Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 16.111
Filter
2.
Niger Postgrad Med J ; 31(2): 163-169, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38826020

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Interprofessional collaboration in healthcare is important to optimise healthcare delivery. However, relatively few studies have been conducted on the topic in Nigeria, especially in the North. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the levels of interprofessional collaboration, enablers and barriers amongst healthcare workers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected using a five-domain modified Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale questionnaire, with a Likert scale of 1-5. The ideal mean score was ≤2 for the barriers domain and ≥4 for the other domains. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-six participants responded to the questionnaire. Male and female respondents were 131 (49.2%) each. Half of the respondents were 31 to 40 years old. One hundred and thirty-six (51.1%) of the respondents were nurses, and 48 (18.0%) were doctors. The modal working experience was 6-11 years (41.4%), and 117 (44.0%) respondents had at least a bachelor's degree. The mean scores for the domains were 4.1032 for partnership, 3.2383 for cooperation, 3.6309 for coordination, 4.2844 for enablers and 3.7902 for barriers. CONCLUSION: There was adequate level of partnership and enablers amongst the healthcare workers but insufficient cooperation and coordination and high level of barriers. Staff training on cooperation, coordination and identified barriers is necessary to improve interprofessional collaboration in the hospital.


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Interprofessional Relations , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Nigeria , Male , Female , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , Middle Aged , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Young Adult
4.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 567, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698483

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a growing recognition of multidisciplinary practices as the most rational approach to providing better and more efficient healthcare services. Pharmacists are increasingly integrated into primary care teams, but there is no universal approach to implementing pharmacist services across healthcare settings. In Norway, most pharmacists work in pharmacies, with very few employed outside this traditional setting. The home care workforce is primarily made up of nurses, assistant nurses, and healthcare assistants. General practitioners (GPs) are not based in the same location as home care staff. This study utilized the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to conduct a process evaluation of the integration of pharmacists in a Norwegian home care setting. Our aim was to identify barriers and facilitators to optimal utilization of pharmacist services within a multidisciplinary team. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews (n = 9) were conducted with home care unit leaders, ward managers, registered nurses, and pharmacists in Norway, in November 2022-February 2023. Constructs from the NPT were applied to qualitative data. RESULTS: Findings from this study pertain to the four constructs of the NPT. Healthcare professionals struggled to conceptualize the pharmacists' competencies and there were no collectively agreed-upon objectives of the intervention. Consequently, some participants questioned the necessity of pharmacist integration. Further, participants reported conflicting preferences regarding how to best utilize medication-optimizing services in everyday work. A lack of stakeholder empowerment was reported across all participants. Moreover, home care unit leaders and managers reported being uninformed of their roles and responsibilities related to the implementation process. However, the presence of pharmacists and their services were well received in the setting. Moreover, participants reported that pharmacists' contributions positively impacted the multidisciplinary practice. CONCLUSION: Introducing new work methods into clinical practice is a complex task that demands expertise in implementation. Using the NTP model helped pinpoint factors that affect how pharmacists' skills are utilized in a home care setting. Insights from this study can inform the development of tailored implementation strategies to improve pharmacist integration in a multidisciplinary team.


Subject(s)
Home Care Services , Interviews as Topic , Patient Care Team , Pharmacists , Qualitative Research , Humans , Home Care Services/organization & administration , Norway , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Male , Female , Professional Role , Attitude of Health Personnel , Adult , Middle Aged
5.
J Nurs Educ ; 63(5): 304-311, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729140

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care reform promotes interprofessional patient-centric health care models associated with improved population health outcomes. Interprofessional education (IPE) programs are necessary to cultivate collaborative care, yet little evidence exists to support IPE pedagogy within nursing and other health science academia. METHOD: This quasiexperimental study examined differences in pre- and posttest Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) scores following an IPE intervention. The IPE intervention consisted of a video presentation and a debriefing session after a simulated interprofessional collaborative patient care conference that introduced baccalaureate nursing and health science students to the roles and responsibilities of clinicians in team-based primary care. Pre- and postintervention RIPLS scores were analyzed. RESULTS: Pre- and postintervention RIPLS scores increased across all subscales, with distinct variation between nursing and health science student subscales. CONCLUSION: This IPE intervention had positive effects on students' readiness for interprofessional learning. Additional research is warranted to support health science pedagogy. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(5):304-311.].


