Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 85
Filter
1.
Med Leg J ; 88(3): 139-143, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32427064

ABSTRACT

Child pornography involves the realisation of deviant fantasies with very specific characteristics with regard to its content and use and therefore the legal action needed to deal with it. The internet has facilitated its dissemination and access and complicates the issue but we need to be able to identify and track people who use illegal pornography. This paper is based on a review of the literature and presents some criminological characteristics of child pornography on the internet.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse, Sexual/legislation & jurisprudence , Erotica/legislation & jurisprudence , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Child , Child, Preschool , Criminal Law/trends , Erotica/psychology , Humans , Paraphilic Disorders/psychology
2.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol ; 16: 379-399, 2020 05 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32023092

ABSTRACT

There is no accepted definition of the term paraphilia despite its being listed as an essential feature of a class of mental disorders known as the paraphilic disorders. The origin of the term, history of its inclusion as a diagnosis, and logical flaws inherent in the various definitions are discussed in this review. We examine the basis for pathologizing individuals with paraphilias, consider what paraphilias can tell us about how humans develop their sexual interests, and question the usefulness of dividing sexual interests into paraphilias and normophilias. The construct of the paraphilias appears to be poorly conceived and has outlived its usefulness.


Subject(s)
Paraphilic Disorders , Sexual Behavior , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Paraphilic Disorders/diagnosis , Paraphilic Disorders/history , Paraphilic Disorders/physiopathology , Sexual Behavior/physiology
3.
J Sex Med ; 16(11): 1814-1819, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31551191

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization (WHO) Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse appointed a Working Group on Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health in order to revise and propose changes to ICD-10 categories. AIM: Analyze ethical and legal implications in Brazil of the proposed ICD-11 diagnostic criteria for paraphilic disorders. METHODS: A forensic working group of Brazilian experts in collaboration with representatives of WHO reviewed the proposed modifications to the classification of Disorders of Sexual Preference in ICD-10 (F65), which is recommended to be replaced by Paraphilic Disorders in ICD-11. Proposals were reviewed through a medicolegal lens, using a legal and policy analysis guide put forth by WHO. The premise of this review was to understand that, although the ICD classification is intended to provide a basis for clinical and statistical health interventions, medical diagnostics may also be entangled in the complex legal, normative, and political environment of various countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The most important proposed change to this section is to limit the concept of paraphilic disorders primarily to patterns of sexual arousal involving a focus on others who are unwilling or unable to consent, but this change has not affected the ethical and legal aspects of psychiatric functioning in the Brazil. RESULTS: Because Brazilian criminal law is directed toward criminal behavior and not to specific psychiatric diagnoses, the changes proposed for ICD-11 are not expected to create obstacles to health services or to modify criminal sentencing. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Although ICD-11 has a number of changes in its content, there are no significant clinical implications in the Brazilian context, but a better clarity of conceptual definitions and diagnostic criteria. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: The study is conducted with people from different Brazilian states, which is important for a comprehensive view. On the other hand, considering that it is a very heterogeneous country, there is the limitation that an even wider scope of the study is not possible. CONCLUSION: In the Brazilian context, the new guidelines for paraphilic disorders contribute to clinical utility and are not expected to create difficulties related to the legal, social, and economic consequences of sexual offenses in the country. Abdalla-Filho E, de Jesus Mari J, Diehl A, et al. Forensic Implications of the New Classification of ICD-11 Paraphilic Disorders in Brazil. J Sex Med 2019; 16:1814-1819.


