US commercial health plan coverage dynamics in pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies.

BACKGROUND: Health plan coverage is central to patient access to care, especially for rare, chronic diseases. For specialty drugs, coverage varies, resulting in barriers to access. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, progressive, and fatal disease. Guidelines suggest starting or rapidly escalating to combination therapy with drugs of differing classes (phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors [PDE5is], soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators [sGC stimulators], endothelin receptor antagonists [ERAs], and prostacyclin pathway agents [PPAs]). OBJECTIVE: To assess the variation in commercial health plan coverage for PAH treatments and how coverage has evolved. To examine the frequency of coverage updates and evidence cited in plan policies. METHODS: We used the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage database, which includes publicly available specialty drug coverage policies. Overall, and at the drug and treatment class level, we identified plan-imposed coverage restrictions beyond the drug's US Food and Drug Administration label, including step therapy protocols, clinical restrictions (eg, disease severity), and prescriber specialty requirements. We analyzed variation in coverage restrictiveness and how coverage has changed over time. We determined how often plans update their policies. Finally, we categorized the cited evidence into 6 different types. RESULTS: Results reflected plan coverage policies for 13 PAH drugs active between August 2017 and August 2022 and issued by 17 large US commercial health plans, representing 70% of covered lives. Coverage restrictions varied mainly by step therapy protocols and prescriber restrictions. Seven plans had step therapy protocols for most drugs, 9 for at least one drug, and 1 had none. Ten plans required specialist (cardiologist or pulmonologist) prescribing for at least one drug, and 7 did not. Coverage restrictions increased over time: the proportion of policies with at least 1 restriction increased from 38% to 73%, and the proportion with step therapy protocols increased from 29% to 46%, with generics as the most common step. The proportion of policies with step therapy protocols increased for every therapy class with generic availability: 18% to 59% for ERAs, 33% to 77% for PDE5is, and 33% to 43% for PPAs. The proportion of policies with prescriber requirements increased from 24% to 48%. Plans updated their policies 58% of the time annually and most often cited the 2019 CHEST clinical guidelines, followed by randomized controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: Plan use of coverage restrictions for PAH therapies increased over time and varied across both drugs and plans. Inconsistency among health plans may complicate patient access and reduce the proportion who can persist on PAH treatments.

Prophylactic sildenafil to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) persists as one of the foremost factors contributing to mortality and morbidity in extremely preterm infants. The effectiveness of administering sildenafil early on to prevent BPD remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of prophylactically administered sildenafil during the early life stages of preterm infants to prevent mortality and BPD. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Ichushi were searched. Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, interrupted time series, cohort studies, case-control studies, and controlled before-and-after studies were included. Two reviewers independently screened the title, abstract, and full text, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias, and evaluated the certainty of evidence (CoE) following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment and Development and Evaluation approach. The random-effects model was used for a meta-analysis of RCTs. RESULTS: This review included three RCTs (162 infants). There were no significant differences between the prophylactic sildenafil and placebo groups in mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-10.75; very low CoE), BPD (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.79-1.83; very low CoE), and all other outcome assessed (all with very low CoE). The sample sizes were less than the optimal sizes for all outcomes assessed, indicating the need for further trials. CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic use of sildenafil in individuals at risk of BPD did not indicate any advantageous effects in terms of mortality, BPD, and other outcomes, or increased side effects.

PDE5 inhibition mitigates heart failure in hyperlipidemia.

PDE5 inhibitors was reported to play a protective role in both regulating lipid metabolism and reducing heart failure (HF). This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of PDE5 inhibitors against hyperlipidemia-related HF by combining evidence from population-based study and animal models. The nationwide cohort study found that post-diagnostic use of PDE5 inhibitors was associated with a significantly lower risk of HF compared with patients who used alprostadil, especially among individuals with hyperlipidemia (adjusted HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.40-0.78). In animal models, sildenafil significantly recovered the cardiac structure and function induced by AAB surgery, as well as reversed liver dysfunction and ameliorated hyperlipidemia induced by HFD via reducing the level of ALT, AST and serum lipids. Lipidomic analysis identified four lipid metabolites involved in sildenafil administration, including FA 16:3, LPC O-18:1, DG24:0_18:0 and SE28:1/20:4. This study revealed the protective effect of PDE5 inhibitors against HF in hyperlipidemia, indicating the potential of being repurposed as an adjuvant for HF prevention in patients with hyperlipidemia if these findings can be further confirmed in clinical trials.

