Kidney Disease-Specific Scores and Health Utility of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Patients and Their Caregivers.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), the visual analogue scale (VAS), and the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-Item Short-Form Survey (KDQOL-36) scores of Thai continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) patients and to compare the utility scores with the EQ-5D-5L and VAS scores of caregivers. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study completed between April 2016 and May 2017. In total, 34 CAPD patients, 30 APD patients, and their caregivers were recruited from a large university hospital in Thailand. A trained interviewer conducted face-to-face interviews. We collected demographic data and used the KDQOL-36 and EuroQol questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L and VAS) to assess the health-related quality of life. Caregivers were asked to assess their own health status using the EQ-5D-5L and VAS. RESULTS: The EQ-5D-5L and VAS responses of the CAPD and APD patients and their caregivers were not significantly different (P > .05). More than 50% of both patient groups had mobility problems, whereas most patients had no problems with self-care, doing usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. As for the KDQOL-36, the physical and mental component summaries were not significantly different, and neither were the scores for all of the kidney disease-specific dimensions, including symptoms or problems, effects of kidney disease, and burden of kidney disease (all were P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the quality of life of CAPD and APD patients and their caregivers were mostly equivalent. A further longitudinal study of utility score assessments of the differences in modality would be advantageous.

Impact of Volume Management on Volume Overload and Rehospitalization in CAPD Patients.

Heart failure due to volume overload is a major reason for rehospitalization in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Strict volume control provides better cardiac functions and blood pressure in this population. Volume management, which is a volume control strategy, may decrease volume overload and related complications. Using a quasi-experimental design, 66 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group ( n = 34) and control group ( n = 32). The patients were followed up for 6 months with scheduled clinic and/or telephone visits; the intervention group adopted volume management strategy, while the control group adopted conventional care. Volume overload and cardiac function were compared between the two groups at the baseline and at 6 months. At Month 6, the intervention group resulted in significant improvement in volume overloaded status, cardiac function, and volume-overload-related rehospitalization. Volume management strategy allows for better control of volume overload and is associated with fewer volume-related readmissions.

Routine Monitoring of Sodium and Phosphorus Removal in Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Patients Treated with Continuous Ambulatory PD (CAPD), Automated PD (APD) or Combined CAPD+APD.

BACKGROUND: Adequate removal of sodium (Na) and phosphorus (P) is of paramount importance for patients with dialysis-dependent kidney disease can easily quantified in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Some studies suggest that automated PD (APD) results in lower Na and P removal. METHODS: In this study we retrospectively analysed our data on Na and P removal in PD patients after implementation of a routine monitoring in 2011. Patients were stratified in those treated with continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD, n=24), automated PD (APD, n=23) and APD with one bag change (CAPD+APD, n=10). Until 2015 we collected time-varying data on Na and P removal from each patient (median 5 [interquartile range 4-8] values). RESULTS: Peritoneal Na and P removal (mmol per 24h ± standard deviation) was 102 ± 48 and 8 ± 2 in the CAPD, 90 ± 46 and 9 ± 3 in the APD and 126 ± 39 and 13 ± 2 in the CAPD+APD group (ANOVA P=0.141 and <0.001). Taking renal excretion into account total Na and P removal (mmol per 24h) was 221 ± 65 and 16 ± 5 in the CAPD, 189 ± 58 and 17 ± 6 in the APD and 183 ± 38 and 16 ± 6 in the CAPD+APD group (P=0.107 and 0.764). Over time, peritoneal removal of Na but not that of P increased in all groups. In patients with modifications of PD treatment, Na but not P removal was significantly increased over-time. CONCLUSIONS: Overall Na and P removal were similar with different PD modalities. Individualized adjustments of PD prescription including icodextrin use or higher glucose concentration can improve Na removal while P removal is mainly determined by the dialysate volume.

Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis: Kt/V revisited.

OBJECTIVE: Kt/V urea has been used to assess adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. However, Kt/V urea only reflects the clearance of solute without taking into consideration the effects of dietary protein intake (DPI). The objective of this study is to evaluate the value of Kt/V based on nitrogen balance and to observe if it is the best adequacy index. METHODS: On the premise that nitrogen balance is obtained, we calculated the minimal adequate dialysate volume and dialysis index (DI), Kt/V and solute removal index (SRI). We compared the values of DI, Kt/V and SRI to evaluate the adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. RESULTS: Kt/V was changed with DPI and body weight of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. We cannot define adequate dialysis with a single value while DPI and body weight are different since CAPD, SRI and Kt/V are numerically equal. However, dialysis index (DI) can reflect the minimal adequate dialysate volume when DPI and body weight are different and, thus, reflects the adequacy of dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: DI reflects the balance between DPI and solute clearance; thus, it is more useful to evaluate dialysis adequacy than Kt/V and SRI in clinically stable peritoneal dialysis patients.

