Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.361
Filter
1.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 155(6): 3589-3599, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38829154

ABSTRACT

Frequency importance functions (FIFs) for simulated bimodal hearing were derived using sentence perception scores measured in quiet and noise. Acoustic hearing was simulated using low-pass filtering. Electric hearing was simulated using a six-channel vocoder with three input frequency ranges, resulting in overlap, meet, and gap maps, relative to the acoustic cutoff frequency. Spectral holes present in the speech spectra were created within electric stimulation by setting amplitude(s) of channels to zero. FIFs were significantly different between frequency maps. In quiet, the three FIFs were similar with gradually increasing weights with channels 5 and 6 compared to the first three channels. However, the most and least weighted channels slightly varied depending on the maps. In noise, the patterns of the three FIFs were similar to those in quiet, with steeper increasing weights with channels 5 and 6 compared to the first four channels. Thus, channels 5 and 6 contributed to speech perception the most, while channels 1 and 2 contributed the least, regardless of frequency maps. Results suggest that the contribution of cochlear implant frequency bands for bimodal speech perception depends on the degree of frequency overlap between acoustic and electric stimulation and if noise is absent or present.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation , Noise , Speech Perception , Humans , Noise/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Perceptual Masking , Adult
2.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241260029, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831646

ABSTRACT

The extent to which active noise cancelation (ANC), when combined with hearing assistance, can improve speech intelligibility in noise is not well understood. One possible source of benefit is ANC's ability to reduce the sound level of the direct (i.e., vent-transmitted) path. This reduction lowers the "floor" imposed by the direct path, thereby allowing any increases to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) created in the amplified path to be "realized" at the eardrum. Here we used a modeling approach to estimate this benefit. We compared pairs of simulated hearing aids that differ only in terms of their ability to provide ANC and computed intelligibility metrics on their outputs. The difference in metric scores between simulated devices is termed the "ANC Benefit." These simulations show that ANC Benefit increases as (1) the environmental sound level increases, (2) the ability of the hearing aid to improve SNR increases, (3) the strength of the ANC increases, and (4) the hearing loss severity decreases. The predicted size of the ANC Benefit can be substantial. For a moderate hearing loss, the model predicts improvement in intelligibility metrics of >30% when environments are moderately loud (>70 dB SPL) and devices are moderately capable of increasing SNR (by >4 dB). It appears that ANC can be a critical ingredient in hearing devices that attempt to improve SNR in loud environments. ANC will become more and more important as advanced SNR-improving algorithms (e.g., artificial intelligence speech enhancement) are included in hearing devices.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Noise , Perceptual Masking , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Perception , Humans , Noise/adverse effects , Computer Simulation , Acoustic Stimulation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Equipment Design , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
3.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241253653, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715401

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to preliminarily investigate the associations between performance on the integrated Digit-in-Noise Test (iDIN) and performance on measures of general cognition and working memory (WM). The study recruited 81 older adult hearing aid users between 60 and 95 years of age with bilateral moderate to severe hearing loss. The Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic (MoCA-BC) was used to screen older adults for mild cognitive impairment. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured using 2- to 5-digit sequences of the Mandarin iDIN. The differences in SRT between five-digit and two-digit sequences (SRT5-2), and between five-digit and three-digit sequences (SRT5-3), were used as indicators of memory performance. The results were compared to those from the Digit Span Test and Corsi Blocks Tapping Test, which evaluate WM and attention capacity. SRT5-2 and SRT5-3 demonstrated significant correlations with the three cognitive function tests (rs ranging from -.705 to -.528). Furthermore, SRT5-2 and SRT5-3 were significantly higher in participants who failed the MoCA-BC screening compared to those who passed. The findings show associations between performance on the iDIN and performance on memory tests. However, further validation and exploration are needed to fully establish its effectiveness and efficacy.


