Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 40
Filter
3.
Ital J Pediatr ; 47(1): 47, 2021 Mar 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33658068

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) has rapidly become a pandemic emergency, distressing health systems in each affected country. Preparation strategies for managing this pandemic have been keys to face the COVID-19 surge all over the world and all levels of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the epidemic, the Italian society of pediatric emergency-urgency (SIMEUP) promoted a national survey aiming to evaluate preparedness and response of pediatric emergency departments (PED) critical in ensuring optimal management of COVID-19 cases. RESULTS: Our results suggest that Italian PED have promptly set a proactive approach to the present emergency. 98.9% of the hospitals have defined special pathways and assistive protocols concerning the management of pediatric COVID-19 cases. The highest percentage of application of the measures for preventive and protective for COVID-19 concerned the use of personal protective equipments. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that the following measures for pediatric patients, admitted in PED, have been promptly implemented throughout the whole country: eg. use of protective devices, pre-triage of patients accessing the hospital. Despite COVID-19 being a new threat, we have shown that by developing an easy-to-follow decision algorithm and clear plans for the interventional platform teams, we can ensure optimal health care workers and patients' safety.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Infection Control/organization & administration , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Child , Clinical Protocols , Hospitalization , Humans , Italy , Personal Protective Equipment , Surveys and Questionnaires , Triage/organization & administration
4.
BMJ Open ; 11(1): e042121, 2021 01 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33452195

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Relatively limited data are available regarding paediatric COVID-19. Although most children appear to have mild or asymptomatic infections, infants and those with comorbidities are at increased risk of experiencing more severe illness and requiring hospitalisation due to COVID-19. The recent but uncommon association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with development of a multisystem inflammatory syndrome has heightened the importance of understanding paediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Paediatric Emergency Research Network-COVID-19 cohort study is a rapid, global, prospective cohort study enrolling 12 500 children who are tested for acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. 47 emergency departments across 12 countries on four continents will participate. At enrolment, regardless of SARS-CoV-2 test results, all children will have the same information collected, including clinical, epidemiological, laboratory, imaging and outcome data. Interventions and outcome data will be collected for hospitalised children. For all children, follow-up at 14 and 90 days will collect information on further medical care received, and long-term sequelae, respectively. Statistical models will be designed to identify risk factors for infection and severe outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Sites will seek ethical approval locally, and informed consent will be obtained. There is no direct risk or benefit of study participation. Weekly interim analysis will allow for real-time data sharing with regional, national, and international policy makers. Harmonisation and sharing of investigation materials with WHO, will contribute to synergising global efforts for the clinical characterisation of paediatric COVID-19. Our findings will enable the implementation of countermeasures to reduce viral transmission and severe COVID-19 outcomes in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04330261.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , International Cooperation , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Child , Hospitalization , Humans , Prospective Studies , Research Design , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
5.
Bol. malariol. salud ambient ; 60(2): 101-105, dic.2020. tab.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIVECS | ID: biblio-1509621

ABSTRACT

El Covid 19 es un coronavirus que afecta directamente al sistema respiratorio, es de un elevado nivel de contagio, provocando que los hospitales han visto desbordado sus servicios de emergencia. El área de triage que atiende la unidad de emergencia pediátrica del hospital General Puyo, no escapa a esta realidad. Es por ello que el presente estudio tiene como fin establecer el nivel de conocimiento que presenta el personal de enfermería que labora en el área de triage sobre los procedimientos de clasificación de los pacientes en medio de la pandemia del Covid 19. El estudio fue descriptivo, de corte transversal. La técnica que se utilizó para la recolección de datos es la encuesta. Como instrumento se utilizó un cuestionario dicotómico aplicado a 21 enfermeras del Hospital Provincial General Puyo que desempeñan funciones en el servicio de emergencia. En conclusión, que el área de la emergencia pediátrica referida al triage de emergencia, le debe crear un mayor compromiso al personal de enfermería por mejorar su conocimiento sobre el nivel de atención que posee cada paciente y más aún él era de pediatría que es el sector más indefenso porque muchas veces no saben expresar que es lo que está sintiendo. Resalando finalmente, que durante el , desarrollo de esa investigación, se cumplieron las normas éticas establecidas por la OMS y OPS para el abordaje de pacientes positivo covid-19(AU)


