Cost-benefit analysis with return on investment of clinical pharmacists in the Military Health System.

BACKGROUND: The Defense Health Agency comprises more than 700 military medical, dental, and veterinary facilities and provides care to more than 9.6 million beneficiaries. As medication experts, pharmacists identify opportunities to optimize medication therapy, reduce cost, and increase readiness to support the Defense Health Agency's mission. The Tripler Pilot Project and the Army Polypharmacy Program were used to establish a staffing model of 1 clinical pharmacist for every 6,500 enrolled beneficiaries. No large-scale cost-benefit study within the military health care system has been done, which documents the number of clinical interventions and uses established cost-avoidance (CA) data, to determine the cost-benefit and return on investment (ROI) for clinical pharmacists working in the medical treatment facilities. OBJECTIVE: To validate the patient-centered medical home staffing model across the military health care system using the Tripler Pilot Project results to provide a cost-benefit analysis with an ROI. The secondary goal is to describe the interventions, staffing levels, and US Department of Defense-specific requirements impacting the provision of clinical pharmacy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 3 years of encounters by clinical pharmacists in which an intervention was documented in the Tri-Service Workflow (TSWF) form as part of the electronic health record was completed. The analysis used 6 steps to assign CA intervention types and to prevent duplication and overestimation of the ROI. The absolute number of clinical pharmacists was determined using workload criteria defined as at least 20 encounters per month for at least 3 months of each calendar year. The number of clinical pharmacist full-time employees (FTEs) was determined by dividing the number of total active months by 12 months. Attrition was calculated comparing the presence of a unique provider identification between calendar years. The ROI range was calculated by dividing the CA by the total cost of clinical pharmacists using the variables' raw and extrapolated CA based on percentage of documentation template usage and the active clinical pharmacist calculation (absolute and FTE-based). RESULTS: Between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019, a total of 1,069,846 encounters by clinical pharmacists were documented in the electronic health record. The TSWF Alternative Input Method form was used by pharmacists to document 616,942 encounters. Forty-three percent of TSWF documented encounters had at least 1 CA intervention. The absolute number of clinical pharmacists associated with a documented encounter in any medical treatment facility ranged from 404 in 2017 to 374 in 2018 and the clinical pharmacist FTEs ranged from 324 in 2017 to 314 in 2019. Annual attrition rates for clinical pharmacists ranged from 15% to 20% (58 to 81 clinical pharmacists) annually. The total CA range was $329,166,543-$534,014,494. The ROI range was between $2 and $4 per dollar spent. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated that ambulatory care clinical pharmacists in the Military Health System bring value through a positive ROI. Our study also identified a potential shortage of clinical pharmacists within the Air Force and Navy branches impacting medication management. This can have a negative impact on the readiness of service members, one of the leading priorities of the US Department of Defense.

Enhancing Drug Management, Cost Savings, and Staff Satisfaction in Anesthesiology: A Quality Improvement Project in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: In alignment with China's national directive for improved drug management in anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University initiated a quality improvement project, aiming to tackle the prevailing challenges of inefficiencies in drug administration, escalating drug costs, and the notable communication gap between pharmacists and anesthesiologists. METHODS: We employed a Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology to establish a pharmacy team and execute a multidimensional pharmaceutical intervention. The interventions included the formulation of standard procedures, guidelines and regulations, assistance from an information system (including automatic dispensing cabinets and prospective prescription review system), communication feedback (via WeChat groups), and education for anesthesiology staff. The intervention spanned from April to September 2023, focusing on optimizing medication management, achieving cost savings, and enhancing the satisfaction of anesthesia team members, with an additional observation from October to December 2023. RESULTS: Following the interventions, improvements were observed in drug management practices. These enhancements included increased compliance with accounting procedures, more rigorous registration of controlled substances, and more effective disposal of liquid residues. There was no adverse events related to high-alert medications or look-alike drug usage errors. The introduction of automatic dispensing cabinets and a prospective prescription review system markedly improved work efficiency. The utilization of a WeChat group facilitated effective communication about unreasonable prescriptions and drug-related issues. Among the 29,061 patients who underwent surgery both before and after the interventions, significant reductions were observed both in the drug proportion and the per capita drug costs (P = 0.03, P = 0.014, respectively). The per capita drug cost decreased by 20.82%, from ¥723.43 to ¥572.78, consistently remaining below ¥600 throughout the 9-month observation period. The per capita cost of monitoring drugs including dezocine, butorphanol, haemocoagulase agkistrodon, penehyclidine, and ulinastatin experienced a significant reduction (P < 0.05). Additionally, in the satisfaction questionnaires returned, a remarkable 94.44% of anesthesiology staff expressed high satisfaction with the comprehensive pharmaceutical interventions. CONCLUSION: The quality improvement project has yielded remarkable positive outcomes, serving as a model worthy of reference and replication in similar healthcare settings.

