that young women still lack complete information on cervical cancer and its risk factors even after receiving health education linked with vaccination.Contribution: This study underscores the necessity of ongoing education about HPV, its risks and preventive measures among young women to combat cervical cancer.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Sexual Behavior , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , South Africa/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
6.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1376748, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807996

ABSTRACT

Cervical cancer, primarily caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, poses a significant global health challenge. Due to higher levels of poverty and health inequities, Indigenous women worldwide are more vulnerable to cervical cancer than their non-Indigenous counterparts. However, despite constituting nearly 10% of the population in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), the true extent of the burden of cervical cancer among Indigenous people in this region remains largely unknown. This article reviews the available information on cervical cancer incidence and mortality, as well as HPV infection prevalence, among Indigenous women in LAC. The limited existing data suggest that Indigenous women in this region face a heightened risk of cervical cancer incidence and mortality compared to non-Indigenous women. Nevertheless, a substantial knowledge gap persists that must be addressed to comprehensively assess the burden of cervical cancer among Indigenous populations, especially through enhancing cancer surveillance across LAC countries. Numerous structural, social and cultural barriers hindering Indigenous women's access to HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening worldwide have been identified and are reviewed in this article. The discussion highlights the critical role of culturally sensitive education, community engagement, and empowerment strategies in overcoming those barriers. Drawing insights from the success of targeted strategies in certain high-income countries, the present article advocates for research, policies and healthcare interventions tailored to the unique context of LAC countries.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Female , Latin America/ethnology , Caribbean Region/ethnology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Indigenous Peoples/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence
7.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 644, 2024 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769529

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This paper aims to instigate discussion and publication of methodologies applied to enhance quality management through comprehensive scientific reports. It provides a detailed description of the design, implementation, and results of the quality control program employed in the SMESH study. METHODS: Cross-sectional, multicenter, national study designed to assess the prevalence of human papillomavirus in sex workers and in men who have sex with men (MSM). Respondent-driven sampling recruitment was used. An online system was developed for the study and checkpoints were defined for data entry. The system checked the quality of biological samples and performed a retest with part of the sample. RESULTS: A total of 1.598 participants (442 sex workers and 1.156 MSM) were included. Fifty-four health professionals were trained for face-to-face data collection. The retest showed Kappa values ranging between 0.3030 and 0.7663. CONCLUSION: The retest data were mostly classified as indicating a strong association. The data generated by the checkpoints showed the successful implementation of the quality control program.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Sex Workers/statistics & numerical data , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Quality Control , Prevalence
8.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am ; 51(2): 405-424, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777492

ABSTRACT

Gynecologists play a critical role in the office evaluation of transgender and gender diverse individuals. This includes the provision of essential healthcare services including the treatment and prevention of human immunodeficiency virus and sexually-transmitted infections and screening for human papillomavirus infection-related diseases and cancers. Caring for patients who identify as transgender or gender diverse (TGD) and who have undergone gender-affirming surgical treatments is challenging due in part to clinical gaps in knowledge resulting from insufficient training and educational resources. A patient-centered approach to the care of TGD individuals requires knowledge of the general principles of affirming, holistic care with attention to the risk factors, and anatomic considerations unique to this population. This review aims to provide basic knowledge needed for the successful gynecologic evaluation of a gender diverse patient.


Subject(s)
Sexual Health , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Transgender Persons , Humans , Female , Male , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/diagnosis
9.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2348845, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783608