Covid 19 is a coronavirus that directly affects the respiratory system, it is of a high level of contagion for this reason, hospitals have seen their emergency services overwhelmed, in this sense the triage area that attends the pediatric emergency unit of the hospital General Puyo, does not escape this reality. That is why the present study aims to establish the level of knowledge presented by the nursing staff working in the triage area about the procedures for classifying patients in the midst of the Covid 19 pandemic. The study was descriptive, cross-sectional. the technique used for data collection is the survey. The instrument used was a dichotomous questionnaire applied to 21 nurses from the Puyo Provincial General Hospital who perform functions in the emergency service. In conclusion, that the pediatric emergency area, referring to emergency triage, should create a greater commitment to the nursing staff to improve their knowledge about the level of care that each patient has and even more so he was pediatric, which is the sector more defenseless because many times they do not know how to express what they are feeling(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Pediatrics/organization & administration , Triage/organization & administration , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , Argentina
6.
BMJ Open ; 10(8): e039897, 2020 08 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32788192

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Relevant guidelines and consensuses for COVID-19 contain recommendations aimed at optimising the management in paediatric wards. The goal of this study was to determine the quality of those recommendations and provide suggestions to hospital managers for the adjustment of existing hospital prevention and control strategies, and also to offer recommendations for further research. DESIGN: A rapid review of the guidelines and consensuses for the management in paediatric wards facing COVID-19. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, UpToDate, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Wanfang database and relevant websites such as medlive.cn, dxy.cn, the National Health and Health Commission and the China Center for Disease Control and Prevention were systematically searched through late May 2020. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool was then used to assess the quality of the selected articles and summarise the relevant evidence concerning management in paediatric wards. RESULTS: A total of 35 articles were included, composed of 3 consensus guidelines, 25 expert consensuses and 7 expert opinions. Of the 35 papers, 24 were from China, 2 from the USA, 1 from Spain, 1 from Brazil, 1 from Saudi Arabia and 6 from multinational cooperative studies. Scores for the six domains of the AGREE II tool (scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity of presentation, applicability and editorial independence) were 98.57%, 53.57%, 17.92%, 69.62%, 26.96% and 50.35%, respectively. Recommendations for nosocomial infection and control, human resource management as well as management of paediatric patients and their families were summarised. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the outbreak of COVID-19, the quality of rapid guidelines and consensuses for the management in paediatric wards affected by COVID-19 is unsatisfactory. In the future, it will be necessary to develop more high-quality guidelines or consensuses for the management in paediatric wards to deal with nosocomial outbreaks in order to fully prepare for emergency medical and health problems.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospital Departments/organization & administration , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Counseling , Family , Humans , Pandemics , Patient Isolation , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , Visitors to Patients
7.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 36(9): 452-454, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732779

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We present a blueprint for the reallocation of pediatric emergency resources in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: New York-Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medical Center is an urban, quaternary, academic medical center, a level 1 trauma center, and a regional burn center located in New York City. The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic created a unique challenge for pediatric emergency medicine. As the crisis heightened for adult patients, pediatric emergency services experienced a significant decline in volume and acuity. RESULTS: We offer guidelines to modify physical space, clinical services, staffing models, and the importance of steady leadership. Pediatric emergency space was converted to adult COVID-19 beds, necessitating the repurposing of nonclinical areas for pediatric patients. Efficient clinical pathways were created in collaboration with medical and surgical subspecialists for expedited emergency care of children. We transitioned staffing models to meet the changing clinical demands of the emergency department by both reallocation of pediatric emergency medicine providers to telemedicine and by expanding their clinical care to adult patients. Concentrated communication and receptiveness by hospital and department leadership were fundamental to address the dynamic state of the pandemic and ensure provider wellness. CONCLUSIONS: Modification of physical space, clinical services, staffing models, and the importance of steady leadership enabled us to maintain outstanding clinical care for pediatric patients while maximizing capacity and service for adult COVID-19 patients in the emergency department.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Health Resources/supply & distribution , Pandemics , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Humans , New York City/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/methods
8.
Clin Chem ; 66(6): 802-808, 2020 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32359149