Subject(s)
Cognition , Cognitive Dysfunction , Hearing Aids , Memory, Short-Term , Humans , Aged , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Noise/adverse effects , Speech Perception/physiology , Speech Reception Threshold Test , Age Factors , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/psychology , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Memory , Acoustic Stimulation , Predictive Value of Tests , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Auditory Threshold
4.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241248973, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717441

ABSTRACT

To preserve residual hearing during cochlear implant (CI) surgery it is desirable to use intraoperative monitoring of inner ear function (cochlear monitoring). A promising method is electrocochleography (ECochG). Within this project the relations between intracochlear ECochG recordings, position of the recording contact in the cochlea with respect to anatomy and frequency and preservation of residual hearing were investigated. The aim was to better understand the changes in ECochG signals and whether these are due to the electrode position in the cochlea or to trauma generated during insertion. During and after insertion of hearing preservation electrodes, intraoperative ECochG recordings were performed using the CI electrode (MED-EL). During insertion, the recordings were performed at discrete insertion steps on electrode contact 1. After insertion as well as postoperatively the recordings were performed at different electrode contacts. The electrode location in the cochlea during insertion was estimated by mathematical models using preoperative clinical imaging, the postoperative location was measured using postoperative clinical imaging. The recordings were analyzed from six adult CI recipients. In the four patients with good residual hearing in the low frequencies the signal amplitude rose with largest amplitudes being recorded closest to the generators of the stimulation frequency, while in both cases with severe pantonal hearing losses the amplitude initially rose and then dropped. This might be due to various reasons as discussed in the following. Our results indicate that this approach can provide valuable information for the interpretation of intracochlearly recorded ECochG signals.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Evoked Response , Cochlea , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Cochlea/surgery , Cochlea/physiology , Cochlea/physiopathology , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Audiometry, Evoked Response/methods , Middle Aged , Aged , Male , Female , Hearing/physiology , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Predictive Value of Tests , Electric Stimulation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Auditory Threshold/physiology
5.
CBE Life Sci Educ ; 23(2): ar22, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709798

ABSTRACT

In recent years, an increasing number of deaf and hard of hearing (D/HH) undergraduates have chosen to study in STEM fields and pursue careers in research. Yet, very little research has been undertaken on the barriers and inclusive experiences often faced by D/HH undergraduates who prefer to use spoken English in research settings, instead of American Sign Language (ASL). To identify barriers and inclusive strategies, we studied six English speaking D/HH undergraduate students working in research laboratories with their eight hearing mentors, and their three hearing peers sharing their experiences. Three researchers observed the interactions between all three groups and conducted interviews and focus groups, along with utilizing the Communication Assessment Self-Rating Scale (CASS). The main themes identified in the findings were communication and environmental barriers in research laboratories, creating accessible and inclusive laboratory environments, communication strategies, and self-advocating for effective communication. Recommendations for mentors include understanding the key elements of creating an inclusive laboratory environment for English speaking D/HH students and effectively demonstrating cultural competence to engage in inclusive practices.


Subject(s)
Students , Humans , Deafness , Male , Female , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Research , Sign Language , Mentors , Language , Communication , Communication Barriers
6.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241256721, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773778

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to investigate the role of hearing aid (HA) usage in language outcomes among preschool children aged 3-5 years with mild bilateral hearing loss (MBHL). The data were retrieved from a total of 52 children with MBHL and 30 children with normal hearing (NH). The association between demographical, audiological factors and language outcomes was examined. Analyses of variance were conducted to compare the language abilities of HA users, non-HA users, and their NH peers. Furthermore, regression analyses were performed to identify significant predictors of language outcomes. Aided better ear pure-tone average (BEPTA) was significantly correlated with language comprehension scores. Among children with MBHL, those who used HA outperformed the ones who did not use HA across all linguistic domains. The language skills of children with MBHL were comparable to those of their peers with NH. The degree of improvement in audibility in terms of aided BEPTA was a significant predictor of language comprehension. It is noteworthy that 50% of the parents expressed reluctance regarding HA use for their children with MBHL. The findings highlight the positive impact of HA usage on language development in this population. Professionals may therefore consider HAs as a viable treatment option for children with MBHL, especially when there is a potential risk of language delay due to hearing loss. It was observed that 25% of the children with MBHL had late-onset hearing loss. Consequently, the implementation of preschool screening or a listening performance checklist is recommended to facilitate early detection.