ABSTRACT

Vaccination coverage against hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and human papillomaviruses (HPV) is insufficient among men who have sex with men (MSM), partly because of their high prevalence of vaccine hesitancy (VH) specific to these vaccines. This study aimed to investigate determinants of specific VH in MSM, focusing on characteristics of their sexual activity, propensity to use prevention tools and medical care, disclosure of sexual orientation to health care professionals (HCPs), and perceived stigmatization. A cross-sectional electronic survey (February - August 2022) collected perceptions of HBV, HAV, and HPV, and of their respective vaccines among 3,730 French MSM and enabled the construction of a specific VH variable. Using agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis, we constructed a typology of MSM sexual and prevention practices. We identified three MSM clusters (low- (C1, 24%), moderate- (C2, 41%), and high- (C3, 35%) "sexual activity/medical engagement") that showed an increasing gradient in the use of medical prevention with regular medical care and exposure to high-risk sexual practices. A multiple ordinal logistic regression showed that overall specific VH was higher in the C1 cluster and in men who had not informed their physician of their sexual orientation. This typology could usefully help to adapt vaccination communication strategies for MSM prevention program according to patients' profiles. HCPs should be encouraged and trained to ask men about their sexual practices and to provide appropriate vaccination recommendations nonjudgmentally.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B Vaccines , Homosexuality, Male , Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Sexual Behavior , Vaccination Hesitancy , Humans , Male , France , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Homosexuality, Male/psychology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Young Adult , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccination Hesitancy/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Hesitancy/psychology , Middle Aged , Hepatitis A Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis A/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Sexual and Gender Minorities/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
10.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2342622, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771122

ABSTRACT

To probe the understanding of healthcare providers regarding occupational exposure to human papillomavirus and their knowledge about human papillomavirus vaccination in relation to the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) recommendations. In this cross-sectional study, the healthcare providers at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota were delivered an electronic survey. The survey was completed by 349 healthcare providers, with one respondent excluded for inconsistent entry. The mean age of respondents was 42.7 ± 10.9, and of those, 68% were female and 32% were male. Of the unvaccinated respondents, 43.3% were ≤ 45 y of age (eligible for vaccination), while those vaccinated formed 41% of the respondents. Healthcare providers are highly concerned about their cancer safety, as shown by their awareness of occupational human papillomavirus hazards and broad knowledge about vaccine efficacy. The use of personal protective equipment varied widely, including eyewear, double gloving, procedural face mask, N95 face mask, and/or nothing. Human papillomavirus and cancer risk was clearly perceived by healthcare providers. For professions, pairwise comparisons revealed that nurse practitioners, physician assistants, certified registered nurse anesthetists, and allied healthcare providers had lower scores than medical doctors. Despite the high level of understanding among healthcare providers of occupational human papillomavirus exposure, only a few of them knew of the recommendations of the ASCPP for vaccination of healthcare providers treating human papillomavirus-related diseases. In such cases, most of those surveyed embraced vaccination, which was considered 100% safe by medical doctors and allied health professionals.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel , Occupational Exposure , Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Humans , Female , Male , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Papillomavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Adult , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Florida , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Minnesota , Arizona , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Personal Protective Equipment , Human Papillomavirus Viruses
11.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0301997, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781268

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Women living with HIV experience heightened risk of cervical cancer, and over 50% of cases in Southern Africa are attributed to HIV co-infection. Cervical cancer interventions tailored by HIV status delivered with HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) for treatment can decrease cancer incidence, but impact on HIV-related disparities remains understudied. METHODS: Using a dynamic model calibrated to KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, we projected HIV prevalence, cervical cancer incidence, and proportion of cancer cases among women living with HIV between 2021-2071. Relative to the status quo of moderate intervention coverage, we modeled three additive scenarios: 1) ART scale-up only; 2) expanded human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, screening, and treatment; and 3) catch-up HPV vaccination and enhanced screening for women living with HIV. RESULTS: Under the status quo, HIV prevalence among women aged 15+ decreased from a median of 35% [Uncertainty Range (UR): 26-42%] in 2021 to 25% [19-34%] in 2071. The proportion of cervical cancer cases that were women living with HIV declined from 73% [63-86%] to 58% [47-74%], but incidence remained 4.3-fold [3.3-5.7] that of women without HIV. ART scale-up reduced HIV prevalence in 2071, but increased the incidence rate ratio to 5.2 [3.7-7.3]. Disparities remained after expanding cancer interventions for all women (incidence rate ratio: 4.8 [3.6-7.6]), while additional catch-up HPV vaccination and screening for women living with HIV decreased the incidence rate ratio to 2.7 [1.9-3.4] in 2071. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored cervical cancer interventions for women living with HIV can counteract rising cancer incidence incurred by extended life expectancy on ART and reduce disparate cancer burden.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/complications , Adult , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Incidence , Prevalence , Adolescent , Young Adult , South Africa/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Early Detection of Cancer , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control
14.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1361509, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38756889

