P3MC: a double blind parallel group randomised placebo controlled trial of Propranolol and Pizotifen in preventing migraine in children.

BACKGROUND: A recent Cochrane Review demonstrated the remarkable lack of reliable clinical trials of migraine treatments for children, especially for the two most prescribed preventative treatments in the UK, Propranolol and Pizotifen.Migraine trials in both children and adults have high placebo responder rates, e.g. of 23%, but for a trial's results to be generalisable "placebo responders" should not be excluded and for a drug to be worthwhile it should be clearly superior, both clinically and statistically, to placebo. METHODS/DESIGN: Two multicentre, two arm double blind parallel group randomised controlled trials, with allocation ratio of 2:1 for each comparison, Propranolol versus placebo and Pizotifen versus placebo. The trial is designed to test whether Propranolol is superior to placebo and whether Pizotifen is superior to placebo for the prevention of migraine attacks in children aged 5-16 years referred to secondary care out-patient settings with frequent migraine (2-6/4 weeks). The primary outcome measure is the number of migraine attacks during trial weeks 11 to 14. DISCUSSION: A strength of this trial is the participation of clinically well defined migraine patients who will also be approached to help with future longer-term follow-up studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN97360154.

Síndrome confusional por pizotifeno / No disponible

No disponible

Pharmacological prevention of migraine: to be considered case by case.

(1) Migraines are characterized by recurrent headaches generally lasting between 4 and 72 hours and disappearing without complication. They can be incapacitating, owing to their frequency and/or intensity. (2) Many drugs have been used to prevent migraines. One of the most common outcome measures used in clinical trials is the proportion of responder patients, defined as those in whom the monthly frequency of migraines is at least halved. On average, about one-third of patients respond to placebo in clinical trials. (3) Propranolol is the betablocker with the best-documented efficacy: in absolute terms the response rate is about 30% higher than with placebo. The adverse effects of betablockers are mainly cardiovascular and neuropsychological. (4) Valproic acid, an anticonvulsant, is about as effective as propranolol, and its adverse effects are generally acceptable. (5) Amitriptyline is the antidepressant with the best-documented preventive effects, with a response rate about 20% higher than placebo. Its principal adverse effects are due to its atropinic action. Amitriptyline can also have a sedative effect. (6) Flunarizine also has documented efficacy, but this "hidden neuroleptic" can cause extrapyramidal disorders and weight gain. (7) Among the serotonergic antagonists, methysergide has documented efficacy but long-term treatment can lead to serious retroperitoneal, pulmonary or cardiac fibrosis. Pizotifen causes drowsiness or weight gain in about 50% of patients. (8) The choice of preventive treatment for migraine must be based on the balance between efficacy (compared to placebo) and adverse effects. In practice, the first choice drug is propranolol. (9) Because the frequency of migraines fluctuates over time, withdrawal of prophylaxis should be attempted on a regular basis, with the patient's consent.

Weight variations in the prophylactic therapy of primary headaches: 6-month follow-up.

We conducted a study on 367 patients (86% female, 14% male; mean age 37+/-15 years) suffering from migraine with and without aura and chronic tension-type headache to evaluate the incidence of weight gain, an undesirable side effect observed during prophylactic therapy in primary headaches. Patients treated with amitriptyline (20 and 40 mg), pizotifen (1 mg), propranolol (80-160 mg), atenolol (50-100 mg), verapamil (160-240 mg), valproate (600 mg) and gabapentin (900-1200 mg) were evaluated after a period of 3 and 6 months. In particular, 89 patients were assessed (78% female, 22% male) at 6 months, of whom 10 were in treatment with amitriptyline 20 mg, 19 with amitriptyline 40 mg, 7 with pizotifen (1 mg), 13 with propranolol (80-160 mg), 4 with verapamil (160 mg), 10 with valproate (600 mg), 15 with atenolol (50 mg) and 11 with gabapentin (900-1200 mg). The control group consisted of 97 patients with migraine (79% female, 21% male; mean age 35+/-16 years) without indication for prophylactic therapy. Weight variations >or=1 kg were considered. After 6 months of therapy, the percentage of patients with weight gain was 86% with pizotifen (6/7; mean weight increase 4.4+/-2.5 kg), 60% with amitriptyline 20 mg (6/10; 3.1+/-1.6), 47% with amitriptyline 40 mg (9/19; 5.4+/-2.7), 25% with valproate 600 mg (2/8, 3.0+/-2.8 kg), 25% with verapamil (1/4, 2.5 kg), 20% with atenolol (3/15, 1.7+/-0.6 kg), 9% with gabapentin (1/11, 1.5 kg) and 8% with propranolol (1/13; 6 kg). We conclude that propranolol, gabapentin, atenolol, verapamil and valproate affect body weight in a modest percentage of patients at 6 months. A greater mean weight gain at 6 months was found in patients treated with pizotifen, amitriptyline, and, in one patient out of 13, with propranolol.