The use of a tablet computer platform to optimize the care of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) affords patients increased independence and improved quality of life. However, the lack of more frequent monitoring may compromise outcomes and decrease wider uptake of this modality. This study uses a novel tablet computer-based interface to allow real-time monitoring and two-way communication to better link PD patients with a dialysis center and care providers. METHODS: A tablet computer with an application that allows enhanced monitoring of all aspects of PD was given to patients to assess their usage in a pilot trial. The interface allows patients to review sterility techniques, enter vital signs and exchange data, upload media such as photos and video clips, synchronize data to be viewed by medical staff, and allow real-time adjustments to the PD prescription. Satisfaction with the interface and comments for enhancement were analyzed using a simple self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Six continuous ambulatory PD patients were enrolled in this pilot study. A total number of 1,172 exchanges were recorded over a period of 251 days. Compliance with the applications ranged from 51 to 92%. No major adverse events were recorded. The overall impression of the interface was 5.2 out of 10. The major criticism was that the application needs to be adjusted depending upon the experience level of the patient and that data entry needs to be simplified and automated. CONCLUSION: A tablet computer platform is a feasible concept for continuous ambulatory PD. The major components include flexibility, advanced infrastructure, two-way communication, and real-time interaction. This may encourage more patients to take up PD as their preferred modality of therapy for end-stage renal disease. Modifications to enhance use will be incorporated in subsequent versions.

Role of a center of excellence program in improving the quality of peritoneal dialysis--a Chinese experience.

Improving the quality of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in areas with a rapid increase in PD patient numbers constitutes the most significant PD challenge in China. Here, we share our experience of implementing a quality improvement program in 8 PD centers, with guidance from matched experienced centers.

Standard continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis therapy provides similar initial T-Kt/V regardless of the patient's peritoneal membrane transporter category: Single-center experience.

Patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) are routinely evaluated using the peritoneal equilibrium test (PET) to determine the best method for achieving target total dialysis clearance (T-Kt/V). In this study, we tested the hypothesis that standard CAPD prescription would achieve an initial T-Kt/V of more than 1.7 in all the patients regardless of their PET measurements. This is a retrospective study that included patients who started standard CAPD of four two-liter exchanges per day. The study included 118 patients; their mean age was 51.5 years with a standard deviation (SD) of 14.39 years. There were 83 males (70.3%) and 35 females (29.7%). PET and Kt/V were performed during the first four to six weeks of the study. The PET classified the patients into four categories: 24 (20.3%), high transporters; 65 (55.1%), high average; 28 (23.7%), low average; and one (0.8%), low transporter. Patients were then divided in two groups: Group 1 comprised of the high transporters while Group 2 included all the other patients. The T-Kt/V of the two groups was similar; in Group 1, it was 2.57 (± 1.17) and in Group 2 it was 2.50 (± 0.88) (P = 0.77). The T-Kt/V of patients with no residual renal function was also similar; in Group 1 and Group 2 it was 1.8 (± 0.29) and 1.97 (± 0.56), respectively (P = 0.45). All patients in our study who started on standard CAPD treatment had an adequate initial T-Kt/V. Thus, our data demonstrate that all patients with end-stage renal disease can safely begin standard CAPD without PET, which only needs to be performed if the patient encounters trouble in his/her T-Kt/V or fluid removal.

Glycosylated hemoglobin and albumin-corrected fructosamine are good indicators for glycemic control in peritoneal dialysis patients.