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Gynecologists and pediatricians have an essential duty to prevent cervical cancer. In this study, we compared the compliance of gynecologists (n = 22) and pediatricians (n = 49) with nurse/midwife (n = 66) and non-medical moms (n = 120) with regards to cervical cancer precautions. Methods: A questionnaire was used to gather data on their demographics, personal vaccination and screening practices, children's immunization status, and awareness of cervical cancer prevention. Results: The findings demonstrated that gynecologists and pediatricians were better than others at understanding the risk factors and prevention of cervical cancer. It was noted that compared to other groups, physician mothers and their offspring had higher vaccination rates (n = 13, 18.3%; n = 10, 29.4%, respectively). Medical professionals typically provided thorough and accurate answers to informational questions. More frequent Pap smear tests were performed by gynecologists. It was noted that mothers who worked as pediatricians and nurses/midwives neglected their own screening needs. Discussion: This questionnaire survey sought to ascertain Istanbul's health professionals' present opinions regarding HPV vaccination. Healthcare professionals should be the first to receive information on HPV vaccination and cervical cancer incidence reduction. The public could then readily use them as an example.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mothers , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Pediatricians , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Turkey , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Mothers/statistics & numerical data , Mothers/psychology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Pediatricians/statistics & numerical data , Pediatricians/psychology , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Nurses/psychology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Gynecology/statistics & numerical data , Male , Gynecologists
15.
BMJ ; 385: e077341, 2024 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749552

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To replicate previous analyses on the effectiveness of the English human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme on incidence of cervical cancer and grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3) using 12 additional months of follow-up, and to investigate effectiveness across levels of socioeconomic deprivation. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 20-64 years resident in England between January 2006 and June 2020 including 29 968 with a diagnosis of cervical cancer and 335 228 with a diagnosis of CIN3. In England, HPV vaccination was introduced nationally in 2008 and was offered routinely to girls aged 12-13 years, with catch-up campaigns during 2008-10 targeting older teenagers aged <19 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of invasive cervical cancer and CIN3. RESULTS: In England, 29 968 women aged 20-64 years received a diagnosis of cervical cancer and 335 228 a diagnosis of CIN3 between 1 January 2006 and 30 June 2020. In the birth cohort of women offered vaccination routinely at age 12-13 years, adjusted age standardised incidence rates of cervical cancer and CIN3 in the additional 12 months of follow-up (1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020) were, respectively, 83.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 63.8% to 92.8%) and 94.3% (92.6% to 95.7%) lower than in the reference cohort of women who were never offered HPV vaccination. By mid-2020, HPV vaccination had prevented an estimated 687 (95% CI 556 to 819) cervical cancers and 23 192 (22 163 to 24 220) CIN3s. The highest rates remained among women living in the most deprived areas, but the HPV vaccination programme had a large effect in all five levels of deprivation. In women offered catch-up vaccination, CIN3 rates decreased more in those from the least deprived areas than from the most deprived areas (reductions of 40.6% v 29.6% and 72.8% v 67.7% for women offered vaccination at age 16-18 and 14-16, respectively). The strong downward gradient in cervical cancer incidence from high to low deprivation in the reference unvaccinated group was no longer present among those offered the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: The high effectiveness of the national HPV vaccination programme previously seen in England continued during the additional 12 months of follow-up. HPV vaccination was associated with a substantially reduced incidence of cervical cancer and CIN3 across all five deprivation groups, especially in women offered routine vaccination.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , England/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Incidence , Adult , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Immunization Programs , Adolescent , Socioeconomic Factors
16.
Prev Med ; 183: 107982, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701952