Impact of selected clinical pharmacy services on medication safety and prescription cost of patients attending a selected primary healthcare setting: a translational experience from a resource-limited country.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The impact of clinical pharmacy (CP) services on primary healthcare (PH) is less well studied in resource-limited countries. We aimed to evaluate the effect of selected CP services on medication safety and prescription cost at a PH setting in Sri Lanka. STUDY DESIGN: Patients attending a PH medical clinic with medications prescribed at the same visit were selected using systematic random sampling. A medication history was obtained and medications were reconciled and reviewed using four standard references. Drug-related problems (DRPs) were identified and categorised, and severities were assessed using the National Coordinating Council Medication Error Reporting and Prevention Index. Acceptance of DRPs by prescribers was assessed. Prescription cost reduction due to CP interventions was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test at 5% significance. RESULTS: Among 150 patients approached, 51 were recruited. Nearly half (58.8%) reported financial difficulties in purchasing medications. DRPs identified were 86. Of them, 13.9% (12 of 86) DRPs were identified when taking a medication history (administration errors (7 of 12); self-prescribing errors (5 of 12)), 2.3% (2 of 86) during reconciliation, and 83.7% (72 of 86) during medication reviewing (wrong indication (18 of 72), wrong strength (14 of 72), wrong frequency (19 of 72), wrong route of administration (2 of 72), duplication (3 of 72), other (16 of 72)). Most DRPs (55.8%) reached the patient, but did not cause harm. Prescribers accepted 65.8% (56 of 86) DRPs identified by researchers. The individual prescription cost reduced significantly due to CP interventions (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing CP services could potentially improve medication safety at a PH level even in resource-limited settings. Prescription cost could be significantly reduced for patients with financial difficulties in consultation with prescribers.

Costs associated with United States pharmacopeia compliant infusion clinics.

PURPOSE: As costs continue to rise in oncology, a strategy that has been implemented to limit these costs is use of alternative sites of care. However, there are differences in regulatory standards between common sites of care such as freestanding infusion clinics and hospital outpatient departments. The costs associated with United States Pharmacopeia compliance were evaluated in order to better understand the cost of universally compliant hospital outpatient departments. METHODS: Annual operational costs associated with United States Pharmacopeia compliance were estimated for a 30-chair infusion clinic with United States Pharmacopeia <797> and <800> pharmacy cleanrooms for non-hazardous and hazardous drugs, respectively. Annual United States Pharmacopeia compliance costs included: competency assessments, personal protective equipment, closed system transfer devices, labels, cleaning supplies, and environmental monitoring. One-time costs included initial cleanroom construction and renovations. Published information and benchmarks provided baseline assumptions for patient volume, staffing, and unit costs. If no published data was available, prices were estimated based on a similarly sized clinic. RESULTS: Recurring annual costs for a 30-chair fully compliant infusion clinic were calculated to be $785,207. One-time costs associated with initial construction and renovations were estimated to be $1,365,207-$1,535,207 and $965,207-$1,005,207, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Costs associated with increased operational oversight and regulatory standards are a major contributing factor to the facility fee of hospital outpatient departments. Ultimately, all sites of care share in the goal to provide optimal patient care while considering all aspects of patient care, including cost. Therefore, a move towards consistent regulatory standards across all settings would aid in preventing discrepancies in care.