PURPOSE: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease and is an important risk factor for morbidity and mortality after dialysis. However, glycemic control among such patients is difficult to assess. The present study examined glycemic control parameters and observed glucose variation after refilling different kinds of fresh dialysate in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. METHODS: A total of 25 DM PD patients were recruited, and continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) was applied to measure interstitial fluid (ISF) glucose levels at 5-min intervals for 3 days. Patients filled out diet and PD fluid exchange diaries. The records measured with CGMS were analyzed and correlated with other glycemic control parameters such as fructosamine, albumin-corrected fructosamine (AlbF), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and glycated albumin levels. RESULTS: There were significant correlations between mean ISF glucose and fructosamine (r = 0.45, P<0.05), AlbF (r = 0.54, P<0.01), and HbA1c (r = 0.51, P<0.01). The ISF glucose levels in glucose-containing dialysate increased from approximately 7-8 mg/dL within 1 hour of exchange in contrast to icodextrin dialysate which kept ISF glucose levels unchanged. CONCLUSION: HbA1c and AlbF significantly correlated with the mean ISF glucose levels, indicating that they are reliable indices of glycemic control in DM PD patients. Icodextrin dialysate seems to have a favorable glycemic control effect when compared to the other glucose-containing dialysates.

A reference equation for objectively adjusting dwell volume to obtain more ultrafiltration in daily practice of peritoneal dialysis.

OBJECTIVES: Few studies mention how to objectively adjust peritoneal dialysis (PD) dwell volume for adult continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. We proposed a reference equation composed of parameters from the peritoneal equilibrium test (PET) for adjusting daily dialysate dwell volume to obtain more ultrafiltration volume. Better fluid control could reduce more fluid overload-related complications. DESIGN: We used body mass index, waist circumference, intraperitoneal pressure, and other parameters from peritoneal equilibrium test to compose a reference equation for fine-tuning daily dwell volume. PATIENTS AND SETTING: Eighty-eight PD patients in one center with laboratory data collected during half-yearly PET evaluations were enrolled. Instilled dialysate was composed of 2.57% glucose PD fluid, either 1500 ml or 2000 ml in volume. In addition to other demographic data, intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) was also measured twice in the supine position four hours apart. We applied statistical multivariate techniques of discrimination analysis and logistic regression to verify the most feasible and optimal formula to determine infill volumes for patients. RESULTS: We determined a novel formula for calculating daily dialysate dwell volume, Z: Z = (0.523 x waist circumference) + (0.852 x body mass index), derived from rotating axes to obtain an accurate prediction rate of 80.68% using the multivariate approach. CONCLUSION: The novel formula used objective, real-time parameters for determining appropriate dwell volumes for PD patients to optimize maximal ultrafiltration volumes and reduce subjective abdominal discomfort. The novel formula makes frequent adjustment of daily dwell volume by physicians or patients easy to calculate.

Learning about the practice of peritoneal dialysis.

Observational studies are valuable and provocative. We are learning about how we practice peritoneal dialysis (PD) and how we might improve on that practice. For example, outcomes of PD therapy are not worse in large patients. Perhaps this will encourage physicians and patients to utilize PD in large patients. In addition, better descriptions of how we practice will help to identify systematic barriers to the advancement of home dialysis.

The status of, and obstacles to, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Thailand.

The prevalence of dialysis in Thailand is 282 per million population, and utilization of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is only 4.6% of the utilization of hemodialysis (HD). The causes of low PD utilization include a relatively higher cost of PD care, especially from the patient's perspective; less incentive for PD care on the part of health care providers and hospitals; fewer continuing medical and nursing education programs in PD; unavailability of certified PD nurses; lack of confidence in the quality of PD care; fewer offers of PD as a renal replacement therapy option during pre-dialysis counseling; fear of peritonitis on the part of the patient, and also fear of burdening family members; a less stringent government policy regarding the "PD first" strategy. To increase PD utilization. mandatory strategies are lower PD cost, make all PD equipment reimbursable, launch a stringent "PD first" policy, provide incentives to health care providers and hospitals, and improve the quality of PD care.

Improving outcome of CAPD: twenty-five years' experience in a single Korean center.