Conservative treatment of Peyronie's disease: a guide.

PURPOSE: To review the literature on the topic, to suggest a common line of treatment applicable across a wide community of specialists, and to contribute in maintaining the high level of interest in this disease. METHODS: A comprehensive and exhaustive review of the literature was performed, identifying hundreds of articles on the topic. RESULTS: Peyronie's disease is a condition that has been recognized, studied, and treated for centuries; despite this, if one excludes surgery in cases in which the deformity is stable, no clear treatment (or line of treatment) is available for complete relief of signs and symptoms. Treatment options were divided into local, oral, and injection therapy, and a wide variety of drugs, remedies, and options were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy, vacuum therapy, penile traction therapy, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, hyaluronic acid, and collagenase of Clostridium histolyticum may be recommended only in specific contexts. Further studies on individual options or potential combinations are required.

Prognostic Value and Determinants of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in Patients With a Systemic Right Ventricle: Insights From the SERVE Trial.

BACKGROUND: The determinants and prognostic value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) among patients with a systemic right ventricle are largely unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients from the randomized controlled SERVE (Effect of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition With Tadalafil on Systemic Right Ventricular Size and Function) trial were included. The correlation between baseline hs-cTnT concentrations and biventricular volumes and function quantified by cardiac magnetic resonance or cardiac multirow detector computed tomography was assessed by adjusted linear regression models. The prognostic value of hs-cTnT was assessed by adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, survival analysis, and concordance statistics. The primary outcome was time to the composite of clinically relevant arrhythmia, hospitalization for heart failure, or all-cause death. Median age was 39 (interquartile range, 32-48) years, and 32% were women. Median hs-cTnT concentration was 7 (interquartile range, 4-11) ng/L. Coefficients of determination for the relationship between hs-cTnT concentrations and right ventricular end-systolic volume index and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) were +0.368 (P=0.046) and -0.381 (P=0.018), respectively. The sex- and age-adjusted hazard ratio for the primary outcome of hs-cTnT at 2 and 4 times the reference level (5 ng/L) were 2.89 (95% CI, 1.14-7.29) and 4.42 (95% CI, 1.21-16.15), respectively. The prognostic performance quantified by the concordance statistics for age- and sex-adjusted models based on hs-cTnT, right ventricular ejection fraction, and peak oxygen uptake predicted were comparable: 0.71% (95% CI, 0.61-0.82), 0.72% (95% CI, 0.59-0.84), and 0.71% (95% CI, 0.59-0.83), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hs-cTnT concentration was significantly correlated with right ventricular ejection fraction and right ventricular end-systolic volume index in patients with a systemic right ventricle. The prognostic accuracy of hs-cTnT was comparable to that of right ventricular ejection fraction and peak oxygen uptake predicted. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03049540.

The effect of combination treatment with low-intensity shockwave therapy and daily tadalafil on severe erectile dysfunction: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe erectile dysfunction (ED) remain the most challenging group in terms of available noninvasive treatment modalities. AIM: The study sought to assess the role of combination therapy with low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) and daily tadalafil 5 mg in a highly select group of patients with severe vasculogenic ED through a double-blind, randomized trial. METHODS: Forty-eight sexually active men were randomly assigned to 12 sessions of LiST 3 times weekly and tadalafil 5 mg once daily (n = 34) or sham therapy and tadalafil (n = 17) for 4 weeks. Patients were assessed at 1 and 3 months after completion of treatment. OUTCOMES: Improvement of erectile function was evaluated through the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF) or 6-item IIEF and the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary. The primary outcome was the difference between the groups in the IIEF-EF at 3 months after completion of treatment. Secondary outcomes comprised (1) the difference between the groups in the IIEF-EF at 1 month after completion of treatment, (2) the difference between the groups in the "yes" responses to question 3 of the SEP diary at 1 and 3 months, and (3) the treatment-related adverse events. The number of patients attaining a minimal clinically important difference in the IIEF-EF (improvement of at least 7 points) was also assessed. RESULTS: After treatment, the absolute scores in the IIEF-EF were higher in patients receiving LiST and tadalafil vs sham therapy and tadalafil both at the 1-month (12.1 ± 2.4 vs 10.2 ± 1.7; P = .002) and at the 3-month (12.9 ± 2.1 vs 10.8 ± 1.8; P < .001) evaluation. Between the 2 groups, the proportion of "yes" responses to question 3 of the SEP diary was not statistically significant, whereas the number of patients attaining a minimal clinically important difference in the IIEF-EF was statistically significant only at the 3-month evaluation. No adverse events occurred. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Application of LiST in patients with severe vasculogenic ED receiving daily dose tadalafil may further improve erectile function compared with tadalafil as a stand-alone treatment on the short term. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Although we provided the first study in the field, severe vasculogenic ED was defined based on medical history and clinical examination and not based on penile ultrasound measures. CONCLUSION: The combination of 12 sessions LiST 3 times weekly and daily tadalafil for 4 weeks led to a 2-point difference in the IIEF-EF compared with sham therapy and daily tadalafil among patients with severe vasculogenic ED after 1 and 3 months from completion of treatment.