Subject(s)
Child Language , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Bilateral , Language Development , Humans , Male , Child, Preschool , Female , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/psychology , Speech Perception , Case-Control Studies , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Severity of Illness Index , Comprehension , Hearing , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Age Factors , Auditory Threshold , Language Tests
8.
Am Ann Deaf ; 168(5): 258-273, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766938

ABSTRACT

Little information is available on d/Deaf and hard of hearing (d/DHH) learners' L2 development. Their limited auditory access may discourage them from taking standardized tests, highlighting the need for alternative ways of assessing their L2 development and proficiency. Therefore, this study suggests adopting processability theory, which demonstrates a universal order of L2 development. Interviews with d/DHH learners and their teachers were conducted to explore their current difficulties in regard to understanding their L2 development. Also, we conducted brief speaking tasks to suggest alternatives to testing the L2 development of learners who are d/DHH in comparison to typical literacy learners. The result showed d/DHH students' L2 developmental patterns are similar to those of typical hearing peers, suggesting that d/DHH students and hearing learners share difficulties in similar areas when learning English. Teachers highlighted the lack of appropriate English tests to determine the d/DHH students' L2 development.


Subject(s)
Education of Hearing Disabled , Multilingualism , Humans , Education of Hearing Disabled/methods , Female , Male , Adolescent , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Students/psychology , Child , Language Tests , Deafness/psychology , Language Development , Comprehension
9.
Am Ann Deaf ; 168(5): 274-295, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766939

ABSTRACT

Extant research on learners who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing with disabilities who come from Asian immigrant families is extremely sparse. The authors conducted an intrinsic case study of a deaf student with autism who comes from a Korean immigrant family. To acquire a comprehensive understanding of language and communication characteristics, they analyzed (a) interview data of three administrators who worked with the student and family and (b) school documents/reports issued to the parents. Themes are reported across the three components of the tri-focus framework (Siegel-Causey & Bashinski, 1997): the learner, partner, and environment. Implications for practitioners who work with these learners and their families are discussed, including (a) compiling an individualized language and communication profile that encompasses the framework; (b) utilizing culturally and linguistically responsive practices with the family; (c) practicing interprofessional collaboration; and (d) modifying physical and social environments to increase accessibility.


Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder , Deafness , Emigrants and Immigrants , Humans , Autism Spectrum Disorder/psychology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/ethnology , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/ethnology , Male , Communication , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Education of Hearing Disabled , Child , Republic of Korea , Female , Communication Barriers , Sign Language , Social Environment , Language
10.
Am Ann Deaf ; 168(5): 296-310, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766940

ABSTRACT

This article describes the current landscape of teaching literacy to Filipino Deaf students in a multilingual, multi-cultural classroom amid the pandemic. The article highlights the uniqueness of Filipino Deaf students as multilingual learners in a multi-cultural classroom and the lack of literature and research on Deaf multilingualism both locally and globally. Moreover, the article focuses on the role of Deaf teachers in teaching Filipino Deaf students, especially in their literacy development. The steps being done to ensure that the curriculum is inclusive of Deaf learners who use Filipino Sign Language (FSL), teacher preparation and materials development, and the challenges in the shift to distance learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic are also discussed. Future directions and recommendations include review of curriculum and adaptation, enhancement of teacher preparation, promotion of collaborative teaching and research efforts, and the production of more appropriate and accessible instructional materials for Deaf students.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Curriculum , Education of Hearing Disabled , Literacy , Multilingualism , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Sign Language , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Philippines/ethnology , Education of Hearing Disabled/methods , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Deafness/psychology , SARS-CoV-2 , Child , Education, Distance , Pandemics , Students/psychology
11.
Am Ann Deaf ; 168(5): 311-326, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766941

ABSTRACT

In this article, we visualize a framework of the intersectionality of literacy, spatial justice, and multimodality in teaching literacy to Filipino Deaf students. We propose a metaphor-based framework and discuss how it can be used in teaching literacy to Filipino Deaf students through classroom examples as well as suggestions and recommendations for teachers. We do this mainly through redefining the term literacy, allowing students access to different modalities, and restructuring learning spaces. We also explore the relationship between spatial justice and the concept of Deaf Space and how this applies in the "new normal" of online learning due to the pandemic. We also address the issue of how classroom and education structure may inadvertently produce spatial injustice, especially for Deaf students. Implications and additional questions in teaching Filipino Deaf students are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Education of Hearing Disabled , Literacy , Humans , Philippines , Education of Hearing Disabled/methods , Deafness/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Education, Distance , Teaching , Social Justice , Curriculum , Child , Students/psychology
12.
Am Ann Deaf ; 168(5): 327-346, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766942