How do patients prefer specialized clinical pharmacy service to other prevention of mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus services? An evaluation of their willingness to pay and willingness to accept choices and ratios.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Donor agencies provide most of the funds for HIV services in developing countries. Due to the global economic downturn, there has been a reduction in funding for HIV-related services in Nigeria. This study compared the willingness to pay (WTP)-willingness to accept (WTA) ratios for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) services to specialized clinical pharmacy services among patients of two Nigerian hospitals. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey using contingent valuation method at Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital (ABUTH) and University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH). WTP and WTA were elicited using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and a payment card. The responses to the WTP and WTA questions were reported as frequencies and percentages, while the amounts were determined as mean. All costs were obtained in Nigerian Naira (N360 = $1). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of the 219 mothers who participated in the study, 172 (78.5%) had no health insurance. Primary prevention of HIV (PPV) had the highest "yes" WTP response of 152 (69.4%) and the highest mean WTP amount of N6067.20. It also had the least "no" WTA response of 162 (74.0%) and the least WTA amount of N232.09. Specialized clinical pharmacy service (SCPS) had the highest WTA/WTP ratio of 4.0826 in ABUTH and 9.3750 at UNTH. Its income effect was -3.0826. A 1% increase in income led to 0.0550 (95% CI: -0.3068 to 0.1968) decreased odds to pay for PPV. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Most patients assessed in this study were willing to pay for PPV than other services. Majority of them were also willing to forgo PMTCT Drugs Only. SCPS had the highest value for the patients, but they did not want to pay a high amount for it. Employment status, health insurance status, educational level and age were predictors of patients' WTP and WTA.

Effect of clinical pharmacist interventions on cost in an integrated health system specialty pharmacy.

BACKGROUND: Patients who are prescribed specialty medications require close monitoring, including assessment of laboratory parameters, toxicities, and adherence. Specialty pharmacies integrated within a health system are able to access records, assess therapy, and efficiently communicate with prescribers. OBJECTIVE: To analyze interventions made by clinical pharmacists within the Cleveland Clinic Specialty Pharmacy (CCSP) regarding cost avoidance for the health care system and improvements in patient safety. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study that analyzed pharmacist interventions regarding specialty hematology/oncology medications. Interventions were measured with pharmacist documentation within the electronic health record (EHR). The primary endpoint was the cost-avoidance effect of clinical pharmacist interventions resulting from pharmacist access to the EHR. Secondary endpoints included pharmacist interventions that led to additional ancillary or supportive care, time taken to perform interventions, total interventions according to new or refill status, and total interventions performed according to insurance subtype. RESULTS: 547 interventions were identified during the study period, with a total cost avoidance of $1,508,131. The intervention with the highest overall cost savings was discontinuation of therapy ($290,091). The highest cost savings, based on intervention type, was lack of follow-up ($30,892). The medication with the highest overall cost savings was abiraterone ($273,160). Gilteritinib was associated with the highest cost saving per intervention ($28,350). The indication with the highest overall cost savings was prostate cancer ($402,601), while cutaneous T-cell lymphoma had the highest cost savings per intervention ($25,424). CONCLUSIONS: CCSP pharmacist interventions led to significant overall cost savings to the health care system. Although not measured in this study, it is reasonable to expect that decreased medication use may also translate into less financial burden for patients, as well as for pharmacy benefit managers. Access to the EHR and integration within the health care system may have facilitated the cost savings. DISCLOSURES: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Healthcare failure mode and effects analysis and cost­minimization analysis of three pharmaceutical services.

OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study was to analyze and compare three different medication delivery methods used by the outpatient care unit of a hospital pharmacy, namely health center collection, community pharmacy collection and home delivery. The secondary purpose was to compare the economic cost of those methods for the Spanish health service. METHOD: A failure mode and effects analysis was carried out to attain the primary objective. For the secondary objective, an in-depth analysis  was performed of the economic costs associated with each program using  a cost-minimization analysis. RESULTS: The failure mode and effects analysis resulted in scores of 184, 170 and 126 points for the health center collection, home delivery and community pharmacy collection programs, respectively. The economic evaluation, for its part, rendered estimated costs of €18,434.52, €11,417.08 and €7,986.52 for home delivery, health center collection and community pharmacy collection services, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study indicated that collection at the community pharmacy was the program associated to the lowest risk, most likely due to the crucial role of the pharmacist regarding the custody and preservation of medicines. As regards cost, dispensation at the community pharmacy was also associated with the lowest cost. Nevertheless, this finding was biased by the fact that, given the generous collaboration of pharmaceutical distributors during the COVID-19 pandemic, the cost of transport and delivery to the pharmacy during the study period was zero. Further economic analyses are required to evaluate the costs of community pharmacy delivery and determine their impact on the public health system in cases where transport costs are different from zero.