[Current views on migraine and anti-migraine preparations]. / Sovremennye predstavleniia o migreni i mekhanizmakh deistviia sredstv dlia ee lecheniia i profilaktiki.

On the basis of comprehensive experimental and clinical research the authors defined a variety of migraine-related mechanisms and schemes of migraine-correction by drugs, which should be both of the vascular- and general-actions to ensure an effective medication.

[Effectiveness of tolfenamic acid in the prevention of migraine]. / Tolfenamines rugsties veiksmingumas migrenos profilaktikai.

The migraine prophylactic effect of tolfenamic acid 300 mg versus pizotifen 1.5 was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. 192 patients were included with a frequency of 4-8 moderate to severe migraine attacks monthly, with or without aura, fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for migraine as defined by the International Headache Society. A four-week baseline period without medication was followed by 12 weeks of treatment with tolfenamic acid 300 mg or pizotifen 1.5 mg. In both periods patients were allowed to take escape medication (paracetamol and codeine) if the treatment was inefficient. All the patients had a headache diary before and during treatment. The primary criterion of efficacy was reduction in attack frequency per 4 weeks. Also reduction in intensity or duration of migraine attacks in hours at the end of 12 weeks treatment compared to the baseline period was measured. Both groups exhibited significant reduction in attack frequency (p < 0.001). Tolfenamic acid significantly reduced severity compared to the run-in period (p = 0.009). Patients treated with pizotifen needed more escape medication when compared to the run-in period (p < 0.01). Tolerance, especially weight gain, was a major drawback with pizotifen. Because of its high efficacy, excellent tolerability and low cost, tolfenamic acid is an interesting option for migraine prophylaxis.

A comparative study of naproxen sodium, pizotyline and placebo in migraine prophylaxis.

318 patients satisfying the Ad Hoc Committee's criteria for common or classical migraine were entered into an 8 week single-blind placebo recording phase to establish, by diary cards, the frequency and severity of their attacks. 176 patients completed this and had records indicating 4-8 episodes in the 8 week period, with sufficient severity to reduce activity and/or work; these patients were randomized by a predetermined code, into three double-blinded groups: naproxen sodium 550 mg bid (60 patients), pizotyline 0.5 mg tid (59 patients), or placebo (57 patients). The patients were followed at monthly intervals for 12 weeks, with 25 dropping out (3 on naproxen sodium, and 2 each on pizotyline and placebo because of "side effects;" the remaining 18 because of noncompliance or reasons unrelated to therapy). Approximately 25% of patients in each of the 3 groups complained of side effects. Statistical analysis showed that both naproxen sodium and pizotyline were better than placebo, and of overall equivalent (i.e. equal) efficacy in the prophylaxis of migraine. In some respects, naproxen sodium was slightly more effective than pizotyline in the first month of treatment.