ABSTRACT

This single case study concerns an 11-year-old girl, Agata, who recently moved to a rural community in the United States from the Philippines. Agata is profoundly deaf, has had no access to amplification, and has had very limited access to language and formal school. The journey through the next year, including the COVID-19 pandemic, saw Agata's language and literacy skills blossom at an unexpected rate. The study examines the how and why of Agata's progress by using multiple sources of both quantitative and qualitative data. A conceptual framework of both direct instruction theory (Engelmann & Carnine, 1982) and resilience theory (Garmezy, 1993) was used to systematically analyze the factors that contributed to Agata's growth and offer a more thorough understanding of the complex challenges and potential successes in supporting students from Asian communities who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing (d/DHH).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education of Hearing Disabled , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Humans , Child , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/psychology , Philippines/ethnology , Learning , SARS-CoV-2 , United States , Resilience, Psychological
14.
Hear Res ; 447: 109023, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733710

ABSTRACT

Limited auditory input, whether caused by hearing loss or by electrical stimulation through a cochlear implant (CI), can be compensated by the remaining senses. Specifically for CI users, previous studies reported not only improved visual skills, but also altered cortical processing of unisensory visual and auditory stimuli. However, in multisensory scenarios, it is still unclear how auditory deprivation (before implantation) and electrical hearing experience (after implantation) affect cortical audiovisual speech processing. Here, we present a prospective longitudinal electroencephalography (EEG) study which systematically examined the deprivation- and CI-induced alterations of cortical processing of audiovisual words by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) in postlingually deafened CI users before and after implantation (five weeks and six months of CI use). A group of matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners served as controls. The participants performed a word-identification task with congruent and incongruent audiovisual words, focusing their attention on either the visual (lip movement) or the auditory speech signal. This allowed us to study the (top-down) attention effect on the (bottom-up) sensory cortical processing of audiovisual speech. When compared to the NH listeners, the CI candidates (before implantation) and the CI users (after implantation) exhibited enhanced lipreading abilities and an altered cortical response at the N1 latency range (90-150 ms) that was characterized by a decreased theta oscillation power (4-8 Hz) and a smaller amplitude in the auditory cortex. After implantation, however, the auditory-cortex response gradually increased and developed a stronger intra-modal connectivity. Nevertheless, task efficiency and activation in the visual cortex was significantly modulated in both groups by focusing attention on the visual as compared to the auditory speech signal, with the NH listeners additionally showing an attention-dependent decrease in beta oscillation power (13-30 Hz). In sum, these results suggest remarkable deprivation effects on audiovisual speech processing in the auditory cortex, which partially reverse after implantation. Although even experienced CI users still show distinct audiovisual speech processing compared to NH listeners, pronounced effects of (top-down) direction of attention on (bottom-up) audiovisual processing can be observed in both groups. However, NH listeners but not CI users appear to show enhanced allocation of cognitive resources in visually as compared to auditory attended audiovisual speech conditions, which supports our behavioural observations of poorer lipreading abilities and reduced visual influence on audition in NH listeners as compared to CI users.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Attention , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Electroencephalography , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Photic Stimulation , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Adult , Prospective Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Aged , Visual Perception , Lipreading , Time Factors , Hearing , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Auditory Cortex/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials
15.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(10)2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793964

ABSTRACT

Deaf and hard-of-hearing people mainly communicate using sign language, which is a set of signs made using hand gestures combined with facial expressions to make meaningful and complete sentences. The problem that faces deaf and hard-of-hearing people is the lack of automatic tools that translate sign languages into written or spoken text, which has led to a communication gap between them and their communities. Most state-of-the-art vision-based sign language recognition approaches focus on translating non-Arabic sign languages, with few targeting the Arabic Sign Language (ArSL) and even fewer targeting the Saudi Sign Language (SSL). This paper proposes a mobile application that helps deaf and hard-of-hearing people in Saudi Arabia to communicate efficiently with their communities. The prototype is an Android-based mobile application that applies deep learning techniques to translate isolated SSL to text and audio and includes unique features that are not available in other related applications targeting ArSL. The proposed approach, when evaluated on a comprehensive dataset, has demonstrated its effectiveness by outperforming several state-of-the-art approaches and producing results that are comparable to these approaches. Moreover, testing the prototype on several deaf and hard-of-hearing users, in addition to hearing users, proved its usefulness. In the future, we aim to improve the accuracy of the model and enrich the application with more features.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Sign Language , Humans , Saudi Arabia , Mobile Applications , Deafness/physiopathology , Persons With Hearing Impairments
16.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0301722, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683866