Objetivo: El objetivo principal fue evaluar y comparar tres programas de entrega de medicamentos requeridos por los pacientes atendidos en las  consultas externas de farmacia hospitalaria: mediante centros de salud,  empresa de mensajería externa y oficinas de farmacia. El objetivo secundario fue analizar el coste económico desde la perspectiva  del sistema público de salud.Método: Se utilizó el análisis modal de fallos y efectos para el objetivo principal. El análisis económico se realizó mediante un estudio de minimización de costes.Resultados: Los resultados en índice de probabilidad de riesgo fueron 184 puntos para la entrega mediante centros de salud, 170 mediante mensajería y 126 mediante oficina de farmacia. El estudio económico mostró que actualmente el programa con menor coste económico fue la dispensación mediante oficina de farmacia respecto a mensajería y centros de salud (7.986,52 € versus 18.434,52 € y 11.417,08 €).Conclusiones: La entrega mediante oficina de farmacia tiene el menor índice de probabilidad de riesgo debido en gran parte al papel del farmacéutico en la custodia y conservación del medicamento. Respecto al estudio económico, también la dispensación mediante oficina de farmacia obtuvo el menor coste pero con una importante limitación: fue asignado un coste cero relativo a la empresa distribuidora y a la entrega del medicamento en las oficinas de farmacia por la colaboración altruista durante la pandemia. Si el coste fuese distinto de cero, serán necesarios nuevos estudios para evaluar el impacto económico el sistema público de salud.

Impact of a prolonged COVID-19 lockdown on patterns of admission, mortality and performance indicators in a cardiovascular intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: The effects of an early and prolonged lockdown during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on cardiovascular intensive care units (CICUs) are not well established. OBJECTIVES: This study analyses patterns of admission, mortality and performance indicators in a CICU before and during the Argentine lockdown in the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cross-sectional study of all consecutive patients aged 18 years or more admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit at a high-volume reference hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina, comparing hospitalization rates, primary causes of admission, inpatient utilization indicators, pharmacy supplies' expenditures and in-hospital mortality between 5 March and 31 July 2020, with two corresponding control periods in 2019 and 2018. RESULTS: We included 722 female patients [mean age of 61.6 (SD 15.5) years; 237 (32.8%)]. Overall hospitalizations dropped 53.2% (95%CI: 45.3, 61.0%), from 295.5 patients/year over the periods 2018/2019 to 137 patients in 2020. Cardiovascular disease-related admissions dropped 59.9%, while admission for non-cardiac causes doubled its prevalence from 9.6% over the periods 2018/2019 to 22.6% in the study period (P < 0.001).In the period 2020, the bed occupancy rate fell from 82.2% to 77.4%, and the bed turnover rate dropped 50% from 7.88 to 3.91 monthly discharges/bed. The average length of stay doubled from 3.26 to 6.75 days, and the turnover interval increased from 3.8 to 8.39 days in 2020.Pharmacy supplies' expenditures per discharge increased 134% along with a rise in antibiotics usage from 6.5 to 11.4 vials/ampoules per discharge (P < 0.02).Overall mortality increased from 7% (n = 41) to 13.9% (n = 19) (P = 0.008) at the expense of non-cardiac-related admissions (3.6-19.4%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a significant reduction in overall and cardiovascular disease-related causes of admission to the cardiac intensive care unit, worse performance indicators and increased in-hospital mortality along the first 5 months of the early and long-lasting COVID-19 lockdown in Argentina. These results highlight the need to foster public awareness concerning the risks of avoiding hospital attendance. Moreover, health systems should follow strict screening protocols to prevent potential biases in the admission of patients with critical conditions unrelated to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Clinical pharmacist interventions in managing Key Monitoring Drugs in China.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are common in hospitalized patients receiving Key Monitoring Drugs. Clinical pharmacy services have the potential to minimize drug-related harm and improve patient care. The aim of this study is to standardize the clinical application of Key Monitoring Drugs and reduce drug-related problems (DRPs) and associated costs, using clinical pharmacist interventions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical pharmacists formulate management measures for Key Monitoring Drugs using evidence-based medicine and analyze the DRPs of Key Monitoring Drugs in China at the Shandong Provincial Third Hospital over a period of five years, from 2015 to 2019. RESULTS: In 2019, the total cost of the use of Key Monitoring Drugs decreased by 10.12 million CNY, in comparison with the cost in 2015. The proportion of revenue generated from Key Monitoring Drugs also decreased by 11.49% compared with 2015. In addition, the cost per capita of Key Monitoring Drugs has gradually decreased; this resulted in a saving of 580.07 CNY per capita in 2019 compared with 2015. Over this time, the DRPs associated with Key Monitoring Drugs decreased by 45.50%. Through administrative intervention, prescription review, information management, and pharmaco-economic evaluation, a scientific management system for Key Monitoring Drugs has been established over this time, which standardizes the use of Key Monitoring Drugs and reduces their associated costs. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical pharmacists' interventions can assist in the early detection of drug-related problems associated with Key Monitoring Drugs and prevent any resulting harm to patients.

