Lateralization of the Pharyngeal Flap for Treatment of Lateral Velopharyngeal Gap.

Pharyngeal flap is usually used for treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI); it is bridged between the posterior pharyngeal wall and the soft palate traversing the central part of the velopharyngeal port. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of lateralization of the pharyngeal flap for treatment of VPI in patients with lateral velopharyngeal gap. Fifteen patients with VPI due to lateral velopharyngeal gap were subjected to closure of the gap by pharyngeal flap that was lateralized to fill the gap. Preoperative and postoperative assessment of velopharyngeal functions including flexible nasopharyngoscopy, auditory perceptual assessment (APA), and nasometric assessment were performed. Postoperatively, flexible nasopharyngoscopy showed complete velopharyngeal closure in all the patients, with significant improvement of speech parameters as measured by APA. Also, nasalance score showed significant improvement for oral and nasal sentences that was measured by nasometry. Lateralization of the pharyngeal flap for treatment of VPI in patients with lateral velopharyngeal gap is an effective method; it improves the velopharyngeal closure and the speech of the patients.

Salpingopharyngeus myomucosal flap.

OBJECTIVES: Improvements in the efficacy of extended endonasal approaches to resect skull base pathologies have created the need for new reconstructive alternatives. Hereby, we describe a novel pedicled myomucosal flap that allows the reconstruction of dural defects in the lower clivus and craniovertebral junction or to cover the paraclival and petrous segments of the internal carotid artery. STUDY DESIGN: Anatomic description. Technical report. Feasibility. METHODS: We describe a myomucosal flap with a cephalic pedicle based on the salpingopharyngeus muscle and its vessels. Subsequently, using a cadaveric model, we harvested the flap and explored its potential for the reconstruction of various dural defects or to cover the internal carotid artery. RESULTS: Our study confirmed the feasibility of harvesting and transposing the myomucosal salpingopharyngeus (Dicle flap) flap for the reconstruction of inferior clival and craniovertebral junction defects or to cover the petrous and paraclival segments of the internal carotid artery. CONCLUSIONS: The Dicle flap is a feasible, reconstructive alternative for the reconstruction of select small- to medium-sized defects of the posterior and inferior aspects of the ventral skull base.

Submucous cleft palate: variations in bony defects of the hard palate.

We have analysed bony defects of the hard palate in patients with submucous cleft palate to find out whether velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is dependent on the extent of these defects. We evaluated the maxillofacial structures associated with cleft palate by 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) in 23 children diagnosed with submucous cleft palate. Bony defects of the hard palate were divided into Type I, defined as absent posterior nasal spine (n=12), Type II, V-shaped bony notch (moderate, n=7), and Type III, as bony defect extending into the incisive foramen (severe, n=4) defects, respectively. VPI was found in 10, 3, and 4 patients, respectively. Neither VPI nor the degree of bifid uvula was significantly associated with the types of bony defects.

Pharyngeal flap versus sphincter pharyngoplasty for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) has been reported in 5-20% of patients following cleft palate repair. Since VPI can limit communication, determining which operative procedure leads to the greatest improvement is of utmost importance. Since there is no consensus, this meta-analysis aims to determine which procedure results in the most significant resolution of VPI. METHODS: Two independent assessors undertook a literature review for articles that compare procedures aimed at treating VPI. Study quality was determined using validated scales. Level of agreement was assessed using intra-class coalition coefficient analysis. The heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using I(2) and Cochran's Q-statistic. Random effect model analysis and forest plots were used to report a pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for treatment effect. A p-value of 0.05 was considered for statistical significance. RESULTS: Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharyngeal flap to sphincter pharyngoplasty were obtained. A total of 133 patients were included, with follow-ups at 3-4 months. The pooled OR was determined to be 2.95 (95% CI: 0.66-13.23) in favour of the pharyngeal flap. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these RCTs, which currently compose the highest quality data that compares pharyngeal flap versus pharyngoplasty, the pooled treatment effect suggests a possible trend favouring pharyngeal flap.

Predictors of velopharyngeal insufficiency after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with cleft palate.