Estudo clínico com pizotifeno na prevençäo da enxaqueca / Clinical trial with pizotifen in migraine prophylaxis

Os autores avaliaram a eficácia e a tolerabilidade do pizotifeno no tratamento profilático da enxaqueca. Foi administrado 0,5 mg desta substancia, duas vezes ao dia, durante três meses ininterruptos, por via oral. Ao final da observaçäo, 80% dos pacientes tratados com pizotifeno tiveram significativa melhora ou tornaram-se assintomáticos. 18% apresentaram crises ou convulsöes e 2% abandonaram o tratamento. Os efeitos colaterais advindos do uso da droga foram leve sonolência e discreta sensaçäo de perda de equilíbrio. Nos casos sintomáticos, a näo regressäo dos sintomas deveu-se a fatores diversos como sejam síndrome de Horton, eclâmpsia e antecedente familiar, sendo estes refratários ao uso do medicamento. De um modo geral, o pizotifeno mostrou-se eficaz e bem tolerado pela maioria dos pacientes analisados em tratamento de curta e media duraçäo

Metoprolol and pizotifen in the prophylactic treatment of classical and common migraine. A double-blind investigation.

The prophylactic anti-migraine effect of the serotonin antagonist pizotifen and the beta 1-selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist metoprolol was compared in a double-blind cross-over study. The dosage of pizotifen was 0.5 mg t.i.d. and that of metoprolol 50 mg b.i.d. Thirty-five patients with classical or common migraine were included in the investigation. Five patients withdrew during the course of the study; four because of side effects (three on pizotifen, one on metoprolol) and one because of unassociated illness. The results show that there was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between metoprolol and pizotifen. The tolerance, especially regarding weight gain, was the major drawback with pizotifen, while metoprolol was generally well tolerated.

[Double-blind clinical study: flunarizine versus pizotifen in a single nightly dose in hemicrania patients]. / Studio clinico in doppio cieco: flunarizina contro pizotifene in un'unica somministrazione serale in pazienti emicranici.

In this double-blind clinical trial we compared the prophylactic efficacy of the calcium-entry blocker flunarizine (15 mg nocte) with that of pizotifen (1,5 mg nocte). In 30 patients affected by classical and common migraine. During a two months treatment both drugs showed a good efficacy. Flunarizine tended to more markedly suppress severity of pain and duration of attacks than pizotifen. Daytime drowsiness and weight gain occurred with both drugs; the first side effect was more evident in the group treated with flunarizine, the second one in the group treated with pizotifen.

Serotonin antagonists.

The realisation that serotonin plays a role not only in the carcinoid syndrome but also in migraine, nociception, dumping syndrome, vascular disease and hypertension, has led to an enormous amount of activity in search of serotonin antagonists. Numerous such pharmacological agents have been identified but only few have found their way into clinical use. All of them are competitive serotonin inhibitors, in that they vie for the same receptor as the amine itself and are thus able to block its action as well as imitate its effects. By far the widest use of such inhibitors is in the prevention of migraine, where they have effectively eliminated the dread of an attack from the life of the majority of patients. Whilst useful in the control of diarrhea in patients with carcinoid and dumping syndromes, their role in these diseases is limited. However, the possible role of serotonin in hypertension and nociception opens new avenues in the use of existing serotonin antagonists and calls for the discovery of a new generation of such pharmacological agents for the control of these conditions.

Pizotyline-induced cholestatic jaundice.

We treated a case of drug-induced cholestatic jaundice in which the causative agent was pizotyline (Pizotifen), a phenothiazine-related drug. The patient's symptoms were compatible with either hepatitis or biliary obstruction. Diagnostic laboratory studies were performed to exclude both of these entities. The history of drug ingestion plus the clinical and histologic features established pizotyline as the causative agent.

Pizotifen once daily in the prophylaxis of migraine: results of a multi-centre general practice study.

In an open, multi-centre, general practice study, 834 patients were entered to determine the efficacy and tolerance of pizotifen in a dose of 1.5 mg at night in the prophylaxis of migraine. Patients took pizotifen for 2 months after a run-in period of 1 month on previous prophylactic therapy. The results from the 307 patients who fully completed daily diary cards showed that pizotifen significantly reduced the mean number of migraine attacks per month and, on general questioning, the majority of patients said that they found pizotifen beneficial. The most frequent side-effects reported were drowsiness, although in one-third of affected patients this was transient, and weight gain, where the average increase was 0.7 kg (1.5 lb) over 2 months.