Subject(s)
International Classification of Diseases , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Sex Offenses/legislation & jurisprudence , Sexual Behavior/classification , Brazil , Criminals , Humans , Paraphilic Disorders/psychology , Sexual Behavior/psychology
4.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law ; 47(3): 335-346, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31097526

ABSTRACT

Bestiality is an uncomfortable topic about which there is limited scientific literature. Prevalence research has focused on self-reported acts, and no research has established the actual frequency and nature of deliberate sex acts with animals. This quantitative, descriptive study examined 456 arrests for bestiality-related incidents in the United States from 1975 to 2015 to explore patterns of offending, offender characteristics, and how cases were adjudicated. The results suggest that animal sex offending may be linked to other criminal behavior, and involves a spectrum of sexual acts, including coercive, violent, and non-violent penetration; solicitation for sex with animals; and deviant behavior including torture and necrophilia. Findings of concern were that 31.6% of animal sex offenders also sexually offended against children and adults; 52.9% had a prior or subsequent criminal record involving human sexual abuse, animal abuse, interpersonal violence, substances, or property offenses; and only 39.1% of arrests involving the direct sexual abuse of animals resulted in prosecution. The broad range of sexual assault patterns and varied legal outcomes suggest that bestiality is more pervasive and more serious than previously thought and point to a need for additional research to aid in detection, intervention, sentencing, treatment, and supervision methods.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Criminal Behavior/classification , Criminal Law/trends , Criminals/classification , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Sex Offenses/legislation & jurisprudence , Sex Offenses/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States , Young Adult
5.
Psychiatr Pol ; 53(5): 1103-1112, 2019 Oct 30.
Article in English, Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31955188

ABSTRACT

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published in 2013 has proved to be particularly interesting in the field of sexuality. It introduced a number of significant changes in the definition of sexual norms, among them a widely discussed distinction between paraphilias and paraphilic disorders. The key criterion separating the abnormal sexual interests from the disordered ones is clinically significant distress resulting directly from sexual behavior and/or the risk of suffering or harm to another person as a result of one's sexual behavior. In the case of masochism - which addresses the phenomenon of suffering quite particularly - this distinction is troublesome. Using the example of autoerotic asphyxia - a behavior from the masochism spectrum - the authors critically examine the proposed DSM-5 method of defining the standards of sexual behavior. Interesting in this regard has been a comparison between autoerotic asphyxia and free diving - a nonsexual activity which, although also associated with possible loss of life by reduction of oxygen, has not been pathologized.


Subject(s)
Asphyxia/classification , Hypoxia, Brain/classification , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Sexual Behavior/classification , Asphyxia/psychology , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Humans , Hypoxia, Brain/psychology , Male , Paraphilic Disorders/psychology
6.
Arch Sex Behav ; 47(8): 2265-2276, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29926261

ABSTRACT

Criteria for hypersexual disorder (HD) were proposed for consideration in the DSM-5 but ultimately excluded for a variety of reasons. Regardless, research continues to investigate hypersexual behavior (HB). The Hypersexual Behavior Inventory (HBI) is one of the most robust scales assessing HB, but further examination is needed to explore its psychometric properties among different groups. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the generalizability of the HBI in a large, diverse, non-clinical sample (N = 18,034 participants; females = 6132; 34.0%; Mage = 33.6 years, SDage = 11.1) across both gender and sexual orientation. Measurement invariance testing was carried out to ensure gender- and sexual orientation-based comparisons were meaningful. Results demonstrated when both gender and sexual orientation were considered (i.e., heterosexual males vs. LGBTQ males vs. heterosexual females vs. LGBTQ females), LGBTQ males had significantly higher latent means on the HBI factors. Results also demonstrated LGBTQ males had the highest scores on other possible indicators of hypersexuality (e.g., frequency of masturbation, number of sexual partners, or frequency of pornography viewing). These findings suggest LGBTQ males may be a group most at risk of engaging in hypersexual behavior, and LGBTQ females are at a higher risk of engaging in hypersexual activities due to coping problems. Given the large-scale nature of the study, the findings contribute to the currently growing body of the literature on hypersexuality.