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The fight against cervical cancer requires effective screening together with optimal and on-time treatment along the care continuum. We examined the impact of cervical cancer testing and treatment guidelines on testing practices, and follow-up adherence to guidelines. METHODS: Data from Estonian electronic health records and healthcare provision claims for 50,702 women was used. The annual rates of PAP tests, HPV tests and colposcopies during two guideline periods (2nd version 2012-2014 vs 3rd version 2016-2019) were compared. To assess the adherence to guidelines, the subjects were classified as adherent, over- or undertested based on the timing of the appropriate follow-up test. RESULTS: The number of PAP tests decreased and HPV tests increased during the 3rd guideline period (p < 0.01). During the 3rd guideline period, among 21-29-year-old women, the adherence to guidelines ranged from 38.7% (44.4…50.1) for ASC-US to 73.4% (62.6…84.3) for HSIL and among 30-59-year-old from 49.0% (45.9…52.2) for ASC-US to 65.7% (58.8…72.7) for ASCH. The highest rate of undertested women was for ASC-US (21-29y: 25.7%; 30-59y: 21.9%). The rates of over-tested women remained below 12% for all cervical pathologies observed. There were 55.2% (95% CI 49.7…60.8) of 21-24-year-olds and 57.1% (95% CI 53.6…60.6) of 25-29-year-old women who received HPV test not adherent to guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted some shortcomings in guideline adherence, especially among women under 30. The insights gained from this study help to improve the quality of care and, thus, reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Electronic Health Records , Guideline Adherence , Papanicolaou Test , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Vaginal Smears , Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Middle Aged , Vaginal Smears/statistics & numerical data , Estonia , Colposcopy , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Mass Screening
17.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2347018, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708779

ABSTRACT

HPV vaccination coverage remains far below the national target of 80% among US adolescents, particularly in rural areas, which have vaccine uptake rates that are 10% points lower than non-rural areas on average. Primary care professionals (PCPs) can increase coverage by using presumptive recommendations to introduce HPV vaccination in a way that assumes parents want to vaccinate. Through semi-structured interviews, we explored PCPs' experiences and perceptions of using presumptive recommendations in rural- and non-rural-serving primary care clinics in North Carolina. Thematic analysis revealed that most PCPs in rural and non-rural contexts used presumptive recommendations and felt the strategy was an effective and concise way to introduce the topic of HPV vaccination to parents. At the same time, some PCPs raised concerns about presumptive recommendations potentially straining relationships with certain parents, including those who had previously declined HPV vaccine or who distrust medical authority due to their past experiences with the healthcare system. PCPs dealt with these challenges by using a more open-ended approach when introducing HPV vaccination to parents. In conclusion, our findings suggest that PCPs in both rural and non-rural settings see value in using presumptive recommendations to introduce HPV vaccination, but to adequately address concerns and ensure increased HPV vaccine uptake, PCPs can use simple and culturally sensitive language to ensure fully informed consent and to maintain parental trust. And to further strengthen HPV vaccine discussions, PCPs can utilize other effective HPV communication techniques, like the Announcement Approach, in discussing HPV vaccinations with hesitant parents.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Parents , Primary Health Care , Qualitative Research , Rural Population , Vaccination , Humans , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Female , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Male , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/psychology , Adolescent , Parents/psychology , North Carolina , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Middle Aged , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/psychology , Interviews as Topic
18.
J Med Econ ; 27(sup2): 9-19, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721643