PURPOSE: Approximately 25% to 40% of patients with cleft lip/palate develop maxillary retrusion that requires Le Fort I osteotomy. Maxillary advancement brings the soft palate forward, and this may cause velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). The goal of this study was to identify predictors that place patients with repaired cleft palate at risk of developing VPI after Le Fort I advancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of nonsyndromic patients with cleft lip/palate who had a Le Fort I osteotomy between 2000 and 2008. Charts were reviewed and data were collected on patient characteristics, preoperative speech assessments, and nasopharyngoscopic reports. Pre- and postoperative cephalometric radiographs were used to measure maxillary advancement and to assess the structure of the velopharynx. Simple logistic regression analysis examined the association between each predictive variable and postoperative VPI, as indicated by need for pharyngeal flap. Predictors with P ≤ .10 were included in the multivariate regression model. In both the univariate and the multivariate analyses, P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed a significant association between preoperative soft palatal length and need for a pharyngeal flap (P = .005). By multivariate analysis, both preoperative soft palatal length and postoperative pharyngeal depth were associated with need for pharyngeal flap (P = .003 and P = .030). CONCLUSION: This study shows that a short soft palate is associated with VPI after Le Fort I osteotomy. Assessment of palatal length and pharyngeal depth on cephalometric radiographs is helpful in predicting postoperative VPI and need for a pharyngeal flap in patients with cleft palate after maxillary advancement.

[Velopharyngeal sequels in labial-alveolar-velopalatine clefts. Veloplasty and pharyngoplasty using an inferior or superior pedicle pharyngeal flap]. / Les séquelles vélopharyngées dans les fentes labioalvéolopalatovélaires. Véloplasties et pharyngoplasties par lambeau pharyngé à pédicule supérieur ou inférieur.

Velopharyngeal insufficiency remains a sequel of labial-alveolar-velopalatine clefts. It may occur despite a good quality primary repair. A surgical management must be considered as soon as speech therapy is no longer efficient or before any irreversible compensatory speech pattern appears. Thus, surgery should be decided on after consultation between the surgeon and the speech pathologist or speech therapist, when considering that speech therapy has failed. Several surgical techniques are discussed: intravelar veloplasty, Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty, pharyngoplasty using an inferior or superior pedicle flap. Superior pedicle flap surgery is currently the most commonly used technique. For the past twenty years we have used this technique as described by Petit and modified by Malek, because of the excellent speech results. The drawbacks are known and can be contained by a preventive management.

Blinded speech evaluation following pharyngeal flap surgery by speech pathologists and lay people in children with cleft palate.

METHODS: In order to assess intermediate-term speech outcome after pharyngeal flap surgery for velopharyngeal dysfunction in children with cleft palate between 1980 and 1998, their pre- and postoperative speech performance was analyzed in a blinded fashion by speech pathologists and adult lay people. Speech was evaluated on the basis of tape recordings with regard to resonance, intelligibility, articulation, voice and secondary speech disorders. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients could be evaluated. Both lay assessors and speech pathologists noted a significant improvement in speech performance after pharyngeal flap surgery. The percentage of children who improved was 83% (19/23, 95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.98, p = 0.002) when rated by lay people, and 87% (20/23, CI 0.73-1.01, p < 0.0001) when rated by professionals. Rated on a 5-point scale, the mean improvement per speech characteristic was 0.52 +/- 0.32 scale points when judged by lay people, and 0.75 +/- 0.8 points when judged by experts. Experts considered none of the children to have normal speech after surgery. Agreement with regard to outcome between lay people and speech pathologists occurred in 87% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The cranially based pharyngeal flap can improve speech performance in cleft palate children with chronic velopharyngeal insufficiency. However, it cannot be expected that this type of surgery will result in normal speech.

Results with sphincter pharyngoplasty and pharyngeal flap.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate speech outcomes and complications of sphincter pharyngoplasty and pharyngeal flap performed for management of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Tertiary care children's hospital. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty from 1990 to 1995. METHODS: Perceptual speech analysis was used to assess severity of VPI, presence of nasal air emissions and quality of nasal resonance (hyper, hypo, or normal). Pre-operative measures of velopharyngeal function were based upon nasendoscopy and videofluoroscopic speech assessment. Recommendations for management were made by the attending surgeon. Complications of hyponasality and obstructive sleep symptoms (OSS) were noted. Patient characteristics were compared using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent sphincter pharyngoplasty and 18 patients underwent superiorly based pharyngeal flap. Patients were similar in terms of lateral pharyngeal wall medial motion and palatal elevation. The groups were also similar with regard to VPI severity, though there was a trend for more severe VPI in patients undergoing sphincter pharyngoplasty than pharyngeal flap (50 vs. 33.3%, respectively). Patients with pharyngoplasty had a higher rate of resolution of VPI than those who had pharyngeal flap (50 vs. 22.2%, respectively), although this was not statistically significant. Post-operative hyponasality and obstructive sleep symptoms were present in both groups. However, only patients who underwent PF and had postoperative OSS had obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). CONCLUSIONS: There were no detectable anatomic differences between treatment groups implying that treatment selection during the study period was not guided by strict anatomic criteria. Sphincter pharyngoplasty may have a higher success rate with a lower risk of OSS.

Long-term outcome analysis of two treatment methods for cleft palate: combined levator retropositioning and pharyngeal flap versus double-opposing Z-plasty.