Subject(s)
Compulsive Behavior , Paraphilic Disorders/diagnosis , Sexual Behavior , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Erotica , Female , Gender Identity , Humans , Male , Masturbation , Middle Aged , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Psychometrics , Sexual Partners
7.
Arch Sex Behav ; 46(5): 1529-1545, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28210933

ABSTRACT

The World Health Organization is currently developing the 11th revision of the International Classifications of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11), with approval of the ICD-11 by the World Health Assembly anticipated in 2018. The Working Group on the Classification of Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health (WGSDSH) was created and charged with reviewing and making recommendations for categories related to sexuality that are contained in the chapter of Mental and Behavioural Disorders in ICD-10 (World Health Organization 1992a). Among these categories was the ICD-10 grouping F65, Disorders of sexual preference, which describes conditions now widely referred to as Paraphilic Disorders. This article reviews the evidence base, rationale, and recommendations for the proposed revisions in this area for ICD-11 and compares them with DSM-5. The WGSDSH recommended that the grouping, Disorders of sexual preference, be renamed to Paraphilic Disorders and be limited to disorders that involve sexual arousal patterns that focus on non-consenting others or are associated with substantial distress or direct risk of injury or death. Consistent with this framework, the WGSDSH also recommended that the ICD-10 categories of Fetishism, Fetishistic Transvestism, and Sadomasochism be removed from the classification and new categories of Coercive Sexual Sadism Disorder, Frotteuristic Disorder, Other Paraphilic Disorder Involving Non-Consenting Individuals, and Other Paraphilic Disorder Involving Solitary Behaviour or Consenting Individuals be added. The WGSDSH's proposals for Paraphilic Disorders in ICD-11 are based on the WHO's role as a global public health agency and the ICD's function as a public health reporting tool.


Subject(s)
International Classification of Diseases , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Sexual Behavior/classification , Fetishism, Psychiatric/classification , Humans , Masochism/classification , Sexuality , Transvestism/classification
8.
Sex Med Rev ; 5(2): 146-162, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28041854

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite the rejection of hypersexual disorder (HD) as a new diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), clinical and research interest in HD continues. AIM: To systematically review the existing scientific literature on the conceptualization and assessment of HD and out-of-control sexual behavior. METHODS: Studies were identified from PsychInfo, PubMed, JSTOR, Google Scholar, and Scholar's Portal using an exhaustive list of key terms. Of 299 total articles identified and screened, 252 were excluded, and 47 are included in this review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To review two categories of articles: HD conceptualization and HD psychometric assessment. RESULTS: First, results of the review of theoretical conceptualizations of HD reflected a large proportion of the peer-reviewed literature devoted to discussing conceptualizations of HD without reaching consensus. Second, results of the review of HD psychometric assessments were analyzed using Hunsley and Mash's (2008) criteria to evaluate psychometric adequacy of evidence-based assessment measurements. The six most researched measurements of HD were evaluated, including the Hypersexual Disorder Screening Inventory, the Hypersexual Behavior Inventory, the Sexual Compulsivity Scale, the Sexual Addiction Screening Test, the Sexual Addiction Screening Test-Revised, and the Compulsive Sexual Behavior Inventory. Psychometric properties of the scales are reviewed, evaluated, and discussed. CONCLUSION: The Hypersexual Disorder Screening Inventory, the measurement proposed for the clinical screening of HD by the DSM-5 workgroup, currently has the strongest psychometric support. Future research and clinical directions are discussed in light of findings after the literature review and synthesis. Montgomery-Graham S. Conceptualization and Assessment of Hypersexual Disorder: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Sex Med Rev 2017;5:146-162.


Subject(s)
Compulsive Behavior , Paraphilic Disorders , Sexual Behavior , Compulsive Behavior/classification , Humans , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Paraphilic Disorders/psychology
9.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol ; 12: 383-406, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26772210

ABSTRACT

This review summarizes and critically examines the changes in how the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) characterizes paraphilias. Attention is paid to the diagnostic options that were included in DSM-5, the decision not to include criterion sets for two additional disorders (paraphilic coercive disorder and hypersexual behavior disorder), and the further decision not to modify the diagnosis of pedophilic to pedohebephilic disorder. The three most significant changes are (a) the move to distinguish paraphilias from paraphilic disorders (allowing unusual sexual interests to be studied by researchers but only regarded as disorders when they cause distress or dysfunction), (b) introducing criteria describing paraphilic disorders as being in remission (when they no longer cause distress or dysfunction), and (c) clarifying the relationship between behavior and paraphilias. Concerns are noted about the forensic use of diagnoses and the lack of funding for field trials in this revision of the DSM. Suggestions are given for future directions in order to further research efficacy and clinical diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Paraphilic Disorders/diagnosis , Humans , Paraphilic Disorders/classification
10.
J Sex Res ; 53(2): 224-38, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26169176