Effects of a multifaceted intervention to promote the use of intravenous iron sucrose complex instead of ferric carboxymaltose in patients admitted for more than 24 h.

PURPOSE: Although more practical for use, the impact of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) on the hospital budget is considerable, and intravenous iron sucrose complex (ISC) represents a cost-saving alternative for the management of iron deficiency anemia in patients during hospitalization. The Drug Committee decided to reserve FCM for day hospitalizations and contraindications to ISC, especially allergy. ISC was available for prescription for all other situations. METHODS: The impact of a multifaceted intervention promoting a switch from FCM to ISC was evaluated using an interrupted time series model with segmented regression analysis. The standardized rate of the dispensing of FCM, ISC, and oral iron by the hospital pharmacy, as well as the rate of the dispensing of packed red blood cells and the number of biological iron status measurements, was analyzed before and after the intervention. RESULTS: There was an immediate decrease in FCM consumption following the intervention, with a reduction of 88% (RR: 0.12 [CI95% 0.10 to 0.15]). Conversely, there was a large increase in ISC use (RR: 5.1 [CI95% 4.4 to 5.9]). We did not observe a prescription shift to packed red blood cells or oral iron after the intervention. The time series analysis showed the frequency of iron status testing to remain stable before and after. The direct savings for intravenous iron for 8 months were 187,417.54 €. CONCLUSION: Our intervention to lower the impact of intravenous iron therapy on the hospital budget was effective.

Effect of pharmacist interventions on antibiotic use in the general pediatric ward.

Antibiotics are widely prescribed and often used irrationally in Chinese hospitals. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacist's influence on antibiotic use in the pediatric ward. We conducted this pre-to-post intervention study in the pediatrics of a Chinese tertiary hospital. The patients hospitalized from April to June 2018 were assigned to the pre-intervention group and those from April to June 2019 were distributed to post-intervention group. In the post-intervention stage, the pharmacist took measures to promote rational use of antibiotics and their effects were assessed. This study analyzed data of 1408 patients totally, 671 and 737 in the pre-intervention and post-intervention group respectively. The interventions of clinical pharmacist significantly reduced the rate of using antibiotics without indications (from 33.55% to 15.82%, p<0.01), percentage of inappropriate antibiotic choice (from 24.79% to 16.58%, p p<0.01), dose (from 8.55% to 4.34%, p p<0.05), combination (from 11.75% to 5.10%, p p<0.01) and prolonged duration (from 14.53% to 10.46%, p p<0.05). The mean antibiotic cost and cost/patient-day were also significantly reduced after the intervention. The ratio of average antibiotic cost saving to pharmacist time cost was 16.77:1. The pharmacist could play vital roles in optimizing antibiotic use, thus resulting in favorable clinical and economic outcomes in pediatric ward.

Cost-benefit analysis of pharmacist interventions over 36 months in a university hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-benefits analysis of a clinical pharmacy (CP) service implemented in a Neurology ward of a tertiary teaching hospital. METHODS: This is a cost-benefit analysis of a single arm, prospective cohort study performed at the adult Neurology Unit over 36 months, which has evaluated the results of a CP service from a hospital and Public Health System (PHS) perspective. The interventions were classified into 14 categories and the costs identified as direct medical costs. The results were analyzed by the total and marginal cost, the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) and the net benefit (NB). RESULTS: The total 334 patients were followed-up and the highest occurrence in 506 interventions was drug introduction (29.0%). The marginal cost for the hospital and avoided cost for PHS was US$182±32 and US$25,536±4,923 per year; and US$0.55 and US$76.4 per patient/year. The BCR and NB were 0.0, -US$26,105 (95%CI -31,850 - -10,610), -US$27,112 (95%CI -33,160-11,720) for the hospital and; 3.0 (95%CI 1.97-4.94), US$51,048 (95%CI 27,645-75,716) and, 4.6 (95%CI 2.24-10.05), US$91,496 (95%CI 34,700-168,050; p < 0.001) for the PHS, both considering adhered and total interventions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CP service was not directly cost-benefit at the hospital perspective, but it presented savings for forecast cost related to the occurrence of preventable morbidities, measuring a good cost-benefit for the PHS.