OBJECTIVE: Two surgical techniques for repair of a cleft palate include levator retropositioning in combination with a pharyngeal flap and the Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty. This study compared morbidity and speech results from the use of these two methods in an effort to determine which was the superior technique. DESIGN: Patient records from 1986 to 1996 were retrospectively reviewed, and 10 patients with a cleft palate who underwent repair with a levator retropositioning and pharyngeal flap were compared to 14 patients who underwent a double-opposing Z-plasty repair. Postoperative complications including fistula formation, obstructive sleep apnea, and residual velopharyngeal insufficiency were recorded. Speech was assessed perceptually and through the use of nasometry. RESULTS: Both surgical techniques resulted in good speech in the majority of patients. Only two patients in the study, both in the Z-plasty group, had severe postoperative hypernasality. Two patients in the levator retropositioning and pharyngeal flap group developed severe postoperative obstructive sleep apnea, requiring additional surgery. CONCLUSION: The levator retropositioning and pharyngeal flap technique was successful in achieving good speech results, but it also caused more serious postoperative complications when compared to the double-opposing Z-plasty technique.

Functional outcome in soft palate reconstruction using a radial forearm free flap in conjunction with a superiorly based pharyngeal flap.

BACKGROUND: Speech and swallowing problems due to velopharyngeal incompetence may follow soft palate resection and reconstruction. Over the past 3 years, we have developed the use of a superiorly based pharyngeal flap in conjunction with a radial forearm flap for soft palate reconstruction. METHODS: This paper describes the technique in detail and compares the functional results in a study with patients undergoing soft palate resection for squamous cell carcinoma treated with or without a pharyngeal flap as an adjunct to a radial forearm free flap for soft palate reconstruction. Seven patients had one quarter or one half soft palate defects reconstructed with a radial forearm flap alone. Of the 11 patients undergoing three quarter or total soft palate resections, all were reconstructed with a radial forearm flap, but 5 were treated with an additional superiorly based pharyngeal flap. The functional outcome for all the patients was analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Our results show that the addition of the superiorly based pharyngeal to the radical forearm flap in soft palate reconstruction results in improved speech and swallowing. We recommend the use of the additional flap in resections in which more than one quarter of the soft palate is included.

Surgical management of velopharyngeal dysfunction: outcome analysis of autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation.

Posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation has been advocated for patients having velopharyngeal dysfunction with a small coronal gap. Nonautogenous augmentation has not been accepted widely because of migration or extrusion of alloplastic implants and resorption of injected materials. Autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation has been performed for decades by Italian surgeons. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this procedure. Autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation, using a rolled superiorly based pharyngeal myomucosal flap, was performed on 14 patients, between November of 1989 and June of 1992, who fulfilled two criteria: velopharyngeal dysfunction unresponsive to speech therapy and a small (< 20 percent) coronal gap on velopharyngeal nasendoscopy. Of these, 3 patients had prior prosthetic velopharyngeal management, including 2 patients with Robin sequence. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively with recorded (audio-videotape) perceptual, nasendoscopic, and fluoroscopic standardized speech and airway evaluations. The tapes were used for construction of a randomized master tape that was presented in blinded fashion and random order to three skilled raters for independent assessment of numerous perceptual and instrumental parameters of speech. The raters were uninvolved in the care of the patients or this study, and their intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were known. Preoperatively, the majority of patients had nasal turbulence. All patients had variable degrees of hypernasality ranging from intermittent to pervasive. Parameters rated included (1) resonance (hypernasality, hyponasality, mixed), (2) auditory nasal emission (including nasal turbulence), and (3) visual characteristics regarding velopharyngeal closure. The visual parameters consisted of questions about whether a pharyngeal bulge was present or absent, descriptions of posterior pharyngeal wall movements with speech, level of closure, completeness of velopharyngeal closure, and quantitative descriptions of the percentage of velopharyngeal closure postoperatively. Examiners were instructed to look for a static and/or dynamic projection or bulge (i.e., Passavant's ridge) and, if a bulge was present, whether the level of velopharyngeal closure was on the same plane as the neoposterior pharyngeal bulge. Results of the extramural judgments of these parameters showed that there was no statistically significant tendency for patients' speech to be rated as more normal after the augmentation procedure than before it. We conclude that (1) autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation does not result in speech improvement and (2) autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation does not impair the nasal airway.

Combined radial forearm and pharyngeal flap for soft palate reconstruction.

The use of a free vascularised fascio-cutaneous radial forearm flap in combination with a cranially based pharyngeal flap for soft palate reconstruction has not been previously reported. We present the technique and illustrate its use in two cases of total and one case of subtotal soft palate reconstruction. The functional outcome is discussed with particular reference to nasal airway patency, speech and swallowing.