ABSTRACT

The recent attempt to introduce hypersexual disorder into the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), has increased empirical scrutiny of the construct. Consensus on its definition and underlying structure remains elusive. Whereas some conceptualizations favor a categorical latent structure, others speculate that hypersexual behavior is dimensional. Research on the latent structure of hypersexual behavior, however, has been sparse. This is unfortunate, because determination of the latent structure can contribute to more accurate assessment, diagnosis, and understanding of etiological process. To date the only study on hypersexuality's latent structure found consistent evidence of a dimensional structure for males but less clear results for females. In the present study the Multidimensional Inventory of Development, Sex, and Aggression (MIDSA), a self-report, contingency-based inventory, was administered to 1,146 college students. Four indices of hypersexual behavior and six indices of sexual compulsivity were analyzed, using three taxometric methods (mean above minus below a cut [MAMBAC], maximum covariance [MAXCOV], and latent mode factor analysis [L-Mode]). Evidence supported a dimensional latent structure for hypersexuality in male and female samples. Future assessments of hypersexuality must focus on adequate reliability and discriminant validity across the continuum of sexual behavior rather than on attempts to differentiate between arbitrarily developed diagnostic categorizations.


Subject(s)
Paraphilic Disorders/psychology , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Students/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Sexual Behavior/classification , Universities , Young Adult
11.
Arch Sex Behav ; 44(5): 1165-76, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26054486

ABSTRACT

In the DSM-5, there has been a change in the diagnosis for transpeople of all ages from Gender Identity Disorder (GID) to Gender Dysphoria (GD), in part to better indicate the distress that transpeople may experience when their gender identity feels incongruent. The Workgroup for Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders, chaired by Kenneth J. Zucker, was employed by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) to update the DSM-5's GID diagnosis reflecting contemporary scientific knowledge. Additionally, in a pre-publication report to the APA, members of the Workgroup suggested that they would also be concerned with the destigmatization of transpeople while preserving a diagnosis that medical insurance companies would accept for issuing payments for transitioning treatments (Drescher, 2013). The aims of this article are, firstly, to question whether changing the diagnosis lessens the stigmatization of transpeople. I will suggest that the semantic change from GID to GD marks "inverted" gendered expressions as pathological and, thus, continues to stigmatize transpeople. Secondly, the article explores the development of the GD diagnosis, and illustrates how the scientific data this were founded on are contentious. The article then demonstrates how the trans anti-pathologization movement has challenged the perceived pathologizing effects of the DSM-5 classification of GD. The article examines a selection of Western transgender community advocates' websites, forums, and blogs. From these sources, the article then explores the different narratives of transpeople and political groups who offer details of their praxis, and evidences how the trans anti-pathologization advocates use the available science and human rights discourses to contest the role of psychiatry in the treatment of transpeople.


Subject(s)
Gender Dysphoria/classification , Gender Identity , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Transgender Persons/classification , Transsexualism , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Gender Dysphoria/chemically induced , Humans , Male , Terminology as Topic
12.
Arch Sex Behav ; 44(5): 1139-45, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25894646