BACKGROUND: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is an established treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We investigated the outcome of CAPD over a period of 25 years at our institution. METHODS: CAPD has been performed in 2301 patients in 25 years. After excluding patients with less than 3 months of follow-up and missing data, we evaluated 1656 patients who started peritoneal dialysis between November 1981 and December 2005. Data for sex, age, primary disease, comorbidities, follow-up duration, cause of death, and cause of technique failure were collected. We also examined data for urea kinetic modeling (UKM), beginning in 1990, and peritonitis episodes, including causative organisms, starting in 1992. RESULTS: Compared to incident patients from 1981-1992, mean age and incidence of ESRD caused by diabetic nephropathy increased in patients from 1993 to 2005. Technique survival after 5 and 10 years was 71.9% and 48.1% respectively. Technique survival was significantly higher in patients who started CAPD after 1992 than in those who started before 1992. Peritonitis was the main reason for technique failure. Overall peritonitis rate was 0.38 episodes per patient-year, with a significant downward trend to 0.29 per patient-year over 10 years, corresponding to a decrease in gram-positive peritonitis. Patient survival after 5 and 10 years was 69.8% and 51.8% respectively. Patient survival improved significantly during 1992-2005 compared to 1981-1992 after adjustment for age, gender, diabetes, and cardiovascular comorbidities [hazard ratio (HR) 0.68, p < 0.01]. Subgroup analysis based on UKM revealed that dialysis adequacy did not affect patient survival. However, diabetes (HR 2.78, p < 0.001), older age (per 1 year: HR 1.06; p < 0.001), serum albumin level (per 1 g/dL: increase, HR 0.52; p < 0.05), and cardiovascular comorbidities (HR 2.32, p < 0.01) were identified as significant risk factors. CONCLUSION: Technique survival has improved due partly to a decrease in peritonitis, which was attributed to a decrease in gram-positive peritonitis. Patient survival has also improved considering increases in aged patients and ESRD caused by diabetes. The mortality rate of CAPD is still high in older, diabetic, malnourished, and cardiovascular diseased patients. A more careful management of higher risk groups will be needed to improve the outcome of CAPD patients in the future.

An integrative description of dialysis adequacy indices for different treatment modalities and schedules of dialysis.

Dialysis adequacy indices that are applied for the evaluation of the efficiency of urea removal include fractional water volume cleared from urea during dialysis (KT T/V), fractional solute removal (FSR), and equivalent urea clearance (EKR). Using a constant-volume, one-compartment urea kinetic model for an anuric patient, the FSR and EKR are shown to depend on only three nondimensional parameters: (i) KT/V, where K is the dialyzer clearance for hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal mass transport coefficient for peritoneal dialysis (PD), T is the time period of dialysis, and V is urea distribution volume; (ii) T/Tc, where Tc is the length of treatment cycle; and (iii) VD/V, where VD is the volume of dialysis fluid applied. In particular, analytical formulas for FSR and EKR, valid for HD as well as for PD, were derived as functions of these three parameters. Numerical simulations, performed using a two-compartment urea kinetic model, showed that the analytical formulas are valid also for the two-compartment model, except for short, highly effective HD, where the overestimation of FSR and EKR using the analytical formulas is however, not higher than 20 and 16%, respectively. KT T/V is equal to KT/V for HD and FSR for PD. Thus, our formulas provide an integrative description of the relationships between dialysis efficiency indices and operational dialysis parameters that is valid for all modalities and schedules of dialysis. They may be applied not only for standard HD and continuous ambulatory PD, but also for HD with circulating dialysis fluid or intermittent forms of PD.

Establishing a successful home dialysis program.

The renewed interest in home dialysis therapies makes it pertinent to address the essentials of establishing and running a successful home dialysis program. The success of a home program depends on a clear understanding of the structure of the home program team, the physical plant, educational tool requirements, reimbursement sources and a business plan. A good command of the technical and economic aspects is important, but the primary drivers for the creation and growth of a home dialysis program are the confidence and commitment of the nephrological team.

Dialysis adequacy indices for peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.

Dialysis adequacy indices that may be used to evaluate the efficiency of small-solute removal include Kt/V, fractional solute removal (FSR), and equivalent urea clearance (EKR). To analyze possible relationships between those indices, we used the two-compartment variable-volume urea kinetic model to simulate several dialysis modalities: hemodialysis (HD) performed three times or six times weekly, automatic nightly peritoneal dialysis (PD), and continuous ambulatory PD. Instead of targeting a chosen Kt/V value, we selected a weekly FSR of 1.81 as the target adequacy index. We determined hemodialyzer clearances and diffusive mass transport parameters for the peritoneal membrane that yielded the desired value of FSR for a typical patient and dialysis schedule. By theoretic analysis, EKR and FSR are proportional: EKR/FSR = V/Tc, where V = urea distribution volume in the body and Tc = time of the dialysis cycle, usually 1 week. Thus, FSR and EKR have the same meaning and scaling in PD and HD, and may be equivalently applied for assessment of dialysis efficacy.