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Interprofessional Education , Interprofessional Relations , Students, Nursing , Humans , Interprofessional Education/organization & administration , Students, Nursing/psychology , Students, Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/organization & administration , Female , Male , Nursing Education Research , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Adult
6.
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb) ; 127(6): 469-480, 2024 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739196

ABSTRACT

The orthoplastic approach involves the collaboration of orthopedic/trauma surgeons, vascular surgeons and reconstructive microsurgeons. In cases of complex limb fractures, the aims are to optimize blood flow, restore bone stability, reconstruct soft tissue defects, and enhance function and sensitivity. The early administration of antibiotics and a timely, high-quality debridement after initial interdisciplinary assessment are carried out. This is followed by fracture stabilization and temporary wound coverage in order to plan the definitive interdisciplinary procedure. This includes definitive osteosynthesis and soft tissue reconstruction, using local tissue transfer if feasible, or free tissue transfer in cases of extensive trauma zones. The orthoplastic approach allows for faster definitive stabilization, fewer operations, shorter hospital stays, lower complication and revision rates, higher cost-effectiveness and improved long-term function.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Open , Patient Care Team , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Fractures, Open/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Soft Tissue Injuries/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Debridement
7.
Home Healthc Now ; 42(3): 179-183, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709584

ABSTRACT

Home healthcare agencies provide interdisciplinary care to millions of individuals annually. Care is typically led by registered nurses who often determine additional disciplines need to be included in the plan of care. We found that, although persons living with dementia represent about 30% of the home healthcare population, data from our home healthcare system showed that over a 1-year period with 36,443 home care episodes, only 29.6% had one or more social worker visits. Recognizing Alzheimer's disease-related dementia as a terminal condition and shifting toward a palliative care approach can be a challenge in home healthcare where care is focused on restorative care or rehabilitative goals with a primary focus on improvement in condition. The goal of this article is to present insights into nurse-led care coordination and teamwork and provide implications for practice.


Subject(s)
Home Care Services , Patient Care Team , Humans , Home Care Services/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Dementia/nursing , Male , Female , Aged , Home Health Nursing/organization & administration , Alzheimer Disease/nursing
8.
J Med Life ; 17(1): 50-56, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38737663

ABSTRACT

This study provides a conceptual exploration of an innovative telemedicine-enhanced team-based care (TETC) model, tailored to prenatal care, integrating a multidisciplinary team approach with advanced telemedicine technologies. The algorithm developed for TETC aims to optimize communication and coordination among healthcare professionals, including obstetricians, midwives, nutritionists, and mental health experts. This cohesive team structure ensures a comprehensive care plan encompassing all facets of maternal and fetal health. Leveraging telemedicine tools like video conferencing and digital health records, the model supports remote consultations and coordinated care, proving particularly advantageous during pandemics or in regions with limited healthcare access. Central to the TETC model is patient-centered care, focusing on personalized care plans attuned to the individual needs, health status, and socioeconomic backgrounds of pregnant women. This approach not only enhances accessibility and convenience by diminishing the necessity for physical consultations but also ensures continuity of care throughout pregnancy. This continuity is crucial for consistent health parameter tracking and early risk identification. The paper discusses the model's design, operational workflow, and ethical and legal considerations, providing implementation guidelines and potential applications. The TETC model, rooted in current technological capabilities and healthcare frameworks, underscores the need for close collaboration with healthcare professionals to adhere to medical standards and address real-world requirements effectively.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Patient Care Team , Prenatal Care , Telemedicine , Humans , Telemedicine/methods , Female , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/methods , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient-Centered Care
9.
Am J Manag Care ; 30(5): e165-e168, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748917