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Most deaf babies are born to hearing families who do not yet have the skills to communicate effectively with their child. Adaptations to communication are important because the quality of parent-child interaction (PCI) predicts how a deaf child develops language. Teachers of Deaf children and Speech and Language Therapists support families with communication in the home. Currently, there are no assessments that appraise how a parent interacts with their deaf baby. Previous research has identified which parent behaviours and approaches are used in PCI assessments in research and practice. The current paper forms consensus on the core content and best practices of a new PCI tool for deaf children aged 0-3 years. METHODS: An international sample of expert academics and practitioners (n = 83) were recruited to take part in a two-round modified electronic Delphi study. Participants were presented with 69 statements focusing on (i) which parent behaviours were important in assessment (ii) the methods to be used in PCI assessment. Participants rated the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with each statement on a five-point Likert scale and gave comments to support their response. Consensus was defined as >80% of participants rating the statement as a (4) 'highly important' or a (5) 'essential'. If consensus was not reached, participant comments were used to generate new statements which were rated in the second round. This project involved a patient and public involvement (PPI) group of hearing and deaf parents and professionals to design and guide the study. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on 52 statements and ranged from 80-99%. A further six statements were additionally included. Within the 58 statements included, 36 were parent behaviours which centred on the parent's observation of, and response to, their child's behaviour and/or language. The remaining 22 statements focused on methods used in the assessment such as parents having their PCI filmed, parents having the opportunity to review the video and assess themselves alongside a professional, and parents being involved in subsequent goal setting. CONCLUSIONS: This e-Delphi presented the parent behaviours and methods of assessment to be included in a new PCI tool for deaf children. Future co-production work and acceptability and feasibility testing are discussed.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Delphi Technique , Parent-Child Relations , Humans , Infant , Child, Preschool , Deafness/psychology , Female , Male , Infant, Newborn , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Parents/psychology , Adult
17.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 179: 111930, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38579404

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children may experience communication delays, irrespective of early intervention and technology. Australian Sign Language (Auslan) is one approach in early intervention to address language delays. Current prevalence of Auslan use among Australian families with DHH children is unknown. AIMS: The first aim was to determine the proportion of families enrolled in an Australian statewide hearing loss databank who use Auslan with their DHH child. The second aim was to explore the relationships between indicators of child hearing loss (bilateral or unilateral hearing loss, degree of hearing loss, and device use: hearing aids and cochlear implants), family factors (maternal education, attendance at early intervention, family history of deafness, and socio-economic disadvantage) and the family's reported use of Auslan. METHODS: We analysed the enrolment data from 997 families who participated in an Australian statewide hearing loss databank between 2012 and 2021. We described the proportion of families who used Auslan with their DHH child at home. The association between indicators of child hearing loss and family factors, and the parental reports of communication approach were examined using correlation analyses. RESULTS: Eighty-seven of 997 parents (8.7%) reported using Auslan with their DHH child. Of these, 26 (2.6%) used Auslan as their primary language. The use of Auslan at home was associated with the following indicators of child hearing loss: bilateral hearing loss, profound compared to mild hearing loss, and cochlear implant and hearing aid use compared to no device use. The family factors associated with the use of Auslan were: referral or attendance at early intervention compared to those who did not attend, and a family history of deafness compared to those with none. No association was found between maternal education and socio-economic disadvantage and the use of Auslan. CONCLUSION: This Australian study found a low proportion (8.7%) of families with a DHH child who reported using Auslan. Seven child hearing loss and family factors were considered, and five were significantly associated with using Auslan at home. Children with a greater degree of hearing loss, attendance at early intervention and family history of deafness tended to use Auslan.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Child , Humans , Deafness/epidemiology , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Australia/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/epidemiology
18.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241240572, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676325