ABSTRACT

The move from "paraphilias" to "paraphilic disorders," where only the latter constitute mental disorders, has been hailed as a major change to the conception of non-normative sexualities in DSM-5. However, this is a claim that has been criticized by numerous activists and doctors working for removal of all diagnoses of so-called sexual disorders from the APA's manual. This article, written from a critical humanities, queer theory-inflected perspective, examines the historical and ideological grounds underlying the inclusion of the newly branded "paraphilic disorders" in DSM-5. It argues that the diagnosis does nothing to overturn the conservative and utilitarian view of sexuality as genitally oriented and for reproduction that has colored sexological and psychiatric history. It suggests that despite homosexuality no longer being classed as a disorder, an implicit heteronormativity continues to define psychiatric perceptions of sexuality. In sum, this article proposes that (1) the production of the field of psychiatric knowledge concerning "perversion"/"sexual deviation"/"paraphilia"/"paraphilic disorder" is more ideological than properly scientific; (2) the "normophilic" bias of the DSM is a bias in favor of heteronormativity and reproduction; and (3) some sexual practices are valued above others, regardless of claims that the presence of a paraphilic practice itself is no longer a criterion for a diagnosis of mental disorder.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Paraphilic Disorders/diagnosis , Terminology as Topic , Forensic Psychiatry , Homosexuality , Humans , Pedophilia/classification , Pedophilia/diagnosis
14.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law ; 42(2): 191-201, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24986346

ABSTRACT

Given that paraphilic disorders are diagnosed largely in forensic settings, virtually every significant change in the criteria has forensic implications. Several controversial changes were considered during the DSM-5 revision process, but most were ultimately not included in the published text. However, any changes that make it easier to assign a paraphilic disorder diagnosis to an individual must be considered with caution. Criterion A for paraphilic disorders has been changed to reduce one potential risk that could result in false-positive diagnoses (i.e., allowing evaluators to diagnose a paraphilic disorder based entirely on the presence of sexual acts). In contrast, many of the other changes including some of those in the text, make it easier to diagnose a specific paraphilia and thus increase the risk of false-positive diagnoses. Since the assignment of a paraphilic disorder diagnosis can result in adverse legal consequences, the actual forensic impact of the changes will depend on how the legal system incorporates these new definitions into statutes and case law.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Paraphilic Disorders/diagnosis , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Forensic Psychiatry , Humans
15.
Nervenarzt ; 85(3): 304-11, 2014 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24603948

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the severity of paraphilic disorders is an important aspect of psychiatric court reports for assessing criminal responsibility and placement in a forensic psychiatric hospital according to the German penal code (§§ 20, 21, 63 StGB). The minimum requirements for appraisal of criminal responsibility published by an interdisciplinary working group under the guidance of the German Federal Court of Justice define the standards for this procedure. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: This paper presents a research concept that aims to assess the severity of paraphilic disorders by using items of standardized prognostic instruments. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In addition to a formal diagnosis according to the international classification of diseases (ICD) and the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental diseases (DSM) criteria, the items "deviant sexual interests" and "sexual preoccupations" from the prognosis instrument Stable 2007 are used to assess the severity of paraphilic disorders. Other criteria, such as "relationship deficits" are used to support the appraisal of the severity of the disorder. The items "sexual preoccupation", "emotional collapse" and "collapse of social support" from the prognosis instrument Acute 2007 are used to assess the capacity for self-control. In a next step the validity and reliability of this concept will be tested.


Subject(s)
Criminals/legislation & jurisprudence , Criminals/psychology , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Forensic Psychiatry/methods , Liability, Legal , Paraphilic Disorders/diagnosis , Paraphilic Disorders/psychology , Germany , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Prognosis , Severity of Illness Index , Social Responsibility
16.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 56(3): 196-200, 2014.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24643831

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In DSM-IV-TR, the subject of 'sexual and gender identity disorders' was dealt with in one chapter; in DSM-5, however, the subject is divided into three chapters, namely sexual dysfunctions , gender dysphoria, and paraphilic disorders. AIM: To discuss the above-mentioned changes. METHOD: The one-chapter version in DSM-IV is compared with the three-chapter contribution in DSM-5 and the differing criteria are tested for their clinical utility. RESULTS: There are minor changes in the chapter 'sexual dysfunctions'. The content of the chapters on 'gender dysphoria' and 'paraphilic disorders' differs substantially from the content of the sections on these subjects in DSM-IV. In the section on gender dysphoria the term 'sex' has been replaced by 'gender' and the term 'identity disorder' has been dropped. With regard to paraphilias, a distinction is now made between a paraphilia and a paraphilic disorder. The DSM-5 makes a new distinction between pathology (paraphilic disorder) on the one hand and other unusual or unconventional non-pathological sexual behavior on the other hand. In the DSM-5 the highly relevant clinical concept 'hypersexuality' has still not been incorporated as a separate category. CONCLUSION: In the DSM-5 many parts of the chapters on sexual disorders have been substantially revised.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Paraphilic Disorders/diagnosis , Sexual and Gender Disorders/diagnosis , Female , Gender Identity , Humans , Male , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Sexual and Gender Disorders/classification
17.
Prog Urol ; 23(9): 793-803, 2013 Jul.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23830274