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Given the problematic fragmentation of care for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), a kidney care organization and an integrated health system within a large accountable care organization partnered to best utilize their individual capabilities to collaborate around their shared patients in a coordinated care approach. Ultimately, the goal of the program is to allow care teams to achieve the triple aim of improving the patient experience, improving clinical outcomes, and reducing the total cost of health care. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective examination of the first year of the Shared Patient Care Coordination (SPCC) program. METHODS: The analysis consisted of 2 parts. First, rates of hospitalizations and emergency department visits were compared between the SPCC patients and other patients of the integrated health system who had ESKD but did not participate in SPCC. Second, rates of clinical indicators-central venous catheter (CVC) use, home dialysis, advance care planning, and missed dialysis treatments-were benchmarked vs normative data taken by bootstrap sampling of the kidney care organization's patient population. RESULTS: Overall, dialysis patients participating in the SPCC program had a 15% lower rate of hospital admissions than those not participating ( P = .02). Additionally, the bootstrap analysis showed that by the second year, dialysis patients in the program had favorable rates (above the 95th percentile) of CVC use, dialysis treatment absenteeism, and completion of advance care plans. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced and structured communication between dialysis providers and patient care teams provides a unique opportunity to coordinate patient-centered care and improve patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Accountable Care Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Renal Dialysis , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration
10.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 607, 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724975

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary health care has a central role in dementia detection, diagnosis, and management, especially in low-resource rural areas. Care navigation is a strategy to improve integration and access to care, but little is known about how navigators can collaborate with rural primary care teams to support dementia care. In Saskatchewan, Canada, the RaDAR (Rural Dementia Action Research) team partnered with rural primary health care teams to implement interprofessional memory clinics that included an Alzheimer Society First Link Coordinator (FLC) in a navigator role. Study objectives were to examine FLC and clinic team member perspectives of the impact of FLC involvement, and analysis of Alzheimer Society data comparing outcomes associated with three types of navigator-client contacts. METHODS: This study used a mixed-method design. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with FLC (n = 3) and clinic team members (n = 6) involved in five clinics. Data were analyzed using thematic inductive analysis. A longitudinal retrospective analysis was conducted with previously collected Alzheimer Society First Link database records. Memory clinic clients were compared to self- and direct-referred clients in the geographic area of the clinics on time to first contact, duration, and number of contacts. RESULTS: Three key themes were identified in both FLC and team interviews: perceived benefits to patients and families of FLC involvement, benefits to memory clinic team members, and impact of rural location. Whereas other team members assessed the patient, only FLC focused on caregivers, providing emotional and psychological support, connection to services, and symptom management. Face-to-face contact helped FLC establish a relationship with caregivers that facilitated future contacts. Team members were relieved knowing caregiver needs were addressed and learned about dementia subtypes and available services they could recommend to non-clinic clients with dementia. Although challenges of rural location included fewer available services and travel challenges in winter, the FLC role was even more important because it may be the only support available. CONCLUSIONS: FLC and team members identified perceived benefits of an embedded FLC for patients, caregivers, and themselves, many of which were linked to the FLC being in person.


Subject(s)
Primary Health Care , Rural Health Services , Humans , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Saskatchewan , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , Female , Male , Alzheimer Disease/therapy , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Patient Navigation/organization & administration , Qualitative Research , Interviews as Topic , Aged , Patient Care Team/organization & administration
11.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 162, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730368

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Interprofessional primary care teams (IPCTs) work together to enhance care. Despite evidence on the benefits of IPCTs, implementation remains challenging. This research aims to 1) identify and prioritize barriers and enablers, and 2) co-develop team-level strategies to support IPCT implementation in Nova Scotia, Canada. METHODS: Healthcare providers and staff of IPCTs were invited to complete an online survey to identify barriers and enablers, and the degree to which each item impacted the functioning of their team. Top ranked items were identified using the sum of frequency x impact for each response. A virtual knowledge sharing event was held to identify strategies to address local barriers and enablers that impact team functioning. RESULTS: IPCT members (n = 117), with a mix of clinic roles and experience, completed the survey. The top three enablers identified were access to technological tools to support their role, standardized processes for using the technological tools, and having a team manager to coordinate collaboration. The top three barriers were limited opportunity for daily team communication, lack of conflict resolution strategies, and lack of capacity building opportunities. IPCT members, administrators, and patients attended the knowledge sharing event (n = 33). Five strategies were identified including: 1) balancing patient needs and provider scope of practice, 2) holding regular and accessible meetings, 3) supporting team development opportunities, 4) supporting professional development, and 5) supporting involvement in non-clinical activities. INTERPRETATION: This research contextualized evidence to further understand local perspectives and experiences of barriers and enablers to the implementation of IPCTs. The knowledge exchange event identified actionable strategies that IPCTs and healthcare administrators can tailor to support teams and care for patients.