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fever is one of the leading causes of consultation in the pediatric emergency department for patients under the age of 3 years. Distinguishing between bacterial and viral infections etiologies in febrile patients remains challenging. We hypothesized that specific host biomarkers for viral infections, such as type I-interferon (IFN), could help clinicians' decisions and limit antibiotic overuse. METHODS: Paxgene tubes and serum were collected from febrile children (n = 101), age from 7 days to 36 months, with proven viral or bacterial infections, being treated at pediatric emergency departments in France. We assessed the performance of an IFN signature, which was based on quantification of expression of IFN-stimulated genes using the Nanostring® technology and plasma IFN-α quantified by digital ELISA technology. RESULTS: Serum concentrations of IFN-α were below the quantification threshold (30 fg/mL) for 2% (1/46) of children with proven viral infections and for 71% (39/55) of children with bacterial infections (P < 0.001). IFN-α concentrations and IFN score were significantly higher in viral compared to bacterial infection (P < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between serum IFN-α concentrations and IFN score (p-pearson = 0.83). Both serum IFN-α concentration and IFN score robustly discriminated (Area Under the Curve >0.91 for both) between viral and bacterial infection in febrile children, compared to C-reactive protein (0.83). CONCLUSIONS: IFN-α is increased in blood of febrile infants with viral infections. The discriminative performance of IFN-α femtomolar concentrations as well as blood transcriptional signatures could show a diagnostic benefit and potentially limit antibiotic overuse. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03163628).


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Interferon Type I/blood , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Biomarkers/blood , Child, Preschool , Diagnosis, Differential , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Fever , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/methods , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Prospective Studies
10.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 36(2): e66-e71, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28376068

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: When obtaining informed permission from parents for invasive procedures, trainees and supervisors often do not disclose information about the trainee's level of experience. The objectives of this study were 3-fold: (1) to assess parents' understanding of both academic medical training and the role of the trainee and the supervisor, (2) to explore parents' preferences about transparency related to a trainee's experience, and (3) to examine parents' willingness to allow trainees to perform invasive procedures. METHODS: This qualitative study involved 23 one-on-one interviews with parents of infants younger than 30 days who had undergone a lumbar puncture. In line with grounded theory, researchers independently coded transcripts and then collectively refined codes and created themes. Data collection and analysis continued until thematic saturation was achieved. In addition, to triangulate the findings, a focus group was conducted with Yale School of Medicine's Community Bioethics Forum. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed 4 primary themes: (1) the invasive nature of a lumbar puncture and the vulnerability of the newborn creates fear in parents, which may be mitigated by improved communication; (2) parents have varying degrees of awareness of the medical training system; (3) most parents expect transparency about provider experience level and trust that a qualified provider will be performing the procedure; and (4) parents prefer an experienced provider to perform a procedure, but supervisor presence may be a qualifying factor for inexperienced providers. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians must find a way to improve transparency when caring for pediatric patients while still developing critical procedural skills.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Education, Medical, Graduate , Parents/psychology , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/education , Spinal Puncture/methods , Adult , Clinical Competence , Communication , Emergency Service, Hospital , Fear , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Qualitative Research , Trust , Young Adult
11.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 36(2): e50-e55, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29095388

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to create a multivariable model of standardized relative value units per hour by adjusting for nonprovider factors that influence efficiency. METHODS: We obtained productivity data based on billing records measured in emergency relative value units for (1) both evaluation and management of visits and (2) procedures for 16 pediatric emergency medicine providers with more than 750 hours worked per year. Eligible shifts were in an urban, academic pediatric emergency department (ED) with 2 sites: a tertiary care main campus and a satellite community site. We used multivariable linear regression to adjust for the impact of shift and pediatric ED characteristics on individual-provider efficiency and then removed variables from the model with minimal effect on productivity. RESULTS: There were 2998 eligible shifts for the 16 providers during a 3-year period. The resulting model included 4 variables when looking at both ED sites combined. These variables include the following: (1) number of procedures billed by provider, (2) season of the year, (3) shift start time, and (4) day of week. Results were improved when we separately modeled each ED location. A 3-variable model using procedures billed by provider, shift start time, and season explained 23% of the variation in provider efficiency at the academic ED site. A 3-variable model using procedures billed by provider, patient arrivals per hour, and shift start time explained 45% of the variation in provider efficiency at the satellite ED site. CONCLUSIONS: Several nonprovider factors affect provider efficiency. These factors should be considered when designing productivity-based incentives.