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infections are responsible for approximately 13% of cancer cases worldwide and many of these infections can be prevented by vaccination. Human papillomavirus (HPV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) are among the most common infections that cause cancer deaths globally, despite effective prophylactic vaccines being available. This analysis aims to estimate the global burden and economic impact of vaccine-preventable cancer mortality across World Health Organization (WHO) regions. METHODS: The number of deaths and years of life lost (YLL) due to five different vaccine-preventable cancer forms (oral cavity, liver, laryngeal, cervical, and oropharyngeal cancer) in each of the WHO regions (African, Eastern Mediterranean, European, the Americas, South-East Asia Pacific, and Western Pacific) were obtained from the Institute for Health Metrics Evaluation global burden of disease dataset. Vaccine-preventable mortality was estimated considering the fraction attributable to infection, to estimate the number of deaths and YLL potentially preventable through vaccination. Data from the World Bank on GDP per capita were used to estimate the value of YLL (VYLL). The robustness of these results was explored with sensitivity analysis. Given that several Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) vaccines are in development, but not yet available, the impact of a potential vaccine for EBV was evaluated in a scenario analysis. RESULTS: In 2019, there were 465,740 potentially vaccine-preventable cancer deaths and 14,171,397 YLL across all WHO regions. The estimated economic impact due to this mortality was $106.3 billion globally. The sensitivity analysis calculated a range of 403,025-582,773 deaths and a range in productivity cost of $78.8-129.0 billion. In the scenario analysis EBV-related cancer mortality increased the global burden by 159,723 deaths and $32.4 billion. CONCLUSION: Overall, the findings from this analysis illustrate the high economic impact of premature cancer mortality that could be potentially preventable by vaccination which may assist decision-makers in allocating limited resources among competing priorities. Improved implementation and increased vaccination coverage of HPV and HBV should be prioritized to decrease this burden.


Subject(s)
Global Health , Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/economics , Female , Male , Global Burden of Disease , Cost of Illness , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases/prevention & control , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases/economics , Middle Aged , Adult , Models, Econometric , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
19.
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol ; 73(1): 37-50, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697839

ABSTRACT

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted viral infection worldwide, which may result in the development in benign lesions or malignant tumors. The prevalence of HPV infection is twice as high in pregnancy as in non-pregnant women. Additionally, there is a risk of vertical transmission of HPV from mother to fetus during pregnancy or childbirth. Various studies have reported an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in HPV-positive women, including miscarriage, preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes, preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and fetal death. HPV vaccination is not currently recommended during pregnancy. On the other hand, there is no evidence linking HPV vaccination during pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes and termination of pregnancy is not justified in this case.


Subject(s)
Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Papillomavirus Infections , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Papillomavirus Infections/transmission , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Pregnancy Outcome , Papillomavirus Vaccines
20.
Am J Mens Health ; 18(3): 15579883241252524, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767052

ABSTRACT

Awareness of risk for oropharyngeal cancer from oral human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is low among men in the United States. This pilot study tested messages communicating oral HPV and oropharyngeal cancer risk among a sample of U.S. young adult men (aged 18-26). Six oral HPV and cancer risk messages were tested in an online survey. Participants (N = 68) were randomly assigned to one of two message sets, each containing three unique text-based messages. Participants evaluated messages separately based on various measures (e.g., perceived message effectiveness [PME], novelty). One-way repeated measures ANOVAs were used to assess evaluation differences within message sets. Participants provided open-ended feedback about each message, which were synthesized into overarching themes. Participants were receptive to the risk messages, rating them high on PME (mean range = 3.72-4.25 out of 5) and other measures. Analyses identified three high-performing messages. For example, participants rated a message about HPV-linked oropharyngeal cancer risk rates in men versus women higher on attention and novelty than two other messages in the same set (both ps < .05). Participants were shown three messages (instead of all six) in each message set to minimize survey fatigue. Common themes from open-ended feedback were that participants liked the short-form structure of the messages and that the messages used gender-tailored language. In conclusion, oral HPV and oropharyngeal cancer risk messages may be useful for increasing risk awareness among men in the U.S. Further work should test such messages in rigorous experimental contexts to assess their efficacy in modifying other health outcomes, such as HPV vaccination behaviors.


Subject(s)
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Papillomavirus Infections , Humans , Male , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Pilot Projects , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Adult , United States , Young Adult , Adolescent , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Risk Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...