Subject(s)
Interprofessional Relations , Patient Care Team , Primary Health Care , Nova Scotia , Humans , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , Cooperative Behavior , Male , Female , Information Dissemination/methods , Adult , Health Personnel
12.
J Nurs Adm ; 54(6): 333-340, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767524

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Patient-Aligned Care Team (PACT) members have a shared understanding/ agreement upon and enact responsibilities within the team. BACKGROUND: The PACT model focuses on team-based care management. However, lack of a shared understanding of team-based care management roles and responsibilities makes system-wide implementation a challenge. METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of national survey data collected in 2022 from primary care personnel working in a VHA-affiliated primary care facility. RESULTS: Significant discrepancies exist in responses about what core team members say they do and what others perceive they should be doing, indicating either a lack of agreement, knowledge, or training about what core team members should do. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of a team-based model requires adequate support and training for teamwork including shared mental models to work according to their clinical competency. Clear guidance and communication of expectations are critical for role clarity.


Subject(s)
Patient Care Team , Patient-Centered Care , Primary Health Care , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humans , United States , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , Male , Female
13.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 13: e55297, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713507

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Injury is a global health concern, and injury-related mortality disproportionately impacts low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Compelling evidence from observational studies in high-income countries shows that trauma education programs, such as the Rural Trauma Team Development Course (RTTDC), increase clinician knowledge of injury care. There is a dearth of such evidence from controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the effect of the RTTDC on process and patient outcomes in LMICs. OBJECTIVE: This multicenter cluster randomized controlled clinical trial aims to examine the impact of the RTTDC on process and patient outcomes associated with motorcycle accident-related injuries in an African low-resource setting. METHODS: This is a 2-arm, parallel, multi-period, cluster randomized, controlled, clinical trial in Uganda, where rural trauma team development training is not routinely conducted. We will recruit regional referral hospitals and include patients with motorcycle accident-related injuries, interns, medical trainees, and road traffic law enforcement professionals. The intervention group (RTTDC) and control group (standard care) will include 3 hospitals each. The primary outcomes will be the interval from the accident to hospital admission and the interval from the referral decision to hospital discharge. The secondary outcomes will be all-cause mortality and morbidity associated with neurological and orthopedic injuries at 90 days after injury. All outcomes will be measured as final values. We will compare baseline characteristics and outcomes at both individual and cluster levels between the intervention and control groups. We will use mixed effects regression models to report any absolute or relative differences along with 95% CIs. We will perform subgroup analyses to evaluate and control confounding due to injury mechanisms and injury severity. We will establish a motorcycle trauma outcome (MOTOR) registry in consultation with community traffic police. RESULTS: The trial was approved on August 27, 2019. The actual recruitment of the first patient participant began on September 01, 2019. The last follow-up was on August 27, 2023. Posttrial care, including linkage to clinical, social support, and referral services, is to be completed by November 27, 2023. Data analyses will be performed in Spring 2024, and the results are expected to be published in Autumn 2024. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will unveil how a locally contextualized rural trauma team development program impacts organizational efficiency in a continent challenged with limited infrastructure and human resources. Moreover, this trial will uncover how rural trauma team coordination impacts clinical outcomes, such as mortality and morbidity associated with neurological and orthopedic injuries, which are the key targets for strengthening trauma systems in LMICs where prehospital care is in the early stage. Our results could inform the design, implementation, and scalability of future rural trauma teams and trauma education programs in LMICs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202308851460352); https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=25763. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/55297.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic , Motorcycles , Humans , Accidents, Traffic/mortality , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Uganda/epidemiology , Registries , Female , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , Adult , Male , Rural Population
14.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 32(1): 46, 2024 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773532

