Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 19(2): 289-295, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31840388

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Laser and energy-based devices may be used for many cutaneous indications, including facial resurfacing, improving skin conditions, and reducing signs of photoaging. Currently, no consensus papers or guidelines exist concerning peri-operative agents and specifically their use for laser skin resurfacing and their potential/possible role in prevention or treatment of side effects. AIM: To explore current practice using laser and energy devices, a survey was developed to identify the trends in pre- and postprocedural treatment measures. METHODS: The survey was sent out digitally to 300 randomly selected US dermatologist and plastic surgeon physicians practicing medical esthetics using laser and other energy devices treatment for facial rejuvenation. The survey gathered information on demographics, types of devices used in the clinic and pre-/postprocedural measures for facial laser, and other energy-based devices treatment. RESULTS: The survey was active from June 15, to July 15, 2018, and fifty-eight dermatologists and plastic surgeons completed the survey (19.3% response rate, 58/300). The results showed inconsistency in skin preparation strategies and postprocedure wound care. The majority of survey participants (55/58 [96%]) reported prophylactic oral antiviral use pre- and post-treatment; however, there was inconsistency about when to start and when to stop the use. A similar inconsistency existed in the recommended period of post-treatment sun protection before and after treatment. CONCLUSION: The results of the survey confirmed the lack of consistency in the types and duration of pre- and postprocedural measures-emphasizing the need for evidence-based recommendations to optimize outcomes, prevent infection, enhance comfort, and reduce downtime.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Plasma Skin Regeneration/adverse effects , Postoperative Care/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Preoperative Care/statistics & numerical data , Radiofrequency Therapy/adverse effects , Consensus , Dermatologists/statistics & numerical data , Face , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/standards , Low-Level Light Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Plasma Skin Regeneration/standards , Plasma Skin Regeneration/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Care/standards , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/standards , Radiofrequency Therapy/standards , Radiofrequency Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Rejuvenation , Skin/immunology , Skin/radiation effects , Skin Aging/physiology , Skin Aging/radiation effects , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...