ABSTRACT

Realistic outcome measures that reflect everyday hearing challenges are needed to assess hearing aid and cochlear implant (CI) fitting. Literature suggests that listening effort measures may be more sensitive to differences between hearing-device settings than established speech intelligibility measures when speech intelligibility is near maximum. Which method provides the most effective measurement of listening effort for this purpose is currently unclear. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of two tests for measuring changes in listening effort in CI users due to signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) differences, as would arise from different hearing-device settings. By comparing the effect size of SNR differences on listening effort measures with test-retest differences, the study evaluated the suitability of these tests for clinical use. Nineteen CI users underwent two listening effort tests at two SNRs (+4 and +8 dB relative to individuals' 50% speech perception threshold). We employed dual-task paradigms-a sentence-final word identification and recall test (SWIRT) and a sentence verification test (SVT)-to assess listening effort at these two SNRs. Our results show a significant difference in listening effort between the SNRs for both test methods, although the effect size was comparable to the test-retest difference, and the sensitivity was not superior to speech intelligibility measures. Thus, the implementations of SVT and SWIRT used in this study are not suitable for clinical use to measure listening effort differences of this magnitude in individual CI users. However, they can be used in research involving CI users to analyze group data.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Feasibility Studies , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Female , Speech Perception/physiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Speech Intelligibility/physiology , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Reproducibility of Results , Acoustic Stimulation , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Noise/adverse effects
19.
Hear Res ; 446: 109007, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608331

ABSTRACT

Despite the proven effectiveness of cochlear implant (CI) in the hearing restoration of deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) children, to date, extreme variability in verbal working memory (VWM) abilities is observed in both unilateral and bilateral CI user children (CIs). Although clinical experience has long observed deficits in this fundamental executive function in CIs, the cause to date is still unknown. Here, we have set out to investigate differences in brain functioning regarding the impact of monaural and binaural listening in CIs compared with normal hearing (NH) peers during a three-level difficulty n-back task undertaken in two sensory modalities (auditory and visual). The objective of this pioneering study was to identify electroencephalographic (EEG) marker pattern differences in visual and auditory VWM performances in CIs compared to NH peers and possible differences between unilateral cochlear implant (UCI) and bilateral cochlear implant (BCI) users. The main results revealed differences in theta and gamma EEG bands. Compared with hearing controls and BCIs, UCIs showed hypoactivation of theta in the frontal area during the most complex condition of the auditory task and a correlation of the same activation with VWM performance. Hypoactivation in theta was also observed, again for UCIs, in the left hemisphere when compared to BCIs and in the gamma band in UCIs compared to both BCIs and NHs. For the latter two, a correlation was found between left hemispheric gamma oscillation and performance in the audio task. These findings, discussed in the light of recent research, suggest that unilateral CI is deficient in supporting auditory VWM in DHH. At the same time, bilateral CI would allow the DHH child to approach the VWM benchmark for NH children. The present study suggests the possible effectiveness of EEG in supporting, through a targeted approach, the diagnosis and rehabilitation of VWM in DHH children.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Electroencephalography , Memory, Short-Term , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Visual Perception , Humans , Child , Female , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Male , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Theta Rhythm , Photic Stimulation , Gamma Rhythm , Adolescent , Speech Perception , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/surgery , Hearing
20.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241246616, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656770

ABSTRACT

Negativity bias is a cognitive bias that results in negative events being perceptually more salient than positive ones. For hearing care, this means that hearing aid benefits can potentially be overshadowed by adverse experiences. Research has shown that sustaining focus on positive experiences has the potential to mitigate negativity bias. The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether a positive focus (PF) intervention can improve speech-in-noise abilities for experienced hearing aid users. Thirty participants were randomly allocated to a control or PF group (N = 2 × 15). Prior to hearing aid fitting, all participants filled out the short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12) based on their own hearing aids. At the first visit, they were fitted with study hearing aids, and speech-in-noise testing was performed. Both groups then wore the study hearing aids for two weeks and sent daily text messages reporting hours of hearing aid use to an experimenter. In addition, the PF group was instructed to focus on positive listening experiences and to also report them in the daily text messages. After the 2-week trial, all participants filled out the SSQ12 questionnaire based on the study hearing aids and completed the speech-in-noise testing again. Speech-in-noise performance and SSQ12 Qualities score were improved for the PF group but not for the control group. This finding indicates that the PF intervention can improve subjective and objective hearing aid benefits.


Subject(s)
Correction of Hearing Impairment , Hearing Aids , Noise , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Noise/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Perceptual Masking , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/psychology , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Audiometry, Speech , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged, 80 and over , Time Factors , Acoustic Stimulation , Hearing , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...