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUNDS: Team leadership skills of physicians working in high-performing medical teams are directly related to outcome. It is currently unclear how these skills can best be developed. Therefore, in this multi-national cross-sectional prospective study, we explored the development of these skills in relation to physician-, organization- and training characteristics of Helicopter Emergency Medicine Service (HEMS) physicians from services in Europe, the United States of America and Australia. METHODS: Physicians were asked to complete a survey regarding their HEMS service, training, and background as well as a full Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ). Primary outcomes were the 12 leadership subdomain scores as described in the LBDQ. Secondary outcome measures were the association of LBDQ subdomain scores with specific physician-, organization- or training characteristics and self-reported ways to improve leadership skills in HEMS physicians. RESULTS: In total, 120 HEMS physicians completed the questionnaire. Overall, leadership LBDQ subdomain scores were high (10 out of 12 subdomains exceeded 70% of the maximum score). Whereas physician characteristics such as experience or base-specialty were unrelated to leadership qualities, both organization- and training characteristics were important determinants of leadership skill development. Attention to leadership skills during service induction, ongoing leadership training, having standards in place to ensure (regular) scenario training and holding structured mission debriefs each correlated with multiple LBDQ subdomain scores. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing training of leadership skills should be stimulated and facilitated by organizations as it contributes to higher levels of proficiency, which may translate into a positive effect on patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.


Subject(s)
Leadership , Humans , Prospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Surveys and Questionnaires , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Adult , Clinical Competence , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Middle Aged , Emergency Medicine/education , Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Air Ambulances/organization & administration , United States , Europe
15.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(7): 102613, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692446

ABSTRACT

Catheter ablation has become an accepted first line therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) being the key element of ablation strategies. Catheter ablation of AF has been proven to be superior to antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy regarding efficacy and improvement of survival in patients with heart failure. PVI has become a routine treatment procedure in recent decades especially for patients with symptomatic PAF. Recent research investigations have shown that AF recurrence still occurs in a significant number of patients after ablation. AF recurrence leads to a decrease in patients' quality of life and is related to an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. As most arrhythmia recurrences take place within the first 3 months after the initial procedure, this time period is seen as a so-called "blanking period", in which ablation is not recommended, since up to 50 % of patients can become arrhythmia free in the long run. Ablation therapy, however, is less successful in patients suffering from long standing persistent AF, with a 20.3 % success rate after a single procedure and a 45 % success rate after multiple RFA procedures. Several scores have been established and validated to predict cardiac rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation. However, due to the lack of external validation of most of the scores, their efficacy in predicting recurrence of atrial fibrillation needs to be further evaluated in independent external studies.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Humans , Catheter Ablation/methods , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Recurrence , Pulmonary Veins/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Quality of Life
16.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(5): 324, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700723

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify elements of timely integration of palliative care (PC) into hospital oncology care from best practices. Thereafter, to assess the level of consensus among oncology and PC specialists and patient and relative representatives on the characteristics of timely integration of PC. METHODS: A three-round modified Delphi study was conducted. The expert panel consisted of 83 healthcare professionals (HCPs) from 21 Dutch hospitals (43 physicians, 40 nurses), 6 patient and 2 relative representatives. In the first round, four elements of integrated PC were considered: (1) identification of potential PC needs, (2) advance care planning (ACP), (3) routine symptom monitoring and (4) involvement of the specialist palliative care team (SPCT). In subsequent rounds, the panellists assessed which characteristics were triggers for initiating an element. A priori consensus was set at ≥ 70%. RESULTS: A total of 71 (78%) panellists completed the first questionnaire, 65 (71%) the second and 49 (54%) the third. Panellists agreed that all patients with incurable cancer should have their PC needs assessed (97%), symptoms monitored (91%) and ACP initiated (86%). The SPCT should be involved at the patient's request (86%) or when patients suffer from increased symptom burden on multiple dimensions (76%). Patients with a life expectancy of less than 3 months should be offered a consultation (71%). CONCLUSION: The expert panel agreed that timely integration of PC into oncology is important for all patients with incurable cancer, using early identification, ACP and routine symptom monitoring. Involvement of the SPCT is particularly needed in patients with multidimensional symptom burden and in those nearing death.