Subject(s)
Efficiency , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Efficiency, Organizational/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Linear Models , Models, Theoretical , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Workload/statistics & numerical data
12.
Emergencias (Sant Vicenç dels Horts) ; 31(4): 239-244, ago. 2019. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-182764

ABSTRACT

Objetivos: Validar distintos métodos destinados a estimar el peso en pacientes pediátricos en urgencias. Metodología: Serie de casos prospectivo con análisis transversal en pacientes de 1 mes hasta 14 años de edad en dos hospitales terciarios en el País Vasco (España). Se aplicaron 9 herramientas distintas de estimación de peso y se comparó el resultado con el peso real, calculando índices de concordancia (CCI), media de la diferencia y proporción de mediciones con un error del peso estimado inferior al 10% y 20% con respecto al peso real. Resultados: Se realizaron mediciones en 515 pacientes pediátricos. Todas las estimaciones presentaron una alta concordancia con respecto al peso real. La estimación parental del peso resultó la estrategia con menor margen de error (86,5% de mediciones con error < 10%), seguida de la Regla RCP del Hospital del Niño Jesús (63,5% de mediciones con error <10%). Las fórmulas de estimación basadas en edad o antropometría no ofrecieron proporciones superiores al 40% de mediciones con un error < 10%. Conclusiones: La estimación parental es una herramienta válida para la estimación del peso en niños. Cuando no está disponible esa opción, la Regla de RCP del Hospital del Niño Jesús sería la herramienta de elección


Objectives: To determine the validity of different ways of estimating body weight in children attended in the emergency department. Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study of a series of patients between 1 month and 14 years of age attended in 2 tertiary care hospitals in the Basque Country, Spain. We used 9 different ways to estimate body weight and compared the estimates to real weight by calculating the mean intraclass correlation coefficient, the mean difference between real and estimated weights, and the proportion of measurements within 10% and 20% of the real weight. Results: Five hundred fifteen pediatric patients were weighed and their weights estimated. All estimates had a high degree of agreement with real weight. A parent's weight estimate performed best: 86.5% of parental estimates were within 10% of the real weight. The next best estimate was achieved with the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) rule developed at Hospital del Niño Jesús: 65% of the estimates were within the 10% margin. Fewer than 40% of the weight estimates based on formulas using anthropometric measurements were within the 10% margin. Conclusions: A parent's estimate of weight is a valid approximation in children of all ages. When this estimate is not available, the CPR rule of Hospital del Niño Jesús would be the method of choice


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Body Weights and Measures/methods , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/methods , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Health Status Indicators , Anthropometry/methods , Prospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data
13.
Arch Dis Child ; 104(9): 869-873, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31023707

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM) network is a collaborative group of 69 paediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians from 20 countries in Europe, initiated in 2006. To further improve paediatric emergency care in Europe, the aim of this study was to define research priorities for PEM in Europe to guide the development of future research projects. DESIGN AND SETTING: We carried out an online survey in a modified three-stage Delphi study. Eligible participants were members of the REPEM network. In stage 1, the REPEM steering committee prepared a list of research topics. In stage 2, REPEM members rated on a 6-point scale research topics and they could add research topics and comment on the list for further refinement. Stage 3 included further prioritisation using the Hanlon Process of Prioritisation (HPP) to give more emphasis to the feasibility of a research topic. RESULTS: Based on 52 respondents (response rates per stage varying from 41% to 57%), we identified the conditions 'fever', 'sepsis' and 'respiratory infections', and the processes/interventions 'biomarkers', 'risk stratification' and 'practice variation' as common themes of research interest. The HPP identified highest priority for 4 of the 5 highest prioritised items by the Delphi process, incorporating prevalence and severity of each condition and feasibility of undertaking such research. CONCLUSIONS: While the high diversity in emergency department (ED) populations, cultures, healthcare systems and healthcare delivery in European PEM prompts to focus on practice variation of ED conditions, our defined research priority list will help guide further collaborative research efforts within the REPEM network to improve PEM care in Europe.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Health Priorities , Pediatric Emergency Medicine , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Child , Delphi Technique , Europe/epidemiology , Health Services Research , Humans , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration
15.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 35(9): 611-617, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28419017