Safety, time and cost evaluation of automated and semi-automated drug distribution systems in hospitals: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review automated and semi-automated drug distribution systems (DDSs) in hospitals and to evaluate their effectiveness on medication safety, time and costs of medication care. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE Ovid, Scopus, CINAHL and EMB Reviews covering the period 2005 to May 2016. Studies were included if they (1) concerned technologies used in the drug distribution and administration process in acute care hospitals and (2) reported medication safety, time and cost-related outcomes. RESULTS: Key outcomes, conclusions and recommendations of the included studies (n=30) were categorised according to the dispensing method: decentralised (n=19 studies), centralised (n=6) or hybrid system (n=5). Patient safety improved (n=27) with automation, and reduction in medication errors was found in all three systems. Centralised and decentralised systems were reported to support clinical pharmacy practice in hospitals. The impact of the medication distribution system on time allocation such as labour time, staffing workload or changes in work process was explored in the majority of studies (n=24). Six studies explored economic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: No medication distribution system was found to be better than another in terms of outcomes assessed in the studies included in the systematic review. All DDSs improved medication safety and quality of care, mainly by decreasing medication errors. However, many error types still remained-for example, prescribing errors. Centralised and hybrid systems saved more time than a decentralised system. Costs of medication care were reduced in decentralised systems mainly in high-expense units. However, no evidence was shown that implementation of decentralised systems in small units would save costs. More comparable evidence on the benefits and costs of decentralised and hybrid systems should be available. Changes in processes due to a new DDS may create new medication safety risks; to minimise these risks, training and reallocation of staff resources are needed.

Redistribution of short-dated emergency medications as a cost avoidance and drug shortage management strategy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a process to reduce waste through redistribution of short-dated medications in emergency drug boxes and assess associated cost avoidance. METHODS: Short-dated medication items (defined as those expiring within 4 months) from more than 200 emergency drug boxes located throughout a large academic medical center were collected, sorted, and counted during two 3-month time periods. Medications expiring within 2 weeks were discarded. Remaining short-dated medications were redistributed to satellite pharmacies and the emergency department based on historical utilization patterns. The counts and costs of redistributed medications were collected and totaled. Results were compared between study periods to assess differences in numbers of drugs redistributed and the associated cost avoidance. RESULTS: A total of 4,415 short-dated medication items were collected during the study periods. The medication items associated with the highest cost avoidance were epinephrine 1 mg/mL, 30-mL vial (cost avoidance of $25,764), phenylephrine 10 mg/mL, 1-mL vial (cost avoidance of $8,626), and naloxone 0.4 mg/mL, 1-mL vial (cost avoidance of $5,382). The estimated total annualized cost avoidance was $104,357 for the first period and $144,674 for the second period. Of the 16 unique medications stocked in emergency drug boxes, 12 were in short supply at the institution at the time of the project, and about 67% of the redistributed items were subject to national drug shortages. CONCLUSION: A process that facilitates appropriate redistribution of short-dated emergency drug box medications can reduce medication waste and lead to substantial cost avoidance.

Rational drug use in hospital settings - areas that can be changed.

Irrational use of drugs occurs at all levels of healthcare. This phenomenon can also be observed in hospitals. Irrational use of a drug contributes to a decrease in the patient's quality of treatment and often causes negative health consequences. For this reason, it is essential to consider methods that can be introduced in hospitals to increase the safety and effectiveness of the drugs used. The article presents selected methods of rationalization of drug management that can be used in hospitals.

Implementation of a chemotherapy stewardship process.

PURPOSE: To design and implement a chemotherapy stewardship process to optimize the location of chemotherapy administration in an effort to decrease the number of inappropriate inpatient anticancer regimen administrations and decrease institutional costs associated with inpatient administration. SUMMARY: As the costs of anticancer agents continue to rise, it is crucial that multidisciplinary efforts are aimed at managing anticancer medication utilization; this is especially important for high-cost medications, medications whose use requires increased monitoring due to safety concerns, and medications that do not exert effects quickly and, as such, can be more appropriately administered in the outpatient setting. It is imperative that pharmacists play a role in managing chemotherapy medication utilization, as pharmacists provide expertise in formulary management, a vast knowledge of financial impact and reimbursement processes, and clinical knowledge that can help predict the expected effectiveness and adverse effects of each anticancer regimen. Our institution sought to develop and implement a multidisciplinary chemotherapy stewardship program targeting the optimization of site of anticancer agent administration with a goal of decreasing both cost and inappropriate utilization of high-cost, high-risk anticancer agents. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a chemotherapy stewardship service may decrease the number of inappropriate inpatient anticancer regimen administrations and decrease inpatient resource use, thereby decreasing costs to institutions. The concept of a chemotherapy stewardship process was well received by multidisciplinary healthcare colleagues, and a collaborative approach should be used to design and implement such processes.