Subject(s)
Delphi Technique , Neoplasms , Palliative Care , Humans , Palliative Care/methods , Palliative Care/organization & administration , Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Netherlands , Female , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Advance Care Planning/organization & administration , Adult , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Consensus , Time Factors , Patient Care Team/organization & administration
17.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 617, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730416

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Efficient planning of the oral health workforce in Primary Health Care (PHC) is paramount to ensure equitable community access to services. This requires a meticulous examination of the population's needs, strategic distribution of oral health professionals, and effective human resource management. In this context, the average time spent on care to meet the needs of users/families/communities is the central variable in healthcare professional workforce planning methods. However, many time measures are solely based on professional judgment or experience. OBJECTIVE: Calculate the average time parameters for the activities carried out by the oral health team in primary health care. METHOD: This is a descriptive observational study using the time-motion method carried out in five Primary Health Care Units in the city of São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Direct and continuous observation of oral health team members occurred for 40 h spread over five days of a typical work week. RESULTS: A total of 696.05 h of observation were conducted with 12 Dentists, three Oral Health Assistants, and five Oral Health Technicians. The Dentists' main activity was consultation with an average duration of 24.39 min, which took up 42.36% of their working time, followed by documentation with 12.15%. Oral Health Assistants spent 31.57% of their time on infection control, while Oral Health Technicians spent 22.37% on documentation. CONCLUSION: The study establishes time standards for the activities performed by the dental care team and provides support for the application of workforce planning methods that allow for review and optimization of the work process and public policies.


Subject(s)
Primary Health Care , Time and Motion Studies , Humans , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Brazil , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Oral Health
19.
Ann Fam Med ; 22(3): 203-207, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806273

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Despite increased clinician awareness of systemic racism, lack of substantial action toward antiracism exists within health care. Clinical staff perspectives, particularly those of racial-ethnic minorities/persons of color (POC) who disproportionately occupy support staff roles with less power on the team, can yield insights into barriers to progress and can inform future efforts to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI, also referred to as EDI) within health care settings. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of staff members on race and role power dynamics within community health clinic teams. METHODS: We conducted semistructured 45-minute interviews with staff members working in community health clinics in a large urban health care system from May to July 2021. We implemented purposeful recruitment to oversample POC and support staff and to achieve equal representation from the 13 community health clinics in the system. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed over 6 months using a critical-ideological paradigm. Themes reflecting experiences related to race and role power dynamics were identified. RESULTS: Our cohort had 60 participants: 42 (70%) were support staff (medical assistants, front desk clerks, care navigators, nurses) and 18 (30%) were clinicians and clinic leaders. The large majority of participants were aged 26 to 40 years (60%), were female (83%), and were POC (68%). Five themes emerged: (1) POC face hidden challenges, (2) racial discrimination persists, (3) power dynamics perpetuate inaction, (4) interpersonal actions foster safety and equity, and (5) system-level change is needed for cultural shift. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the race and role power dynamics within care teams, including experiences of staff members with less power, is critical to advancing DEI in health care.


Subject(s)
Qualitative Research , Racism , Humans , Female , Male , Adult , Community Health Centers/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , Power, Psychological , Health Personnel/psychology , Ethnicity/psychology , Cultural Diversity , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Minority Groups/psychology , Interviews as Topic , Middle Aged
20.
Rev Infirm ; 73(301): 19-20, 2024 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796236

ABSTRACT

Transforming healthcare provision to better meet healthcare needs and ensure continuity of care requires the development of coordinated practice. Whether it's a multi-professional health center (MSP), a primary care team (ESP), a territorial professional health community (CPTS) or a health center (CDS), whatever the way it's organized, this type of practice enables the coordination of the various professionals involved in primary care.


Subject(s)
Primary Health Care , Humans , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , France , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Public Health
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...