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To know the new concept of paraphilias, their clinical presentation and their link with a personality disorder as perversion, the French legislation concerning them and the different therapeutic options. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Review of guidelines published on this subject in the Medline database and a reflexion from our own clinical experience, especially in the judicial expertise. RESULTS: Deviant sexual behavior is, in current classifications, known as paraphilia. This clinical entity corresponds to any sexual behavior considered "abnormal" compared with sexual acts in the society where the person lives. It means precisely, firstly, suffering caused by this disorder or deterioration of social, professional, or family life. Paraphilia such as pedophilia have strict age limits. The victim must be aged below 16 years, with an age difference of at least 5 years with the author of the act. Sexual acts which are illegal are crimes or offences according to the degree, and are sanctioned by the law. In ordinary terms, they are known as perverts, committing perversions. This concept is different from that of paraphilia, a pervert can have, or not have, paraphiliac behavior. In order to diagnose a personality disorder such as perversion, all the criteria must be included: narcissism, use of a person as an object for pleasure, with, primarily, mechanisms of denial and a split personality which removes any feeling of guilt from the perpetrator. CONCLUSION: Medical treatment of paraphilia alone is not satisfactory for the denial mechanism is such that only the sex drive is affected with a high risk of recurrence. Only psychotherapy can modify the pathological element of a perverted personality.


Subject(s)
Paraphilic Disorders , Humans , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Paraphilic Disorders/diagnosis , Paraphilic Disorders/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Sexual Behavior , Urology
19.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 200(6): 492-4, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22652613

ABSTRACT

As mass media and the advertising industry sexualize children at earlier ages, DSM-5 is considering a proposal for a new mental disorder involving sexual attraction to adolescents. Despite the fact that most men are sexually aroused by pubescent teens, some clinicians and researchers believe they have identified a new subgroup of chronically impaired men who are compulsively drawn to older children. We discuss the proposal and conclude that it is insufficiently documented and that with such potentially serious medicolegal consequences, inclusion in the new manual is not advised. Clinically, there are insufficient data showing the construct to be reliable and valid. Forensically, a new diagnosis of hebephilia is likely to be used to justify indefinite civil commitment and other onerous punishments.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders/classification , Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders/diagnosis , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Paraphilic Disorders/diagnosis , Pedophilia/classification , Pedophilia/diagnosis , Sex Offenses/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Commitment of Mentally Ill/legislation & jurisprudence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic Errors , Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Paraphilic Disorders/epidemiology , Paraphilic Disorders/psychology , Pedophilia/epidemiology , Pedophilia/psychology , Reproducibility of Results , United States
20.
Arch Sex Behav ; 41(1): 237-47, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22282324

ABSTRACT

Whether homosexuality should be described as one among many paraphilic sexual interests or an altogether different dimension of sexual interest has long been discussed in terms of its political and social implications. The present article examined the question instead by comparing the major correlates and other features of homosexuality and of the paraphilias, including prevalence, sex ratio, onset and course, fraternal birth order, physical height, handedness, IQ and cognitive neuropsychological profile, and neuroanatomy. Although those literatures remain underdeveloped, the existing findings thus far suggest that homosexuality has a pattern of correlates largely, but not entirely, distinct from that identified among the paraphilias. At least, if homosexuality were deemed a paraphilia, it would be relatively unique among them, taxonometrically speaking.


Subject(s)
Homosexuality/classification , Paraphilic Disorders/classification , Sexual Behavior/classification , Birth Order , Female , Humans , Male , Paraphilic Disorders/psychology , Sex Ratio , Sexual Behavior/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...