Role of Aortic Stiffness in Predicting Response to Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction. / Papel da Rigidez Aórtica na Previsão da Resposta aos Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase-5 no Tratamento da Disfunção Erétil.

BACKGROUND: It is known that aortic stiffness (AS) increases in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). Phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE-5) enzyme inhibitors are used in the treatment of ED, and patients' responses to this treatment may vary. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the role of AS in predicting the response of patients planned to take PDE-5 enzyme inhibitors due to ED. METHODS: A total of 96 male patients with ED were included in the study. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire was used to evaluate the presence and severity of ED and the response to treatment. Transthoracic echocardiography was used to evaluate AS. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the aortic strain and aortic distensibility values of the study groups (p<0.001). The delta IIEF score had a high level of positive correlation with aortic strain (p<0.01, r=0.758) and a moderate level of positive correlation with aortic distensibility (p<0.01, r=0.574). CONCLUSION: We determined that in patients with ED, aortic strain and aortic distensibility measured non-invasively using transthoracic echocardiography are important parameters in predicting patients' response to PDE-5 inhibitor therapy.

FUNDAMENTO: Sabe-se que a rigidez aórtica (RA) aumenta em pacientes com disfunção erétil (DE). Os inibidores da enzima fosfodiesterase tipo 5 (PDE-5) são usados no tratamento da DE, e as respostas dos pacientes a esse tratamento podem variar. OBJETIVOS: Nosso objetivo foi investigar o papel da RA na previsão da resposta de pacientes planejados para tomar inibidores da enzima PDE-5 devido à DE. MÉTODOS: Um total de 96 pacientes do sexo masculino com DE foram incluídos no estudo. O questionário do Índice Internacional de Função Erétil (IIEF) foi utilizado para avaliar a presença e gravidade da DE e a resposta ao tratamento. A ecocardiografia transtorácica foi utilizada para avaliar RA. RESULTADOS: Houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os valores de deformação aórtica e distensibilidade aórtica dos grupos de estudo (p<0,001). O escore delta IIEF apresentou alto nível de correlação positiva com a deformação aórtica (p<0,01, r=0,758) e um nível moderado de correlação positiva com a distensibilidade aórtica (p<0,01, r=0,574). CONCLUSÃO: Determinamos que em pacientes com DE, a deformação aórtica e a distensibilidade aórtica medidas de forma não invasiva por meio de ecocardiografia transtorácica são parâmetros importantes na previsão da resposta dos pacientes à terapia com inibidores da PDE-5.

PKC Inhibition Improves Human Penile Vascular Function and the NO/cGMP Pathway in Diabetic Erectile Dysfunction: The Role of NADPH Oxidase.