Reducing Medication Waste While Improving Access to Sugammadex: A Quality Improvement Project in Medication Stewardship.

The relatively high cost of sugammadex compared to neostigmine limits its widespread use to reverse neuromuscular blockade, despite its faster onset and more complete clinical effect. While ensuring timely access to sugammadex is important in improving perioperative safety, it is also vital to control unnecessary spending. We describe a quality improvement initiative to reduce excess spending on sugammadex while improving access for anesthesia providers. Monthly spending on sugammadex decreased by 52% ($70,777 vs $33,821), while medication access increased via automated medication dispensers in each operating room. Clinical usage decreased by one-third, with presumed increased adherence to dosing guidelines.

Benefit of Incorporating Clinical Pharmacists in an Adult Intensive Care Unit: A Cost-saving Study.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: A framework to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacists in intensive care units (ICUs) in Chile has not yet been established. This study evaluates the cost avoidance and cost-benefit ratios of clinical pharmacist interventions in terms of treatment optimization in an adult ICU in southern Chile. METHODS: Clinical pharmacist interventions in a multidisciplinary adult ICU were assessed between January and December 2019. Only interventions suggested by pharmacists and accepted by the healthcare team were included in the analysis. Interventions were classified into six categories, and cost avoidance (in US dollars) was calculated for each category using a systematic validated approach. A cost-benefit ratio for clinical pharmacy services in the adult ICU was also calculated. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Over the 12-month period, 505 interventions were performed in 169 patients, of whom 62% were male. Interventions were classified into the following six categories: adverse drug event prevention (18%), which led to $87 882 in savings; resource utilization (ie change in medication route) (10%), which led to $50 525 in savings; individualization of patient care (ie dose adjustment) (36%), which led to $57 089 in savings; prophylaxis (ie initiation of stress ulcer prophylaxis) (<1%), which led to $167 in savings; hands-on care (ie bedside monitoring) (23%), which led to $57 846 in savings; and administrative and supportive tasks (ie patient own medication evaluation) (13%), which led to $9988 in savings. The total cost savings over the year-long period were $263 500, resulting in a cost-benefit ratio of 1:24.2. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The participation of a clinical pharmacist in a multidisciplinary ICU team reduces healthcare expenditures through treatment optimization translated into cost avoidance. This study has corroborated prior evidence that clinical pharmacist involvement in ICUs provides economic value and quality assurance in healthcare settings.

[Clinical pharmacy activities coordination in an adult psychiatry unit: Clinical and medicoeconomic impact of pharmaceutical interventions]. / Coordination des activités de pharmacie clinique dans une unité de psychiatrie adulte : impact clinique et médicoéconomique des interventions pharmaceutiques.

OBJECTIVE: Coordination and evaluation of clinical pharmacy activities are necessary to optimize their achievement. Their coordination throughout patient care program was studied in an adult psychiatry unit. The purpose was to evaluate clinical and medicoeconomic impact of pharmaceutical interventions (PIs). METHOD: During five weeks, a full time pharmaceutical presence in the unit allowed medication reconciliation, medication review and multiprofessional meetings. A multiprofessional assessment of PIs impact has been achieved with the CLEO® tool and a determination of direct drug costs was realized. RESULTS: All activities combined, 190 PIs were issued, half during multiprofessional meetings, with an acceptance rate of 67.9% (100% for PIs realized during direct interactions with clinicians). All clinical pharmacy activities demonstrated relevance according to CLEO® scale's dimensions. Around 400€ were saved on direct drug costs and an avoidance of potential prolongation of hospitalization was identified in 6 PIs. CONCLUSION: PIs number, acceptance rate and evaluation results show individual impact of activities, their complementarily and the added value of their coordination. Collaboration between professionals contributed to an efficient and secure medication management. These results are reasons to optimize clinical pharmacy practice in the healthcare facility.