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to compare the outcomes of pediatric trauma patients with motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) and motor vehicle versus pedestrian crashes (MPCs) at a level 1 pediatric trauma center in the United States and a pediatric trauma center in Turkey. METHODS: The medical records of all pediatric MVC and MPC subjects presenting to the emergency departments (EDs) of a level 3 hospital in Turkey (Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital [ITTRH]) and a level 1 pediatric trauma center in the United States (Children's Medical Center Dallas [CMCD]) over a 1-year period were reviewed. Data that were collected include patient demographics, prehospital report (mechanism of injury, mode of transportation), injury severity score (ISS), abbreviated injury scale score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, ED length of stay, ED interventions, ED and hospital disposition, and mortality. Patients with moderate (ISS, 5-15) and severe (ISS, >15) trauma scores were included in the study. RESULTS: One hundred six patient charts from the ITTRH and 125 patient charts from the CMCD with moderate and severe ISS due to MVCs and MPCs were reviewed. Most of the patients were pedestrians (86%) in the ITTRH group and passengers (60%) in the CMCD group. The percentage of patients transferred by ambulance (ground or air) to the CMCD and the ITTRH was 97.9% and 85%, respectively. Fifteen percent of ITTRH patients and 2.1% of CMCD patients arrived by private vehicle. Emergency department arrival ISS and Glasgow Coma Scale were similar between the 2 hospitals (P > 0.05). The overall mortality rate in the study population was 8.8% (11/125) at the CMCD and 4.7% (5/106) at the ITTRH. (P = 0.223). Blood product utilization was significantly higher in the CMCD group compared with the ITTRH group (P = 0.005). The use of hypertonic saline/mannitol/hyperventilation in patients with significant head trauma and increased intracranial pressure was higher in the ITTRH group (P = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that compared pediatric trauma care and outcome at a level 1 pediatric trauma center in the United States and a pediatric hospital in Turkey. Our findings highlight the opportunities to improve pediatric trauma care in Turkey. Specifically, there is a need for national trauma registries, enhanced trauma education, and standardized trauma patient care protocols. In addition, efforts should be directed toward improving prehospital care through better integration within the health care system and physician participation in educating prehospital providers. Data and organized trauma care will be instrumental in system-wide improvement and developing appropriate injury-prevention strategies.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Pedestrians/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Texas/epidemiology , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Turkey/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/mortality
16.
Acad Emerg Med ; 26(2): 174-182, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30069952

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Today's emergency department (ED) providers spend a significant amount of time on medical record documentation, decreasing clinical productivity. One proposed solution is to utilize medical scribes who assist with documentation. We hypothesized that scribes would increase provider productivity and increase provider satisfaction without affecting patient experience or nursing satisfaction. METHODS: We conducted an observational pre-post study comparing ED prescribe and postscribe clinical productivity metrics for 18 pediatric emergency medicine physicians, two general pediatricians, and two nurse practitioners working in the 12-bed nonurgent area of the pediatric ED. Productivity metrics included patients per hour (pts/hr), work relative value units per hour (wRVUs/hr), and visit duration measured for 1 year pre- and postscribe implementation. Cross-sectional satisfaction surveys were administered to patient families, providers, and nurses during the initial scribe rollout. RESULTS: Overall, 24,518 prescribe and 27,062 postscribe visits were analyzed. Following scribe implementation, overall provider efficiency increased by 0.24 pts/hr (11.98%, p < 0.001) and 0.72 wRVUs/hr (20.14%, p < 0.001). The largest efficiency increase (0.36 pts/hr, 0.96 wRVUs/hr) occurred in January-March, when ED census peaked. Patient visit duration was 53 minutes in both the prescribe and the postscribe periods. During initial scribe implementation, 80% of parents of patients without a scribe rated the visit as very good/great compared to 84% with a scribe (p = 0.218). Of the 34 providers surveyed, 88% preferred working with a scribe. A majority of providers (82%) felt that their skills were used more effectively when working with a scribe, decreasing their likelihood of experiencing burnout. Of the 43 nurses surveyed, 51% preferred scribes and 47% were indifferent. CONCLUSIONS: Medical scribes increased ED efficiency without decreasing patient satisfaction. Providers strongly favored the use of scribes, while nurses were indifferent. The next steps include a cost analysis of the scribe program.


Subject(s)
Documentation/methods , Efficiency, Organizational , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Satisfaction , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Program Evaluation , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
Acad Emerg Med ; 26(2): 205-216, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30019793