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a frequent and difficult-to-treat condition in diabetic men. Protein kinase C (PKC) is involved in diabetes-related vascular and cavernosal alterations. We aimed to evaluate the role of PKC in endothelial dysfunction and NO/cGMP impairment associated with diabetic ED in the human corpus cavernosum (CC) and penile resistance arteries (PRAs) and the potential mechanisms involved. Functional responses were determined in the CC and PRAs in patients with non-diabetic ED and diabetic ED undergoing penile prosthesis insertion. PKC activator 12,13-phorbol-dibutyrate (PDBu) impaired endothelial relaxations and cGMP generation in response to acetylcholine in the CC from non-diabetic ED. PDBu also impaired responses to a PDE5 inhibitor, sildenafil, in non-diabetic ED patients. Conversely, a PKC inhibitor, GF109203X, improved endothelial, neurogenic, and PDE5-inhibitor-induced relaxations and cGMP generation only in the CC in diabetic ED patients. Endothelial and PDE5-inhibitor-induced vasodilations of PRAs were potentiated only in diabetes. Improvements in endothelial function in diabetes were also achieved with a specific inhibitor of the PKCß2 isoform or an NADPH-oxidase inhibitor, apocynin, which prevented PDBu-induced impairment in non-diabetic patients. PKC inhibition counteracted NO/cGMP impairment and endothelial dysfunction in diabetes-related ED, potentially improving response to PDE5 inhibition.

Medical Advancements in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatments.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to identify and summarize the current literature on the most recent therapeutic agents and combination strategies for the medical management of lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia. RECENT FINDINGS: The latest advancements in BPH therapy have been in combination strategies. Alpha blockers continue to be the mainstay of treatment, but research is exploring the synergistic benefits of combining them with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs), phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors, and beta-3 agonists. The alpha-blocker + 5-ARI combination remains ideal for enlarged, significantly reducing clinical progression risk compared to monotherapy. Alpha-blocker + PDE5 inhibitor combinations appear safe and potentially beneficial for men with concomitant erectile dysfunction; sildenafil might hold an edge over tadalafil based on limited data. Beta-3 agonists show synergistic effects with alpha blockers for residual storage symptoms, offering similar efficacy to anticholinergics but with a better side effect profile.

Major adverse cardiovascular events related to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors: analysis of real-life data from Eudra-Vigilance database.

BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) are the standard medical treatment for erectile dysfunction. Aim of our study was to evaluate the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) reported during PDE5i treatment based on Eudra-Vigilance (EV) reports. METHODS: EV database is the system for managing and analyzing data on suspected adverse reactions to medicines which have been authorized or being studied in clinical trials in the European Economic Area. MACE are defined as non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal congestive heart failure, revascularization after aorto-coronary graft bypass and cardiovascular death. We recorded the number of MACE for sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, avanafil per category and severity until 1st July 2023. Pooled Relative Risk (PRR) was used to compare data between drugs. RESULTS: Overall, 951 MACE events were reported. Most of them were observed in younger patients <65 years old (452/951 events, 48%). Overall, 377/8939 (4%) MACE events were observed for sildenafil, 221/5213 (4%) for tadalafil, 50/1029 (4%) for vardenafil and no events for avanafil. No significative differences were reported comparing sildenafil and tadalafil (PRR 0.71-0.99, IQR 0.61-1.35, P>0.05), neither sildenafil vs. vardenafil (PRR 0.68-0.79, IQR 0.43-1.55, P>0.05), neither tadalafil vs. vardenafil (PRR 0.77-0.95, IQR 0.64-1.30. P>0.05) even when compared for age. Comparison between different classes of age showed MACE were more frequent in patients younger than 65 years old taking sildenafil and tadalafil when compared to patients older than 85 years old (PRR 0.02-0.11. IQR 0.01-0.40. P<0.01) and when compared to patients in 65-85 class of age (PRR 0.02-0.12, IQR 0.01-0.95, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Real life data is consistent with MACE related to PDE5i. PDE5is are infrequently (<5%) associated with MACE. However, risk seems higher in younger patients, particularly for sildenafil (452/951 events, 48%). Clinicians should consider these data when prescribing PDE5i especially in young patients.

Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors in Men With Erectile Dysfunction and the Risk of Alzheimer Disease: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Repurposing phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) as drugs for Alzheimer disease (AD) risk reduction has shown promise based on animal studies. However, evidence in humans remains inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted a cohort study to evaluate the association between PDE5I initiation compared with nonuse and the risk of developing AD in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: Using electronic health records from IQVIA Medical Research Data UK (formerly known as the THIN database), we identified men aged ≥40 years with a new diagnosis of ED between 2000 and 2017. Individuals with a previous diagnosis of dementia, cognitive impairment, confusion, or prescription for dementia symptoms were excluded. The occurrence of incident AD was identified using diagnostic read codes. To minimize immortal-time bias, PDE5I initiation was treated as a time-varying exposure variable. Potential confounders were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CIs. A secondary analysis explored the association between AD and the cumulative number of PDE5I prescriptions. Sensitivity analyses included lag (delay) periods of 1 and 3 years after cohort entry to address the prodromal stage of AD. RESULTS: The study included 269,725 men, with 1,119 newly diagnosed with AD during a median follow-up of 5.1 (interquartile range 2.9-8.9) years. The adjusted HR in PDE5I initiators compared with nonuse was 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.93). The associated risk of AD decreased in individuals issued >20 prescriptions: HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.43-0.73) for 21-50 prescriptions and HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.49-0.87) for >50 prescriptions. Sensitivity analysis with a 1-year lag period supported the primary findings (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.94), but the results differed with the inclusion of a 3-year lag period (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.80-1.08). DISCUSSION: PDE5I initiation in men with ED was associated with a lower risk of AD, particularly in those most frequently issued prescriptions. The differences between primary and sensitivity analyses highlight the need to explore the optimal lag period. To enhance the generalizability of our findings, a randomized controlled trial including both sexes and exploring various PDE5I doses would be beneficial to confirm the association between PDE5I and AD.

Avanafil: A comprehensive drug profile.

Avanafil is an oral medication used to treat erectile dysfunction (ED). As a phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, it functions by inhibiting the PDE5 enzyme, which ultimately results in increased levels of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and improved blood flow to the penis. Approved by the FDA in 2012, avanafil is recognised for its rapid onset of action, short half-life, and favourable side-effects profile. While it has been explored for other potential therapeutic applications, its current approved use is limited to ED and should be used as prescribed by a medical professional. This chapter provides a comprehensive review of avanafil, encompassing its nomenclature, physicochemical properties, methods of preparation, and identification. Various techniques for analysing avanafil, such as electrochemical analysis, spectrophotometric, spectrofluorimetric, and chromatographic techniques, are discussed. The pharmacology of avanafil, including its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, is also examined.

Impact of rapid sequential combination therapy on distinct haemodynamic measures in newly diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension.

AIMS: In pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), upfront combination therapy with ERA and PDE5i is associated with a reduction in morbidity and mortality events and improves standard haemodynamics, but data remain limited. Aims of this study were (i) to capture detailed haemodynamic effects of rapid sequential dual combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed PAH; (ii) to monitor the impact of treatment initiation on clinical variables and patients' risk status, and (iii) to compare the treatment effect in patients with 'classical PAH' and 'PAH with co-morbidities'. METHODS: Fifty patients (median age 57 [42-71] years, 66% female) with newly diagnosed PAH (76% idiopathic) were treated with a PD5i/sGC-S or ERA, followed by addition of the respective other drug class within 4 weeks. All patients underwent repeat right heart catheterization (RHC) during early follow-up. RESULTS: At early repeat RHC (7 ± 2 months), there were substantial reductions in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP: 52.2 ± 13.5 to 39.0 ± 10.6 mmHg; -25.3%), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR: 12.1 ± 5.7 to 5.8 ± 3.1 WU; -52.1%), and an increase in cardiac index (2.1 ± 0.4 to 2.7 ± 0.7 mL/min/m2; +32.2%) (all P < 0.05). Haemodynamic improvements correlated with improved clinical parameters including 6-min walking distance (336 ± 315 to 389 ± 120 m), NTproBNP levels (1.712 ± 2.024 to 506 ± 550 ng/L, both P < 0.05) and WHO-FC at 12 months, resulting in improved risk status, and were found in patients with few (n = 37) or multiple cardiovascular co-morbidities (BMI > 30 kg/m2, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease [≥3]; n = 13), albeit baseline PVR in PAH patients with multiple co-morbidities was lower (9.3 ± 4.4 vs. 13.1 ± 5.9 WU) and PVR reduction less pronounced compared with those with few co-morbidities (-42.7% vs. -54.7%). However, comprehensive haemodynamic assessment considering further variables of prognostic relevance such as stroke volume index and pulmonary artery compliance showed similar improvements among the two groups (SVI: +50.0% vs. +49.2%; PAC: 91.7% vs. 100.0%). Finally, the 4-strata risk assessment approach was better able to capture treatment response as compared with other approaches, particularly in patients with co-morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid sequential combination therapy with PDE5i/sGC-S and ERA substantially ameliorates cardiopulmonary haemodynamics at early follow-up in patients without, and to a lesser extent, with cardiovascular co-morbidities. This occurs in line with improvements of clinical parameters and risk status.