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Many emergency department (ED) transfers of children may be avoidable. Identifying hospital-level variables associated with avoidable transfers may guide system-level interventions to improve pediatric emergency care. We sought to examine hospital characteristics associated with ED transfers deemed "probably avoidable" in a large state Medicaid program. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using 2009 to 2013 claims data for Pennsylvania Medicaid beneficiaries. We categorized all ED transfers of children < 17 years old as "probably avoidable," "possibly avoidable", or "unavoidable" based on ultimate disposition and procedures (including subspecialty consultations) at the receiving ED. Using descriptive statistics and multivariable regression, we examined hospital characteristics associated with probably avoidable transfers. RESULTS: Among 2,839,379 pediatric visits to EDs across 158 Pennsylvania hospitals, 20,304 resulted in transfer. Among these, 3,764 (18.5%) were categorized as probably avoidable and 6,091 (30.0%) as possibly avoidable transfers. In adjusted analysis, compared to hospitals with no pediatric-specific capabilities, probably avoidable transfers were less likely from referring hospitals with pediatric-specific EDs and no other pediatric-specific capabilities (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.21-0.71) and from referring hospitals with pediatric-specific EDs and inpatient capabilities (aOR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.20-0.64). Probably avoidable transfers were more likely from referring hospitals in large metropolitan areas (aOR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.46-4.80) compared to those in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: Among pediatric emergency transfers in a large state Medicaid program with a nearly 20% probably avoidable transfer rate, there was significant hospital-level variation in the proportion of probably avoidable transfers. Transfers from hospitals in large metropolitan areas and transfers from hospitals without pediatric-specific capabilities had increased odds of being probably avoidable transfers, such that these hospitals may represent targets for interventions to reduce these transfers.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Pennsylvania , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
18.
Horiz. enferm ; 30(3): 254-270, 2019. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1223569

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: El número de consultas de urgencias pediátricas en los últimos años han experimentado un aumento notable. Muchos son los factores que influyen en el uso de los servicios sanitarios y en el uso que los padres hacen de estos servicios. Se ha demostrado que la autoeficacia parental juega un papel fundamental en el manejo de la salud y la enfermedad de los niños, y puede que también lo esté haciendo en el uso de los servicios de salud. OBJETIVO: Se plantea esta revisión narrativa de la literatura, con el propósito de explorar el papel que la autoeficacia parental tiene en el cuidado de los niños y el uso de los servicios sanitarios. MÉTODO: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en Pubmed, Cinhal y Psyc-Info. RESULTADOS: No se encontraron estudios que explorasen de manera directa la autoeficacia parental y el uso de los servicios sanitarios. Sin embargo, la relación existente entre el concepto de autoeficacia y el manejo de la salud infantil y las enfermedades menores conduce a pensar que la autoeficacia parental puede estar jugando un papel importante en el uso de los servicios sanitarios. CONCLUSIÓN: Es necesario llevar a cabo estudios que ayuden a explorar la relación entre la autoeficacia parental y el uso de los servicios. Esta información puede ser de gran ayuda para planificar acciones de educación para la salud acordes con las necesidades de esta población y contribuir a la sostenibilidad del sistema, reduciendo las visitas innecesarias a los servicios de urgencias.


INTRODUCTION: The number of visits to emergency departments in recent years has increased significantly. There are many factors that influence the use of health services and the use that parents make of these services. It has been shown that parental self-efficacy plays a fundamental role in the management of children's health and illness and may also be the case in the use of health services. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this narrative review was to explore the role that parental self-efficacy plays in the care of children and the use of health services. METHODS: To this end, a bibliographic search was carried out in Pubmed, Cinhal and PsycINFO. RESULTS: No studies were found that directly explored parental self-efficacy and the use of health services. However, the relationship between the concept of self-efficacy and the management of children's health and minor illnesses shown in the literature points out towards the idea that parental self-efficacy may be playing an important role in the use of health services. CONCLUSION: Future observational studies are necessary to explore the relationship between parental-self-efficacy and use of service. This information can be of great help in planning health education actions according to the needs of this population and contributing to the sustainability of the system, decreasing unnecessary visits to the emergency departments.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Parent-Child Relations , Child Health Services , Child Health , Self Efficacy , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Child Care , Health Education , Narration
20.
Acad Emerg Med ; 25(12): 1345-1354, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30312993

ABSTRACT

The evidence supporting best practices when treating children in the prehospital setting or even the effect emergency medical services (EMS) has on patient outcomes is limited. Standardizing the critical outcomes for EMS research will allow for focused and comparable effort among the small but growing group of pediatric EMS investigators on specific topics. Standardized outcomes will also provide the opportunity to collectively advance the science of EMS for children and demonstrate the effect of EMS on patient outcomes. This article describes a consensus process among stakeholders in the pediatric emergency medicine and EMS community that identified the critical outcomes for EMS care in five clinical areas (traumatic brain injury, general injury, respiratory disease/failure, sepsis, and seizures). These areas were selected based on both their known public health importance and their commonality in EMS encounters. Key research outcomes identified by participating stakeholders using a modified nominal group technique for consensus building, which included small group brainstorming and independent voting for ranking outcomes that were feasible and/or important for the field.


Subject(s)
Health Services Research/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Child , Humans , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...