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors do not prevent curvature progression but shorten pain duration in the active phase of Peyronie's Disease: A retrospective cohort study.

Treatment with Phosphodiesterase Type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) has shown promise in managing Peyronie's disease (PD) during its active phase. In a retrospective cohort study of 133 PD patients, we compared daily PDE5i treatment (sildenafil 25 mg or tadalafil 5 mg) in Group 1 (n = 101) to no treatment in Group 2 (n = 32). The mean age ± SD was 58.5 ± 10, (range: 29-77) years in Group 1 and 59 ± 13.7 years (range: 23-80) in Group 2 (p = 0.5). Mean symptom onset-to-visit time was 10.6 ± 7.2 months (range: 1-37) in Group 1 and 11 ± 6.3 months (range 3-27) in Group 2 (p = 0.5). Mean penile curvature change was +0.87° (95% CI: -1.8, 3.5) in Group 1 and +5.72° (95% CI: 1.4, 10) in Group 2 (p = 0.07) between first and last observations. Group 1 experienced shorter mean pain duration (9.1 ± 4.7 months, range: 2.5-24) than Group 2 (12.2 ± 6.5 months, range: 5-28) (p = 0.04). When controlling for baseline curvature and symptom onset-to-visit time, there were no differences between groups (-4.7, 95% CI: -10, 0.6) (p = 0.08). In conclusion, continuous PDE5i treatment did not affect PD curvature progression but showed a promising effect on pain.

Risk of Death in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Taking Nitrates and Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) treatment for erectile dysfunction is associated with lower mortality compared with no treatment for erectile dysfunction after myocardial infarction (MI). There are conflicting results regarding the impact of PDE5i treatment on mortality in conjunction with nitrate medication. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between PDE5i treatment and cardiovascular outcomes in men with stable coronary artery disease treated with nitrate medication. METHODS: Using the Swedish Patient Register and the Prescribed Drug Register we included men with previous MI or revascularization in 2006-2013 who had 2 dispensed nitrate prescriptions within 6 months. Exposure was defined as at least 2 filled prescriptions of any PDE5i. We performed multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression to estimate HRs with 95% CIs for all-cause, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality, MI, heart failure, cardiac revascularization, and major cardiovascular events (MACE). RESULTS: In total, 55,777 men were treated with nitrates and 5,710 men with nitrates and a PDE5i. The combined use of PDE5i treatment with nitrates was associated with higher mortality (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.28-1.51), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.11-1.62), noncardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.27-1.54), MI (HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.55-1.90), heart failure (HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.48-1.90), cardiac revascularization (HR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.78-2.13), and MACE (HR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.58-1.83). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a PDE5i in combination with nitrate medication in men with stable coronary artery disease may pose an increased hazard for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Careful patient-centered consideration before prescribing PDE5is to patients with cardiovascular disease using nitrate medication is warranted.

Comparison of Monotherapies and Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Tadalafil for Treating Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Caused by Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with or without Erectile Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is limited research into the efficacy and safety of tadalafil combined with tamsulosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), with or without erectile dysfunction (ED). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy compared to that of monotherapy. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang Data Service Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify eligible studies. A total of 639 articles were retrieved, of which 12 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published as of February 2023 and included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: After screening 639 articles, 12 RCTs including 1,531 subjects were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The results showed that the total International Prostate System Score (total IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), and quality of life (QoL) in tadalafil combined with tamsulosin were significantly better than those in monotherapy. Compared with tadalafil monotherapy, combination therapy mainly improved IPSS voiding. As for postvoid residual urine (PVR), the combination therapy did not improve PVR compared to the tadalafil group, but significantly improved PVR compared to the tamsulosin group. For the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the curative effect of the combined group was better than that of the tamsulosin group but not better than that of the tadalafil group. In terms of safety, the adverse reactions (AEs) in the combined treatment group were significantly higher than those in the monotherapy group. None of the 12 RCTs reported serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil combined with tamsulosin was more effective in the treatment of male LUTS/BPH, with or without ED, on the improvement of total IPSS, QoL, and Qmax. However, the benefits of combination therapy for ED remain unclear. However, combination therapy seemed to have a higher incidence of adverse reactions.